#philippinesenate — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #philippinesenate, aggregated by home.social.
-
Former president Rodrigo Duterte appears in court in The Hague
(UPD…
#Netherlands #Nederland #NL #Europe #Europa #EU #TheHague #crimesagainsthumanity #drugcrackdowns #Dutchcourt #Dutertearrest #dutertetrial #FerdinandMarcosJr. #HumanRights #ICCinvestigation #ICCproceedings #impeachmenttrial #internationalcriminalcourt #masskillings #PhilippineSenate #Philippinewithdrawal #Philippines #RodrigoDuterte #RomeStatute #VicePresidentSaraDuterte #warondrugs
https://www.europesays.com/netherlands/49175/ -
Iran and Ukraine address the UN today, Philippines moves closer to impeaching VP Duterte, Ethiopia on the brink of new conflict
At the UN podium today: Iran and Ukraine The presidents of two different countries currently at war with…
#Ukraine #UA #Europe #Europa #EU #News #Iran #MasoudPezeshkian #PhilippineSenate #PresidentDonaldTrump #PresidentFerdinandMarcos #SaraDuterte #VolodymyrZelensky
https://www.europesays.com/ukraine/46617/ -
https://www.europesays.com/iran/303871/ Iran and Ukraine address the UN today, Philippines moves closer to impeaching VP Duterte, Ethiopia on the brink of new conflict #Iran #MasoudPezeshkian #PhilippineSenate #PresidentDonaldTrump #PresidentFerdinandMarcos #SaraDuterte #Ukraine #VolodymyrZelensky
-
Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte appears in court in The Hague
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte made his first public appearance in over a…
#Netherlands #Nederland #NL #Europe #Europa #EU #TheHague #attemptedmurder #internationalcriminalcourt #masskillings #PhilippineSenate #RodrigoDuterte
https://www.europesays.com/netherlands/46621/ -
Sara Duterte Trial Moves Through Alias Fight as Grave Threats Case Runs Beside Impeachment
By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief, WPS News
BAYBAY CITY, LEYTE, Philippines, September 7, 2026Support WPS News:
https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNewsReporting
The impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte resumed Monday with the Senate impeachment court still focused on Article I, the confidential-funds case, while the separate grave threats case against Duterte continued to hang over the proceedings.
The newest trial issue is the use of aliases in confidential-fund transactions. The Philippine News Agency reported Monday that aliases in confidential-fund documents triggered a new dispute over the burden of proof in the impeachment trial. That matters because the prosecution has been trying to show that questionable names and unsupported liquidation documents weaken Duterte’s explanation of how confidential funds were used. The defense, in turn, is pushing back on how much prosecutors must prove and whether the use of aliases is enough to establish misuse or misappropriation (Philippine News Agency, 2026a).
Philstar’s live coverage of Day 22 reported that the Senate resumed Duterte’s impeachment trial at 10 a.m. Monday, September 7. The same coverage noted that Sen. Imee Marcos questioned Michael Poa on how, as chief of staff to then-Education Secretary Duterte, he could claim no involvement in confidential funds until the Commission on Audit became involved (Philstar.com, 2026a).
That keeps the DepEd side of the case alive. Poa has already testified that he had no personal knowledge of how the DepEd confidential funds were actually used, while prosecutors have continued trying to connect officials, paperwork, and fund releases into a coherent chain of responsibility.
Grave Threats Case Continues Separately
The other major development remains Duterte’s separate criminal grave threats case. Reuters reported that Duterte posted bail Saturday after a trial court ordered her arrest on three counts of grave threats tied to her 2024 remarks involving President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez. Bail was set at ₱120,000 per count, or ₱360,000 total (Reuters, 2026a).
That criminal case is separate from the impeachment trial, but it overlaps with the impeachment article involving Duterte’s alleged threats. The important new point is that Senate officials and legal commentators are emphasizing that the two proceedings can continue separately.
Pilipino Star Ngayon reported that the impeachment court clarified that double jeopardy does not apply because impeachment proceedings are separate and different from criminal cases. In plain English, Duterte can face a Senate impeachment trial and a criminal grave threats case without one automatically blocking the other (Pilipino Star Ngayon, 2026).
