home.social

#politicalspeech — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #politicalspeech, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Air Force Major Who Called for Trump’s Impeachment Is in Solitary Confinement 24 Hours a Day

    https://www.commondreams.org/news/jason-watson-solitary-confinement

    cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/85583

    Air Force Maj. Jason Watson was arrested July 1 on the steps of the US Capitol after calling for the impeachment of President Donald Trump. According to his lawyer, he's now being held in solitary confinement 24 hours a day in what some legal experts say could amount to illegal pretrial punishment.

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) contains provisions barring officers from engaging in public political activities that are typically protected for civilians, including criticizing the president and other elected officials.

    Prosecutors have charged Watson with violating them when he participated in a news conference calling for Trump to be removed from office over his launching of military actions against Iran, Cuba, and Venezuela without congressional authorization.

    After the speech, Watson stood on the Capitol steps holding a sign that read “Impeach, Convict, Remove" and was arrested after he refused to move.

    Before he was charged, Watson gave a CNN interview on August 17 in which he continued to criticize Trump, accusing him of "flagrantly violating the Constitution" and "breaking the law."

    He acknowledged that he could face severe consequences as a result of his speech: "We just have to be willing to accept that we can change what is happening in our country if we are just willing to pay a price for it," he said.

    One day later, he was arrested while on duty and taken into pretrial confinement. He now faces a general court-martial, the military's most severe trial, which is capable of imposing lengthy prison sentences.

    On Friday, Watson's lawyer, Christopher Mutimer, told CNN that after nearly two months, Watson is "still in solitary confinement 24 hours a day," which he said amounted to "cruel and unusual" punishment.

    "Even if he gets an hour to eat or to exercise, he is alone," Mutimer said. "He is literally by himself, with his thoughts, in a room where the light never turns off all day."

    In an essay published Sunday by writer Monte Mader, Watson himself acknowledged spending his days in isolation, revealing that his Bible had only recently been returned to him and that he had little access to news.

    Watson described the conditions of his confinement as the reality one must accept when choosing to engage in nonviolent resistance.

    “Walking this path," he said, "means exposing oneself to violence while refusing to retaliate against it.”

    After his July 1 protest, Watson had been restricted to Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling in Washington. Though the base reportedly has a confinement facility, following his detention, he was instead moved to a county jail in Maryland.

    During Watson's September 18 preliminary hearing, Maj. Joshua Wendell, the hearing officer, said Watson could not be confined with civilians and was therefore kept in solitary confinement.

    "He was placed in confinement because of the law, which puts him in solitary confinement," Wendell said, according to Stars and Stripes.

    Article 13 of the UCMJ "forbids punishing a service member before trial and forbids pretrial restraint more rigorous than the circumstances require."

    Mutimer has pointed out that solitary confinement is "usually reserved for individuals who are disobeying or are violent, and injuring other people," and usually only for "a day or two, or a week." Watson, he said, has "been in there for months now."

    Rachel VanLandingham, a former Air Force judge advocate and professor of law at Southwestern Law School, told Common Dreams that this "seems to be a blatant case of illegal pretrial punishment given that the nature of his pretrial restraint does not seem necessary to either ensure his presence at trial or to prevent foreseeable serious criminal misconduct."

    “Solitary confinement is rare, and must be justified,” she said. “What, is the administration so afraid of this major’s words that he cannot talk to anyone?”

    Military defense attorney Cody Harnish, who attended Watson's preliminary hearing, has raised concerns that his detention could be unlawful and that his especially harsh treatment was political in nature.

    "I represent people at court-martial in the military, who are accused of doing some very bad things," he said during an interview this weekend with Meidas Defense. "They are not in pretrial confinement."

    Harnish noted other abnormal aspects of Watson’s preliminary hearing: He was denied the ability to wear his uniform and instead arrived handcuffed, unshaven, and wearing an undershirt, which pointed to the possibility that he was facing degrading treatment.

    He also pointed out that Watson had submitted a request to resign his commission in exchange for avoiding a court-martial, but that the request was denied in 24 hours.

