#jonstewartforpresident — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #jonstewartforpresident, aggregated by home.social.
-
Yeah, free shot in the shooting tent...
…until you remember that Nelson Mandela and Václav Havel both were convicted felons.
As dangerous as it is (see Germany 100 years ago), it is best to let the voters be the judge of character and agenda.
The best cure for that risk, is to run an obviously much better candidate which is what DNC should focus on.
-
@indigenous_commentator No shit. I would vote for John Stewart.
-
Just putting this out there. I would REALLY like it if Jon Stewart were president.
-
@StillIRise1963 @edsuom I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@StillIRise1963 @edsuom I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@StillIRise1963 @edsuom I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@StillIRise1963 @edsuom I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@StillIRise1963 @edsuom I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@RichStein @alexwild I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@RichStein @alexwild I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@RichStein @alexwild I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@RichStein @alexwild I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@RichStein @alexwild I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
I’ve often thought that America needs a third party to balance out the extremophiles in this extant duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies.
A “White Party”, an analogue to the “Rainbow Nation”, where the core principles are strictly: UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international rule-of-law, and truth-seeking as witnesses before God.
-
@Lowie I’m unclear on what the term “false equivalency” means to you. Similarly, I’m not sure what you mean by “equal”.
I’ll elaborate on my opinion if you would do me the kindness of briefly defining your operational terms or pointing me to a definition that you agree with.
In the meantime, do I see both parties as flip sides of the same problematic coin? Yes, I do. 🥶
-
@Lowie I’m unclear on what the term “false equivalency” means to you. Similarly, I’m not sure what you mean by “equal”.
I’ll elaborate on my opinion if you would do me the kindness of briefly defining your operational terms or pointing me to a definition that you agree with.
In the meantime, do I see both parties as flip sides of the same problematic coin? Yes, I do. 🥶
-
@Lowie I’m unclear on what the term “false equivalency” means to you. Similarly, I’m not sure what you mean by “equal”.
I’ll elaborate on my opinion if you would do me the kindness of briefly defining your operational terms or pointing me to a definition that you agree with.
In the meantime, do I see both parties as flip sides of the same problematic coin? Yes, I do. 🥶
-
@Lowie I’m not a fan of a duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies, myself, but that is what the two-party system has given us.
#voteyourconscience not your fears
-
@Lowie I’m not a fan of a duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies, myself, but that is what the two-party system has given us.
#voteyourconscience not your fears
-
@Lowie I’m not a fan of a duopoly of aristocratic ochlocracies, myself, but that is what the two-party system has given us.
#voteyourconscience not your fears
-
@Lowie for the scifi fans out there 🖖
#starwars “this is the way”: #UNUDHR
#startrek “Federation” = #UN, “Prime Directive” = #UDHR
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
established 1948
ignored until 2023 (75 year anniversary…)
-
@Lowie for the scifi fans out there 🖖
#starwars “this is the way”: #UNUDHR
#startrek “Federation” = #UN, “Prime Directive” = #UDHR
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
established 1948
ignored until 2023 (75 year anniversary…)
-
@Lowie for the scifi fans out there 🖖
#starwars “this is the way”: #UNUDHR
#startrek “Federation” = #UN, “Prime Directive” = #UDHR
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
established 1948
ignored until 2023 (75 year anniversary…)