Senate President Sherwin Gatchalian also said the grave threats case has no effect on the impeachment trial. Radyo Pilipinas reported that Gatchalian described the criminal case and impeachment case as separate proceedings, while also urging authorities to take Duterte’s claims about threats to her safety seriously (Radyo Pilipinas, 2026).
Political Analysis
The clean read is this: the impeachment trial did not stop because of the grave threats case, and the grave threats case did not disappear because of the impeachment trial.
That is the real update. Duterte is now fighting on two tracks. In the Senate, the case remains centered on confidential funds, aliases, liquidation documents, and whether prosecutors can prove that public money was mishandled. In the criminal court, the grave threats case is moving separately after the arrest order and bail.
The alias fight is important because it goes to the heart of the confidential-funds defense. Confidential operations may require secrecy, but secrecy cannot mean the government never has to prove who received public money or why. If the prosecution can show that aliases, receipts, and missing documents point to fake or unsupported transactions, Article I gets stronger. If the defense can show that aliases were normal, lawful, and tied to real confidential work, then the prosecution’s case weakens.
For WPS News, the useful headline is simple: the case is no longer just one impeachment story. It is now an impeachment trial, a criminal grave threats case, and a broader fight over whether confidential-fund secrecy can survive audit scrutiny.
APA-Style Source List:
Philippine News Agency. (2026a, September 7). Alias issue sparks burden of proof clash in VP Sara trial.
Philstar.com. (2026a, September 7). LIVE Coverage: Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial, Sept. 7.
Pilipino Star Ngayon. (2026, September 7). Prinsipyo ng “double jeopardy” ’di angkop sa kaso ni VP Sara.
Radyo Pilipinas. (2026, September 7). Grave threats case ni VP Sara Duterte, walang epekto sa impeachment trial — Senate President Sherwin Gatchalian.
Reuters. (2026a, September 5). Philippine VP Duterte posts bail after arrest order for alleged grave threats.
#confidentialFunds #graveThreats #impeachmentTrial #MichaelPoa #PhilippineSenate #SaraDuterte #WPSNews -
Sara Duterte Trial Tightens Around the Confidential-Funds Chain
By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief, WPS News
BAYBAY CITY, LEYTE, Philippines, August 29, 2026 — 0705 PHSTSupport WPS News:
https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNewsThe Trial Is Still About the Money
Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial is still grinding through Article I, the confidential-funds case, and the latest hearings have narrowed the public question to something simple: who knew where the money went?
That is not a small question. Article I accuses Duterte of misusing ₱612.5 million in confidential funds: ₱500 million from the Office of the Vice President and ₱112.5 million from the Department of Education, where she previously served as secretary. After weeks of receipts, audit findings, bank records, and testimony, the case is no longer just about whether public money was released. The question is who controlled it, who handled it, who claimed to spend it, and whether the paperwork can prove any of it. (Vera Files, 2026)
Lachica Becomes Central
The name now sitting near the middle of the money trail is Col. Raymund Dante Lachica, former head of the Vice Presidential Security and Protection Group.
Former OVP special disbursing officer Gina Acosta previously testified that she encashed confidential-fund checks and turned over the full ₱500 million to Lachica on Duterte’s instructions. BusinessMirror reported that OVP Assistant Secretary Lemuel Ortonio also testified that Lachica was not an OVP employee but handled confidential funds, based on the information Ortonio relied on in responding to audit issues. (BusinessMirror, 2026)
That testimony matters because it creates a chain: public money was released, encashed, and allegedly transferred to a security official who was not the formal disbursing officer. The defense can still argue that this was part of a confidential-fund process, not proof of misuse. But prosecutors are clearly trying to show that the actual handling of the money bypassed ordinary accountability structures.
The Alias Problem Continues
The trial has also returned repeatedly to the use of aliases and questionable names in confidential-fund documents.
