#meningsuiting — Public Fediverse posts

Alarm : NoBlogs.org wordt aangevallen door de V.S.

Het naar fascisme ruikende Trump bewind in de V.S. heeft blijkbaar gezien dat het bijna overal mee weg komt. Eerst de sancties naar Francesca Albanese en diverse ICC rechters, en nu dan noblogs.org

Het past in de bully en de afleiding tactieken van de Trump monsters.

Iedere dag weer zijn er aanleidingen voor de mainstream pers om over Trump en z’n vrinden te schrijven, men is daar in de VS bezig om zoveel mogelijk chaos en verwarring te stichten dat het verschil tussen waarheid en feiten in vergelijking met leugens en desinformatie steeds moeilijker te onderscheiden is.

Trump en Co. hebben nu sancties opgelegd voor NoBlogs.org Een gratis blog aanbieder gehost door Autistici/Inventati.

Het is heel erg belangrijk om deze ontwikkelingen te delen met anderen.

Want Francesca Albanese en de door sancties getroffen ICC rechters hebben een publiek gezicht en kwamen schijnbaar heel gemakkelijk met interviews in kranten.

Bij A/I/NoBlogs ligt dat toch heel anders.

Daarom is publiciteit en solidariteit een must.

Lees en Deel !!!  

[REPOST] The Server Called Paranoia: Defend Autistici/Inventati Before September 25

What supporters can do before September 25

Tell the history. Share A/I’s story: the hacklabs, Paranoia, Genoa, the KAOS tours, the Trenitalia victory, the Aruba breach, Plan R*, Noblogs and the Norwegian seizure. Do not allow the government’s description to become the only publicly available account of what A/I is. Build a public defense coalition. Ask independent server collectives, digital-rights organizations, hacklabs, free-software projects, radical libraries, independent publishers, journalists, attorneys, researchers and former users to respond publicly. Preserve the archive. Servers can be seized. Domains can be suspended. Hosts can panic. Back up publicly accessible and historically valuable Noblogs writing, along with A/I’s manifestos, technical documents, legal records and movement history. Record source URLs, authorship, publication dates and retrieval dates. Respect privacy, copyright and removal requests. Do not access private accounts or circumvent security. Personal preservation, research archiving and ordinary journalism are not the same as publicly operating replacement infrastructure; anyone considering a public mirror should first seek qualified advice.

Document over-compliance. Record companies, banks, registrars, platforms and institutions terminating services or removing material. Preserve notices and correspondence. The public record should show how far the designation reaches beyond its formal language. Demand answers. Ask digital-rights groups, European institutions and public officials whether they will permit American sanctions to dismantle an Italian communications collective. Ask what protection exists for European infrastructure, users and archives. Organize independently. Hold public discussions about autonomous infrastructure, sanctions, surveillance and material-support law. Publish explainers. Teach encryption. Support independent civil-liberties work opposing expansive terrorism designations. Prepare lawful material support. A/I has historically survived through voluntary donations, but U.S. supporters should not send or reroute money while the designation applies without a clear authorization. Digital-rights and legal organizations can independently investigate lawful support mechanisms, licensing and potential delisting proceedings.

Listen carefully to A/I’s public response while keeping advocacy legally independent. The collective’s statement should inform how its history and circumstances are described. Any coordinated campaign, fundraising channel or direct service requires separate legal consideration. The immediate objective is to make A/I impossible to quietly disappear.

The network called solidarity

A/I has survived corporations demanding censorship, covert police access, confiscated disks, hostile providers, parliamentary attacks and international investigations. The Trenitalia case produced mirrors and a legal victory. The Aruba breach produced Plan R*. Provider censorship produced redundancy.

The Norwegian seizure demonstrated that the network could recover in hours. Each attempt to isolate the collective spread knowledge about how censorship and surveillance operate. Each attack became an opportunity to teach more people how to protect one another. The United States has now transformed that history into a global test. At stake is not only the survival of one Italian hacker collective. It is whether maintaining infrastructure for radical movements can itself be treated as terrorism; whether privacy can be redefined as concealment; whether refusing to collect identifying information can be presented as obstruction; and whether a provider can be held politically and legally responsible for every text, tactic and claim transmitted through its machines.

A/I has spent twenty-five years preparing for the day when a server disappears. It knows how to replace a machine, move a service, restore encrypted data and continue operating after police or providers pull a plug. The United States is attempting something different. It is trying to frighten banks, hosts, registrars, infrastructure providers and supporters around the world into abandoning the collective. Whether that succeeds will depend partly upon A/I’s architecture.

