home.social

#nolabels — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #nolabels, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Ooooo an extra No Labels treat! I love it!

    'Talk to You' Performance Video | NO LABELS: PART 01 | 연준 (YEONJUN)
    youtube.com/watch?v=NIGA89HGTBU

    #Yeonjun #NoLabels #KPop

  2. Ooooo an extra No Labels treat! I love it!

    'Talk to You' Performance Video | NO LABELS: PART 01 | 연준 (YEONJUN)
    youtube.com/watch?v=NIGA89HGTBU

    #Yeonjun #NoLabels #KPop

  3. Both sides agree that Kamala Harris was too WOKE & incoherent to win over Real Americans. No amount of campaigning with Republicans and for Republican policies could persuade the Civil Rights opposing “middle” to vote for a “7th string quarterback.” #centerism #Unity #NoLabels #ThirdWay

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:dwo4vgrhrri3lnrc4inkwtdh/post/3lh5cfnckqr2m

  4. Jennifer Rubin: How No Labels was thwarted — and a disaster for democracy was avoided

    Rubin: Was No Labels based on a false premise that voters needed some other choice?

    Matt Bennett: They were not just saying they would be a place to park a protest vote, the way Jill Stein does. They were saying they were “in it to win it” — that they would defy history, polling and political physics to actually win as a third party. That was preposterous, as we pointed out many times, analyzing their polling, electoral map, etc. The question of whether voters would like another choice is quite different than whether they would actually choose a third party in November.

    Even if you are disappointed or worry about his age, you simply must vote for him if you care about responsible, centrist governing. Failing to vote — or throwing away your vote on another third party (Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Stein, etc.) — would be tantamount to voting for Trump.

    #nolabels
    washingtonpost.com/opinions/20

  5. Jennifer Rubin: How No Labels was thwarted — and a disaster for democracy was avoided

    Rubin: Was No Labels based on a false premise that voters needed some other choice?

    Matt Bennett: They were not just saying they would be a place to park a protest vote, the way Jill Stein does. They were saying they were “in it to win it” — that they would defy history, polling and political physics to actually win as a third party. That was preposterous, as we pointed out many times, analyzing their polling, electoral map, etc. The question of whether voters would like another choice is quite different than whether they would actually choose a third party in November.

    Even if you are disappointed or worry about his age, you simply must vote for him if you care about responsible, centrist governing. Failing to vote — or throwing away your vote on another third party (Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Stein, etc.) — would be tantamount to voting for Trump.

    #nolabels
    washingtonpost.com/opinions/20

  6. “After months of attempting to recruit a third-party candidate for 2024 — and months of Democrats’ denunciations — the group No Labels announced it would have no ticket for this year’s presidential race.”

    “Without a No Labels ticket, Biden and democracy stand a better chance of prevailing in November. That is no small thing.”

    #Election2024 #NoLabels #GiftArticle
    wapo.st/3POLnPO

  7. “After months of attempting to recruit a third-party candidate for 2024 — and months of Democrats’ denunciations — the group No Labels announced it would have no ticket for this year’s presidential race.”

    “Without a No Labels ticket, Biden and democracy stand a better chance of prevailing in November. That is no small thing.”

    #Election2024 #NoLabels #GiftArticle
    wapo.st/3POLnPO

  8. #NoLabels #RidinWithBiden

    No Labels national director Joe Cunningham told Fox News that would vote for President Biden now that his group has said it will not launch a third-party candidate into the fray of the 2024 presidential election.

  9. #NoLabels #RidinWithBiden

    No Labels national director Joe Cunningham told Fox News that would vote for President Biden now that his group has said it will not launch a third-party candidate into the fray of the 2024 presidential election.

  10. It's official: No Labels won't be running a candidate for president in 2024

    If only they would have spent those millions of dollars in a better way to benefit society instead of wasting it like this.

    #USPol #Politics #NoLabels

  11. It's official: No Labels won't be running a candidate for president in 2024

    If only they would have spent those millions of dollars in a better way to benefit society instead of wasting it like this.

