home.social

#foodlabeling — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #foodlabeling, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. ICYMI: Mars faces class action over quinoa listed under 2% on Seeds of Change pack: Complaint puts damages above $5m and covers a nationwide class of buyers, filed August 12 in San Diego. Front-of-pack ingredient order now faces a jury test. ppc.land/mars-faces-class-acti #Mars #ClassAction #Quinoa #SeedsOfChange #FoodLabeling

  2. ICYMI: Mars faces class action over quinoa listed under 2% on Seeds of Change pack: Complaint puts damages above $5m and covers a nationwide class of buyers, filed August 12 in San Diego. Front-of-pack ingredient order now faces a jury test. ppc.land/mars-faces-class-acti #Mars #ClassAction #Quinoa #SeedsOfChange #FoodLabeling

  3. Mars faces class action over quinoa listed under 2% on Seeds of Change pack: Complaint puts damages above $5m and covers a nationwide class of buyers, filed August 12 in San Diego. Front-of-pack ingredient order now faces a jury test. ppc.land/mars-faces-class-acti #MarsClassAction #Quinoa #SeedsOfChange #FoodLabeling #ConsumerRights

  4. Mars faces class action over quinoa listed under 2% on Seeds of Change pack: Complaint puts damages above $5m and covers a nationwide class of buyers, filed August 12 in San Diego. Front-of-pack ingredient order now faces a jury test. ppc.land/mars-faces-class-acti #MarsClassAction #Quinoa #SeedsOfChange #FoodLabeling #ConsumerRights

  5. You had exactly one job here: let customers tell vegetarian and vegan products apart, quickly and without a magnifying glass. Instead of fixing the existing accessibility gap, you doubled down and made it worse.

    Do better.

    #vlabel #accessibility #a11y #inclusivedesign #veganlabel #vegetarianlabel #colorblindaccessibility #foodlabeling #designfail #uxfail #accessibilitymatters #inclusivedesignmatters #vegan #veganfood

  6. You had exactly one job here: let customers tell vegetarian and vegan products apart, quickly and without a magnifying glass. Instead of fixing the existing accessibility gap, you doubled down and made it worse.

    Do better.

    #vlabel #accessibility #a11y #inclusivedesign #veganlabel #vegetarianlabel #colorblindaccessibility #foodlabeling #designfail #uxfail #accessibilitymatters #inclusivedesignmatters #vegan #veganfood

  7. You had exactly one job here: let customers tell vegetarian and vegan products apart, quickly and without a magnifying glass. Instead of fixing the existing accessibility gap, you doubled down and made it worse.

    Do better.

    #vlabel #accessibility #a11y #inclusivedesign #veganlabel #vegetarianlabel #colorblindaccessibility #foodlabeling #designfail #uxfail #accessibilitymatters #inclusivedesignmatters #vegan #veganfood

  8. You had exactly one job here: let customers tell vegetarian and vegan products apart, quickly and without a magnifying glass. Instead of fixing the existing accessibility gap, you doubled down and made it worse.

    Do better.

    #vlabel #accessibility #a11y #inclusivedesign #veganlabel #vegetarianlabel #colorblindaccessibility #foodlabeling #designfail #uxfail #accessibilitymatters #inclusivedesignmatters #vegan #veganfood

  9. Canada’s cloned-food pause is not the same as a green light

    A Canadian food policy debate is raising one blunt question: should shoppers be told when cloning is part of the supply chain?

    Dear Cherubs, the viral version of this story is neat, dramatic, and a little too eager to jump the queue. Health Canada did propose changing how foods from cloned cattle and swine are regulated, but the department later said it had indefinitely paused the update after receiving significant feedback from consumers and industry. As of that Nov. 19 update, cloned-cattle and cloned-swine foods still remain subject to the novel-food assessment, and Health Canada says there are currently no approved cloned products on the Canadian market.