It will also depend upon us.

Between now and September 25, preserve the history. Share the story. Build the coalition. Document the isolation. Teach the tools. Prepare a lawful defense. Do not allow the state to quietly establish that building privacy-preserving infrastructure for dissent is itself an act of terrorism. Twenty-five years ago, ten people gathered around a recycled machine and deliberately took too long configuring it because everyone in the room was supposed to learn. That remains the lesson. Do not leave the knowledge with experts.

Do not leave the infrastructure in one place. Do not leave the targeted to stand alone.

The first server was called Paranoia.

The network it created was called solidarity.

Alarm : NoBlogs.org wordt aangevallen door de V.S.

Het naar fascisme ruikende Trump bewind in de V.S. heeft blijkbaar gezien dat het bijna overal mee weg komt. Eerst de sancties naar Francesca Albanese en diverse ICC rechters, en nu dan noblogs.org

Het past in de bully en de afleiding tactieken van de Trump monsters.

Iedere dag weer zijn er aanleidingen voor de mainstream pers om over Trump en z’n vrinden te schrijven, men is daar in de VS bezig om zoveel mogelijk chaos en verwarring te stichten dat het verschil tussen waarheid en feiten in vergelijking met leugens en desinformatie steeds moeilijker te onderscheiden is.

Trump en Co. hebben nu sancties opgelegd voor NoBlogs.org Een gratis blog aanbieder gehost door Autistici/Inventati.

Het is heel erg belangrijk om deze ontwikkelingen te delen met anderen.

Want Francesca Albanese en de door sancties getroffen ICC rechters hebben een publiek gezicht en kwamen schijnbaar heel gemakkelijk met interviews in kranten.

Bij A/I/NoBlogs ligt dat toch heel anders.

Daarom is publiciteit en solidariteit een must.

Lees en Deel !!!  

[REPOST] The Server Called Paranoia: Defend Autistici/Inventati Before September 25

What supporters can do before September 25

Tell the history. Share A/I’s story: the hacklabs, Paranoia, Genoa, the KAOS tours, the Trenitalia victory, the Aruba breach, Plan R*, Noblogs and the Norwegian seizure. Do not allow the government’s description to become the only publicly available account of what A/I is. Build a public defense coalition. Ask independent server collectives, digital-rights organizations, hacklabs, free-software projects, radical libraries, independent publishers, journalists, attorneys, researchers and former users to respond publicly. Preserve the archive. Servers can be seized. Domains can be suspended. Hosts can panic. Back up publicly accessible and historically valuable Noblogs writing, along with A/I’s manifestos, technical documents, legal records and movement history. Record source URLs, authorship, publication dates and retrieval dates. Respect privacy, copyright and removal requests. Do not access private accounts or circumvent security. Personal preservation, research archiving and ordinary journalism are not the same as publicly operating replacement infrastructure; anyone considering a public mirror should first seek qualified advice.

Document over-compliance. Record companies, banks, registrars, platforms and institutions terminating services or removing material. Preserve notices and correspondence. The public record should show how far the designation reaches beyond its formal language. Demand answers. Ask digital-rights groups, European institutions and public officials whether they will permit American sanctions to dismantle an Italian communications collective. Ask what protection exists for European infrastructure, users and archives. Organize independently. Hold public discussions about autonomous infrastructure, sanctions, surveillance and material-support law. Publish explainers. Teach encryption. Support independent civil-liberties work opposing expansive terrorism designations. Prepare lawful material support. A/I has historically survived through voluntary donations, but U.S. supporters should not send or reroute money while the designation applies without a clear authorization. Digital-rights and legal organizations can independently investigate lawful support mechanisms, licensing and potential delisting proceedings.

Listen carefully to A/I’s public response while keeping advocacy legally independent. The collective’s statement should inform how its history and circumstances are described. Any coordinated campaign, fundraising channel or direct service requires separate legal consideration. The immediate objective is to make A/I impossible to quietly disappear.

The network called solidarity

A/I has survived corporations demanding censorship, covert police access, confiscated disks, hostile providers, parliamentary attacks and international investigations. The Trenitalia case produced mirrors and a legal victory. The Aruba breach produced Plan R*. Provider censorship produced redundancy.

