home.social

#jobguarantee — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #jobguarantee, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Lock down a future-proof career! 🔐 Industrial sectors need expert protection, and we’re here to train you. Join the OT Cybersecurity Training program by The Evolve Edge and walk straight into a guaranteed job!

    📧 [email protected]
    🌐 www.theevolvedge.com
    📞 +91 9871191929 / +91 9311805027

    #OTCybersecurity #IndustrialSecurity #SCADASecurity #ICSSecurity #CybersecurityTraining #JobGuarantee #100Placement #CareerInCybersecurity #TheEvolveEdge #TechTraining #CyberSecurityJobs #InfoSec

  2. Lock down a future-proof career! 🔐 Industrial sectors need expert protection, and we’re here to train you. Join the OT Cybersecurity Training program by The Evolve Edge and walk straight into a guaranteed job!

    📧 [email protected]
    🌐 www.theevolvedge.com
    📞 +91 9871191929 / +91 9311805027

    #OTCybersecurity #IndustrialSecurity #SCADASecurity #ICSSecurity #CybersecurityTraining #JobGuarantee #100Placement #CareerInCybersecurity #TheEvolveEdge #TechTraining #CyberSecurityJobs #InfoSec

  3. Eine sinnvolle Alternative wäre eine staatliche Job-Garantie für alle unfreiwillig arbeitslosen, wie sie die Vertreter der MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) fordern.
    Finanziert sich praktisch von selbst über die Steigerung der Binnennachfrage, die gerade am Boden liegt - es sei denn, man lässt scheunentorgroße Steuerschlupflöcher offen.

    Man muss allerdings nicht lange nachdenken, um drauf zu kommen, wer sich dagegen aussprechen würde: Arbeitgeber könnten nicht mehr mit Arbeitslosigkeit drohen, um Löhne niedrig zu halten.

    fr.de/wirtschaft/arbeitspflich

    #MMT #JobGuarantee #Unemployment

  4. Eine sinnvolle Alternative wäre eine staatliche Job-Garantie für alle unfreiwillig arbeitslosen, wie sie die Vertreter der MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) fordern.
    Finanziert sich praktisch von selbst über die Steigerung der Binnennachfrage, die gerade am Boden liegt - es sei denn, man lässt scheunentorgroße Steuerschlupflöcher offen.

    Man muss allerdings nicht lange nachdenken, um drauf zu kommen, wer sich dagegen aussprechen würde: Arbeitgeber könnten nicht mehr mit Arbeitslosigkeit drohen, um Löhne niedrig zu halten.

    fr.de/wirtschaft/arbeitspflich

    #MMT #JobGuarantee #Unemployment

  5. Eine sinnvolle Alternative wäre eine staatliche Job-Garantie für alle unfreiwillig arbeitslosen, wie sie die Vertreter der MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) fordern.
    Finanziert sich praktisch von selbst über die Steigerung der Binnennachfrage, die gerade am Boden liegt - es sei denn, man lässt scheunentorgroße Steuerschlupflöcher offen.

    Man muss allerdings nicht lange nachdenken, um drauf zu kommen, wer sich dagegen aussprechen würde: Arbeitgeber könnten nicht mehr mit Arbeitslosigkeit drohen, um Löhne niedrig zu halten.

    fr.de/wirtschaft/arbeitspflich

    #MMT #JobGuarantee #Unemployment

  6. Eine sinnvolle Alternative wäre eine staatliche Job-Garantie für alle unfreiwillig arbeitslosen, wie sie die Vertreter der MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) fordern.
    Finanziert sich praktisch von selbst über die Steigerung der Binnennachfrage, die gerade am Boden liegt - es sei denn, man lässt scheunentorgroße Steuerschlupflöcher offen.

    Man muss allerdings nicht lange nachdenken, um drauf zu kommen, wer sich dagegen aussprechen würde: Arbeitgeber könnten nicht mehr mit Arbeitslosigkeit drohen, um Löhne niedrig zu halten.

    fr.de/wirtschaft/arbeitspflich

    #MMT #JobGuarantee #Unemployment

  7. Eine sinnvolle Alternative wäre eine staatliche Job-Garantie für alle unfreiwillig arbeitslosen, wie sie die Vertreter der MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) fordern.
    Finanziert sich praktisch von selbst über die Steigerung der Binnennachfrage, die gerade am Boden liegt - es sei denn, man lässt scheunentorgroße Steuerschlupflöcher offen.

