#navalravikant — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #navalravikant, aggregated by home.social.
-
Book Review: The Almanack of Naval Ravikant by Eric Jorgenson
Naval Ravikant is the rare startup philosopher people quote without having read: a few viral tweets about wealth and happiness, half-remembered. Eric Jorgenson fixed that by collecting Naval’s best thinking into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant, a book that’s free online and worth every minute.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
Brief Book Summary
What the book is
It’s not a memoir or a manifesto. It’s a curated collection of Naval’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts, organized by Jorgenson into two parts: Wealth and Happiness. The wealth section covers leverage, specific knowledge, and building assets that earn while you sleep. The happiness section is quieter: desire as a contract to be unhappy, the skill of being present, choosing what to want carefully.
Who is Eric Jorgenson?
Eric Jorgenson is a writer and product strategist who compiled Naval Ravikant’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant. He’s not a famous investor himself; he’s a curator who recognized the value in Naval’s thinking and organized it into a coherent, free book. The Almanack is his best-known work.
What are some lessons readers can take away from the book?
The ideas that stick
Naval’s core wealth thesis: you won’t get rich renting out your time; you get rich by owning equity and using leverage (code, media, and capital). Specific knowledge (what you know that can’t be trained) is the moat. On happiness: “happiness is a choice and a skill you develop.” The book’s most useful trick is showing these aren’t separate pursuits. The same clear thinking that builds wealth also builds a good life, if you aim it right.
Specific knowledge: your career moat
Naval’s most useful career concept is specific knowledge: the stuff you know that can’t be taught in a classroom or replaced by a manual. It’s the intersection of your genuine curiosity, your unique experience, and what the market will pay for. You can’t copy someone else’s specific knowledge, which is why it’s a moat. The practical takeaway: stop chasing hot skills and double down on what fascinates you. Compounding applies to knowledge too. Ten years of genuine interest in a niche beats ten months of grinding through a bootcamp for a skill you don’t care about.
Leverage for people who aren’t founders
Naval’s leverage framework (code, media, capital) sounds founder-centric, but it maps cleanly onto personal finance. Capital leverage is the one available to everyone: every dollar you invest in a broad index fund is a tiny piece of thousands of businesses working while you sleep. That’s leverage. Media leverage is writing, teaching, or building an audience around what you know. You don’t need to start a company to use these. The frugal version is simple: earn, save the difference, invest it automatically, and let other people’s labor (via the stock market) compound for you.
The happiness section is the real differentiator
Most money books stop at wealth. The Almanack of Naval Ravikant keeps going, and the happiness section is why the book endures. Naval’s core claim, that desire is a contract to be unhappy until you get what you want, is a genuinely useful mental filter. It doesn’t mean wanting nothing. It means choosing your wants carefully instead of absorbing them from advertising and social media. Paired with the wealth advice, the message is coherent: build enough to be free, then stop optimizing for more and start optimizing for presence. That’s a healthier endpoint than most finance books offer.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
What are some criticisms of the book?
What it’s not
It’s repetitive by design. Naval returns to the same few ideas from different angles, and Jorgenson preserves that. If you want a step-by-step plan, this isn’t it. It’s a book of principles, not tactics. And Naval’s framework assumes a baseline of privilege (skills, internet, optionality) that not everyone has.
Should readers buy the book or not?
Who should read it
Anyone building something (a business, a career, a life) who wants better mental models for both money and meaning. It’s short, it’s free, and it rewards re-reading.
Where to get it
Buy The Almanack of Naval Ravikant on Amazon (or read it free at the author’s site).
Get it, because it’s free. The question isn’t whether to buy but whether to spend the time reading. Yes, if you want mental models for building wealth and designing a happier life. It’s short, dense with insight, and rewards re-reading. If you prefer physical books, the paperback is worth the $15 for a desk reference you’ll return to and you’ll be supporting Winchell House with your purchase.
Final thoughts.
The Almanack of Naval Ravikant endures because it pairs wealth-building with happiness as a skill. Most money books stop at the first; Naval insists the second matters more. For a frugal investor, the message is clarifying: build enough to be free, then optimize for presence, not more.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
#BookReviews #Books #EricJorgenson #Investing #NavalRavikant #PersonalFinance #Psychology -
Book Review: The Almanack of Naval Ravikant by Eric Jorgenson
Naval Ravikant is the rare startup philosopher people quote without having read: a few viral tweets about wealth and happiness, half-remembered. Eric Jorgenson fixed that by collecting Naval’s best thinking into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant, a book that’s free online and worth every minute.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
Brief Book Summary
What the book is
It’s not a memoir or a manifesto. It’s a curated collection of Naval’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts, organized by Jorgenson into two parts: Wealth and Happiness. The wealth section covers leverage, specific knowledge, and building assets that earn while you sleep. The happiness section is quieter: desire as a contract to be unhappy, the skill of being present, choosing what to want carefully.
Who is Eric Jorgenson?
Eric Jorgenson is a writer and product strategist who compiled Naval Ravikant’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant. He’s not a famous investor himself; he’s a curator who recognized the value in Naval’s thinking and organized it into a coherent, free book. The Almanack is his best-known work.
What are some lessons readers can take away from the book?
The ideas that stick
Naval’s core wealth thesis: you won’t get rich renting out your time; you get rich by owning equity and using leverage (code, media, and capital). Specific knowledge (what you know that can’t be trained) is the moat. On happiness: “happiness is a choice and a skill you develop.” The book’s most useful trick is showing these aren’t separate pursuits. The same clear thinking that builds wealth also builds a good life, if you aim it right.
Specific knowledge: your career moat
Naval’s most useful career concept is specific knowledge: the stuff you know that can’t be taught in a classroom or replaced by a manual. It’s the intersection of your genuine curiosity, your unique experience, and what the market will pay for. You can’t copy someone else’s specific knowledge, which is why it’s a moat. The practical takeaway: stop chasing hot skills and double down on what fascinates you. Compounding applies to knowledge too. Ten years of genuine interest in a niche beats ten months of grinding through a bootcamp for a skill you don’t care about.
