#frank-herbert — Public Fediverse posts

Movie TV Tech Geeks #BooksandComics #SciFi #Books #FrankHerbert 8 Sci-Fi Books That Can Be Called Masterpieces http://dlvr.it/TTppHk

Movie TV Tech Geeks #BooksandComics #SciFi #Books #FrankHerbert 8 Sci-Fi Books That Can Be Called Masterpieces http://dlvr.it/TTppHk

📸 Dune Windtrap cross-section | par Squid Empire
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/mOZJX8
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

“There are no shortcuts to any place worth going”*…

As Anne Lawrence-Mathers explains, centuries before Neo instantly mastered Kung Fu in The Matrix, and AI emerged promising quick command of any subject to any of us, medieval scholars found a shortcut to years of difficult study: a magical manuscript that promised to fast-track advanced learning. Anne Lawrence-Mathers investigates the Ars notoria, its supposed powers, and the demonic influence it had upon some users…

Mastering the full range of subjects taught in medieval universities normally required many years of hard and expensive study. From the thirteenth century on, however, an anonymous work known as the Ars notoria promised, through diagrams, incantations, and arcane rituals, to rapidly transmit to scholars the total knowledge of anything they might need. Condemned by church authorities, the fifty-six extant manuscripts nevertheless testify to the seductiveness of that offer.

Its complex diagrams were at the center of its appeal. Unlike diagrams in other magical texts, those in Ars notoria do not illustrate what the text is seeking to communicate. Nor do they act as models to be replicated in three-dimensional form as pieces of magical equipment. Instead, they supposedly work almost in the same way as religious icons. That is, faithful possession and use of them can offer direct contact with powerful and benign supernatural forces — and ultimately even with God. The diagrams themselves are the route to magic and consist of arrangements of symbolic and geometric forms, patterns, and symbols, interspersed with “words”, which are frequently unintelligible combinations of letters.3 Practitioners who opened their minds to receive and imprint these labyrinthine images, while reciting complex verbal formulae and strings of mysterious, almost unpronounceable words and names, are engaging in a significant act of trust.

Several factors made the Ars notoria fundamentally different from other magical texts. First, this is not a text in conflict with the church. In fact, the rituals framing and shaping usage of the images are presented as extremely pious, and the texts to be recited are identified as prayers. The alien words, names, and characters are explained as coming from ancient languages such as Greek, Hebrew, and “Chaldean”, and are claimed to preserve both the names of angels and words used to communicate with them. Second, the advantages offered are relatively virtuous: contact with spiritual beings and full knowledge of the subjects taught in medieval universities. Such claims cut little ice with thirteenth-century theologians, however, who saw clear links to things condemned as superstitious and demonic by St Augustine, despite the text’s assertion that it contains wisdom revealed to King Solomon.

St Thomas Aquinas was worried enough by the Ars notoria to name and condemn it specifically in his Summa theologiae — one of the most authoritative summaries of Christian teaching. He dealt with the very serious issue of superstition in Book Two, Part 2 — Question 96 is effectively devoted to the Ars notoria. Aquinas’ conclusion is wholly negative: the “art” is both “unlawful and futile”. It is futile because it cannot deliver what it promises. Still more seriously, its “signs” are neither understood by humans (like ordinary words and letters) nor sent by God (as sacraments are), and thus are precisely the type of thing that lures humans into contact and compact with demons.

That may seem a conclusive case for the rejection of the Ars notoria, especially as Aquinas’ objections were echoed by other major theologians. However, the number of surviving medieval copies of the work, and the fact that it was copied and owned in religious institutions until the end of the medieval period, show that the church ultimately had neither the interest nor ability to stamp it out. Moreover, it was translated in the early modern period and also went into print, demonstrating an ongoing — and more widespread — interest…

[Professor Lawrence-Mathers explains how the Ars notoria was used…]

… For some users, the rituals were so powerful that they seemed demonic. One of these was Brother John, an early fourteenth-century monk of the abbey of Morigny, near Étampes. John’s account of his introduction to the text, his powerful attraction to it, and the terrifying experiences he underwent while using it, was given in several chapters of John’s own, visionary work, the early fourteenth century Liber florum celestis doctrine.6