    #USPol #Politics #NoLabels

  12. #TheLincolnProject

    #NoLabels ended their false campaign today. There were always dark forces hovering around this election using deceptive and misleading strategies to end our democracy and prop up Donald. We knew it all along and we never let up and now… another one bites the dust. If you support the work we've been doing, please consider donating: action.lincolnproject.us/donat

  13. Today No Labels is ending our effort to put forth a Unity ticket in the 2024 presidential election. Imagine, they were unable to recruit a viable candidate. This is a big deal.

    #NoLabels #election2024
    nolabels.org/no-labels-2024-ba

  14. Today No Labels is ending our effort to put forth a Unity ticket in the 2024 presidential election. Imagine, they were unable to recruit a viable candidate. This is a big deal.

    #NoLabels #election2024
    nolabels.org/no-labels-2024-ba

  15. Every god damn journalist who took these grifting turds seriously needs to step up and eat some crow.

    #NoLabels has ended its 2024 presidential bid | AP News
    apnews.com/article/no-labels-2

  16. #NoLabels #2024PresidentialElection
    No Labels ends 2024 presidential efforts

    "The group's co-founder said that it was not able to identify "candidates with a credible path to winning the White House" on a third-party ticket."
    nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elec

  17. There are certain people of whom it's appropriate to say, "it's good they're dead."

    That's not unkind. "Unkind" is singlehandedly killing Americans' option to buy into public healthcare (the "public option" that Joe Lieberman blocked to please his insurance-company donors). "Unkind" is persuading the only truly environmentalist candidate in eighty years to concede the stolen 2000 election to an oil scion. "Unkind" is backing a #NoLabels front group to help fascists win elections.

    "Kind" is being glad that such an unkind schmuck is dead.

  18. There are certain people of whom it's appropriate to say, "it's good they're dead."

    That's not unkind. "Unkind" is singlehandedly killing Americans' option to buy into public healthcare (the "public option" that Joe Lieberman blocked to please his insurance-company donors). "Unkind" is persuading the only truly environmentalist candidate in eighty years to concede the stolen 2000 election to an oil scion. "Unkind" is backing a #NoLabels front group to help fascists win elections.

    "Kind" is being glad that such an unkind schmuck is dead.

  19. Never would have bet that Dick Cheney would outlive Joe Lieberman. #Lieberman #NoLabels

  20. Never would have bet that Dick Cheney would outlive Joe Lieberman. #Lieberman #NoLabels

  21. @GottaLaff Good. Rest in pain, MFer. I hope his #NoLabels fascist-enablement project dies with him.

    (If you don't want people to speak ill of you when you die, don't behave like a judgmental, antidemocratic, festering assferret while you live.)

  22. @GottaLaff Good. Rest in pain, MFer. I hope his #NoLabels fascist-enablement project dies with him.

    (If you don't want people to speak ill of you when you die, don't behave like a judgmental, antidemocratic, festering assferret while you live.)

  23. “This election is going to be extremely close just like the last election, so every vote that does not go to Joe Biden is going to hurt Joe Biden, whether it goes to Donald Trump or to RFK. It’s all the same, and with the race this close, we can’t afford to lose any votes,” said Chuck Rocha, a senior adviser on Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-VT) 2020 presidential campaign.

    vox.com/politics/24112624/rfk-

    #politics #uspolitics #getoutthevote #NoLabels #thirdparty #Rfk_jr

  24. “This election is going to be extremely close just like the last election, so every vote that does not go to Joe Biden is going to hurt Joe Biden, whether it goes to Donald Trump or to RFK. It’s all the same, and with the race this close, we can’t afford to lose any votes,” said Chuck Rocha, a senior adviser on Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-VT) 2020 presidential campaign.

    vox.com/politics/24112624/rfk-

    #politics #uspolitics #getoutthevote #NoLabels #thirdparty #Rfk_jr

  25. "No Labels does not have the path or math to win the presidency, and their campaign would only help Donald Trump get reelected in 2024. Their own data suggests they would spoil the election for Democrats and put Trump back in the White House."

    #NoLabels #election2024 #VoteBlue
    campaigns.moveon.org/expose-no

  26. #JimmyKimmel asks “How many losing teams can (#AaronRodgers ) be a part of at once?” 😂 huffpost.com/entry/jimmy-kimme

    #NYJets #RFKjr #NoLabels #Independent

    P.S. In case you missed the *BREAKING!* #DynastyNews , the K in #RFKjr still stands for Kennedy, but the RF now stands for Rat Fucker! #USpol