home.social

#locationsharing — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #locationsharing, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. DATE: August 28, 2026 at 12:13PM
    SOURCE: SOCIALPSYCHOLOGY.ORG

    TITLE: Why People Share Their Location Data With Friends and Family

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    Source: PsyPost

    People frequently track the real-time geographic movements of their close friends and family members through smartphone applications. A new survey of adults reveals that users most often share their whereabouts with romantic partners to manage practical logistics, while relying on the technology to monitor the physical safety of their parents and siblings. The findings were published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #LocationSharing #FamilySafety #GPSTracking #SmartphonePrivacy #RelationshipsTech #ShareYourLocation #ParentalMonitoring #TrustAndTechnology #RealTimeLocation #SocialMediaTrends

  2. DATE: August 28, 2026 at 12:13PM
    SOURCE: SOCIALPSYCHOLOGY.ORG

    TITLE: Why People Share Their Location Data With Friends and Family

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    Source: PsyPost

    People frequently track the real-time geographic movements of their close friends and family members through smartphone applications. A new survey of adults reveals that users most often share their whereabouts with romantic partners to manage practical logistics, while relying on the technology to monitor the physical safety of their parents and siblings. The findings were published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #LocationSharing #FamilySafety #GPSTracking #SmartphonePrivacy #RelationshipsTech #ShareYourLocation #ParentalMonitoring #TrustAndTechnology #RealTimeLocation #SocialMediaTrends

  3. DATE: August 28, 2026 at 12:13PM
    SOURCE: SOCIALPSYCHOLOGY.ORG

    TITLE: Why People Share Their Location Data With Friends and Family

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    Source: PsyPost

    People frequently track the real-time geographic movements of their close friends and family members through smartphone applications. A new survey of adults reveals that users most often share their whereabouts with romantic partners to manage practical logistics, while relying on the technology to monitor the physical safety of their parents and siblings. The findings were published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

    URL: socialpsychology.org/client/re

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #LocationSharing #FamilySafety #GPSTracking #SmartphonePrivacy #RelationshipsTech #ShareYourLocation #ParentalMonitoring #TrustAndTechnology #RealTimeLocation #SocialMediaTrends

  4. DATE: August 28, 2026 at 06:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: The psychology of why people share their smartphone location data with friends and family

    URL: psypost.org/why-people-share-t

    People frequently track the real-time geographic movements of their close friends and family members through smartphone applications. A new survey of adults reveals that users most often share their whereabouts with romantic partners to manage practical logistics, while relying on the technology to monitor the physical safety of their parents and siblings. The findings were published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

    Modern smartphones come equipped with a variety of tools that allow users to continuously broadcast their exact physical location to others. Features like Apple’s Find My, Google Maps, and dedicated tracking programs such as Life360 are increasingly common fixtures in daily life. Past research on this technology has often focused on specific risks, such as digital stalking or a loss of trust in romantic relationships. Other studies have examined how parents use these applications to monitor their adolescent children.

    Yet little data exists regarding the broader social networks of location sharing. Researchers wanted to understand the full scope of who receives this access and the specific motivations driving these digital disclosures. Brian G. Ogolsky, a researcher at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and his colleagues sought to categorize the everyday habits of smartphone users. They grounded their work in communication privacy management theory, which suggests that people constantly negotiate the boundaries between personal privacy and social disclosure.

    By treating geographic coordinates as a form of private information, the researchers aimed to map the changing norms of digital intimacy. Traditionally, social scientists have viewed privacy management as an active choice, where a person decides to reveal specific details in a specific moment. Smartphone tracking, however, creates a continuous and ambient stream of data. The research team wanted to know how people navigate this distinct type of constant revelation.

    To gather the data, Ogolsky and his team recruited 203 adults between the ages of 19 and 59. The participants were required to own a smartphone and currently share their location with at least one person. During an online survey, participants opened their tracking applications and counted the total number of people who could see their movements. They then categorized their relationships with each person on the list.

    Participants also answered open-ended questions detailing why they initially allowed access and why they continued to do so over time. The research team manually categorized the written responses, coding them into dozens of specific themes before collapsing them into four primary categories. This qualitative approach allowed the researchers to preserve the respondents’ own descriptions of their social behaviors.