    Man muss allerdings nicht lange nachdenken, um drauf zu kommen, wer sich dagegen aussprechen würde: Arbeitgeber könnten nicht mehr mit Arbeitslosigkeit drohen, um Löhne niedrig zu halten.

    fr.de/wirtschaft/arbeitspflich

    #MMT #JobGuarantee #Unemployment

  8. Karnataka to Challenge New Employment Act in Court

    Karnataka government says no to the new VB-G RAM G Act. They think it breaks rules and hurts states' rights. Other states also disagree.

    #Karnataka, #JobGuarantee, #NewLaw, #Federalism, #RuralEmployment

    newsletter.tf/karnataka-court-

  9. Karnataka to Challenge New Employment Act in Court

    Karnataka government says no to the new VB-G RAM G Act. They think it breaks rules and hurts states' rights. Other states also disagree.

    #Karnataka, #JobGuarantee, #NewLaw, #Federalism, #RuralEmployment

    newsletter.tf/karnataka-court-

  10. The Karnataka government has decided to take the new VB-G RAM G employment law to court. They believe the law is not fair to states and may weaken job guarantees for people. Other states like Punjab and Telangana also have concerns.

    #Karnataka, #JobGuarantee, #NewLaw, #Federalism, #RuralEmployment

    newsletter.tf/karnataka-court-

  11. The Karnataka government has decided to take the new VB-G RAM G employment law to court. They believe the law is not fair to states and may weaken job guarantees for people. Other states like Punjab and Telangana also have concerns.

    #Karnataka, #JobGuarantee, #NewLaw, #Federalism, #RuralEmployment

    newsletter.tf/karnataka-court-

  12. "This paper employs the concept of “enshittification”—the systematic degradation of a service or product in the pursuit of profit—as a powerful metaphor to analyze the decay of the US labor market in the postwar era. Situating this process within Hyman Minsky’s theory of capitalist development, it argues that the current phase of money manager capitalism has accelerated a pervasive “bait-and-switch” dynamic that has emerged since the 1970s. The “bait” was the postwar social contract, which promised but never guaranteed economic security through tight full employment and access to good jobs for all. The “switch” was the neoliberal policy shift that dismantled labor protections, weaponized unemployment (via the NAIRU doctrine), and fostered financialization, leading to stagnant wages, precarity, and household indebtedness. The “trap” is the worker’s inescapable dependency for survival on a job within a system that uses the threat of unemployment as a policy tool. The paper identifies the erosion of four key forces—competition, regulation, interoperability, and worker power, all of which held the tenuous postwar contract together—as the drivers of this enshittification. It concludes by articulating how the federal job guarantee proposal can act as a systemic circuit breaker capable of reverse reengineering the labor market. The job guarantee is not only an alternative to precarious employment and the NAIRU policy framework, but also a comprehensive de facto regulator that introduces much needed competition for labor by firms in the economy. The paper evaluates how the program can introduce countervailing forces to arrest the degradation of the labor market and establish a new standard for good jobs, thereby laying the foundation for a renewed social contract."

    levyinstitute.org/publications

    #Enshittification #Financialization #Economy #JobGuarantee #Capitalism #Unemployment #Neoliberalism

