#psychologicalassessment — Public Fediverse posts

Great article reviewing and testing the accuracy of a range of direct measures (i.e., bogus items, requiring the respondent to choose a specific answer) and indirect measures (i.e., unobtrusive post hoc indices) for detecting careless responses in online surveys.

Excellent overview tables and very practical conclusions!

Open Access: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02484-3

#psychologicalassessment #psychometrics #researchmethods #psychology #quantitativepsychology

Great article reviewing and testing the accuracy of a range of direct measures (i.e., bogus items, requiring the respondent to choose a specific answer) and indirect measures (i.e., unobtrusive post hoc indices) for detecting careless responses in online surveys.

Excellent overview tables and very practical conclusions!

Open Access: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02484-3

#psychologicalassessment #psychometrics #researchmethods #psychology #quantitativepsychology

Great article reviewing and testing the accuracy of a range of direct measures (i.e., bogus items, requiring the respondent to choose a specific answer) and indirect measures (i.e., unobtrusive post hoc indices) for detecting careless responses in online surveys.

Excellent overview tables and very practical conclusions!

Open Access: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02484-3

#psychologicalassessment #psychometrics #researchmethods #psychology #quantitativepsychology

Great article reviewing and testing the accuracy of a range of direct measures (i.e., bogus items, requiring the respondent to choose a specific answer) and indirect measures (i.e., unobtrusive post hoc indices) for detecting careless responses in online surveys.

Excellent overview tables and very practical conclusions!

Open Access: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02484-3

#psychologicalassessment #psychometrics #researchmethods #psychology #quantitativepsychology

Great article reviewing and testing the accuracy of a range of direct measures (i.e., bogus items, requiring the respondent to choose a specific answer) and indirect measures (i.e., unobtrusive post hoc indices) for detecting careless responses in online surveys.

Excellent overview tables and very practical conclusions!

Open Access: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02484-3

#psychologicalassessment #psychometrics #researchmethods #psychology #quantitativepsychology

European Journal of #PsychologicalAssessment publishes TOP updates to 'materials, data, code publicly available'

and updated word limits, "the extended word count should primarily go towards the Methods and Results section" 👏

https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/full/10.1027/1015-5759/a000926

#Psychometrics #OpenScience

Our guideline on how to report assessments where experts review several sources of (longitudinal) information for a more accurate result has been available as a #PrePrint for a while and is now available at a journal:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X25000318

Led by @oscarkjell and team, the guideline aims to support researchers in planning, reporting, and evaluating research that aims to achieve best-estimate assessments.

#PsychologicalAssessment #Diagnosis #Psychometrics #ClinicalPsychology #Psychiatry

Individualizing personality assessments through humanistic trait-based interventions https://www.psypost.org/individualizing-personality-assessments-through-humanistic-trait-based-interventions/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #personalityassessment #humanisticpsychologist #psychologicalassessment #FFPAS #individualization

Led by @oscarkjell's team, together with @admin and loads of Not-on-Mastodon people we just published a #PrePrint
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.19.24304526v1

We propose reporting standards for "best-estimate assessments", i.e. where results from multiple experts and multiple sources of (longitudinal) information are integrated (e.g., a diagnosis).

#PsychologicalAssessment
@psychology

While I'm happy to have a new paper in #PsychologicalAssessment with my wonderful colleagues 🥳 , I'm done with #APA journals. No more!
We have reached a new low of #paywalls: #APA doesn't even provide authors with an authors' copy anymore. #ThankYouForNothing ...not even my own paper... 😔

https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0001295

#OpenScience vs #noaccess

Provisional principles for fostering cultural responsiveness in assessment:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ets2.12374
#ETSReport

It remains to be seen whether it is time to join the authors' enthusiasm who believe that
"...the application of these principles can address the criticisms of current assessments."

But some of the questions should be asked in any #HEI setting using assessments, e.g.,
"Why is this test needed?" 😉
"How will the test provide opportunity?"

#PsychologicalAssessment #Psychometrics

Did you know that the #AERA, #APA, #NCME Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing were available #OpenAccess in English and Spanish? https://www.testingstandards.net/open-access-files.html

#Psychometrics #PsychologicalTesting #PsychologicalAssessment #ValidityTheory ICYMI @TomJewell

Does anyone know whether there will be a new edition of the AERA APA NCME "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standards_for_Educational_and_Psychological_Testing

#Psychometrics #PsychologicalAssessment