    WHAT ACTUALLY CHANGED

    The proposal came out of a 2023 scientific opinion that concluded foods derived from healthy cloned cattle and swine, and their offspring, are as safe and nutritious as foods from traditionally bred animals. On that basis, Health Canada proposed removing those foods from the “novel food” category, which would have ended the pre-market notification route for those products under the Food and Drug Regulations. In bureaucratic English, that is less “new food on the shelf tomorrow” and more “we may stop treating these items like regulatory special guests.”

    The proposal was also described by Health Canada as consistent with the interpretation of other trusted jurisdictions, including the United States, Europe, Japan, and New Zealand. That matters because food regulators love a good international confidence boost almost as much as they love a consultation document. Still, Health Canada’s current position is the pause button, not the checkout button.

    WHY PEOPLE ARE SIDE-EYEING IT

    The backlash makes sense. Global News reported that critics worried consumers could end up buying cloned-animal products without labels, while duBreton, a Quebec pork producer, publicly pushed for mandatory labeling and transparency. This is not really a food-poisoning panic; it is a trust-and-choice argument, which is arguably even more awkward for regulators because it cannot be solved with a lab coat and a press release.

    Supporters of the proposal have a different line: if the science says the food is as safe and nutritious as conventional meat, then cloned-origin products should not need a separate treatment forever. That position is reflected in Health Canada’s own consultation materials, which say the policy update was being considered because the science underpinned a conclusion of safety.

    The real headache is that food regulation is never just about chemistry. It is about whether shoppers feel informed, whether brands can protect their reputation, and whether “same as conventional” still sounds reassuring when the origin story is doing cartwheels in the background. As noted by thisclaimer.com, the bigger issue is not simply what is in the package, but whether people believe they are being told the full story.

    So the honest read is this: Canada did not quietly unleash cloned meat and dairy on an unsuspecting public. It proposed a policy change, the public noticed, and Health Canada hit pause. That is a very different story from “it is already in your fridge,” though admittedly it is less catchy. Another way to put it: the debate is real, the labels are not settled, and for now the cloned-food aisle remains more political drama than grocery reality.

    Sources:
    Health Canada consultation page — https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update.html
    Health Canada policy statement — https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update/policy-statement.html
    Global News — https://globalnews.ca/news/11527780/cloned-meat-food-supply-canada/
    duBreton news release — https://www.dubreton.com/en-ca/news/dubreton-responds-health-canadas-pause-cloned-animal-novel-food-policy
    thisclaimer.com — https://thisclaimer.com

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #art #books #Canada #clonedMeat #consumerTransparency #food #foodLabeling #foodRegulation #groceryNews #healthCanada #livestockCloning #novelFoods #photography #publicTrust #travel
  10. Canada’s cloned-food pause is not the same as a green light

    A Canadian food policy debate is raising one blunt question: should shoppers be told when cloning is part of the supply chain?

    Dear Cherubs, the viral version of this story is neat, dramatic, and a little too eager to jump the queue. Health Canada did propose changing how foods from cloned cattle and swine are regulated, but the department later said it had indefinitely paused the update after receiving significant feedback from consumers and industry. As of that Nov. 19 update, cloned-cattle and cloned-swine foods still remain subject to the novel-food assessment, and Health Canada says there are currently no approved cloned products on the Canadian market.

    WHAT ACTUALLY CHANGED

    The proposal came out of a 2023 scientific opinion that concluded foods derived from healthy cloned cattle and swine, and their offspring, are as safe and nutritious as foods from traditionally bred animals. On that basis, Health Canada proposed removing those foods from the “novel food” category, which would have ended the pre-market notification route for those products under the Food and Drug Regulations. In bureaucratic English, that is less “new food on the shelf tomorrow” and more “we may stop treating these items like regulatory special guests.”

    The proposal was also described by Health Canada as consistent with the interpretation of other trusted jurisdictions, including the United States, Europe, Japan, and New Zealand. That matters because food regulators love a good international confidence boost almost as much as they love a consultation document. Still, Health Canada’s current position is the pause button, not the checkout button.

