#maoism — Public Fediverse posts

#china #socialism #maoism #massmurder

#china #socialism #maoism #massmurder

Police Announce The Arrest Of A CPI (Maoist) Regional Committee Member In Latehar District

In a statement issued to the press today, Jharkhand State Police (JSP) announced that they have arrested CPI (Maoist) Regional Committee Member Ravindra Ganjhu in Latehar district.

According to the JSP statement, they received intelligence inputs that Mr. Ganjhu was hiding in Latehar district, either to execute a major incident or to meet his squad. Acting on this information, a joint team of Latehar District Police (LDP) and Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) jawans launched a combing operation, cordoned off the area, and apprehended Mr. Ganjhu.

According to the JSP statement, an AK-56 rifle, a pistol and a large quantity of ammunition were recovered from Mr. Ganjhu’s possession. The press release went on to say that Mr. Ganjhu’s capture had remained a challenge for security personnel for years while he was operating underground and allegedly overseeing Maoist activities in the region, and that he was wanted in connection with several Maoist-related cases.

The JSP statement claimed that Mr. Ganjhu played a pivotal role in most major Maoist attacks that occurred prior to 2019 across the Latehar, Lohardaga and Mccluskieganj area of Ranchi, and that various security agencies had been monitoring his activities for a long time.

As per the JSP press report Mr. Ganjhu first came to attention of the authorities following the Lukaiya ambush. He was purported to have orchestrated an ambush on security forces in the Lukaiya area, located on the inter-district border of Lohardaga and Latehar, resulting in the deaths of four security personnel. Following this incident, a massive operation named ‘Operation Double Bull’ was launched in February 2022 to apprehend Mr. Ganjhu, but he managed to evade security forces and operate freely up until now.

According to the JSP report, Mr. Ganjhu was said to be the last remaining top-ranking Maoist leader active in the region.

Source : https://www.newindianexpress.com/india/2026/Jul/13/jharkhand-police-arrest-top-maoist-leader-ravindra-ganjhu-in-major-anti-naxal-breakthrough

🧵Cabral applied Marxist analysis to the social structure in Guinea. He recognised the significant physical force of the peasant class, but he argued that the peasantry in Guinea did not have active political consciousness, and thus they didn't act as the primary revolutionary subject. Cabral doesn't follow Maoism in this matter, as in China the peasantry had a history of revolting and political awareness.

Cabral inverts common Marxist class analysis, arguing that the only group equipped with the literacy and organisational tools to seize the state is the petite bourgeoisie. However, he identifies the petite bourgeoisie as a service class, not rooted in economic productivity.

So upon decolonisation the petite bourgeoisie could either inherit state power and try to preserve itself by becoming more bourgeois, or it could strengthen its revolutionary consciousness and ally with the working class. Cabral introduces the concept of class suicide.

Cabral argues that the petite bourgeoisie has more frequent contact with the colonisers, and is therefore more often humiliated. This leads to a higher level of political awareness of the need for liberation.

#cabral #CaboVerde #GuineaBissau #PAIGC #marxism #maoism #decolonisation

🧵Cabral applied Marxist analysis to the social structure in Guinea. He recognised the significant physical force of the peasant class, but he argued that the peasantry in Guinea did not have active political consciousness, and thus they didn't act as the primary revolutionary subject. Cabral doesn't follow Maoism in this matter, as in China the peasantry had a history of revolting and political awareness.

Cabral inverts common Marxist class analysis, arguing that the only group equipped with the literacy and organisational tools to seize the state is the petite bourgeoisie. However, he identifies the petite bourgeoisie as a service class, not rooted in economic productivity.

So upon decolonisation the petite bourgeoisie could either inherit state power and try to preserve itself by becoming more bourgeois, or it could strengthen its revolutionary consciousness and ally with the working class. Cabral introduces the concept of class suicide.

Cabral argues that the petite bourgeoisie has more frequent contact with the colonisers, and is therefore more often humiliated. This leads to a higher level of political awareness of the need for liberation.

#cabral #CaboVerde #GuineaBissau #PAIGC #marxism #maoism #decolonisation

🧵Cabral applied Marxist analysis to the social structure in Guinea. He recognised the significant physical force of the peasant class, but he argued that the peasantry in Guinea did not have active political consciousness, and thus they didn't act as the primary revolutionary subject. Cabral doesn't follow Maoism in this matter, as in China the peasantry had a history of revolting and political awareness.