  13. "This paper employs the concept of “enshittification”—the systematic degradation of a service or product in the pursuit of profit—as a powerful metaphor to analyze the decay of the US labor market in the postwar era. Situating this process within Hyman Minsky’s theory of capitalist development, it argues that the current phase of money manager capitalism has accelerated a pervasive “bait-and-switch” dynamic that has emerged since the 1970s. The “bait” was the postwar social contract, which promised but never guaranteed economic security through tight full employment and access to good jobs for all. The “switch” was the neoliberal policy shift that dismantled labor protections, weaponized unemployment (via the NAIRU doctrine), and fostered financialization, leading to stagnant wages, precarity, and household indebtedness. The “trap” is the worker’s inescapable dependency for survival on a job within a system that uses the threat of unemployment as a policy tool. The paper identifies the erosion of four key forces—competition, regulation, interoperability, and worker power, all of which held the tenuous postwar contract together—as the drivers of this enshittification. It concludes by articulating how the federal job guarantee proposal can act as a systemic circuit breaker capable of reverse reengineering the labor market. The job guarantee is not only an alternative to precarious employment and the NAIRU policy framework, but also a comprehensive de facto regulator that introduces much needed competition for labor by firms in the economy. The paper evaluates how the program can introduce countervailing forces to arrest the degradation of the labor market and establish a new standard for good jobs, thereby laying the foundation for a renewed social contract."

    levyinstitute.org/publications

    #Enshittification #Financialization #Economy #JobGuarantee #Capitalism #Unemployment #Neoliberalism

  14. "This paper employs the concept of “enshittification”—the systematic degradation of a service or product in the pursuit of profit—as a powerful metaphor to analyze the decay of the US labor market in the postwar era. Situating this process within Hyman Minsky’s theory of capitalist development, it argues that the current phase of money manager capitalism has accelerated a pervasive “bait-and-switch” dynamic that has emerged since the 1970s. The “bait” was the postwar social contract, which promised but never guaranteed economic security through tight full employment and access to good jobs for all. The “switch” was the neoliberal policy shift that dismantled labor protections, weaponized unemployment (via the NAIRU doctrine), and fostered financialization, leading to stagnant wages, precarity, and household indebtedness. The “trap” is the worker’s inescapable dependency for survival on a job within a system that uses the threat of unemployment as a policy tool. The paper identifies the erosion of four key forces—competition, regulation, interoperability, and worker power, all of which held the tenuous postwar contract together—as the drivers of this enshittification. It concludes by articulating how the federal job guarantee proposal can act as a systemic circuit breaker capable of reverse reengineering the labor market. The job guarantee is not only an alternative to precarious employment and the NAIRU policy framework, but also a comprehensive de facto regulator that introduces much needed competition for labor by firms in the economy. The paper evaluates how the program can introduce countervailing forces to arrest the degradation of the labor market and establish a new standard for good jobs, thereby laying the foundation for a renewed social contract."

    levyinstitute.org/publications

    #Enshittification #Financialization #Economy #JobGuarantee #Capitalism #Unemployment #Neoliberalism

  15. "This paper employs the concept of “enshittification”—the systematic degradation of a service or product in the pursuit of profit—as a powerful metaphor to analyze the decay of the US labor market in the postwar era. Situating this process within Hyman Minsky’s theory of capitalist development, it argues that the current phase of money manager capitalism has accelerated a pervasive “bait-and-switch” dynamic that has emerged since the 1970s. The “bait” was the postwar social contract, which promised but never guaranteed economic security through tight full employment and access to good jobs for all. The “switch” was the neoliberal policy shift that dismantled labor protections, weaponized unemployment (via the NAIRU doctrine), and fostered financialization, leading to stagnant wages, precarity, and household indebtedness. The “trap” is the worker’s inescapable dependency for survival on a job within a system that uses the threat of unemployment as a policy tool. The paper identifies the erosion of four key forces—competition, regulation, interoperability, and worker power, all of which held the tenuous postwar contract together—as the drivers of this enshittification. It concludes by articulating how the federal job guarantee proposal can act as a systemic circuit breaker capable of reverse reengineering the labor market. The job guarantee is not only an alternative to precarious employment and the NAIRU policy framework, but also a comprehensive de facto regulator that introduces much needed competition for labor by firms in the economy. The paper evaluates how the program can introduce countervailing forces to arrest the degradation of the labor market and establish a new standard for good jobs, thereby laying the foundation for a renewed social contract."

    levyinstitute.org/publications

    #Enshittification #Financialization #Economy #JobGuarantee #Capitalism #Unemployment #Neoliberalism