Leverage for people who aren’t founders
Naval’s leverage framework (code, media, capital) sounds founder-centric, but it maps cleanly onto personal finance. Capital leverage is the one available to everyone: every dollar you invest in a broad index fund is a tiny piece of thousands of businesses working while you sleep. That’s leverage. Media leverage is writing, teaching, or building an audience around what you know. You don’t need to start a company to use these. The frugal version is simple: earn, save the difference, invest it automatically, and let other people’s labor (via the stock market) compound for you.
The happiness section is the real differentiator
Most money books stop at wealth. The Almanack of Naval Ravikant keeps going, and the happiness section is why the book endures. Naval’s core claim, that desire is a contract to be unhappy until you get what you want, is a genuinely useful mental filter. It doesn’t mean wanting nothing. It means choosing your wants carefully instead of absorbing them from advertising and social media. Paired with the wealth advice, the message is coherent: build enough to be free, then stop optimizing for more and start optimizing for presence. That’s a healthier endpoint than most finance books offer.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
What are some criticisms of the book?
What it’s not
It’s repetitive by design. Naval returns to the same few ideas from different angles, and Jorgenson preserves that. If you want a step-by-step plan, this isn’t it. It’s a book of principles, not tactics. And Naval’s framework assumes a baseline of privilege (skills, internet, optionality) that not everyone has.
Should readers buy the book or not?
Who should read it
Anyone building something (a business, a career, a life) who wants better mental models for both money and meaning. It’s short, it’s free, and it rewards re-reading.
Where to get it
Buy The Almanack of Naval Ravikant on Amazon (or read it free at the author’s site).
Get it, because it’s free. The question isn’t whether to buy but whether to spend the time reading. Yes, if you want mental models for building wealth and designing a happier life. It’s short, dense with insight, and rewards re-reading. If you prefer physical books, the paperback is worth the $15 for a desk reference you’ll return to and you’ll be supporting Winchell House with your purchase.
Final thoughts.
The Almanack of Naval Ravikant endures because it pairs wealth-building with happiness as a skill. Most money books stop at the first; Naval insists the second matters more. For a frugal investor, the message is clarifying: build enough to be free, then optimize for presence, not more.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
#BookReviews #Books #EricJorgenson #Investing #NavalRavikant #PersonalFinance #Psychology -
Book Review: The Almanack of Naval Ravikant by Eric Jorgenson
Naval Ravikant is the rare startup philosopher people quote without having read: a few viral tweets about wealth and happiness, half-remembered. Eric Jorgenson fixed that by collecting Naval’s best thinking into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant, a book that’s free online and worth every minute.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
Brief Book Summary
What the book is
It’s not a memoir or a manifesto. It’s a curated collection of Naval’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts, organized by Jorgenson into two parts: Wealth and Happiness. The wealth section covers leverage, specific knowledge, and building assets that earn while you sleep. The happiness section is quieter: desire as a contract to be unhappy, the skill of being present, choosing what to want carefully.
Who is Eric Jorgenson?
Eric Jorgenson is a writer and product strategist who compiled Naval Ravikant’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant. He’s not a famous investor himself; he’s a curator who recognized the value in Naval’s thinking and organized it into a coherent, free book. The Almanack is his best-known work.
What are some lessons readers can take away from the book?
The ideas that stick
Naval’s core wealth thesis: you won’t get rich renting out your time; you get rich by owning equity and using leverage (code, media, and capital). Specific knowledge (what you know that can’t be trained) is the moat. On happiness: “happiness is a choice and a skill you develop.” The book’s most useful trick is showing these aren’t separate pursuits. The same clear thinking that builds wealth also builds a good life, if you aim it right.
Specific knowledge: your career moat
Naval’s most useful career concept is specific knowledge: the stuff you know that can’t be taught in a classroom or replaced by a manual. It’s the intersection of your genuine curiosity, your unique experience, and what the market will pay for. You can’t copy someone else’s specific knowledge, which is why it’s a moat. The practical takeaway: stop chasing hot skills and double down on what fascinates you. Compounding applies to knowledge too. Ten years of genuine interest in a niche beats ten months of grinding through a bootcamp for a skill you don’t care about.
Leverage for people who aren’t founders
Naval’s leverage framework (code, media, capital) sounds founder-centric, but it maps cleanly onto personal finance. Capital leverage is the one available to everyone: every dollar you invest in a broad index fund is a tiny piece of thousands of businesses working while you sleep. That’s leverage. Media leverage is writing, teaching, or building an audience around what you know. You don’t need to start a company to use these. The frugal version is simple: earn, save the difference, invest it automatically, and let other people’s labor (via the stock market) compound for you.
The happiness section is the real differentiator
Most money books stop at wealth. The Almanack of Naval Ravikant keeps going, and the happiness section is why the book endures. Naval’s core claim, that desire is a contract to be unhappy until you get what you want, is a genuinely useful mental filter. It doesn’t mean wanting nothing. It means choosing your wants carefully instead of absorbing them from advertising and social media. Paired with the wealth advice, the message is coherent: build enough to be free, then stop optimizing for more and start optimizing for presence. That’s a healthier endpoint than most finance books offer.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
What are some criticisms of the book?
What it’s not
It’s repetitive by design. Naval returns to the same few ideas from different angles, and Jorgenson preserves that. If you want a step-by-step plan, this isn’t it. It’s a book of principles, not tactics. And Naval’s framework assumes a baseline of privilege (skills, internet, optionality) that not everyone has.
Should readers buy the book or not?
Who should read it
Anyone building something (a business, a career, a life) who wants better mental models for both money and meaning. It’s short, it’s free, and it rewards re-reading.
Where to get it
Buy The Almanack of Naval Ravikant on Amazon (or read it free at the author’s site).
