home.social

#enigmatick — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #enigmatick, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Anatomy of an E2EE ActivityPub Note in Enigmatick

    Over the break I spent some time revamping my structs and enums for handling #E2EE #ActivityPub exchanges. This is what I have at the moment for the initial Create from the client (this is subject to change).

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Create",
      "actor": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
      "to": [
        "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
      ],
      "cc": [],
      "object": {
        "mediaType": "message/mls",
        "encoding": "base64",
        "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
        "type": "Note",
        "to": [
          "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
        ],
        "cc": [],
        "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
        "content": "AAEAAhDIkTdahK5U3s1SQBbA2fIvAAAAAAAAAAEBABzHJj3+WZDE3Hw6H5W9YNhE3bhDSyExL4tnn0E5QOvPUeOgYdo/2n+rGUI1M8wupeK2bt919jAs8yTj2awvBAsprxAInHm8qWgq2FER2xjcpAx9f42ncAL8Xehfy3v6vonGuAPkYteAzdFCC8mGWxg3slpI+VoPrSWThSKqjMNxttZSfvbnhEFYw0jUFmJwxOecDS8n3UVjuLDt14V0Fw9YMv+XXUgKj9bWaCPi0qhuatcgxCqXwXzpevJBhY0trbPZgjB8LlhC/zcx5NNLI9WJtCF9zq3RPkG6ByPdH6IWTH5drOJyvefILElybP4eGMSoGWZATmGUQm/k3iKG6tRyzMM/fHxpIz34",
        "tag": [
          {
            "type": "Mention",
            "name": "[at][email protected]",
            "href": "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
          }
        ],
        "attachment": []
      },
      "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
      "instrument": [
        {
          "type": "VaultItem",
          "content": "oAjN0c2+q5gCtrFlauGU1kbKGizm5a5pH+iY5cObdihVBjjsSiSbkeu6XQ7/RR4lcn0OIqS9O+MVJ0QyympRxt7JI9qzCGlkCFcAyp4oe8nhh/YG7WHoLWL272vPqlq8A/Yf0YFprhIBlU48sJF6A1iRlU4fEBaRwnwV4gniSCQr55jpDe++M/HD3bSFJNcvpmf5BH9G4Z3VBaB8HMnDECGzFrB8zFycAR0w1SNYbGJuXFsopfMb4EfPkZoHT28="
        },
        {
          "type": "Welcome",
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "AAFAmCDd32lw8FF8QC6uFjAHr3mgvxBPjuGV1Pssxx+h5CNhcCAv4/tP+dWUbCq6L4A+aMr+L1uP3Xkusb4ea2H80EgFOUBUqHDCdGzjAhZdLCrjE0kM/aou36ZSZc0ahftKmE07chTiMUo8FgIj12deS4A0l3sXAR8x724HeigtyObI1GK7fxMGXU5oWemHGhS1unxK6XVyiuqvQriKP+VJPZa6JzN3Yb4r4l9B5jUfNUc5gX3XvzkzcO57Exj8SgpTTygo2zBTOPQ+6steYycUA70ed3LPKEfSCllIWeWAV+J+EFh7ywm90XFYzaPrXVudIx3orRzVMFnIldLax3oHUW5uXIrGQ06JWfgdOQ6DByb2iy/Dw4zJlbZP1oJptBTgO19IqUQaz58wrWDBSiYIT3h1jOXE3GvJgeeQIiW78noO5MF3xI3WRXB4C0cttyKm7Od2CBOk1USo+TDLCevnmExhlKlVTobTMMI4xZ1vVCdYpnb0k9rO7coVKPueBqVg2mE20GS/IoRG0v8+h0xUKIgsbYua41krjXoB5hctX4kH3lRO+qERkoXEcLVxRJuyeZEGsk4XrJ18AigU1a8gB6cZZ5LyvcV756yelu6F6MRQKba6zawDLOn4Takm3Lr3urfWo5Br7DBZcigMVjzGn8MhLSIEMhv6Ehmqajj9Vl6sTnpi90tVYWUtKO1buPrk3AiXrsbnEoNubqCs1sVmA93/Z0CcE8GQa1dO7NywofSV4/ax/tmBCZEoU6/uL7ygZHt8ZvSyd6wniPCR6sfd4ys4O8C7qW1KKFtEBbb1lMre494ZeXI5v0sG7MwbwFtI3d2uRHtWZ8v9khGr1ds4AFz3QnvoMSUtsR2kvq+C6H45kUs2ae957+txpKt5MDrcmK+CTTcX/FhlAtib4mlbs+Aj4WJFLOkXuB+MlHOMBlMz3ndJ5I3GDbo+VQvdJC2mCUOBWraihOV92mQQHi2gLXAA1NSsZIjXgnyVSYsrUvNJgTvw+AOVmJ7q5tXENPlZoOKUjSB3fEmKlywf90EQLUjDpphnYtvdFz8Oh8Vbgze+QAQp2VVYImI+1voBErK1EMKqEDFz1DC1CWUzqhl3k2pMgx00JhP3ZZpbX7YtjRmLjJM="
        }
      ]
    }
    

    The mention of mls-tester has an [at] to avoid triggering my automatic webfinger resolution.

