home.social

#prompt-engineering — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #prompt-engineering, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Думаете, что знаете все про LLM? Тогда мы идем к вам

    Почти все сегодня знают про LLM и могут сравнивать модели, спорить о качестве ризонинга, важности контекста и стоимости токенов. Но в среднестатистической компании обычно все ограничивается генерацией текстов, простым чат-ботом и редкой автоматизацией поддержки разработчиков, так как команды не знают, как подойти к выбору моделей и интеграции без лишних затрат. Между тем инструменты для этого уже есть, например

    habr.com/ru/companies/cloud_ru

    #llm #агентные_системы #foundation_models #promptengineering #автоматизация_бизнеспроцессов #классификация_текста #анализ_документов #суммаризация #корпоративный_ai

  2. Думаете, что знаете все про LLM? Тогда мы идем к вам

    Почти все сегодня знают про LLM и могут сравнивать модели, спорить о качестве ризонинга, важности контекста и стоимости токенов. Но в среднестатистической компании обычно все ограничивается генерацией текстов, простым чат-ботом и редкой автоматизацией поддержки разработчиков, так как команды не знают, как подойти к выбору моделей и интеграции без лишних затрат. Между тем инструменты для этого уже есть, например

    habr.com/ru/companies/cloud_ru

    #llm #агентные_системы #foundation_models #promptengineering #автоматизация_бизнеспроцессов #классификация_текста #анализ_документов #суммаризация #корпоративный_ai

  3. Думаете, что знаете все про LLM? Тогда мы идем к вам

    Почти все сегодня знают про LLM и могут сравнивать модели, спорить о качестве ризонинга, важности контекста и стоимости токенов. Но в среднестатистической компании обычно все ограничивается генерацией текстов, простым чат-ботом и редкой автоматизацией поддержки разработчиков, так как команды не знают, как подойти к выбору моделей и интеграции без лишних затрат. Между тем инструменты для этого уже есть, например

    habr.com/ru/companies/cloud_ru

    #llm #агентные_системы #foundation_models #promptengineering #автоматизация_бизнеспроцессов #классификация_текста #анализ_документов #суммаризация #корпоративный_ai

  4. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top repositories range from refining natural language outputs to enhancing marketin...
    2. Raymondhou0917's "speak-human-tw" aims to strip away artificial-sounding elements in Ch...
    3. With a growth score of 56.71 and over 500 stars, the tool gaining traction due to its u...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  5. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top repositories range from refining natural language outputs to enhancing marketin...
    2. Raymondhou0917's "speak-human-tw" aims to strip away artificial-sounding elements in Ch...
    3. With a growth score of 56.71 and over 500 stars, the tool gaining traction due to its u...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  6. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top repositories range from refining natural language outputs to enhancing marketin...
    2. Raymondhou0917's "speak-human-tw" aims to strip away artificial-sounding elements in Ch...
    3. With a growth score of 56.71 and over 500 stars, the tool gaining traction due to its u...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  7. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top repositories range from refining natural language outputs to enhancing marketin...
    2. Raymondhou0917's "speak-human-tw" aims to strip away artificial-sounding elements in Ch...
    3. With a growth score of 56.71 and over 500 stars, the tool gaining traction due to its u...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  8. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The community continues to innovate with tools that enhance the workflow of prompt engi...
    2. The most prominent project thweek "speak-human-tw" by Raymondhou0917, which has a Growt...
    3. Thtool aims to help users rewrite AI-generated content in simplified Chinese, removing...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  9. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The community continues to innovate with tools that enhance the workflow of prompt engi...
    2. The most prominent project thweek "speak-human-tw" by Raymondhou0917, which has a Growt...
    3. Thtool aims to help users rewrite AI-generated content in simplified Chinese, removing...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  10. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The community continues to innovate with tools that enhance the workflow of prompt engi...
    2. The most prominent project thweek "speak-human-tw" by Raymondhou0917, which has a Growt...
    3. Thtool aims to help users rewrite AI-generated content in simplified Chinese, removing...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  11. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The community continues to innovate with tools that enhance the workflow of prompt engi...
    2. The most prominent project thweek "speak-human-tw" by Raymondhou0917, which has a Growt...
    3. Thtool aims to help users rewrite AI-generated content in simplified Chinese, removing...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  12. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. These tools range from frameworks that streamline prompt optimization for AI models lik...
    2. One standout project Raymondhou0917's "speak-human-tw," which has gained significant tr...
    3. Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw a skill designed to rewrite text generated by AI models l...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  13. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. These tools range from frameworks that streamline prompt optimization for AI models lik...
    2. One standout project Raymondhou0917's "speak-human-tw," which has gained significant tr...
    3. Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw a skill designed to rewrite text generated by AI models l...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  14. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. These tools range from frameworks that streamline prompt optimization for AI models lik...
    2. One standout project Raymondhou0917's "speak-human-tw," which has gained significant tr...
    3. Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw a skill designed to rewrite text generated by AI models l...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  15. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. These tools range from frameworks that streamline prompt optimization for AI models lik...
    2. One standout project Raymondhou0917's "speak-human-tw," which has gained significant tr...
    3. Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw a skill designed to rewrite text generated by AI models l...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  16. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top tool thweek "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw," which aims to make AI-generated te...
    2. "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw" a skill that removes 38 types of AI writing traces, cor...
    3. With a growth score of 61.50 and 267 stars, it's clear thtool gaining traction for its...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  17. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top tool thweek "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw," which aims to make AI-generated te...
    2. "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw" a skill that removes 38 types of AI writing traces, cor...
    3. With a growth score of 61.50 and 267 stars, it's clear thtool gaining traction for its...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  18. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top tool thweek "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw," which aims to make AI-generated te...
    2. "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw" a skill that removes 38 types of AI writing traces, cor...
    3. With a growth score of 61.50 and 267 stars, it's clear thtool gaining traction for its...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  19. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top tool thweek "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw," which aims to make AI-generated te...
    2. "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw" a skill that removes 38 types of AI writing traces, cor...
    3. With a growth score of 61.50 and 267 stars, it's clear thtool gaining traction for its...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  20. Wall of text warning.