The Norwegian seizure demonstrated that the network could recover in hours. Each attempt to isolate the collective spread knowledge about how censorship and surveillance operate. Each attack became an opportunity to teach more people how to protect one another. The United States has now transformed that history into a global test. At stake is not only the survival of one Italian hacker collective. It is whether maintaining infrastructure for radical movements can itself be treated as terrorism; whether privacy can be redefined as concealment; whether refusing to collect identifying information can be presented as obstruction; and whether a provider can be held politically and legally responsible for every text, tactic and claim transmitted through its machines.

A/I has spent twenty-five years preparing for the day when a server disappears. It knows how to replace a machine, move a service, restore encrypted data and continue operating after police or providers pull a plug. The United States is attempting something different. It is trying to frighten banks, hosts, registrars, infrastructure providers and supporters around the world into abandoning the collective. Whether that succeeds will depend partly upon A/I’s architecture.

It will also depend upon us.

Between now and September 25, preserve the history. Share the story. Build the coalition. Document the isolation. Teach the tools. Prepare a lawful defense. Do not allow the state to quietly establish that building privacy-preserving infrastructure for dissent is itself an act of terrorism. Twenty-five years ago, ten people gathered around a recycled machine and deliberately took too long configuring it because everyone in the room was supposed to learn. That remains the lesson. Do not leave the knowledge with experts.

Do not leave the infrastructure in one place. Do not leave the targeted to stand alone.

The first server was called Paranoia.

The network it created was called solidarity.

Alarm : NoBlogs.org wordt aangevallen door de V.S.

Het naar fascisme ruikende Trump bewind in de V.S. heeft blijkbaar gezien dat het bijna overal mee weg komt. Eerst de sancties naar Francesca Albanese en diverse ICC rechters, en nu dan noblogs.org

Het past in de bully en de afleiding tactieken van de Trump monsters.

Iedere dag weer zijn er aanleidingen voor de mainstream pers om over Trump en z’n vrinden te schrijven, men is daar in de VS bezig om zoveel mogelijk chaos en verwarring te stichten dat het verschil tussen waarheid en feiten in vergelijking met leugens en desinformatie steeds moeilijker te onderscheiden is.

Trump en Co. hebben nu sancties opgelegd voor NoBlogs.org Een gratis blog aanbieder gehost door Autistici/Inventati.

Het is heel erg belangrijk om deze ontwikkelingen te delen met anderen.

Want Francesca Albanese en de door sancties getroffen ICC rechters hebben een publiek gezicht en kwamen schijnbaar heel gemakkelijk met interviews in kranten.

Bij A/I/NoBlogs ligt dat toch heel anders.

Daarom is publiciteit en solidariteit een must.

Lees en Deel !!!  

[REPOST] The Server Called Paranoia: Defend Autistici/Inventati Before September 25

What supporters can do before September 25

Tell the history. Share A/I’s story: the hacklabs, Paranoia, Genoa, the KAOS tours, the Trenitalia victory, the Aruba breach, Plan R*, Noblogs and the Norwegian seizure. Do not allow the government’s description to become the only publicly available account of what A/I is. Build a public defense coalition. Ask independent server collectives, digital-rights organizations, hacklabs, free-software projects, radical libraries, independent publishers, journalists, attorneys, researchers and former users to respond publicly. Preserve the archive. Servers can be seized. Domains can be suspended. Hosts can panic. Back up publicly accessible and historically valuable Noblogs writing, along with A/I’s manifestos, technical documents, legal records and movement history. Record source URLs, authorship, publication dates and retrieval dates. Respect privacy, copyright and removal requests. Do not access private accounts or circumvent security. Personal preservation, research archiving and ordinary journalism are not the same as publicly operating replacement infrastructure; anyone considering a public mirror should first seek qualified advice.

Document over-compliance. Record companies, banks, registrars, platforms and institutions terminating services or removing material. Preserve notices and correspondence. The public record should show how far the designation reaches beyond its formal language. Demand answers. Ask digital-rights groups, European institutions and public officials whether they will permit American sanctions to dismantle an Italian communications collective. Ask what protection exists for European infrastructure, users and archives. Organize independently. Hold public discussions about autonomous infrastructure, sanctions, surveillance and material-support law. Publish explainers. Teach encryption. Support independent civil-liberties work opposing expansive terrorism designations. Prepare lawful material support. A/I has historically survived through voluntary donations, but U.S. supporters should not send or reroute money while the designation applies without a clear authorization. Digital-rights and legal organizations can independently investigate lawful support mechanisms, licensing and potential delisting proceedings.

Listen carefully to A/I’s public response while keeping advocacy legally independent. The collective’s statement should inform how its history and circumstances are described. Any coordinated campaign, fundraising channel or direct service requires separate legal consideration. The immediate objective is to make A/I impossible to quietly disappear.

