#ipa16 — Public Fediverse posts

While #genAI firms are being faced with criticism for their models containing detailed personal data about individuals, and thinking of how to mitigate this, UK intelligence #SIGINT agencies (e.g. #GCHQ) are seeking powers to effectively lower their oversight in building models precisely to be able to draw unstructured data into personal data about people, claiming that AI firms can do it (whether or not legally!) but they can't https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/aug/01/uk-intelligence-spy-agencies-relax-burdensome-laws-ai-data-bpds?CMP=share_btn_tw #IPA16

"[S]erious and wide ranging compliance failures" around safeguards for intercepted data at #MI5 #IPA16, says the #IPT in a new case from Liberty & @privacyint. Court refuses relief the claimants wanted of quashing warrants & deleting data, but the IPT will accept briefs from the parties as to whether to re-open the previous case on bulk personal datasets and communications data, given MI5 was in breach of its duty of candour about this non-compliance https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Liberty-v-Security-Service-judgment-200123.pdf #InvestigatoryPowers

"[S]erious and wide ranging compliance failures" around safeguards for intercepted data at #MI5 #IPA16, says the #IPT in a new case from Liberty & @privacyint. Court refuses relief the claimants wanted of quashing warrants & deleting data, but the IPT will accept briefs from the parties as to whether to re-open the previous case on bulk personal datasets and communications data, given MI5 was in breach of its duty of candour about this non-compliance https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Liberty-v-Security-Service-judgment-200123.pdf #InvestigatoryPowers

"[S]erious and wide ranging compliance failures" around safeguards for intercepted data at #MI5 #IPA16, says the #IPT in a new case from Liberty & @privacyint. Court refuses relief the claimants wanted of quashing warrants & deleting data, but the IPT will accept briefs from the parties as to whether to re-open the previous case on bulk personal datasets and communications data, given MI5 was in breach of its duty of candour about this non-compliance https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Liberty-v-Security-Service-judgment-200123.pdf #InvestigatoryPowers

"[S]erious and wide ranging compliance failures" around safeguards for intercepted data at #MI5 #IPA16, says the #IPT in a new case from Liberty & @privacyint. Court refuses relief the claimants wanted of quashing warrants & deleting data, but the IPT will accept briefs from the parties as to whether to re-open the previous case on bulk personal datasets and communications data, given MI5 was in breach of its duty of candour about this non-compliance https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Liberty-v-Security-Service-judgment-200123.pdf #InvestigatoryPowers

"[S]erious and wide ranging compliance failures" around safeguards for intercepted data at #MI5 #IPA16, says the #IPT in a new case from Liberty & @privacyint. Court refuses relief the claimants wanted of quashing warrants & deleting data, but the IPT will accept briefs from the parties as to whether to re-open the previous case on bulk personal datasets and communications data, given MI5 was in breach of its duty of candour about this non-compliance https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Liberty-v-Security-Service-judgment-200123.pdf #InvestigatoryPowers