home.social

#officeofmanagementandbudget — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #officeofmanagementandbudget, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Kermit Gordon (July 3, 1916 – June 21, 1976) was Director of the United States Bureau of the Budget (now the #OfficeOfManagementAndBudget) (December 28, 1962 – June 1, 1965) during the administration of #JohnFKennedy. He continued to serve in this capacity in the #LyndonJohnson administration. He oversaw the creation of the first budgets for Johnson's #GreatSociety domestic agenda. Gordon was a member of the #CouncilOfEconomicAdvisors, 1961–1962. After he retired from government service.

  2. The White House just changed the quantum game. Here’s what it means for national security.

    President Donald Trump recently signed two executive orders that together represent the most consequential federal action on quantum…
    #UnitedStates #US #USA #cameronchehreh #Cryptography #IONQ #nationalcyberdirector #nationalquantuminitiative #OfficeofManagementandBudget #post-quantumcryptography #theWhiteHouse #TrumpAdministration
    europesays.com/3246114/

  3. Trump's Director of the #OfficeofManagementandBudget and longtime ally, #RusselVought, gets BUSTED as public comments begin MYSTERIOUSLY disappearing from a federal website for calling out his #hypocrisy on a CRITICAL DRUG. #JohnIadarola and Sen. #NinaTurner break it down
    youtu.be/YGUXARBznrE?...

    Trump Team PANICS Over Website...

  4. Federal judge bars Trump administration from using obscure clause to make huge funding cuts

    By MICHAEL CASEY BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge in Boston on Friday ruled the Trump administration can’t…
    #UnitedStates #US #USA #OfficeofManagementandBudget #terminationclause #trump
    europesays.com/3137398/

  5. “When you mix science and politics, you get politics:*…

    Agronomist and political operator Trofim Lysenko (left, giving a speech at the Kremlin in 1935) and U.S.S.R. dictator Joseph Stalin (right) purged geneticists who did not renounce Mendelian genetics. A new funding framework proposed in the United States could similarly quell certain areas of scientific inquiry, many scientists and activists say.

    Tina Hesman Saey on a looming threat to the U.S…

    Soviet scientists in the 1930s knew what could happen if they bucked the party line: denunciation, firing and banishment from the scientific establishment, even imprisonment and death. Political reprisals against those who opposed the views of dictator Joseph Stalin and his followers — and the dubious science they endorsed — led to the starvation of millions, as well as to decades of lost progress in fields from agriculture to molecular biology.

    Now, scientists are warning that history could repeat itself — but in the United States.

    A new proposal from the U.S. Office of Management and Budget would put political appointees in charge of funding decisions traditionally overseen by scientists. In recent years, the federal government has funded about 40 percent of basic science research in the United States.

    The OMB’s more than 400-page proposed rule change would let political appointees decide how to hand out federal research funds and who can get them. It would cut funding for collaboration with scientists in other countries and restrict scientists’ ability to communicate their findings. What’s more, it could prevent research on matters that President Donald Trump’s administration has deemed “not in the national interest” — such as studies on health disparities, mRNA-based vaccines and research that doesn’t recognize biological sex as a strict binary.

    The new rules would also give OMB the power to rescind previously approved research funds. The proposal “poses a sweeping threat to federal grantmaking and the responsible stewardship of American taxpayer dollars,” the science advocacy group Stand Up for Science Foundation said in a report. In addition, it would impact nonscientific grants supporting services for mental health, housing, education, veterans and Tribal nations, affecting the health and well-being of millions.

    So far, OMB has received more than 98,000 comments on the proposal. The public comment period closes July 13. It then will be up to OMB to decide whether to keep the rule as is, revise it or scrap it.

    These far-reaching measures are already drawing parallels to dark moments in scientific history. Some researchers say the recent mass firings, policy changes and grant cancellations at federal research institutions, including the U.S. National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, closely mirror what happened in the U.S.S.R. under Stalin. “A similar threat now hangs over U.S. science,” the editorial board of The New England Journal of Medicine wrote in June.

