home.social

#interfere — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #interfere, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. #interfere : to prevent from continuing or being carried out

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Try our new word guessing game @ 24hippos.com

  2. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Try our new word guessing game @ 24hippos.com

  3. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Try our new word guessing game @ 24hippos.com

  4. Wednesday, November 26, 2025

    Witkoff promised Russian aides he could sway Trump, pressure Ukraine into peace deal in secret phone recording -- HUR exposes foreign-made backbone of Russia’s Shahed-107 drone striking Ukraine’s front line -- Drones strike Russia’s Cheboksary, reports say electronic warfare plant hit again -- Ukraine reportedly destroys 2 Russian aircraft, including rare A-60 laser platform ... and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  5. Wednesday, November 26, 2025

    Witkoff promised Russian aides he could sway Trump, pressure Ukraine into peace deal in secret phone recording -- HUR exposes foreign-made backbone of Russia’s Shahed-107 drone striking Ukraine’s front line -- Drones strike Russia’s Cheboksary, reports say electronic warfare plant hit again -- Ukraine reportedly destroys 2 Russian aircraft, including rare A-60 laser platform ... and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  6. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Try our new word guessing game @ 24hippos.com

  7. Tuesday, August 19, 2025

    Russia occupied less than 1% of Ukraine’s territory since November 2022, monitoring group says — Russian media shows US armored vehicle with Russian, American flags storming Ukrainian positions — Russian gasoline prices hit record highs after drone strikes shut refineries — Muscle beaches, drag racing, and drones falling into the sea. Summer in Odesa hasn’t stopped — In Ukraine, democracy finds its fiercest defenders … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  8. Tuesday, August 19, 2025

    Russia occupied less than 1% of Ukraine’s territory since November 2022, monitoring group says — Russian media shows US armored vehicle with Russian, American flags storming Ukrainian positions — Russian gasoline prices hit record highs after drone strikes shut refineries — Muscle beaches, drag racing, and drones falling into the sea. Summer in Odesa hasn’t stopped — In Ukraine, democracy finds its fiercest defenders … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  9. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  10. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  11. @cykonot

    Many nations could interfere in Musk's businesses for inteferring in their voting.

    Many many countries, many many many more citizens could.

    #musk #fadcist #interfere #manipulation #subversion #NaziSpy

  12. @cykonot

    Many nations could interfere in Musk's businesses for inteferring in their voting.

    Many many countries, many many many more citizens could.

    #musk #fadcist #interfere #manipulation #subversion #NaziSpy

  13. 
Judge #Aileen M. #Cannon’s stunning dismissal this week of the most serious charges faced by Donald Trump put her on shaky legal ground, according to experts,

    who say she is🔸 on track to be reversed on appeal
    🔸 and could even be removed from the case
    — an extraordinary, but not unheard of step.
    
Because of the political calendar, however, any legal repercussions could be short-lived.
    
Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified national security records and obstruction of government efforts to retrieve the material
    🔸may not matter if the former president and current Republican nominee is elected in November.

    If he gets back to the White House, Trump could pressure his Justice Department to close the case.

    He could also promote Cannon to the very appeals court that will soon examine her decision to toss the case.

Cannon’s finding that special counsel #Jack #Smith was improperly appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Trump
    conflicts with numerous past court decisions and the nation’s long history
    — during both Democratic and Republican administrations
    — of allowing #independent #prosecutors to handle high-profile instances of alleged wrongdoing.


⭐️Smith has filed notice of his plans to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit,
    which reviews decisions from the Florida district where Cannon,
    a relatively inexperienced judge appointed by Trump in 2020, sits.

    ⭐️The court has already rebuked her twice for her handling of other aspects of the classified documents case,
    sending what Yale Law School professor Akhil Amar described as a message that her decisions had been “way out of line.”
    
The question now, Amar said, is
    💥how quickly and dramatically the appeals court acts on the latest ruling, 💥
    which dismissed the entire indictment for Trump and his two co-defendants.
    
“They may not want to stick their head in a #buzz #saw if they can just let the case take its slow, deliberative course,” he said.
    
In her 93-page decision, Cannon said there is no specific statute authorizing the attorney general to appoint a special counsel.

    She also said the Constitution requires someone with Smith’s authority to be confirmed by the Senate.
    
The judge acknowledged the tradition of special-attorney-like figures in moments of political scandal involving high-level government officials,
    from #Watergate to #Iran-#contra to Russia’s attempts to #interfere in the 2016 election.
    
But Cannon said the practice of appointing such independent prosecutors has been inconsistent and based on a “spotty historical backdrop.”

    Smith, she wrote, is “a private citizen exercising the full power of a United States Attorney, and with very little oversight or supervision.”

    Conservative legal groups have long questioned the constitutionality of special counsel appointments.

    Cannon repeatedly cited Justice #Clarence #Thomas, who raised the issue in a solo opinion this month as part of the Supreme Court’s decision granting Trump broad immunity from prosecution for official acts.