The great attraction of the Ars notoria for John was its promise of quick access to advanced scholarly knowledge. He recounts his continuing wish to study, and how he was lent a copy of a book of necromancy by “a certain cleric”. He copied much of it and wanted more. This led to an encounter with a “medical expert” from Lombardy, who informed John that what he needed was the Ars notoria, and that a copy of it was to be found within the walls of the school (at Orléans) where John had been sent. These details provide important evidence of the liminal status of works of ritual magic. They were recognised as dangerous, and were far from being officially approved, and yet were well known, owned and recommended by educated individuals, including monks and clerics.

For John, the Ars notoria was dangerous not in some abstract way, but very directly. He confesses that it struck him at first as beautiful and holy, and seemed to offer miraculous gifts rather than demonic temptations. It became apparent, however, that the book was utterly deceptive, a work of the Devil, a “sick pleasure” that was actually fatally poisonous to the soul, not only to the body…

Medieval “technology”: “Artificial Intelligence– Ars Notoria and the Promise of Instant Knowledge,” from @publicdomainrev.bsky.social.

Pair with: “The Cost of Seamlessness” from @taotuner.bsky.social, and “Experience vs. Efficiency: Why the Human Still Matters in Learning,” from @lnddave.bsky.social.

Also a (vaguely) apposite, but (very) amusing (in a macabre kind of way) report on a piece of OpenAI’s handiwork: “US government map of Africa mislabels every country at global conference.”

* Beverly Sills

###

As we do the work, we might recall that it was on this date in 1965 that Frank Herbert’s Dune was published.

Herbert published a three-part serial Dune World in the monthly Analog, from December 1963 to February 1964. The serial was accompanied by several illustrations that were not published again. After an interval of a year, he published the much slower-paced five-part The Prophet of Dune in the January–May 1965 issues. The first serial became “Book One: Dune” in the final published Dune novel, and the second serial was divided into “Book Two: Muad’dib” and “Book Three: The Prophet”. The serialized version was expanded, reworked, and submitted to more than twenty publishers, each of whom rejected it. The novel, Dune, was finally accepted and published in August 1965 by Chilton Books, a printing house better known for publishing auto repair manuals. Sterling Lanier, an editor at Chilton, had seen Herbert’s manuscript and had urged his company to take a risk in publishing the book. However, the first printing, priced at $5.95 (equivalent to $60.79 in 2025), did not sell well and was poorly received by critics as being atypical of science fiction at the time. Chilton considered the publication of Dune a write-off and Lanier was fired. Over the course of time, the book gained critical acclaim, and its popularity spread by word-of-mouth to allow Herbert to start working full time on developing the sequels to Dune, elements of which were already written alongside Dune.

– source

Herbert died in 1986; his son Brian Herbert and author Kevin J. Anderson continued the series in over a dozen additional novels since 1999. Among them was Dune: The Butlerian Jihad, a prequel which chronicles the fictional Butlerian Jihad, a crusade by the last free humans in the universe against the thinking machines, a violent and dominating force led by the sentient computer Omnius.

“There are no shortcuts to any place worth going”*…

As Anne Lawrence-Mathers explains, centuries before Neo instantly mastered Kung Fu in The Matrix, and AI emerged promising quick command of any subject to any of us, medieval scholars found a shortcut to years of difficult study: a magical manuscript that promised to fast-track advanced learning. Anne Lawrence-Mathers investigates the Ars notoria, its supposed powers, and the demonic influence it had upon some users…

Mastering the full range of subjects taught in medieval universities normally required many years of hard and expensive study. From the thirteenth century on, however, an anonymous work known as the Ars notoria promised, through diagrams, incantations, and arcane rituals, to rapidly transmit to scholars the total knowledge of anything they might need. Condemned by church authorities, the fifty-six extant manuscripts nevertheless testify to the seductiveness of that offer.