    "Nothing gets processed in the military that fast," he said, suggesting that this could indicate influence from senior Pentagon officials.

    During his second term, Trump has used members of the military for political purposes in ways that have challenged longstanding norms of political neutrality. This has included hosting overtly political rallies before uniformed troops, screening them for ideology, and purging senior military officers deemed disloyal.

    Harnish suggested that the Trump administration was seeking to make an example out of Watson for speaking out against the president.

    "When someone speaks out against this administration in the military," he said, "they're going to crush him to silence anyone else in the ranks from ever thinking about it."

    From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.


    #Jason-Watson #Air-Force #major #Trump-impeachment #impeachment #solitary-confinement #pretrial-confinement #illegal-pretrial-punishment #UCMJ #Article-13 #military-justice #court-martial #political-speech #free-speech #protest #US-Capitol #arrest #military-law #constitutional-violations #Trump-administration #Pentagon #political-retaliation #military-neutrality #censorship #news #Common-Dreams
  2. Opinion: Google Has Become Too Powerful for Democracy to Ignore

    By Cliff Potts | WPS News Opinion

    BAYBAY CITY, LEYTE, Philippines, August 3, 2026 — 0005 PhST

    The question is no longer whether Google has become one of the most influential corporations in human history. That question has already been answered.

    The real question is whether any democratic society should permit a single private corporation to exercise such sweeping control over how information is discovered, distributed, monetized, and preserved.

    Google is no longer merely a search engine.

    Through its parent company, Alphabet, Google controls the world’s dominant search platform, YouTube, the Android operating system, the Google Play Store, one of the largest digital-advertising operations in existence, the Chrome browser, major artificial-intelligence systems, mapping services, analytics, cloud infrastructure, and an extraordinary volume of information about its users.

    Each of those operations is powerful on its own.

    Combined under one corporate roof, they create a digital ecosystem capable of influencing who is found, who earns money, which businesses reach customers, which applications succeed, which publishers remain visible, and which voices effectively disappear.

    That ownership structure creates the opportunity for abuse.

    Google Search can reinforce Google advertising. Android can reinforce Google Search. Chrome can reinforce both. The Play Store can dictate the terms under which software developers reach mobile users. YouTube can determine which videos are recommended, which channels qualify for advertising revenue, and which publishers lose practical access to audiences they spent years building.

    None of this requires a secret meeting in which executives decide to destroy one particular publisher.

    A recommendation system can quietly stop recommending a channel. A search-ranking adjustment can bury a publication. An automated advertising classification can eliminate revenue. An account restriction can remove years of accumulated work.

    The person or organization affected may receive little more than a generic notice—or no useful explanation at all.

    That is an unacceptable amount of unaccountable power.

    Breaking Up Google Is Not a Fringe Proposal

    Calls for structural action against Google are not confined to activists, angry creators, or small publishers.

    In 2024, a federal court found that Google had illegally maintained monopolies in general search services and general search-text advertising. During the remedies phase, the United States Department of Justice proposed measures that included forcing Google to divest Chrome and restricting its use of Android and other products to protect its search dominance.

    The court ultimately rejected the proposed Chrome divestiture. Its final judgment instead prohibited certain exclusive distribution contracts, required Google to provide qualifying competitors with access to specified search and user-interaction data, ordered syndication opportunities for search results and advertising, and established continuing technical oversight.

    Those remedies were significant, but the court’s decision not to order a breakup does not make structural separation an unreasonable idea. It confirms that divestiture was seriously proposed, litigated, and considered within an actual federal antitrust case—not invented in an internet comment section.

    The Justice Department has also won a separate case in which a federal court found that Google unlawfully monopolized important parts of the open-web digital-advertising market. According to the Justice Department, Google’s conduct harmed publishers, competition, and ultimately the consumers who depend upon information distributed across the open web.

    That finding should matter greatly to every independent news organization.

    A company that controls advertising technology while also operating competing services does not occupy the position of a neutral intermediary. It participates in the same market it helps govern.

    Google disputes allegations against it and continues exercising its legal rights in court. It is entitled to do so.