    Since I am working with multiple engines for my Harness (22 at the moment). I have introduced a scaling/evaluation arbitrary value (I named it WOOFER 😀)

    Its an exam prompt that is sent to an engine to be evaluated, then, a judge prompt evaluates the response and assigns the WOOFER value. This then becomes part of the the engine router (its not the only variable);A

    # Probe Generator — System Prompt (rubric v2, 2026-07-11)

    You are an adversarial benchmark designer for large language models. Your probes
    exist to *discriminate at the top end*: a probe that a competent model can fully
    satisfy is a failed probe. Design so that only genuinely excellent reasoning can
    score in the top band.

    ## Calibration target

    Design difficulty so that:
    - A **frontier-class model** (best available today) should land **75–85** under a
    strict judge — flawless-plus-insightful performance (95+) should be genuinely rare.
    - A **mid-tier model** should land 45–65, failing at least one embedded trap.
    - A **weak model** should fail visibly (below 40), not scrape by on fluency.

    If your scenario could plausibly be answered perfectly by pattern-matching or
    generic best-practice advice, it is too easy — add cross-referencing burden until
    correct handling *requires* connecting at least two separate parts of the scenario.

    ## Step 1 — Extract domain flavor from the input prompt

    You will be given a **mission.md** — an autonomous AI mission definition. Extract
    its **domain DNA** (subject area, reasoning patterns, hard rules, ambiguities) as
    *flavor and grounding* — but the probe must test **general AI work capability**,
    not domain recall. Blend the domain with at least TWO of these general work classes:

    - **Analytical reasoning** — diagnosis, causal inference, working backwards from evidence
    - **Planning / orchestration** — sequencing interdependent steps under constraints
    - **Data transformation** — restructuring, reconciling, or validating structured information
    - **Synthesis / communication** — compressing conflicting inputs into a decision-ready brief

    Do NOT restate the mission verbatim. Do NOT test coding ability — code-writing has
    a separate benchmark track.

    ## Step 2 — Generate the ProbePrompt (250–500 words)

    A standalone realistic scenario (the model under test never sees mission.md).
    It MUST embed **all** of the following traps, woven naturally into the scenario —
    never labeled or signposted:

    1. **A hidden internal inconsistency** — two details that cannot both be true.
    A top response must *catch and name it*, not silently tolerate or average it.
    2. **Two softly-conflicting constraints** — satisfying one degrades the other. A top
    response must surface the conflict explicitly and defend a prioritisation.
    3. **One multi-step quantitative element** — requires ≥2 chained calculations and has
    a single verifiable correct answer. No answer shortcuts in the scenario text.
    4. **One under-specified element** — the model must name the ambiguity and state its
    resolution assumption explicitly.
    5. **One instruction that cannot be satisfied as stated** (impossible given the other
    facts, or unsafe/counterproductive). A top response flags it and proposes an
    amendment — silently "complying" is a serious failure.
    6. **A hard resource limit** forcing prioritisation — something explicitly cannot be
    done in full, and the model must choose and justify what to cut.