    The survey revealed that participants broadcast their location to an average of nearly four people. However, the majority of the respondents shared their whereabouts with just one or two individuals, indicating that people maintain tight privacy boundaries even with ambient technology. Romantic partners were the most common recipients of this information, selected by over 62 percent of the respondents. Friends and siblings were the next most common categories, followed by mothers, fathers, and children.

    When analyzing the motivations for broadcasting physical movements, the researchers identified safety as the most frequently cited reason across the entire survey. Participants described using the technology to gain peace of mind and to ensure they could receive help in an emergency. They also mentioned safety in the context of developmental transitions, such as tracking a teenager who recently started driving or monitoring an aging parent who might face cognitive decline. The researchers noted that this type of safety is entirely passive, as it relies on the other person choosing to check the application when assistance is needed.

    The second major category of motivation was practicality. People used location data to navigate the logistics of daily life, such as checking if a partner had left work or timing a dinner preparation. This allowed them to stay informed without needing to send a text message or make a phone call to ask for an estimated time of arrival. In this specific group of participants, staying informed of a partner’s movements was usually described as an issue of efficiency rather than an attempt to exert control.

    A third category involved casual reasons for keeping tracking features active. Many participants cited sheer indifference, noting that they had forgotten the application was running or simply had no reason to turn it off. Some tracking applications enable location sharing by default, meaning users might accidentally broadcast their data continuously. Other respondents described using the technology purely for entertainment, with one participant noting that they “find it funny to check each other’s location and send texts about it.”

    The final category involved relationship processes. In these instances, participants viewed the act of revealing their location as a way to maintain closeness or build trust. Some individuals used the continuous stream of geographic data to demonstrate transparency in a romantic partnership, offering explanations such as, “Because I’m fine with it. I have nothing to hide.” A small number of respondents reported sharing their location due to direct pressure from a partner or a cultural expectation that roommates should automatically know each other’s whereabouts.

    The researchers then compared the reasons for sharing against the specific types of relationships. The motivations shifted depending on the person receiving the data. For romantic partners and friends, practical reasons dominated the decision to keep tracking applications active. These individuals likely spend a large portion of their time together and need efficient ways to coordinate shared schedules.

    By contrast, safety was the primary driver for giving access to family members. Parents, children, and extended family members were granted access primarily to alleviate worries about physical well-being. Because adult children often live far away from their aging parents or extended family, location tracking provides a way to maintain a sense of connection and security across long physical distances.

    The study relied on a specific demographic sample that was largely white, heterosexual, and highly educated. Because all participants already used tracking software, the results do not capture the perspectives of people who actively avoid the technology due to privacy concerns. The researchers also did not directly ask participants about intimate partner violence. This omission might have resulted in an underreporting of digital surveillance, controlling behaviors, or a lack of trust.

    Future research will need to explore how digital boundaries change as tracking algorithms become more deeply integrated into daily life. Scientists also hope to investigate whether relying on passive digital tracking replaces traditional conversations, and how skipping basic logistical check-ins might alter interpersonal communication.

    The study, “Near, Far, Wherever You Are: With Whom and Why Do People Use Location Sharing in Relationships,” was authored by Brian G. Ogolsky, Matthew Rivas-Koehl, Evaline Y. Li, Ghada Kawas, Emily J. Charvat, Christopher R. Maniotes and Jennifer L. Hardesty.

    URL: psypost.org/why-people-share-t

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #LocationSharing #DigitalPrivacy #FindMy #Life360 #SmartphoneTracking #RelationshipDynamics #SafetyFirst #PracticalTracking #PrivacyManagement #AmbientDisclosure

  5. DATE: August 28, 2026 at 06:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: The psychology of why people share their smartphone location data with friends and family

    URL: psypost.org/why-people-share-t

    People frequently track the real-time geographic movements of their close friends and family members through smartphone applications. A new survey of adults reveals that users most often share their whereabouts with romantic partners to manage practical logistics, while relying on the technology to monitor the physical safety of their parents and siblings. The findings were published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

    Modern smartphones come equipped with a variety of tools that allow users to continuously broadcast their exact physical location to others. Features like Apple’s Find My, Google Maps, and dedicated tracking programs such as Life360 are increasingly common fixtures in daily life. Past research on this technology has often focused on specific risks, such as digital stalking or a loss of trust in romantic relationships. Other studies have examined how parents use these applications to monitor their adolescent children.