Get it, because it’s free. The question isn’t whether to buy but whether to spend the time reading. Yes, if you want mental models for building wealth and designing a happier life. It’s short, dense with insight, and rewards re-reading. If you prefer physical books, the paperback is worth the $15 for a desk reference you’ll return to and you’ll be supporting Winchell House with your purchase.
Final thoughts.
The Almanack of Naval Ravikant endures because it pairs wealth-building with happiness as a skill. Most money books stop at the first; Naval insists the second matters more. For a frugal investor, the message is clarifying: build enough to be free, then optimize for presence, not more.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
#BookReviews #Books #EricJorgenson #Investing #NavalRavikant #PersonalFinance #Psychology -
Book Review: The Almanack of Naval Ravikant by Eric Jorgenson
Naval Ravikant is the rare startup philosopher people quote without having read: a few viral tweets about wealth and happiness, half-remembered. Eric Jorgenson fixed that by collecting Naval’s best thinking into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant, a book that’s free online and worth every minute.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
Brief Book Summary
What the book is
It’s not a memoir or a manifesto. It’s a curated collection of Naval’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts, organized by Jorgenson into two parts: Wealth and Happiness. The wealth section covers leverage, specific knowledge, and building assets that earn while you sleep. The happiness section is quieter: desire as a contract to be unhappy, the skill of being present, choosing what to want carefully.
Who is Eric Jorgenson?
Eric Jorgenson is a writer and product strategist who compiled Naval Ravikant’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant. He’s not a famous investor himself; he’s a curator who recognized the value in Naval’s thinking and organized it into a coherent, free book. The Almanack is his best-known work.
What are some lessons readers can take away from the book?
The ideas that stick
Naval’s core wealth thesis: you won’t get rich renting out your time; you get rich by owning equity and using leverage (code, media, and capital). Specific knowledge (what you know that can’t be trained) is the moat. On happiness: “happiness is a choice and a skill you develop.” The book’s most useful trick is showing these aren’t separate pursuits. The same clear thinking that builds wealth also builds a good life, if you aim it right.
Specific knowledge: your career moat
Naval’s most useful career concept is specific knowledge: the stuff you know that can’t be taught in a classroom or replaced by a manual. It’s the intersection of your genuine curiosity, your unique experience, and what the market will pay for. You can’t copy someone else’s specific knowledge, which is why it’s a moat. The practical takeaway: stop chasing hot skills and double down on what fascinates you. Compounding applies to knowledge too. Ten years of genuine interest in a niche beats ten months of grinding through a bootcamp for a skill you don’t care about.
Leverage for people who aren’t founders
Naval’s leverage framework (code, media, capital) sounds founder-centric, but it maps cleanly onto personal finance. Capital leverage is the one available to everyone: every dollar you invest in a broad index fund is a tiny piece of thousands of businesses working while you sleep. That’s leverage. Media leverage is writing, teaching, or building an audience around what you know. You don’t need to start a company to use these. The frugal version is simple: earn, save the difference, invest it automatically, and let other people’s labor (via the stock market) compound for you.
The happiness section is the real differentiator
Most money books stop at wealth. The Almanack of Naval Ravikant keeps going, and the happiness section is why the book endures. Naval’s core claim, that desire is a contract to be unhappy until you get what you want, is a genuinely useful mental filter. It doesn’t mean wanting nothing. It means choosing your wants carefully instead of absorbing them from advertising and social media. Paired with the wealth advice, the message is coherent: build enough to be free, then stop optimizing for more and start optimizing for presence. That’s a healthier endpoint than most finance books offer.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
What are some criticisms of the book?
What it’s not
It’s repetitive by design. Naval returns to the same few ideas from different angles, and Jorgenson preserves that. If you want a step-by-step plan, this isn’t it. It’s a book of principles, not tactics. And Naval’s framework assumes a baseline of privilege (skills, internet, optionality) that not everyone has.
Should readers buy the book or not?
Who should read it
Anyone building something (a business, a career, a life) who wants better mental models for both money and meaning. It’s short, it’s free, and it rewards re-reading.
Where to get it
Buy The Almanack of Naval Ravikant on Amazon (or read it free at the author’s site).
Get it, because it’s free. The question isn’t whether to buy but whether to spend the time reading. Yes, if you want mental models for building wealth and designing a happier life. It’s short, dense with insight, and rewards re-reading. If you prefer physical books, the paperback is worth the $15 for a desk reference you’ll return to and you’ll be supporting Winchell House with your purchase.
Final thoughts.
The Almanack of Naval Ravikant endures because it pairs wealth-building with happiness as a skill. Most money books stop at the first; Naval insists the second matters more. For a frugal investor, the message is clarifying: build enough to be free, then optimize for presence, not more.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
#BookReviews #Books #EricJorgenson #Investing #NavalRavikant #PersonalFinance #Psychology -
Book Review: The Almanack of Naval Ravikant by Eric Jorgenson
Naval Ravikant is the rare startup philosopher people quote without having read: a few viral tweets about wealth and happiness, half-remembered. Eric Jorgenson fixed that by collecting Naval’s best thinking into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant, a book that’s free online and worth every minute.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
Brief Book Summary
What the book is
It’s not a memoir or a manifesto. It’s a curated collection of Naval’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts, organized by Jorgenson into two parts: Wealth and Happiness. The wealth section covers leverage, specific knowledge, and building assets that earn while you sleep. The happiness section is quieter: desire as a contract to be unhappy, the skill of being present, choosing what to want carefully.
Who is Eric Jorgenson?
Eric Jorgenson is a writer and product strategist who compiled Naval Ravikant’s tweets, essays, and podcast transcripts into The Almanack of Naval Ravikant. He’s not a famous investor himself; he’s a curator who recognized the value in Naval’s thinking and organized it into a coherent, free book. The Almanack is his best-known work.
What are some lessons readers can take away from the book?