    That Supreme Court case focused on Smith’s separate election interference prosecution of Trump in D.C.

    She also embraced the arguments in a law review article by #Gary #Lawson of Boston University School of Law and #Steven G. #Calabresi, a Northwestern law professor and 🔸a co-founder of the Federalist Society, with which Cannon is affiliated.
    
Other legal experts, however, have joined former Justice Department officials and Smith’s legal team in saying
    her ruling ignores the history of special counsel appointments and flouts Supreme Court precedent.
    
Most notably, the high court in 1974 unanimously required President Richard M. #Nixon to hand over recordings to a special prosecutor as part of the #Watergate investigation.

    In that opinion, the justices endorsed the office, citing several statutes under which the attorney general had
    “delegated the authority to represent the United States in these particular matters to a Special Prosecutor with unique authority and tenure.”
    
While lower-court judges are bound to follow the Supreme Court’s lead,
    🔸Cannon took the unusual step of finding she was not required to abide by that aspect of the high court’s opinion in U.S. v. Nixon,
    🔸saying the case did not directly address the validity of the office of special counsel.

    Michael J. Gerhardt, a University of North Carolina law professor who teaches about constitutional conflicts between presidents and Congress, said
    Cannon cannot just brush aside a unanimous high court ruling.
    
“For a trial judge to ignore it is judicial malpractice,” he said, describing her most recent decision as
    part of a “pattern of bias that leads her to endorse wacky or unfounded arguments,
    and that’s a problem if you’re a judge.”
    washingtonpost.com/politics/20

  14. 
Judge #Aileen M. #Cannon’s stunning dismissal this week of the most serious charges faced by Donald Trump put her on shaky legal ground, according to experts,

    who say she is🔸 on track to be reversed on appeal
    🔸 and could even be removed from the case
    — an extraordinary, but not unheard of step.
    
Because of the political calendar, however, any legal repercussions could be short-lived.
    
Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified national security records and obstruction of government efforts to retrieve the material
    🔸may not matter if the former president and current Republican nominee is elected in November.

    If he gets back to the White House, Trump could pressure his Justice Department to close the case.

    He could also promote Cannon to the very appeals court that will soon examine her decision to toss the case.

Cannon’s finding that special counsel #Jack #Smith was improperly appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Trump
    conflicts with numerous past court decisions and the nation’s long history
    — during both Democratic and Republican administrations
    — of allowing #independent #prosecutors to handle high-profile instances of alleged wrongdoing.


⭐️Smith has filed notice of his plans to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit,
    which reviews decisions from the Florida district where Cannon,
    a relatively inexperienced judge appointed by Trump in 2020, sits.

    ⭐️The court has already rebuked her twice for her handling of other aspects of the classified documents case,
    sending what Yale Law School professor Akhil Amar described as a message that her decisions had been “way out of line.”
    
The question now, Amar said, is
    💥how quickly and dramatically the appeals court acts on the latest ruling, 💥
    which dismissed the entire indictment for Trump and his two co-defendants.
    
“They may not want to stick their head in a #buzz #saw if they can just let the case take its slow, deliberative course,” he said.
    
In her 93-page decision, Cannon said there is no specific statute authorizing the attorney general to appoint a special counsel.

    She also said the Constitution requires someone with Smith’s authority to be confirmed by the Senate.
    
The judge acknowledged the tradition of special-attorney-like figures in moments of political scandal involving high-level government officials,
    from #Watergate to #Iran-#contra to Russia’s attempts to #interfere in the 2016 election.
    
But Cannon said the practice of appointing such independent prosecutors has been inconsistent and based on a “spotty historical backdrop.”

    Smith, she wrote, is “a private citizen exercising the full power of a United States Attorney, and with very little oversight or supervision.”

    Conservative legal groups have long questioned the constitutionality of special counsel appointments.

    Cannon repeatedly cited Justice #Clarence #Thomas, who raised the issue in a solo opinion this month as part of the Supreme Court’s decision granting Trump broad immunity from prosecution for official acts.

    That Supreme Court case focused on Smith’s separate election interference prosecution of Trump in D.C.

    She also embraced the arguments in a law review article by #Gary #Lawson of Boston University School of Law and #Steven G. #Calabresi, a Northwestern law professor and 🔸a co-founder of the Federalist Society, with which Cannon is affiliated.
    
Other legal experts, however, have joined former Justice Department officials and Smith’s legal team in saying
    her ruling ignores the history of special counsel appointments and flouts Supreme Court precedent.
    
Most notably, the high court in 1974 unanimously required President Richard M. #Nixon to hand over recordings to a special prosecutor as part of the #Watergate investigation.

    In that opinion, the justices endorsed the office, citing several statutes under which the attorney general had
    “delegated the authority to represent the United States in these particular matters to a Special Prosecutor with unique authority and tenure.”
    
While lower-court judges are bound to follow the Supreme Court’s lead,
    🔸Cannon took the unusual step of finding she was not required to abide by that aspect of the high court’s opinion in U.S. v. Nixon,
    🔸saying the case did not directly address the validity of the office of special counsel.