    Yet little data exists regarding the broader social networks of location sharing. Researchers wanted to understand the full scope of who receives this access and the specific motivations driving these digital disclosures. Brian G. Ogolsky, a researcher at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and his colleagues sought to categorize the everyday habits of smartphone users. They grounded their work in communication privacy management theory, which suggests that people constantly negotiate the boundaries between personal privacy and social disclosure.

    By treating geographic coordinates as a form of private information, the researchers aimed to map the changing norms of digital intimacy. Traditionally, social scientists have viewed privacy management as an active choice, where a person decides to reveal specific details in a specific moment. Smartphone tracking, however, creates a continuous and ambient stream of data. The research team wanted to know how people navigate this distinct type of constant revelation.

    To gather the data, Ogolsky and his team recruited 203 adults between the ages of 19 and 59. The participants were required to own a smartphone and currently share their location with at least one person. During an online survey, participants opened their tracking applications and counted the total number of people who could see their movements. They then categorized their relationships with each person on the list.

    Participants also answered open-ended questions detailing why they initially allowed access and why they continued to do so over time. The research team manually categorized the written responses, coding them into dozens of specific themes before collapsing them into four primary categories. This qualitative approach allowed the researchers to preserve the respondents’ own descriptions of their social behaviors.

    The survey revealed that participants broadcast their location to an average of nearly four people. However, the majority of the respondents shared their whereabouts with just one or two individuals, indicating that people maintain tight privacy boundaries even with ambient technology. Romantic partners were the most common recipients of this information, selected by over 62 percent of the respondents. Friends and siblings were the next most common categories, followed by mothers, fathers, and children.

    When analyzing the motivations for broadcasting physical movements, the researchers identified safety as the most frequently cited reason across the entire survey. Participants described using the technology to gain peace of mind and to ensure they could receive help in an emergency. They also mentioned safety in the context of developmental transitions, such as tracking a teenager who recently started driving or monitoring an aging parent who might face cognitive decline. The researchers noted that this type of safety is entirely passive, as it relies on the other person choosing to check the application when assistance is needed.

    The second major category of motivation was practicality. People used location data to navigate the logistics of daily life, such as checking if a partner had left work or timing a dinner preparation. This allowed them to stay informed without needing to send a text message or make a phone call to ask for an estimated time of arrival. In this specific group of participants, staying informed of a partner’s movements was usually described as an issue of efficiency rather than an attempt to exert control.

    A third category involved casual reasons for keeping tracking features active. Many participants cited sheer indifference, noting that they had forgotten the application was running or simply had no reason to turn it off. Some tracking applications enable location sharing by default, meaning users might accidentally broadcast their data continuously. Other respondents described using the technology purely for entertainment, with one participant noting that they “find it funny to check each other’s location and send texts about it.”

    The final category involved relationship processes. In these instances, participants viewed the act of revealing their location as a way to maintain closeness or build trust. Some individuals used the continuous stream of geographic data to demonstrate transparency in a romantic partnership, offering explanations such as, “Because I’m fine with it. I have nothing to hide.” A small number of respondents reported sharing their location due to direct pressure from a partner or a cultural expectation that roommates should automatically know each other’s whereabouts.

    The researchers then compared the reasons for sharing against the specific types of relationships. The motivations shifted depending on the person receiving the data. For romantic partners and friends, practical reasons dominated the decision to keep tracking applications active. These individuals likely spend a large portion of their time together and need efficient ways to coordinate shared schedules.

    By contrast, safety was the primary driver for giving access to family members. Parents, children, and extended family members were granted access primarily to alleviate worries about physical well-being. Because adult children often live far away from their aging parents or extended family, location tracking provides a way to maintain a sense of connection and security across long physical distances.

    The study relied on a specific demographic sample that was largely white, heterosexual, and highly educated. Because all participants already used tracking software, the results do not capture the perspectives of people who actively avoid the technology due to privacy concerns. The researchers also did not directly ask participants about intimate partner violence. This omission might have resulted in an underreporting of digital surveillance, controlling behaviors, or a lack of trust.

    Future research will need to explore how digital boundaries change as tracking algorithms become more deeply integrated into daily life. Scientists also hope to investigate whether relying on passive digital tracking replaces traditional conversations, and how skipping basic logistical check-ins might alter interpersonal communication.

    The study, “Near, Far, Wherever You Are: With Whom and Why Do People Use Location Sharing in Relationships,” was authored by Brian G. Ogolsky, Matthew Rivas-Koehl, Evaline Y. Li, Ghada Kawas, Emily J. Charvat, Christopher R. Maniotes and Jennifer L. Hardesty.

