home.social

#inthefiles — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #inthefiles, aggregated by home.social.

  1. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Whelp folks, I warned you there would be a *lot* of videos; particularly when it comes to an Epstein ring scandal that is being actively minimized by our media, and covered up by the US government. As of roughly February 15th, it looks like the Department of Justice has removed 634 documents from its "Epstein Files" releases website that contained the word Trump in them. Furthermore, pretty much nobody in the media seems to have noticed past the first few deletions, so we're heading over to Youtube to check in with Secular Talk's Kyle Kulinski - whose Epstein coverage has by and large, been excellent.

    Unfortunately this video is clipped from Kyle's longer stream show, so it's a bit of a hot mess. The whole 26m clip is about releases from the Epstein files, and I'll make a note of which subjects Kyle covers under the video link, but if you're just interested in the part about Trump's Injustice Department trying to hide his incriminating appearances in the DoJ's Epstein releases, it starts at 8:25.

    youtube.com/watch?v=fh092cvjZLQ

    As I mentioned above, this clip is kind of a grab bag of emerging news about things people are finding in the "Epstein Files" releases. In addition to the deleted files, the video briefly covers the following topics, more or less in this order:

    - Disturbing photos from the Epstein files, including one that appears to be a child's drawing about a dead baby, and a photo of Epstein holding a literal child over his lap to bite her buttocks.

    - A released, partially-redacted email between Epstein and a victim who appears to be 14 years old, that provides clear evidence of Epstein grooming a presumed minor and someone forging documents so Epstein could traffic (likely Eastern European or Russian) girls across the American border.

    - Steve Bannon literally comparing Epstein to a god.

    - A partially-redacted photo of a prepubescent girl being violated and tortured by a group of unidentifiable men. Context is difficult to obtain here, but the photo was real enough for the FBI to collect it as part of its various investigations into Epstein.

    - A released and partially redacted email in the files, from Epstein to Trump ally and current US Ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack, in which Epstein asks Barrack to "send photos of you and child, to make me smile."

    - Kyle also plays a clip from a 2018 BBC documentary, in which multiple women accuse Trump of sexually inappropriate behavior with underage models in New York.

    - Independent journalist Roger Sollenberger found out that a report accusing Trump of sexual assault by a victim the FBI found credible was recorded and placed into the investigative record, literally the day before Epstein turned up dead in 2019.

    - Kyle closes off sourcing three less important, and in one case wildly misinterpreted stories about the Epstein Files, from social media users. I'm sorry to say, this part is emphatically not good journalism; but the rest of the video is fine.

    The misinterpreted story concerns Epstein's former property manager Alfredo Rodriguez and the pedophile blackmailer's "little black book" of contacts. The Twitter user Kyle quotes has, shall we say, a novel interpretation of the events surrounding Rodriguez's possession of the black book, but he is correct that nobody seems to have investigated the people listed in the contacts book, or contacted the names listed in the book that Rodriquez told an undercover FBI officer were Epstein victims. You can read more about that story here:

    cnn.com/2026/02/11/politics/ep

    For those of you interested, I will almost certainly be talking more about Sollenberger's story of the Trump accuser the FBI interviewed right before Epstein died more at a later point in this thread, but if you're feeling impatient, you can find it here:

    sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/

    I don't have the time to watch a 2018 BBC documentary entitled "is Trump a Sex Pest?" at this late a date, given how much we know about Trump's years-long record of abusive, and violent sexual behavior towards women, including multiple allegations of rape I see no reason to disbelieve - but you can find a bit more information about it, and specifically some of the sexual harassment allegations mentioned in Kyle's video here:

    yahoo.com/entertainment/bbc-do

    Finally, you already knew he was in there but I guess we can put Steve Bannon #InTheFiles along with US Ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack; who is about as close as you can get to being on the hypothetical #EpsteinList of sick pedo rapist fucks without me being prepared to actually put you there, after that email from Epstein.

    #Epstein #CoverUp #EpsteinFiles #DoJ #PamBondi #SteveBannon #TomBarrack #JusticeDepartment #SexualAssault #FBI #AlfredoRodriguez

    #inthefiles #epsteinlist #epstein #coverup #epsteinfiles #doj
  2. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Whelp folks, I warned you there would be a *lot* of videos; particularly when it comes to an Epstein ring scandal that is being actively minimized by our media, and covered up by the US government. As of roughly February 15th, it looks like the Department of Justice has removed 634 documents from its "Epstein Files" releases website that contained the word Trump in them. Furthermore, pretty much nobody in the media seems to have noticed past the first few deletions, so we're heading over to Youtube to check in with Secular Talk's Kyle Kulinski - whose Epstein coverage has by and large, been excellent.

    Unfortunately this video is clipped from Kyle's longer stream show, so it's a bit of a hot mess. The whole 26m clip is about releases from the Epstein files, and I'll make a note of which subjects Kyle covers under the video link, but if you're just interested in the part about Trump's Injustice Department trying to hide his incriminating appearances in the DoJ's Epstein releases, it starts at 8:25.

    youtube.com/watch?v=fh092cvjZLQ

    As I mentioned above, this clip is kind of a grab bag of emerging news about things people are finding in the "Epstein Files" releases. In addition to the deleted files, the video briefly covers the following topics, more or less in this order:

    - Disturbing photos from the Epstein files, including one that appears to be a child's drawing about a dead baby, and a photo of Epstein holding a literal child over his lap to bite her buttocks.

    - A released, partially-redacted email between Epstein and a victim who appears to be 14 years old, that provides clear evidence of Epstein grooming a presumed minor and someone forging documents so Epstein could traffic (likely Eastern European or Russian) girls across the American border.

    - Steve Bannon literally comparing Epstein to a god.

    - A partially-redacted photo of a prepubescent girl being violated and tortured by a group of unidentifiable men. Context is difficult to obtain here, but the photo was real enough for the FBI to collect it as part of its various investigations into Epstein.

    - A released and partially redacted email in the files, from Epstein to Trump ally and current US Ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack, in which Epstein asks Barrack to "send photos of you and child, to make me smile."

    - Kyle also plays a clip from a 2018 BBC documentary, in which multiple women accuse Trump of sexually inappropriate behavior with underage models in New York.

    - Independent journalist Roger Sollenberger found out that a report accusing Trump of sexual assault by a victim the FBI found credible was recorded and placed into the investigative record, literally the day before Epstein turned up dead in 2019.

    - Kyle closes off sourcing three less important, and in one case wildly misinterpreted stories about the Epstein Files, from social media users. I'm sorry to say, this part is emphatically not good journalism; but the rest of the video is fine.

    The misinterpreted story concerns Epstein's former property manager Alfredo Rodriguez and the pedophile blackmailer's "little black book" of contacts. The Twitter user Kyle quotes has, shall we say, a novel interpretation of the events surrounding Rodriguez's possession of the black book, but he is correct that nobody seems to have investigated the people listed in the contacts book, or contacted the names listed in the book that Rodriquez told an undercover FBI officer were Epstein victims. You can read more about that story here:

    cnn.com/2026/02/11/politics/ep

    For those of you interested, I will almost certainly be talking more about Sollenberger's story of the Trump accuser the FBI interviewed right before Epstein died more at a later point in this thread, but if you're feeling impatient, you can find it here:

    sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/

    I don't have the time to watch a 2018 BBC documentary entitled "is Trump a Sex Pest?" at this late a date, given how much we know about Trump's years-long record of abusive, and violent sexual behavior towards women, including multiple allegations of rape I see no reason to disbelieve - but you can find a bit more information about it, and specifically some of the sexual harassment allegations mentioned in Kyle's video here:

    yahoo.com/entertainment/bbc-do

    Finally, you already knew he was in there but I guess we can put Steve Bannon #InTheFiles along with US Ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack; who is about as close as you can get to being on the hypothetical #EpsteinList of sick pedo rapist fucks without me being prepared to actually put you there, after that email from Epstein.

    #Epstein #CoverUp #EpsteinFiles #DoJ #PamBondi #SteveBannon #TomBarrack #JusticeDepartment #SexualAssault #FBI #AlfredoRodriguez

    #inthefiles #epsteinlist #epstein #coverup #epsteinfiles #doj
  3. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Whelp folks, I warned you there would be a *lot* of videos; particularly when it comes to an Epstein ring scandal that is being actively minimized by our media, and covered up by the US government. As of roughly February 15th, it looks like the Department of Justice has removed 634 documents from its "Epstein Files" releases website that contained the word Trump in them. Furthermore, pretty much nobody in the media seems to have noticed past the first few deletions, so we're heading over to Youtube to check in with Secular Talk's Kyle Kulinski - whose Epstein coverage has by and large, been excellent.