    WHY PEOPLE ARE SIDE-EYEING IT

    The backlash makes sense. Global News reported that critics worried consumers could end up buying cloned-animal products without labels, while duBreton, a Quebec pork producer, publicly pushed for mandatory labeling and transparency. This is not really a food-poisoning panic; it is a trust-and-choice argument, which is arguably even more awkward for regulators because it cannot be solved with a lab coat and a press release.

    Supporters of the proposal have a different line: if the science says the food is as safe and nutritious as conventional meat, then cloned-origin products should not need a separate treatment forever. That position is reflected in Health Canada’s own consultation materials, which say the policy update was being considered because the science underpinned a conclusion of safety.

    The real headache is that food regulation is never just about chemistry. It is about whether shoppers feel informed, whether brands can protect their reputation, and whether “same as conventional” still sounds reassuring when the origin story is doing cartwheels in the background. As noted by thisclaimer.com, the bigger issue is not simply what is in the package, but whether people believe they are being told the full story.

    So the honest read is this: Canada did not quietly unleash cloned meat and dairy on an unsuspecting public. It proposed a policy change, the public noticed, and Health Canada hit pause. That is a very different story from “it is already in your fridge,” though admittedly it is less catchy. Another way to put it: the debate is real, the labels are not settled, and for now the cloned-food aisle remains more political drama than grocery reality.

    Sources:
    Health Canada consultation page — https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update.html
    Health Canada policy statement — https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update/policy-statement.html
    Global News — https://globalnews.ca/news/11527780/cloned-meat-food-supply-canada/
    duBreton news release — https://www.dubreton.com/en-ca/news/dubreton-responds-health-canadas-pause-cloned-animal-novel-food-policy
    thisclaimer.com — https://thisclaimer.com

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #art #books #Canada #clonedMeat #consumerTransparency #food #foodLabeling #foodRegulation #groceryNews #healthCanada #livestockCloning #novelFoods #photography #publicTrust #travel
  11. Canada’s cloned-food pause is not the same as a green light

    A Canadian food policy debate is raising one blunt question: should shoppers be told when cloning is part of the supply chain?

    Dear Cherubs, the viral version of this story is neat, dramatic, and a little too eager to jump the queue. Health Canada did propose changing how foods from cloned cattle and swine are regulated, but the department later said it had indefinitely paused the update after receiving significant feedback from consumers and industry. As of that Nov. 19 update, cloned-cattle and cloned-swine foods still remain subject to the novel-food assessment, and Health Canada says there are currently no approved cloned products on the Canadian market.

    WHAT ACTUALLY CHANGED

    The proposal came out of a 2023 scientific opinion that concluded foods derived from healthy cloned cattle and swine, and their offspring, are as safe and nutritious as foods from traditionally bred animals. On that basis, Health Canada proposed removing those foods from the “novel food” category, which would have ended the pre-market notification route for those products under the Food and Drug Regulations. In bureaucratic English, that is less “new food on the shelf tomorrow” and more “we may stop treating these items like regulatory special guests.”

    The proposal was also described by Health Canada as consistent with the interpretation of other trusted jurisdictions, including the United States, Europe, Japan, and New Zealand. That matters because food regulators love a good international confidence boost almost as much as they love a consultation document. Still, Health Canada’s current position is the pause button, not the checkout button.

    WHY PEOPLE ARE SIDE-EYEING IT

    The backlash makes sense. Global News reported that critics worried consumers could end up buying cloned-animal products without labels, while duBreton, a Quebec pork producer, publicly pushed for mandatory labeling and transparency. This is not really a food-poisoning panic; it is a trust-and-choice argument, which is arguably even more awkward for regulators because it cannot be solved with a lab coat and a press release.

    Supporters of the proposal have a different line: if the science says the food is as safe and nutritious as conventional meat, then cloned-origin products should not need a separate treatment forever. That position is reflected in Health Canada’s own consultation materials, which say the policy update was being considered because the science underpinned a conclusion of safety.

