#peterattia — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #peterattia, aggregated by home.social.
-
Peter Attia Resigns as CBS News Contributor Following Release of Epstein-Related Emails
📰 Original title: Celebrity doctor Peter Attia steps down from CBS over Epstein links
🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
👥 Usuarios: It's clickbait ⚠️View full AI summary: https://killbait.com/posts/post/fe255dc0-5d22-4243-ba7d-089b926517c0
-
#PeterAttia Bows Out At #CBS News Over Alleged Ties With #Epstein #tyt #yt
-
#PeterAttia Bows Out At #CBS News Over Alleged Ties With #Epstein #tyt #yt
-
#PeterAttia Bows Out At #CBS News Over Alleged Ties With #Epstein #tyt #yt
-
#PeterAttia Bows Out At #CBS News Over Alleged Ties With #Epstein #tyt #yt
-
#PeterAttia Bows Out At #CBS News Over Alleged Ties With #Epstein #tyt #yt
-
A newly released trove of documents from the #Epsteinfiles, #PeterAttia and the convicted sex offender exchanged lewd and personal messages with each other For example, Attia wrote in 2016, “Pussy is, indeed, low-carb. Still awaiting results on gluten content.though” www.cnn.com/2026/02/23/b...
Peter Attia resigns from CBS N... -
A newly released trove of documents from the #Epsteinfiles, #PeterAttia and the convicted sex offender exchanged lewd and personal messages with each other For example, Attia wrote in 2016, “Pussy is, indeed, low-carb. Still awaiting results on gluten content.though” www.cnn.com/2026/02/23/b...
Peter Attia resigns from CBS N... -
A newly released trove of documents from the #Epsteinfiles, #PeterAttia and the convicted sex offender exchanged lewd and personal messages with each other For example, Attia wrote in 2016, “Pussy is, indeed, low-carb. Still awaiting results on gluten content.though” www.cnn.com/2026/02/23/b...
Peter Attia resigns from CBS N... -
Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Gig After Epstein Files Disclosure
#News #Politics #BariWeiss #CBSNews #ElectionLine #PeterAttiahttps://deadline.com/2026/02/peter-attia-cbs-news-exit-1236733585/
-
Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Gig After Epstein Files Disclosure
#News #Politics #BariWeiss #CBSNews #ElectionLine #PeterAttiahttps://deadline.com/2026/02/peter-attia-cbs-news-exit-1236733585/
-
Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Gig After Epstein Files Disclosure
#News #Politics #BariWeiss #CBSNews #ElectionLine #PeterAttiahttps://deadline.com/2026/02/peter-attia-cbs-news-exit-1236733585/
-
Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Gig After Epstein Files Disclosure
#News #Politics #BariWeiss #CBSNews #ElectionLine #PeterAttiahttps://deadline.com/2026/02/peter-attia-cbs-news-exit-1236733585/
-
Dr. Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Pact Following Epstein Controversy As Paramount Skydance Makes New Pitch for Warner
#Variety #News #BariWeiss #CBSNews #PeterAttia -
Dr. Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Pact Following Epstein Controversy As Paramount Skydance Makes New Pitch for Warner
#Variety #News #BariWeiss #CBSNews #PeterAttia -
Dr. Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Pact Following Epstein Controversy As Paramount Skydance Makes New Pitch for Warner
#Variety #News #BariWeiss #CBSNews #PeterAttia -
Dr. Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Pact Following Epstein Controversy As Paramount Skydance Makes New Pitch for Warner
#Variety #News #BariWeiss #CBSNews #PeterAttia -
Dr. Peter Attia Exits CBS News Contributor Pact Following Epstein Controversy As Paramount Skydance Makes New Pitch for Warner
#Variety #News #BariWeiss #CBSNews #PeterAttia -
Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Hollywood: The Stars, Moguls, Directors, Producers and Fixers in His Orbit
#GeneralNews #News #BarryDiller #Barryjosephson #BrettRatner #Caseywasserman #ChelseaHandler #ChrisTucker #Davidcopperfield #EpsteinFiles #JeffreyEpstein #Matthewhiltzik #MichaelOvitz #NaomiCampbell #Peggysiegal #Peterattia #SoonYiPrevin #SteveTisch #TomBarrack #TommyMottola #WoodyAllenhttps://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/jeffrey-epstein-hollywood-orbit-1236508954/
-
Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Hollywood: The Stars, Moguls, Directors, Producers and Fixers in His Orbit
#GeneralNews #News #BarryDiller #Barryjosephson #BrettRatner #Caseywasserman #ChelseaHandler #ChrisTucker #Davidcopperfield #EpsteinFiles #JeffreyEpstein #Matthewhiltzik #MichaelOvitz #NaomiCampbell #Peggysiegal #Peterattia #SoonYiPrevin #SteveTisch #TomBarrack #TommyMottola #WoodyAllenhttps://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/jeffrey-epstein-hollywood-orbit-1236508954/
-
Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Hollywood: The Stars, Moguls, Directors, Producers and Fixers in His Orbit