    Unfortunately this video is clipped from Kyle's longer stream show, so it's a bit of a hot mess. The whole 26m clip is about releases from the Epstein files, and I'll make a note of which subjects Kyle covers under the video link, but if you're just interested in the part about Trump's Injustice Department trying to hide his incriminating appearances in the DoJ's Epstein releases, it starts at 8:25.

    youtube.com/watch?v=fh092cvjZLQ

    As I mentioned above, this clip is kind of a grab bag of emerging news about things people are finding in the "Epstein Files" releases. In addition to the deleted files, the video briefly covers the following topics, more or less in this order:

    - Disturbing photos from the Epstein files, including one that appears to be a child's drawing about a dead baby, and a photo of Epstein holding a literal child over his lap to bite her buttocks.

    - A released, partially-redacted email between Epstein and a victim who appears to be 14 years old, that provides clear evidence of Epstein grooming a presumed minor and someone forging documents so Epstein could traffic (likely Eastern European or Russian) girls across the American border.

    - Steve Bannon literally comparing Epstein to a god.

    - A partially-redacted photo of a prepubescent girl being violated and tortured by a group of unidentifiable men. Context is difficult to obtain here, but the photo was real enough for the FBI to collect it as part of its various investigations into Epstein.

    - A released and partially redacted email in the files, from Epstein to Trump ally and current US Ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack, in which Epstein asks Barrack to "send photos of you and child, to make me smile."

    - Kyle also plays a clip from a 2018 BBC documentary, in which multiple women accuse Trump of sexually inappropriate behavior with underage models in New York.

    - Independent journalist Roger Sollenberger found out that a report accusing Trump of sexual assault by a victim the FBI found credible was recorded and placed into the investigative record, literally the day before Epstein turned up dead in 2019.

    - Kyle closes off sourcing three less important, and in one case wildly misinterpreted stories about the Epstein Files, from social media users. I'm sorry to say, this part is emphatically not good journalism; but the rest of the video is fine.

    The misinterpreted story concerns Epstein's former property manager Alfredo Rodriguez and the pedophile blackmailer's "little black book" of contacts. The Twitter user Kyle quotes has, shall we say, a novel interpretation of the events surrounding Rodriguez's possession of the black book, but he is correct that nobody seems to have investigated the people listed in the contacts book, or contacted the names listed in the book that Rodriquez told an undercover FBI officer were Epstein victims. You can read more about that story here:

    cnn.com/2026/02/11/politics/ep

    For those of you interested, I will almost certainly be talking more about Sollenberger's story of the Trump accuser the FBI interviewed right before Epstein died more at a later point in this thread, but if you're feeling impatient, you can find it here:

    sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/

    I don't have the time to watch a 2018 BBC documentary entitled "is Trump a Sex Pest?" at this late a date, given how much we know about Trump's years-long record of abusive, and violent sexual behavior towards women, including multiple allegations of rape I see no reason to disbelieve - but you can find a bit more information about it, and specifically some of the sexual harassment allegations mentioned in Kyle's video here:

    yahoo.com/entertainment/bbc-do

    Finally, you already knew he was in there but I guess we can put Steve Bannon #InTheFiles along with US Ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack; who is about as close as you can get to being on the hypothetical #EpsteinList of sick pedo rapist fucks without me being prepared to actually put you there, after that email from Epstein.

    #Epstein #CoverUp #EpsteinFiles #DoJ #PamBondi #SteveBannon #TomBarrack #JusticeDepartment #SexualAssault #FBI #AlfredoRodriguez

    #alfredorodriguez #fbi #sexualassault #justicedepartment #tombarrack #stevebannon
  4. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Whelp folks, I warned you there would be a *lot* of videos; particularly when it comes to an Epstein ring scandal that is being actively minimized by our media, and covered up by the US government. As of roughly February 15th, it looks like the Department of Justice has removed 634 documents from its "Epstein Files" releases website that contained the word Trump in them. Furthermore, pretty much nobody in the media seems to have noticed past the first few deletions, so we're heading over to Youtube to check in with Secular Talk's Kyle Kulinski - whose Epstein coverage has by and large, been excellent.

    Unfortunately this video is clipped from Kyle's longer stream show, so it's a bit of a hot mess. The whole 26m clip is about releases from the Epstein files, and I'll make a note of which subjects Kyle covers under the video link, but if you're just interested in the part about Trump's Injustice Department trying to hide his incriminating appearances in the DoJ's Epstein releases, it starts at 8:25.

    youtube.com/watch?v=fh092cvjZLQ

    As I mentioned above, this clip is kind of a grab bag of emerging news about things people are finding in the "Epstein Files" releases. In addition to the deleted files, the video briefly covers the following topics, more or less in this order:

    - Disturbing photos from the Epstein files, including one that appears to be a child's drawing about a dead baby, and a photo of Epstein holding a literal child over his lap to bite her buttocks.

    - A released, partially-redacted email between Epstein and a victim who appears to be 14 years old, that provides clear evidence of Epstein grooming a presumed minor and someone forging documents so Epstein could traffic (likely Eastern European or Russian) girls across the American border.

    - Steve Bannon literally comparing Epstein to a god.

    - A partially-redacted photo of a prepubescent girl being violated and tortured by a group of unidentifiable men. Context is difficult to obtain here, but the photo was real enough for the FBI to collect it as part of its various investigations into Epstein.

    - A released and partially redacted email in the files, from Epstein to Trump ally and current US Ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack, in which Epstein asks Barrack to "send photos of you and child, to make me smile."

    - Kyle also plays a clip from a 2018 BBC documentary, in which multiple women accuse Trump of sexually inappropriate behavior with underage models in New York.

    - Independent journalist Roger Sollenberger found out that a report accusing Trump of sexual assault by a victim the FBI found credible was recorded and placed into the investigative record, literally the day before Epstein turned up dead in 2019.

    - Kyle closes off sourcing three less important, and in one case wildly misinterpreted stories about the Epstein Files, from social media users. I'm sorry to say, this part is emphatically not good journalism; but the rest of the video is fine.

    The misinterpreted story concerns Epstein's former property manager Alfredo Rodriguez and the pedophile blackmailer's "little black book" of contacts. The Twitter user Kyle quotes has, shall we say, a novel interpretation of the events surrounding Rodriguez's possession of the black book, but he is correct that nobody seems to have investigated the people listed in the contacts book, or contacted the names listed in the book that Rodriquez told an undercover FBI officer were Epstein victims. You can read more about that story here:

    cnn.com/2026/02/11/politics/ep

    For those of you interested, I will almost certainly be talking more about Sollenberger's story of the Trump accuser the FBI interviewed right before Epstein died more at a later point in this thread, but if you're feeling impatient, you can find it here:

    sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/

    I don't have the time to watch a 2018 BBC documentary entitled "is Trump a Sex Pest?" at this late a date, given how much we know about Trump's years-long record of abusive, and violent sexual behavior towards women, including multiple allegations of rape I see no reason to disbelieve - but you can find a bit more information about it, and specifically some of the sexual harassment allegations mentioned in Kyle's video here:

    yahoo.com/entertainment/bbc-do

    Finally, you already knew he was in there but I guess we can put Steve Bannon #InTheFiles along with US Ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack; who is about as close as you can get to being on the hypothetical #EpsteinList of sick pedo rapist fucks without me being prepared to actually put you there, after that email from Epstein.

    #Epstein #CoverUp #EpsteinFiles #DoJ #PamBondi #SteveBannon #TomBarrack #JusticeDepartment #SexualAssault #FBI #AlfredoRodriguez

    #inthefiles #epsteinlist #epstein #coverup #epsteinfiles #doj
  5. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Okay, let's put another rich and powerful rapist #InTheFiles and on the #EpsteinList - shall we? Meet Jes Staley, the former CEO of Barclays bank and one of the few men who actually suffered any consequences from his extremely fucking gross relationship with the world's most famous pedophile blackmailer.

    Staley's ouster as top dog at Barclays grew out of a 2019 letter to the Financial Conduct Authority declaring that while he knew Epstein, the two men “did not have a close relationship.” This was an easily-exposed lie; so Staley stepped down from Barclays in 2021, but that only turned out to be half the story. In March 2025, Staley told a UK tribunal that while yes, he'd had a sexual relationship with one of Epstein's employees ("a member of his staff") at Epstein's brother's apartment, it was entirely consensual. As the FCA lawyer at the hearing noted however, the woman in question had reached a settlement with the Epstein Estate and apparently reserved her right to sue Staley while doing so; all of which strongly implies she was a victim of the Epstein ring, not his staffer. Furthermore, when asked to explain the bizarre and incriminating email exchange between Staley and Epstein in which the former Barclays boss and the world's most famous pedophile talked about, yes, Disney princesses, Jes simply punted and claimed he had no explanation for the emails he exchanged with again, the world's most famous pedophile blackmailer in 2010.