Cabral inverts common Marxist class analysis, arguing that the only group equipped with the literacy and organisational tools to seize the state is the petite bourgeoisie. However, he identifies the petite bourgeoisie as a service class, not rooted in economic productivity.

So upon decolonisation the petite bourgeoisie could either inherit state power and try to preserve itself by becoming more bourgeois, or it could strengthen its revolutionary consciousness and ally with the working class. Cabral introduces the concept of class suicide.

Cabral argues that the petite bourgeoisie has more frequent contact with the colonisers, and is therefore more often humiliated. This leads to a higher level of political awareness of the need for liberation.

#cabral #CaboVerde #GuineaBissau #PAIGC #marxism #maoism #decolonisation

🧵Cabral applied Marxist analysis to the social structure in Guinea. He recognised the significant physical force of the peasant class, but he argued that the peasantry in Guinea did not have active political consciousness, and thus they didn't act as the primary revolutionary subject. Cabral doesn't follow Maoism in this matter, as in China the peasantry had a history of revolting and political awareness.

Cabral inverts common Marxist class analysis, arguing that the only group equipped with the literacy and organisational tools to seize the state is the petite bourgeoisie. However, he identifies the petite bourgeoisie as a service class, not rooted in economic productivity.

So upon decolonisation the petite bourgeoisie could either inherit state power and try to preserve itself by becoming more bourgeois, or it could strengthen its revolutionary consciousness and ally with the working class. Cabral introduces the concept of class suicide.

Cabral argues that the petite bourgeoisie has more frequent contact with the colonisers, and is therefore more often humiliated. This leads to a higher level of political awareness of the need for liberation.

#cabral #CaboVerde #GuineaBissau #PAIGC #marxism #maoism #decolonisation

On Ideological Struggle: An Essay By K. Murali (Ajith)

When a revolutionary movement faces a crisis the struggle to achieve ideological clarity becomes even more crucial. We have the high standards set by comrade Charu Mazumdar (CM) as a model to follow. The period leading to the Naxalbari armed peasant rebellion, the struggle to form the party and the following years-all were marked by intense ideological struggle. Some of the attacks on the line and practice of the party led by him were quite possibly influenced by state agents. Kanu Sanyal and some other erstwhile members of the Central Committee launched an open attack from inside the jail. This could have been branded as something done under pressure from the state. But that was not how these attacks were handled. CM focused on ideological, political issues. He stuck to this. Even when attacks on the line were colored by personal allegations. This approach did not emerge from some personal trait of CM. It was guided by Mao Zedong’s teachings on handling criticism and ideological struggle.

In times of crisis, ideological and political confusion infects many people. This gets reflected as some amount of slackening in organizational discipline. Quite often comrades start looking for answers ‘on their own’, rather than adhering to proper organizational channels. They may even meet up with those who have declared their opposition to the revolutionary path. All of this no doubt creates room for ‘left’ and right opportunists and state agents to cause trouble. But it would be wrong in principle and counter-productive to hastily brand such comrades as accomplices. Their confusion must be overcome through ideological education. Care must also be taken to avoid playing into the hands of the enemy by compromising the security of those with whom we disagree. Instead of distracting with allegations and counter-allegations on who is, or is not, an agent, who met with whom and why etc., the focus should be on ideological, political issues. Efforts must be concentrated on analyzing the factors leading to the setback and patient ideological, political and organizational work to overcome it. Mao taught us to ‘unite the many to defeat the few’.

The Maoist movement in our country did see a negative trend of branding criticism as the work of state agents. This was after the martyrdom of CM. Mahadev Mukherjee declared himself to be the one and only true follower of CM. Anyone who opposed this was declared to be an agent. Not surprisingly he was a staunch supporter of Lin Biao. He remained so even after Lin Biao was denounced as a proponent of a ‘left’ in form right in essence deviation by the Communist Party of China led by Mao Zedong. Lin Biao and his associates tried to assassinate Mao and carry out a coup. He died while trying to flee the country. But the campaign to ‘Criticize Lin Biao and Confucius’ was not about these criminal acts. They were focused on his ideological, political views, their links with the reactionary views of Confucius and their negative implications in continuing the class struggle under the dictatorship of the proletariat. Lin Biao and his supporters had a major role in leading the Cultural Revolution in the initial years. During that time the stress was more on branding capitalist roaders as Kuomintang agents etc. But after he was overthrown, the whole struggle against the capitalist road was deepened in a profound manner at the ideological level. New understanding on the ideological, political and material factors leading to the transformation of former revolutionaries into capitalist roaders was developed through this. Hurling accusations and branding people or deepening ideological struggle? It would be worthwhile to keep the lessons of history in mind while seeking answers.