The ideas that stick
Naval’s core wealth thesis: you won’t get rich renting out your time; you get rich by owning equity and using leverage (code, media, and capital). Specific knowledge (what you know that can’t be trained) is the moat. On happiness: “happiness is a choice and a skill you develop.” The book’s most useful trick is showing these aren’t separate pursuits. The same clear thinking that builds wealth also builds a good life, if you aim it right.
Specific knowledge: your career moat
Naval’s most useful career concept is specific knowledge: the stuff you know that can’t be taught in a classroom or replaced by a manual. It’s the intersection of your genuine curiosity, your unique experience, and what the market will pay for. You can’t copy someone else’s specific knowledge, which is why it’s a moat. The practical takeaway: stop chasing hot skills and double down on what fascinates you. Compounding applies to knowledge too. Ten years of genuine interest in a niche beats ten months of grinding through a bootcamp for a skill you don’t care about.
Leverage for people who aren’t founders
Naval’s leverage framework (code, media, capital) sounds founder-centric, but it maps cleanly onto personal finance. Capital leverage is the one available to everyone: every dollar you invest in a broad index fund is a tiny piece of thousands of businesses working while you sleep. That’s leverage. Media leverage is writing, teaching, or building an audience around what you know. You don’t need to start a company to use these. The frugal version is simple: earn, save the difference, invest it automatically, and let other people’s labor (via the stock market) compound for you.
The happiness section is the real differentiator
Most money books stop at wealth. The Almanack of Naval Ravikant keeps going, and the happiness section is why the book endures. Naval’s core claim, that desire is a contract to be unhappy until you get what you want, is a genuinely useful mental filter. It doesn’t mean wanting nothing. It means choosing your wants carefully instead of absorbing them from advertising and social media. Paired with the wealth advice, the message is coherent: build enough to be free, then stop optimizing for more and start optimizing for presence. That’s a healthier endpoint than most finance books offer.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
What are some criticisms of the book?
What it’s not
It’s repetitive by design. Naval returns to the same few ideas from different angles, and Jorgenson preserves that. If you want a step-by-step plan, this isn’t it. It’s a book of principles, not tactics. And Naval’s framework assumes a baseline of privilege (skills, internet, optionality) that not everyone has.
Should readers buy the book or not?
Who should read it
Anyone building something (a business, a career, a life) who wants better mental models for both money and meaning. It’s short, it’s free, and it rewards re-reading.
Where to get it
Buy The Almanack of Naval Ravikant on Amazon (or read it free at the author’s site).
Get it, because it’s free. The question isn’t whether to buy but whether to spend the time reading. Yes, if you want mental models for building wealth and designing a happier life. It’s short, dense with insight, and rewards re-reading. If you prefer physical books, the paperback is worth the $15 for a desk reference you’ll return to and you’ll be supporting Winchell House with your purchase.
Final thoughts.
The Almanack of Naval Ravikant endures because it pairs wealth-building with happiness as a skill. Most money books stop at the first; Naval insists the second matters more. For a frugal investor, the message is clarifying: build enough to be free, then optimize for presence, not more.
Buy The Almanack of Naval on Amazon
#BookReviews #Books #EricJorgenson #Investing #NavalRavikant #PersonalFinance #Psychology -
Bjorn Lomborg, who poses as a climate scientist but who is a climate change denier, now writes in a newspaper owned by a billionaire, that climate change cannot be real because The Great Barrier Reef still isn't dead.
Lomborg's credibility has been consistently assessed as between "low" and "very low" by Climate Feedback, the fact-checking network of scientists.
And of course he was platformed by Lex Fridman (in November 2022, episode 339).
-
Bjorn Lomborg, who poses as a climate scientist but who is a climate change denier, now writes in a newspaper owned by a billionaire, that climate change cannot be real because The Great Barrier Reef still isn't dead.
Lomborg's credibility has been consistently assessed as between "low" and "very low" by Climate Feedback, the fact-checking network of scientists.
And of course he was platformed by Lex Fridman (in November 2022, episode 339).
-
Bjorn Lomborg, who poses as a climate scientist but who is a climate change denier, now writes in a newspaper owned by a billionaire, that climate change cannot be real because The Great Barrier Reef still isn't dead.
Lomborg's credibility has been consistently assessed as between "low" and "very low" by Climate Feedback, the fact-checking network of scientists.
And of course he was platformed by Lex Fridman (in November 2022, episode 339).
-
Bjorn Lomborg, who poses as a climate scientist but who is a climate change denier, now writes in a newspaper owned by a billionaire, that climate change cannot be real because The Great Barrier Reef still isn't dead.
Lomborg's credibility has been consistently assessed as between "low" and "very low" by Climate Feedback, the fact-checking network of scientists.
And of course he was platformed by Lex Fridman (in November 2022, episode 339).
-
Bjorn Lomborg, who poses as a climate scientist but who is a climate change denier, now writes in a newspaper owned by a billionaire, that climate change cannot be real because The Great Barrier Reef still isn't dead.
Lomborg's credibility has been consistently assessed as between "low" and "very low" by Climate Feedback, the fact-checking network of scientists.
And of course he was platformed by Lex Fridman (in November 2022, episode 339).
-
RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116687765595271436
Given that the Silicon Valley fascist Naval Ravikant recommended Ted Chiang as one of his favorite Sci-Fi authors, and that Chiang's short story "The Story of Your Life and Others" is one of Ravikant's favorite stories …
… and the fact that Ravikant is pushing "AI" hard …
… I wonder what Ravikant makes of the cognitive dissonance that Chiang is anti-"AI".
-
RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116687765595271436
Given that the Silicon Valley fascist Naval Ravikant recommended Ted Chiang as one of his favorite Sci-Fi authors, and that Chiang's short story "The Story of Your Life and Others" is one of Ravikant's favorite stories …
… and the fact that Ravikant is pushing "AI" hard …
… I wonder what Ravikant makes of the cognitive dissonance that Chiang is anti-"AI".
