home.social

#millenniumprize — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #millenniumprize, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. 🚨🚨 Breaking news: Infinite recursion found at the Clay Mathematics Institute's site, where the Navier-Stokes Problem is buried under layer upon layer of "About" pages. 🌀🔍 Meanwhile, mathematicians gather to discuss the real question: which millennium will the Millennium Prize actually be awarded in? 🤔📜
    claymath.org/news/navier-stoke #InfiniteRecursion #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize #MathCommunity #BreakingNews #HackerNews #ngated

  2. 🚨🚨 Breaking news: Infinite recursion found at the Clay Mathematics Institute's site, where the Navier-Stokes Problem is buried under layer upon layer of "About" pages. 🌀🔍 Meanwhile, mathematicians gather to discuss the real question: which millennium will the Millennium Prize actually be awarded in? 🤔📜
    claymath.org/news/navier-stoke #InfiniteRecursion #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize #MathCommunity #BreakingNews #HackerNews #ngated

  3. 🚨🚨 Breaking news: Infinite recursion found at the Clay Mathematics Institute's site, where the Navier-Stokes Problem is buried under layer upon layer of "About" pages. 🌀🔍 Meanwhile, mathematicians gather to discuss the real question: which millennium will the Millennium Prize actually be awarded in? 🤔📜
    claymath.org/news/navier-stoke #InfiniteRecursion #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize #MathCommunity #BreakingNews #HackerNews #ngated

  4. 🚨🚨 Breaking news: Infinite recursion found at the Clay Mathematics Institute's site, where the Navier-Stokes Problem is buried under layer upon layer of "About" pages. 🌀🔍 Meanwhile, mathematicians gather to discuss the real question: which millennium will the Millennium Prize actually be awarded in? 🤔📜
    claymath.org/news/navier-stoke #InfiniteRecursion #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize #MathCommunity #BreakingNews #HackerNews #ngated

  5. Racing to solve maths problems now ‘pointless’, says Australian at centre of OpenAI controversy

    Artificial intelligence has made the race to publish mathematical breakthroughs pointless, according to the Australian professor at the…
    #NewsBeep #News #Artificialintelligence #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #AU #Australia #ChatGPT #Mathematics #maths #millenniumprize #Navier–Stokes #openai #Technology #TristanBuckmaster #unsolvedmathsproblems
    newsbeep.com/au/887878/

  6. OpenAI Claims Navier-Stokes Proof, and Math Pushes Back

    An unreleased OpenAI model produced a claimed proof of a Millennium Prize problem in 88 hours. Mathematicians question the credit and the proof itself.

    pulseofnations.lol/openai-clai

    #AiResearch #Buckmaster #Mathematics #MillenniumPrize #NavierStokes #OpenAI

  7. OpenAI Claims Navier-Stokes Proof, and Math Pushes Back

    An unreleased OpenAI model produced a claimed proof of a Millennium Prize problem in 88 hours. Mathematicians question the credit and the proof itself.

    pulseofnations.lol/openai-clai

    #AiResearch #Buckmaster #Mathematics #MillenniumPrize #NavierStokes #OpenAI

  8. OpenAI Claims Navier-Stokes Proof, and Math Pushes Back

    An unreleased OpenAI model produced a claimed proof of a Millennium Prize problem in 88 hours. Mathematicians question the credit and the proof itself.

    pulseofnations.lol/openai-clai

    #AiResearch #Buckmaster #Mathematics #MillenniumPrize #NavierStokes #OpenAI

  9. OpenAI Claims Navier-Stokes Proof, and Math Pushes Back

    An unreleased OpenAI model produced a claimed proof of a Millennium Prize problem in 88 hours. Mathematicians question the credit and the proof itself.

    pulseofnations.lol/openai-clai

    #AiResearch #Buckmaster #Mathematics #MillenniumPrize #NavierStokes #OpenAI

  10. #navierstokes : "this entire staged event serves a #desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models #openai needs to manufacture an #artificialsputnikmoment claiming to solve a #millenniumprize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional #peerreview means using the prestige of fundamental #mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a #delusionalvaluation!!!

    x.com/bettercallmedhi/status/2

  11. : "this entire staged event serves a financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models needs to manufacture an claiming to solve a without immediately submitting the proof to traditional means using the prestige of fundamental as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a !!!

    x.com/bettercallmedhi/status/2

  12. #navierstokes : "this entire staged event serves a #desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models #openai needs to manufacture an #artificialsputnikmoment claiming to solve a #millenniumprize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional #peerreview means using the prestige of fundamental #mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a #delusionalvaluation!!!

    x.com/bettercallmedhi/status/2

  13. #navierstokes : "this entire staged event serves a #desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models #openai needs to manufacture an #artificialsputnikmoment claiming to solve a #millenniumprize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional #peerreview means using the prestige of fundamental #mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a #delusionalvaluation!!!

    x.com/bettercallmedhi/status/2

  14. AI · OpenAI says it solved a $1M math problem. Rivals object

    OpenAI's unreleased model reportedly proved part of the Navier-Stokes puzzle, but two mathematicians say the company used their unpublished work first.