    This hearing certainly wasn't enough to convince the FCA to lift Staley's UK banking industry ban, but his paper-thin denials and status have conspired to keep Staley out of prison, so far.

    Which is why, nobody should be surprised that the recent Justice Department "Epstein Files" releases not only expose Staley as an accused rapist, but also blow a giant hole in Kash Patel's lie under oath that the DOJ had no evidence Epstein was trafficking women to powerful men.

    theguardian.com/us-news/2026/f

    Rape allegation against ex-Barclays CEO Jes Staley was raised in US Epstein investigation

    "US prosecutors reviewed allegations of rape and bodily harm against the former Barclays boss and former JP Morgan banker Jes Staley, according to newly unsealed files linked to the child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    Multiple documents in the Epstein files cite serious allegations of sexual misconduct against Staley, including that he forced a woman to touch his genitals during a massage before raping her, and left “bloody marks” on the arms of a woman he called “tinkerbell.”

    So, let me see if I have this straight: the US DoJ was investigating Barclays boss Jes Staley, for rape allegations against him connected directly to the Epstein ring, by a woman who claims he called her "tinkerbell" during the encounter which occurred while she was giving Staley a massage, arranged by Epstein. And that very same guy, has no way to explain the creepy ass emails he's sending to the world's most famous pedophile blackmailer, about "Snow White" and "Beauty and the Beast?" Sure bro.

    "Staley was involved in an exchange with Epstein referring to Disney princesses from 9 to 10 July 2010, details of which have been circulating in the media since 2021. In those emails Staley tells Epstein: “That was fun. Say hi to Snow White.”

    “What character would you like next?” Epstein later asks, to which Staley replied: “Beauty and the Beast.” Epstein responded: “Well one side is availble [sic].”

    A UK court last year heard that Staley had denied knowledge of this exchange, saying “I, honest to God, when I went through the emails I have no idea what this refers to. I have no idea who Snow White is.”

    Furthermore, lest you think this is just some code for bros (disgusting as they may be) hooking up bros with dating options, the files also contain evidence that Epstein literally instructed someone to buy a fucking Snow White costume, before Staley thanked him for making his fantasies come true I guess.

    "Newly unsealed documents show that there was another email sent to Epstein by an unnamed individual, also on 10 July 2010, saying “the snow white was f..ed twice as soon as she put her costume))”.

    The Epstein files also show Epstein asked an unnamed individual to buy a Snow White costume weeks before that exchange with Staley, on 20 June 2010. “brett ratner ,is going to film a big movie„ Snow White, i would love to take photos of you in a snow white costume. you can get it from the costume store”. “Will get it!”, the recipient replies."

    Folks, #KashPatel is a liar and Jeff Epstein was trafficking women to powerful men. There are more victim statements like this one exposing Epstein as the fantasy-maker for rich, powerful, and violently abusive men. The women victimized by the Epstein ring have told us this directly, but we all refuse to believe it. Today "Tinkerbell" stands vindicated, how many more victims will we cruelly ignore until evidence forces our society to admit this is real?

    #Epstein #JesStaley #Barclays #DoJ

    #inthefiles #epsteinlist #kashpatel #epstein #jesstaley #barclays
  6. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Now I'd like to shift the lens back to the details of the Trump-loyal Department of Justice's illegal coverup operation to protect powerful abusers and confidants exposed in the #EpsteinFiles releases, because once you understand the mechanics of the strategy gamed out in Epstein's email box, it becomes very easy to see how Pam Bondi and the rest of Trump's criminal minions in the DoJ are helping to advance the quest by rich and powerful abusers, to silence Epstein survivors and hide their own complicity and potential involvement in these crimes. With that in mind, let's look at this short (18m) video by Mike Figueredo of the Humanist Report, that talks about Epstein survivors accusations that Pam Bondi released their names on purpose to expose them to harm, as well as Trump's attorney general openly perjuring herself to protect the Swine Emperor from allegations of rape, and possibly even murder, found in the Injustice Department's still heavily redacted Epstein Files releases.

    youtube.com/watch?v=dQH735I1pHI

    Pam Bondi is Breaking Laws and Endangering Victims to Protect Epstein's Co-Conspirators

    "And it proves we have a two-tiered justice system in this country where the most heinous sex crimes, and even crimes against humanity, are effectively decriminalized if you have money and power. Meanwhile, if you get caught smoking weed in certain states they'll throw the book at you. It's just so ridiculous. This isn't a legal system, it's a failed state where a cabal of pedophile elites run the country like the fucking Mafia."

    Taken as a whole, this video confirms that the Department of Justice, and Pam Bondi in particular are indeed engaging in a criminal coverup to protect powerful people in the Epstein files, including almost certainly Donald Trump himself. Mike talks about why both he and the Epstein survivors believe the Injustice Department released their names intentionally; specifically to allow powerful Epstein associates to throw enough expensive lawfare at them to coerce their silence. He demonstrates this concept by examining former Trump lawyer and longtime defender of powerful men accused of pedo rapey shit Alan Dershowitz's years-long, still ongoing quest to expose Epstein accusers' names to facilitate defamation lawsuits. It goes without saying that we can put #AlanDershowitz both #InTheFiles and on the hypothetical #EpsteinList of accused abusers and traffickers, but in light of what we already know about Epstein's efforts to blunt the #MeToo movement, and the Trump DoJ's (both of them) efforts to cover up this scandal, Dersh's quest to convince the world that he and his friends are victims of a neo-McCarthyist witch hunt targeting rich men, takes on a far more sinister complexion.

    Which brings us to the second part of the video, where we get to watch Congressman #TedLiu get Pam Bondi to openly perjure herself. After coaxing Bondi to emphatically state that there's no evidence Trump committed any crimes, Liu then produces a witness statement taken by the FBI's National Threat Operation Center from a limo driver who told the feds he heard Trump talking to a man named "Jeff" about abusing girls. Shockingly, this limo driver also told the FBI that he'd met a woman who said she was raped by Trump and Epstein, and that woman ended up with "her head blown off" in an incident police said could not be a suicide. I'm am not fucking with you at all here folks, those are all things Ted Liu spoke into the Congressional record during Pam Bondi's oversight hearing. As Liu noted, the Department of Justice literally never talked to the limo driver again, and the woman who "got her head blown" off's death was never investigated by anyone at all - despite police suspicion it might be a homicide.

    Finally Mike notes that Trump's DoJ under Bondi has been caught tracking the searches of US Congress members who have sought access to the "unredacted" but still redacted Epstein Files. It is presently unclear why the Trump regime is engaged in active and almost certainly illegal surveillance of Congress members exercising their rights as enshrined by the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law, but you can bet there ain't an innocent reason for this actual McCarthyist bullshit either. Also, while it's not super important I would like to once again remind you that Trump, the man accused in an FBI witness report of raping a girl who ended up murdered, literally said this particular Epstein Files release "exonerated him."

    Folks as complicated as the Epstein story is, the coverup behind it isn't complicated at all. Trump's DoJ is breaking the law to protect Epstein's rich friends, including Donald Trump, and it doesn't take a fucking genius to figure out why they'd be doing that. The entire Trump administration is effectively a criminal enterprise, run by a rich pedo rapist with dirt on everyone.

    (repost to thread)

    #Epstein #EpsteinFiles #FBI #Trump #DepartmentOfJustice #PamBondi #MikeFigueredo #Coverup #BelieveWomen

    #epsteinfiles #alandershowitz #inthefiles #epsteinlist #metoo #tedliu
  7. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Alright, so we finally have our first undeniable #EpsteinPlot post; I'm sorry it took us like twenty posts to get here but like I warned you way back when I first repurposed this thread to talk about Epstein, his powerful friends, and the incredibly massive coverup surrounding all of this, this is multi-decade crime against not only Epstein's victims, but our society as a whole. I can't walk you through it in three 5K character posts, even if I wish I could.

    Of course, #Epstein plotting to discredit sexual assault survivors out of his own self interest with other powerful men accused of abuse during the #MeToo moment isn't the biggest conspiracy fact exposed in the Epstein Files, nor are his co-conspirators the most powerful people among Epstein's friends, confidants, plotters, and advisors. The people in the story I shared above are all scumbags and monsters, but they're pretty small fry compared to say, two US presidents (including the guy in office right now) and a former Israeli Prime Minister.