    I've adopted the mediaType and encoding attributes from the draft ActivityPub specification. And I've standardized the Welcome message to incorporate those.

    The Create includes the Welcome and a VaultItem as instruments rather than being sent as separate activities. The Welcome can include any number of recipients, so one within the activity should be sufficient.

    The VaultItem is specific to the #Enigmatick client and isn't intended to be federated. That's how I'm handling ongoing access to the decrypted data; the VaultItem is a symmetrically encrypted representation of the original content that can be safely stored on the server for repeated use by the client. I'll need to eventually update the @context with that extension.

  2. Anatomy of an E2EE ActivityPub Note in Enigmatick

    Over the break I spent some time revamping my structs and enums for handling #E2EE #ActivityPub exchanges. This is what I have at the moment for the initial Create from the client (this is subject to change).

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Create",
      "actor": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
      "to": [
        "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
      ],
      "cc": [],
      "object": {
        "mediaType": "message/mls",
        "encoding": "base64",
        "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
        "type": "Note",
        "to": [
          "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
        ],
        "cc": [],
        "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
        "content": "AAEAAhDIkTdahK5U3s1SQBbA2fIvAAAAAAAAAAEBABzHJj3+WZDE3Hw6H5W9YNhE3bhDSyExL4tnn0E5QOvPUeOgYdo/2n+rGUI1M8wupeK2bt919jAs8yTj2awvBAsprxAInHm8qWgq2FER2xjcpAx9f42ncAL8Xehfy3v6vonGuAPkYteAzdFCC8mGWxg3slpI+VoPrSWThSKqjMNxttZSfvbnhEFYw0jUFmJwxOecDS8n3UVjuLDt14V0Fw9YMv+XXUgKj9bWaCPi0qhuatcgxCqXwXzpevJBhY0trbPZgjB8LlhC/zcx5NNLI9WJtCF9zq3RPkG6ByPdH6IWTH5drOJyvefILElybP4eGMSoGWZATmGUQm/k3iKG6tRyzMM/fHxpIz34",
        "tag": [
          {
            "type": "Mention",
            "name": "[at][email protected]",
            "href": "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
          }
        ],
        "attachment": []
      },
      "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
      "instrument": [
        {
          "type": "VaultItem",
          "content": "oAjN0c2+q5gCtrFlauGU1kbKGizm5a5pH+iY5cObdihVBjjsSiSbkeu6XQ7/RR4lcn0OIqS9O+MVJ0QyympRxt7JI9qzCGlkCFcAyp4oe8nhh/YG7WHoLWL272vPqlq8A/Yf0YFprhIBlU48sJF6A1iRlU4fEBaRwnwV4gniSCQr55jpDe++M/HD3bSFJNcvpmf5BH9G4Z3VBaB8HMnDECGzFrB8zFycAR0w1SNYbGJuXFsopfMb4EfPkZoHT28="
        },
        {
          "type": "Welcome",
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "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"
        }
      ]
    }
    

    The mention of mls-tester has an [at] to avoid triggering my automatic webfinger resolution.

    I've adopted the mediaType and encoding attributes from the draft ActivityPub specification. And I've standardized the Welcome message to incorporate those.

    The Create includes the Welcome and a VaultItem as instruments rather than being sent as separate activities. The Welcome can include any number of recipients, so one within the activity should be sufficient.

    The VaultItem is specific to the #Enigmatick client and isn't intended to be federated. That's how I'm handling ongoing access to the decrypted data; the VaultItem is a symmetrically encrypted representation of the original content that can be safely stored on the server for repeated use by the client. I'll need to eventually update the @context with that extension.

  3. Anatomy of an E2EE ActivityPub Note in Enigmatick

    Over the break I spent some time revamping my structs and enums for handling #E2EE #ActivityPub exchanges. This is what I have at the moment for the initial Create from the client (this is subject to change).

