#postpublicationreview — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #postpublicationreview, aggregated by home.social.
-
This is very meta... essentially someone who is in the business of writing fake papers has written a fake paper criticizing Pubpeer and post publication peer review as being vulnerable to “misuse” and “hyper-skepticism.
#RetractionWatch #AcademicIntegrity #ResearchMisconduct #ScholarlyPublishing #PostPublicationReview #PubPeer #FakeScience #MetaScience #PeerReview #ScienceFraud
-
This is very meta... essentially someone who is in the business of writing fake papers has written a fake paper criticizing Pubpeer and post publication peer review as being vulnerable to “misuse” and “hyper-skepticism.
#RetractionWatch #AcademicIntegrity #ResearchMisconduct #ScholarlyPublishing #PostPublicationReview #PubPeer #FakeScience #MetaScience #PeerReview #ScienceFraud
-
This is very meta... essentially someone who is in the business of writing fake papers has written a fake paper criticizing Pubpeer and post publication peer review as being vulnerable to “misuse” and “hyper-skepticism.
#RetractionWatch #AcademicIntegrity #ResearchMisconduct #ScholarlyPublishing #PostPublicationReview #PubPeer #FakeScience #MetaScience #PeerReview #ScienceFraud
-
This is very meta... essentially someone who is in the business of writing fake papers has written a fake paper criticizing Pubpeer and post publication peer review as being vulnerable to “misuse” and “hyper-skepticism.
#RetractionWatch #AcademicIntegrity #ResearchMisconduct #ScholarlyPublishing #PostPublicationReview #PubPeer #FakeScience #MetaScience #PeerReview #ScienceFraud
-
...no longer accessible, preventing #postpublicationreview.
Requiring publication of data and code raises the bar for authors and prevents errors. It is a double-edged sword that helps editors. It reduces the number of manuscripts that authors submit, because those who do not want to make the effort seek other publication opportunities, and most importantly: you will keep out the dodgy manuscripts reporting results that are not verifiable and not well-documented. -
...no longer accessible, preventing #postpublicationreview.
Requiring publication of data and code raises the bar for authors and prevents errors. It is a double-edged sword that helps editors. It reduces the number of manuscripts that authors submit, because those who do not want to make the effort seek other publication opportunities, and most importantly: you will keep out the dodgy manuscripts reporting results that are not verifiable and not well-documented. -
...no longer accessible, preventing #postpublicationreview.
Requiring publication of data and code raises the bar for authors and prevents errors. It is a double-edged sword that helps editors. It reduces the number of manuscripts that authors submit, because those who do not want to make the effort seek other publication opportunities, and most importantly: you will keep out the dodgy manuscripts reporting results that are not verifiable and not well-documented. -
...no longer accessible, preventing #postpublicationreview.
Requiring publication of data and code raises the bar for authors and prevents errors. It is a double-edged sword that helps editors. It reduces the number of manuscripts that authors submit, because those who do not want to make the effort seek other publication opportunities, and most importantly: you will keep out the dodgy manuscripts reporting results that are not verifiable and not well-documented. -
...no longer accessible, preventing #postpublicationreview.
Requiring publication of data and code raises the bar for authors and prevents errors. It is a double-edged sword that helps editors. It reduces the number of manuscripts that authors submit, because those who do not want to make the effort seek other publication opportunities, and most importantly: you will keep out the dodgy manuscripts reporting results that are not verifiable and not well-documented.