    The real headache is that food regulation is never just about chemistry. It is about whether shoppers feel informed, whether brands can protect their reputation, and whether “same as conventional” still sounds reassuring when the origin story is doing cartwheels in the background. As noted by thisclaimer.com, the bigger issue is not simply what is in the package, but whether people believe they are being told the full story.

    So the honest read is this: Canada did not quietly unleash cloned meat and dairy on an unsuspecting public. It proposed a policy change, the public noticed, and Health Canada hit pause. That is a very different story from “it is already in your fridge,” though admittedly it is less catchy. Another way to put it: the debate is real, the labels are not settled, and for now the cloned-food aisle remains more political drama than grocery reality.

    Sources:
    Health Canada consultation page — https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update.html
    Health Canada policy statement — https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update/policy-statement.html
    Global News — https://globalnews.ca/news/11527780/cloned-meat-food-supply-canada/
    duBreton news release — https://www.dubreton.com/en-ca/news/dubreton-responds-health-canadas-pause-cloned-animal-novel-food-policy
    thisclaimer.com — https://thisclaimer.com

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #art #books #Canada #clonedMeat #consumerTransparency #food #foodLabeling #foodRegulation #groceryNews #healthCanada #livestockCloning #novelFoods #photography #publicTrust #travel
  12. Canada’s cloned-food pause is not the same as a green light

    A Canadian food policy debate is raising one blunt question: should shoppers be told when cloning is part of the supply chain?

    Dear Cherubs, the viral version of this story is neat, dramatic, and a little too eager to jump the queue. Health Canada did propose changing how foods from cloned cattle and swine are regulated, but the department later said it had indefinitely paused the update after receiving significant feedback from consumers and industry. As of that Nov. 19 update, cloned-cattle and cloned-swine foods still remain subject to the novel-food assessment, and Health Canada says there are currently no approved cloned products on the Canadian market.

    WHAT ACTUALLY CHANGED

    The proposal came out of a 2023 scientific opinion that concluded foods derived from healthy cloned cattle and swine, and their offspring, are as safe and nutritious as foods from traditionally bred animals. On that basis, Health Canada proposed removing those foods from the “novel food” category, which would have ended the pre-market notification route for those products under the Food and Drug Regulations. In bureaucratic English, that is less “new food on the shelf tomorrow” and more “we may stop treating these items like regulatory special guests.”

    The proposal was also described by Health Canada as consistent with the interpretation of other trusted jurisdictions, including the United States, Europe, Japan, and New Zealand. That matters because food regulators love a good international confidence boost almost as much as they love a consultation document. Still, Health Canada’s current position is the pause button, not the checkout button.

    WHY PEOPLE ARE SIDE-EYEING IT

    The backlash makes sense. Global News reported that critics worried consumers could end up buying cloned-animal products without labels, while duBreton, a Quebec pork producer, publicly pushed for mandatory labeling and transparency. This is not really a food-poisoning panic; it is a trust-and-choice argument, which is arguably even more awkward for regulators because it cannot be solved with a lab coat and a press release.

    Supporters of the proposal have a different line: if the science says the food is as safe and nutritious as conventional meat, then cloned-origin products should not need a separate treatment forever. That position is reflected in Health Canada’s own consultation materials, which say the policy update was being considered because the science underpinned a conclusion of safety.

    The real headache is that food regulation is never just about chemistry. It is about whether shoppers feel informed, whether brands can protect their reputation, and whether “same as conventional” still sounds reassuring when the origin story is doing cartwheels in the background. As noted by thisclaimer.com, the bigger issue is not simply what is in the package, but whether people believe they are being told the full story.

    So the honest read is this: Canada did not quietly unleash cloned meat and dairy on an unsuspecting public. It proposed a policy change, the public noticed, and Health Canada hit pause. That is a very different story from “it is already in your fridge,” though admittedly it is less catchy. Another way to put it: the debate is real, the labels are not settled, and for now the cloned-food aisle remains more political drama than grocery reality.

