#hijackers — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #hijackers, aggregated by home.social.
-
1. Certainly, I was dismayed when a popular post (100% upvoted) from a highly reputable organisation went 404 (not found) following publication of a Pangram analysis that I explicitly treated as questionable.
I do need to make my own decisions, based partly (not solely) upon non-human analyses, because the radar-like ability that some human analysts bestow upon themselves is a figment of their imagination. Their radar is, quite simply, broken, or wildly prejudiced …
-
1. Certainly, I was dismayed when a popular post (100% upvoted) from a highly reputable organisation went 404 (not found) following publication of a Pangram analysis that I explicitly treated as questionable.
I do need to make my own decisions, based partly (not solely) upon non-human analyses, because the radar-like ability that some human analysts bestow upon themselves is a figment of their imagination. Their radar is, quite simply, broken, or wildly prejudiced …
-
1. Certainly, I was dismayed when a popular post (100% upvoted) from a highly reputable organisation went 404 (not found) following publication of a Pangram analysis that I explicitly treated as questionable.
I do need to make my own decisions, based partly (not solely) upon non-human analyses, because the radar-like ability that some human analysts bestow upon themselves is a figment of their imagination. Their radar is, quite simply, broken, or wildly prejudiced …
-
1. Certainly, I was dismayed when a popular post (100% upvoted) from a highly reputable organisation went 404 (not found) following publication of a Pangram analysis that I explicitly treated as questionable.
I do need to make my own decisions, based partly (not solely) upon non-human analyses, because the radar-like ability that some human analysts bestow upon themselves is a figment of their imagination. Their radar is, quite simply, broken, or wildly prejudiced …
-
1. Certainly, I was dismayed when a popular post (100% upvoted) from a highly reputable organisation went 404 (not found) following publication of a Pangram analysis that I explicitly treated as questionable.
I do need to make my own decisions, based partly (not solely) upon non-human analyses, because the radar-like ability that some human analysts bestow upon themselves is a figment of their imagination. Their radar is, quite simply, broken, or wildly prejudiced …
-
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/116916873674213028
Why did I intentionally mash things up, in my October 2025 post to Reddit?
Because I wanted to ask something about AI.
I knew that what I truly wanted to post would be immediately hijacked by selfish anti-AI protesters who had zero interest in helping me.
So, I intentionally mashed my AI-related question with an unrelated controversial statement by a FreeBSD committer: "There is very little official about the FreeBSD forums. …". I refrained from providing a source for the quote – so readers could not easily identify the name of the committer.
The controversy of the mash-up made my post popular. I paid the expected price – people lying about me in The FreeBSD Forums, ad hominem abuse in Reddit, and so on – but ultimately, the ulterior motive worked:
― I gained an LLM-oriented answer.
cc @gumnos
-
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/116916873674213028
Why did I intentionally mash things up, in my October 2025 post to Reddit?
Because I wanted to ask something about AI.
I knew that what I truly wanted to post would be immediately hijacked by selfish anti-AI protesters who had zero interest in helping me.
So, I intentionally mashed my AI-related question with an unrelated controversial statement by a FreeBSD committer: "There is very little official about the FreeBSD forums. …". I refrained from providing a source for the quote – so readers could not easily identify the name of the committer.
The controversy of the mash-up made my post popular. I paid the expected price – people lying about me in The FreeBSD Forums, ad hominem abuse in Reddit, and so on – but ultimately, the ulterior motive worked:
― I gained an LLM-oriented answer.
cc @gumnos
-
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/116916873674213028
Why did I intentionally mash things up, in my October 2025 post to Reddit?
Because I wanted to ask something about AI.
I knew that what I truly wanted to post would be immediately hijacked by selfish anti-AI protesters who had zero interest in helping me.
So, I intentionally mashed my AI-related question with an unrelated controversial statement by a FreeBSD committer: "There is very little official about the FreeBSD forums. …". I refrained from providing a source for the quote – so readers could not easily identify the name of the committer.
The controversy of the mash-up made my post popular. I paid the expected price – people lying about me in The FreeBSD Forums, ad hominem abuse in Reddit, and so on – but ultimately, the ulterior motive worked:
― I gained an LLM-oriented answer.
cc @gumnos
-
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/116916873674213028
Why did I intentionally mash things up, in my October 2025 post to Reddit?
Because I wanted to ask something about AI.
I knew that what I truly wanted to post would be immediately hijacked by selfish anti-AI protesters who had zero interest in helping me.