Philstar reported that Acosta testified she did not know who recipients listed as “Pusa” and “Pagong” really were, and that she relied on Lachica’s fund-utilization reports rather than personally witnessing payments to those supposed recipients. (Philstar, 2026a)
That is the part ordinary readers can understand. Confidential funds may require secrecy, but secrecy is not the same thing as blank-check government. If the records list aliases, the Senate still has to know whether those aliases correspond to actual operations, actual people, and actual public purposes.
Court Warns Against Trial by Press Release
The Senate impeachment court is also tightening control over public comments.
The Philippine News Agency reported that Presiding Officer Francis “Chiz” Escudero put Duterte “on notice” after she issued a public statement while the court was announcing stricter enforcement of Rule 18, which restricts public comments about pending trial matters. (Philippine News Agency, 2026a)
Philstar reported that the impeachment court ruled it would impose penalties on parties making public remarks about the case, the same day Duterte accused prosecutors of relying on “political theatrics.” (Philstar, 2026b)
That does not decide the case, but it changes the atmosphere. The Senate is signaling that it does not want the impeachment trial fought entirely through press conferences, social media posts, and political slogans. That is good in theory. In practice, it will only work if the rule is enforced evenly.
Poa May Take the Stand
The next important turn may involve Michael Wesley Poa, Duterte’s defense spokesperson and former Department of Education official.
The Philippine News Agency reported that prosecutors plan to present Poa and Philippine Statistics Authority Assistant National Statistician Marizza Grande as witnesses next week in connection with the DepEd confidential-funds portion of Article I. The House prosecution says Poa’s testimony is relevant to the alleged misuse of the ₱112.5 million in DepEd confidential funds. (Philippine News Agency, 2026b)
The House prosecution has also said it will seek to treat Poa as a hostile witness. That is notable because Poa is not simply a former official. He is part of Duterte’s public-facing defense operation. If the Senate allows that line of testimony, the DepEd portion of the trial could become more politically and legally complicated.
What It Means
The clean read is this: the trial is not exploding, collapsing, or ending. It is tightening.
The case now sits on a practical question: can the prosecution prove that confidential funds were not merely released, but mishandled, misused, or covered by unreliable paperwork? The defense will argue that confidential-fund work does not look like ordinary spending and that audit gaps are not automatic proof of impeachable misconduct.
That is the real fight. Not the noise. Not the slogans. Not the online cheering sections.
If the money trail holds, the case becomes much harder for Duterte to dismiss as politics alone. If the chain breaks, the prosecution may be left with suspicious paperwork and not enough proof. For now, the Senate is still following the money — and the names, aliases, signatures, and witnesses attached to it.
APA-Style Source List:BusinessMirror. (2026, August 26). Sara security chief Lachica not OVP employee but handled confidential funds.
Philippine News Agency. (2026a, August 26). Impeachment court puts VP Sara on notice over trial remarks.
Philippine News Agency. (2026b, August 26). Prosecution to present Poa, PSA exec in VP Sara impeachment trial.
Philstar.com. (2026a, August 24). Sara Duterte trial recap, Aug. 24: More aliases on receipts, cash trail to Sara’s guard.
Philstar.com. (2026b, August 26). Sara Duterte trial recap, Aug. 26: Sub judice ruling, “Lachica spent funds.”
Vera Files. (2026, August 28). Sara Duterte impeachment trial, Week 8: Who knew where the confidential funds went?
#confidentialFunds #impeachmentTrial #MichaelPoa #PhilippineSenate #RaymundLachica #SaraDuterte #WPSNews -
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·Bill postponing barangay and SK polls, fixing officials’ term reaches Senate plenary
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·Bill postponing barangay and SK polls, fixing officials’ term reaches Senate plenary
-
Sara Duterte Trial Faces Schedule Shift as Confidential-Funds Case Drags On
By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief, WPS News
BAYBAY CITY, LEYTE, Philippines, August 24, 2026 — 0705 PHSTSupport WPS News:
https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNewsThe Trial Keeps Moving, But Slowly
Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial is still moving through the Senate, but the latest developments are less about courtroom fireworks and more about pace, scheduling, and the slow grind of the confidential-funds case.
