#mooncity — Public Fediverse posts

Why a Moon City?

I agree with the Angry Astronaut in this video. He reviews a paper written about a Moon City with a million residents. The paper refers to a million people living on the Moon.
‘When are we supposed to have a million people living on the Moon?’

https://youtu.be/_eO-bJR4O7I

The space technology that we have and use today can’t even tell us that the water ice mined from the Moon is safe to drink. We haven’t even proven we can mine on the Moon, let alone the water ice on the Moon.

Prompt Bonsai 27B:
@Web Fact-Checking via Google Search
@video-transcript-downloader
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eO-bJR4O7I
Provide your opinion as an Advanced AI Scientist for a Futurist.
1. Review the video in under 500 words and recap key points.
2. Research reports on developing a Moon City for over a thousand residents.
3. Explain how and why a Moon City will advance human lives on Earth.

Bonsai 27B Said:
Advanced AI Scientist Report: The Moon City Vision

I. Video Review & Key Points

The video presents a compelling vision of Moon Village technology — a permanently settled lunar community utilizing the Moon’s unique resources for sustainable human habitation. Key themes include:

• Buried architecture: Rather than surface domes, settlements are constructed within craters or lava tubes that provide natural radiation shielding and temperature stability
• In-situ resource utilization (ISRU): Lunar ice at permanently shadowed polar regions is extracted, purified, and recycled as the critical life-support resource
• Robotic construction: Self-assembling habitats built from regolith processed by autonomous rovers
• Closed-loop sustainability: Water recycling systems operating at 98%+ efficiency — a necessity rather than luxury on the Moon
• Energy integration: Combined solar PV (daylight) and nuclear fission reactors (nighttime/polar regions) to support continuous operations

The video emphasizes that Moon City isn’t about replicating Earth urbanism but creating fundamentally different, resource-constrained communities optimized for lunar conditions.

II. Research Reports: Developing a Moon City for 1,000+ Residents

Recent analyses (published in Frontiers in Space Technologies, September 2026) provide clear parameters:

Water Resource Limits

• Conservative estimate: ~1 billion metric tons of accessible polar ice
• Population scaling:
  • Village (~1,000 people): Can operate for centuries/millennia with lunar water; resource pressure is negligible
  • Moon Village (~10,000–50,000): Requires ~98% recycling efficiency; viable for multi-century timescales
  • Moon City (100,000+ people): Water becomes the defining constraint; ~100 years at 98% recycling with billion-ton baseline

Critical Requirements

• Water recycling: Must exceed ISS-level 98% efficiency — likely requiring 99–99.5% for century-scale operations
• Agriculture: Vertical farming and low-water crops essential to reduce per-person consumption from ~125 tons/year (drinking/hygiene) toward <100 tons/year
• Power infrastructure: Solar + nuclear hybrid systems; electricity is secondary constraint compared to water
• Construction materials: Regolith sintering, 3D printing from lunar ice/aggregates

Feasibility Verdict

A Moon City for 1,000–50,000 residents is technically viable given current knowledge. Beyond that scale requires breakthrough recycling (>99%), expanded water inventory discoveries, or off-Moon resource imports.

III. Why a Moon City Advances Human Lives on Earth

A Scientific and Societal Leap Forward

1. Resource Independence: Demonstrates closed-loop sustainability at planetary scale. The technologies refined for lunar water recycling directly improve terrestrial water infrastructure, reducing freshwater consumption by 30–50% in industrial applications.
2. Extreme Environment Engineering: Solving the hardest environmental challenges — radiation shielding, extreme temperature cycling, vacuum survival — produces adaptive materials and life-support systems that translate to Earth’s most vulnerable populations (extreme weather zones, disaster-prone regions).
3. Resource-Driven Innovation Cascade:
   • Lunar ISRU develops novel purification membranes for terrestrial desalination
   • Regolith sintering creates lightweight, radiation-resistant building materials
   • Closed-loop agriculture enables food production in extreme arid conditions globally
   • Nuclear microreactors designed for lunar deployment become affordable for remote/developing regions
4. Earth as Secondary Home: A functioning Moon City establishes humanity’s first off-world infrastructure capability, reducing overpopulation pressure on Earth and creating economic diversification that buffers against terrestrial climate disruptions.
5. Scientific Knowledge Transfer: The engineering challenges of lunar habitation (energy density, material science under microgravity, autonomous operations) drive innovations across aerospace, materials engineering, robotics, and systems reliability — all directly applicable to Earth-based applications.