    URL: psypost.org/why-people-share-t

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #LocationSharing #DigitalPrivacy #FindMy #Life360 #SmartphoneTracking #RelationshipDynamics #SafetyFirst #PracticalTracking #PrivacyManagement #AmbientDisclosure

  6. DATE: August 28, 2026 at 06:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: The psychology of why people share their smartphone location data with friends and family

    URL: psypost.org/why-people-share-t

    People frequently track the real-time geographic movements of their close friends and family members through smartphone applications. A new survey of adults reveals that users most often share their whereabouts with romantic partners to manage practical logistics, while relying on the technology to monitor the physical safety of their parents and siblings. The findings were published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

    Modern smartphones come equipped with a variety of tools that allow users to continuously broadcast their exact physical location to others. Features like Apple’s Find My, Google Maps, and dedicated tracking programs such as Life360 are increasingly common fixtures in daily life. Past research on this technology has often focused on specific risks, such as digital stalking or a loss of trust in romantic relationships. Other studies have examined how parents use these applications to monitor their adolescent children.

    Yet little data exists regarding the broader social networks of location sharing. Researchers wanted to understand the full scope of who receives this access and the specific motivations driving these digital disclosures. Brian G. Ogolsky, a researcher at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and his colleagues sought to categorize the everyday habits of smartphone users. They grounded their work in communication privacy management theory, which suggests that people constantly negotiate the boundaries between personal privacy and social disclosure.

    By treating geographic coordinates as a form of private information, the researchers aimed to map the changing norms of digital intimacy. Traditionally, social scientists have viewed privacy management as an active choice, where a person decides to reveal specific details in a specific moment. Smartphone tracking, however, creates a continuous and ambient stream of data. The research team wanted to know how people navigate this distinct type of constant revelation.

    To gather the data, Ogolsky and his team recruited 203 adults between the ages of 19 and 59. The participants were required to own a smartphone and currently share their location with at least one person. During an online survey, participants opened their tracking applications and counted the total number of people who could see their movements. They then categorized their relationships with each person on the list.

    Participants also answered open-ended questions detailing why they initially allowed access and why they continued to do so over time. The research team manually categorized the written responses, coding them into dozens of specific themes before collapsing them into four primary categories. This qualitative approach allowed the researchers to preserve the respondents’ own descriptions of their social behaviors.

    The survey revealed that participants broadcast their location to an average of nearly four people. However, the majority of the respondents shared their whereabouts with just one or two individuals, indicating that people maintain tight privacy boundaries even with ambient technology. Romantic partners were the most common recipients of this information, selected by over 62 percent of the respondents. Friends and siblings were the next most common categories, followed by mothers, fathers, and children.

    When analyzing the motivations for broadcasting physical movements, the researchers identified safety as the most frequently cited reason across the entire survey. Participants described using the technology to gain peace of mind and to ensure they could receive help in an emergency. They also mentioned safety in the context of developmental transitions, such as tracking a teenager who recently started driving or monitoring an aging parent who might face cognitive decline. The researchers noted that this type of safety is entirely passive, as it relies on the other person choosing to check the application when assistance is needed.

    The second major category of motivation was practicality. People used location data to navigate the logistics of daily life, such as checking if a partner had left work or timing a dinner preparation. This allowed them to stay informed without needing to send a text message or make a phone call to ask for an estimated time of arrival. In this specific group of participants, staying informed of a partner’s movements was usually described as an issue of efficiency rather than an attempt to exert control.

    A third category involved casual reasons for keeping tracking features active. Many participants cited sheer indifference, noting that they had forgotten the application was running or simply had no reason to turn it off. Some tracking applications enable location sharing by default, meaning users might accidentally broadcast their data continuously. Other respondents described using the technology purely for entertainment, with one participant noting that they “find it funny to check each other’s location and send texts about it.”

    The final category involved relationship processes. In these instances, participants viewed the act of revealing their location as a way to maintain closeness or build trust. Some individuals used the continuous stream of geographic data to demonstrate transparency in a romantic partnership, offering explanations such as, “Because I’m fine with it. I have nothing to hide.” A small number of respondents reported sharing their location due to direct pressure from a partner or a cultural expectation that roommates should automatically know each other’s whereabouts.