-
RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116687765595271436
Given that the Silicon Valley fascist Naval Ravikant recommended Ted Chiang as one of his favorite Sci-Fi authors, and that Chiang's short story "The Story of Your Life and Others" is one of Ravikant's favorite stories …
… and the fact that Ravikant is pushing "AI" hard …
… I wonder what Ravikant makes of the cognitive dissonance that Chiang is anti-"AI".
-
RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116687765595271436
Given that the Silicon Valley fascist Naval Ravikant recommended Ted Chiang as one of his favorite Sci-Fi authors, and that Chiang's short story "The Story of Your Life and Others" is one of Ravikant's favorite stories …
… and the fact that Ravikant is pushing "AI" hard …
… I wonder what Ravikant makes of the cognitive dissonance that Chiang is anti-"AI".
-
RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116687765595271436
Given that the Silicon Valley fascist Naval Ravikant recommended Ted Chiang as one of his favorite Sci-Fi authors, and that Chiang's short story "The Story of Your Life and Others" is one of Ravikant's favorite stories …
… and the fact that Ravikant is pushing "AI" hard …
… I wonder what Ravikant makes of the cognitive dissonance that Chiang is anti-"AI".
-
Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, is crashing the entire economy out of greed, through what some people euphemistically call "creative accounting", and what other people call fraud … thereby causing lots of misery and suffering, destroying many people's entire livelihoods.
Only a propaganda mouthpiece could say that such a criminal is "kind" or "humble", even as a child (as if Lex knew Huang when the latter was a child).
If you still listen to any of these popular podcasts (like Lex Fridman, Joe Rogan, Dwarkesh Patel, Andrew Huberman, Naval Ravikant) … for Goodness' sake, please stop.
I don't care how interesting these are, or how much you like to listen about outer space or ancient Rome … these podcasters are lying to you and you don't even care about that.
#LexFridman #JoeRogan #AndrewHuberman #NavalRavikant #techbros #techbro #JensenHuang #Nvidia
-
Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, is crashing the entire economy out of greed, through what some people euphemistically call "creative accounting", and what other people call fraud … thereby causing lots of misery and suffering, destroying many people's entire livelihoods.
Only a propaganda mouthpiece could say that such a criminal is "kind" or "humble", even as a child (as if Lex knew Huang when the latter was a child).
If you still listen to any of these popular podcasts (like Lex Fridman, Joe Rogan, Dwarkesh Patel, Andrew Huberman, Naval Ravikant) … for Goodness' sake, please stop.
I don't care how interesting these are, or how much you like to listen about outer space or ancient Rome … these podcasters are lying to you and you don't even care about that.
#LexFridman #JoeRogan #AndrewHuberman #NavalRavikant #techbros #techbro #JensenHuang #Nvidia
-
Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, is crashing the entire economy out of greed, through what some people euphemistically call "creative accounting", and what other people call fraud … thereby causing lots of misery and suffering, destroying many people's entire livelihoods.
Only a propaganda mouthpiece could say that such a criminal is "kind" or "humble", even as a child (as if Lex knew Huang when the latter was a child).
If you still listen to any of these popular podcasts (like Lex Fridman, Joe Rogan, Dwarkesh Patel, Andrew Huberman, Naval Ravikant) … for Goodness' sake, please stop.
I don't care how interesting these are, or how much you like to listen about outer space or ancient Rome … these podcasters are lying to you and you don't even care about that.
#LexFridman #JoeRogan #AndrewHuberman #NavalRavikant #techbros #techbro #JensenHuang #Nvidia
-
Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, is crashing the entire economy out of greed, through what some people euphemistically call "creative accounting", and what other people call fraud … thereby causing lots of misery and suffering, destroying many people's entire livelihoods.
Only a propaganda mouthpiece could say that such a criminal is "kind" or "humble", even as a child (as if Lex knew Huang when the latter was a child).
If you still listen to any of these popular podcasts (like Lex Fridman, Joe Rogan, Dwarkesh Patel, Andrew Huberman, Naval Ravikant) … for Goodness' sake, please stop.
I don't care how interesting these are, or how much you like to listen about outer space or ancient Rome … these podcasters are lying to you and you don't even care about that.
#LexFridman #JoeRogan #AndrewHuberman #NavalRavikant #techbros #techbro #JensenHuang #Nvidia
-
Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, is crashing the entire economy out of greed, through what some people euphemistically call "creative accounting", and what other people call fraud … thereby causing lots of misery and suffering, destroying many people's entire livelihoods.
Only a propaganda mouthpiece could say that such a criminal is "kind" or "humble", even as a child (as if Lex knew Huang when the latter was a child).
If you still listen to any of these popular podcasts (like Lex Fridman, Joe Rogan, Dwarkesh Patel, Andrew Huberman, Naval Ravikant) … for Goodness' sake, please stop.
I don't care how interesting these are, or how much you like to listen about outer space or ancient Rome … these podcasters are lying to you and you don't even care about that.
#LexFridman #JoeRogan #AndrewHuberman #NavalRavikant #techbros #techbro #JensenHuang #Nvidia
-
If you want to understand Peter Thiel, and predict his future behavior, read the 1997 book "The Sovereign Individual".
It's his guiding star. He believes so firmly in what is written in that book, he follows its suggestions to a T.
He even wrote the foreword for the 2020 reprint.
Gil Duran and Quinn Slobodian talk about it here:
https://youtu.be/U1ombPdaRd0?list=PLuiR4zXJJriWV3KKfFme0v8Y_BbaVtimm&t=2231Of course the fascist Naval Ravikant (whom many techbros consider their guru and "the smartest person in Silicon Valley") also guided his techbro followers towards internalizing that right-wing thinking.
-
If you want to understand Peter Thiel, and predict his future behavior, read the 1997 book "The Sovereign Individual".
It's his guiding star. He believes so firmly in what is written in that book, he follows its suggestions to a T.
He even wrote the foreword for the 2020 reprint.
Gil Duran and Quinn Slobodian talk about it here:
https://youtu.be/U1ombPdaRd0?list=PLuiR4zXJJriWV3KKfFme0v8Y_BbaVtimm&t=2231Of course the fascist Naval Ravikant (whom many techbros consider their guru and "the smartest person in Silicon Valley") also guided his techbro followers towards internalizing that right-wing thinking.