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Create",
      "actor": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
      "to": [
        "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
      ],
      "cc": [],
      "object": {
        "mediaType": "message/mls",
        "encoding": "base64",
        "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
        "type": "Note",
        "to": [
          "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
        ],
        "cc": [],
        "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
        "content": "AAEAAhDIkTdahK5U3s1SQBbA2fIvAAAAAAAAAAEBABzHJj3+WZDE3Hw6H5W9YNhE3bhDSyExL4tnn0E5QOvPUeOgYdo/2n+rGUI1M8wupeK2bt919jAs8yTj2awvBAsprxAInHm8qWgq2FER2xjcpAx9f42ncAL8Xehfy3v6vonGuAPkYteAzdFCC8mGWxg3slpI+VoPrSWThSKqjMNxttZSfvbnhEFYw0jUFmJwxOecDS8n3UVjuLDt14V0Fw9YMv+XXUgKj9bWaCPi0qhuatcgxCqXwXzpevJBhY0trbPZgjB8LlhC/zcx5NNLI9WJtCF9zq3RPkG6ByPdH6IWTH5drOJyvefILElybP4eGMSoGWZATmGUQm/k3iKG6tRyzMM/fHxpIz34",
        "tag": [
          {
            "type": "Mention",
            "name": "[at][email protected]",
            "href": "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
          }
        ],
        "attachment": []
      },
      "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
      "instrument": [
        {
          "type": "VaultItem",
          "content": "oAjN0c2+q5gCtrFlauGU1kbKGizm5a5pH+iY5cObdihVBjjsSiSbkeu6XQ7/RR4lcn0OIqS9O+MVJ0QyympRxt7JI9qzCGlkCFcAyp4oe8nhh/YG7WHoLWL272vPqlq8A/Yf0YFprhIBlU48sJF6A1iRlU4fEBaRwnwV4gniSCQr55jpDe++M/HD3bSFJNcvpmf5BH9G4Z3VBaB8HMnDECGzFrB8zFycAR0w1SNYbGJuXFsopfMb4EfPkZoHT28="
        },
        {
          "type": "Welcome",
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "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"
        }
      ]
    }
    

    The mention of mls-tester has an [at] to avoid triggering my automatic webfinger resolution.

    I've adopted the mediaType and encoding attributes from the draft ActivityPub specification. And I've standardized the Welcome message to incorporate those.

    The Create includes the Welcome and a VaultItem as instruments rather than being sent as separate activities. The Welcome can include any number of recipients, so one within the activity should be sufficient.

    The VaultItem is specific to the #Enigmatick client and isn't intended to be federated. That's how I'm handling ongoing access to the decrypted data; the VaultItem is a symmetrically encrypted representation of the original content that can be safely stored on the server for repeated use by the client. I'll need to eventually update the @context with that extension.

  4. Anatomy of an E2EE ActivityPub Note in Enigmatick

    Over the break I spent some time revamping my structs and enums for handling #E2EE #ActivityPub exchanges. This is what I have at the moment for the initial Create from the client (this is subject to change).

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Create",
      "actor": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
      "to": [
        "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
      ],
      "cc": [],
      "object": {
        "mediaType": "message/mls",
        "encoding": "base64",
        "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
        "type": "Note",
        "to": [
          "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
        ],
        "cc": [],
        "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
        "content": "AAEAAhDIkTdahK5U3s1SQBbA2fIvAAAAAAAAAAEBABzHJj3+WZDE3Hw6H5W9YNhE3bhDSyExL4tnn0E5QOvPUeOgYdo/2n+rGUI1M8wupeK2bt919jAs8yTj2awvBAsprxAInHm8qWgq2FER2xjcpAx9f42ncAL8Xehfy3v6vonGuAPkYteAzdFCC8mGWxg3slpI+VoPrSWThSKqjMNxttZSfvbnhEFYw0jUFmJwxOecDS8n3UVjuLDt14V0Fw9YMv+XXUgKj9bWaCPi0qhuatcgxCqXwXzpevJBhY0trbPZgjB8LlhC/zcx5NNLI9WJtCF9zq3RPkG6ByPdH6IWTH5drOJyvefILElybP4eGMSoGWZATmGUQm/k3iKG6tRyzMM/fHxpIz34",
        "tag": [
          {
            "type": "Mention",
            "name": "[at][email protected]",
            "href": "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
          }
        ],
        "attachment": []
      },
      "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
      "instrument": [
        {
          "type": "VaultItem",
          "content": "oAjN0c2+q5gCtrFlauGU1kbKGizm5a5pH+iY5cObdihVBjjsSiSbkeu6XQ7/RR4lcn0OIqS9O+MVJ0QyympRxt7JI9qzCGlkCFcAyp4oe8nhh/YG7WHoLWL272vPqlq8A/Yf0YFprhIBlU48sJF6A1iRlU4fEBaRwnwV4gniSCQr55jpDe++M/HD3bSFJNcvpmf5BH9G4Z3VBaB8HMnDECGzFrB8zFycAR0w1SNYbGJuXFsopfMb4EfPkZoHT28="
        },
        {
          "type": "Welcome",
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "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"
        }
      ]
    }
    

    The mention of mls-tester has an [at] to avoid triggering my automatic webfinger resolution.

