home.social

#imageforensics — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #imageforensics, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Eighteen panels, each one showing a different sample.
    But - can you spot the overlapping panels? This one is not too hard.
    #ImageForensics

  2. Another nice #ImageForensics for you. Which panels look more similar than expected?

  3. #ImageForensics challenge of the day, and I made it a bit harder. Two panels overlap (tip: they are adjacent panels). Tell or show me which ones, and you might win an Emoji Award!

  4. Oh, come on, @[email protected] Science Translational Medicine, correcting a paper for a photoshopped image? That is absolutely bonkers, and you should do much, much better. #ThisImageIsFine #ImageForensics

  5. *How *not* to handle image manipulation*. Editors, please do not address this level of photoshopping with a correction. In 2020, I flagged Figure 3D of this 2017 BBRC paper. Multiple regions appeared reused within or across panels. pubpeer.com/publications... #ImageForensics /

  6. Wiley's Food Science & Nutrition clearly not checking for image duplication - this should have been caught in 2025. #ImageForensics

  7. Can you spot something unexpected in these four panels? Hint: duplicated groups of fluorescent cells. This is an easy one! Tell or show me at least three sets of problems. The first three correct answers will win an Emoji Award. #ImageForensics

  8. #ImageForensics Kidneys of four differently treated groups of animals. None of these photos should overlap. But is that true???? Tell or show me if you find at least 2 sets of overlaps.

  9. Can you spot the #ImageForensics problem here? (and yes, the taped mice are problematic, too).

  10. An interesting story from the @[email protected] archives. First, I found this super easy #ImageForensics duplication in this 2021 Vaccines paper, doi.org/10.3390/vacc... Shown with blue boxes. I posted it on PubPeer, in August 2022. pubpeer.com/publications... /

  11. A good retraction by @[email protected] of Neurotrope/Synaptogenix / Thomas Jefferson U paper. The $SNPX president/CSO called me a "sir", claimed figures were just 'illustrative examples', the senior author then dropped 200 hard-to-open, un-annotated 'lsm' files - fun times. #ImageForensics

  12. Here is your #ImageForensics challenge of today. Nine panels, different time points and different treatments. None of the panels should overlap or look the same. But.... can you spot the unexpected overlap? This one is easy!

  13. Can you spot the overlapping panels? Tell me which ones! The first three correct answers (either by illustration or a good description) will win that shiny Emoji Award. It will look so good on your resume! #ImageForensics

  14. Fourth retraction for Surgery Professor at @[email protected] : Let's hope he is better at surgery than at electron microscopy. pubpeer.com/publications... #ImageForensics #ScientificPublishing

  15. I know that @[email protected] are trying hard to be taken seriously. But addressing the problems in the original figure (left) by a completely new set of panels (that also have problems; right) puts them straight back into predatory journal range. #ImageForensics #ScientificPublishing /

  16. How many duplicated panels in a scientific paper are still addressable with a correction? How many “oopsies” can a research group make before an Expression of Concern or retraction? This one (anonymized) has 5 duplications in one figure and was corrected. Is that a good outcome? #ImageForensics

  17. Four panels - but two overlap. Can you spot them? #ImageForensics

  18. Of the 19 papers I reported in 2016, 8 have been corrected, 1 was retracted, 1 resolved, and 9 remain unaddressed. This apparently altered photo was corrected by stating that GAPDH was run on separate gels. How is that resolving this issue??? pubpeer.com/publications... #ImageForensics

  19. Reported to @[email protected] in Feb 2016. Asked again in Sept 2017. Journal replied: "The authors have provided a response, and the Editorial Board is deciding how to proceed." They are still deciding, apparently 🦗 pubpeer.com/publications... #ImageForensics

  20. Spot the two overlaps and you might win an Emoji Award! Each panel is from a differently treated rat, so there should not be any overlaps. #ImageForensics #ThisImageIsFine #ScientificPublishing

  21. An Editorial Expression of Concern by @Nature for one of Marc Tessier-Lavigne (former @Stanford president)'s papers. pubpeer.com/publications... www.nature.com/articles/s41... #ImageForensics #ScienceIntegrity

  22. It's a beauty! Can you spot the problems here? Find at least two for your chance of winning one of the three Emoji Awards. #ImageForensics #ThisImageIsFine #ScientificPublishing

  23. An easy one today. Four TEM photos, four different formulations of 'quantum dots'. Can you spot the unexpected overlap? #ImageForensics #ThisImageIsFine #ScientificPublishing