#GeneralNews #News #BarryDiller #Barryjosephson #BrettRatner #Caseywasserman #ChelseaHandler #ChrisTucker #Davidcopperfield #EpsteinFiles #JeffreyEpstein #Matthewhiltzik #MichaelOvitz #NaomiCampbell #Peggysiegal #Peterattia #SoonYiPrevin #SteveTisch #TomBarrack #TommyMottola #WoodyAllenhttps://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/jeffrey-epstein-hollywood-orbit-1236508954/
-
Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Hollywood: The Stars, Moguls, Directors, Producers and Fixers in His Orbit
#GeneralNews #News #BarryDiller #Barryjosephson #BrettRatner #Caseywasserman #ChelseaHandler #ChrisTucker #Davidcopperfield #EpsteinFiles #JeffreyEpstein #Matthewhiltzik #MichaelOvitz #NaomiCampbell #Peggysiegal #Peterattia #SoonYiPrevin #SteveTisch #TomBarrack #TommyMottola #WoodyAllenhttps://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/jeffrey-epstein-hollywood-orbit-1236508954/
-
Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Hollywood: The Stars, Moguls, Directors, Producers and Fixers in His Orbit
#GeneralNews #News #BarryDiller #Barryjosephson #BrettRatner #Caseywasserman #ChelseaHandler #ChrisTucker #Davidcopperfield #EpsteinFiles #JeffreyEpstein #Matthewhiltzik #MichaelOvitz #NaomiCampbell #Peggysiegal #Peterattia #SoonYiPrevin #SteveTisch #TomBarrack #TommyMottola #WoodyAllenhttps://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/jeffrey-epstein-hollywood-orbit-1236508954/
-
CBS Decides That NOT Airing Associates Of Sex-Trafficking Pedophiles Would Be Woke
-
CBS Decides That NOT Airing Associates Of Sex-Trafficking Pedophiles Would Be Woke
-
CBS Decides That NOT Airing Associates Of Sex-Trafficking Pedophiles Would Be Woke
-
CBS Decides That NOT Airing Associates Of Sex-Trafficking Pedophiles Would Be Woke
-
CBS Decides That NOT Airing Associates Of Sex-Trafficking Pedophiles Would Be Woke
-
So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."
First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?
Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.
https://newrepublic.com/post/206435/raskin-trump-unredacted-epstein-files
Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times
"Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.
“The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.
“To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.
“If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."
Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.
Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.
"The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."
Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.
#Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin
-
So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."
First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?
Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.
https://newrepublic.com/post/206435/raskin-trump-unredacted-epstein-files
Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times
"Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.
“The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.
“To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.
“If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."
Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.
Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.
"The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."
Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.
#Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin
-
So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."
First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?
Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.
https://newrepublic.com/post/206435/raskin-trump-unredacted-epstein-files
Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times
"Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.
“The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.
“To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.
“If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."
Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.
Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.
"The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."
Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.
#Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin
-
So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."
First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?
Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.
https://newrepublic.com/post/206435/raskin-trump-unredacted-epstein-files
Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times
"Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.