K. Murali (Ajith)

July 4, 2026

Source : https://ajithspage.in/wp/pages/lekhanam-essay/english/ideological-struggle/

Hey fedi, it's been a while, im doing even worse than i was previously, still got no money or income, cant afford any food, just been rotting in my room unable to do anything bc chronic disability, i need help affording food bc i dont get any help from family, please donate so i dont die of starvation, i have nobody to help me.

Current Goal: 0$/500$

Payment Information:

paypal: https://paypal.me/redvelvetxxx

cashapp: https://cash.app/vparagon

monero address: 8576pqM8cmNW92eogjqnYzEewZbmwUbY61xRcGmbVCFphchaXKyAad1Xj9oNrYWQNqZkcm2kCHEzea4Y5Wd3DMUW4DozSV2

@lgbtq @FediAid @mutualaid @mutualaid @disability @trans

#mutualaid #mutualaidrequest #donate #donation #fundraiser #crowdfunding #crowdfund #transmutualaid #transcrowdfund #queermutualaid #disabilitymutualaid #emergencycrowdfund #helpfolkslive2025 #begpost #lgbtq #lgbt #lgbtqia #lgbtqia2 #queer #queeradvocacy #trans #transgender #transfem #transfemme #transbian #lesbian #gay #anarchism #anarchist #anarchy #communism #communist #socialism #socialist #marxism #leninism #maoism #marxismleninism #marxismleninismmaoism #xmr #monero #crypto #linux #bsd #freebsd #foss #opensource #freesoftware

Hey fedi, it's been a while, im doing even worse than i was previously, still got no money or income, cant afford any food, just been rotting in my room unable to do anything bc chronic disability, i need help affording food bc i dont get any help from family, please donate so i dont die of starvation, i have nobody to help me.

Current Goal: 0$/500$

Payment Information:

paypal: https://paypal.me/redvelvetxxx

cashapp: https://cash.app/vparagon

monero address: 8576pqM8cmNW92eogjqnYzEewZbmwUbY61xRcGmbVCFphchaXKyAad1Xj9oNrYWQNqZkcm2kCHEzea4Y5Wd3DMUW4DozSV2

@lgbtq @FediAid @mutualaid @mutualaid @disability @trans

#mutualaid #mutualaidrequest #donate #donation #fundraiser #crowdfunding #crowdfund #transmutualaid #transcrowdfund #queermutualaid #disabilitymutualaid #emergencycrowdfund #helpfolkslive2025 #begpost #lgbtq #lgbt #lgbtqia #lgbtqia2 #queer #queeradvocacy #trans #transgender #transfem #transfemme #transbian #lesbian #gay #anarchism #anarchist #anarchy #communism #communist #socialism #socialist #marxism #leninism #maoism #marxismleninism #marxismleninismmaoism #xmr #monero #crypto #linux #bsd #freebsd #foss #opensource #freesoftware

Wumaos know that dissent is un-Chinese /s

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2132858/wumaos-know-that-dissent-is-un-chinese-s

Wumaos know that dissent is un-Chinese /s

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2132858/wumaos-know-that-dissent-is-un-chinese-s

From a certain point of view

From a certain point of view

History is Calling us: Let’s Follow Kaypakkaya’s Path! — TKP-ML/MKP

With rifles in hand, they traversed the rugged mountain trails with great boldness and conviction, fully aware that they were fundamentally shaking the course of history. As the leader representing the communist face of the 1971 armed revolutionary breakaway, İbrahim Kaypakkaya, through the theses he put forward, both captured a fundamental break and shattered all the untouchables of the fascist dictatorship; he also tore through the fifty-year-old veil of reformist capitulation with a knife and cast it into the dustbin of history.

Comrade Ibrahim Kaypakkaya, the indomitable bastion of theory and practice, of word and deed, personally led the way in walking the path of his own claims. In accordance with the historical role of the struggle, he was the first to take up arms and set out on the path through the mountains. By exposing the reformist, liquidationist essence of the struggle—which was being confined to magazine offices and conference halls—he resolutely demonstrated that liberation lies in the arming of the workers and peasants, and that the task of the class vanguard is to open the path to the class’s arming. Comrade Leader İbrahim Kaypakkaya proved that he was the communist intellectual of the working class by turning his words into action.

