#notsafeoreffective — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #notsafeoreffective, aggregated by home.social.
-
@WhiteCatTamer @adhdeanasl Do tell, what is a sea lion and why is it important to always attack the messenger.
Also curious as to what your read line is to start doubting the "safe and effective" propaganda slogan. Admitted to be neither safe (see Telegraph article) or effective by manufacturers, public health bodies and even the mainstream media now in the nauseating "trickle truthing" style abusive partners use to 'fess up to the absolute minimum of blatant fault in the hopes of maintaining control of their victims for just a little longer.
Yeah, I will promote RFK Jr. as he at least speaks to facts and reality.
Have you noticed that the two party system will field the worst they can to force enough swing votes for the abysmal opponent the globalists want to put into office. They then alternate the choices as required to make sure the laws desired are passed apparently as a will of the people yet just one election cycle ago the majority did not want the law that curbs freedoms but when given the correct mainstream media spin it is put in place.
The time from conspiracy theory to fact is shrinking so one has to be very sceptical to be ahead of the curve, Two links below, one is behind a pay wall but you can find many people reporting on it. The other link may be hard to process if you think there is nothing wrong, but as an exercise try to find something that is totally wrong and then you can mock me. I'm open to mockery if I am wrong even though it is a bit of a cheap blow from a insecure debater but my hope is that you will notice more wrong with your premises and world view that you will find fault with reality and slowly getup to speed and join the winning team.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/orientation-for-new-readers
As a bonus, I found the following which is a delightful synopsis of the disaster that the health freedom advocates call the plandemic. Se if you can read at least to the point where they write "After five months, protection against reinfection for the vaccinated children was negative.". If all of it seems like lies then follow some of the scores of inline links to the published source material. Try and figure out how it would be possible to craft the summary to support your world view using the given, or in fact any, verifiable sources.
Good luck and have a lovely day.