  16. "This paper employs the concept of “enshittification”—the systematic degradation of a service or product in the pursuit of profit—as a powerful metaphor to analyze the decay of the US labor market in the postwar era. Situating this process within Hyman Minsky’s theory of capitalist development, it argues that the current phase of money manager capitalism has accelerated a pervasive “bait-and-switch” dynamic that has emerged since the 1970s. The “bait” was the postwar social contract, which promised but never guaranteed economic security through tight full employment and access to good jobs for all. The “switch” was the neoliberal policy shift that dismantled labor protections, weaponized unemployment (via the NAIRU doctrine), and fostered financialization, leading to stagnant wages, precarity, and household indebtedness. The “trap” is the worker’s inescapable dependency for survival on a job within a system that uses the threat of unemployment as a policy tool. The paper identifies the erosion of four key forces—competition, regulation, interoperability, and worker power, all of which held the tenuous postwar contract together—as the drivers of this enshittification. It concludes by articulating how the federal job guarantee proposal can act as a systemic circuit breaker capable of reverse reengineering the labor market. The job guarantee is not only an alternative to precarious employment and the NAIRU policy framework, but also a comprehensive de facto regulator that introduces much needed competition for labor by firms in the economy. The paper evaluates how the program can introduce countervailing forces to arrest the degradation of the labor market and establish a new standard for good jobs, thereby laying the foundation for a renewed social contract."

    levyinstitute.org/publications

    #Enshittification #Financialization #Economy #JobGuarantee #Capitalism #Unemployment #Neoliberalism

  17. ''as with tech enshittification, labor enshittification "is a political choice, not an economic inevitability." Labor enshittification is the foreseeable outcome of specific policies undertaken in living memory by named individuals. As with tech enshittification, we are under no obligation to preserve those enshittificatory policies. We can replace them with better ones."
    pluralistic.net/2025/11/07/pos
    #enshittification #workers #JobGuarantee.

  18. ''as with tech enshittification, labor enshittification "is a political choice, not an economic inevitability." Labor enshittification is the foreseeable outcome of specific policies undertaken in living memory by named individuals. As with tech enshittification, we are under no obligation to preserve those enshittificatory policies. We can replace them with better ones."
    pluralistic.net/2025/11/07/pos
    #enshittification #workers #JobGuarantee.

  19. ''as with tech enshittification, labor enshittification "is a political choice, not an economic inevitability." Labor enshittification is the foreseeable outcome of specific policies undertaken in living memory by named individuals. As with tech enshittification, we are under no obligation to preserve those enshittificatory policies. We can replace them with better ones."
    pluralistic.net/2025/11/07/pos
    #enshittification #workers #JobGuarantee.

  20. ''as with tech enshittification, labor enshittification "is a political choice, not an economic inevitability." Labor enshittification is the foreseeable outcome of specific policies undertaken in living memory by named individuals. As with tech enshittification, we are under no obligation to preserve those enshittificatory policies. We can replace them with better ones."
    pluralistic.net/2025/11/07/pos
    .

  21. ''as with tech enshittification, labor enshittification "is a political choice, not an economic inevitability." Labor enshittification is the foreseeable outcome of specific policies undertaken in living memory by named individuals. As with tech enshittification, we are under no obligation to preserve those enshittificatory policies. We can replace them with better ones."
    pluralistic.net/2025/11/07/pos
    #enshittification #workers #JobGuarantee.

  22. Monday's blog post (03/11) is now posted (14:11 Kyoto Time) - Supply-side employment services models fail and promote sociopaths - billmitchell.org/blog/?p=62873 #JobGuarantee

  23. Monday's blog post (03/11) is now posted (14:11 Kyoto Time) - Supply-side employment services models fail and promote sociopaths - billmitchell.org/blog/?p=62873 #JobGuarantee

  24. Monday's blog post (03/11) is now posted (14:11 Kyoto Time) - Supply-side employment services models fail and promote sociopaths - billmitchell.org/blog/?p=62873 #JobGuarantee

  25. Monday's blog post (03/11) is now posted (14:11 Kyoto Time) - Supply-side employment services models fail and promote sociopaths - billmitchell.org/blog/?p=62873 #JobGuarantee

  26. Monday's blog post (03/11) is now posted (14:11 Kyoto Time) - Supply-side employment services models fail and promote sociopaths - billmitchell.org/blog/?p=62873 #JobGuarantee