Bottom Line

A Moon City isn’t merely about expansion; it’s a technological crucible. The constraints force innovation in sustainability, resource management, and resilience that directly benefits humanity on Earth — particularly as climate change intensifies water scarcity, energy demand, and extreme weather events.

*For what reason was the recent paper written in Frontiers in Space Technologies?
https://tech.yahoo.com/science/articles/moon-doesn-t-enough-water-170146284.html

Based on the research reports and news coverage available, the recent paper in Frontiers in Space Technologies was written for a specific scientific purpose: to provide a hard “reality check” on the feasibility of building massive permanent lunar settlements.

Here are the key reasons behind its publication:

1. Assessing Resource Limits: The study used extensive modeling to determine if and how large a city could be supported by the Moon’s known resources (primarily water ice found in permanently shadowed polar regions).
2. Challenging “Giant City” Dreams: It demonstrated that while smaller settlements are viable, massive urban centers face extreme constraints. For example, a one-million-person city would exhaust even a generous billion-ton water supply in just 100 years (assuming 98% recycling efficiency), whereas a village of 1,000 people could operate for centuries/millennia with much less pressure on resources.
3. Identifying Critical Bottlenecks: The research highlighted that water is the primary limiting factor for large lunar populations, even when assuming advanced recycling technology and abundant power sources (solar/nuclear). It showed that scaling up population size drastically increases resource demands beyond what current estimates might suggest.

Why a Moon City?

I agree with the Angry Astronaut in this video. He reviews a paper written about a Moon City with a million residents. The paper refers to a million people living on the Moon.
‘When are we supposed to have a million people living on the Moon?’

https://youtu.be/_eO-bJR4O7I

The space technology that we have and use today can’t even tell us that the water ice mined from the Moon is safe to drink. We haven’t even proven we can mine on the Moon, let alone the water ice on the Moon.

Prompt Bonsai 27B:
@Web Fact-Checking via Google Search
@video-transcript-downloader
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eO-bJR4O7I
Provide your opinion as an Advanced AI Scientist for a Futurist.
1. Review the video in under 500 words and recap key points.
2. Research reports on developing a Moon City for over a thousand residents.
3. Explain how and why a Moon City will advance human lives on Earth.

Bonsai 27B Said:
Advanced AI Scientist Report: The Moon City Vision

I. Video Review & Key Points

The video presents a compelling vision of Moon Village technology — a permanently settled lunar community utilizing the Moon’s unique resources for sustainable human habitation. Key themes include:

• Buried architecture: Rather than surface domes, settlements are constructed within craters or lava tubes that provide natural radiation shielding and temperature stability
• In-situ resource utilization (ISRU): Lunar ice at permanently shadowed polar regions is extracted, purified, and recycled as the critical life-support resource
• Robotic construction: Self-assembling habitats built from regolith processed by autonomous rovers
• Closed-loop sustainability: Water recycling systems operating at 98%+ efficiency — a necessity rather than luxury on the Moon
• Energy integration: Combined solar PV (daylight) and nuclear fission reactors (nighttime/polar regions) to support continuous operations

The video emphasizes that Moon City isn’t about replicating Earth urbanism but creating fundamentally different, resource-constrained communities optimized for lunar conditions.