-
If you want to understand Peter Thiel, and predict his future behavior, read the 1997 book "The Sovereign Individual".
It's his guiding star. He believes so firmly in what is written in that book, he follows its suggestions to a T.
He even wrote the foreword for the 2020 reprint.
Gil Duran and Quinn Slobodian talk about it here:
https://youtu.be/U1ombPdaRd0?list=PLuiR4zXJJriWV3KKfFme0v8Y_BbaVtimm&t=2231Of course the fascist Naval Ravikant (whom many techbros consider their guru and "the smartest person in Silicon Valley") also guided his techbro followers towards internalizing that right-wing thinking.
-
If you want to understand Peter Thiel, and predict his future behavior, read the 1997 book "The Sovereign Individual".
It's his guiding star. He believes so firmly in what is written in that book, he follows its suggestions to a T.
He even wrote the foreword for the 2020 reprint.
Gil Duran and Quinn Slobodian talk about it here:
https://youtu.be/U1ombPdaRd0?list=PLuiR4zXJJriWV3KKfFme0v8Y_BbaVtimm&t=2231Of course the fascist Naval Ravikant (whom many techbros consider their guru and "the smartest person in Silicon Valley") also guided his techbro followers towards internalizing that right-wing thinking.
-
If you want to understand Peter Thiel, and predict his future behavior, read the 1997 book "The Sovereign Individual".
It's his guiding star. He believes so firmly in what is written in that book, he follows its suggestions to a T.
He even wrote the foreword for the 2020 reprint.
Gil Duran and Quinn Slobodian talk about it here:
https://youtu.be/U1ombPdaRd0?list=PLuiR4zXJJriWV3KKfFme0v8Y_BbaVtimm&t=2231Of course the fascist Naval Ravikant (whom many techbros consider their guru and "the smartest person in Silicon Valley") also guided his techbro followers towards internalizing that right-wing thinking.
-
I can't believe I ever listened to this guy.
Silicon Valley treats him like a guru, like a wise sage.
#NavalRavikant has always been ultra-capitalist, and he's been upfront with it, but he also gave solid advice for how to live a happy life. For example, for how to deal with envy.
He required the people who work for him, to work 80 hours a week. He was upfront with it and mentioned it in the job description. I knew I didn't want to work that much, and the people who applied knew and applied anyway, so I just shrugged off his #capitalism views and treated Naval Ravikant like a buffet: I picked his reasonable advice and rejected his unreasonable views.
Ravikant once said that no "science" that bears the word "science" in its name is actually science, in his opinion. With the sole exception of computer science maybe. He considers himself a hard-science nerd who regrets that he didn't study physics. Only physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics are real science in his view because only they are falsifiable according to Karl Popper's definition of science. Only they can provide "good explanations".
Now he's in the replies of his own tweet, writing it's "revealing that people automatically assume the comparison is negative".
As a software engineer myself—although I'm abhorred by the notion of vibe coding—I can see at least small arguments for why vibe coding appeals to some people. They cannot code, they don't want to learn it. Same maybe as I don't want to learn how to solder just for one project idea. It's not worth the effort. I'd rather pay someone else to do it for me. Except now they don't have to pay for someone's labor anymore.
I can see the appeal of vibe coding to some, although I think it's an insult to my craft.
If I want to live in a beautiful house, I don't take to vibe architecting my house (and dying in a collapse) when I think studying architecture isn't worth it if I'm only ever going to architect one single house. No, I talk with (and pay) an actual architect.
Vibe research though goes completely against Popper's idea of falsification. Instead of hitting some "regenerate" button 1000 times before I find a theory with a proof, I'm quicker if I actually understand what I'm doing instead of just "vibing".
-
I can't believe I ever listened to this guy.
Silicon Valley treats him like a guru, like a wise sage.
#NavalRavikant has always been ultra-capitalist, and he's been upfront with it, but he also gave solid advice for how to live a happy life. For example, for how to deal with envy.
He required the people who work for him, to work 80 hours a week. He was upfront with it and mentioned it in the job description. I knew I didn't want to work that much, and the people who applied knew and applied anyway, so I just shrugged off his #capitalism views and treated Naval Ravikant like a buffet: I picked his reasonable advice and rejected his unreasonable views.
Ravikant once said that no "science" that bears the word "science" in its name is actually science, in his opinion. With the sole exception of computer science maybe. He considers himself a hard-science nerd who regrets that he didn't study physics. Only physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics are real science in his view because only they are falsifiable according to Karl Popper's definition of science. Only they can provide "good explanations".
Now he's in the replies of his own tweet, writing it's "revealing that people automatically assume the comparison is negative".
As a software engineer myself—although I'm abhorred by the notion of vibe coding—I can see at least small arguments for why vibe coding appeals to some people. They cannot code, they don't want to learn it. Same maybe as I don't want to learn how to solder just for one project idea. It's not worth the effort. I'd rather pay someone else to do it for me. Except now they don't have to pay for someone's labor anymore.
I can see the appeal of vibe coding to some, although I think it's an insult to my craft.
If I want to live in a beautiful house, I don't take to vibe architecting my house (and dying in a collapse) when I think studying architecture isn't worth it if I'm only ever going to architect one single house. No, I talk with (and pay) an actual architect.
Vibe research though goes completely against Popper's idea of falsification. Instead of hitting some "regenerate" button 1000 times before I find a theory with a proof, I'm quicker if I actually understand what I'm doing instead of just "vibing".
-
I can't believe I ever listened to this guy.
Silicon Valley treats him like a guru, like a wise sage.
#NavalRavikant has always been ultra-capitalist, and he's been upfront with it, but he also gave solid advice for how to live a happy life. For example, for how to deal with envy.