History, within its own cycle, has vindicated Comrade Leader; before long, workers and peasants flocked to the revolutionary struggle in droves. This was what could not be seen in the pitch-black darkness of March 12, and Comrade Leader İbrahim Kaypakkaya has slammed this reality in the face of every form of liquidationism.

Today, however, the historical cycle has created a new dilemma. Either a free world will be created through the power of necessity to create the new; or, swept into the vortex of reformism, pacifism, and every current that rejects the revolutionary option, we will become mere pillars of this decaying, obsolete order of the past. This is precisely the dilemma being imposed on the international communist movement and the international proletariat today.

The pillars of the imperialist capitalist system have eroded. The imperialist capitalist system is floundering in a crisis vortex. The widening and deepening of the rift between imperialist blocs has intensified the struggle for dominance over market areas and trade routes. Shrinking markets and losses of hegemony are pushing the imperialist bloc led by the U.S. and Britain into a more aggressive and belligerent stance against China and Russia.

At this stage, the doors to a new imperialist war of partition are being forced wide open. Conflicts and wars have become widespread, particularly in the Middle East and Africa, in line with imperialist competition.

Precisely for this reason, a comprehensive campaign of liquidation has been launched against the communist and resistance movements engaged in armed struggle, aimed at preventing the oppressed peoples of the world from turning to the revolutionary option in the face of this crisis. The concept of annihilation and destruction has been put into action through various means.

The rulers of the imperialist capitalist system have launched comprehensive military operations to physically annihilate the international communist and revolutionary movement; where they have failed, they are attempting to achieve this from within by imposing a line of surrender and betrayal. This is the role played by the traitors who emerged from within the CPI(M). These traitors serve as tools of the imperialist capitalists’ concept of liquidation and annihilation.

In our country as well, the masses are searching for answers in the face of the poverty and misery they endure. The Turkish ruling classes are waging an intense offensive to keep the spontaneously developing mass movement within the bounds of the system. They have deployed every means to keep the masses’ reactions and anger within legal limits, attempting to suppress them through repression and violence. In line with their imperialist masters, while on one hand conducting military operations against the armed struggle front and ideologically propagating that “the era of arms has ended,” on the other hand, they are striving to narrow the actual legitimate arenas of struggle as much as possible.

And of course, reformists and other currents that reject the revolutionary struggle are coming to the aid of the Turkish ruling class. The fact that the Turkish Revolutionary Movement has been pushed back to the legal boundaries has left it facing a serious ideological siege.

Today, the masses’ need for a vanguard to clear the path is greater than ever. The illegal armed struggle front is the breakwater against the wave of liquidationism. Today, no line of struggle that does not strategically address the armed struggle can break through fascism and imperialist encirclement, nor can it mobilize the masses to fight against imperialist encirclement. If the masses are not organized around revolutionary violence, their descent into reactionary nationalist sentiments, chauvinism, and the poisonous circle of patriarchy will be inevitable. In this sense, while organizing the working class and the broad masses against the oppression of the AKP-MHP regime is one aspect of the task, the other aspect is the revolutionary duty of the moment: to keep the advanced masses vigilant against the reformist, revisionist, and pacifist currents clustered around the CHP. We can only advance the path opened by our Leader Comrade on this basis and prove worthy of the legacy he left us. To this end, the development of a united revolutionary struggle stands before us as an imperative task.

The path that our Leader Comrade İbrahim Kaypakkaya did not hesitate to walk remains relevant today. This is the only true path that will lead the working class and the oppressed laborers to liberation. It is within our power to embark on this path and break free from routines and entrenched habits. Marching forward and advancing through struggle is the tradition of our struggle. This tradition is the sole legacy left to us by our leader comrade.

We will not hesitate for a single moment to march forward through struggle on the path opened by our leader comrade; we will advance along the path he opened. This is the call of our leader comrade that reaches us today.

Long live Marxism-Leninism-Maoism!

Long live Proletarian Internationalism!

Heed Kaypakkaya’s call, and advance along the path he has opened!

Maoist Communist Party

Communist Party of Turkey – Marxist Leninist

May 2026

source: TKP-ML

I think most countries abandoned forced sterilization after WW2, but I hear it's making a comeback in the USA as well. Critical support for the comrades in DHS, I guess.

I think most countries abandoned forced sterilization after WW2, but I hear it's making a comeback in the USA as well. Critical support for the comrades in DHS, I guess.

I think most countries abandoned forced sterilization after WW2, but I hear it's making a comeback in the USA as well. Critical support for the comrades in DHS, I guess.

