#laws10218 — Public Fediverse posts

So, I gave it just 1 element:

Analyse the following statement of guilt from Biljana Plavsic in terms of gender [full statement given]

Even with the full text and a direct prompt, it still falls well short.

So - complex assessment briefs with multiple elements requiring original thinking and the shift from knowledge to application seem safe... for now.

#ChatGPT #Criminology #AI #ICTY #LAWS10218 #Gender #BiH #AcademicMisconduct

So, I gave it just 1 element:

Analyse the following statement of guilt from Biljana Plavsic in terms of gender [full statement given]

Even with the full text and a direct prompt, it still falls well short.

So - complex assessment briefs with multiple elements requiring original thinking and the shift from knowledge to application seem safe... for now.

#ChatGPT #Criminology #AI #ICTY #LAWS10218 #Gender #BiH #AcademicMisconduct

So, I gave it just 1 element:

Analyse the following statement of guilt from Biljana Plavsic in terms of gender [full statement given]

Even with the full text and a direct prompt, it still falls well short.

So - complex assessment briefs with multiple elements requiring original thinking and the shift from knowledge to application seem safe... for now.

#ChatGPT #Criminology #AI #ICTY #LAWS10218 #Gender #BiH #AcademicMisconduct

So, I gave it just 1 element:

Analyse the following statement of guilt from Biljana Plavsic in terms of gender [full statement given]

Even with the full text and a direct prompt, it still falls well short.

So - complex assessment briefs with multiple elements requiring original thinking and the shift from knowledge to application seem safe... for now.

#ChatGPT #Criminology #AI #ICTY #LAWS10218 #Gender #BiH #AcademicMisconduct

I joined the crowds playing with ChatGPT

I task students on #LAWS10218 Criminologies of Atrocity with a brief to do criminological research on atrocity using ICTY testimony as data.

With the brief (or a simplified version) ChatGPT gets so far in raising a question, and even identifying a relevant case, but then hits limitations.

The review of literature was shallow. The required analysis non existent. The one 'reference' untraceable.

(1/2)

#ChatGPT #Criminology

I joined the crowds playing with ChatGPT

I task students on #LAWS10218 Criminologies of Atrocity with a brief to do criminological research on atrocity using ICTY testimony as data.

With the brief (or a simplified version) ChatGPT gets so far in raising a question, and even identifying a relevant case, but then hits limitations.

The review of literature was shallow. The required analysis non existent. The one 'reference' untraceable.

(1/2)

#ChatGPT #Criminology

I joined the crowds playing with ChatGPT

I task students on #LAWS10218 Criminologies of Atrocity with a brief to do criminological research on atrocity using ICTY testimony as data.

With the brief (or a simplified version) ChatGPT gets so far in raising a question, and even identifying a relevant case, but then hits limitations.

The review of literature was shallow. The required analysis non existent. The one 'reference' untraceable.

(1/2)

#ChatGPT #Criminology

I joined the crowds playing with ChatGPT

I task students on #LAWS10218 Criminologies of Atrocity with a brief to do criminological research on atrocity using ICTY testimony as data.

With the brief (or a simplified version) ChatGPT gets so far in raising a question, and even identifying a relevant case, but then hits limitations.

The review of literature was shallow. The required analysis non existent. The one 'reference' untraceable.

(1/2)

#ChatGPT #Criminology