So, I intentionally mashed my AI-related question with an unrelated controversial statement by a FreeBSD committer: "There is very little official about the FreeBSD forums. …". I refrained from providing a source for the quote – so readers could not easily identify the name of the committer.
The controversy of the mash-up made my post popular. I paid the expected price – people lying about me in The FreeBSD Forums, ad hominem abuse in Reddit, and so on – but ultimately, the ulterior motive worked:
― I gained an LLM-oriented answer.
cc @gumnos
-
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/116916873674213028
Why did I intentionally mash things up, in my October 2025 post to Reddit?
Because I wanted to ask something about AI.
I knew that what I truly wanted to post would be immediately hijacked by selfish anti-AI protesters who had zero interest in helping me.
So, I intentionally mashed my AI-related question with an unrelated controversial statement by a FreeBSD committer: "There is very little official about the FreeBSD forums. …". I refrained from providing a source for the quote – so readers could not easily identify the name of the committer.
The controversy of the mash-up made my post popular. I paid the expected price – people lying about me in The FreeBSD Forums, ad hominem abuse in Reddit, and so on – but ultimately, the ulterior motive worked:
― I gained an LLM-oriented answer.
cc @gumnos
-
https://www.europesays.com/africa/247370/ Hijackers drive away with five-year-old girl! #CapeTown #drive #girl #hijackers #hijacking #SouthAfrica
-
In major victory for 9/11 families federal judge refused to dismiss lawsuit accusing #SaudiArabia of employing 2 men to assist hijackers in attacks on World Trade Center & #Pentagon. In 45-page order, US District Judge George Daniels found recently surfaced evidence about roles played by 2 men linked to Saudi govt Omar al-Bayoumi, Fahad al-Thumairy persuasive enough to let 9/11 families press claims that Saudi Arabia employed the men to help at least 2 of the #hijackers https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26078539-ksa-ruling-82825-ocr/
-
In major victory for 9/11 families federal judge refused to dismiss lawsuit accusing #SaudiArabia of employing 2 men to assist hijackers in attacks on World Trade Center & #Pentagon. In 45-page order, US District Judge George Daniels found recently surfaced evidence about roles played by 2 men linked to Saudi govt Omar al-Bayoumi, Fahad al-Thumairy persuasive enough to let 9/11 families press claims that Saudi Arabia employed the men to help at least 2 of the #hijackers https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26078539-ksa-ruling-82825-ocr/
-
In major victory for 9/11 families federal judge refused to dismiss lawsuit accusing #SaudiArabia of employing 2 men to assist hijackers in attacks on World Trade Center & #Pentagon. In 45-page order, US District Judge George Daniels found recently surfaced evidence about roles played by 2 men linked to Saudi govt Omar al-Bayoumi, Fahad al-Thumairy persuasive enough to let 9/11 families press claims that Saudi Arabia employed the men to help at least 2 of the #hijackers https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26078539-ksa-ruling-82825-ocr/
-
In major victory for 9/11 families federal judge refused to dismiss lawsuit accusing #SaudiArabia of employing 2 men to assist hijackers in attacks on World Trade Center & #Pentagon. In 45-page order, US District Judge George Daniels found recently surfaced evidence about roles played by 2 men linked to Saudi govt Omar al-Bayoumi, Fahad al-Thumairy persuasive enough to let 9/11 families press claims that Saudi Arabia employed the men to help at least 2 of the #hijackers https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26078539-ksa-ruling-82825-ocr/
-
In major victory for 9/11 families federal judge refused to dismiss lawsuit accusing #SaudiArabia of employing 2 men to assist hijackers in attacks on World Trade Center & #Pentagon. In 45-page order, US District Judge George Daniels found recently surfaced evidence about roles played by 2 men linked to Saudi govt Omar al-Bayoumi, Fahad al-Thumairy persuasive enough to let 9/11 families press claims that Saudi Arabia employed the men to help at least 2 of the #hijackers https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26078539-ksa-ruling-82825-ocr/
-
Whatsapp hijackers take over your account while you sleep 👇 :2001:
(always use an app lock, a MFA layer.. or better yet opt for another messaging app )
-
Whatsapp hijackers take over your account while you sleep 👇 :2001:
(always use an app lock, a MFA layer.. or better yet opt for another messaging app )
-
Whatsapp hijackers take over your account while you sleep 👇 :2001:
(always use an app lock, a MFA layer.. or better yet opt for another messaging app )