    Sources:
    Health Canada consultation page — https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update.html
    Health Canada policy statement — https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update/policy-statement.html
    Global News — https://globalnews.ca/news/11527780/cloned-meat-food-supply-canada/
    duBreton news release — https://www.dubreton.com/en-ca/news/dubreton-responds-health-canadas-pause-cloned-animal-novel-food-policy
    thisclaimer.com — https://thisclaimer.com

    The Thisclaimer logo blends a classic warning symbol with a brain icon to represent critical thinking, curiosity, and thoughtful disclaimers. #art #books #Canada #clonedMeat #consumerTransparency #food #foodLabeling #foodRegulation #groceryNews #healthCanada #livestockCloning #novelFoods #photography #publicTrust #travel
  13. The EU’s veggie ‘burger’ ban is also coming for Spain’s fish steaks.

    As the debate over which proteins can be labelled “hamburger” and “steak” swirls across Brussels, no one is talking about how it would play out in the other 23 languages of the bloc.

    In Spanish, for example, the translated term for “steak” —a word the ban says can only apply to meat products— is “filete,” often used for cuts of fish.

    mediafaro.org/article/20251117

    #Meat #Seafood #FoodLabeling #Food #Vegan #Language #Spain #Spanish

  14. The EU’s veggie ‘burger’ ban is also coming for Spain’s fish steaks.

    As the debate over which proteins can be labelled “hamburger” and “steak” swirls across Brussels, no one is talking about how it would play out in the other 23 languages of the bloc.

    In Spanish, for example, the translated term for “steak” —a word the ban says can only apply to meat products— is “filete,” often used for cuts of fish.

    mediafaro.org/article/20251117

    #Meat #Seafood #FoodLabeling #Food #Vegan #Language #Spain #Spanish

  15. The EU’s veggie ‘burger’ ban is also coming for Spain’s fish steaks.

    As the debate over which proteins can be labelled “hamburger” and “steak” swirls across Brussels, no one is talking about how it would play out in the other 23 languages of the bloc.

    In Spanish, for example, the translated term for “steak” —a word the ban says can only apply to meat products— is “filete,” often used for cuts of fish.

    mediafaro.org/article/20251117

    #Meat #Seafood #FoodLabeling #Food #Vegan #Language #Spain #Spanish

  16. I read the sign.

    "ALL NAUTRAL
    ORGANIC
    FREE RANGE
    BGH FREE
    LOW CALORIE
    BLACK ANGUS
    SHEET METAL"

    "Literally none of those have anything to do with sheet metal," I pointed out to the vendor.

    "They don't mean a damn thing for food, either," he chomped his toothpick. "You buyin'?"

    I did have some home project ideas.

    #TootFic #SmallStories #MicroFiction #FoodLabeling

  17. I read the sign.

    "ALL NAUTRAL
    ORGANIC
    FREE RANGE
    BGH FREE
    LOW CALORIE
    BLACK ANGUS
    SHEET METAL"

    "Literally none of those have anything to do with sheet metal," I pointed out to the vendor.

    "They don't mean a damn thing for food, either," he chomped his toothpick. "You buyin'?"

    I did have some home project ideas.

    #TootFic #SmallStories #MicroFiction #FoodLabeling

  18. I read the sign.

    "ALL NAUTRAL
    ORGANIC
    FREE RANGE
    BGH FREE
    LOW CALORIE
    BLACK ANGUS
    SHEET METAL"

    "Literally none of those have anything to do with sheet metal," I pointed out to the vendor.

    "They don't mean a damn thing for food, either," he chomped his toothpick. "You buyin'?"

    I did have some home project ideas.

    #TootFic #SmallStories #MicroFiction #FoodLabeling

  19. I read the sign.

    "ALL NAUTRAL
    ORGANIC
    FREE RANGE
    BGH FREE
    LOW CALORIE
    BLACK ANGUS
    SHEET METAL"

    "Literally none of those have anything to do with sheet metal," I pointed out to the vendor.

    "They don't mean a damn thing for food, either," he chomped his toothpick. "You buyin'?"

    I did have some home project ideas.

