#proportionalrepresentation — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #proportionalrepresentation, aggregated by home.social.
-
First-Past-The-Post Fail League❗️
UK Edition 🇬🇧🗳️!Today’s champion:
Kemi Badenoch
MP for North West EssexWon with only 35.6% of total voter ballots cast
Multi-Member #ProportionalRepresentation please! Like and share if you agree!
#UKPolitics @electoralreform @MakeVotesMatter
-
First-Past-The-Post Fail League❗️
UK Edition 🇬🇧🗳️!Today’s champion:
Sadik Al-Hassan
MP for North SomersetWon with only 35.6% of total voter ballots cast
Multi-Member #ProportionalRepresentation please! Like and share if you agree!
#UKPolitics @electoralreform @MakeVotesMatter
-
First-Past-The-Post Fail League❗️
UK Edition 🇬🇧🗳️!Today’s champion:
Sadik Al-Hassan
MP for North SomersetWon with only 35.6% of total voter ballots cast
Multi-Member #ProportionalRepresentation please! Like and share if you agree!
#UKPolitics @electoralreform @MakeVotesMatter
-
First-Past-The-Post Fail League❗️
UK Edition 🇬🇧🗳️!Today’s champion:
Sadik Al-Hassan
MP for North SomersetWon with only 35.6% of total voter ballots cast
Multi-Member #ProportionalRepresentation please! Like and share if you agree!
#UKPolitics @electoralreform @MakeVotesMatter
-
First-Past-The-Post Fail League❗️
UK Edition 🇬🇧🗳️!Today’s champion:
Sadik Al-Hassan
MP for North SomersetWon with only 35.6% of total voter ballots cast
Multi-Member #ProportionalRepresentation please! Like and share if you agree!
#UKPolitics @electoralreform @MakeVotesMatter
-
The majority of experts who testified at the ERRE committee gave evidence that proportional representation was the best option for meeting the committee's goals. No one disputed this. That was the consensus. Further, prior to the committee meetings, the members had meetings with Canadians across the country. Most Canadians that the committee members met with cited PR as their preference for electoral reform.
The Liberal members of the committee, however, ignored the evidence and, in the end, chose to inexplicably advocate for Alternative Vote (which, besides a different ballot, is basically the same as FPTP, in that it is a single member riding winner-take-all system --> winner take all is the problem). This led to Maryam Monsef's idiotic ridicule of the Gallagher Index. Ignoring evidence and ridiculing science is often seen with right wing parties. Under no circumstances should either the GPC or the NDP partake in such nonsense.
-
The majority of experts who testified at the ERRE committee gave evidence that proportional representation was the best option for meeting the committee's goals. No one disputed this. That was the consensus. Further, prior to the committee meetings, the members had meetings with Canadians across the country. Most Canadians that the committee members met with cited PR as their preference for electoral reform.
The Liberal members of the committee, however, ignored the evidence and, in the end, chose to inexplicably advocate for Alternative Vote (which, besides a different ballot, is basically the same as FPTP, in that it is a single member riding winner-take-all system --> winner take all is the problem). This led to Maryam Monsef's idiotic ridicule of the Gallagher Index. Ignoring evidence and ridiculing science is often seen with right wing parties. Under no circumstances should either the GPC or the NDP partake in such nonsense.
-
The majority of experts who testified at the ERRE committee gave evidence that proportional representation was the best option for meeting the committee's goals. No one disputed this. That was the consensus. Further, prior to the committee meetings, the members had meetings with Canadians across the country. Most Canadians that the committee members met with cited PR as their preference for electoral reform.
The Liberal members of the committee, however, ignored the evidence and, in the end, chose to inexplicably advocate for Alternative Vote (which, besides a different ballot, is basically the same as FPTP, in that it is a single member riding winner-take-all system --> winner take all is the problem). This led to Maryam Monsef's idiotic ridicule of the Gallagher Index. Ignoring evidence and ridiculing science is often seen with right wing parties. Under no circumstances should either the GPC or the NDP partake in such nonsense.
-
The majority of experts who testified at the ERRE committee gave evidence that proportional representation was the best option for meeting the committee's goals. No one disputed this. That was the consensus. Further, prior to the committee meetings, the members had meetings with Canadians across the country. Most Canadians that the committee members met with cited PR as their preference for electoral reform.
The Liberal members of the committee, however, ignored the evidence and, in the end, chose to inexplicably advocate for Alternative Vote (which, besides a different ballot, is basically the same as FPTP, in that it is a single member riding winner-take-all system --> winner take all is the problem). This led to Maryam Monsef's idiotic ridicule of the Gallagher Index. Ignoring evidence and ridiculing science is often seen with right wing parties. Under no circumstances should either the GPC or the NDP partake in such nonsense.
-
The majority of experts who testified at the ERRE committee gave evidence that proportional representation was the best option for meeting the committee's goals. No one disputed this. That was the consensus. Further, prior to the committee meetings, the members had meetings with Canadians across the country. Most Canadians that the committee members met with cited PR as their preference for electoral reform.
The Liberal members of the committee, however, ignored the evidence and, in the end, chose to inexplicably advocate for Alternative Vote (which, besides a different ballot, is basically the same as FPTP, in that it is a single member riding winner-take-all system --> winner take all is the problem). This led to Maryam Monsef's idiotic ridicule of the Gallagher Index. Ignoring evidence and ridiculing science is often seen with right wing parties. Under no circumstances should either the GPC or the NDP partake in such nonsense.
-
trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/10/voti... LP-165 VOTING SYSTEM FAIRNESS GLOBALLY: Climate Justice, Indigenous Rights and Ending Fossil Fuels in an Age of Political Corruption; RECOMMENDED: Proportional Representation (PR) #GlobalVoting #PRsystems #ProportionalRepresentation
LP-165 VOTING SYSTEM FAIRNESS ...