The House prosecution panel is now backing a proposal to move impeachment hearings to 3 p.m. onward and add Friday trial days to make up for delays. According to the Philippine News Agency, the proposal followed weather-related disruptions that forced the Senate impeachment court to miss proceedings while prosecutors were still presenting evidence under Article I, the article covering Duterte’s alleged misuse and irregular liquidation of ₱612.5 million in confidential funds (Philippine News Agency, 2026a).
That is the plain-English update: no verdict, no collapse, no dismissal. The trial is alive, but it is dragging, and the Senate is now looking for ways to keep the case from being swallowed by weather, legislative work, and calendar pressure.
Article I Still Dominates
The center of the trial remains Article I, the confidential-funds case. That article covers the alleged misuse of ₱500 million in confidential funds from the Office of the Vice President and ₱112.5 million from the Department of Education, where Duterte previously served as secretary.
The prosecution has been building that case with documents, audit findings, bank records, and testimony from people tied to the handling of those funds. Earlier this month, the House prosecution panel brought 15 boxes of documentary evidence to the Senate impeachment court, describing the records as part of its effort to trace the confidential-funds trail (Philippine News Agency, 2026b).
That is not glamorous television, but it is probably where the case lives or dies. The Senate is not being asked merely to judge political speeches or public anger. It is being asked to decide whether the paperwork, withdrawals, liquidation documents, and audit findings prove impeachable misconduct.
Prosecutors Claim a Pattern
The prosecution has also begun framing the fund handling as a possible pattern rather than a one-time paperwork mess. The Philippine News Agency reported that House prosecutors pointed to testimony from former OVP special disbursing officer Gina Acosta and described Duterte as “calling the shots” in the handling of the ₱125 million confidential-fund release (Philippine News Agency, 2026c).
That matters because the prosecution needs more than sloppy documentation. It needs to show responsibility, control, and intent strongly enough to convince senator-judges that the irregularities rise to impeachable conduct.
The defense, for its part, can still argue that confidential-fund rules are complicated, that audit findings are not automatic proof of guilt, and that the prosecution is stretching paperwork disputes into a political conviction effort. That is the real fight under all the noise.
No Trade-Off, Prosecutors Say
The political rumor mill is also running. Prosecutors have denied talk of a supposed trade-off involving Duterte resigning in exchange for being allowed to run in 2028. PNA reported that the House prosecution said it would press ahead with the impeachment trial regardless of such reports (Philippine News Agency, 2026d).
That denial is worth noting because it shows how much of this trial is happening outside the formal courtroom. There is the evidence fight inside the Senate, and then there is the political fight over whether Duterte remains viable for 2028.
Finish Before December?
The House side is also looking at the calendar. A House press release said prosecutors are targeting an end-September wrap-up for their evidence presentation and support finishing the trial before December, though Senate leadership has acknowledged the proceedings could still spill into next year (House of Representatives, 2026).
That is the big picture now: the prosecution wants speed, the Senate needs order, and the defense benefits from time if delay weakens public attention or political momentum.
For WPS News, the clean read is this: the Sara Duterte impeachment trial is no longer in its opening-drama phase. It is in the long, tedious, essential phase where records, testimony, and scheduling discipline decide whether the case becomes a serious accountability proceeding or collapses into another Philippine political marathon.
APA-Style Source List:
House of Representatives of the Philippines. (2026, August 21). House prosecution targets end-September evidence wrap-up, backs VP Sara trial completion before December.
Philippine News Agency. (2026a, August 19). Prosecution backs 3 p.m. impeachment hearings, Friday trial day.
Philippine News Agency. (2026b, August 3). Prosecution presents 15 boxes containing confidential fund records.
Philippine News Agency. (2026c, August 18). Prosecution: VP Sara “calling the shots” in ₱125M secret fund handling.
Philippine News Agency. (2026d, August 17). No “trade-off” on VP Sara impeachment – prosecution.