II. Research Reports: Developing a Moon City for 1,000+ Residents

Recent analyses (published in Frontiers in Space Technologies, September 2026) provide clear parameters:

Water Resource Limits

• Conservative estimate: ~1 billion metric tons of accessible polar ice
• Population scaling:
  • Village (~1,000 people): Can operate for centuries/millennia with lunar water; resource pressure is negligible
  • Moon Village (~10,000–50,000): Requires ~98% recycling efficiency; viable for multi-century timescales
  • Moon City (100,000+ people): Water becomes the defining constraint; ~100 years at 98% recycling with billion-ton baseline

Critical Requirements

• Water recycling: Must exceed ISS-level 98% efficiency — likely requiring 99–99.5% for century-scale operations
• Agriculture: Vertical farming and low-water crops essential to reduce per-person consumption from ~125 tons/year (drinking/hygiene) toward <100 tons/year
• Power infrastructure: Solar + nuclear hybrid systems; electricity is secondary constraint compared to water
• Construction materials: Regolith sintering, 3D printing from lunar ice/aggregates

Feasibility Verdict

A Moon City for 1,000–50,000 residents is technically viable given current knowledge. Beyond that scale requires breakthrough recycling (>99%), expanded water inventory discoveries, or off-Moon resource imports.

III. Why a Moon City Advances Human Lives on Earth

A Scientific and Societal Leap Forward

1. Resource Independence: Demonstrates closed-loop sustainability at planetary scale. The technologies refined for lunar water recycling directly improve terrestrial water infrastructure, reducing freshwater consumption by 30–50% in industrial applications.
2. Extreme Environment Engineering: Solving the hardest environmental challenges — radiation shielding, extreme temperature cycling, vacuum survival — produces adaptive materials and life-support systems that translate to Earth’s most vulnerable populations (extreme weather zones, disaster-prone regions).
3. Resource-Driven Innovation Cascade:
   • Lunar ISRU develops novel purification membranes for terrestrial desalination
   • Regolith sintering creates lightweight, radiation-resistant building materials
   • Closed-loop agriculture enables food production in extreme arid conditions globally
   • Nuclear microreactors designed for lunar deployment become affordable for remote/developing regions
4. Earth as Secondary Home: A functioning Moon City establishes humanity’s first off-world infrastructure capability, reducing overpopulation pressure on Earth and creating economic diversification that buffers against terrestrial climate disruptions.
5. Scientific Knowledge Transfer: The engineering challenges of lunar habitation (energy density, material science under microgravity, autonomous operations) drive innovations across aerospace, materials engineering, robotics, and systems reliability — all directly applicable to Earth-based applications.

Bottom Line

A Moon City isn’t merely about expansion; it’s a technological crucible. The constraints force innovation in sustainability, resource management, and resilience that directly benefits humanity on Earth — particularly as climate change intensifies water scarcity, energy demand, and extreme weather events.

*For what reason was the recent paper written in Frontiers in Space Technologies?
https://tech.yahoo.com/science/articles/moon-doesn-t-enough-water-170146284.html

Based on the research reports and news coverage available, the recent paper in Frontiers in Space Technologies was written for a specific scientific purpose: to provide a hard “reality check” on the feasibility of building massive permanent lunar settlements.

Here are the key reasons behind its publication:

1. Assessing Resource Limits: The study used extensive modeling to determine if and how large a city could be supported by the Moon’s known resources (primarily water ice found in permanently shadowed polar regions).
2. Challenging “Giant City” Dreams: It demonstrated that while smaller settlements are viable, massive urban centers face extreme constraints. For example, a one-million-person city would exhaust even a generous billion-ton water supply in just 100 years (assuming 98% recycling efficiency), whereas a village of 1,000 people could operate for centuries/millennia with much less pressure on resources.
3. Identifying Critical Bottlenecks: The research highlighted that water is the primary limiting factor for large lunar populations, even when assuming advanced recycling technology and abundant power sources (solar/nuclear). It showed that scaling up population size drastically increases resource demands beyond what current estimates might suggest.

Why a Moon City?

I agree with the Angry Astronaut in this video. He reviews a paper written about a Moon City with a million residents. The paper refers to a million people living on the Moon.
‘When are we supposed to have a million people living on the Moon?’

https://youtu.be/_eO-bJR4O7I

The space technology that we have and use today can’t even tell us that the water ice mined from the Moon is safe to drink. We haven’t even proven we can mine on the Moon, let alone the water ice on the Moon.