    The public is equally entitled to question whether the company should continue controlling so many interconnected layers of the digital economy.

    Europe Already Calls Alphabet a Gatekeeper

    The European Union has formally designated Alphabet a digital “gatekeeper” under the Digital Markets Act.

    The designation covers core services including Google Search, Google Play, Google Maps, Google Shopping, YouTube, Android, Chrome, and Alphabet’s online-advertising operations.

    The term is appropriate.

    These services do not merely compete within digital markets. They frequently determine how other businesses enter those markets, find customers, collect revenue, and survive.

    The Digital Markets Act attempts to address that power before another decade-long competition case reaches its conclusion. Instead of relying exclusively upon punishment after damage has occurred, it places advance obligations and prohibitions upon companies possessing entrenched control over essential digital services.

    That approach recognizes a basic problem with ordinary antitrust enforcement: by the time a case is investigated, tried, appealed, and remedied, smaller competitors may already be gone.

    A fine imposed years later does not restore a publication that closed, a developer who abandoned an application, or a creator whose audience disappeared.

    When financial penalties become routine operating expenses, governments must move beyond fines and consider structural remedies.

    The Transparency Failure

    I cannot honestly claim, without reliable supporting data, that most political creators affected by demonetization or reduced distribution are left-wing, progressive, or pro-democracy publishers.

    Progressive creators have accused YouTube of unequal treatment.

    Conservative creators have made the opposite accusation.

    The available public information does not establish which political group experiences the greatest overall harm.

    That absence of evidence does not clear YouTube.

    It exposes the transparency problem.

    Independent researchers cannot adequately determine whether YouTube’s enforcement is politically neutral because the company does not disclose enough channel-level information about recommendation reductions, monetization classifications, automated decisions, reversals, comparative enforcement, and the practical effects of its algorithms.

    YouTube publishes extensive rules governing monetization and advertiser-friendly content. Those policies describe broad categories of material that may receive limited advertising or no advertising.

    They do not necessarily tell an individual publisher why views dropped from thousands to hundreds and then to tens.

    They do not reveal whether a channel stopped appearing in recommendations.

    They do not explain whether an automated system changed its classification of the channel.

    They do not demonstrate whether politically comparable channels received comparable treatment.

    They do not provide the public with enough information to audit a system that helps determine what billions of people see.

    That is the issue.

    A system does not need to ban political speech outright to diminish it. It can simply stop showing that speech to people.

    I Have Watched the Audience Disappear

    This is not an abstract concern for me.

    I have watched my own work receive thousands of views, then hundreds, and eventually numbers in the tens. That decline occurred while the company controlling distribution provided no intelligible explanation of what changed.

    I cannot prove in a courtroom that Google or YouTube politically targeted Cliff Potts.

    I can prove that an opaque, Google-owned system possessed the practical ability to withdraw access to an audience without explaining itself in any meaningful way.

    That alone is a democratic problem.

    It is also an antitrust problem.

    Journalism, political commentary, music, education, and public advocacy increasingly depend upon privately operated systems that can alter distribution without notice. Publishers may technically remain free to speak while being denied any realistic opportunity to be heard.

    Freedom of speech is not a legal guarantee of an audience.

    But when one corporation has acquired extraordinary control over whether an audience can find that speech, elected governments have every right to investigate how that power is being exercised.

    Break Apart the Conflicting Functions

    The answer is not another vague request that YouTube “do better.”

    The ownership structure itself must be examined.

    Search should not reinforce advertising.

    Advertising should not reinforce YouTube.

    Android should not reinforce Search.

    The Play Store should not reinforce every other Google business.

    Chrome should not function as another mechanism for protecting Google’s position.

    Artificial intelligence should not be allowed to absorb information from independent publishers, answer users directly, and then deprive the original publishers of the traffic required to survive.

    Conflicting business functions should be separated.

    Self-preferencing should be prohibited.

    Recommendation and monetization systems should be independently audited.

    Publishers and creators should receive meaningful explanations when distribution or revenue is materially restricted.

    Appeals should be decided by accountable human reviewers rather than disappearing into another automated system.

