#individualisation — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #individualisation, aggregated by home.social.
-
RE: https://sciences.social/@CPCpopulation/116221218684816460
🕒 Come along at 3pm TODAY (UK time) to our #CPCCGWebinar with Julia Behrman of @northwesternu. Julia will explore how shifting norms around having #children, measured through a new #US #surveyexperiment, reveal growing ambiguity and #individualisation in #childbearing expectations. Register to join online - all welcome: https://www.cpc.ac.uk/activities/event_calendar/956/CPC_CG_Webinar__Julia_Behrman
-
RE: https://sciences.social/@CPCpopulation/116221218684816460
🕒 Come along at 3pm TODAY (UK time) to our #CPCCGWebinar with Julia Behrman of @northwesternu. Julia will explore how shifting norms around having #children, measured through a new #US #surveyexperiment, reveal growing ambiguity and #individualisation in #childbearing expectations. Register to join online - all welcome: https://www.cpc.ac.uk/activities/event_calendar/956/CPC_CG_Webinar__Julia_Behrman
-
"Manufactured risks are the product of human activity." Ulrich Beck
" A "risk society"
is a sociological concept describing a stage of modernity where society is increasingly defined by and organized around managing the hazards and insecurities it has produced itself through modernization and industrialization.Self-produced risks: The primary source of risk is not nature, but human actions and the unintended consequences of modernization itself.
Individualization: Individuals are increasingly forced to confront these risks personally, with a greater emphasis on individual choice and responsibility in the face of larger, systemic problems
Ulrich Beck defines it as "a systematic way of dealing with hazards and insecurities induced and introduced by modernisation itself". "
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_society" The Study of Existential Risk
frames the rises and falls of civilisation around the idea of the “Goliath”, a hierarchy that dominates labour and energy through coercion and violence.""Our research shows how there are nascent attempts to embed citizens into decision making by re-plumbing democracy, flattening hierarchies and constructing more dynamic feedback loops that have real consequence."
>>
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/commentisfree/2025/nov/26/climate-disasters-devastating-planet-collective-action-against-corporations
#risks #diy #FossilFuels #energy #extinctions #climate #PlanetaryBoundaries #SafeLimits #guardrails #pollution #waste #catastrophe #ExistentialRisk #ManufacturedRisks #uncertainty #insecurity #individualisation #modernity #crisis #austerity #democracy #indifference -
"Manufactured risks are the product of human activity." Ulrich Beck
" A "risk society"
is a sociological concept describing a stage of modernity where society is increasingly defined by and organized around managing the hazards and insecurities it has produced itself through modernization and industrialization.Self-produced risks: The primary source of risk is not nature, but human actions and the unintended consequences of modernization itself.
Individualization: Individuals are increasingly forced to confront these risks personally, with a greater emphasis on individual choice and responsibility in the face of larger, systemic problems
Ulrich Beck defines it as "a systematic way of dealing with hazards and insecurities induced and introduced by modernisation itself". "
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_society" The Study of Existential Risk
frames the rises and falls of civilisation around the idea of the “Goliath”, a hierarchy that dominates labour and energy through coercion and violence.""Our research shows how there are nascent attempts to embed citizens into decision making by re-plumbing democracy, flattening hierarchies and constructing more dynamic feedback loops that have real consequence."
>>
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/commentisfree/2025/nov/26/climate-disasters-devastating-planet-collective-action-against-corporations
#risks #diy #FossilFuels #energy #extinctions #climate #PlanetaryBoundaries #SafeLimits #guardrails #pollution #waste #catastrophe #ExistentialRisk #ManufacturedRisks #uncertainty #insecurity #individualisation #modernity #crisis #austerity #democracy #indifference -
New📜preprint from the @idealab out today! We propose that epigenetic mechanisms mediate the realization of individualized niches. Furthermore, we suggest that the realization of individualized niches can contribute to both the emergence and maintenance of epigenetic variation. This opinion piece is the result of a large collaboration within the DFG-funded NC³ collaborative research center - A Novel Synthesis of Individualisation across Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution: Niche Choice, Niche Conformance, Niche Construction https://www.uni-bielefeld.de/fakultaeten/biologie/forschung/verbuende/sfb_nc3/ ). It is now available on EcoEvoRxiv: https://doi.org/10.32942/X2Z34V #ecology #evolution #plasticity #epigenetics #individualisation
#AcademicMastodon @academicchatter -
CW: #STEM Problems - incl. most #Tech work and #Techies (is it correct? ✔️❌ ) ❓
STEM is focuses on everything else mostly. not human beings and their feelings.