    #TootFic #SmallStories #MicroFiction #FoodLabeling

  20. 🌍🌾 Ways forward for future #EU food labeling: A ZALF study shows how innovative food labeling can better inform consumers and include more stakeholder perspectives. 🌱🛒
    #foodlabeling
    zalf.de/en/aktuelles/Pages/Pre

    @qris

  21. 🌍🌾 Ways forward for future #EU food labeling: A ZALF study shows how innovative food labeling can better inform consumers and include more stakeholder perspectives. 🌱🛒
    #foodlabeling
    zalf.de/en/aktuelles/Pages/Pre

    @qris

  22. 🌍🌾 Ways forward for future #EU food labeling: A ZALF study shows how innovative food labeling can better inform consumers and include more stakeholder perspectives. 🌱🛒
    #foodlabeling
    zalf.de/en/aktuelles/Pages/Pre

    @qris

  23. 1/2
    Had a friend who sold mobile phone plans door to door.

    The advertising brochure featured the bold claim, in large print,
    "100% Company".

    I note that #MetaMucil "Natural Granular" has "Multi-Health Fibre with 100% NATURAL PSYLLIUM" in a formulation that contains "Psyllium husk powder 3.4 g per 7 g dose".

    And the labels reads also,
    Active ingredients: Psyllium husk powder 3.4 g per 7 g dose

    #FoodLabeling #FoodLabelingLaws #ConsumerInformation

  24. 1/2
    Had a friend who sold mobile phone plans door to door.

    The advertising brochure featured the bold claim, in large print,
    "100% Company".

    I note that #MetaMucil "Natural Granular" has "Multi-Health Fibre with 100% NATURAL PSYLLIUM" in a formulation that contains "Psyllium husk powder 3.4 g per 7 g dose".

    And the labels reads also,
    Active ingredients: Psyllium husk powder 3.4 g per 7 g dose

    #FoodLabeling #FoodLabelingLaws #ConsumerInformation

  25. 1/2
    Had a friend who sold mobile phone plans door to door.

    The advertising brochure featured the bold claim, in large print,
    "100% Company".

    I note that #MetaMucil "Natural Granular" has "Multi-Health Fibre with 100% NATURAL PSYLLIUM" in a formulation that contains "Psyllium husk powder 3.4 g per 7 g dose".

    And the labels reads also,
    Active ingredients: Psyllium husk powder 3.4 g per 7 g dose

    #FoodLabeling #FoodLabelingLaws #ConsumerInformation

  26. 1/2
    Had a friend who sold mobile phone plans door to door.

    The advertising brochure featured the bold claim, in large print,
    "100% Company".

    I note that #MetaMucil "Natural Granular" has "Multi-Health Fibre with 100% NATURAL PSYLLIUM" in a formulation that contains "Psyllium husk powder 3.4 g per 7 g dose".

    And the labels reads also,
    Active ingredients: Psyllium husk powder 3.4 g per 7 g dose

    #FoodLabeling #FoodLabelingLaws #ConsumerInformation

  27. On my grocery trip this morning, I decided to buy maple syrup. I got to the spot where it is and right next to it there was an "all natural" syrup... cheaper.... but it is... ahem... table syrup.

    :catangry:

    Yeah yea yeah. I know the spiel. All the ingredients are "natural" therefore they can call the combination "natural." There's no way you can tap a tree and get that combination of "natural" ingredients, however. Maple syrup is natural in a way that this table syrup isn't. (Yes, I did check the ingredient list.)

    Of course, I got the real maple syrup. I live in the US, but I'm from Québec, and Québec is the top producer of maple syrup. I have cousins that produce the stuff.

    Whenever I get that stupid "table syrup" substitute, it feels like an insult.

    I don't think I bought maple syrup since separating from my ex-wife.

    #groceries #MapleSyrup #TableSyrup #natural #FoodLabeling #Québec

  28. On my grocery trip this morning, I decided to buy maple syrup. I got to the spot where it is and right next to it there was an "all natural" syrup... cheaper.... but it is... ahem... table syrup.