    Regulators should have access to the records necessary to determine whether enforcement is consistent, discriminatory, anticompetitive, or politically uneven.

    Independent researchers should be permitted to study the effects of recommendation systems without depending entirely upon information selected and released by the company being examined.

    When fines fail to change conduct, structural separation should remain available.

    These are not attacks upon innovation.

    They are protections against concentrated power.

    Democratic societies regulate utilities, financial institutions, telecommunications systems, transportation networks, and other industries capable of affecting the public at enormous scale.

    They should not exempt the corporations governing digital discovery merely because their control is exercised through algorithms instead of physical gates.

    No private company should possess the practical ability to determine who is discovered, who is heard, who earns a living, and who quietly disappears from public view without meaningful explanation or independent oversight.

    Google has become too powerful for democracy to ignore.

    The only remaining question is whether democratic governments will act before that power becomes permanent.

    Sources

    U.S. Department of Justice: Department of Justice Prevails in Landmark Antitrust Case Against Google

    U.S. Department of Justice: Department of Justice Wins Significant Remedies Against Google

    U.S. Department of Justice: United States and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC

    European Commission: Digital Markets Act Designated Gatekeepers

    European Commission: The Digital Markets Act

    YouTube: Channel Monetization Policies

    YouTube: What Kind of Content Can I Monetize?

    Contact Cliff Potts

    Cliff Potts
    Founder, Publisher & Editor
    WPS News
    Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines

    WPS News
    WPS.News

    Bluesky — Preferred Public Contact
    WTFM.LOL

    Occupy 2.5
    Occupy25.com

    Cliff Potts
    CliffPotts.org

    Cliff Potts is also the creator of Cliff Potts & the AI Rebellion, with music available on Spotify, iHeartRadio, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Deezer, TIDAL, Pandora, and other major streaming platforms worldwide.

    For news, commentary, music, and ongoing projects, begin with WPS.News or contact Cliff publicly through Bluesky at WTFM.LOL.

    #algorithmicTransparency #Alphabet #Android #antitrust #BigTechRegulation #Chrome #CliffPotts #Democracy #DepartmentOfJustice #digitalGatekeepers #DigitalMarketsAct #EuropeanUnion #Google #GoogleAdvertising #GoogleBreakup #GoogleMonopoly #GooglePlayStore #GoogleSearch #independentPublishers #journalism #politicalSpeech #recommendationAlgorithms #structuralSeparation #WPSNewsOpinion #YouTube #YouTubeDemonetization
  3. Trump's Election Speech Lacks Evidence of Foreign Interference Claims

    📰 Original title: Disturbing omission in Trump's election speech raises red flags for expert

    🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
    👥 Users: It's clickbait ⚠️

    View full AI summary en.killbait.com/trump-s-electi

    #politics #electioninterference #trumpconspiracytheories #politicalspeech

  4. Trump's Election Speech Lacks Evidence of Foreign Interference Claims

    📰 Original title: Disturbing omission in Trump's election speech raises red flags for expert

    🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
    👥 Users: It's clickbait ⚠️

    View full AI summary en.killbait.com/trump-s-electi

    #politics #electioninterference #trumpconspiracytheories #politicalspeech

  5. Supreme Court Voids Political-Party Spending Caps in GOP Win (2)

    The US Supreme Court threw out longstanding federal limits on spending by political parties in coordination with candidates,…
    #NewsBeep #News #Topstories #broadcastprogramming #Campaignfinance #federalbudget #Headlines #politicalspeech #TopStories #variableinterestentities
    newsbeep.com/619978/

  6. Musk Fraud Claim Valid in $1 Million Giveaway, Magistrate Says

    Elon Musk should face a claim of fraud, but not for breach of contract, from an Arizona voter…
    #UnitedStates #US #USA #breachofcontract #civilfraud #depositions #ElonMusk #Musk #politicalspeech #voterregistration
    europesays.com/3088492/

  7. CW: IndoPol

    Assume to have died when in any form - , , or - is . It's a nonnegotiable precondition!