    Michael J. Gerhardt, a University of North Carolina law professor who teaches about constitutional conflicts between presidents and Congress, said
    Cannon cannot just brush aside a unanimous high court ruling.
    
“For a trial judge to ignore it is judicial malpractice,” he said, describing her most recent decision as
    part of a “pattern of bias that leads her to endorse wacky or unfounded arguments,
    and that’s a problem if you’re a judge.”
    washingtonpost.com/politics/20

  15. #Merchan: “Such concerns will undoubtedly #interfere w/the fair administration of #justice & constitutes a direct attack on the #RuleOfLaw itself. Again, all citizens, called upon to participate in these proceedings, whether as a #juror, a #witness, or in some other capacity, must now concern themselves not only w/their own personal #safety, but w/the safety & the potential for personal attacks upon their loved ones. That reality cannot be overstated.”

    #law #Trump #ObstructionOfJustice

  16. #Merchan: “Such concerns will undoubtedly #interfere w/the fair administration of #justice & constitutes a direct attack on the #RuleOfLaw itself. Again, all citizens, called upon to participate in these proceedings, whether as a #juror, a #witness, or in some other capacity, must now concern themselves not only w/their own personal #safety, but w/the safety & the potential for personal attacks upon their loved ones. That reality cannot be overstated.”

    #law #Trump #ObstructionOfJustice

  17. This is a barely-veiled call for #Trump's supporters to #intimidate #voters and poll workers. He's hoping a #J6-like #mob shows up at #polling locations to #interfere with #voting and cause #chaos. Trump will then use the chaos he himself incited to claim the vote counts can't be trusted. How many time do we have to watch this asshole make the same play?

    themessenger.com/politics/trum

  18. This is a barely-veiled call for #Trump's supporters to #intimidate #voters and poll workers. He's hoping a #J6-like #mob shows up at #polling locations to #interfere with #voting and cause #chaos. Trump will then use the chaos he himself incited to claim the vote counts can't be trusted. How many time do we have to watch this asshole make the same play?

    themessenger.com/politics/trum

  19. #Academics & #government #scientists say the campaign also is successfully throttling the years-long effort to #study #online #falsehoods, which grew after #Russian attempts to #interfere in the 2016 #election caught both #SocialMedia sites & politicians unawares.
    
Interviews w/ >2 dozen professors, government officials, #physicians, #nonprofits & #research funders… describe an escalating campaign emerging as #online #propaganda is rising.

  20. #Academics & #government #scientists say the campaign also is successfully throttling the years-long effort to #study #online #falsehoods, which grew after #Russian attempts to #interfere in the 2016 #election caught both #SocialMedia sites & politicians unawares.
    
Interviews w/ >2 dozen professors, government officials, #physicians, #nonprofits & #research funders… describe an escalating campaign emerging as #online #propaganda is rising.

  21. #ElonMusk is a #traitor and a #warCriminal who decided to disable #Ukraine's use of #Starlink in an intentional effort to #interfere with a planned #attack on #Russia's forces in the Crimean peninsula. #Musk is openly sympathetic to Russia, and their illegal war against Ukraine, and he believes he has the authority and mandate to interfere whenever he feels like it. Rather than accept responsibility, he's trying to blame Joe #Biden for the choices he made all by himself.

    businessinsider.com/elon-musk-

  22. #ElonMusk is a #traitor and a #warCriminal who decided to disable #Ukraine's use of #Starlink in an intentional effort to #interfere with a planned #attack on #Russia's forces in the Crimean peninsula. #Musk is openly sympathetic to Russia, and their illegal war against Ukraine, and he believes he has the authority and mandate to interfere whenever he feels like it. Rather than accept responsibility, he's trying to blame Joe #Biden for the choices he made all by himself.

    businessinsider.com/elon-musk-

  23. If #Meadows were to succeed in changing #venues, he would widen the pool of potential #jurors, who could come from more #conservative areas outside #Atlanta, & he would avoid having his trial #televised. He would also set a bad #precedent, encouraging future presidents & their aides to #interfere in the administration of local #elections, w/the expectation that they could later claim they were acting in their official capacities & secure more favorable circumstances at any #trial.

    #law #legal

  24. If #Meadows were to succeed in changing #venues, he would widen the pool of potential #jurors, who could come from more #conservative areas outside #Atlanta, & he would avoid having his trial #televised. He would also set a bad #precedent, encouraging future presidents & their aides to #interfere in the administration of local #elections, w/the expectation that they could later claim they were acting in their official capacities & secure more favorable circumstances at any #trial.

    #law #legal

  25. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  26. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  27. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  28. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  29. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  30. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  31. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form

  32. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Learn more languages @ wordofthehour.org/r/more

  33. #interfere : to strike one foot against the opposite foot or ankle in using the legs

    - French: interfère

    - German: stört

    - Portuguese: interfirir

    - Spanish: interfiere

    ------------

    Word of The Hour's Annual Survey @ wordofthehour.org/r/form