#confidentialFunds #DepartmentOfEducation #impeachmentTrial #OfficeOfTheVicePresident #PhilippineSenate #SaraDuterte #WPSNews -
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·PNP: 74 cases linked to nihilistic violent extremism, 42 minors rescued so far
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
PNP: 74 cases linked to nihilistic violent extremism, 42 minors rescued so far
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
PNP: 74 cases linked to nihilistic violent extremism, 42 minors rescued so far
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·PNP: 74 cases linked to nihilistic violent extremism, 42 minors rescued so far
-
Sara Duterte Trial Pauses for SONA, Returns to the Money Trail
By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief, WPS News
BAYBAY CITY, LEYTE, Philippines, July 27, 2026 — 0935 PHSTSupport WPS News:
https://www.patreon.com/cw/WPSNewsTrial Pauses, But the Case Does Not
Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial is temporarily paused for President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s State of the Nation Address, but the case itself has not slowed down. The next real movement comes Wednesday, July 29, when the Senate impeachment court is expected to resume hearings and turn back toward the confidential-funds allegations at the center of the prosecution’s money-trail case.
The court suspended proceedings for July 27 and 28 because of the SONA schedule and related political activities. According to the Philippine News Agency, Presiding Officer Francis “Chiz” Escudero said the next trial date will be July 29, with proceedings set to run from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., followed by the regular Senate session at 4 p.m. (Philippine News Agency, 2026a).
The Money Trail Takes Center Stage
The important development is that the trial is now shifting away from the earlier Article IV presentation involving Duterte’s alleged threats and toward Article I, which focuses on the alleged misuse and irregular disbursement of confidential funds.
House prosecutors are expected to present two former Land Bank of the Philippines branch managers when the trial resumes. PNA reported that former LandBank Shaw Boulevard branch manager Violeta Constantino and former LandBank Department of Education branch manager Nenita Camposano have been directed to appear in connection with Article I, which covers Duterte’s alleged misuse of confidential funds while serving as vice president and education secretary (Philippine News Agency, 2026b).
Philstar reported that House prosecutors plan to present three witnesses next week on the alleged misuse of ₱612.5 million in confidential funds. That figure includes ₱500 million from the Office of the Vice President and ₱112.5 million from the Department of Education (Philstar, 2026).
Financial Records Fight Continues
The prosecution also won a major procedural victory when the Senate impeachment court approved subpoenas for financial records connected to Duterte, her husband Manases Carpio, and several linked entities. Reuters reported that the subpoenas cover records sought by prosecutors as they try to prove allegations of unexplained wealth, although the court placed limits on the request and noted that the documents are meant to establish a financial baseline rather than introduce new charges (Reuters, 2026).
That distinction matters. The prosecution wants bank, tax, and financial records to support its broader case. The defense argues that the requests amount to overreach and political fishing. The Senate court has now allowed part of that records fight to move forward, while still keeping some limits in place.
What To Watch Next
The next stage is not flashy, but it may be decisive. The early phase of the trial gave the public video evidence and political drama. The next phase gives the court documents, banking witnesses, fund releases, and liquidation questions.
That is where this trial either becomes a serious accountability case or starts to look like a political weapon with paperwork attached. The politics are still unavoidable. Duterte remains a likely 2028 presidential contender, and conviction could remove her from office and bar her from future public office. But the Senate now has to deal with evidence, not just rhetoric.
For WPS News, the clean read is this: the impeachment trial is paused for SONA, but the real fight resumes July 29. The case is now headed directly into the money trail, and that is where prosecutors must prove whether the confidential-funds allegations can survive contact with the records.
Sidebar: What Is SONA?
SONA stands for State of the Nation Address. In the Philippines, it is the president’s annual speech to Congress and the country. It is required under Article VII, Section 23 of the 1987 Constitution, which says the president must address Congress at the opening of its regular session. In practice, that usually happens on the fourth Monday of July (Presidential Management Staff, 2026; Presidential Communications Office, 2023).
For readers outside the Philippines, think of it as the Philippine version of the U.S. State of the Union address, but tied to the opening of Congress’ regular session. The president reports on the condition of the country, highlights administration priorities, and often lays out proposed legislation or policy goals for the coming year.