Is that quite correct? (on first look❓) ✔️❌
That's the TLDR -
:rocket Please boost and comment if I'm wrong or right to get good comments... :rocket
TLDR 2:
#STEM / #Science #Tech #Engineering #Maths is mostly not orientated or considerate of people themselves or their feelings - during or after 'work' (neither the workers who do work or what the work is effecting upon others).
@freemo I've mentioned you here because I feel like you have a good reply for the above distinction (the rest is just extra below but helps give micro-reasons that make the total premis).
Please boost and comment if I'm wrong or right...
I aim to correct as I go or realise why it's ok to ignore people and focus on Tech / STEM... as it seems to be proven or felt already that there is a quick limit to all tech and we reached there around the 2000's ! :)
====================
Further points are "➡️" marked:
The post is here because:
➡️ 1) if things are not for or with them (workers / those effected) in mind then that is a bigger problem than calculating the material things correctly unless really good work is done prior.
➡️ 2) I do care more than the average modern person it seems... about people... and because THEN it solves everything a lot better - even the material world can be solved but not without the people.
(i.e. NOT considering people is almost always worse / ignorant / feeding colder people / bastards / #Musk)
:win3_pbrush: I'm painting STEM it seems with 1 brush... 🖌️
BUT if you agree "STEM" itself is a grouped term of similar brushes quite deliberately similar because they do not include the people stuff first (or at all) then that similarly find that critical and a direct result of the problems and perspectives of that.➡️ IF doing anything human orientated and anything to do with humans / humanity then those people's thoughts or even participation is needed in some way / level. Never near-0%.
IF it was much high like 50% then I could accept it a lot more.Not being too extreme here but
➡️ when it's near-0 caring or cutting people out and treating them as blank pawns, then THIS IS a human problem FROM those kinds of perspective and faulty as a human result (might make sense as maths or tax but not for people and the right reasons at all).➡️ Often STEM can HIDE people-related problems as a result of cutting it out (Africa's extracted metals, technological targeting etc)
So results can be false without the human voice or for very wrong reasons.
Another way to say it
➡️ without #individualisation, people are counted the same.
The next bean increment is counted are exactly the same as the previous bean / human. 1...12,13...222... treating people as objects.➡️ STEM is more of a #topdown perspective 1) financially and 2) as work practices internally and treats people themselves as objects.
➡️ "1" = same "1"?
To represent 1 person and the next as the same isn't quite right.To represent 1 person in mostly 1 way as object-orientated design is generally not great ...
(Do tell me if a number or tax code represents you well (!) )
➡️ All your attributes and other "values" that you feel can be mostly cut off / skipped / is not important)
➡️ Computers can have correct results or but not at all for humans betterment / consent / consideration
STEM are good or ok-ish...
...for ✔️ computer-computer design and things without a soulbut
...it's a problem for
❌ computer-to-human-to-computer-back-to-human designSTEM is focussed mostly on everything else apart from human beings and their feelings.
and sometimes the whole point is lost as a result (such as social not being generally "social" or leaving it up to people who don't know how to socialise / make a real movement of change)
The effects are mostly done unto others rather than the "how do people feel about it at the time". The human factor and feelings at the time or later is largely missing / not part of the calculation or checking. It's more a material thing...
This makes a perfect tool skipping how people feel - both those calculating and those having the calculation done TO THEM.
STEM doesn't calculate or even deliberately likes to ignore the people doing the work or who it's done on... it's just done or expected or even demanded without more checks with the people. Similar to how aboriginal people and colonial mentality just say "ok now you're doing this" as a command (and conquer).
I think that's why STEM acronym are a group of only THOSE TYPES of tools because everyone wants to cut out how people feel.
If someone doesn't want to do it or has different feelings it's obviously more political (which is why people think Tech is not political but it just skips it a lot of the time).
⚠️ Please boost if I'm wrong or right...
Said because I care a bit more about people I guess... and that is usually not the most popular state given job (to care) or individually chosen way... Hmmm... #FreeSchool
-
The anxiety of individualisation
From On Anxiety by Reneta Salecl, loc 2092:
The Other is for the subject always ‘anxiogen’, since it constantly forces the subject to ask ‘Who am I?’, and especially, ‘Who am I for the Other?’ However, as this book has shown, in post-industrial societies, the subject is also perceived as a self-inventor and as someone who is actually freer from the constraints of other people than our predecessors. So if, on the one hand the subject is still concerned about the question about the desire of the Other (i.e. how others regard them and how they are regarded in society as a whole), on the other hand, the subject is under pressure to make a choice about his or her life independently of social constraints.
