#lettertoeditor — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #lettertoeditor, aggregated by home.social.
-
A classic #LetterToEditor:
"We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."
Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation. -
A classic #LetterToEditor:
"We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."
Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation. -
A classic #LetterToEditor:
"We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."
Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation. -
A classic #LetterToEditor:
"We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."
Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation. -
A classic #LetterToEditor:
"We want to congratulate our colleagues on this impressive work that is a true #TourDeForce. Also, we think it's entirely flawed & should be retracted."
Then lists reasons A, B, and C to #retract, where:
A - is clearly accommodated in the study design;
B - relies on critics misunderstanding a meaning of one word as being the exact opposite of what it is; &
C - has no discernible impact on conclusions & is listed as a limitation.