Its complex diagrams were at the center of its appeal. Unlike diagrams in other magical texts, those in Ars notoria do not illustrate what the text is seeking to communicate. Nor do they act as models to be replicated in three-dimensional form as pieces of magical equipment. Instead, they supposedly work almost in the same way as religious icons. That is, faithful possession and use of them can offer direct contact with powerful and benign supernatural forces — and ultimately even with God. The diagrams themselves are the route to magic and consist of arrangements of symbolic and geometric forms, patterns, and symbols, interspersed with “words”, which are frequently unintelligible combinations of letters.3 Practitioners who opened their minds to receive and imprint these labyrinthine images, while reciting complex verbal formulae and strings of mysterious, almost unpronounceable words and names, are engaging in a significant act of trust.

Several factors made the Ars notoria fundamentally different from other magical texts. First, this is not a text in conflict with the church. In fact, the rituals framing and shaping usage of the images are presented as extremely pious, and the texts to be recited are identified as prayers. The alien words, names, and characters are explained as coming from ancient languages such as Greek, Hebrew, and “Chaldean”, and are claimed to preserve both the names of angels and words used to communicate with them. Second, the advantages offered are relatively virtuous: contact with spiritual beings and full knowledge of the subjects taught in medieval universities. Such claims cut little ice with thirteenth-century theologians, however, who saw clear links to things condemned as superstitious and demonic by St Augustine, despite the text’s assertion that it contains wisdom revealed to King Solomon.

St Thomas Aquinas was worried enough by the Ars notoria to name and condemn it specifically in his Summa theologiae — one of the most authoritative summaries of Christian teaching. He dealt with the very serious issue of superstition in Book Two, Part 2 — Question 96 is effectively devoted to the Ars notoria. Aquinas’ conclusion is wholly negative: the “art” is both “unlawful and futile”. It is futile because it cannot deliver what it promises. Still more seriously, its “signs” are neither understood by humans (like ordinary words and letters) nor sent by God (as sacraments are), and thus are precisely the type of thing that lures humans into contact and compact with demons.

That may seem a conclusive case for the rejection of the Ars notoria, especially as Aquinas’ objections were echoed by other major theologians. However, the number of surviving medieval copies of the work, and the fact that it was copied and owned in religious institutions until the end of the medieval period, show that the church ultimately had neither the interest nor ability to stamp it out. Moreover, it was translated in the early modern period and also went into print, demonstrating an ongoing — and more widespread — interest…

[Professor Lawrence-Mathers explains how the Ars notoria was used…]

… For some users, the rituals were so powerful that they seemed demonic. One of these was Brother John, an early fourteenth-century monk of the abbey of Morigny, near Étampes. John’s account of his introduction to the text, his powerful attraction to it, and the terrifying experiences he underwent while using it, was given in several chapters of John’s own, visionary work, the early fourteenth century Liber florum celestis doctrine.6

The great attraction of the Ars notoria for John was its promise of quick access to advanced scholarly knowledge. He recounts his continuing wish to study, and how he was lent a copy of a book of necromancy by “a certain cleric”. He copied much of it and wanted more. This led to an encounter with a “medical expert” from Lombardy, who informed John that what he needed was the Ars notoria, and that a copy of it was to be found within the walls of the school (at Orléans) where John had been sent. These details provide important evidence of the liminal status of works of ritual magic. They were recognised as dangerous, and were far from being officially approved, and yet were well known, owned and recommended by educated individuals, including monks and clerics.

For John, the Ars notoria was dangerous not in some abstract way, but very directly. He confesses that it struck him at first as beautiful and holy, and seemed to offer miraculous gifts rather than demonic temptations. It became apparent, however, that the book was utterly deceptive, a work of the Devil, a “sick pleasure” that was actually fatally poisonous to the soul, not only to the body…

Medieval “technology”: “Artificial Intelligence– Ars Notoria and the Promise of Instant Knowledge,” from @publicdomainrev.bsky.social.

Pair with: “The Cost of Seamlessness” from @taotuner.bsky.social, and “Experience vs. Efficiency: Why the Human Still Matters in Learning,” from @lnddave.bsky.social.

Also a (vaguely) apposite, but (very) amusing (in a macabre kind of way) report on a piece of OpenAI’s handiwork: “US government map of Africa mislabels every country at global conference.”