    Despite this however, even this chain of plotting in Epstein's email box, directly corelates with macro decisions made by members of the #EpsteinClass that affect our society as a whole - in this case US President #DonaldTrump, who is not only #InTheFiles but I'm comfortable putting on the #EpsteinList of actual pedo rapists and likely human traffickers. To understand the connection between the micro and the macro, Let's turn to this recent piece by Joan Wallach Scott that talks about Trump's executive order on gender (the same one that says I, as a trans woman basically don't exist) and the growing, successful quest across the United States to eliminate gender studies courses, through the lens of an Epstein class chock full of extremely powerful abusers and more than willing enablers exposed in the US Justice Departments various (and still incomplete) #EpsteinFiles releases.

    theguardian.com/commentisfree/

    Gender studies courses are shutting down across the US. The Epstein files reveal why

    "The move to cancel gender studies is explicitly justified as a way to comply with Donald Trump’s executive order of last year titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. That document makes “the biological reality of sex” a matter not of science but of law.

    Until this week’s latest dump of the Epstein files by Trump’s justice department, I hadn’t seen the connection between the two. But now it’s as clear as day. The abolition of gender studies is a way of further guaranteeing impunity to the elite men whose contempt for and exploitation of women and girls apparently knew no bounds, whether they actually slept with the women on offer or simply shared Epstein’s fantasies in order to gain influence or funding."

    Okay so first things first, lets put lets put former director of the Whitney Museum #DavidRoss "in the files" and on the "confirmed sick fucks" list even if he was bonding with Epstein over pedo shit, not necessarily committing rape crimes as far as we know, yet. What a revolting human being.

    With that out of the way, I think the author's argument that Trump's attempt to enshrine biological gender determinism into law, and a fascist American right's weaponization of that law to eradicate critical studies programs that not only elevate women's voices but illuminate the structural causes behind the victimization of women and girls by powerful men and the existence of the Epstein ring itself, are a clear and obvious boon to abusers and confidants named in the Epstein files, is utterly unassailable. Re-marginalizing women's voices as a whole, further marginalizes women accusing powerful men of sexual assault; full stop.

    So at that point, all that's left to argue about is whether or not this relationship between Epstein's plots to rewind time on the accusations against him, the larger Epstein circle of friends attempts to rewind time on #MeToo accusations, and noted Epstein associate and imo exposed ring member Donald Trump's attempts to rewind time on women having a voice to accuse men like him in the first place, is intentional. On that matter, the Epstein Files are as of yet silent, but as a rational observer I think the establishment world around us warping to Trump's whims and desires silence and further re-marginalize women and sexual violence victims, is singing quite loudly. I can't prove that Trump's executive order, or the decision by US Universities to end gender studies courses arose directly out of Jeff Epstein's plotting, but going forward I want you to pay attention to how often the things Trump and his fascist administration do to reshape our society, just happen to line up perfectly with the ideas and strategies being run through Jeff Epstein's inbox by some of the most powerful, influential, and quite frankly fucking disgusting people on Earth.

    #Trump #GOP #JoanWallachScott #Patriarchy #GenderStudies

    (repost after accidental deletion)

    #epsteinplot #epstein #metoo #epsteinclass #donaldtrump #inthefiles
  8. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Alright, so we finally have our first undeniable #EpsteinPlot post; I'm sorry it took us like twenty posts to get here but like I warned you way back when I first repurposed this thread to talk about Epstein, his powerful friends, and the incredibly massive coverup surrounding all of this, this is multi-decade crime against not only Epstein's victims, but our society as a whole. I can't walk you through it in three 5K character posts, even if I wish I could.

    Of course, #Epstein plotting to discredit sexual assault survivors out of his own self interest with other powerful men accused of abuse during the #MeToo moment isn't the biggest conspiracy fact exposed in the Epstein Files, nor are his co-conspirators the most powerful people among Epstein's friends, confidants, plotters, and advisors. The people in the story I shared above are all scumbags and monsters, but they're pretty small fry compared to say, two US presidents (including the guy in office right now) and a former Israeli Prime Minister.

    Despite this however, even this chain of plotting in Epstein's email box, directly corelates with macro decisions made by members of the #EpsteinClass that affect our society as a whole - in this case US President #DonaldTrump, who is not only #InTheFiles but I'm comfortable putting on the #EpsteinList of actual pedo rapists and likely human traffickers. To understand the connection between the micro and the macro, Let's turn to this recent piece by Joan Wallach Scott that talks about Trump's executive order on gender (the same one that says I, as a trans woman basically don't exist) and the growing, successful quest across the United States to eliminate gender studies courses, through the lens of an Epstein class chock full of extremely powerful abusers and more than willing enablers exposed in the US Justice Departments various (and still incomplete) #EpsteinFiles releases.

    theguardian.com/commentisfree/

    Gender studies courses are shutting down across the US. The Epstein files reveal why

    "The move to cancel gender studies is explicitly justified as a way to comply with Donald Trump’s executive order of last year titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. That document makes “the biological reality of sex” a matter not of science but of law.

    Until this week’s latest dump of the Epstein files by Trump’s justice department, I hadn’t seen the connection between the two. But now it’s as clear as day. The abolition of gender studies is a way of further guaranteeing impunity to the elite men whose contempt for and exploitation of women and girls apparently knew no bounds, whether they actually slept with the women on offer or simply shared Epstein’s fantasies in order to gain influence or funding."

    Okay so first things first, lets put lets put former director of the Whitney Museum #DavidRoss "in the files" and on the "confirmed sick fucks" list even if he was bonding with Epstein over pedo shit, not necessarily committing rape crimes as far as we know, yet. What a revolting human being.

    With that out of the way, I think the author's argument that Trump's attempt to enshrine biological gender determinism into law, and a fascist American right's weaponization of that law to eradicate critical studies programs that not only elevate women's voices but illuminate the structural causes behind the victimization of women and girls by powerful men and the existence of the Epstein ring itself, are a clear and obvious boon to abusers and confidants named in the Epstein files, is utterly unassailable. Re-marginalizing women's voices as a whole, further marginalizes women accusing powerful men of sexual assault; full stop.

    So at that point, all that's left to argue about is whether or not this relationship between Epstein's plots to rewind time on the accusations against him, the larger Epstein circle of friends attempts to rewind time on #MeToo accusations, and noted Epstein associate and imo exposed ring member Donald Trump's attempts to rewind time on women having a voice to accuse men like him in the first place, is intentional. On that matter, the Epstein Files are as of yet silent, but as a rational observer I think the establishment world around us warping to Trump's whims and desires silence and further re-marginalize women and sexual violence victims, is singing quite loudly. I can't prove that Trump's executive order, or the decision by US Universities to end gender studies courses arose directly out of Jeff Epstein's plotting, but going forward I want you to pay attention to how often the things Trump and his fascist administration do to reshape our society, just happen to line up perfectly with the ideas and strategies being run through Jeff Epstein's inbox by some of the most powerful, influential, and quite frankly fucking disgusting people on Earth.

    #Trump #GOP #JoanWallachScott #Patriarchy #GenderStudies

    (repost after accidental deletion)

    #epsteinplot #epstein #metoo #epsteinclass #donaldtrump #inthefiles
  9. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Alright, so we finally have our first undeniable #EpsteinPlot post; I'm sorry it took us like twenty posts to get here but like I warned you way back when I first repurposed this thread to talk about Epstein, his powerful friends, and the incredibly massive coverup surrounding all of this, this is multi-decade crime against not only Epstein's victims, but our society as a whole. I can't walk you through it in three 5K character posts, even if I wish I could.

    Of course, #Epstein plotting to discredit sexual assault survivors out of his own self interest with other powerful men accused of abuse during the #MeToo moment isn't the biggest conspiracy fact exposed in the Epstein Files, nor are his co-conspirators the most powerful people among Epstein's friends, confidants, plotters, and advisors. The people in the story I shared above are all scumbags and monsters, but they're pretty small fry compared to say, two US presidents (including the guy in office right now) and a former Israeli Prime Minister.