    Read the rest at: thedailyfathom.com/ai/2026-09-

    #AI #OpenAI #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize #TheDailyFathom

  15. AI · OpenAI says it solved a $1M math problem. Rivals object

    OpenAI's unreleased model reportedly proved part of the Navier-Stokes puzzle, but two mathematicians say the company used their unpublished work first.

    Read the rest at: thedailyfathom.com/ai/2026-09-

    #AI #OpenAI #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize #TheDailyFathom

  16. AI · OpenAI says it solved a $1M math problem. Rivals object

    OpenAI's unreleased model reportedly proved part of the Navier-Stokes puzzle, but two mathematicians say the company used their unpublished work first.

    Read the rest at: thedailyfathom.com/ai/2026-09-

    #AI #OpenAI #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize #TheDailyFathom

  17. AI · OpenAI says it solved a $1M math problem. Rivals object

    OpenAI's unreleased model reportedly proved part of the Navier-Stokes puzzle, but two mathematicians say the company used their unpublished work first.

    Read the rest at: thedailyfathom.com/ai/2026-09-

    #AI #OpenAI #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize #TheDailyFathom

  18. #OpenAI claims it has solved the existence and smoothness problem for the Navier–Stokes equations, one of the seven million-dollar Millennium Prize problems. The proof hasn’t been verified and there’s apparently some drama surrounding who gets the credit if the proof is proven true.

    bbc.com/news/articles/cy7zygy3

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E

    #AI #math #maths #mathematics #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize

  19. #OpenAI claims it has solved the existence and smoothness problem for the Navier–Stokes equations, one of the seven million-dollar Millennium Prize problems. The proof hasn’t been verified and there’s apparently some drama surrounding who gets the credit if the proof is proven true.

    bbc.com/news/articles/cy7zygy3

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E

    #AI #math #maths #mathematics #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize

  20. #OpenAI claims it has solved the existence and smoothness problem for the Navier–Stokes equations, one of the seven million-dollar Millennium Prize problems. The proof hasn’t been verified and there’s apparently some drama surrounding who gets the credit if the proof is proven true.

    bbc.com/news/articles/cy7zygy3

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E

    #AI #math #maths #mathematics #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize

  21. #OpenAI claims it has solved the existence and smoothness problem for the Navier–Stokes equations, one of the seven million-dollar Millennium Prize problems. The proof hasn’t been verified and there’s apparently some drama surrounding who gets the credit if the proof is proven true.

    bbc.com/news/articles/cy7zygy3

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E

    #AI #math #maths #mathematics #NavierStokes #MillenniumPrize

  22. Difficulty of proving the Generalized Poincaré Conjecture as a function of dimension:

    n=1: Trivial

    n=2: Easy (19th century)

    n=3: Perelman (2003), declined Fields Medal

    n=4: Freedman (1982), won Fields Medal

    n≥5: Smale (1961), won Fields Medal

    The difficulty of the generalized Poincaré conjecture is non-monotonic in dimension!

    #Poincaré #PoincaréConjecture #Perelman #FieldsMedal #Geometry #MillenniumPrize #GrigoriPerelman #HenriPoincaré #Freedman #Smale #Conjecture

  23. Difficulty of proving the Generalized Poincaré Conjecture as a function of dimension:

    n=1: Trivial

    n=2: Easy (19th century)

    n=3: Perelman (2003), declined Fields Medal

    n=4: Freedman (1982), won Fields Medal

    n≥5: Smale (1961), won Fields Medal

    The difficulty of the generalized Poincaré conjecture is non-monotonic in dimension!

    #Poincaré #PoincaréConjecture #Perelman #FieldsMedal #Geometry #MillenniumPrize #GrigoriPerelman #HenriPoincaré #Freedman #Smale #Conjecture

  24. Difficulty of proving the Generalized Poincaré Conjecture as a function of dimension:

    n=1: Trivial

    n=2: Easy (19th century)

    n=3: Perelman (2003), declined Fields Medal

    n=4: Freedman (1982), won Fields Medal

    n≥5: Smale (1961), won Fields Medal

    The difficulty of the generalized Poincaré conjecture is non-monotonic in dimension!

    #Poincaré #PoincaréConjecture #Perelman #FieldsMedal #Geometry #MillenniumPrize #GrigoriPerelman #HenriPoincaré #Freedman #Smale #Conjecture

  25. Difficulty of proving the Generalized Poincaré Conjecture as a function of dimension:

    n=1: Trivial

    n=2: Easy (19th century)

    n=3: Perelman (2003), declined Fields Medal

    n=4: Freedman (1982), won Fields Medal

    n≥5: Smale (1961), won Fields Medal

    The difficulty of the generalized Poincaré conjecture is non-monotonic in dimension!