The network called solidarity

A/I has survived corporations demanding censorship, covert police access, confiscated disks, hostile providers, parliamentary attacks and international investigations. The Trenitalia case produced mirrors and a legal victory. The Aruba breach produced Plan R*. Provider censorship produced redundancy.

The Norwegian seizure demonstrated that the network could recover in hours. Each attempt to isolate the collective spread knowledge about how censorship and surveillance operate. Each attack became an opportunity to teach more people how to protect one another. The United States has now transformed that history into a global test. At stake is not only the survival of one Italian hacker collective. It is whether maintaining infrastructure for radical movements can itself be treated as terrorism; whether privacy can be redefined as concealment; whether refusing to collect identifying information can be presented as obstruction; and whether a provider can be held politically and legally responsible for every text, tactic and claim transmitted through its machines.

A/I has spent twenty-five years preparing for the day when a server disappears. It knows how to replace a machine, move a service, restore encrypted data and continue operating after police or providers pull a plug. The United States is attempting something different. It is trying to frighten banks, hosts, registrars, infrastructure providers and supporters around the world into abandoning the collective. Whether that succeeds will depend partly upon A/I’s architecture.

It will also depend upon us.

Between now and September 25, preserve the history. Share the story. Build the coalition. Document the isolation. Teach the tools. Prepare a lawful defense. Do not allow the state to quietly establish that building privacy-preserving infrastructure for dissent is itself an act of terrorism. Twenty-five years ago, ten people gathered around a recycled machine and deliberately took too long configuring it because everyone in the room was supposed to learn. That remains the lesson. Do not leave the knowledge with experts.

Do not leave the infrastructure in one place. Do not leave the targeted to stand alone.

The first server was called Paranoia.

The network it created was called solidarity.

Alarm : NoBlogs.org wordt aangevallen door de V.S.

Het naar fascisme ruikende Trump bewind in de V.S. heeft blijkbaar gezien dat het bijna overal mee weg komt. Eerst de sancties naar Francesca Albanese en diverse ICC rechters, en nu dan noblogs.org

Het past in de bully en de afleiding tactieken van de Trump monsters.

Iedere dag weer zijn er aanleidingen voor de mainstream pers om over Trump en z’n vrinden te schrijven, men is daar in de VS bezig om zoveel mogelijk chaos en verwarring te stichten dat het verschil tussen waarheid en feiten in vergelijking met leugens en desinformatie steeds moeilijker te onderscheiden is.

Trump en Co. hebben nu sancties opgelegd voor NoBlogs.org Een gratis blog aanbieder gehost door Autistici/Inventati.

Het is heel erg belangrijk om deze ontwikkelingen te delen met anderen.

Want Francesca Albanese en de door sancties getroffen ICC rechters hebben een publiek gezicht en kwamen schijnbaar heel gemakkelijk met interviews in kranten.

Bij A/I/NoBlogs ligt dat toch heel anders.

Daarom is publiciteit en solidariteit een must.

Lees en Deel !!!  

[REPOST] The Server Called Paranoia: Defend Autistici/Inventati Before September 25

What supporters can do before September 25

Tell the history. Share A/I’s story: the hacklabs, Paranoia, Genoa, the KAOS tours, the Trenitalia victory, the Aruba breach, Plan R*, Noblogs and the Norwegian seizure. Do not allow the government’s description to become the only publicly available account of what A/I is. Build a public defense coalition. Ask independent server collectives, digital-rights organizations, hacklabs, free-software projects, radical libraries, independent publishers, journalists, attorneys, researchers and former users to respond publicly. Preserve the archive. Servers can be seized. Domains can be suspended. Hosts can panic. Back up publicly accessible and historically valuable Noblogs writing, along with A/I’s manifestos, technical documents, legal records and movement history. Record source URLs, authorship, publication dates and retrieval dates. Respect privacy, copyright and removal requests. Do not access private accounts or circumvent security. Personal preservation, research archiving and ordinary journalism are not the same as publicly operating replacement infrastructure; anyone considering a public mirror should first seek qualified advice.