* Beverly Sills

###

As we do the work, we might recall that it was on this date in 1965 that Frank Herbert’s Dune was published.

Herbert published a three-part serial Dune World in the monthly Analog, from December 1963 to February 1964. The serial was accompanied by several illustrations that were not published again. After an interval of a year, he published the much slower-paced five-part The Prophet of Dune in the January–May 1965 issues. The first serial became “Book One: Dune” in the final published Dune novel, and the second serial was divided into “Book Two: Muad’dib” and “Book Three: The Prophet”. The serialized version was expanded, reworked, and submitted to more than twenty publishers, each of whom rejected it. The novel, Dune, was finally accepted and published in August 1965 by Chilton Books, a printing house better known for publishing auto repair manuals. Sterling Lanier, an editor at Chilton, had seen Herbert’s manuscript and had urged his company to take a risk in publishing the book. However, the first printing, priced at $5.95 (equivalent to $60.79 in 2025), did not sell well and was poorly received by critics as being atypical of science fiction at the time. Chilton considered the publication of Dune a write-off and Lanier was fired. Over the course of time, the book gained critical acclaim, and its popularity spread by word-of-mouth to allow Herbert to start working full time on developing the sequels to Dune, elements of which were already written alongside Dune.

– source

Herbert died in 1986; his son Brian Herbert and author Kevin J. Anderson continued the series in over a dozen additional novels since 1999. Among them was Dune: The Butlerian Jihad, a prequel which chronicles the fictional Butlerian Jihad, a crusade by the last free humans in the universe against the thinking machines, a violent and dominating force led by the sentient computer Omnius.

📸 Atreides | par Totalrandom454
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/41oZNl
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

@si_irini

#Psychologie #Scifi #FrankHerbert #Dune

...I will permit it to pass over me and through me.'

Few themes in modern #psychology and #neuroscience over the last decade have been more prominent than this:
👉that avoiding negative emotions tends to make them stronger. This is particularly true with anxiety and fear, where several important therapies are based around helping people tolerate exposure to their fear in order to gradually lessen it. 👈

//

@si_irini

#Psychologie #Scifi #FrankHerbert #Dune

...I will permit it to pass over me and through me.'

Few themes in modern #psychology and #neuroscience over the last decade have been more prominent than this:
👉that avoiding negative emotions tends to make them stronger. This is particularly true with anxiety and fear, where several important therapies are based around helping people tolerate exposure to their fear in order to gradually lessen it. 👈

//

@si_irini

#Psychologie #Scifi

Dein Gedicht ruft bei mir sofort Erinnerungen an #FrankHerbert|s #Dune--#DerWüstenplanet-Saga 🤗 und die #LitaneiDerFurcht hervor:

https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol/112917102293610287

Spätere Forschungen von Psychologen1) zeigten übrigens, dass derartige #Mantren funktionieren können. 💡

@si_irini

#Psychologie #Scifi

Dein Gedicht ruft bei mir sofort Erinnerungen an #FrankHerbert|s #Dune--#DerWüstenplanet-Saga 🤗 und die #LitaneiDerFurcht hervor:

https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol/112917102293610287

Spätere Forschungen von Psychologen1) zeigten übrigens, dass derartige #Mantren funktionieren können. 💡

📸 Czech book edition of Dune | par Emil Křižka
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/2BmxmK
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

Human Legacy And The Preservation Of Knowledge

https://johnbronze.wordpress.com/2026/07/13/human-legacy-and-the-preservation-of-knowledge/

Human Legacy And The Preservation Of Knowledge

https://johnbronze.wordpress.com/2026/07/13/human-legacy-and-the-preservation-of-knowledge/

Dune: Part 3 gets a trailer. Watch it here https://bit.ly/4pcnthK

#Dune #DunePart3 #Dune3 #Zendaya #TimotheeChalamet #RobertPattinson #FlorencePugh #JasonMomoa #film #FrankHerbert #book #scifi

Dune: Part 3 gets a trailer. Watch it here https://bit.ly/4pcnthK

#Dune #DunePart3 #Dune3 #Zendaya #TimotheeChalamet #RobertPattinson #FlorencePugh #JasonMomoa #film #FrankHerbert #book #scifi

@lauren The Butlerian Jihad is well underway, then. Good.