    Its editorial invoked the example of Trofim Lysenko [see here], an agronomist and astute political operator who rose to power in the 1930s Soviet Union under Stalin.

    Until the 1930s, “the Soviet Union was a real powerhouse in the field of genetics,” says Lee Dugatkin, an evolutionary biologist and historian of science at the University of Louisville in Kentucky.

    Then, Lysenko came along. “This guy was your sort of classic charlatan,” Dugatkin says. “He had the equivalent of a mail order degree in agriculture, but he was quite good with the press, and he started to basically spread this idea out there that he was capable of dramatically increasing crop yield, particularly wheat.”

    Lysenko’s supposed innovation was a process called vernalization and amounted to soaking seeds in freezing water. The resulting plants — and all their offspring — should be resistant to the U.S.S.R.’s famously cold winters, Lysenko reasoned.

    His reasoning was based on a disproven idea in evolutionary biology called Lamarckian inheritance. French biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and his followers thought that things an organism experiences in its lifetime can be handed down to the next generation. The classic example is a giraffe that has to stretch to reach leaves producing offspring with long necks.

    This idea ran counter to Mendelian genetics, which holds that genes — not environmental influences — control traits and are passed to offspring. Mendelian geneticists thought it would take five years to breed more cold-tolerant crops. Lysenko said he could do it in two to three years.

    Stalin didn’t have time to wait. He was trying to get collective farms going and needed to increase crop yields to feed more than 150 million people. Large parts of the country had already suffered from famine in 1932 and 1933 and about 6 million people died. Some resorted to cannibalism.

    Stalin embraced Lysenko’s quick-fix approach. That decision, says Michael Gordin, a historian of science at Princeton University, was “something that the majority of people at the time, and everyone since, considers the wrong side of the dispute.”

    Lysenko was put in charge of a prestigious genetics institute and forced his scientifically unsound farming practices on the collective farms. His methods were disastrous.

    Soaking seeds in freezing water hampered germination, leading to crop losses. Millions starved. Meanwhile, Mendelian genetics was branded a “whore of capitalism,” and geneticists were forced to renounce their views or lose their jobs. Many were jailed, and almost a dozen were executed or died in prison.

    The Soviet Union lost its scientific leadership role and sat on the sidelines for important scientific discoveries of the 1950s and beyond. One, Gordin says, was the development of “massively” productive hybrid corn. The country also missed out on the discovery of DNA and the advent of molecular biology, putting Soviet genetics decades behind the rest of the world.

    Soviet genetics did not recover from Lysenko’s influence until after the break-up of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Gordin says. “I think you’d be hard pressed to find anybody who thinks that … Russia is today, or Ukraine, or any post-Soviet successor state, is a leading molecular biology country.”…

    The Soviets did it, and it didn’t end well: “Here’s what happens when you put politicians in charge of science,” from @thsaey.bsky.social in @sciencenews.bsky.social.

    See also: Idiocracy

    * John M. Barry

    ###

    As we remember the past so as not to repeat it, we might recall that it was on this date in 1834 that the Spanish Inquisition (finally) ended. Authorized by Pope Sixtus IV in 1478, the Inqusition was initially led by inquisitors (Miguel de Morillo and Juan de San Martín) who were appointed by the future Catholic monarchs, King Ferdinand II of Aragon and Queen Isabella I of Castile. It was originally (ostensibly) intended primarily to identify heretics; its aim, to maintain Christian orthodoxy. But it became an effective instrument of state power by replacing the Medieval Inquisition, which was under Papal control.

    Over its course, the Inquisition prosecuted an estimated 150,000 people for various offences. An estimated 3,000–5,000 were turned over to the state for execution, particularly in the initial 50 years, mostly by burning at the stake. Other punishments included penance and public flogging, exile, enslavement on galleys, and prison terms ranging from several years to life. In many of these punishments an important motive was the confiscation of all the victims’ property.

    As Monty Python observed, “nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.” And nobody expected it to last 356 years.