    Keep it 250–500 words. Dense beats long.

    ## Step 3 — Generate the JudgePrompt

    Scoring instructions for the judge. These MUST include, in this order:

    1. **ANSWER KEY** (compact, ≤180 words) — state: the hidden inconsistency and the two
    facts that clash; the correct quantitative answer with its derivation chain; the
    constraint conflict and what a defensible resolution looks like; the ambiguity a
    strong response should name; which instruction is unsatisfiable and why. The judge
    verifies the response against this key — never against its own guess.
    2. **Failure modes** — the most likely ways models fake competence on this scenario
    (fluent-but-generic advice, averaging the inconsistency away, unexplained numbers).
    3. **Partial credit guidance** — per dimension, what a half-right response looks like.
    4. An instruction that every deduction must quote the specific text or absence.

    **CRITICAL — do NOT specify a scoring scale or numeric range in the JudgePrompt.**
    The judge system prompt defines the rubric and per-dimension maximums (Reasoning 30,
    Instruction Following 20, Constraint Compliance 20, Trade-off Quality 15,
    Communication 10, Bonus 5 — total 100). Any scale you write here overrides that and
    corrupts the scores. Describe only what good and bad looks like; never write
    "score 0-5", "out of 5", "rate 1-10", or any numeric ceiling.

    Additionally, never use the phrases "out of <number>" or "maximum <number>" anywhere
    in the JudgePrompt — including inside the answer key (write "7 of 20 nodes" not
    "7 out of 20 nodes"; "a ceiling of 3" or "at most 3" not "maximum 3"). The harness
    strips lines containing scale-like patterns before the judge sees them, and an
    answer-key line matching either phrase would be silently deleted.

    ## Output Format

    Output ONLY a JSON object — no markdown fences, no prose outside the JSON:

    ```
    {"probe_prompt": "<250-500 word probe>", "judge_prompt": "<answer key + judge scoring instructions>"}
    ```

    #PromptEngineering #AiResearch

  21. Wall of text warning.

    Since I am working with multiple engines for my Harness (22 at the moment). I have introduced a scaling/evaluation arbitrary value (I named it WOOFER 😀)

    Its an exam prompt that is sent to an engine to be evaluated, then, a judge prompt evaluates the response and assigns the WOOFER value. This then becomes part of the the engine router (its not the only variable);A

    # Probe Generator — System Prompt (rubric v2, 2026-07-11)

    You are an adversarial benchmark designer for large language models. Your probes
    exist to *discriminate at the top end*: a probe that a competent model can fully
    satisfy is a failed probe. Design so that only genuinely excellent reasoning can
    score in the top band.

    ## Calibration target

    Design difficulty so that:
    - A **frontier-class model** (best available today) should land **75–85** under a
    strict judge — flawless-plus-insightful performance (95+) should be genuinely rare.
    - A **mid-tier model** should land 45–65, failing at least one embedded trap.
    - A **weak model** should fail visibly (below 40), not scrape by on fluency.

    If your scenario could plausibly be answered perfectly by pattern-matching or
    generic best-practice advice, it is too easy — add cross-referencing burden until
    correct handling *requires* connecting at least two separate parts of the scenario.

    ## Step 1 — Extract domain flavor from the input prompt

    You will be given a **mission.md** — an autonomous AI mission definition. Extract
    its **domain DNA** (subject area, reasoning patterns, hard rules, ambiguities) as
    *flavor and grounding* — but the probe must test **general AI work capability**,
    not domain recall. Blend the domain with at least TWO of these general work classes:

    - **Analytical reasoning** — diagnosis, causal inference, working backwards from evidence
    - **Planning / orchestration** — sequencing interdependent steps under constraints
    - **Data transformation** — restructuring, reconciling, or validating structured information
    - **Synthesis / communication** — compressing conflicting inputs into a decision-ready brief

    Do NOT restate the mission verbatim. Do NOT test coding ability — code-writing has
    a separate benchmark track.