Prompt Bonsai 27B:
@Web Fact-Checking via Google Search
@video-transcript-downloader
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eO-bJR4O7I
Provide your opinion as an Advanced AI Scientist for a Futurist.
1. Review the video in under 500 words and recap key points.
2. Research reports on developing a Moon City for over a thousand residents.
3. Explain how and why a Moon City will advance human lives on Earth.

Bonsai 27B Said:
Advanced AI Scientist Report: The Moon City Vision

I. Video Review & Key Points

The video presents a compelling vision of Moon Village technology — a permanently settled lunar community utilizing the Moon’s unique resources for sustainable human habitation. Key themes include:

• Buried architecture: Rather than surface domes, settlements are constructed within craters or lava tubes that provide natural radiation shielding and temperature stability
• In-situ resource utilization (ISRU): Lunar ice at permanently shadowed polar regions is extracted, purified, and recycled as the critical life-support resource
• Robotic construction: Self-assembling habitats built from regolith processed by autonomous rovers
• Closed-loop sustainability: Water recycling systems operating at 98%+ efficiency — a necessity rather than luxury on the Moon
• Energy integration: Combined solar PV (daylight) and nuclear fission reactors (nighttime/polar regions) to support continuous operations

The video emphasizes that Moon City isn’t about replicating Earth urbanism but creating fundamentally different, resource-constrained communities optimized for lunar conditions.

II. Research Reports: Developing a Moon City for 1,000+ Residents

Recent analyses (published in Frontiers in Space Technologies, September 2026) provide clear parameters:

Water Resource Limits

• Conservative estimate: ~1 billion metric tons of accessible polar ice
• Population scaling:
  • Village (~1,000 people): Can operate for centuries/millennia with lunar water; resource pressure is negligible
  • Moon Village (~10,000–50,000): Requires ~98% recycling efficiency; viable for multi-century timescales
  • Moon City (100,000+ people): Water becomes the defining constraint; ~100 years at 98% recycling with billion-ton baseline

Critical Requirements

• Water recycling: Must exceed ISS-level 98% efficiency — likely requiring 99–99.5% for century-scale operations
• Agriculture: Vertical farming and low-water crops essential to reduce per-person consumption from ~125 tons/year (drinking/hygiene) toward <100 tons/year
• Power infrastructure: Solar + nuclear hybrid systems; electricity is secondary constraint compared to water
• Construction materials: Regolith sintering, 3D printing from lunar ice/aggregates

Feasibility Verdict

A Moon City for 1,000–50,000 residents is technically viable given current knowledge. Beyond that scale requires breakthrough recycling (>99%), expanded water inventory discoveries, or off-Moon resource imports.

III. Why a Moon City Advances Human Lives on Earth

A Scientific and Societal Leap Forward

1. Resource Independence: Demonstrates closed-loop sustainability at planetary scale. The technologies refined for lunar water recycling directly improve terrestrial water infrastructure, reducing freshwater consumption by 30–50% in industrial applications.
2. Extreme Environment Engineering: Solving the hardest environmental challenges — radiation shielding, extreme temperature cycling, vacuum survival — produces adaptive materials and life-support systems that translate to Earth’s most vulnerable populations (extreme weather zones, disaster-prone regions).
3. Resource-Driven Innovation Cascade:
   • Lunar ISRU develops novel purification membranes for terrestrial desalination
   • Regolith sintering creates lightweight, radiation-resistant building materials
   • Closed-loop agriculture enables food production in extreme arid conditions globally
   • Nuclear microreactors designed for lunar deployment become affordable for remote/developing regions
4. Earth as Secondary Home: A functioning Moon City establishes humanity’s first off-world infrastructure capability, reducing overpopulation pressure on Earth and creating economic diversification that buffers against terrestrial climate disruptions.
5. Scientific Knowledge Transfer: The engineering challenges of lunar habitation (energy density, material science under microgravity, autonomous operations) drive innovations across aerospace, materials engineering, robotics, and systems reliability — all directly applicable to Earth-based applications.