I think most countries abandoned forced sterilization after WW2, but I hear it's making a comeback in the USA as well. Critical support for the comrades in DHS, I guess.

I think most countries abandoned forced sterilization after WW2, but I hear it's making a comeback in the USA as well. Critical support for the comrades in DHS, I guess.

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2119609/i-think-most-countries-abandoned-forced-sterilization-after-ww2-but-i-hear-it-s-making

CIAnarchists won't stop listening to Uyghurs, smh

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2118377/cianarchists-won-t-stop-listening-to-uyghurs-smh

CIAnarchists won't stop listening to Uyghurs, smh

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2118377/cianarchists-won-t-stop-listening-to-uyghurs-smh

Ban on Seven Books and Issues of the Newspapers Yeni Demokrasi and Sosyalizm U Azadi: Türkiye

In Türkiye,, the Tunceli District Court ordered the withdrawal of seven books, as well as a ban on their publication, distribution, and sale. The titles in question are works by authors associated with the revolutionary left: “Heroic Songs” by Muzaffer Oruçoğlu, “The Dawn of Communism” by Arif Çelebi, “The Guide to Courage” by Nazlı Gürbüz Top, “Our Çakır: The Life of a Revolutionary” by Mukaddes Erdoğdu, “On Life” by Kutsiye Bozoklar, “Materialist Philosophy” by İbrahim Okçuoğlu, and “On the Illuminated Slopes of Struggle” by Serkan Günebakan.

Judicial authorities believe these publications contain elements constituting “terrorist propaganda,” justifying their confiscation and ban. At the same time, several newspapers, including four issues of Yeni Demokrasi and 14 of Sosyalizm U Azadi, have also been subject to similar court decisions, with distribution suspended and seizures. These measures are part of a series of proceedings targeting publications accused of disseminating content deemed illegal by the authorities.

source: Secours Rouge

Average tankie entryist:

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2107428/average-tankie-entryist

Average tankie entryist:

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2107428/average-tankie-entryist

Every good Space Marine has a copy of Gorillaman's Little Blueberry Book!

https://piefed.social/c/grimdank/p/2100622/every-good-space-marine-has-a-copy-of-gorillaman-s-little-blueberry-book

Every good Space Marine has a copy of Gorillaman's Little Blueberry Book!

Every good Space Marine has a copy of Gorillaman's Little Blueberry Book!

Every good Space Marine has a copy of Gorillaman's Little Blueberry Book!

Every good Space Marine has a copy of Gorillaman's Little Blueberry Book!

https://piefed.social/c/grimdank/p/2100622/every-good-space-marine-has-a-copy-of-gorillaman-s-little-blueberry-book

Nothing wrong with a bit of doublethink, eh comrade?

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2099661/nothing-wrong-with-a-bit-of-doublethink-eh-comrade

Nothing wrong with a bit of doublethink, eh comrade?

In Shanghai, 800,000 workers joined a general strike and armed insurrection, crushed the warlord forces and took control of the city. In Hunan, Hubei, ...

This five-part series examines the politics of the Communist Party Marxist-Kenya, its defence of the Stalinist-Maoist theory of the National Democratic Revolution and its opposition to Trotskyism.#China #Kenya #NationalDemocraticRevolution #UnevenandCombinedDevelopment #Maoism #multipolar #Trotskyism
Communist Party Marxist - Kenya defends counter-revolutionary Maoist strategy against Trotskyism—Part 4

TKP-ML Joint Statement: Let’s Follow Kaypakkaya’s Path!

History Is Calling Us: Let’s Follow Kaypakkaya’s Path!

With rifles in hand, they traversed the rugged mountain trails with great boldness and conviction, fully aware that they were fundamentally shaking the course of history. As the leader representing the communist face of the 1971 armed revolutionary breakaway, İbrahim Kaypakkaya, through the theses he put forward, both captured a fundamental break and shattered all the untouchables of the fascist dictatorship; he also tore through the fifty-year-old veil of reformist capitulation with a knife and cast it into the dustbin of history.

Comrade Ibrahim Kaypakkaya, the indomitable bastion of theory and practice, of word and deed, personally led the way in walking the path of his own claims. In accordance with the historical role of the struggle, he was the first to take up arms and set out on the path through the mountains. By exposing the reformist, liquidationist essence of the struggle—which was being confined to magazine offices and conference halls—he resolutely demonstrated that liberation lies in the arming of the workers and peasants, and that the task of the class vanguard is to open the path to the class’s arming. Comrade Leader İbrahim Kaypakkaya proved that he was the communist intellectual of the working class by turning his words into action.