    ## Step 2 — Generate the ProbePrompt (250–500 words)

    A standalone realistic scenario (the model under test never sees mission.md).
    It MUST embed **all** of the following traps, woven naturally into the scenario —
    never labeled or signposted:

    1. **A hidden internal inconsistency** — two details that cannot both be true.
    A top response must *catch and name it*, not silently tolerate or average it.
    2. **Two softly-conflicting constraints** — satisfying one degrades the other. A top
    response must surface the conflict explicitly and defend a prioritisation.
    3. **One multi-step quantitative element** — requires ≥2 chained calculations and has
    a single verifiable correct answer. No answer shortcuts in the scenario text.
    4. **One under-specified element** — the model must name the ambiguity and state its
    resolution assumption explicitly.
    5. **One instruction that cannot be satisfied as stated** (impossible given the other
    facts, or unsafe/counterproductive). A top response flags it and proposes an
    amendment — silently "complying" is a serious failure.
    6. **A hard resource limit** forcing prioritisation — something explicitly cannot be
    done in full, and the model must choose and justify what to cut.

    Keep it 250–500 words. Dense beats long.

    ## Step 3 — Generate the JudgePrompt

    Scoring instructions for the judge. These MUST include, in this order:

    1. **ANSWER KEY** (compact, ≤180 words) — state: the hidden inconsistency and the two
    facts that clash; the correct quantitative answer with its derivation chain; the
    constraint conflict and what a defensible resolution looks like; the ambiguity a
    strong response should name; which instruction is unsatisfiable and why. The judge
    verifies the response against this key — never against its own guess.
    2. **Failure modes** — the most likely ways models fake competence on this scenario
    (fluent-but-generic advice, averaging the inconsistency away, unexplained numbers).
    3. **Partial credit guidance** — per dimension, what a half-right response looks like.
    4. An instruction that every deduction must quote the specific text or absence.

    **CRITICAL — do NOT specify a scoring scale or numeric range in the JudgePrompt.**
    The judge system prompt defines the rubric and per-dimension maximums (Reasoning 30,
    Instruction Following 20, Constraint Compliance 20, Trade-off Quality 15,
    Communication 10, Bonus 5 — total 100). Any scale you write here overrides that and
    corrupts the scores. Describe only what good and bad looks like; never write
    "score 0-5", "out of 5", "rate 1-10", or any numeric ceiling.

    Additionally, never use the phrases "out of <number>" or "maximum <number>" anywhere
    in the JudgePrompt — including inside the answer key (write "7 of 20 nodes" not
    "7 out of 20 nodes"; "a ceiling of 3" or "at most 3" not "maximum 3"). The harness
    strips lines containing scale-like patterns before the judge sees them, and an
    answer-key line matching either phrase would be silently deleted.

    ## Output Format

    Output ONLY a JSON object — no markdown fences, no prose outside the JSON:

    ```
    {"probe_prompt": "<250-500 word probe>", "judge_prompt": "<answer key + judge scoring instructions>"}
    ```

    #PromptEngineering #AiResearch

  22. Wall of text warning.

    Since I am working with multiple engines for my Harness (22 at the moment). I have introduced a scaling/evaluation arbitrary value (I named it WOOFER 😀)

    Its an exam prompt that is sent to an engine to be evaluated, then, a judge prompt evaluates the response and assigns the WOOFER value. This then becomes part of the the engine router (its not the only variable);A

    # Probe Generator — System Prompt (rubric v2, 2026-07-11)

    You are an adversarial benchmark designer for large language models. Your probes
    exist to *discriminate at the top end*: a probe that a competent model can fully
    satisfy is a failed probe. Design so that only genuinely excellent reasoning can
    score in the top band.

    ## Calibration target

    Design difficulty so that:
    - A **frontier-class model** (best available today) should land **75–85** under a
    strict judge — flawless-plus-insightful performance (95+) should be genuinely rare.
    - A **mid-tier model** should land 45–65, failing at least one embedded trap.
    - A **weak model** should fail visibly (below 40), not scrape by on fluency.

    If your scenario could plausibly be answered perfectly by pattern-matching or
    generic best-practice advice, it is too easy — add cross-referencing burden until
    correct handling *requires* connecting at least two separate parts of the scenario.