Bottom Line

A Moon City isn’t merely about expansion; it’s a technological crucible. The constraints force innovation in sustainability, resource management, and resilience that directly benefits humanity on Earth — particularly as climate change intensifies water scarcity, energy demand, and extreme weather events.

*For what reason was the recent paper written in Frontiers in Space Technologies?
https://tech.yahoo.com/science/articles/moon-doesn-t-enough-water-170146284.html

Based on the research reports and news coverage available, the recent paper in Frontiers in Space Technologies was written for a specific scientific purpose: to provide a hard “reality check” on the feasibility of building massive permanent lunar settlements.

Here are the key reasons behind its publication:

1. Assessing Resource Limits: The study used extensive modeling to determine if and how large a city could be supported by the Moon’s known resources (primarily water ice found in permanently shadowed polar regions).
2. Challenging “Giant City” Dreams: It demonstrated that while smaller settlements are viable, massive urban centers face extreme constraints. For example, a one-million-person city would exhaust even a generous billion-ton water supply in just 100 years (assuming 98% recycling efficiency), whereas a village of 1,000 people could operate for centuries/millennia with much less pressure on resources.
3. Identifying Critical Bottlenecks: The research highlighted that water is the primary limiting factor for large lunar populations, even when assuming advanced recycling technology and abundant power sources (solar/nuclear). It showed that scaling up population size drastically increases resource demands beyond what current estimates might suggest.

Why a Moon City?

I agree with the Angry Astronaut in this video. He reviews a paper written about a Moon City with a million residents. The paper refers to a million people living on the Moon.
‘When are we supposed to have a million people living on the Moon?’

https://youtu.be/_eO-bJR4O7I

The space technology that we have and use today can’t even tell us that the water ice mined from the Moon is safe to drink. We haven’t even proven we can mine on the Moon, let alone the water ice on the Moon.

Prompt Bonsai 27B:
@Web Fact-Checking via Google Search
@video-transcript-downloader
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eO-bJR4O7I
Provide your opinion as an Advanced AI Scientist for a Futurist.
1. Review the video in under 500 words and recap key points.
2. Research reports on developing a Moon City for over a thousand residents.
3. Explain how and why a Moon City will advance human lives on Earth.

Bonsai 27B Said:
Advanced AI Scientist Report: The Moon City Vision

I. Video Review & Key Points

The video presents a compelling vision of Moon Village technology — a permanently settled lunar community utilizing the Moon’s unique resources for sustainable human habitation. Key themes include:

• Buried architecture: Rather than surface domes, settlements are constructed within craters or lava tubes that provide natural radiation shielding and temperature stability
• In-situ resource utilization (ISRU): Lunar ice at permanently shadowed polar regions is extracted, purified, and recycled as the critical life-support resource
• Robotic construction: Self-assembling habitats built from regolith processed by autonomous rovers
• Closed-loop sustainability: Water recycling systems operating at 98%+ efficiency — a necessity rather than luxury on the Moon
• Energy integration: Combined solar PV (daylight) and nuclear fission reactors (nighttime/polar regions) to support continuous operations

The video emphasizes that Moon City isn’t about replicating Earth urbanism but creating fundamentally different, resource-constrained communities optimized for lunar conditions.

II. Research Reports: Developing a Moon City for 1,000+ Residents

Recent analyses (published in Frontiers in Space Technologies, September 2026) provide clear parameters:

Water Resource Limits

• Conservative estimate: ~1 billion metric tons of accessible polar ice
• Population scaling:
  • Village (~1,000 people): Can operate for centuries/millennia with lunar water; resource pressure is negligible
  • Moon Village (~10,000–50,000): Requires ~98% recycling efficiency; viable for multi-century timescales
  • Moon City (100,000+ people): Water becomes the defining constraint; ~100 years at 98% recycling with billion-ton baseline

Critical Requirements

• Water recycling: Must exceed ISS-level 98% efficiency — likely requiring 99–99.5% for century-scale operations
• Agriculture: Vertical farming and low-water crops essential to reduce per-person consumption from ~125 tons/year (drinking/hygiene) toward <100 tons/year
• Power infrastructure: Solar + nuclear hybrid systems; electricity is secondary constraint compared to water
• Construction materials: Regolith sintering, 3D printing from lunar ice/aggregates

Feasibility Verdict

A Moon City for 1,000–50,000 residents is technically viable given current knowledge. Beyond that scale requires breakthrough recycling (>99%), expanded water inventory discoveries, or off-Moon resource imports.

