#familysharing — Public Fediverse posts on home.social

Public Enemy Exposed @[email protected] · 2026-04-06 · 15:02 UTC

just wondering why Apple would list 'slopdetective.kagi.com' as a restricted website, while trying to install the App for a 9-yr old child.

Besides the Family Sharing 'feature' being an absolute nightmare, like the rest of iOS / iPadOS - if you allow the website, you first need to restart your kid's device for the change to work 🤦🤬, like so many other things.

#Apple #iOS #iPadOS #iPhone #iPad #FamilySharing #nightmare #disaster #ChildProtection #Parenting @kagihq

#apple #ios #ipados #iphone #ipad #familysharing

Public Enemy Exposed @[email protected] · 2026-03-26 · 12:48 UTC

iOS Parents out there - do you also face a problem when you set App time-limits for the Kids, that the usage time continues running, even though they paused a video or stopped using an App to take a break or have a meal?

Any workaround?

#iOS #FamilySharing #ScreenTime #Parents #Parenting #Kids #Children

#ios #familysharing #screentime #parents #parenting #kids

DoRaleigh @[email protected] · 2025-10-29 · 20:48 UTC

How a Flaw in Apple’s Family Sharing Can Be Weaponized in Custody Disputes

The Hidden Risk Behind a Convenient Feature

Apple’s Family Sharing system promises simplicity: one organizer manages purchases, subscriptions, and parental controls for the whole family. But that simplicity hides a troubling flaw — one that can be exploited when relationships turn toxic.

Under the current design, only the designated organizer has full administrative control. The other parent — even if marked as a “guardian” — cannot remove children, delete the family group, or transfer them to a new one. That means when a marriage or partnership ends, the organizer keeps the power, even if they no longer have legal custody.

💔 When Technology Enables Control

Wired recently profiled Kate (a pseudonym), a mother who experienced this firsthand. When her marriage ended, her ex-husband, still listed as the organizer, refused to disband their family group. From there, he:

Monitored the children’s locations Set strict screen time limits during Kate’s custody days Lifted those limits during his own

Despite having a court order naming her the custodial parent, Apple told Kate it could not intervene. Only the organizer could release the accounts. The alternative — abandoning existing Apple IDs and starting over — would mean losing years of data, photos, and app purchases.

⚠️ A Design Flaw with Real-World Consequences

What seems like a small technical limitation has major implications for survivors of domestic abuse and coercive control. Experts argue Apple must introduce:

Dual-organizer roles, allowing both parents equal authority A verified custody transfer process, especially in family court cases Safety-mode protocols for survivors exiting shared digital systems

Without such changes, Apple’s convenience feature risks becoming a digital weapon in abusive dynamics.

💬 The Broader Lesson

Technology isn’t neutral when power is uneven. Tools like Family Sharing, built for harmony, can unintentionally entrench control in the wrong hands. Until companies design for these realities, victims will continue to pay the price — not just emotionally, but digitally.

Follow DoRaleigh.com for daily updates on government meetings, local festivals, and community happenings — your one-stop guide to everything Raleigh!

Follow Us: Instagram | Facebook | BSky | Linkedin

Here is a link to the Source Article on 9To5Mac

#Apple #CustodyRights #DigitalSafety #FamilySharing #News #Privacy #TechAbuse #Technology

#apple #custodyrights #digitalsafety #familysharing #news #privacy