    I've adopted the mediaType and encoding attributes from the draft ActivityPub specification. And I've standardized the Welcome message to incorporate those.

    The Create includes the Welcome and a VaultItem as instruments rather than being sent as separate activities. The Welcome can include any number of recipients, so one within the activity should be sufficient.

    The VaultItem is specific to the #Enigmatick client and isn't intended to be federated. That's how I'm handling ongoing access to the decrypted data; the VaultItem is a symmetrically encrypted representation of the original content that can be safely stored on the server for repeated use by the client. I'll need to eventually update the @context with that extension.

  5. Anatomy of an E2EE ActivityPub Note in Enigmatick

    Over the break I spent some time revamping my structs and enums for handling #E2EE #ActivityPub exchanges. This is what I have at the moment for the initial Create from the client (this is subject to change).

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Create",
      "actor": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
      "to": [
        "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
      ],
      "cc": [],
      "object": {
        "mediaType": "message/mls",
        "encoding": "base64",
        "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
        "type": "Note",
        "to": [
          "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
        ],
        "cc": [],
        "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
        "content": "AAEAAhDIkTdahK5U3s1SQBbA2fIvAAAAAAAAAAEBABzHJj3+WZDE3Hw6H5W9YNhE3bhDSyExL4tnn0E5QOvPUeOgYdo/2n+rGUI1M8wupeK2bt919jAs8yTj2awvBAsprxAInHm8qWgq2FER2xjcpAx9f42ncAL8Xehfy3v6vonGuAPkYteAzdFCC8mGWxg3slpI+VoPrSWThSKqjMNxttZSfvbnhEFYw0jUFmJwxOecDS8n3UVjuLDt14V0Fw9YMv+XXUgKj9bWaCPi0qhuatcgxCqXwXzpevJBhY0trbPZgjB8LlhC/zcx5NNLI9WJtCF9zq3RPkG6ByPdH6IWTH5drOJyvefILElybP4eGMSoGWZATmGUQm/k3iKG6tRyzMM/fHxpIz34",
        "tag": [
          {
            "type": "Mention",
            "name": "[at][email protected]",
            "href": "https://enigmatick.social/user/mls-tester"
          }
        ],
        "attachment": []
      },
      "published": "2025-12-29T21:11:17Z",
      "instrument": [
        {
          "type": "VaultItem",
          "content": "oAjN0c2+q5gCtrFlauGU1kbKGizm5a5pH+iY5cObdihVBjjsSiSbkeu6XQ7/RR4lcn0OIqS9O+MVJ0QyympRxt7JI9qzCGlkCFcAyp4oe8nhh/YG7WHoLWL272vPqlq8A/Yf0YFprhIBlU48sJF6A1iRlU4fEBaRwnwV4gniSCQr55jpDe++M/HD3bSFJNcvpmf5BH9G4Z3VBaB8HMnDECGzFrB8zFycAR0w1SNYbGJuXFsopfMb4EfPkZoHT28="
        },
        {
          "type": "Welcome",
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "AAFAmCDd32lw8FF8QC6uFjAHr3mgvxBPjuGV1Pssxx+h5CNhcCAv4/tP+dWUbCq6L4A+aMr+L1uP3Xkusb4ea2H80EgFOUBUqHDCdGzjAhZdLCrjE0kM/aou36ZSZc0ahftKmE07chTiMUo8FgIj12deS4A0l3sXAR8x724HeigtyObI1GK7fxMGXU5oWemHGhS1unxK6XVyiuqvQriKP+VJPZa6JzN3Yb4r4l9B5jUfNUc5gX3XvzkzcO57Exj8SgpTTygo2zBTOPQ+6steYycUA70ed3LPKEfSCllIWeWAV+J+EFh7ywm90XFYzaPrXVudIx3orRzVMFnIldLax3oHUW5uXIrGQ06JWfgdOQ6DByb2iy/Dw4zJlbZP1oJptBTgO19IqUQaz58wrWDBSiYIT3h1jOXE3GvJgeeQIiW78noO5MF3xI3WRXB4C0cttyKm7Od2CBOk1USo+TDLCevnmExhlKlVTobTMMI4xZ1vVCdYpnb0k9rO7coVKPueBqVg2mE20GS/IoRG0v8+h0xUKIgsbYua41krjXoB5hctX4kH3lRO+qERkoXEcLVxRJuyeZEGsk4XrJ18AigU1a8gB6cZZ5LyvcV756yelu6F6MRQKba6zawDLOn4Takm3Lr3urfWo5Br7DBZcigMVjzGn8MhLSIEMhv6Ehmqajj9Vl6sTnpi90tVYWUtKO1buPrk3AiXrsbnEoNubqCs1sVmA93/Z0CcE8GQa1dO7NywofSV4/ax/tmBCZEoU6/uL7ygZHt8ZvSyd6wniPCR6sfd4ys4O8C7qW1KKFtEBbb1lMre494ZeXI5v0sG7MwbwFtI3d2uRHtWZ8v9khGr1ds4AFz3QnvoMSUtsR2kvq+C6H45kUs2ae957+txpKt5MDrcmK+CTTcX/FhlAtib4mlbs+Aj4WJFLOkXuB+MlHOMBlMz3ndJ5I3GDbo+VQvdJC2mCUOBWraihOV92mQQHi2gLXAA1NSsZIjXgnyVSYsrUvNJgTvw+AOVmJ7q5tXENPlZoOKUjSB3fEmKlywf90EQLUjDpphnYtvdFz8Oh8Vbgze+QAQp2VVYImI+1voBErK1EMKqEDFz1DC1CWUzqhl3k2pMgx00JhP3ZZpbX7YtjRmLjJM="
        }
      ]
    }
    