    Despite this however, even this chain of plotting in Epstein's email box, directly corelates with macro decisions made by members of the #EpsteinClass that affect our society as a whole - in this case US President #DonaldTrump, who is not only #InTheFiles but I'm comfortable putting on the #EpsteinList of actual pedo rapists and likely human traffickers. To understand the connection between the micro and the macro, Let's turn to this recent piece by Joan Wallach Scott that talks about Trump's executive order on gender (the same one that says I, as a trans woman basically don't exist) and the growing, successful quest across the United States to eliminate gender studies courses, through the lens of an Epstein class chock full of extremely powerful abusers and more than willing enablers exposed in the US Justice Departments various (and still incomplete) #EpsteinFiles releases.

    theguardian.com/commentisfree/

    Gender studies courses are shutting down across the US. The Epstein files reveal why

    "The move to cancel gender studies is explicitly justified as a way to comply with Donald Trump’s executive order of last year titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. That document makes “the biological reality of sex” a matter not of science but of law.

    Until this week’s latest dump of the Epstein files by Trump’s justice department, I hadn’t seen the connection between the two. But now it’s as clear as day. The abolition of gender studies is a way of further guaranteeing impunity to the elite men whose contempt for and exploitation of women and girls apparently knew no bounds, whether they actually slept with the women on offer or simply shared Epstein’s fantasies in order to gain influence or funding."

    Okay so first things first, lets put lets put former director of the Whitney Museum #DavidRoss "in the files" and on the "confirmed sick fucks" list even if he was bonding with Epstein over pedo shit, not necessarily committing rape crimes as far as we know, yet. What a revolting human being.

    With that out of the way, I think the author's argument that Trump's attempt to enshrine biological gender determinism into law, and a fascist American right's weaponization of that law to eradicate critical studies programs that not only elevate women's voices but illuminate the structural causes behind the victimization of women and girls by powerful men and the existence of the Epstein ring itself, are a clear and obvious boon to abusers and confidants named in the Epstein files, is utterly unassailable. Re-marginalizing women's voices as a whole, further marginalizes women accusing powerful men of sexual assault; full stop.

    So at that point, all that's left to argue about is whether or not this relationship between Epstein's plots to rewind time on the accusations against him, the larger Epstein circle of friends attempts to rewind time on #MeToo accusations, and noted Epstein associate and imo exposed ring member Donald Trump's attempts to rewind time on women having a voice to accuse men like him in the first place, is intentional. On that matter, the Epstein Files are as of yet silent, but as a rational observer I think the establishment world around us warping to Trump's whims and desires silence and further re-marginalize women and sexual violence victims, is singing quite loudly. I can't prove that Trump's executive order, or the decision by US Universities to end gender studies courses arose directly out of Jeff Epstein's plotting, but going forward I want you to pay attention to how often the things Trump and his fascist administration do to reshape our society, just happen to line up perfectly with the ideas and strategies being run through Jeff Epstein's inbox by some of the most powerful, influential, and quite frankly fucking disgusting people on Earth.

    #Trump #GOP #JoanWallachScott #Patriarchy #GenderStudies

    (repost after accidental deletion)

    #epsteinplot #epstein #metoo #epsteinclass #donaldtrump #inthefiles
  10. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Alright, so we finally have our first undeniable #EpsteinPlot post; I'm sorry it took us like twenty posts to get here but like I warned you way back when I first repurposed this thread to talk about Epstein, his powerful friends, and the incredibly massive coverup surrounding all of this, this is multi-decade crime against not only Epstein's victims, but our society as a whole. I can't walk you through it in three 5K character posts, even if I wish I could.

    Of course, #Epstein plotting to discredit sexual assault survivors out of his own self interest with other powerful men accused of abuse during the #MeToo moment isn't the biggest conspiracy fact exposed in the Epstein Files, nor are his co-conspirators the most powerful people among Epstein's friends, confidants, plotters, and advisors. The people in the story I shared above are all scumbags and monsters, but they're pretty small fry compared to say, two US presidents (including the guy in office right now) and a former Israeli Prime Minister.

    Despite this however, even this chain of plotting in Epstein's email box, directly corelates with macro decisions made by members of the #EpsteinClass that affect our society as a whole - in this case US President #DonaldTrump, who is not only #InTheFiles but I'm comfortable putting on the #EpsteinList of actual pedo rapists and likely human traffickers. To understand the connection between the micro and the macro, Let's turn to this recent piece by Joan Wallach Scott that talks about Trump's executive order on gender (the same one that says I, as a trans woman basically don't exist) and the growing, successful quest across the United States to eliminate gender studies courses, through the lens of an Epstein class chock full of extremely powerful abusers and more than willing enablers exposed in the US Justice Departments various (and still incomplete) #EpsteinFiles releases.

    theguardian.com/commentisfree/

    Gender studies courses are shutting down across the US. The Epstein files reveal why

    "The move to cancel gender studies is explicitly justified as a way to comply with Donald Trump’s executive order of last year titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. That document makes “the biological reality of sex” a matter not of science but of law.

    Until this week’s latest dump of the Epstein files by Trump’s justice department, I hadn’t seen the connection between the two. But now it’s as clear as day. The abolition of gender studies is a way of further guaranteeing impunity to the elite men whose contempt for and exploitation of women and girls apparently knew no bounds, whether they actually slept with the women on offer or simply shared Epstein’s fantasies in order to gain influence or funding."

    Okay so first things first, lets put lets put former director of the Whitney Museum #DavidRoss "in the files" and on the "confirmed sick fucks" list even if he was bonding with Epstein over pedo shit, not necessarily committing rape crimes as far as we know, yet. What a revolting human being.

    With that out of the way, I think the author's argument that Trump's attempt to enshrine biological gender determinism into law, and a fascist American right's weaponization of that law to eradicate critical studies programs that not only elevate women's voices but illuminate the structural causes behind the victimization of women and girls by powerful men and the existence of the Epstein ring itself, are a clear and obvious boon to abusers and confidants named in the Epstein files, is utterly unassailable. Re-marginalizing women's voices as a whole, further marginalizes women accusing powerful men of sexual assault; full stop.

    So at that point, all that's left to argue about is whether or not this relationship between Epstein's plots to rewind time on the accusations against him, the larger Epstein circle of friends attempts to rewind time on #MeToo accusations, and noted Epstein associate and imo exposed ring member Donald Trump's attempts to rewind time on women having a voice to accuse men like him in the first place, is intentional. On that matter, the Epstein Files are as of yet silent, but as a rational observer I think the establishment world around us warping to Trump's whims and desires silence and further re-marginalize women and sexual violence victims, is singing quite loudly. I can't prove that Trump's executive order, or the decision by US Universities to end gender studies courses arose directly out of Jeff Epstein's plotting, but going forward I want you to pay attention to how often the things Trump and his fascist administration do to reshape our society, just happen to line up perfectly with the ideas and strategies being run through Jeff Epstein's inbox by some of the most powerful, influential, and quite frankly fucking disgusting people on Earth.

    #Trump #GOP #JoanWallachScott #Patriarchy #GenderStudies

    (repost after accidental deletion)

    #genderstudies #patriarchy #joanwallachscott #gop #trump #davidross
  11. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Now I'd like to shift the lens back to the details of the Trump-loyal Department of Justice's illegal coverup operation to protect powerful abusers and confidants exposed in the #EpsteinFiles releases, because once you understand the mechanics of the strategy gamed out in Epstein's email box, it becomes very easy to see how Pam Bondi and the rest of Trump's criminal minions in the DoJ are helping to advance the quest by rich and powerful abusers, to silence Epstein survivors and hide their own complicity and potential involvement in these crimes. With that in mind, let's look at this short (18m) video by Mike Figueredo of the Humanist Report, that talks about Epstein survivors accusations that Pam Bondi released their names on purpose to expose them to harm, as well as Trump's attorney general openly perjuring herself to protect the Swine Emperor from allegations of rape, and possibly even murder, found in the Injustice Department's still heavily redacted Epstein Files releases.

    youtube.com/watch?v=dQH735I1pHI

    Pam Bondi is Breaking Laws and Endangering Victims to Protect Epstein's Co-Conspirators

    "And it proves we have a two-tiered justice system in this country where the most heinous sex crimes, and even crimes against humanity, are effectively decriminalized if you have money and power. Meanwhile, if you get caught smoking weed in certain states they'll throw the book at you. It's just so ridiculous. This isn't a legal system, it's a failed state where a cabal of pedophile elites run the country like the fucking Mafia."