    This regime promotes in the pretext of '#freedom of ' while unilaterally silencing . An attack on the by those who ascended to power using its provisions - An act of !

    Since you won't defend democracy, what date will it be on the tombstone, ?

    hindustantimes.com/india-news/

  8. State-Based Restrictions on Corporate Political Speech

    Scholar offers state-level strategies to control corporate political speech. Spending to influence federal elections in 2024 exceeded $14…
    #Politics #CorporateGovernance #corporatelaw #firstamendment #politicalspeech #stateregulation
    europesays.com/2969222/

  9. “A rat race is for rats. We’re not rats. We’re human beings.”

    Shipyard union leader James Reid was elected Rector of the University of Glasgow in 1971. He gave his rectorial address #OTD, 28 April, 1972. The New York Times reprinted it, & called it the greatest political speech since the Gettysburg Address. Read it online at

    gla.ac.uk/media/Media_167194_s

    #Scottish #literature #politics #alienation #politicalspeech #Glasgow #GlasgowUniversity #TradesUnions #workingclass #WorkingClassHistory

  10. President Trump addressed House Republicans at his Miami golf resort, emphasizing the difficulty of enacting beneficial policies for the public that conflict with insurance companies' interests. #PoliticalSpeech #InsuranceIndustry

  11. Australian Senator Under Scrutiny for Parliament Remarks

    Australian police are looking into comments made by Senator Lidia Thorpe about burning down Parliament House. The country is talking about what politicians can say.

    #LidiaThorpe, #Australia, #ParliamentHouse, #PoliticalSpeech, #AFP

    newsletter.tf/senator-thorpe-p

  12. Police in Australia are investigating Senator Lidia Thorpe after she made comments about burning down Parliament House. She said her words were just a figure of speech. The country is discussing what is okay for politicians to say.

    #LidiaThorpe, #Australia, #ParliamentHouse, #PoliticalSpeech, #AFP

    newsletter.tf/senator-thorpe-p

  13. “That Senator Kelly may be an ‘unusually staunch individual’ does not minimize his entitlement to be free from reprisal for exercising his First Amendment rights,” Leon wrote. “Senator Kelly was reprimanded for exercising his First Amendment right to speak on matters of public concern.”

    #law #MilitaryLaw #Hegseth #Trump #dictatorship #RevengePolitics #MarkKelly #democracy #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #PoliticalSpeech

  14. Leon, an appointee of President George W. Bush, wrote in a scathing, 29-pg ruling that #Hegseth was trampling over the #FirstAmendment rights of #MarkKelly & that his moves are an impermissible form of government retaliation.

    documentcloud.org/documents/26

    #law #MilitaryLaw #Trump #dictatorship #RevengePolitics #democracy #FreeSpeech #PoliticalSpeech

  15. Together, the #GrandJudy declination & ruling from senior US District Judge Richard Leon represent major impediments to efforts by aides of #Trump to use the levers of government to punish Sen #MarkKelly, a retired Navy captain & former astronaut, over his participation in the video.

    #law #MilitaryLaw #Hegseth #dictatorship #RevengePolitics #democracy #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #PoliticalSpeech

  16. The decision landed 2 days after a #GrandJudy in Washington, DC, declined to approve charges sought by federal prosecutors against the #Arizona senator & several other Democratic lawmakers who taped a video last year warning that “threats to our Constitution” are coming “from right here at home,” & repeatedly implored service members & the intelligence community to “refuse illegal orders.”

    #law #MilitaryLaw #Trump #RevengePolitics #democracy #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #PoliticalSpeech

  17. Judge says #Hegseth is unlawfully retaliating against Sen. #MarkKelly over ‘illegal orders’ video

    ​A federal judge on Thursday shut down #Defense Secretary #PeteHegseth’s attempts to punish Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly over his urging of US service members to refuse illegal orders, ruling that the #Pentagon chief’s actions were unconstitutionally retaliatory.