Document over-compliance. Record companies, banks, registrars, platforms and institutions terminating services or removing material. Preserve notices and correspondence. The public record should show how far the designation reaches beyond its formal language. Demand answers. Ask digital-rights groups, European institutions and public officials whether they will permit American sanctions to dismantle an Italian communications collective. Ask what protection exists for European infrastructure, users and archives. Organize independently. Hold public discussions about autonomous infrastructure, sanctions, surveillance and material-support law. Publish explainers. Teach encryption. Support independent civil-liberties work opposing expansive terrorism designations. Prepare lawful material support. A/I has historically survived through voluntary donations, but U.S. supporters should not send or reroute money while the designation applies without a clear authorization. Digital-rights and legal organizations can independently investigate lawful support mechanisms, licensing and potential delisting proceedings.

Listen carefully to A/I’s public response while keeping advocacy legally independent. The collective’s statement should inform how its history and circumstances are described. Any coordinated campaign, fundraising channel or direct service requires separate legal consideration. The immediate objective is to make A/I impossible to quietly disappear.

The network called solidarity

A/I has survived corporations demanding censorship, covert police access, confiscated disks, hostile providers, parliamentary attacks and international investigations. The Trenitalia case produced mirrors and a legal victory. The Aruba breach produced Plan R*. Provider censorship produced redundancy.

The Norwegian seizure demonstrated that the network could recover in hours. Each attempt to isolate the collective spread knowledge about how censorship and surveillance operate. Each attack became an opportunity to teach more people how to protect one another. The United States has now transformed that history into a global test. At stake is not only the survival of one Italian hacker collective. It is whether maintaining infrastructure for radical movements can itself be treated as terrorism; whether privacy can be redefined as concealment; whether refusing to collect identifying information can be presented as obstruction; and whether a provider can be held politically and legally responsible for every text, tactic and claim transmitted through its machines.

A/I has spent twenty-five years preparing for the day when a server disappears. It knows how to replace a machine, move a service, restore encrypted data and continue operating after police or providers pull a plug. The United States is attempting something different. It is trying to frighten banks, hosts, registrars, infrastructure providers and supporters around the world into abandoning the collective. Whether that succeeds will depend partly upon A/I’s architecture.

It will also depend upon us.

Between now and September 25, preserve the history. Share the story. Build the coalition. Document the isolation. Teach the tools. Prepare a lawful defense. Do not allow the state to quietly establish that building privacy-preserving infrastructure for dissent is itself an act of terrorism. Twenty-five years ago, ten people gathered around a recycled machine and deliberately took too long configuring it because everyone in the room was supposed to learn. That remains the lesson. Do not leave the knowledge with experts.

Do not leave the infrastructure in one place. Do not leave the targeted to stand alone.

The first server was called Paranoia.

The network it created was called solidarity.

Alarm : NoBlogs.org wordt aangevallen door de V.S.

Het naar fascisme ruikende Trump bewind in de V.S. heeft blijkbaar gezien dat het bijna overal mee weg komt. Eerst de sancties naar Francesca Albanese en diverse ICC rechters, en nu dan noblogs.org

Het past in de bully en de afleiding tactieken van de Trump monsters.

Iedere dag weer zijn er aanleidingen voor de mainstream pers om over Trump en z’n vrinden te schrijven, men is daar in de VS bezig om zoveel mogelijk chaos en verwarring te stichten dat het verschil tussen waarheid en feiten in vergelijking met leugens en desinformatie steeds moeilijker te onderscheiden is.

Trump en Co. hebben nu sancties opgelegd voor NoBlogs.org Een gratis blog aanbieder gehost door Autistici/Inventati.

Het is heel erg belangrijk om deze ontwikkelingen te delen met anderen.

Want Francesca Albanese en de door sancties getroffen ICC rechters hebben een publiek gezicht en kwamen schijnbaar heel gemakkelijk met interviews in kranten.

Bij A/I/NoBlogs ligt dat toch heel anders.

Daarom is publiciteit en solidariteit een must.

Lees en Deel !!!  

[REPOST] The Server Called Paranoia: Defend Autistici/Inventati Before September 25

What supporters can do before September 25

Tell the history. Share A/I’s story: the hacklabs, Paranoia, Genoa, the KAOS tours, the Trenitalia victory, the Aruba breach, Plan R*, Noblogs and the Norwegian seizure. Do not allow the government’s description to become the only publicly available account of what A/I is. Build a public defense coalition. Ask independent server collectives, digital-rights organizations, hacklabs, free-software projects, radical libraries, independent publishers, journalists, attorneys, researchers and former users to respond publicly. Preserve the archive. Servers can be seized. Domains can be suspended. Hosts can panic. Back up publicly accessible and historically valuable Noblogs writing, along with A/I’s manifestos, technical documents, legal records and movement history. Record source URLs, authorship, publication dates and retrieval dates. Respect privacy, copyright and removal requests. Do not access private accounts or circumvent security. Personal preservation, research archiving and ordinary journalism are not the same as publicly operating replacement infrastructure; anyone considering a public mirror should first seek qualified advice.