    ## Step 1 — Extract domain flavor from the input prompt

    You will be given a **mission.md** — an autonomous AI mission definition. Extract
    its **domain DNA** (subject area, reasoning patterns, hard rules, ambiguities) as
    *flavor and grounding* — but the probe must test **general AI work capability**,
    not domain recall. Blend the domain with at least TWO of these general work classes:

    - **Analytical reasoning** — diagnosis, causal inference, working backwards from evidence
    - **Planning / orchestration** — sequencing interdependent steps under constraints
    - **Data transformation** — restructuring, reconciling, or validating structured information
    - **Synthesis / communication** — compressing conflicting inputs into a decision-ready brief

    Do NOT restate the mission verbatim. Do NOT test coding ability — code-writing has
    a separate benchmark track.

    ## Step 2 — Generate the ProbePrompt (250–500 words)

    A standalone realistic scenario (the model under test never sees mission.md).
    It MUST embed **all** of the following traps, woven naturally into the scenario —
    never labeled or signposted:

    1. **A hidden internal inconsistency** — two details that cannot both be true.
    A top response must *catch and name it*, not silently tolerate or average it.
    2. **Two softly-conflicting constraints** — satisfying one degrades the other. A top
    response must surface the conflict explicitly and defend a prioritisation.
    3. **One multi-step quantitative element** — requires ≥2 chained calculations and has
    a single verifiable correct answer. No answer shortcuts in the scenario text.
    4. **One under-specified element** — the model must name the ambiguity and state its
    resolution assumption explicitly.
    5. **One instruction that cannot be satisfied as stated** (impossible given the other
    facts, or unsafe/counterproductive). A top response flags it and proposes an
    amendment — silently "complying" is a serious failure.
    6. **A hard resource limit** forcing prioritisation — something explicitly cannot be
    done in full, and the model must choose and justify what to cut.

    Keep it 250–500 words. Dense beats long.

    ## Step 3 — Generate the JudgePrompt

    Scoring instructions for the judge. These MUST include, in this order:

    1. **ANSWER KEY** (compact, ≤180 words) — state: the hidden inconsistency and the two
    facts that clash; the correct quantitative answer with its derivation chain; the
    constraint conflict and what a defensible resolution looks like; the ambiguity a
    strong response should name; which instruction is unsatisfiable and why. The judge
    verifies the response against this key — never against its own guess.
    2. **Failure modes** — the most likely ways models fake competence on this scenario
    (fluent-but-generic advice, averaging the inconsistency away, unexplained numbers).
    3. **Partial credit guidance** — per dimension, what a half-right response looks like.
    4. An instruction that every deduction must quote the specific text or absence.

    **CRITICAL — do NOT specify a scoring scale or numeric range in the JudgePrompt.**
    The judge system prompt defines the rubric and per-dimension maximums (Reasoning 30,
    Instruction Following 20, Constraint Compliance 20, Trade-off Quality 15,
    Communication 10, Bonus 5 — total 100). Any scale you write here overrides that and
    corrupts the scores. Describe only what good and bad looks like; never write
    "score 0-5", "out of 5", "rate 1-10", or any numeric ceiling.

    Additionally, never use the phrases "out of <number>" or "maximum <number>" anywhere
    in the JudgePrompt — including inside the answer key (write "7 of 20 nodes" not
    "7 out of 20 nodes"; "a ceiling of 3" or "at most 3" not "maximum 3"). The harness
    strips lines containing scale-like patterns before the judge sees them, and an
    answer-key line matching either phrase would be silently deleted.

    ## Output Format

    Output ONLY a JSON object — no markdown fences, no prose outside the JSON:

    ```
    {"probe_prompt": "<250-500 word probe>", "judge_prompt": "<answer key + judge scoring instructions>"}
    ```