History, within its own cycle, has vindicated Comrade Leader; before long, workers and peasants flocked to the revolutionary struggle in droves. This was what could not be seen in the pitch-black darkness of March 12, and Comrade Leader İbrahim Kaypakkaya has slammed this reality in the face of every form of liquidationism.

Today, however, the historical cycle has created a new dilemma. Either a free world will be created through the power of necessity to create the new; or, swept into the vortex of reformism, pacifism, and every current that rejects the revolutionary option, we will become mere pillars of this decaying, obsolete order of the past. This is precisely the dilemma being imposed on the international communist movement and the international proletariat today.

The pillars of the imperialist capitalist system have eroded. The imperialist capitalist system is floundering in a crisis vortex. The widening and deepening of the rift between imperialist blocs has intensified the struggle for dominance over market areas and trade routes. Shrinking markets and losses of hegemony are pushing the imperialist bloc led by the U.S. and Britain into a more aggressive and belligerent stance against China and Russia.

At this stage, the doors to a new imperialist war of partition are being forced wide open. Conflicts and wars have become widespread, particularly in the Middle East and Africa, in line with imperialist competition.

Precisely for this reason, a comprehensive campaign of liquidation has been launched against the communist and resistance movements engaged in armed struggle, aimed at preventing the oppressed peoples of the world from turning to the revolutionary option in the face of this crisis. The concept of annihilation and destruction has been put into action through various means.

The rulers of the imperialist capitalist system have launched comprehensive military operations to physically annihilate the international communist and revolutionary movement; where they have failed, they are attempting to achieve this from within by imposing a line of surrender and betrayal. This is the role played by the traitors who emerged from within the CPI (Maoist). These traitors serve as tools of the imperialist capitalists’ concept of liquidation and annihilation.

In our country as well, the masses are searching for answers in the face of the poverty and misery they endure. The Turkish ruling classes are waging an intense offensive to keep the spontaneously developing mass movement within the bounds of the system. They have deployed every means to keep the masses’ reactions and anger within legal limits, attempting to suppress them through repression and violence. In line with their imperialist masters, while on one hand conducting military operations against the armed struggle front and ideologically propagating that “the era of arms has ended,” on the other hand, they are striving to narrow the actual legitimate arenas of struggle as much as possible.

And of course, reformists and other currents that reject the revolutionary struggle are coming to the aid of the Turkish ruling class. The fact that the Turkish Revolutionary Movement has been pushed back to the legal boundaries has left it facing a serious ideological siege.

Today, the masses’ need for a vanguard to clear the path is greater than ever. The illegal armed struggle front is the breakwater against the wave of liquidationism. Today, no line of struggle that does not strategically address the armed struggle can break through fascism and imperialist encirclement, nor can it mobilize the masses to fight against imperialist encirclement. If the masses are not organized around revolutionary violence, their descent into reactionary nationalist sentiments, chauvinism, and the poisonous circle of patriarchy will be inevitable. In this sense, while organizing the working class and the broad masses against the oppression of the AKP-MHP regime is one aspect of the task, the other aspect is the revolutionary duty of the moment: to keep the advanced masses vigilant against the reformist, revisionist, and pacifist currents clustered around the CHP. We can only advance the path opened by our Leader Comrade on this basis and prove worthy of the legacy he left us. To this end, the development of a united revolutionary struggle stands before us as an imperative task.

The path that our Leader Comrade İbrahim Kaypakkaya did not hesitate to walk remains relevant today. This is the only true path that will lead the working class and the oppressed laborers to liberation. It is within our power to embark on this path and break free from routines and entrenched habits. Marching forward and advancing through struggle is the tradition of our struggle. This tradition is the sole legacy left to us by our leader comrade.

We will not hesitate for a single moment to march forward through struggle on the path opened by our leader comrade; we will advance along the path he opened. This is the call of our leader comrade that reaches us today.

Long live Marxism-Leninism-Maoism!

Long live Proletarian Internationalism!

Heed Kaypakkaya’s call, and advance along the path he has opened!

Maoist Communist Party

Communist Party of Turkey – Marxist Leninist

May 2026

Source : https://www.tkpml.com/joint-statement-history-is-calling-us-lets-follow-kaypakkayas-path/

PBSP/Bangladesh Statement: CPI (Maoist) Must Continue The PPW To Complete The New Democratic Revolution In India

India: Surrender-No Revolution Possible via Parliamentarism or So-Called Unarmed Mass Uprisings!

