home.social

#genderincongruence — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #genderincongruence, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. UK Puberty Blocker Trial Paused Amid Regulator's Safety Concerns

    UK's Pathways trial for puberty blockers paused by MHRA due to safety concerns. Discusses age limits and future of the trial for young people.

    #PubertyBlockers, #UKTrial, #MHRA, #YouthHealth, #GenderIncongruence

    newsletter.tf/uk-puberty-block

  2. The UK's Pathways trial for puberty blockers has been paused. The regulator, MHRA, has safety concerns, especially about the age limit for participants.

    #PubertyBlockers, #UKTrial, #MHRA, #YouthHealth, #GenderIncongruence

    newsletter.tf/uk-puberty-block

  3. Clinical Trial for Puberty Blockers Paused Amid Regulatory Concerns

    A UK clinical trial for puberty blockers for gender incongruence is paused. The MHRA has safety concerns about young participants, especially the minimum age.

    #PubertyBlockers, #ClinicalTrial, #MHRA, #ChildSafety, #GenderIncongruence

    newsletter.tf/uk-puberty-block

  4. CW: Several Problems Press: Several problems — The Courier-Mail, 27 November 2022; CW: transphobia

    4. "There are lists of 'gender affirming' doctors, who all approach patient care differently, being shared on government platforms."

    The use of the word "platforms" here is slightly confusing, because it feels like it's suggesting Australian governments are running public #Mastodon instances or something (are they? I hadn't heard). Actually, though, I think this is referring to, at least, the "#GenderIncongruence" page [1] on the #AustralianGovernment's HEALTHDIRECT service, which is mentioned by Cross shortly afterwards.

    The page says this: "You can find a list of gender-affirming clinicians at TransHub [2] and AusPATH [3]."

    This part of the article seems like another version of the narrative also favoured by the ABC's #MediaWatch [4], to the effect that "it's wrong for government to cite or consult external experts in any way". I personally have only ever seen journalists try that one when attacking trans people — and, I expect, other marginalised groups — because in any context other than discrediting authorities who defend marginalised people, it would be correctly recognised as blatantly absurd.

    SECTION NOTES

    [1] healthdirect.gov.au/gender-inc

    [2] transhub.org.au/doctors

    [3] auspath.org.au/providers/

    [4] severalproblems.press/2022/10/ (self cite lmao, cringe)

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.