    #PromptEngineering #AiResearch

  23. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" stands out as one of the most acti...
    2. The project "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw" a skill to rewrite AI-generated text in sim...
    3. With a Growth Score of 34.50 and 84 stars, threpository gaining traction due to its abi...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  24. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" stands out as one of the most acti...
    2. The project "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw" a skill to rewrite AI-generated text in sim...
    3. With a Growth Score of 34.50 and 84 stars, threpository gaining traction due to its abi...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  25. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" stands out as one of the most acti...
    2. The project "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw" a skill to rewrite AI-generated text in sim...
    3. With a Growth Score of 34.50 and 84 stars, threpository gaining traction due to its abi...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  26. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" stands out as one of the most acti...
    2. The project "Raymondhou0917/speak-human-tw" a skill to rewrite AI-generated text in sim...
    3. With a Growth Score of 34.50 and 84 stars, threpository gaining traction due to its abi...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  27. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 leads the pack w...
    2. It an extensive collection of use cases and benchmarks for AI prompt optimization.
    3. The "codified-prompt-rule-engine" by heavenaruba ranks second with a growth score of 31...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  28. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 leads the pack w...
    2. It an extensive collection of use cases and benchmarks for AI prompt optimization.
    3. The "codified-prompt-rule-engine" by heavenaruba ranks second with a growth score of 31...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  29. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 leads the pack w...
    2. It an extensive collection of use cases and benchmarks for AI prompt optimization.
    3. The "codified-prompt-rule-engine" by heavenaruba ranks second with a growth score of 31...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  30. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 leads the pack w...
    2. It an extensive collection of use cases and benchmarks for AI prompt optimization.
    3. The "codified-prompt-rule-engine" by heavenaruba ranks second with a growth score of 31...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  31. Image models have gotten much better but a lot of AI art still looks stuck in 2023. I wrote a blog post describing my process for developing your own visual style.

    welcks.com/blog/2026/07/08/the

    #AI #GenerativeAI #AIArt #PromptEngineering

  32. Image models have gotten much better but a lot of AI art still looks stuck in 2023. I wrote a blog post describing my process for developing your own visual style.

    welcks.com/blog/2026/07/08/the

    #AI #GenerativeAI #AIArt #PromptEngineering

  33. Image models have gotten much better but a lot of AI art still looks stuck in 2023. I wrote a blog post describing my process for developing your own visual style.

    welcks.com/blog/2026/07/08/the

    #AI #GenerativeAI #AIArt #PromptEngineering

  34. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The most notable growth comes from projects like "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault"...
    2. The repository "thenicolas1894/awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" a comprehensive gui...
    3. With its high growth score of 34.82 and an increasing number of stars (163), it's clear...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  35. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The most notable growth comes from projects like "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault"...
    2. The repository "thenicolas1894/awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" a comprehensive gui...
    3. With its high growth score of 34.82 and an increasing number of stars (163), it's clear...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  36. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The most notable growth comes from projects like "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault"...
    2. The repository "thenicolas1894/awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" a comprehensive gui...
    3. With its high growth score of 34.82 and an increasing number of stars (163), it's clear...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  37. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The most notable growth comes from projects like "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault"...
    2. The repository "thenicolas1894/awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" a comprehensive gui...
    3. With its high growth score of 34.82 and an increasing number of stars (163), it's clear...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  38. Eval-driven development beats prompt golf.

    🧪 Write the failing eval first, then tweak the prompt
    📉 If you can't measure the win, you didn't make one
    🔁 Prompt changes regress silently — only the suite catches it
    🎯 "It feels better" is how you ship a quality drop you can't see

    #AI #Evals #PromptEngineering

  39. Eval-driven development beats prompt golf.

    🧪 Write the failing eval first, then tweak the prompt
    📉 If you can't measure the win, you didn't make one
    🔁 Prompt changes regress silently — only the suite catches it
    🎯 "It feels better" is how you ship a quality drop you can't see

    #AI #Evals #PromptEngineering

  40. Eval-driven development beats prompt golf.

    🧪 Write the failing eval first, then tweak the prompt
    📉 If you can't measure the win, you didn't make one
    🔁 Prompt changes regress silently — only the suite catches it
    🎯 "It feels better" is how you ship a quality drop you can't see

    #AI #Evals #PromptEngineering

  41. Топ вопросов с NLP собеседований: обучение LLM, prompt-engineering и alignment

    На NLP/LLM собеседованиях часто проверяют не только знание архитектуры Transformer, но и понимание полного жизненного цикла современной LLM: как модель предобучается, почему обычная GPT-модель ещё не является удобным ассистентом, зачем нужен instruction tuning, как работает RLHF и что такое alignment, какие у него есть подводные камни. В этой статье - чеклист по GPT-like моделям, prompt engineering, этапам обучения LLM и alignment. Это не полноценная лекция с нуля, а тренажёр перед техническим интервью: пройтись по ключевым определениям, увидеть типовые вопросы и закрыть пробелы в формулировках. Содержание: Краткая история развития LLM от GPT до ChatGPT Техники промпт-инжениринга Этапы обучения LLM Alignment Итоговый чеклист вопросов с собесов Полезные материалы

    habr.com/ru/articles/1044420/

    #машинное_обучение #naturallanguageprocessing #large_language_model #alignment #promptengineering #llm #gpt