    #Poincaré #PoincaréConjecture #Perelman #FieldsMedal #Geometry #MillenniumPrize #GrigoriPerelman #HenriPoincaré #Freedman #Smale #Conjecture

  26. MillenniumPrizeProblemBench: Thử thách AI với những bài toán khó nhất lịch sử

    Một hệ thống benchmark mới vừa ra đời nhằm đánh giá khả năng giải toán của AI thông qua các Bài toán Thiên niên kỷ (Millennium Prize Problems). Đây là những đề bài toán học chưa có lời giải với phần thưởng 1 triệu USD mỗi bài. Liệu AI có thể vượt qua giới hạn tư duy của con người để giải quyết những bí ẩn này?

    #AI #Mathematics #MillenniumPrize #MachineLearning #Toanhoc #Congnghe #TriTueNhanTao #MPPBench

    https://www.

  27. Nine years ago on a defunct platform I wrote this (and I made a big statement, now-deleted, more below)

    ==== (start quote)
    What do you think of this explanation of the Hodge conjecture by Melbourne mathematician Arun Ram?

    theconversation.com/millennium

    I think it's great: the right level of metaphor and concrete examples that arise from simple cases of the problem.

    [...]

    #mathematics #millenniumprize #hodge #algebraicgeometry
    ==== (end quote)

    Last week I was asked to explain off the cuff the Hodge conjecture by a colleague who is an engineer of some kind. I had recalled from a more recent peep into a certain pop-maths book (mentioned in the [...] above) that the author kinda wimped out, leaving the Hodge conjecture for last and then admitting it was rather complicated. I think I was a bit harsh in what I said in the redacted bit. But that may have been because I don't have the expertise in writing for a popular audience, and this certain person very much did, and held themselves to a higher standard of exposition in both detail and clarity than I would have, nine years ago.

    I'm also slightly cooler on the metaphor in the linked post — it's still a good metaphor, but it doesn't work so well for me now as when I first wrote the above.

  28. Nine years ago on a defunct platform I wrote this (and I made a big statement, now-deleted, more below)

    ==== (start quote)
    What do you think of this explanation of the Hodge conjecture by Melbourne mathematician Arun Ram?

    theconversation.com/millennium

    I think it's great: the right level of metaphor and concrete examples that arise from simple cases of the problem.

    [...]

    #mathematics #millenniumprize #hodge #algebraicgeometry
    ==== (end quote)

    Last week I was asked to explain off the cuff the Hodge conjecture by a colleague who is an engineer of some kind. I had recalled from a more recent peep into a certain pop-maths book (mentioned in the [...] above) that the author kinda wimped out, leaving the Hodge conjecture for last and then admitting it was rather complicated. I think I was a bit harsh in what I said in the redacted bit. But that may have been because I don't have the expertise in writing for a popular audience, and this certain person very much did, and held themselves to a higher standard of exposition in both detail and clarity than I would have, nine years ago.

    I'm also slightly cooler on the metaphor in the linked post — it's still a good metaphor, but it doesn't work so well for me now as when I first wrote the above.

  29. Nine years ago on a defunct platform I wrote this (and I made a big statement, now-deleted, more below)

    ==== (start quote)
    What do you think of this explanation of the Hodge conjecture by Melbourne mathematician Arun Ram?

    theconversation.com/millennium

    I think it's great: the right level of metaphor and concrete examples that arise from simple cases of the problem.

    [...]

    #mathematics #millenniumprize #hodge #algebraicgeometry
    ==== (end quote)

    Last week I was asked to explain off the cuff the Hodge conjecture by a colleague who is an engineer of some kind. I had recalled from a more recent peep into a certain pop-maths book (mentioned in the [...] above) that the author kinda wimped out, leaving the Hodge conjecture for last and then admitting it was rather complicated. I think I was a bit harsh in what I said in the redacted bit. But that may have been because I don't have the expertise in writing for a popular audience, and this certain person very much did, and held themselves to a higher standard of exposition in both detail and clarity than I would have, nine years ago.

    I'm also slightly cooler on the metaphor in the linked post — it's still a good metaphor, but it doesn't work so well for me now as when I first wrote the above.

  30. Nine years ago on a defunct platform I wrote this (and I made a big statement, now-deleted, more below)

    ==== (start quote)
    What do you think of this explanation of the Hodge conjecture by Melbourne mathematician Arun Ram?

    theconversation.com/millennium

    I think it's great: the right level of metaphor and concrete examples that arise from simple cases of the problem.

    [...]

    #mathematics #millenniumprize #hodge #algebraicgeometry
    ==== (end quote)

    Last week I was asked to explain off the cuff the Hodge conjecture by a colleague who is an engineer of some kind. I had recalled from a more recent peep into a certain pop-maths book (mentioned in the [...] above) that the author kinda wimped out, leaving the Hodge conjecture for last and then admitting it was rather complicated. I think I was a bit harsh in what I said in the redacted bit. But that may have been because I don't have the expertise in writing for a popular audience, and this certain person very much did, and held themselves to a higher standard of exposition in both detail and clarity than I would have, nine years ago.

    I'm also slightly cooler on the metaphor in the linked post — it's still a good metaphor, but it doesn't work so well for me now as when I first wrote the above.