#anxiety #detraditionalization #individualisation #Lacan #RenetaSalecl
-
The anxiety of individualisation
From On Anxiety by Reneta Salecl, loc 2092:
The Other is for the subject always ‘anxiogen’, since it constantly forces the subject to ask ‘Who am I?’, and especially, ‘Who am I for the Other?’ However, as this book has shown, in post-industrial societies, the subject is also perceived as a self-inventor and as someone who is actually freer from the constraints of other people than our predecessors. So if, on the one hand the subject is still concerned about the question about the desire of the Other (i.e. how others regard them and how they are regarded in society as a whole), on the other hand, the subject is under pressure to make a choice about his or her life independently of social constraints.
#anxiety #detraditionalization #individualisation #Lacan #RenetaSalecl
-
Die Menschheit tritt in den Höhepunkt der #Individualisation ein, die ihre größtmögliche Fragmentierung bedeutet. #Selbstbestimmung meint hier gegen alle #Vernunft, der Natur und den Intellekt seinen gefühlsbedingten Willen durchzusetzen. Es ist zugleich Höhepunkt der Illusion des Getrenntsein mit allem anderen, denn es gilt den eigenen Lebensplan, die eigene "Bestimmung" durchzusetzen oder zu scheitern, weil die Welt dafür (noch) nicht "stimmig" ist. Deshalb greift auch selbstbestimmte #Einsamkeit um sich.
Die gleichzeitig auftretende Bewegung einer moralisierenden, pluralistischen Gesellschaft ist nur der Reflex, die Sehnsucht nach dem durch Individualisation verlorenen Paradies der körperlichen, seelischen und geistigen Einheit mit der Schöpfung und einem Schöpfer. Denn dieser #Moralismus, die Erzwingung von Vielfalt will nur die Grenzen der eigenen Individualisation vor dem Einfluss allgemeiner Ganzheit in der Verschiedenheit schützen.
Der Fehler hierbei ist, dass nicht das durch Selbsterkenntnis geläuterte Bewusstsein die Einheit anstrebt, sondern nur ein Gefühl der Einheit in einer bestimmten Gruppe, die den eigenen Willen nicht im Wege steht. Diese Einheit des Gefühls, darum sprunghaft, kurzzeitig, intolerant, soll durch Bevormundung, Belehrung, Erziehung und letztlich #Autoritarismus erzwungen werden, was ebenso sinnlos ist, wie erzwungene Liebe.
-
"Avec des moyens, il est parfois possible de réidentifier des personnes à partir de leurs données personnelles, même quand elles ont été anonymisées" : https://theconversation.com/comment-anonymiser-des-donnees-personnelles-199922 par Nesrine #Kaaniche et #MarylineLaurent de Télécom SudParis avec des financements de la Fondation Mines-Télécom.
⸺
#RGPD #dataMining #individualisation #anonymat #donnéesPersonnelles #confidentialité #viePrivée #réidentification #pseudonymat #individualisation #inférence #corrélation -
Here goes my #Introduction:
#Economics and #SocialStats by training, #Quantitative #Criminology by trading.
Interested in all things #SocialScience and #ResearchMethods
Active in:
#Sentencing, where I try to operationalise elusive concepts like #Consistency, #Individualisation, #Proportionality, #Severity or #Discrimination.And #Measurement / #MeasurementError, especially interested in #PoliceData and #CrimeData, their flaws, implications and adjustments, www.recountingcrime.com.
-
Here goes my #Introduction:
#Economics and #SocialStats by training, #Quantitative #Criminology by trading.
Interested in all things #SocialScience and #ResearchMethods
Active in:
#Sentencing, where I try to operationalise elusive concepts like #Consistency, #Individualisation, #Proportionality, #Severity or #Discrimination.And #Measurement / #MeasurementError, especially interested in #PoliceData and #CrimeData, their flaws, implications and adjustments, www.recountingcrime.com.
-
⚕️ "Ces derniers jours ont été rendus les décisions de la CDPI de région PACA concernant des signataires de la tribune contre les pratiques de soins non conventionnelles et non-éprouvées.
Les textes sont sans concession et nous apprécions : la tribune a été lue et comprise." (@fakemedecine, 28 août 2020) ⬇️
https://twitter.com/fakemedecine/status/1299316675678961665#homéopathie #similitude #dilution #dynamisation #individualisation #placebo
#FakeMed
#Boiron #Oscillococcinum #SafeMed #MonHomeoMonChoix -
“#Homéopathie : les Principes - Tronche de Fake #4.1” (La Tronche en Biais)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGDLDljaYxg
“Il faut connaître avant de juger.
D'où vient l'homéopathie, sur quels principes repose-t-elle ? Pour quelle raison ces principes ont-ils été posés ? Que nous disent-ils sur la valeur de la méthode mobilisée par leur inventeur ?
[…]”👨🔬 #TeB #FakeMed #similitude #dilution #dynamisation #individualisation
#Boiron #Oscillococcinum #SafeMed #MonHomeoMonChoix 😛