    Taken as a whole, this video confirms that the Department of Justice, and Pam Bondi in particular are indeed engaging in a criminal coverup to protect powerful people in the Epstein files, including almost certainly Donald Trump himself. Mike talks about why both he and the Epstein survivors believe the Injustice Department released their names intentionally; specifically to allow powerful Epstein associates to throw enough expensive lawfare at them to coerce their silence. He demonstrates this concept by examining former Trump lawyer and longtime defender of powerful men accused of pedo rapey shit Alan Dershowitz's years-long, still ongoing quest to expose Epstein accusers' names to facilitate defamation lawsuits. It goes without saying that we can put #AlanDershowitz both #InTheFiles and on the hypothetical #EpsteinList of accused abusers and traffickers, but in light of what we already know about Epstein's efforts to blunt the #MeToo movement, and the Trump DoJ's (both of them) efforts to cover up this scandal, Dersh's quest to convince the world that he and his friends are victims of a neo-McCarthyist witch hunt targeting rich men, takes on a far more sinister complexion.

    Which brings us to the second part of the video, where we get to watch Congressman #TedLiu get Pam Bondi to openly perjure herself. After coaxing Bondi to emphatically state that there's no evidence Trump committed any crimes, Liu then produces a witness statement taken by the FBI's National Threat Operation Center from a limo driver who told the feds he heard Trump talking to a man named "Jeff" about abusing girls. Shockingly, this limo driver also told the FBI that he'd met a woman who said she was raped by Trump and Epstein, and that woman ended up with "her head blown off" in an incident police said could not be a suicide. I'm am not fucking with you at all here folks, those are all things Ted Liu spoke into the Congressional record during Pam Bondi's oversight hearing. As Liu noted, the Department of Justice literally never talked to the limo driver again, and the woman who "got her head blown" off's death was never investigated by anyone at all - despite police suspicion it might be a homicide.

    Finally Mike notes that Trump's DoJ under Bondi has been caught tracking the searches of US Congress members who have sought access to the "unredacted" but still redacted Epstein Files. It is presently unclear why the Trump regime is engaged in active and almost certainly illegal surveillance of Congress members exercising their rights as enshrined by the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law, but you can bet there ain't an innocent reason for this actual McCarthyist bullshit either. Also, while it's not super important I would like to once again remind you that Trump, the man accused in an FBI witness report of raping a girl who ended up murdered, literally said this particular Epstein Files release "exonerated him."

    Folks as complicated as the Epstein story is, the coverup behind it isn't complicated at all. Trump's DoJ is breaking the law to protect Epstein's rich friends, including Donald Trump, and it doesn't take a fucking genius to figure out why they'd be doing that. The entire Trump administration is effectively a criminal enterprise, run by a rich pedo rapist with dirt on everyone.

    #Epstein #EpsteinFiles #FBI #Trump #DepartmentOfJustice #PamBondi #MikeFigueredo #TheHumanistReport #Coverup #BelieveWomen

    #epsteinfiles #alandershowitz #inthefiles #epsteinlist #metoo #tedliu
  12. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    By now regular readers will know that I never drop allegations without proof, so let's look at this short (18m) video by Coffeezilla for incontrovertible evidence that the very same Justice Department that just declared the Epstein case closed for lack of evidence to charge anyone, has actively avoided even interviewing Epstein ring survivors victimized and sexually assaulted by Epstein and or his associates; despite efforts by those survivors to tell their stories and help the DoJ bring their abusers to justice. I don't like sharing a lot of videos because most people can read faster than a YouTuber talks, but I think there's definitely some value in watching film of Pam Bondi and Kash Patel throwing temper tantrums while Epstein survivors, the actual victims in these horrible crimes, bravely risk public exposure to prove Trump's Justice Department is covering up for, and refusing to prosecute rapists, pedophiles, and human traffickers. If you're in a rush, the part we're looking for starts at 4:06 in the video; but given its such a short presentation overall and Coffeezilla confirms a bunch of the shady and illegal things I've told you the Bondi and the Justice Department are doing to protect Trump in the rest of the video, it's probably worth watching the whole thing.

    youtube.com/watch?v=wPy063-vd1

    Is this a joke to them?

    "It's astonishing to hear someone say, we have no credible evidence on other perpetrators, only to learn you never talked to the women who were allegedly trafficked." - Coffeezilla

    If you only watched the clip from 4:06 forward, you will have seen at least nine different survivors and victims called to stand up and demonstrate by a show of hands how many of them have not been able to meet with Trump's Department of Justice to provide testimony and evidence, and how many of them have tried to offer to provide testimony in evidence. In footage from Pam Bondi's House Oversight hearing this week that is utterly damning, each and every single survivor indicated that they hadn't been able to meet with anyone from the DoJ, and they had all tried to do so to provide testimony and evidence. As Coffeezilla notes, this is the very same government and Department of Justice that wants you to believe they were tracking down every single lead in the Epstein case and just couldn't come up with enough evidence to charge anyone but Epstein or Maxwell; despite the fact that we know the Epstein ring had over a thousand victims, via the Justice Department's own press releases. While neither Coffeezilla, nor Congresswoman Jayapal went so far as it say it out loud, I think most people would agree that given all the other evidence Trump's Department of Justice (both of them) and FBI (both of them) were actively helping cover up all these heinous atrocities, the Injustice Department's *refusal* to meet with Epstein victims and survivors isn't incompetence, it's an intentional part of the ongoing coverup we're all watching in real time.

    Which makes a nice little segue into the rest of the video, which is about how the Trump regime's coverup of the Epstein scandal is so half-assed and brazen, the regime might as well be laughing in our faces - like Trump commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, who not only brazenly lied about never associating with Epstein but can't stop chuckling like a hyena every time Epstein's name comes up. Other topics covered include the Justice Department's multiple waves of illegal redactions, a poll showing 94% of respondents believe Epstein was running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men even if the FBI is lying to say he wasn't, evidence in the files implicating former Barclays boss and former JP Morgan banker Jes Staley in activities that prove FBI Director Kash Patel perjured himself, Pam Bondi's meltdowns during the oversight hearings, and some more of the revelations coming out of the latest "Epstein Files" release that make it clear Epstein was more than just a child rapist. Including at least some evidence of Epstein's connection to the CIA.

    #Epstein #Trump #PamBondi #DepartmentOfJustice #FBI #KashPatel #InTheFiles #JesStaley #EpsteinList #CIA #Coverup #GOP #HowardLutnick #PorkReich

    #epstein #trump #pambondi #departmentofjustice #fbi #kashpatel
  13. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    As I mentioned above, after viewing a tiny fraction the supposedly unredacted, but still heavily redacted "Epstein Files," Congressman Ro Khanna read the names of six prominent businessmen redacted from the Justice Department's releases that definitely do not comply with the Epstein Act law. Furthermore, while many outlets reporting on this are going out of their way to remind you that being in the files doesn't mean these six men are guilty of any crimes, Khanna, the man who actually saw the unredacted files, said they were "likely incriminated."

    Given that one of the key themes that allowed Epstein and his billionaire buddies to keep abusing women and girls for so long is society-wide refusal to name names, I appreciate Khanna's efforts to expose at least *some* of the rich monsters the Department of Justice is protecting, and we should absolutely name those names here in this thread as well.

    commondreams.org/news/khanna-n

    Khanna Names 6 Men ‘Likely Incriminated’ by Epstein Files That ‘DOJ Hid for No Apparent Reason’

    “Yesterday, Congressman [Thomas] Massie [R-Ky.] and I went to the Department of Justice to read the unredacted Epstein files,” Khanna (Calif.) said. “We spent about two hours there, and we learned that 70 to 80% of the files are still redacted.”

    “In fact, there were six wealthy, powerful men that the DOJ hid for no apparent reason,” the congressman continued. “When Congressman Massie and I pointed this out to the DOJ, they acknowledged their mistake, and now they have revealed the identity of these six powerful men.”

    “These men are: Salvatore Nuara; Zurab Mikeladze; Leonic Leonov; Nicola Caputo; Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, CEO of Dubai Ports World; and billionaire businessman Leslie Wexner, who was labeled as a ‘co-conspirator,’ by the FBI.” Khanna said.

    “Now my question is: Why did it take Thomas Massie and me going to the Justice Department to get these six men’s identities to become public?” Khanna asked. “And if we found six men that they were hiding in two hours, imagine how many men they are covering up for in those three million files.”

    Personally, I think Khanna is being far too charitable to call even these redactions by Trump's Injustice Department a mistake, especially given that the Congressman has already acknowledged we have clear evidence the DoJ is breaking the Epstein Act law to cover up the entire scandal and prominent individual's ties to it. More importantly, Khanna's question isn't political maneuvering but a relevant and disturbing quivery. If he found six men "likely incriminated" in two hours of highly restricted access, it's certain that there are a lot more wealthy and powerful people "likely incriminated" in the rest of the 3.5M files; which again, are just the ones Trump's lying minions at the Justice Department are willing to release. How many more names are they holding back in the 3M files they still refuse to publish despite being required by law?