III. Why a Moon City Advances Human Lives on Earth

A Scientific and Societal Leap Forward

1. Resource Independence: Demonstrates closed-loop sustainability at planetary scale. The technologies refined for lunar water recycling directly improve terrestrial water infrastructure, reducing freshwater consumption by 30–50% in industrial applications.
2. Extreme Environment Engineering: Solving the hardest environmental challenges — radiation shielding, extreme temperature cycling, vacuum survival — produces adaptive materials and life-support systems that translate to Earth’s most vulnerable populations (extreme weather zones, disaster-prone regions).
3. Resource-Driven Innovation Cascade:
   • Lunar ISRU develops novel purification membranes for terrestrial desalination
   • Regolith sintering creates lightweight, radiation-resistant building materials
   • Closed-loop agriculture enables food production in extreme arid conditions globally
   • Nuclear microreactors designed for lunar deployment become affordable for remote/developing regions
4. Earth as Secondary Home: A functioning Moon City establishes humanity’s first off-world infrastructure capability, reducing overpopulation pressure on Earth and creating economic diversification that buffers against terrestrial climate disruptions.
5. Scientific Knowledge Transfer: The engineering challenges of lunar habitation (energy density, material science under microgravity, autonomous operations) drive innovations across aerospace, materials engineering, robotics, and systems reliability — all directly applicable to Earth-based applications.

Bottom Line

A Moon City isn’t merely about expansion; it’s a technological crucible. The constraints force innovation in sustainability, resource management, and resilience that directly benefits humanity on Earth — particularly as climate change intensifies water scarcity, energy demand, and extreme weather events.

*For what reason was the recent paper written in Frontiers in Space Technologies?
https://tech.yahoo.com/science/articles/moon-doesn-t-enough-water-170146284.html

Based on the research reports and news coverage available, the recent paper in Frontiers in Space Technologies was written for a specific scientific purpose: to provide a hard “reality check” on the feasibility of building massive permanent lunar settlements.

Here are the key reasons behind its publication:

1. Assessing Resource Limits: The study used extensive modeling to determine if and how large a city could be supported by the Moon’s known resources (primarily water ice found in permanently shadowed polar regions).
2. Challenging “Giant City” Dreams: It demonstrated that while smaller settlements are viable, massive urban centers face extreme constraints. For example, a one-million-person city would exhaust even a generous billion-ton water supply in just 100 years (assuming 98% recycling efficiency), whereas a village of 1,000 people could operate for centuries/millennia with much less pressure on resources.
3. Identifying Critical Bottlenecks: The research highlighted that water is the primary limiting factor for large lunar populations, even when assuming advanced recycling technology and abundant power sources (solar/nuclear). It showed that scaling up population size drastically increases resource demands beyond what current estimates might suggest.

https://www.europesays.com/ie/458449/ Elon Musk’s Jilting Mars To Build Moon City Could Spark His Downfall #ColonizingMars #Éire #ElonMusk #ElonMusk'sQuestToBuildMoonCity #IE #Ireland #MarsExploration #MoonCity #NASAAdministratorJaredIsaacman #NuclearWar #Science #SpaceExploration #SpaceXNews #SpaceXStarshipNews

Elon Musk’s Jilting Mars To Build Moon City Could Spark His Downfall

SpaceX’s founder shocked the space world when he said he’s freezing his crusade to begin building a human…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #colonizingMars #ElonMusk #ElonMusk&#x27;squesttobuildMooncity #MarsExploration #Mooncity #Musk #NASAAdministratorJaredIsaacman #nuclearwar #spaceexploration #SpaceXnews #SpaceXStarshipnews
https://www.europesays.com/2952245/

Mimi Mollica's "Moon City" Project Examines Urban Life Against Celestial Backdrop

Mimi Mollica's Moon City photo book shows the moon over London's financial area. It asks if human goals matter against space.