#Dune #FrankHerbert

@lauren The Butlerian Jihad is well underway, then. Good.

#Dune #FrankHerbert

📸 Paul the Prophet | par Mikhail Vergizov
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/mAV2We
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

"Pourquoi J. R. R. Tolkien détestait Dune de Frank Herbert"

#Litérature #Culture #Tolkien #FrankHerbert #Dune ... Excellente réflexion sur les approches et messages sur le pouvoir et ses usages.

https://actualitte.com/article/128434/insolite/pourquoi-j-r-r-tolkien-detestait-dune-de-frank-herbert

"Pourquoi J. R. R. Tolkien détestait Dune de Frank Herbert"

#Litérature #Culture #Tolkien #FrankHerbert #Dune ... Excellente réflexion sur les approches et messages sur le pouvoir et ses usages.

https://actualitte.com/article/128434/insolite/pourquoi-j-r-r-tolkien-detestait-dune-de-frank-herbert

📸 Muad'Dib| par Anastasiia Vlasko
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/2BPQxy
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

Just Because We Can, Doesn’t Mean We Should

https://hyperionarchive.wordpress.com/2026/06/28/just-because-we-can-doesnt-mean-we-should/

Just Because We Can, Doesn’t Mean We Should

https://hyperionarchive.wordpress.com/2026/06/28/just-because-we-can-doesnt-mean-we-should/

Wake me up when the Butlerian Jihad is over.

#Dune #FrankHerbert #NoAI

📸 Sandworm Dagger (Atreides Style) | par Marshang
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/a0Kr5L
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

Current read

Dune, Exploration Scientifique et Culturelle d'une Planète-Univers

Directed by Roland Lehoucq

#Dune #science #sciencefiction #scifi #astronomy #ShaiHulud #FrankHerbert #RolandLehoucq #book

Current read

Dune, Exploration Scientifique et Culturelle d'une Planète-Univers

Directed by Roland Lehoucq

#Dune #science #sciencefiction #scifi #astronomy #ShaiHulud #FrankHerbert #RolandLehoucq #book

me reading the opening pages of Dune, by Frank Herbert:

https://youtu.be/M4VvshnYrzA?is=wws1LJgb5ibKPMkh

#Dune
#FrankHerbert
#ebooknarration

📸 Sardaukar | par Kateryna Zanevych-Keyvan
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/nJok6o
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

📸 Dune — Vellum Cloth Simulation | par Max Chernov
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/6L9aW5
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

📸 Dune — Thumper · MPM Sand Simulation | par Max Chernov
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/L4n2nl
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

My latest article for Inquirer.net, the digital arm of the Philippine Daily Inquirer, is now up! 🎉

https://technology.inquirer.net/147084/dunes-butlerian-jihad-and-the-future-of-ai

Here I introduce Dune’s Butlerian Jihad for those who haven’t read Frank Herbert’s novels and how it relates to the current AI age.

#Dune #TechINQ #FrankHerbert #ButlerianJihad #AI #AIBubble

My latest article for Inquirer.net, the digital arm of the Philippine Daily Inquirer, is now up! 🎉

https://technology.inquirer.net/147084/dunes-butlerian-jihad-and-the-future-of-ai

Here I introduce Dune’s Butlerian Jihad for those who haven’t read Frank Herbert’s novels and how it relates to the current AI age.

#Dune #TechINQ #FrankHerbert #ButlerianJihad #AI #AIBubble

📸 God Emperor of Dune | par Lidi Goldbrunner
➡️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/BkB5vz
#FrankHerbert #Novel #SciFiBook #DuneArt #FanArt #SciFiArt #Dune

People and books that helped form who I am today:

#GrahamGreene
#JohnUpdike
#WalkerPercy
#kurtvonnegutjr
#JohnIrving
#RalphEllison
#HermannHesse
#LorenEiseley
#JamesBaldwin
#JohnSteinbeck
#RayBradbury
#FrankHerbert
#StrangerInAStrangeLand
#MalcomX
#KimStanleyRobinson
#JulianJaynes
#SomeTimesAGreatNotion
#WendellBerry
#WhatArePeopleFor
#EdwardAbbey
#DesertSolitaire
#TomRussell
#CarlHiaasen
#MichaelPollan
#BotanyOfDesire
#PattiSmith
#MichaelStipe
#DavidSedaris
#CormacMcCarthy