    As for the six men specifically named by Khanna on the House floor, we know who four of them are already.

    newrepublic.com/post/206411/ro

    Ro Khanna Reads Out Names of Six “Powerful Men” in Epstein Files

    "Former Victoria’s Secret CEO Les Wexner was revealed as a possible co-conspirator of sex predator Jeffrey Epstein in a 2019 FBI document, even as FBI Director Kash Patel claimed under oath last year that the agency had no knowledge of any other sex traffickers in the Epstein files. And the UAE’s Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem was identified as the recipient of the “I loved the torture video” email from Epstein. The sultan’s name was initially redacted.

    As for the other men—Salvatore Nuara is rumored to be a former NYPD contact from Epstein’s black book. The most notable, Nicola Caputo, is a former European Parliament member. Little is publicly known about Mikeladze and Leonov."

    Naturally, we have no idea how much effort Trump's first term Department of Justice put into investigating any of these men in the files, but as we'll discover later in the thread - there's no reason to believe a DoJ that hasn't even interviewed dozens of Epstein survivors who attended yesterday's oversight hearing on Capital Hill was putting its best foot forward to bring the Epstein ring to justice, even back in 2019 when Trump was also President.

    Finally, I'd ask readers to note the part of Khanna's statements into the record that received very little attention compared to the six names he exposed.

    “It’s time to begin with accountability for the Epstein class,” Khanna said during his remarks Tuesday. “Hold them in front of Congress, those people who visited the island or did business with Epstein after he was a convicted pedophile. Investigate them. Prosecute them. And let us return to democratic accountability in the United States of America.”

    In other words: It is not the government's job, to protect rich child rapists OR their friends. Even if they happen to be President.

    #Epstein #EpsteinFiles #InTheFiles #RoKhanna #DoJ #Coverup #GOP #Trump

    #epstein #epsteinfiles #inthefiles #rokhanna #doj #coverup
  14. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Alright, I think we've established that the Trump-controlled Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, and FBI Director Kash Patel, is actively breaking the law to protect US President Donald Trump. Frankly, I think you can go a lot further than that, but for now I just want to focus on the Swine Emperor, because if the Justice Department is willing to break the law to protect Trump, the question becomes - from what, are minions like Bondi and Blanche actually protecting the president?

    Well, thanks to the roughly one million (that is not a typo) times the Department of Justice has redacted Donald Trump's name from the files, we cannot as of yet catalogue the full extent of the evidence against Downmarket Mussolini. But even in the 3.5M *redacted* files the Justice Department released this month (while still holding back somewhere around 3M files illegally) we can find some highly-incriminating, if not utterly damning evidence that the President of the United States is a pedophile rapist who did a lot more than party with Jeff Epstein.

    rawstory.com/trump-epstein-267

    Witness told FBI Trump threatened to ‘disappear’ girl and have her ‘whole family killed’

    "Under penalty of perjury, a witness told the FBI back in 2016 that they had “personally witnessed” President Donald Trump threaten to “disappear” a girl and have her entire family killed, according to a document released by the Justice Department on Friday.

    Released as part of the DOJ’s publication of around 3.5 million files on Jeffrey Epstein, the FBI tip was submitted by an individual using the pseudonym “Tiffany Doe,” and includes details of an alleged threat Trump made to a plaintiff in a lawsuit.

    “I personally witnessed Defendant Trump telling Plaintiff that she shouldn’t ever say anything if she didn’t want to disappear like the 12-year-old female [redacted], and that he was capable of having her whole family killed,” the FBI tip reads, signed under penalty of perjury on June 18, 2016."

    Okay, pay close attention now because there's some fuckery afoot. First, Raw Story is being coy here because based on the dates provided, we know the sworn account in this document comes out of the Katie Johnson lawsuit against Trump. Johnson, as you might remember, was the woman suing Trump back in 2016, who provided graphic testimony accusing both Donald Trump, and Jeff Epstein of sexually assaulting her as part of a pedophile human trafficking ring when she was 13 years old. This then means that far from being just a tipster, Tiffany Doe is the same anonymous witness who corroborated the testimony Johnson herself provided in her sworn affidavit (and as you'll see later on in this thread, a recorded witness interview). As you may recall, Johnson dropped her suit before the 2016 election after her lawyer said she'd received threats and was too scared to proceed; hardly an outrageous position given we have two people saying in sworn testimony that Trump threatened to murder her and her whole family if she ever talked - and he was now on the verge of becoming President.

    Which then brings us to the fact that in addition to underselling the Katie Johnson lawsuit this document comes out of, Raw Story also buried the lede.

    “I was personally threatened by Mr. Epstein that I would be killed and my family killed as well if I ever disclosed any of the physical and sexual abuse of minor females that I had personally witnessed by Mr. Epstein or any of his guests,” the FBI tip reads.

    “I am coming forward to swear to the truthfulness of the physical and sexual abuse that I personally witnessed of minor females at the hands of Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein, including the Plaintiff, during the time of my employment from the years of 1990-2000 for Mr. Epstein.”

    So, you caught that right? Tiffany Doe just told the FBI under penalty of perjury, that she personally witnessed both Trump and Epstein sexually abuse underage girls while working for Epstein. In addition to the death threats. Please keep in mind this is the very same release of Department of Justice files, Trump himself declared "completely exonerated" him.

    Finally, you may notice this specific file has been removed from the DoJ records available to the public, but I assure you it was there and it's just one of the many incriminating documents Trump's crooked Injustice Department removed after the media noticed them. As for why they thought it would be fine to release in the first place, I can't say, but I suspect Trump and his minions believe they already beat Katie Johnson's accusations. And they're largely right; because American corporate media ignored the sworn testimony of two women prepared to go to jail if they're lying, and assumed a future GOP Presidential Nominee raping a 13 year old girl wasn't a believable story. I wonder if they still feel that way now, millions of Epstein files later?

    #Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #FBI #KatieJohnson #EpsteinFiles

    #epstein #trump #inthefiles #epsteinlist #fbi #katiejohnson
  15. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."

    First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?

    Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.

    newrepublic.com/post/206435/ra

    Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times

    "Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.

    “The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.

    “To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.

    “If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."

    Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.

    Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.

    "The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."

    Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.

    #Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin

    #epstein #trump #inthefiles #epsteinlist #departmentofjustice #coverup
  16. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."

    First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?

    Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.

    newrepublic.com/post/206435/ra

    Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times

    "Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.

    “The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.

    “To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.

    “If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."

    Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.

    Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.

    "The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."

    Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.

    #Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin

    #epstein #trump #inthefiles #epsteinlist #departmentofjustice #coverup
  17. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."

    First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?

    Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.

    newrepublic.com/post/206435/ra

    Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times

    "Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.

    “The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.

    “To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.

    “If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."

    Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.

    Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.

    "The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."

    Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.

    #Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin

    #epstein #trump #inthefiles #epsteinlist #departmentofjustice #coverup
  18. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    So, what exactly did I mean when I said Trump's name has been *heavily* and illegally redacted from the Department of Justice's Epstein files? Well, let's start with "heavily" and work our way towards "illegally."

    First of all, how many times do you think Trump's name appears in the redacted version of the so-called "Epstein Files" the Department of Justice compiled on this case? You can be forgiven for answering "I don't know" because both the Republican Party, and a complicit corporate media have treated this figure like a state secret, but the reality is that even in the redacted version of the files, Trump's name appears something like 38,000 times. A number which partisan fascist hacks and propagandists have simultaneously both blamed on Trump's own first term DoJ investigation into Epstein, and held up as evidence that Trump's name couldn't possibly be one of the names being redacted to protect rich child rapists because his name already appeared so many times. You following all that nonsense?

    Good, now just take a guess how many times Trump's name actually appeared when Representative Jamie Raskin typed in the president's name while viewing the (partially) "unredacted" Epstein Files. If you guessed literally over a *million* times, you win a gold star.

    newrepublic.com/post/206435/ra

    Raskin: Trump Is in Unredacted Epstein Files More Than a Million Times

    "Representative Jamie Raskin has claimed that President Trump is named over a million times in the unredacted Epstein files.

    “The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous,” he told Axios Tuesday, after viewing the unredacted files a day earlier. “I mean, there’s tons of redacted stuff.… And [Trump’s] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it’s all over the place.

    “To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup,” Raskin continued.

    “If this is true, it would mean the Department of Justice redacted more than 96% of the mentions of Trump,” MS NOW’s Matt Fuller wrote."