He required the people who work for him, to work 80 hours a week. He was upfront with it and mentioned it in the job description. I knew I didn't want to work that much, and the people who applied knew and applied anyway, so I just shrugged off his #capitalism views and treated Naval Ravikant like a buffet: I picked his reasonable advice and rejected his unreasonable views.
Ravikant once said that no "science" that bears the word "science" in its name is actually science, in his opinion. With the sole exception of computer science maybe. He considers himself a hard-science nerd who regrets that he didn't study physics. Only physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics are real science in his view because only they are falsifiable according to Karl Popper's definition of science. Only they can provide "good explanations".
Now he's in the replies of his own tweet, writing it's "revealing that people automatically assume the comparison is negative".
As a software engineer myself—although I'm abhorred by the notion of vibe coding—I can see at least small arguments for why vibe coding appeals to some people. They cannot code, they don't want to learn it. Same maybe as I don't want to learn how to solder just for one project idea. It's not worth the effort. I'd rather pay someone else to do it for me. Except now they don't have to pay for someone's labor anymore.
I can see the appeal of vibe coding to some, although I think it's an insult to my craft.
If I want to live in a beautiful house, I don't take to vibe architecting my house (and dying in a collapse) when I think studying architecture isn't worth it if I'm only ever going to architect one single house. No, I talk with (and pay) an actual architect.
Vibe research though goes completely against Popper's idea of falsification. Instead of hitting some "regenerate" button 1000 times before I find a theory with a proof, I'm quicker if I actually understand what I'm doing instead of just "vibing".
-
I can't believe I ever listened to this guy.
Silicon Valley treats him like a guru, like a wise sage.
#NavalRavikant has always been ultra-capitalist, and he's been upfront with it, but he also gave solid advice for how to live a happy life. For example, for how to deal with envy.
He required the people who work for him, to work 80 hours a week. He was upfront with it and mentioned it in the job description. I knew I didn't want to work that much, and the people who applied knew and applied anyway, so I just shrugged off his #capitalism views and treated Naval Ravikant like a buffet: I picked his reasonable advice and rejected his unreasonable views.
Ravikant once said that no "science" that bears the word "science" in its name is actually science, in his opinion. With the sole exception of computer science maybe. He considers himself a hard-science nerd who regrets that he didn't study physics. Only physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics are real science in his view because only they are falsifiable according to Karl Popper's definition of science. Only they can provide "good explanations".
Now he's in the replies of his own tweet, writing it's "revealing that people automatically assume the comparison is negative".
As a software engineer myself—although I'm abhorred by the notion of vibe coding—I can see at least small arguments for why vibe coding appeals to some people. They cannot code, they don't want to learn it. Same maybe as I don't want to learn how to solder just for one project idea. It's not worth the effort. I'd rather pay someone else to do it for me. Except now they don't have to pay for someone's labor anymore.
I can see the appeal of vibe coding to some, although I think it's an insult to my craft.
If I want to live in a beautiful house, I don't take to vibe architecting my house (and dying in a collapse) when I think studying architecture isn't worth it if I'm only ever going to architect one single house. No, I talk with (and pay) an actual architect.
Vibe research though goes completely against Popper's idea of falsification. Instead of hitting some "regenerate" button 1000 times before I find a theory with a proof, I'm quicker if I actually understand what I'm doing instead of just "vibing".
-
I can't believe I ever listened to this guy.
Silicon Valley treats him like a guru, like a wise sage.
#NavalRavikant has always been ultra-capitalist, and he's been upfront with it, but he also gave solid advice for how to live a happy life. For example, for how to deal with envy.
He required the people who work for him, to work 80 hours a week. He was upfront with it and mentioned it in the job description. I knew I didn't want to work that much, and the people who applied knew and applied anyway, so I just shrugged off his #capitalism views and treated Naval Ravikant like a buffet: I picked his reasonable advice and rejected his unreasonable views.
Ravikant once said that no "science" that bears the word "science" in its name is actually science, in his opinion. With the sole exception of computer science maybe. He considers himself a hard-science nerd who regrets that he didn't study physics. Only physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics are real science in his view because only they are falsifiable according to Karl Popper's definition of science. Only they can provide "good explanations".
Now he's in the replies of his own tweet, writing it's "revealing that people automatically assume the comparison is negative".
As a software engineer myself—although I'm abhorred by the notion of vibe coding—I can see at least small arguments for why vibe coding appeals to some people. They cannot code, they don't want to learn it. Same maybe as I don't want to learn how to solder just for one project idea. It's not worth the effort. I'd rather pay someone else to do it for me. Except now they don't have to pay for someone's labor anymore.
I can see the appeal of vibe coding to some, although I think it's an insult to my craft.
If I want to live in a beautiful house, I don't take to vibe architecting my house (and dying in a collapse) when I think studying architecture isn't worth it if I'm only ever going to architect one single house. No, I talk with (and pay) an actual architect.
Vibe research though goes completely against Popper's idea of falsification. Instead of hitting some "regenerate" button 1000 times before I find a theory with a proof, I'm quicker if I actually understand what I'm doing instead of just "vibing".
-
If you still listen to the podcast of any of Elon Musk's friends, then you are no friend of mine.
That includes the podcasts of:
- #LexFridman
- #JoeRogan
- #ShaneParrish
- #NavalRavikantElon Musk is a disgusting murderer and nazi and abuser who is fine with pedophelia and enables child pornography.
All mentioned people are friends with him or support him. Some do it more openly, others mix interviews with scientists and apparent experts on interesting topics into their podcast and try to balance out their support of right-wing extremism. It makes no difference.
If you still listen to anyone's of these people's podcasts, I want nothing to do with you. You are listening to your own enemy and don't even realize it.
-
If you still listen to the podcast of any of Elon Musk's friends, then you are no friend of mine.
That includes the podcasts of:
- #LexFridman
- #JoeRogan
- #ShaneParrish
- #NavalRavikantElon Musk is a disgusting murderer and nazi and abuser who is fine with pedophelia and enables child pornography.