Document over-compliance. Record companies, banks, registrars, platforms and institutions terminating services or removing material. Preserve notices and correspondence. The public record should show how far the designation reaches beyond its formal language. Demand answers. Ask digital-rights groups, European institutions and public officials whether they will permit American sanctions to dismantle an Italian communications collective. Ask what protection exists for European infrastructure, users and archives. Organize independently. Hold public discussions about autonomous infrastructure, sanctions, surveillance and material-support law. Publish explainers. Teach encryption. Support independent civil-liberties work opposing expansive terrorism designations. Prepare lawful material support. A/I has historically survived through voluntary donations, but U.S. supporters should not send or reroute money while the designation applies without a clear authorization. Digital-rights and legal organizations can independently investigate lawful support mechanisms, licensing and potential delisting proceedings.

Listen carefully to A/I’s public response while keeping advocacy legally independent. The collective’s statement should inform how its history and circumstances are described. Any coordinated campaign, fundraising channel or direct service requires separate legal consideration. The immediate objective is to make A/I impossible to quietly disappear.

The network called solidarity

A/I has survived corporations demanding censorship, covert police access, confiscated disks, hostile providers, parliamentary attacks and international investigations. The Trenitalia case produced mirrors and a legal victory. The Aruba breach produced Plan R*. Provider censorship produced redundancy.

The Norwegian seizure demonstrated that the network could recover in hours. Each attempt to isolate the collective spread knowledge about how censorship and surveillance operate. Each attack became an opportunity to teach more people how to protect one another. The United States has now transformed that history into a global test. At stake is not only the survival of one Italian hacker collective. It is whether maintaining infrastructure for radical movements can itself be treated as terrorism; whether privacy can be redefined as concealment; whether refusing to collect identifying information can be presented as obstruction; and whether a provider can be held politically and legally responsible for every text, tactic and claim transmitted through its machines.

A/I has spent twenty-five years preparing for the day when a server disappears. It knows how to replace a machine, move a service, restore encrypted data and continue operating after police or providers pull a plug. The United States is attempting something different. It is trying to frighten banks, hosts, registrars, infrastructure providers and supporters around the world into abandoning the collective. Whether that succeeds will depend partly upon A/I’s architecture.

It will also depend upon us.

Between now and September 25, preserve the history. Share the story. Build the coalition. Document the isolation. Teach the tools. Prepare a lawful defense. Do not allow the state to quietly establish that building privacy-preserving infrastructure for dissent is itself an act of terrorism. Twenty-five years ago, ten people gathered around a recycled machine and deliberately took too long configuring it because everyone in the room was supposed to learn. That remains the lesson. Do not leave the knowledge with experts.

Do not leave the infrastructure in one place. Do not leave the targeted to stand alone.

The first server was called Paranoia.

The network it created was called solidarity.

«Op pagina 96 van het #verkiezingsprogramma stelt de #BBB: “We accepteren in het kader van
#handhaving geen #gezichtsbedekking bij #demonstraties.”

Toelichting #NoVA
Het #demonstratierecht, zoals onder meer vervat in art.10 (recht op vrijheid van #meningsuiting) en met art.11 #EVRM (recht op #vrijheid van #vergadering), is #fundamenteel in een #democratische #samenleving. […] De #burgemeester heeft al mogelijkheden om #gezichtsbedekkende kleding tijdens demonstraties te verbieden […]»
(2/…)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WKZ6zkVsdA
#onderwijs #homo #lhbt #vrijheid #grondrecht #geloof #meningsuiting #school #vrijheidvanonderwijs #onderricht #gelijkheid #religie #nederland #onderzoeksjounalistiek #VrijheidVanMeningsuiting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WKZ6zkVsdA
#onderwijs #homo #lhbt #vrijheid #grondrecht #geloof #meningsuiting #school #vrijheidvanonderwijs #onderricht #gelijkheid #religie #nederland #onderzoeksjounalistiek #VrijheidVanMeningsuiting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WKZ6zkVsdA
#onderwijs #homo #lhbt #vrijheid #grondrecht #geloof #meningsuiting #school #vrijheidvanonderwijs #onderricht #gelijkheid #religie #nederland #onderzoeksjounalistiek #VrijheidVanMeningsuiting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WKZ6zkVsdA
#onderwijs #homo #lhbt #vrijheid #grondrecht #geloof #meningsuiting #school #vrijheidvanonderwijs #onderricht #gelijkheid #religie #nederland #onderzoeksjounalistiek #VrijheidVanMeningsuiting