    The researchers then compared the reasons for sharing against the specific types of relationships. The motivations shifted depending on the person receiving the data. For romantic partners and friends, practical reasons dominated the decision to keep tracking applications active. These individuals likely spend a large portion of their time together and need efficient ways to coordinate shared schedules.

    By contrast, safety was the primary driver for giving access to family members. Parents, children, and extended family members were granted access primarily to alleviate worries about physical well-being. Because adult children often live far away from their aging parents or extended family, location tracking provides a way to maintain a sense of connection and security across long physical distances.

    The study relied on a specific demographic sample that was largely white, heterosexual, and highly educated. Because all participants already used tracking software, the results do not capture the perspectives of people who actively avoid the technology due to privacy concerns. The researchers also did not directly ask participants about intimate partner violence. This omission might have resulted in an underreporting of digital surveillance, controlling behaviors, or a lack of trust.

    Future research will need to explore how digital boundaries change as tracking algorithms become more deeply integrated into daily life. Scientists also hope to investigate whether relying on passive digital tracking replaces traditional conversations, and how skipping basic logistical check-ins might alter interpersonal communication.

    The study, “Near, Far, Wherever You Are: With Whom and Why Do People Use Location Sharing in Relationships,” was authored by Brian G. Ogolsky, Matthew Rivas-Koehl, Evaline Y. Li, Ghada Kawas, Emily J. Charvat, Christopher R. Maniotes and Jennifer L. Hardesty.

    URL: psypost.org/why-people-share-t

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #LocationSharing #DigitalPrivacy #FindMy #Life360 #SmartphoneTracking #RelationshipDynamics #SafetyFirst #PracticalTracking #PrivacyManagement #AmbientDisclosure

  7. @signalapp @AboutSignalNL

    I just discovered that when you want to share your location using the Signal's 'share your location' feature, it sends a link of..... Google Maps 🥴

    I could not find a way to change this to an (open standard) geolocation link.

    - did I overlook a setting?
    If not:
    - why is Signal revealing it's user location to Google?
    - why would Signal promote Google Maps?

    #privacy #locationsharing

  8. @signalapp @AboutSignalNL

    I just discovered that when you want to share your location using the Signal's 'share your location' feature, it sends a link of..... Google Maps 🥴

    I could not find a way to change this to an (open standard) geolocation link.

    - did I overlook a setting?
    If not:
    - why is Signal revealing it's user location to Google?
    - why would Signal promote Google Maps?

    #privacy #locationsharing

  9. @signalapp @AboutSignalNL

    I just discovered that when you want to share your location using the Signal's 'share your location' feature, it sends a link of..... Google Maps 🥴

    I could not find a way to change this to an (open standard) geolocation link.

    - did I overlook a setting?
    If not:
    - why is Signal revealing it's user location to Google?
    - why would Signal promote Google Maps?

    #privacy #locationsharing

  10. @signalapp @AboutSignalNL

    I just discovered that when you want to share your location using the Signal's 'share your location' feature, it sends a link of..... Google Maps 🥴

    I could not find a way to change this to an (open standard) geolocation link.

    - did I overlook a setting?
    If not:
    - why is Signal revealing it's user location to Google?
    - why would Signal promote Google Maps?

    #privacy #locationsharing

  11. @signalapp @AboutSignalNL

    I just discovered that when you want to share your location using the Signal's 'share your location' feature, it sends a link of..... Google Maps 🥴

    I could not find a way to change this to an (open standard) geolocation link.

    - did I overlook a setting?
    If not:
    - why is Signal revealing it's user location to Google?
    - why would Signal promote Google Maps?

    #privacy #locationsharing

  12. FYI: Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #WebSecurity

  13. FYI: Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #WebSecurity

  14. FYI: Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #WebSecurity

  15. FYI: Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #WebSecurity

  16. ICYMI: Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #Websites

  17. ICYMI: Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #Websites

  18. ICYMI: Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #Websites

  19. ICYMI: Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #Websites

  20. Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #Websites

  21. Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #Websites

  22. Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #Websites

  23. Chrome on Android now lets users share approximate location with websites: Chrome for Android adds approximate location sharing, giving users a middle-ground privacy option between full location access and denial for website requests. ppc.land/chrome-on-android-now #Chrome #Android #Privacy #LocationSharing #Websites