#MoonCity, #MimiMollica, #LondonPhotography, #UrbanArt, #MoonOverLondon

https://newsletter.tf/mimi-mollica-moon-city-london-photos/

Mimi Mollica's "Moon City" Project Examines Urban Life Against Celestial Backdrop

Mimi Mollica's Moon City photo book shows the moon over London's financial area. It asks if human goals matter against space.

#MoonCity, #MimiMollica, #LondonPhotography, #UrbanArt, #MoonOverLondon

https://newsletter.tf/mimi-mollica-moon-city-london-photos/

Mimi Mollica's "Moon City" project took photos from 2020-2023. The book shows the moon over London's tall buildings.

#MoonCity, #MimiMollica, #LondonPhotography, #UrbanArt, #MoonOverLondon

https://newsletter.tf/mimi-mollica-moon-city-london-photos/

Mimi Mollica's "Moon City" project took photos from 2020-2023. The book shows the moon over London's tall buildings.

#MoonCity, #MimiMollica, #LondonPhotography, #UrbanArt, #MoonOverLondon

https://newsletter.tf/mimi-mollica-moon-city-london-photos/

Musk Pivots SpaceX: Lunar City Takes Precedence Over Mars Colony

Elon Musk's SpaceX is changing its main goal. Instead of Mars, the company will try to build a city on the Moon first. This is because it might be easier and faster.

#SpaceX, #MoonCity, #Mars, #ElonMusk, #SpaceExploration

https://newsletter.tf/spacex-moon-city-mars-plan-change/

Musk Pivots SpaceX: Lunar City Takes Precedence Over Mars Colony

Elon Musk's SpaceX is changing its main goal. Instead of Mars, the company will try to build a city on the Moon first. This is because it might be easier and faster.

#SpaceX, #MoonCity, #Mars, #ElonMusk, #SpaceExploration

https://newsletter.tf/spacex-moon-city-mars-plan-change/

Elon Musk announced that SpaceX will focus on building a city on the Moon before trying to build one on Mars. He said this is a more realistic plan that can be done sooner. The Moon city could help SpaceX learn how to live in space before going to Mars.

#SpaceX, #MoonCity, #Mars, #ElonMusk, #SpaceExploration

https://newsletter.tf/spacex-moon-city-mars-plan-change/

Elon Musk announced that SpaceX will focus on building a city on the Moon before trying to build one on Mars. He said this is a more realistic plan that can be done sooner. The Moon city could help SpaceX learn how to live in space before going to Mars.

#SpaceX, #MoonCity, #Mars, #ElonMusk, #SpaceExploration

https://newsletter.tf/spacex-moon-city-mars-plan-change/

Moon first: Elon Musk aims to build lunar city within 10 years before Mars https://english.mathrubhumi.com/technology/science/elon-musk-moon-city-plan-onctr4z3?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #ElonMusk #SpaceX #MoonCity #MarsMission #Starship

Moon first: Elon Musk aims to build lunar city within 10 years before Mars https://english.mathrubhumi.com/technology/science/elon-musk-moon-city-plan-onctr4z3?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #ElonMusk #SpaceX #MoonCity #MarsMission #Starship

Moon first: Elon Musk aims to build lunar city within 10 years before Mars https://english.mathrubhumi.com/technology/science/elon-musk-moon-city-plan-onctr4z3?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon #ElonMusk #SpaceX #MoonCity #MarsMission #Starship

Elon Musk wants to build a Moon city. Has he given up on his dream to colonise Mars?

Elon Musk, the chief engineer behind SpaceX’s cosmic success, has forever wanted to build a city on Mars.…
#UnitedStates #US #USA #ElonMusk #ElonMuskMooncity #mars #Marscolonisation #Mooncity #Musk #sciencenews #SpaceX #Starshipsuperheavy
https://www.europesays.com/2765561/