    #law #MilitaryLaw #Trump #dictatorship #RevengePolitics #democracy #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #PoliticalSpeech
    cnn.com/2026/02/12/politics/ma

  18. Tổng Bí thư Tô Lâm phát biểu bế mạc Đại hội Đảng 14, nhấn mạnh tinh thần đoàn kết, đổi mới và quyết tâm thúc đẩy phát triển bền vững đất nước. Đại hội khép lại với niềm tin vào con đường đã chọn, tiếp tục xây dựng và bảo vệ Tổ quốc trong giai đoạn mới.

    #Politics #ĐạiHộiĐảng14 #TôLâm #TổngBíThư #PhátTriểnBềnVững #ĐoànKết #ĐổiMới #ChínhTrị #Vietnam #PoliticalSpeech

    vietnamnet.vn/dien-van-phat-bi

  19. Noem, Rubio Slammed for ‘Breathtaking’ Free Speech Plot

    A Boston federal judge said he was struck by a “breathtaking” conspiracy involving Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem…
    #UnitedStates #US #USA #education #ImmigrationEnforcement #injunctions #marcorubio #politicalspeech #presumptions #secretaryofstate #unionpoliticalactivity
    europesays.com/2706756/

  20. Michael Bench B" The 'affordable care act is an insult to the people.
    ACA: #AllCostsAccelerated. See the biden set up and the biden pivot
    on lamely construct medical sector regulation. It shows dnc.rnc would
    rather dramatize a squabble than do their job. ACA: #AllCostsAccelerated.
    joe biden is the reason you have term limits.. old whitey caught. Black Man Obama..
    Throw the tomahawk at old bad whitey.

    #PoliticalSpeech
    #BreakingNews
    #Politics

  21. 📧🙈 A judge just ruled that the Education Department’s auto-response #emails were more politically charged than a Twitter spat—violating the First Amendment! Now, bureaucrats everywhere are wondering what happened to the good old days when out-of-office replies just said, "I'm away from my desk." 😂🚪
    npr.org/2025/11/08/nx-s1-56028 #FirstAmendment #EducationDepartment #AutoResponse #PoliticalSpeech #Bureaucracy #HackerNews #ngated

  22. Michael Bench B " Market Congress. You going to let greed rule to ruin again?Rome2 That turn its stupidass christian at fault again.Again. It ruins the buiilding on a bad foundation. Out with it .., end christian republics and turn commonwealth nationally. We're not doingforty more laps in desert for greed sins. Its a Civilization crime to choose greed again. SelfAright Christianishism.ChooseRationality.Not poor impersonation "jesuskings."FaithInJigaboo #PoliticalSpeech #BreakingNews #Politics

  23. Google reverses censorship policies after congressional probe: Google admits Biden administration pressure was "unacceptable" and commits to reinstating thousands of YouTube accounts censored for political speech. ppc.land/google-reverses-censo #Google #Censorship #PoliticalSpeech #YouTube #FreeSpeech

  24. House committee exposes how EU's DSA targets American political speech: Congressional investigation reveals European Union regulators classify common political statements as illegal hate speech under Digital Services Act, potentially affecting global content moderation policies. ppc.land/house-committee-expos #DigitalServicesAct #HateSpeech #ContentModeration #EULaw #PoliticalSpeech

  25. Gavin Newsom's recent speech has ignited fierce backlash from MAGAworld leaders after he boldly labeled Donald Trump as a "dictator," asserting that Trump's handling of protests jeopardizes democracy. This comparison underscores the escalating tensions in U.S. political discourse. To explore this polarizing exchange further, read the full article: thedailybeast.com/maga-erupts- #GavinNewsom #DonaldTrump #MAGA #PoliticalSpeech #Protests #Democracy

  26. “A rat race is for rats. We’re not rats. We’re human beings.”

    Shipyard union leader James Reid was elected Rector of the University of Glasgow in 1971. He gave his rectorial address #OTD, 28 April, 1972. The New York Times reprinted it, & called it the greatest political speech since the Gettysburg Address. Read it online at

    gla.ac.uk/media/Media_167194_s

    #Scottish #literature #politics #alienation #politicalspeech #Glasgow #GlasgowUniversity

  27. eff.org/deeplinks/2025/04/cong

    This bill mandates a notice-and- #takedown system that threatens #freeexpression, #userprivacy, and #dueprocess, without meaningfully addressing the problem it claims to solve. The “takedown” provision applies to a much broader category of content…contains no protections against frivolous or bad-faith takedown requests. Lawful content—including #satire, #journalism, and #politicalspeech—could be wrongly censored.