  24. FYI: ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPSTechnology

  25. FYI: ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPSTechnology

  26. FYI: ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPSTechnology

  27. ICYMI: ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPSData

  28. ICYMI: ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPSData

  29. ICYMI: ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPSData

  30. ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPS

  31. ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPS

  32. ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPS

  33. ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPS

  34. ChatGPT quietly rolled out location sharing - and local search may never be the same: ChatGPT's March 26 location sharing update lets users share device GPS data for local recommendations, news, and weather - putting OpenAI directly in Google's local search territory. ppc.land/chatgpt-quietly-rolle #ChatGPT #LocationSharing #LocalSearch #OpenAI #GPS

  35. Mới ra mắt: LocShare - ứng dụng web mã nguồn mở chia sẻ vị trí trực tiếp trên trình duyệt theo thời gian thực! 🌍
    🔹 Không cần tài khoản/cơ sở dữ liệu
    🔹 Chỉ cần username & mã nhóm
    🔹 Hỗ trợ chỉ đường qua Apple/Google Maps/Waze
    🔹 Tối ưu di động (PWA)

    #LocationSharing #ChiaSeViTri #OpenSource #MãNguồnMở #WebApp #RealTime #Maps #Privacy #QuyenRiengTu

    reddit.com/r/SideProject/comme

  36. **Chia sẻ vị trí dễ dàng với Mark My Spots!**
    Không cần tài khoản, chỉ cần tạo bản đồ, thêm đánh dấu và chia sẻ URL ngay lập tức. Bạn có thể kiểm soát chỉnh sửa bằng "Map Key" (mật khẩu). Thêm điểm bằng cách tìm kiếm, click bản đồ hoặc double-click! Thử bản đồ ví dụ tại [markmyspots.xyz/example](https://markmyspots.xyz/example) (không cần đăng nhập).

    #Côngnghệ #Tiệních #Mạngxãhội #LocationSharing #AppMới

    reddit.com/r/SideProject/comme

  37. Một lập trình viên đã phát triển ứng dụng Noqta, giải quyết vấn đề địa chỉ không chuẩn hóa ở Lebanon. Noqta cho phép chia sẻ vị trí chi tiết (GPS, mô tả, ghi âm, ảnh) qua một link duy nhất, giúp việc giao hàng và tìm đường trở nên dễ dàng hơn. Người nhận không cần cài app.

    #Noqta #LocationSharing #TechForGood #Lebanon #CongNghe #ChiaSeViTri #GiaoHang

    reddit.com/r/SideProject/comme

  38. @itsfoss Guys checkout my app!! No signups, no accounts, no servers for realtime location sharing app, everything is built on P2P technology

    apple.co/4peNUmr

    #ios #wherefam #maps #locationsharing #privacy

  39. Well folks found my app on top category for CA!! Achievement made lmao just released it today… though idk how this ranking works.

    WhereFam -> Privacy focused location sharing app without collecting any location data, no sign ups or phone numbers or servers!! Utilizing our phones potential to the max using P2P technology, no backend zero costs forever.

    wherefam.com

    #ios #shipaton #apple #swift #p2p #locationsharing #privacy

  40. Well folks!! It was launch day, finally made it to app store. Its been a long journey to get this out...

    WhereFam - Location sharing app, with focus on privacy requiring no signups, or phone numbers, no servers in between rather direct connections

    The best part is location data is only shared with trusted members only, so I don't need to maintain anything on my end.

    apps.apple.com/app/wherefam/id

    #ios #locationsharing #app #apple

  41. What to Know About #Instagram Map, #LocationSharing and #Privacy Concerns

    The service rolled out this week, prompting confusion and safety concerns. #Meta , which owns Instagram, said the feature was turned off unless users activated it.
    #privacy #security #geoloc

    nytimes.com/2025/08/09/us/inst

  42. What to Know About #Instagram Map, #LocationSharing and #Privacy Concerns

    The service rolled out this week, prompting confusion and safety concerns. #Meta , which owns Instagram, said the feature was turned off unless users activated it.
    #privacy #security #geoloc

    nytimes.com/2025/08/09/us/inst

  43. What to Know About #Instagram Map, #LocationSharing and #Privacy Concerns

    The service rolled out this week, prompting confusion and safety concerns. #Meta , which owns Instagram, said the feature was turned off unless users activated it.
    #privacy #security #geoloc

    nytimes.com/2025/08/09/us/inst

  44. What to Know About Map, and Concerns

    The service rolled out this week, prompting confusion and safety concerns. , which owns Instagram, said the feature was turned off unless users activated it.

    nytimes.com/2025/08/09/us/inst