#openx — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #openx, aggregated by home.social.
-
DrumWave: Uma agenda ainda obscura
Startup que tem o Brasil como laboratório de monetização de dados propõe recompensar cidadãos por informações privadas. Mas onde ficará o real lucro? Que relações tem com o rentismo? Usando infraestrutura pública, como fica a soberania?https://outraspalavras.net/tecnologiaemdisputa/drumwave-uma-agenda-obscura/
-
OpenX names Matt Sattel CEO after John Gentry's death from cancer: OpenX Technologies appointed Matt Sattel as CEO on February 5, 2026, following founder John Gentry's death last month after 12-year tenure building independent SSP. https://ppc.land/openx-names-matt-sattel-ceo-after-john-gentrys-death-from-cancer/ #OpenX #MattSattel #JohnGentry #CEO #Leadership
-
OpenX names Matt Sattel CEO after John Gentry's death from cancer: OpenX Technologies appointed Matt Sattel as CEO on February 5, 2026, following founder John Gentry's death last month after 12-year tenure building independent SSP. https://ppc.land/openx-names-matt-sattel-ceo-after-john-gentrys-death-from-cancer/ #OpenX #MattSattel #JohnGentry #CEO #Leadership
-
OpenX names Matt Sattel CEO after John Gentry's death from cancer: OpenX Technologies appointed Matt Sattel as CEO on February 5, 2026, following founder John Gentry's death last month after 12-year tenure building independent SSP. https://ppc.land/openx-names-matt-sattel-ceo-after-john-gentrys-death-from-cancer/ #OpenX #MattSattel #JohnGentry #CEO #Leadership
-
OpenX names Matt Sattel CEO after John Gentry's death from cancer: OpenX Technologies appointed Matt Sattel as CEO on February 5, 2026, following founder John Gentry's death last month after 12-year tenure building independent SSP. https://ppc.land/openx-names-matt-sattel-ceo-after-john-gentrys-death-from-cancer/ #OpenX #MattSattel #JohnGentry #CEO #Leadership
-
OpenX integrates Amazon's machine learning to filter low-value impressions: OpenX enhanced its traffic optimization using Amazon Ads' Dynamic Traffic Engine to route higher-quality impressions to Amazon DSP through automated signals. https://ppc.land/openx-integrates-amazons-machine-learning-to-filter-low-value-impressions/ #OpenX #AmazonAds #MachineLearning #TrafficOptimization #DigitalMarketing
-
OpenX integrates Amazon's machine learning to filter low-value impressions: OpenX enhanced its traffic optimization using Amazon Ads' Dynamic Traffic Engine to route higher-quality impressions to Amazon DSP through automated signals. https://ppc.land/openx-integrates-amazons-machine-learning-to-filter-low-value-impressions/ #OpenX #AmazonAds #MachineLearning #TrafficOptimization #DigitalMarketing
-
This is SUPER cool <3 And everyone can contribute by adding to it!
-
This is SUPER cool <3 And everyone can contribute by adding to it!
-
This is SUPER cool <3 And everyone can contribute by adding to it!
-
This is SUPER cool <3 And everyone can contribute by adding to it!
-
This is SUPER cool <3 And everyone can contribute by adding to it!
-
This recent piece from @kaythaney strikes all the right ideas in framing today’s challenges faced by #openaccess / #openscience. And it’s in line with the #ParadoxofOpen framing that I’ve been working on.
Kaitlin argues that Open Access has become big business, and that revenues flow more quickly for the companies than the benefits for the communities producing knowledge. That’s the gist of the Paradox of Open: the commons are being exploited.
I like the point that thanks to OA, and through the exploitative modes of publishers, “OA is free to read but not free or affordable to publish”.
And Kaitlin argues that publishers would ideally dedicate a portion of profits back into the communities (the commons). +1 to that. That’s the reason that I really like the Wikimedia Enterprise project, which shows that payments back to the commons can be part of an open framework.
The problem wiki Wikimedia ENterprise is that it is voluntary - so the big question is, how can such redistribution be mandated?
A starting point would be for #openX communities (not just #OA / #openscience but also #opensource, for example, have a shared position on the need for such redistribution.
-
This recent piece from @kaythaney strikes all the right ideas in framing today’s challenges faced by #openaccess / #openscience. And it’s in line with the #ParadoxofOpen framing that I’ve been working on.
Kaitlin argues that Open Access has become big business, and that revenues flow more quickly for the companies than the benefits for the communities producing knowledge. That’s the gist of the Paradox of Open: the commons are being exploited.
I like the point that thanks to OA, and through the exploitative modes of publishers, “OA is free to read but not free or affordable to publish”.
And Kaitlin argues that publishers would ideally dedicate a portion of profits back into the communities (the commons). +1 to that. That’s the reason that I really like the Wikimedia Enterprise project, which shows that payments back to the commons can be part of an open framework.
The problem wiki Wikimedia ENterprise is that it is voluntary - so the big question is, how can such redistribution be mandated?
A starting point would be for #openX communities (not just #OA / #openscience but also #opensource, for example, have a shared position on the need for such redistribution.