Must Continue the People’s War to Complete the New Democratic Revolution!

March 24th, 2026

The ongoing People’s War in India is crossing a major crisis. To destroy it, a horrific repressive campaign named ‘Operation Kagaar’ was launched at the beginning of 2024. Their target is to make India ‘Maoist-free’ by March 2026. After the failure of various repressive operations like ‘Salwa Judum’, ‘Green Hunt’, ‘Samadhan’, and ‘Prahar’ launched since 2009 with the aid of imperialism, the ruling bureaucrat-comprador capitalist class is now conducting this brutal “Kagaar” operation. For this purpose, the ruling class is carrying out genocide by violating their own constitution, laws, and regulations. In this repressive campaign, many tribal people, along with the Party’s General Secretary Basavaraj, PLGA chief Hidma, women’s leader Renuka, and hundreds of leaders and cadres of various levels, have embraced heroic martyrdom.

The Maoists of India were not only successfully resisting these repressive campaigns of the Hindutva fascist Modi government but were also continuing counterattacks.] However, exhausted by this repression, the liquidationist Sonu-Satish clique within the party emerged in mid-2025 with a ‘Surrender Line’ of “establishing peace” in the name of a ceasefire. According to government versions, several thousand leaders and cadres have surrendered following that line. On the other hand, the media-created secretary Tirupati alias Devji, who took an opportunist position to save his life after being arrested by the enemy, called Sonu-Satish traitors in an interview from a government guesthouse. At the same time, he is demanding the lifting of the government ban on the party and the dissolution of the PLGA. Both lines are liquidationist. Frustrated by government repression, they are abandoning the revolutionary path of Naxalbari and bringing forth a revisionist-liquidationist line.

This government-produced liquidationist line is a part of the Kagaar repressive operation itself. Caught in the crisis of government repression, a section of the former Maoist leadership has abandoned the Maoist path of liberation for oppressed nations and people—the line of continued revolution. They have adopted a line of compromise and conciliation with the pro-imperialist and anti-people politics of the Brahmanical Hindutva fascists Modi-Amit. They have fallen into the trap of the conspiracy to destroy the revolution. This is temporarily putting the ongoing People’s War into a crisis. In this case, the liquidationist right-wing Surrender Line created from within the party has caused much more damage to the Maoist People’s War than the government’s mercenary forces. They want to liquidate the Party and the Revolution in exchange for begging for their own lives.

After the setback of the Naxalbari movement in the ’70s, various forms of revisionist-liquidationist lines called the Naxalbari line/path “adventurist,” claiming that armed struggle or People’s War was not possible. In those difficult times, true followers of Maoism clung to the line of Naxalbari’s People’s War and, through a process of summation, built base areas in today’s Dandakaranya-Chhattisgarh. Although the Naxalbari uprising defeated the revisionism entrenched in India, it was defeated before it could form a consolidated force, develop a victorious People’s War, and establish bases. In Dandakaranya, a brigade-level guerrilla force (PLGA) was formed under the party’s leadership, and a People’s Government was established under the patronage of that force. Therefore, history shows that revolutionary struggle and People’s War do not end once defeated. Rather, they return larger and stronger.

It is true that the People’s War has suffered a major blow due to the repression of Operation Kagaar and has been temporarily defeated. However, it is not correct to say that this defeat means the end of the People’s War. This is because the fundamental problem—the exploitation and oppression of the semi-colonial and semi-feudal system that gave birth to and developed the Maoist Party—has not been resolved. This system itself is the enemy of the people, exploitative, oppressive, and a lackey of imperialism. Therefore, it is impossible to destroy the Maoist Party and the People’s War led by it.

In the last 70 years, many changes have occurred in India’s production system and the imperialist world system. Although the semi-colonial and semi-feudal system fundamentally continues, many new forms/types of it have developed. Taking these into account, the military line and program must be developed. Indian Maoists have paid attention to these new issues and are trying to develop their line based on them. This new development must be grasped through the synthesis of the experiences of the last 50 years while clinging to the path of People’s War—not by liquidating the Party and abandoning the path of People’s War or surrendering.

In the face of this disaster and loss, not only in India but also in our country, the election-oriented Left and Social Democrats are opposing the path of seizing power through People’s War. They are once again bringing forward the parliamentary “pigsty” path and the rhetoric of establishing revolution/socialism through so-called mass uprisings.