    :catangry:

    Yeah yea yeah. I know the spiel. All the ingredients are "natural" therefore they can call the combination "natural." There's no way you can tap a tree and get that combination of "natural" ingredients, however. Maple syrup is natural in a way that this table syrup isn't. (Yes, I did check the ingredient list.)

    Of course, I got the real maple syrup. I live in the US, but I'm from Québec, and Québec is the top producer of maple syrup. I have cousins that produce the stuff.

    Whenever I get that stupid "table syrup" substitute, it feels like an insult.

    I don't think I bought maple syrup since separating from my ex-wife.

    #groceries #MapleSyrup #TableSyrup #natural #FoodLabeling #Québec

  29. On my grocery trip this morning, I decided to buy maple syrup. I got to the spot where it is and right next to it there was an "all natural" syrup... cheaper.... but it is... ahem... table syrup.

    :catangry:

    Yeah yea yeah. I know the spiel. All the ingredients are "natural" therefore they can call the combination "natural." There's no way you can tap a tree and get that combination of "natural" ingredients, however. Maple syrup is natural in a way that this table syrup isn't. (Yes, I did check the ingredient list.)

    Of course, I got the real maple syrup. I live in the US, but I'm from Québec, and Québec is the top producer of maple syrup. I have cousins that produce the stuff.

    Whenever I get that stupid "table syrup" substitute, it feels like an insult.

    I don't think I bought maple syrup since separating from my ex-wife.

    #groceries #MapleSyrup #TableSyrup #natural #FoodLabeling #Québec

  30. On my grocery trip this morning, I decided to buy maple syrup. I got to the spot where it is and right next to it there was an "all natural" syrup... cheaper.... but it is... ahem... table syrup.

    :catangry:

    Yeah yea yeah. I know the spiel. All the ingredients are "natural" therefore they can call the combination "natural." There's no way you can tap a tree and get that combination of "natural" ingredients, however. Maple syrup is natural in a way that this table syrup isn't. (Yes, I did check the ingredient list.)

    Of course, I got the real maple syrup. I live in the US, but I'm from Québec, and Québec is the top producer of maple syrup. I have cousins that produce the stuff.

    Whenever I get that stupid "table syrup" substitute, it feels like an insult.

    I don't think I bought maple syrup since separating from my ex-wife.

    #groceries #MapleSyrup #TableSyrup #natural #FoodLabeling #Québec

  31. and Threaten to Block “Healthy” Guidelines in
    The ’s proposed labeling requirement is facing backlash from companies, and food industry claiming the rule limits their .
    theintercept.com/2023/03/01/fd

  32. @bplein Oh, you'll know once you accidentally bite into something made from poseur flour!

    #FoodLabeling #JokesAboutFood

  33. @bplein Oh, you'll know once you accidentally bite into something made from poseur flour!

    #FoodLabeling #JokesAboutFood

  34. @bplein Oh, you'll know once you accidentally bite into something made from poseur flour!

    #FoodLabeling #JokesAboutFood

  35. FDA’s rotten definition of “healthy” food is finally getting tossed - Enlarge (credit: Getty | REDA&CO)

    The US Food and Drug Adm... - arstechnica.com/?p=1885776 #foodlabeling #nutrition #science #fda

  36. Children poisoned by birthday cake decorations loaded with lead, copper - Enlarge / Baby first birthday cake with lit candle. (credit: Getty )
    ... - arstechnica.com/?p=1808912 #foodlabeling #heavymetals #poisoning #children #science #copper #toxic #cake #lead #cdc #fda #nih

  37. Judge serves up sizzling rebuke of Arkansas’ anti-veggie-meat labeling law - Enlarge / Tofurky's bourbon glazed ham. (credit: Tofurky)
    A federal judge on Tuesday roasted Arka... more: arstechnica.com/?p=1631963 #meatalternatives #foodlabeling #veggieburger #veggiemeat #arkansas #science #tofurky #aclu