All mentioned people are friends with him or support him. Some do it more openly, others mix interviews with scientists and apparent experts on interesting topics into their podcast and try to balance out their support of right-wing extremism. It makes no difference.
If you still listen to anyone's of these people's podcasts, I want nothing to do with you. You are listening to your own enemy and don't even realize it.
-
If you still listen to the podcast of any of Elon Musk's friends, then you are no friend of mine.
That includes the podcasts of:
- #LexFridman
- #JoeRogan
- #ShaneParrish
- #NavalRavikantElon Musk is a disgusting murderer and nazi and abuser who is fine with pedophelia and enables child pornography.
All mentioned people are friends with him or support him. Some do it more openly, others mix interviews with scientists and apparent experts on interesting topics into their podcast and try to balance out their support of right-wing extremism. It makes no difference.
If you still listen to anyone's of these people's podcasts, I want nothing to do with you. You are listening to your own enemy and don't even realize it.
-
If you still listen to the podcast of any of Elon Musk's friends, then you are no friend of mine.
That includes the podcasts of:
- #LexFridman
- #JoeRogan
- #ShaneParrish
- #NavalRavikantElon Musk is a disgusting murderer and nazi and abuser who is fine with pedophelia and enables child pornography.
All mentioned people are friends with him or support him. Some do it more openly, others mix interviews with scientists and apparent experts on interesting topics into their podcast and try to balance out their support of right-wing extremism. It makes no difference.
If you still listen to anyone's of these people's podcasts, I want nothing to do with you. You are listening to your own enemy and don't even realize it.
-
If you still listen to the podcast of any of Elon Musk's friends, then you are no friend of mine.
That includes the podcasts of:
- #LexFridman
- #JoeRogan
- #ShaneParrish
- #NavalRavikantElon Musk is a disgusting murderer and nazi and abuser who is fine with pedophelia and enables child pornography.
All mentioned people are friends with him or support him. Some do it more openly, others mix interviews with scientists and apparent experts on interesting topics into their podcast and try to balance out their support of right-wing extremism. It makes no difference.
If you still listen to anyone's of these people's podcasts, I want nothing to do with you. You are listening to your own enemy and don't even realize it.
-
A rational person can find peace by cultivating indifference to things outside of their control.
— Naval Ravikant
-
A rational person can find peace by cultivating indifference to things outside of their control.
— Naval Ravikant
-
A rational person can find peace by cultivating indifference to things outside of their control.
— Naval Ravikant
-
A rational person can find peace by cultivating indifference to things outside of their control.
— Naval Ravikant
-
A rational person can find peace by cultivating indifference to things outside of their control.
— Naval Ravikant
-
These tech-bro capitalists would be almost funny if they weren't so fascist.
-
Absolute fascist.
How anyone can still respect that guy is beyond me.
-
Absolute fascist.
How anyone can still respect that guy is beyond me.
-
Absolute fascist.
How anyone can still respect that guy is beyond me.
-
Absolute fascist.
How anyone can still respect that guy is beyond me.
-
Cancer-like growth or, you know, finally make billionaires and corporations pay fair taxes.
-
Cancer-like growth or, you know, finally make billionaires and corporations pay fair taxes.
-
Cancer-like growth or, you know, finally make billionaires and corporations pay fair taxes.
-
Cancer-like growth or, you know, finally make billionaires and corporations pay fair taxes.
-
Cancer-like growth or, you know, finally make billionaires and corporations pay fair taxes.
-
Fascist fucker.
Wait until people start migrating by the millions, when it starts getting too hot for humans to survive where they live.
Of course that climate-catastrophe-induced scenario is exactly why these capitalist assholes all start calling for closed borders.
-
Fascist fucker.
Wait until people start migrating by the millions, when it starts getting too hot for humans to survive where they live.
Of course that climate-catastrophe-induced scenario is exactly why these capitalist assholes all start calling for closed borders.
-
Fascist fucker.
Wait until people start migrating by the millions, when it starts getting too hot for humans to survive where they live.
Of course that climate-catastrophe-induced scenario is exactly why these capitalist assholes all start calling for closed borders.
-
Fascist fucker.
Wait until people start migrating by the millions, when it starts getting too hot for humans to survive where they live.
Of course that climate-catastrophe-induced scenario is exactly why these capitalist assholes all start calling for closed borders.
-
In case you (or your co-workers) still think of Naval Ravikant as this wise philosopher–
He's just an ultra-far-right (if not fascist) exploitative selfish enemy of humanity.
If you don't believe me, ask the people who were deported to El Salvador or kidnapped to detention centers. Ask families who were separated at the border. Ask the "white trash" poor people who no longer can afford food and other necessities due to Republican policies.
-
In case you (or your co-workers) still think of Naval Ravikant as this wise philosopher–
He's just an ultra-far-right (if not fascist) exploitative selfish enemy of humanity.
If you don't believe me, ask the people who were deported to El Salvador or kidnapped to detention centers. Ask families who were separated at the border. Ask the "white trash" poor people who no longer can afford food and other necessities due to Republican policies.
-
In case you (or your co-workers) still think of Naval Ravikant as this wise philosopher–
He's just an ultra-far-right (if not fascist) exploitative selfish enemy of humanity.
If you don't believe me, ask the people who were deported to El Salvador or kidnapped to detention centers. Ask families who were separated at the border. Ask the "white trash" poor people who no longer can afford food and other necessities due to Republican policies.
-
In case you (or your co-workers) still think of Naval Ravikant as this wise philosopher–
He's just an ultra-far-right (if not fascist) exploitative selfish enemy of humanity.
If you don't believe me, ask the people who were deported to El Salvador or kidnapped to detention centers. Ask families who were separated at the border. Ask the "white trash" poor people who no longer can afford food and other necessities due to Republican policies.
-
A fit body, a calm mind, a house full of love. These things cannot be bought — they must be earned.
— Naval Ravikant
-
A fit body, a calm mind, a house full of love. These things cannot be bought — they must be earned.
— Naval Ravikant