home.social

#lpa — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #lpa, aggregated by home.social.

  1. 6 Wochen sind vergangen seit dem zweiten Infarkt. Es kommt etwas Ruhe rein. Jeder kleine Schritt ist hart erkämpft, aber es geht voran. Es gibt jetzt einen Termin für die Bypass-OP, es ist allerdings noch etwas hin, scheine kein Notfall zu sein. Das gibt mir etwas Zuversicht, es geht um die langfristige Perspektive. Ansonsten gab es einen Termin in der Lipidambulanz. Schnell wird klar, dass […]

    https://blog.hamdorf.org/herzinfarkt-iii/

  2. Flight: #TRA6779
    Registration: PH-HXB
    ICAO code: #48520A
    Callsign: #TRANSAVIA
    Operator: Transavia Holland
    Type: BOEING 737-8K2
    Country: 🇳🇱
    From: #EIN to #LPA
    Speed: 632 kmh
    Altitude: 7757 m
    Distance: 2.4 km
    Angle ∆: 72.7°
    Direction ->: SW
    Track:
    tinyurl.com/2dnjv4dg
    History:
    radarbox.com/data/mode-s/48520A
    flightradar24.com/data/aircraf
    Photos:
    jetphotos.com/photo/keyword/PH
    Seen: 60x

  3. Flight: #BEL37L
    ICAO code: #44CC41
    Callsign: #BEELINE
    Operator: Brussels Airlines
    Country: 🇧🇪
    From: #LPA to #BRU
    Speed: 454 kmh
    Altitude: 2134 m
    Distance: 2.1 km
    Angle ∆: 45.6°
    Direction ->: NE
    Track:
    tinyurl.com/2b2gepjg
    History:
    radarbox.com/data/mode-s/44CC41
    Seen: 553x
    #Landing #BrusselsAirport

  4. Flight: #BEL37L
    ICAO code: #44CC41
    Callsign: #BEELINE
    Operator: Brussels Airlines
    Country: 🇧🇪
    From: #LPA to #BRU
    Speed: 494 kmh
    Altitude: 3353 m
    Distance: 7.6 km
    Angle ∆: 23.9°
    Direction ->: E
    Track:
    tinyurl.com/24vvuy7v
    History:
    radarbox.com/data/mode-s/44CC41
    Seen: 546x
    #Landing #BrusselsAirport

  5. Flight: #TFL6CN
    Registration: OO-TUV
    ICAO code: #44D2B6
    Callsign: #ORANGE
    Operator: Tui Airlines Nederland
    Type: BOEING 737-86J
    Country: 🇳🇱
    From: #EIN to #LPA
    Speed: 740 kmh
    Altitude: 5700 m
    Distance: 1.6 km
    Angle ∆: 74.2°
    Direction ->: SW
    Track:
    tinyurl.com/2d3fgxn9
    History:
    radarbox.com/data/mode-s/44D2B6
    flightradar24.com/data/aircraf
    Photos:
    jetphotos.com/photo/keyword/OO
    Seen: 212x

  6. Microsegmentation has proven valuable in preventing attackers from moving laterally throughout the environment as well as helping organizations implement zero trust strategies and enforce the principle of least privilege access.

    Elisity raised $27M series B funding to continue to expand its microsegmentation platform.

    #cybersecurity #security #microsegmentation #microseg #zerotrust #lpa #LeastPrivilegeAccess #funding

    wsj.com/articles/elisity-raise

  7. #psychometrics community: I found a paper that developed a short scale and tested it via #LPA and #kmeans clustering. (Paper here: journals.plos.org/plosone/arti). Now for me, this is odd as it uses two clustering techniques to assess scale quality. But then again this is a sociology paper and I know that sociologists and psychologists have a different world view. In case you didn't know: Sociologists tend to look at groups within society or societies at large, whereas psychologists tend to see individuals and groups as aggregates of individuals. Obviously, coming from a sociological perspective, using such clustering methods makes sense. However, I still have mixed feelings about this approach. I still feel a IRT approach would be better since obviously k-means and LPA does NOTHING to evaluate items, for example.

    How do you see this? Am I completely wrong here?