home.social

#lawsky — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #lawsky, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Can any of my #lawsky acquaintances shed any light on what, if any exceptions to HIPAA law Beshear could possibly use to demand access to McConnell's health info?

  2. brb need to take my client to SW Yellowstone for a bit #lawsky

  3. brb need to take my client to SW Yellowstone for a bit #lawsky

  4. brb need to take my client to SW Yellowstone for a bit #lawsky

  5. brb need to take my client to SW Yellowstone for a bit #lawsky

  6. #LegalEthics Tidbit: Is my new firm disqualified just because my old firm didn’t turn off my cloud storage access?

    A CA lawyer at Firm A got a new client who was plaintiff in a civil suit. The lawyer billed the plaintiff less than an hour before the plaintiff got new counsel. The lawyer then left Firm A to join Firm B, which represented defendant in the same case. After leaving Firm A, the lawyer still had access to the plaintiff’s files ... (cont.)

    courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/
    #law #lawsky

  7. #LegalEthics Tidbit: Is my new firm disqualified just because my old firm didn’t turn off my cloud storage access?

    A CA lawyer at Firm A got a new client who was plaintiff in a civil suit. The lawyer billed the plaintiff less than an hour before the plaintiff got new counsel. The lawyer then left Firm A to join Firm B, which represented defendant in the same case. After leaving Firm A, the lawyer still had access to the plaintiff’s files ... (cont.)

    courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/
    #law #lawsky

  8. #LegalEthics Tidbit: Is my new firm disqualified just because my old firm didn’t turn off my cloud storage access?

    A CA lawyer at Firm A got a new client who was plaintiff in a civil suit. The lawyer billed the plaintiff less than an hour before the plaintiff got new counsel. The lawyer then left Firm A to join Firm B, which represented defendant in the same case. After leaving Firm A, the lawyer still had access to the plaintiff’s files ... (cont.)

    courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/
    #law #lawsky

  9. #LegalEthics Tidbit: Is my new firm disqualified just because my old firm didn’t turn off my cloud storage access?

    A CA lawyer at Firm A got a new client who was plaintiff in a civil suit. The lawyer billed the plaintiff less than an hour before the plaintiff got new counsel. The lawyer then left Firm A to join Firm B, which represented defendant in the same case. After leaving Firm A, the lawyer still had access to the plaintiff’s files ... (cont.)

    courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/
    #law #lawsky

  10. #LegalEthics Tidbit: Is my new firm disqualified just because my old firm didn’t turn off my cloud storage access?

    A CA lawyer at Firm A got a new client who was plaintiff in a civil suit. The lawyer billed the plaintiff less than an hour before the plaintiff got new counsel. The lawyer then left Firm A to join Firm B, which represented defendant in the same case. After leaving Firm A, the lawyer still had access to the plaintiff’s files ... (cont.)

    courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/
    #law #lawsky

  11. Dopey question for #LawSky, what's keeping the ICC from prosecuting probable crimes now?

  12. Dopey question for #LawSky, what's keeping the ICC from prosecuting probable crimes now?

  13. Hey #lawsky: you may find this useful as a pre-filing check to run on your PDFs: github.com/lizthegrey/p...

    CC0, without warranty, etc.

    GitHub - lizthegrey/pdf-commen...

  14. Hey #lawsky: you may find this useful as a pre-filing check to run on your PDFs: github.com/lizthegrey/p...

    CC0, without warranty, etc.

    GitHub - lizthegrey/pdf-commen...

  15. Hey #lawsky: you may find this useful as a pre-filing check to run on your PDFs: github.com/lizthegrey/p...

    CC0, without warranty, etc.

    GitHub - lizthegrey/pdf-commen...

  16. Hey #lawsky: you may find this useful as a pre-filing check to run on your PDFs: github.com/lizthegrey/p...

    CC0, without warranty, etc.

    GitHub - lizthegrey/pdf-commen...

  17. I'm just imagining some new junior associate reading this and going "that's genius I'm gonna do that" ...

    It's gonna be hilarious. #lawsky

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:yvbszlkc7d75ixkid5g2zmw7/post/3mpdns4mdm22h

  18. I'm just imagining some new junior associate reading this and going "that's genius I'm gonna do that" ...

    It's gonna be hilarious. #lawsky

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:yvbszlkc7d75ixkid5g2zmw7/post/3mpdns4mdm22h

  19. I'm just imagining some new junior associate reading this and going "that's genius I'm gonna do that" ...

    It's gonna be hilarious. #lawsky

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:yvbszlkc7d75ixkid5g2zmw7/post/3mpdns4mdm22h

  20. I'm just imagining some new junior associate reading this and going "that's genius I'm gonna do that" ...

    It's gonna be hilarious. #lawsky

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:yvbszlkc7d75ixkid5g2zmw7/post/3mpdns4mdm22h

  21. I'm just imagining some new junior associate reading this and going "that's genius I'm gonna do that" ...

    It's gonna be hilarious. #lawsky

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:yvbszlkc7d75ixkid5g2zmw7/post/3mpdns4mdm22h

  22. Hey #LawSky friends: Is this normal practice in the 11th Circuit? Or do we think they were waiting to see what happened in the 7th Circuit?