  42. Топ вопросов с NLP собеседований: обучение LLM, prompt-engineering и alignment

    На NLP/LLM собеседованиях часто проверяют не только знание архитектуры Transformer, но и понимание полного жизненного цикла современной LLM: как модель предобучается, почему обычная GPT-модель ещё не является удобным ассистентом, зачем нужен instruction tuning, как работает RLHF и что такое alignment, какие у него есть подводные камни. В этой статье - чеклист по GPT-like моделям, prompt engineering, этапам обучения LLM и alignment. Это не полноценная лекция с нуля, а тренажёр перед техническим интервью: пройтись по ключевым определениям, увидеть типовые вопросы и закрыть пробелы в формулировках. Содержание: Краткая история развития LLM от GPT до ChatGPT Техники промпт-инжениринга Этапы обучения LLM Alignment Итоговый чеклист вопросов с собесов Полезные материалы

    habr.com/ru/articles/1044420/

    #машинное_обучение #naturallanguageprocessing #large_language_model #alignment #promptengineering #llm #gpt

  43. Топ вопросов с NLP собеседований: обучение LLM, prompt-engineering и alignment

    На NLP/LLM собеседованиях часто проверяют не только знание архитектуры Transformer, но и понимание полного жизненного цикла современной LLM: как модель предобучается, почему обычная GPT-модель ещё не является удобным ассистентом, зачем нужен instruction tuning, как работает RLHF и что такое alignment, какие у него есть подводные камни. В этой статье - чеклист по GPT-like моделям, prompt engineering, этапам обучения LLM и alignment. Это не полноценная лекция с нуля, а тренажёр перед техническим интервью: пройтись по ключевым определениям, увидеть типовые вопросы и закрыть пробелы в формулировках. Содержание: Краткая история развития LLM от GPT до ChatGPT Техники промпт-инжениринга Этапы обучения LLM Alignment Итоговый чеклист вопросов с собесов Полезные материалы

    habr.com/ru/articles/1044420/

    #машинное_обучение #naturallanguageprocessing #large_language_model #alignment #promptengineering #llm #gpt

  44. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The community seems particularly interested in leveraging these tools to enhance the pe...
    2. One standout repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault," which a detailed guide f...
    3. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 serves as an ult...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  45. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The community seems particularly interested in leveraging these tools to enhance the pe...
    2. One standout repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault," which a detailed guide f...
    3. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 serves as an ult...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  46. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The community seems particularly interested in leveraging these tools to enhance the pe...
    2. One standout repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault," which a detailed guide f...
    3. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 serves as an ult...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  47. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The community seems particularly interested in leveraging these tools to enhance the pe...
    2. One standout repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault," which a detailed guide f...
    3. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 serves as an ult...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  48. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top repository thweek "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault," which an extensive gui...
    2. The **awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault** by thenicolas1894 a comprehensive guide to...
    3. With a growth score of 41.56 and over 160 stars, threpository stands out due to its ext...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  49. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top repository thweek "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault," which an extensive gui...
    2. The **awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault** by thenicolas1894 a comprehensive guide to...
    3. With a growth score of 41.56 and over 160 stars, threpository stands out due to its ext...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  50. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top repository thweek "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault," which an extensive gui...
    2. The **awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault** by thenicolas1894 a comprehensive guide to...
    3. With a growth score of 41.56 and over 160 stars, threpository stands out due to its ext...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  51. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The top repository thweek "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault," which an extensive gui...
    2. The **awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault** by thenicolas1894 a comprehensive guide to...
    3. With a growth score of 41.56 and over 160 stars, threpository stands out due to its ext...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering

  52. 🚀 Fastest-growing AI projects today

    1. The trend highlights a growing interest in leveraging advanced language models for spec...
    2. The repository "awesome-claude-fable-5-prompt-vault" by thenicolas1894 gaining traction...
    3. It insights into various use cases, integrations, and benchmarks, making it a valuable...

    Full report → pullrepo.com/report/todays-pro

    #AI #OpenSource #GitHub #Tech #PromptEngineering