    Burning of heretics at stakes (auto-da-fé) in a marketplace during the Spanish Inquisition. (source) #agriculture #culture #funding #genetics #history #Lysenko #OfficeOfManagementAndBudget #OMB #politics #research #Science #scientificResearch #SpanishInquisition #Stalin
  6. The New Trump OMB Rule: How People, Organizations Are Pushing Back

    Director Russell Vought and his Office of Management and Budget are the architects of a new OMB rule…
    #UnitedStates #US #USA #DonaldTrump #NIH #NSF #OfficeofManagementandBudget #OMB #OMBRule #russellvought #theWhiteHouse #trump #TrumpAdministration #whitehouse
    europesays.com/3110014/

  7. Vought Weighs Rebuilding CISA Amid Budget Cuts

    The Trump administration's budget office is leaving the door open to bolstering the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, but only if Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin makes a strong case for more staff. OMB Director Russell Vought signaled a willingness to revisit staffing levels, but at a pace…

    osintsights.com/vought-weighs-

    #UsGovernment #BudgetCuts #Cisa #OfficeOfManagementAndBudget #DepartmentOfHomelandSecurity

  8. US Government Exposes 3,611 AI Use Cases Amid Transparency Concerns

    The US government has just shed light on 3,611 AI projects in a surprise move, revealing a 70% surge in active or planned initiatives compared to the previous administration. But with sparse details, many questions remain unanswered about the goals, risks, and safeguards behind these ambitious AI…

    osintsights.com/us-government-

    #ArtificialIntelligence #GovernmentTransparency #AiUseCases #OfficeOfManagementAndBudget #FederalAgencies

  9. Vought Targets Shipbuilders with OMB Rebuke at Sea Air Space

    In a stunning move, Office of Management and Budget chief Russel Vought took aim at the shipbuilding industry during the Navy League's Sea Air Space conference, delivering a sharp rebuke that made headlines. His bold intervention marked a dramatic close to the annual gathering.

    osintsights.com/vought-targets

    #ShipbuildingIndustry #OfficeOfManagementAndBudget #Omb #SeaAirSpace #DefenseIndustry

  10. White House Orders Federal Funding Probe Focused Almost Entirely on Dem States

    “I have zero doubt that they intend to withhold funds” for political reasons, one Democratic lawmaker said.

    murica.website/2026/01/white-h

  11. #Trump administration is sparing #DOGE and much of the #OfficeofManagementandBudget #OMB amid a #governmentshutdown that has #furloughed tens of thousands of government workers across the country. A third of #WhiteHouse #staff will be sent home during the shutdown, according to a contingency plan posted online Thursday. politico.com/news/2025/10/02/w #government #politics #maga #project2025 #constitution #democracy #economy #workforce

  12. 5 Calls – Oppose Project 2025 Author Russell Vought for OMB Director

    Trump has nominated Project 2025 author Russell Vought to be Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The OMB is the federal agency tasked with oversight and administration of the federal budget as approved by Congress; it came into the spotlight on January 28th when acting OMB Director Matthew Veath unlawfully froze all federal funding, creating confusion and chaos across the country.
    Voice, Y. (2025). Oppose Project 2025 Author Russell Vought for OMB Director ⭑ 5 Calls. 5 Calls. https://5calls.org/issue/russell-vought-omb-federal-freeze/

    I attempted to call Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno‘s DC office, but the call failed to go through twice. I was able to call Senator Moreno’s Ohio office, but the voice mailbox was full, so I was unable to leave a message.

    I attempted to call Ohio Senator Jon Husted‘s DC office, but the call rolled to voice mail. I was unable to leave a message as the mailbox is full. Senator Husted does not have an Ohio office listed on his webpage.

    #5Calls #BernieMoreno #JonHusted #OfficeOfManagementAndBudget #Ohio #OMB #Politics #Project2025 #RussellVought

  13. The biggest step the Biden administration took on climate yesterday wasn’t rejoining the Paris Agreement - While the Biden Administration is being celebrated for its decision to rejoin the Paris Agreement in... - feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcr #officeofmanagementandbudget #greenhousegasemissions #bidenadministration #trumpadministration #sinaitechnologies #u.s.government #greenhousegas #unitedstates #carbonchain #whitehouse #executive #persefoni #president #oil

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.