These mass-uprisingists cite the examples of ousting the fascist Hasina or the military autocrat Ershad in the ’90s. But what lessons do we learn from these two mass uprisings? In such uprisings, there is no change in the ruling bureaucrat-comprador bourgeois-feudal system controlled by imperialism and expansionism. One clique of the ruling class replaces another in power. For instance, in ’90, military autocracy was removed to establish parliamentary autocracy. When that parliamentary autocracy eventually turned into Awami fascism, they were ousted in the 2024 mass uprising, and the NGOs and civil society of the ruling class came to power. Then, through the February elections, the people, angry with the Awami League, voted for the BNP. Without the decisive role of the Army—the protector of the ruling class—the hand-over of power would not have been possible.

After Hasina fled, some tried to deceive by using the word “revolution,” but in reality, let alone a revolution, no significant or pro-people reform has taken place. Not a single treaty with imperialism-expansionism has been canceled, nor has any program for the liberation of the oppressed people—including workers, peasants, the poor, students, youth, women, and indigenous people—been implemented.

Therefore, to achieve the New Democratic Revolution toward the goal of socialism, the path of People’s War must be adopted. People’s War means a war of the people. The people will participate in that war only when there is a program suited to their interests. People’s War is not a matter of mere tactics; rather, it is part of the political line of the proletariat. No revolution can occur without defeating the various armed forces of the ruling class—the protectors of the existing enemy-of-the-people system —through a Protracted People’s War. Therefore, to make a revolution, the people must build their own army, which is only possible under the leadership of the revolutionary party of the proletariat and under a revolutionary program.

The Maoist Party of India, with the aim of seizing state power based on the line of People’s War, formed the PLGA through the process of implementing the Agrarian Revolution program via Dalams (squads) and established the Janatana (People’s) Government. That government lasted for nearly 20 years. An unarmed mass uprising is not capable of achieving that. However, the opportunity of a mass uprising can be utilized under the People’s War. That is a different matter.

After starting the People’s War, surrender means maintaining the old system. The parliamentary path or parliamentarism means accepting that system and drowning in the so-called ‘mainstream’ politics of the ruling class. And the line of so-called unarmed mass uprising is to use the people, who are angry with one ruling clique, for the benefit of a new/other ruling clique, attempting to make the ongoing exploitative system tolerable.

Therefore, no matter how difficult the path, in a neo-colonial, bureaucrat-capitalist, and semi-feudal country oppressed by imperialism, the only revolutionary path—the People’s War—must be continued to achieve the New Democratic Revolution toward socialism.

[Note: Published on People’s Political Bulletin/April 2026 of PBSP/Bangladesh]

source: Red Spark

China had a rough century

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2043963/china-had-a-rough-century

China had a rough century

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2043963/china-had-a-rough-century

China had a rough century

China had a rough century

China had a rough century

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2043963/china-had-a-rough-century

The Praxis of the Chinese Communist Party is just beyond our tiny shitlib brains

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2037481/the-praxis-of-the-chinese-communist-party-is-just-beyond-our-tiny-shitlib-brains

The Praxis of the Chinese Communist Party is just beyond our tiny shitlib brains

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2037481/the-praxis-of-the-chinese-communist-party-is-just-beyond-our-tiny-shitlib-brains

Don't worry, the PEOPLE'S cultural genocide will set those nasty Uyghurs right! Just a few more generations of 'reeducation camps' and sterilization, promise!

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2020178/don-t-worry-the-people-s-cultural-genocide-will-set-those-nasty-uyghurs-right-just-a-fe

Don't worry, the PEOPLE'S cultural genocide will set those nasty Uyghurs right! Just a few more generations of 'reeducation camps' and sterilization, promise!

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2020178/don-t-worry-the-people-s-cultural-genocide-will-set-those-nasty-uyghurs-right-just-a-fe

"No! Never! Unless... you were a dangerous intellectual..."

https://piefed.social/c/historymemes/p/2001804/no-never-unless-you-were-a-dangerous-intellectual

"No! Never! Unless... you were a dangerous intellectual..."

https://piefed.social/c/historymemes/p/2001804/no-never-unless-you-were-a-dangerous-intellectual

"No! Never! Unless... you were a dangerous intellectual..."

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2001803/no-never-unless-you-were-a-dangerous-intellectual

"No! Never! Unless... you were a dangerous intellectual..."

https://piefed.social/c/tankiejerk/p/2001803/no-never-unless-you-were-a-dangerous-intellectual