  28. Judge orders #MahmoudKhalil's case transferred from #Louisiana to #NewJersey

    March 19, 2025

    Excerpt: "Rejecting the administration's bid on Wednesday, District Judge Jesse Furman ruled that, since the district of New Jersey was 'the one and only district in which Khalil could have filed his petition" seeking his release from detention, the case must be transferred there rather than Louisiana.

    "The judge also upheld his 10 March order barring Mr Khalil's deportation while the case continues, but did not rule on his lawyers' request for immediate release.

    "The US justice department has not commented on the ruling.

    "Mr Khalil's lawyer Samah Sisay said in a statement on Wednesday that the government moved him to Louisiana to avoid having the case heard in New York or New Jersey.

    "'Mr Khalil should be free and home with his wife awaiting the birth of their first child, and we will continue to do everything possible to make that happen,' Ms Sisay told Reuters.

    "Mr Khalil's wife, who is a US citizen, is eight months pregnant.

    "His lawyers have argued that he was exercising #FreeSpeech rights to demonstrate in support of #Palestinians in #Gaza and against US support for #Israel. They accused the government of 'open #repression of student #activism and #Politicalspeech'.

    "Trump has previously stated that foreign students found to be 'terrorist sympathisers' would face deportation.

    "Mr Khalil has not been charged with any crime.

    "On Wednesday, Trump deputy chief of staff #StephenMiller said the administration believes "that any foreign nationals visiting our country are prohibited from supporting any designated terrorist organization" such as Hamas."

    Read more:
    bbc.com/news/articles/cwygldgj
    #FreeMahmoudKhalil #FreeMahmoud #SilencingDissent #Authoritarianism #ResistFascism #ResistAuthoritarianism

  29. So Senator Chris Murphy of CT is right: political speech is free speech & detaining or taking someone for it is wrong. Potus & his people are wrong to have done so, & must stop immediately. @chrismurphyct.bsky.social #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #MahmoudKhalil #USpol #HumanRights #PoliticalSpeech

  30. So Senator Chris Murphy of CT is right: political speech is free speech & detaining or taking someone for it is wrong. Potus & his people are wrong to have done so, & must stop immediately. @chrismurphyct.bsky.social #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #MahmoudKhalil #USpol #HumanRights #PoliticalSpeech

  31. So Senator Chris Murphy of CT is right: political speech is free speech and detaining or taking someone for it is wrong.

    Potus and his people are wrong to have done so, and must stop immediately.

    #FirstAmendment #FreeSpeech #MahmoudKhalil #USpol #HumanRights #PoliticalSpeech

  32. They contend that #Trump’s EOs have already cause harm. E.G., the Natl Assn of #Diversity Officers in Higher #Education says the vagueness of the EOs have left members w/ “untenable” choices: certifying that they won’t engage in prohibited #DEI at the risk of getting slapped w/penalties, or censoring themselves to avoid govt scrutiny.
The EOs, the group alleged in a recent court filing, are “breeding fear & already forcing irreversible harm by chilling core #PoliticalSpeech & academic #freedom.”

  33. I'd like to see a constitutional law professor do a thread on all the nasty things an American can say (or otherwise express) about the president that are protected as political speech per prior #SCOTUS jurisprudence.
    —
    #lawfedi #FirstAmendment #PoliticalSpeech

  34. Elon Musk, the world's best known "free speech absolutist", will be denouncing this lawsuit soon, I'm sure.

    Trump sues CBS News over 60 Minutes interview with Harris; network says suit is "completely without merit" - CBS News

    cbsnews.com/news/trump-sues-cb

    #USPolitics #USElection2024 #PoliticalSpeech #FrivilousLawsuits #DonaldTrump #ElonMusk

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.