People and books that helped form who I am today:

#GrahamGreene
#JohnUpdike
#WalkerPercy
#kurtvonnegutjr
#JohnIrving
#RalphEllison
#HermannHesse
#LorenEiseley
#JamesBaldwin
#JohnSteinbeck
#RayBradbury
#FrankHerbert
#StrangerInAStrangeLand
#MalcomX
#KimStanleyRobinson
#JulianJaynes
#SomeTimesAGreatNotion
#WendellBerry
#WhatArePeopleFor
#EdwardAbbey
#DesertSolitaire
#TomRussell
#CarlHiaasen
#MichaelPollan
#BotanyOfDesire
#PattiSmith
#MichaelStipe
#DavidSedaris
#CormacMcCarthy

Overrated

You know what it is about this question that I don’t like? Obviously you don’t because why would you? Unless you’re a telepath or something which would make sense. And would be kind of cool. Are you? What I don’t like about this question is that it assumes the person answering it is not only a literary scholar or expert, but has the authority to decide and determine what we should and shouldn’t read, and why. I don’t care if it’s Janet Maslin or Roger Ebert, everything boils down to taste and personal preference (which might be the same things, I don’t know), and not to sound self-important, but I want to make those decisions myself.

So what does this all mean? It means that while I like reading a synopsis of a book or a movie, I don’t want to read reviews or look at ratings of a book or a movie.

Having said all that I’ll answer the question because a book just popped into my mind. I’m guessing someone out there is a telepath and put the thought there although I’m not sure how that would work because I haven’t published this blog yet. But then would that matter because the telepath would know what I’m typing here before I publish it, right?

The book: Dune by Frank Herbert
Why: I thought it was boring and I didn’t like Paul

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYvkICbTZIQ&list=RDyYvkICbTZIQ&start_radio=1

I’m late to the Sabres of Paradise — Dune comparison and curious if anyone has read Sabres and know if it’s a compelling story, I mean apart from historical importance of the events.

#SabresOfParadise #Dune #History #LesleyBlanch #FrankHerbert

@zarkanian #AI #FrankHerbert #Dune

#Dune #DunePartTwo #FrankHerbert #ScienceFiction #Film #Movies

@orionkidder

Thank you.

#Dune and the other original sequels are one of the limited number of books 📚 I have been coming across time and again.

The story is just so way above anything #StarWars (which I also like, but rather for entertainment reasons only has to offer with regard to outer and inner insights, it is really a pitty #FrankHerbert is no longer among us.

But maybe for the better? --Humanity is really--knowingly--pushing Earth 🌍 's climate towards Dune's.

@orionkidder

#HPsCommentary #SciFI

*A Critique of #FrankHerbert's #Dune Saga*

You've raised important points about context, and you're right that the #BeneGesserit are morally compromised manipulators whose #Eugenic project deserves scrutiny. Your reminder that #Paul and the Bene Gesserit aren't simple heroes is genuinely valuable— #Herbert absolutely subverts the "chosen one" trope.

However, I'd gently push back on a few specifics. Paul isn't presented as a #Hitler admirer; rather, 👉his...

@Wolf yes I read that book a few times back then, and agreed it is very #apropos and #notsureyouknew 😬 #Dune #FrankHerbert

Dune by Frank Herbert (unabridged; read by George Guidall)
https://m.soundcloud.com/anthony-75348590/dune-by-frank-herbert-unabridged-read-by-george-guidall

#Dune #FrankHerbert #Audiobook

YouTube Tipp ▶️
#DUNEPart3 sieht komplett anders aus als die beiden Vorgänger! #Dune #DunePartThree #FrankHerbert
https://youtu.be/kgbND5gAib0?is=cO__2m40Gou1XQhq

How should I read the #Dune series?

#books #scifi #FrankHerbert