That is why the Sara Duterte impeachment trial paused around SONA. The speech is not just a televised political event. It is a major constitutional and legislative moment, bringing the president, senators, representatives, Cabinet officials, diplomats, security forces, protesters, and national media into the same political space at the same time.
APA-Style Source List:Philippine News Agency. (2026a, July 21). Court resets impeachment calendar for post-SONA phase.
Philippine News Agency. (2026b, July 23). 2 former LandBank managers to testify on VP Sara impeachment trial.
Philstar. (2026, July 24). Bank managers to testify at impeach trial.
Presidential Communications Office. (2023, July 21). FilipiKnows: Things Filipinos should know about the SONA.
Presidential Management Staff. (2026). State of the Nation Address.
Reuters. (2026, July 20). Prosecutors win subpoenas for Philippine vice president Duterte’s financial records in impeachment case.
#ChizEscudero #confidentialFunds #FerdinandMarcosJr #History #Impeachment #impeachmentTrial #LandBank #ManasesCarpio #news #PhilippineSenate #Philippines #PhilippinesPolitics #Politics #SaraDuterte #SONA #StateOfTheNationAddress -
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
[Rappler’s Best] A troll in the Senate
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
[Rappler’s Best] A troll in the Senate
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
What’s OSINT, hash values? Impeachment trial shows nuances in preserving digital evidence
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
What’s OSINT, hash values? Impeachment trial shows nuances in preserving digital evidence
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
What’s OSINT, hash values? Impeachment trial shows nuances in preserving digital evidence
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
What’s OSINT, hash values? Impeachment trial shows nuances in preserving digital evidence
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
Stage set for historic Sara Duterte trial, with her 2028 dreams on the line
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
Stage set for historic Sara Duterte trial, with her 2028 dreams on the line
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
[Rappler’s Best] Sarangani, not your senators’ antics, needs your attention
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
[Rappler’s Best] Sarangani, not your senators’ antics, needs your attention
-
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
[Rappler’s Best] Sarangani, not your senators’ antics, needs your attention
-
Sen. Alan Cayetano becomes Philippines’ second shortest-serving Senate President
-
Sen. Alan Cayetano becomes Philippines’ second shortest-serving Senate President
-
The basketball escape
I went to the market the other day, and instead of talking about vegetables, both vendors and fellow…
#NewsBeep #News #Basketball #AU #Australia #basketballescape #essay #gmaregionaltvnews #gmaregionaltv.com #Hoops #howieseverino #philippinesenate #sports
https://www.newsbeep.com/au/724926/ -
RAPPLER | Philippine & World News | Investigative Journalism | Data | Civic Engagement | Public Interest [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·
Zubiri on why he joined Senate minority: 4 traitors in majority
-
Philippine Senator Evades ICC Arrest; Senate Becomes Sanctuary
Senator Ronald dela Rosa is hiding in the Philippine Senate after the ICC issued an arrest warrant for crimes against humanity. This affects the Senate's operations and his legal standing.
#BatoDelaRosa, #ICCArestWarrant, #PhilippineSenate, #CrimesAgainstHumanity, #DrugWar
https://newsletter.tf/senator-dela-rosa-hides-in-senate-after-icc-warrant/
-
Senator Dela Rosa is now inside the Senate building, which is surrounded by police, after an ICC arrest warrant was issued. This is a serious legal situation for the Senator.
#BatoDelaRosa, #ICCArestWarrant, #PhilippineSenate, #CrimesAgainstHumanity, #DrugWar
https://newsletter.tf/senator-dela-rosa-hides-in-senate-after-icc-warrant/ -
Tulfo proposes one-month income tax holiday amid flood control fund anomalies
-
Tulfo proposes one-month income tax holiday amid flood control fund anomalies
-
Sen. Jinggoy files complaint vs ex-Bulacan Engineer Brice Hernandez
-
Sen. Jinggoy files complaint vs ex-Bulacan Engineer Brice Hernandez
-
Senate Pushes for House Arrest for Duterte Amid ICC Trial
-
Senate Pushes for House Arrest for Duterte Amid ICC Trial
-
Senate Pushes for House Arrest for Duterte Amid ICC Trial