Er gaat een groot kruis ❌ door de vrijheid van meningsuiting en dús democratie in de VS.
Musk die voor totale vrijheid v. meningsuiting zegt te zijn zorgt ervoor dat mensen niet meer durven praten ⁉️

Hier
https://www.amnesty.nl/encyclopedie/vrijheid-van-meningsuiting

#nieuws
#democratie
#trump #usa
#musk #dictator
#meningsuiting
#amendement1
#grondwet
#vrijheid
#onderdrukking
#autocratie
#politico

Laatste nieuws daar Politico:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/21/trump-gutted-climate-policy-across-federal-government-00204998

Er gaat een groot kruis ❌ door de vrijheid van meningsuiting en dús democratie in de VS.
Musk die voor totale vrijheid v. meningsuiting zegt te zijn zorgt ervoor dat mensen niet meer durven praten ⁉️

Hier
https://www.amnesty.nl/encyclopedie/vrijheid-van-meningsuiting

#nieuws
#democratie
#trump #usa
#musk #dictator
#meningsuiting
#amendement1
#grondwet
#vrijheid
#onderdrukking
#autocratie
#politico

Laatste nieuws daar Politico:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/21/trump-gutted-climate-policy-across-federal-government-00204998

Er gaat een groot kruis ❌ door de vrijheid van meningsuiting en dús democratie in de VS.
Musk die voor totale vrijheid v. meningsuiting zegt te zijn zorgt ervoor dat mensen niet meer durven praten ⁉️

Hier
https://www.amnesty.nl/encyclopedie/vrijheid-van-meningsuiting

#nieuws
#democratie
#trump #usa
#musk #dictator
#meningsuiting
#amendement1
#grondwet
#vrijheid
#onderdrukking
#autocratie
#politico

Laatste nieuws daar Politico:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/21/trump-gutted-climate-policy-across-federal-government-00204998

Er gaat een groot kruis ❌ door de vrijheid van meningsuiting en dús democratie in de VS.
Musk die voor totale vrijheid v. meningsuiting zegt te zijn zorgt ervoor dat mensen niet meer durven praten ⁉️

Hier
https://www.amnesty.nl/encyclopedie/vrijheid-van-meningsuiting

#nieuws
#democratie
#trump #usa
#musk #dictator
#meningsuiting
#amendement1
#grondwet
#vrijheid
#onderdrukking
#autocratie
#politico

Laatste nieuws daar Politico:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/21/trump-gutted-climate-policy-across-federal-government-00204998

"Meta, moederbedrijf Instagram en Facebook stopt met #factcheck-ers."

Ik maak geen gebruik van #bigtech platforms en ben niet afhankelijk van hun #moderatie.

Daarom is #mastodon zo mooi. Een #federatie van instances die zelf hun moderatie bepalen.

En ieder zou een eigen instance kunnen opzetten. Een uitstekende balans van moderatie en #vrijheid van #meningsuiting (#vvmu) wordt zo bereikt.

#centraal vs #decentraal
#blackbox vs #opensource
#bigtech vs #community

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/01/07/moederbedrijf-instagram-en-facebook-stopt-met-factcheckers-a4878723

"Meta, moederbedrijf Instagram en Facebook stopt met #factcheck-ers."

Ik maak geen gebruik van #bigtech platforms en ben niet afhankelijk van hun #moderatie.

Daarom is #mastodon zo mooi. Een #federatie van instances die zelf hun moderatie bepalen.

En ieder zou een eigen instance kunnen opzetten. Een uitstekende balans van moderatie en #vrijheid van #meningsuiting (#vvmu) wordt zo bereikt.

#centraal vs #decentraal
#blackbox vs #opensource
#bigtech vs #community

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/01/07/moederbedrijf-instagram-en-facebook-stopt-met-factcheckers-a4878723

"Meta, moederbedrijf Instagram en Facebook stopt met #factcheck-ers."

Ik maak geen gebruik van #bigtech platforms en ben niet afhankelijk van hun #moderatie.

Daarom is #mastodon zo mooi. Een #federatie van instances die zelf hun moderatie bepalen.

En ieder zou een eigen instance kunnen opzetten. Een uitstekende balans van moderatie en #vrijheid van #meningsuiting (#vvmu) wordt zo bereikt.