“The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.
“To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.
“If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."
Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.
Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.
"The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."
Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.
#Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin
-
CW: Lewd, Epstein related
“In 2016, #PeterAttia wrote an email to #Epstein [stating] ‘P*y is indeed low carb, still awaiting results on gluten content, though’. The subject of that email reads ‘Confirmed’”
Excuse me what?
-
CW: Lewd, Epstein related
“In 2016, #PeterAttia wrote an email to #Epstein [stating] ‘P*y is indeed low carb, still awaiting results on gluten content, though’. The subject of that email reads ‘Confirmed’”
Excuse me what?
-
CW: Lewd, Epstein related
“In 2016, #PeterAttia wrote an email to #Epstein [stating] ‘P*y is indeed low carb, still awaiting results on gluten content, though’. The subject of that email reads ‘Confirmed’”
Excuse me what?
-
Factbox: Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to politicians, business titans and other figures
-
Factbox: Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to politicians, business titans and other figures
-
Factbox: Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to politicians, business titans and other figures
-
#CBSNews Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Segment With #PeterAttia From Rerun After #EpsteinFiles Revelation
-
#CBSNews Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Segment With #PeterAttia From Rerun After #EpsteinFiles Revelation
-
#CBSNews Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Segment With #PeterAttia From Rerun After #EpsteinFiles Revelation
-
#CBSNews Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Segment With #PeterAttia From Rerun After #EpsteinFiles Revelation
-
#CBSNews Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Segment With #PeterAttia From Rerun After #EpsteinFiles Revelation
-
#bariweiss was apparently over-ruled but it looks like she is only one degree of separation from the notorious POS #Epstein #health influencer #peterattia is shown the door despite weiss's alleged reluctance. Attia apparently failed to go to the side of his troubled child, prefering to hang out with #JeffreyEpstein. Inexcusable. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/bari-versus-everyone-now-cbs-025803575.html -
#bariweiss was apparently over-ruled but it looks like she is only one degree of separation from the notorious POS #Epstein #health influencer #peterattia is shown the door despite weiss's alleged reluctance. Attia apparently failed to go to the side of his troubled child, prefering to hang out with #JeffreyEpstein. Inexcusable. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/bari-versus-everyone-now-cbs-025803575.html -
#bariweiss was apparently over-ruled but it looks like she is only one degree of separation from the notorious POS #Epstein #health influencer #peterattia is shown the door despite weiss's alleged reluctance. Attia apparently failed to go to the side of his troubled child, prefering to hang out with #JeffreyEpstein. Inexcusable. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/bari-versus-everyone-now-cbs-025803575.html -
#bariweiss was apparently over-ruled but it looks like she is only one degree of separation from the notorious POS #Epstein #health influencer #peterattia is shown the door despite weiss's alleged reluctance. Attia apparently failed to go to the side of his troubled child, prefering to hang out with #JeffreyEpstein. Inexcusable. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/bari-versus-everyone-now-cbs-025803575.html -
#bariweiss was apparently over-ruled but it looks like she is only one degree of separation from the notorious POS #Epstein #health influencer #peterattia is shown the door despite weiss's alleged reluctance. Attia apparently failed to go to the side of his troubled child, prefering to hang out with #JeffreyEpstein. Inexcusable. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/bari-versus-everyone-now-cbs-025803575.html -
"These men – Trump and Attia and others in the Epstein network of partying and playing and getting 'massages' -- can slough off criticism of their behavior in years past because today, the Trump Department of Justice has said officially that they did nothing wrong."
#Epstein #Trump #ToddBlanche #BariWeiss #PeterAttia #DOJ #pedophiles #EconomicElites #coverup #CBS
/20 -
"These men – Trump and Attia and others in the Epstein network of partying and playing and getting 'massages' -- can slough off criticism of their behavior in years past because today, the Trump Department of Justice has said officially that they did nothing wrong."
#Epstein #Trump #ToddBlanche #BariWeiss #PeterAttia #DOJ #pedophiles #EconomicElites #coverup #CBS
/20