    Folks, you could write an entire five hundred page nonfiction book about Donald Trump, and not type Trump's name over a million times. For comparison, I found it deeply incriminating that Vladimir Putin's name reportedly appears in the redacted version of the Epstein Files on 1,056 documents; similarly there have been widespread calls for Bari Weiss's pro-Trump CBS to shitcan longevity quack Peter Attia after he appeared in the "Epstein Files" over 1,700 times. At over a million appearances, it's no longer fair to say Trump appears in the Epstein Files - a more accurate analysis would be that Donald Trump is indeed one of the main characters in the Epstein Files instead. The files are about Trump, as much as they are about anyone besides perhaps Epstein himself.

    Okay, with that established, let's turn back to the Common Dreams article by Stephen Prager I posted above, to see what kind of redactions the Department of Justice is legally allowed to make according to the Epstein Act Trump himself signed into law.

    "The law passed in November requiring the files’ release mandates that victims of Epstein’s abuse have their privacy protected, but forbids the DOJ from redacting information to protect prominent individuals, including government officials, from embarrassment."

    Look folks, I'm not a rocket scientist but I don't think the Epstein Act leaves a lot of ambiguity for Pam Bondi to work with here; she's legally required to redact identifying information of *victims* of the Epstein ring, and legally forbidden from redacting the identities of Epstein associates, co-conspirators, or government officials. Which of course brings us back to a pretty simple question - is the Department of Justice claiming Trump was an abuse victim of the Epstein Ring? Because if they're not, they just broke the law somewhere in the range of a million times to protect their child rapist Führer.

    #Epstein #Trump #InTheFiles #EpsteinList #DepartmentOfJustice #Coverup #PamBondi #PeterAttia #Putin

    #putin #peterattia #pambondi #coverup #departmentofjustice #epsteinlist
  19. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    I guess while I'm proving damning allegations I made in the thread above, we should take a quick look at some of Elon Musk's correspondence with noted pedophile human trafficker Jeff Epstein. In my head, I've been kind of keeping a distinction between people who are "in the files" plotting with Epstein, and people who would be on a hypothetical "Epstein list" of co-conspirators in criminal activities like sexual assault, pedophilia, kidnapping, human trafficking, violent abuse, maybe murder, but also financial crimes to hide the transactions involved in all the monstrous shit Epstein and friends were up to; the kinda stuff you're supposed to go to jail for. As you'll see below, Elon Musk is the man in between those two categories because even though I can't really prove he raped anybody, his sheer thirst to party with a known pedophile blackmailer, on his pedophile island where all the pedophile and other rapey shit happened, brings up some awkward questions.

    futurism.com/future-society/el

    Elon Musk Emailed Extensively With Jeffrey Epstein, Asking to Visit His Notorious Island

    "Even more damningly in December 2012, Musk sent an email practically begging Epstein for an invitation to some debauchery.

    “Do you have any parties planned? I’ve been working to the edge of sanity this year and so, once my kids head home after Christmas, I really want to hit the party scene in St Barts or elsewhere and let loose,” Musk wrote. He added that “a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what I’m looking for.”

    Now look, I'm sure Musk's lawyers can come up with a million completely innocent reasons why the above email doesn't meant anything, and legally speaking, they're probably right. By that same measure however, I'm not an idiot. Epstein was first convicted for pedo rapey stuff in 2008, long after rumors and allegations of such were being published in semi-mainstream media sources. By 2012, everyone knew that Epstein Island was the place where the pedo rapey sex parties happened, and Musk isn't very good at subtlety. I'm not telling anyone what to think, but I think comments like "let loose," and “a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what I’m looking for" clearly imply Musk wanted to attend an Epstein party, and Epstein parties were even then infamous for pedo rapey shit. I certainly can't prove it, but Musk can't sue me for having an opinion.

    As the article notes, Musk spent multiple Decembers, trying to get an invite to Epstein Island, or otherwise meet with the again, infamous pedophile rapist human trafficker and blackmailer, Jeff Epstein. Musk emailed again in 2013, and Epstein apparently schedule something for Musk with his secretary for January 2nd, 2014. But their plans fell through at the last minute. This recorded desire to meet however, was apparently mutual, as in emails from both 2012, and 2013, it was Epstein extending the invitation to Musk, albeit with far less self incriminating language.

    "Those were far from the only times the pair made plans. In April 2013, Epstein asked Musk if he’d be around to have “dinner with woody allen and crowd at my house,” referring to the influential filmmaker and actor who’s also been accused of child sex abuse. Musk replied that he “might be in town.”

    Epstein also invited Musk to his island in September 2012, recommending he “bring your friend or friends.”

    “Sounds good,” Musk wrote, “I will try to make it.”

    Finally, while it's not definitive, circumstantial evidence from other Epstein files mentioning Elon Musk, at least strongly imply the pair did in fact get together, likely on Epstein Island or very near it, at some point - likely Christmas 2013, and possibly even again in December 2014.

    "And at least one email suggests the two had actually gotten together at one point. In September 2014, Epstein asked Elon, “are=you planning to do st barth again for xmas?” (St. Barth is Saint Barthélemy, where Musk has reportedly vacationed in the past.)

    In December 2014, a Google Calendar alert titled “ELON MUSK TO ISLAND DEC. 6TH” appeared in the inbox of Groff, Epstein’s assistant."

    As you'll see later on in this ongoing discussion, many analysts looking at the Epstein file releases, seem to believe that Elon Musk wasn't really one of the cool kids in the Epstein billionaire influence pedaling ring; that Epstein saw Musk as a means to gain access to other billionaire tech bro shitlords, more than as a peer. We also don't have any evidence he was one of the Epstein/Maxwell 10 criminal co-conspirators the FBI was tracking down in 2019. What I think we do know however, is that Elon certainly wanted to be one of the cool kids, and that desire extended as far as wanting to attend an Epstein Island party - for purely relaxational and not at all molestery purposes, I'm sure.

    Finally, please keep in mind that due to his involvement with DOGE, Musk is indeed also another Trump regime official in the Epstein files.

    #Epstein #Trump #Musk #InTheFiles #EpsteinFiles

    #epstein #trump #musk #inthefiles #epsteinfiles
  20. AnarchoNinaAnalyzes @[email protected] ·

    Frankly speaking, I simply don't have the time to go deep on every aspect of the Epstein scandal, and the various rich maggot abusers involved in it. As numerous observers speaking about the Epstein scandal have noted however, just because the Department of Justice refuses to provide a formal list of Epstein associates accused of sexual abuse and various other crimes, doesn't mean we can't make one ourselves from the men (and some women) in the Epstein disclosures. So, as we go along, I'm going to throw out some background articles about the folks who are definitely "on the Epstein list" even if Pam Bondi never complied that list in the first place.

    Let's start with American private equity investor, Leon Black - a man who apparently gave Jeff Epstein 158M dollars because he was just that amazing of a financial advisor, or so Black has asked us to believe.

    hyperallergic.com/epstein-file

    Epstein Files Detail Gruesome Allegations Against Leon Black

    "The latest tranche of Epstein files released by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) last week includes detailed and gruesome descriptions of alleged abuse by private equity billionaire and Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) trustee Leon Black.

    The trove of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein includes scanned pages of an apparent diary containing first-person accounts of alleged abuse as well as emails describing accusations against Black.

    Certain details expressed in the spiral-bound notebook, including the year, location, and perpetrators of the alleged abuse, correspond to a 2023 lawsuit alleging that the billionaire raped a 16-year-old girl who has autism and a rare form of Down Syndrome in Epstein’s Manhattan residence in 2002. According to court filings, at the time, the girl’s developmental age was estimated to be 12 years old. The lawsuit is ongoing, and the woman, known as Jane Doe, recently fired her attorney."

    Look, for both our sanity I'm not going to get into the gory details, but Black stands accused of both assaulting, and raping, minor victims who were provided to him by Jeff Epstein, the guy he paid $158M too. As is typical in these cases, Black's attorneys have denied everything but given the similarity of witness testimony, I personally see no reason to believe them. These are however once again, not rumors - these allegations emerged from a US Department of Justice investigation, and multiple lawsuits against Black by Epstein victims.

    As always, I recommend hitting up the Wikipedia page of pretty much everyone listed in the Epstein files, for more information - you'd be surprised at how much dirt is already in the wind, on guys like Leon Black.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Bla

    #Epstein #EpsteinFiles #LeonBlack #Classwar #InTheFiles #EpsteinList

    #epstein #epsteinfiles #leonblack #classwar #inthefiles #epsteinlist