#centraal vs #decentraal
#blackbox vs #opensource
#bigtech vs #community

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/01/07/moederbedrijf-instagram-en-facebook-stopt-met-factcheckers-a4878723

"Meta, moederbedrijf Instagram en Facebook stopt met #factcheck-ers."

Ik maak geen gebruik van #bigtech platforms en ben niet afhankelijk van hun #moderatie.

Daarom is #mastodon zo mooi. Een #federatie van instances die zelf hun moderatie bepalen.

En ieder zou een eigen instance kunnen opzetten. Een uitstekende balans van moderatie en #vrijheid van #meningsuiting (#vvmu) wordt zo bereikt.

#centraal vs #decentraal
#blackbox vs #opensource
#bigtech vs #community

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/01/07/moederbedrijf-instagram-en-facebook-stopt-met-factcheckers-a4878723

"Meta, moederbedrijf Instagram en Facebook stopt met #factcheck-ers."

Ik maak geen gebruik van #bigtech platforms en ben niet afhankelijk van hun #moderatie.

Daarom is #mastodon zo mooi. Een #federatie van instances die zelf hun moderatie bepalen.

En ieder zou een eigen instance kunnen opzetten. Een uitstekende balans van moderatie en #vrijheid van #meningsuiting (#vvmu) wordt zo bereikt.

#centraal vs #decentraal
#blackbox vs #opensource
#bigtech vs #community

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/01/07/moederbedrijf-instagram-en-facebook-stopt-met-factcheckers-a4878723

"De kern van onze strijd is het behoud van #fundamentele #vrijheden binnen de Europese Unie. We hopen dat het Hof ons standpunt erkent en een precedent schept voor de #bescherming van #vrijheid van #meningsuiting. #Censuur is niet de juiste manier om #desinformatie te bestrijden. Het is van cruciaal belang dat we blijven vechten voor een #vrij en #open #internet. Voor nu is het afwachten tot de uitspraak van het Hof, waar nog geen datum voor staat."

https://www.bit.nl/news/3568/293/Vrijheid-van-meningsuiting-versus-censuur

#rechtsstaat

"De kern van onze strijd is het behoud van #fundamentele #vrijheden binnen de Europese Unie. We hopen dat het Hof ons standpunt erkent en een precedent schept voor de #bescherming van #vrijheid van #meningsuiting. #Censuur is niet de juiste manier om #desinformatie te bestrijden. Het is van cruciaal belang dat we blijven vechten voor een #vrij en #open #internet. Voor nu is het afwachten tot de uitspraak van het Hof, waar nog geen datum voor staat."

https://www.bit.nl/news/3568/293/Vrijheid-van-meningsuiting-versus-censuur

#rechtsstaat

"De kern van onze strijd is het behoud van #fundamentele #vrijheden binnen de Europese Unie. We hopen dat het Hof ons standpunt erkent en een precedent schept voor de #bescherming van #vrijheid van #meningsuiting. #Censuur is niet de juiste manier om #desinformatie te bestrijden. Het is van cruciaal belang dat we blijven vechten voor een #vrij en #open #internet. Voor nu is het afwachten tot de uitspraak van het Hof, waar nog geen datum voor staat."

https://www.bit.nl/news/3568/293/Vrijheid-van-meningsuiting-versus-censuur

#rechtsstaat

"De kern van onze strijd is het behoud van #fundamentele #vrijheden binnen de Europese Unie. We hopen dat het Hof ons standpunt erkent en een precedent schept voor de #bescherming van #vrijheid van #meningsuiting. #Censuur is niet de juiste manier om #desinformatie te bestrijden. Het is van cruciaal belang dat we blijven vechten voor een #vrij en #open #internet. Voor nu is het afwachten tot de uitspraak van het Hof, waar nog geen datum voor staat."

https://www.bit.nl/news/3568/293/Vrijheid-van-meningsuiting-versus-censuur

#rechtsstaat

"De kern van onze strijd is het behoud van #fundamentele #vrijheden binnen de Europese Unie. We hopen dat het Hof ons standpunt erkent en een precedent schept voor de #bescherming van #vrijheid van #meningsuiting. #Censuur is niet de juiste manier om #desinformatie te bestrijden. Het is van cruciaal belang dat we blijven vechten voor een #vrij en #open #internet. Voor nu is het afwachten tot de uitspraak van het Hof, waar nog geen datum voor staat."

https://www.bit.nl/news/3568/293/Vrijheid-van-meningsuiting-versus-censuur

#rechtsstaat