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3mofwlortns2h

  23. Hey #LawSky friends: Is this normal practice in the 11th Circuit? Or do we think they were waiting to see what happened in the 7th Circuit?

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3mofwlortns2h

  24. Hey #LawSky friends: Is this normal practice in the 11th Circuit? Or do we think they were waiting to see what happened in the 7th Circuit?

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3mofwlortns2h

  25. Hey #LawSky friends: Is this normal practice in the 11th Circuit? Or do we think they were waiting to see what happened in the 7th Circuit?

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3mofwlortns2h

  26. Hey #LawSky friends: Is this normal practice in the 11th Circuit? Or do we think they were waiting to see what happened in the 7th Circuit?

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3mofwlortns2h

  27. #LegalEthics Tidbit: If the court’s pro hac vice form is asking questions I don’t want to answer, can I just create my own form?

    A LA lawyer with w lengthy disciplinary history sought pro hac vice admission in the Northern District of Illinois. The court’s website had a form motion that asked whether the lawyer had ever been sanctioned or suspended, and whether the lawyer was currently the subject of a disciplinary investigation. The ... (cont.)

    ladb.org/handler.document.aspx
    #law #lawsky

  28. #LegalEthics Tidbit: If the court’s pro hac vice form is asking questions I don’t want to answer, can I just create my own form?

    A LA lawyer with w lengthy disciplinary history sought pro hac vice admission in the Northern District of Illinois. The court’s website had a form motion that asked whether the lawyer had ever been sanctioned or suspended, and whether the lawyer was currently the subject of a disciplinary investigation. The ... (cont.)

    ladb.org/handler.document.aspx
    #law #lawsky

  29. #LegalEthics Tidbit: If the court’s pro hac vice form is asking questions I don’t want to answer, can I just create my own form?

    A LA lawyer with w lengthy disciplinary history sought pro hac vice admission in the Northern District of Illinois. The court’s website had a form motion that asked whether the lawyer had ever been sanctioned or suspended, and whether the lawyer was currently the subject of a disciplinary investigation. The ... (cont.)

    ladb.org/handler.document.aspx
    #law #lawsky

  30. #LegalEthics Tidbit: If the court’s pro hac vice form is asking questions I don’t want to answer, can I just create my own form?

    A LA lawyer with w lengthy disciplinary history sought pro hac vice admission in the Northern District of Illinois. The court’s website had a form motion that asked whether the lawyer had ever been sanctioned or suspended, and whether the lawyer was currently the subject of a disciplinary investigation. The ... (cont.)

    ladb.org/handler.document.aspx
    #law #lawsky

  31. #LegalEthics Tidbit: If the court’s pro hac vice form is asking questions I don’t want to answer, can I just create my own form?

    A LA lawyer with w lengthy disciplinary history sought pro hac vice admission in the Northern District of Illinois. The court’s website had a form motion that asked whether the lawyer had ever been sanctioned or suspended, and whether the lawyer was currently the subject of a disciplinary investigation. The ... (cont.)

    ladb.org/handler.document.aspx
    #law #lawsky

  32. I'm not any kind of lawyer, and know enough to be dangerous, so I may be wrong...but, if Bondi wasn't under oath, couldn't she have just straight lied about conversations with Trump instead of refusing to answer? Seems like refusing brings WAY more attention 🤔 #SheShed #Lawsky

  33. Hey #lawsky quick survey have you ever complained to a federal judge about something opposing counsel did and confidently asserted they should've done something you just made up and then admitted you didn't actually know what they did or how you were supposed to respond?

  34. Hey #lawsky quick survey have you ever complained to a federal judge about something opposing counsel did and confidently asserted they should've done something you just made up and then admitted you didn't actually know what they did or how you were supposed to respond?

  35. Hey #lawsky quick survey have you ever complained to a federal judge about something opposing counsel did and confidently asserted they should've done something you just made up and then admitted you didn't actually know what they did or how you were supposed to respond?

  36. Hey #lawsky quick survey have you ever complained to a federal judge about something opposing counsel did and confidently asserted they should've done something you just made up and then admitted you didn't actually know what they did or how you were supposed to respond?