#protocolsubstrate — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #protocolsubstrate, aggregated by home.social.
-
"The deeper move is to refuse the property right at the root. The #socialgraph was never LinkedIn’s to own. #Identity was never Google’s to issue. These are not facts that belong to vendors. They are facts that belong to the people, the relationships, and the #groups they describe.
The architectural form of that refusal is a #protocolsubstrate. Hold the commons as commons, in #openprotocols, so the enclosure is impossible in the first place. Build the substrate so the fence cannot be built." -
"The deeper move is to refuse the property right at the root. The #socialgraph was never LinkedIn’s to own. #Identity was never Google’s to issue. These are not facts that belong to vendors. They are facts that belong to the people, the relationships, and the #groups they describe.
The architectural form of that refusal is a #protocolsubstrate. Hold the commons as commons, in #openprotocols, so the enclosure is impossible in the first place. Build the substrate so the fence cannot be built." -
"The deeper move is to refuse the property right at the root. The #socialgraph was never LinkedIn’s to own. #Identity was never Google’s to issue. These are not facts that belong to vendors. They are facts that belong to the people, the relationships, and the #groups they describe.
The architectural form of that refusal is a #protocolsubstrate. Hold the commons as commons, in #openprotocols, so the enclosure is impossible in the first place. Build the substrate so the fence cannot be built." -
"The deeper move is to refuse the property right at the root. The #socialgraph was never LinkedIn’s to own. #Identity was never Google’s to issue. These are not facts that belong to vendors. They are facts that belong to the people, the relationships, and the #groups they describe.
The architectural form of that refusal is a #protocolsubstrate. Hold the commons as commons, in #openprotocols, so the enclosure is impossible in the first place. Build the substrate so the fence cannot be built." -
"The deeper move is to refuse the property right at the root. The #socialgraph was never LinkedIn’s to own. #Identity was never Google’s to issue. These are not facts that belong to vendors. They are facts that belong to the people, the relationships, and the #groups they describe.
The architectural form of that refusal is a #protocolsubstrate. Hold the commons as commons, in #openprotocols, so the enclosure is impossible in the first place. Build the substrate so the fence cannot be built."