    The mention of mls-tester has an [at] to avoid triggering my automatic webfinger resolution.

    I've adopted the mediaType and encoding attributes from the draft ActivityPub specification. And I've standardized the Welcome message to incorporate those.

    The Create includes the Welcome and a VaultItem as instruments rather than being sent as separate activities. The Welcome can include any number of recipients, so one within the activity should be sufficient.

    The VaultItem is specific to the #Enigmatick client and isn't intended to be federated. That's how I'm handling ongoing access to the decrypted data; the VaultItem is a symmetrically encrypted representation of the original content that can be safely stored on the server for repeated use by the client. I'll need to eventually update the @context with that extension.

  6. Adjusting #Enigmatick's previously built functions to align with the #ActivityPub #E2EE draft.

    KeyPackage collection on the Actor object

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt | jq '.keyPackages'
    

    Response

    "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys"
    

    Retrieve the KeyPackage Collection

    These are populated by the client (the browser using the wasm module loaded in the Svelte SPA). I had a different mechanism in place for managing this (using the instrument field on Activities) but am updating it to use the Add flow for the Collection as specified by the draft.

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
      "type": "Collection",
      "id": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys",
      "totalItems": 39,
      "next": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true"
    }
    

    Follow the next link to retrieve a KeyPackage

    This will mark the KeyPackage as distributed and would typically link it to the Actor that signed the request (that's temporarily disabled for testing).

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Collection",
      "totalItems": 1,
      "items": [
        {
          "type": "KeyPackage",
          "id": "https://enigmatick.social/key-package/cfde7b54-8d08-41e9-8eb5-d997a12e9347",
          "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
          "to": [
            "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
          ],
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "AAEAASCOWe7uxA8tPeI01nDP8ka2irEhgfkK2qM81/o+tEKPEiCz2h2Vv6VVuGSx/C0WINQCuazZm4rQAymxd1JdHGVvaSDurWzIE3z5eXUFz5coFGv9db7DxZDx0arb/gyRuidCAgABImh0dHBzOi8vZW5pZ21hdGljay5zb2NpYWwvdXNlci9qZHQCAAEIAAEAAgADAE0KAAEAAgADAAQABQwAAQACAAMABAAFAAcCAAEBAAAAAGeDNwsAAAAAZ/IDGwBAQJUffd/8/Efgt0ITBeMWfJYcb7S8E5U7yyUINiIUfqmsGwcvTyam6C+9F+k64NBEs0rXjGMjPA6AgiZ2oR4/1wwAQECliseeQfQb0zgq755ZiiujRqLkEWt8WOTJSsBXHK6hey6bNs4wet782NL8k92h1BNuPZDzxHaHXdXe1wgBO6QJ"
        }
      ]
    }
    
  7. Adjusting #Enigmatick's previously built functions to align with the #ActivityPub #E2EE draft.

    KeyPackage collection on the Actor object

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt | jq '.keyPackages'
    

    Response

    "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys"
    

    Retrieve the KeyPackage Collection

    These are populated by the client (the browser using the wasm module loaded in the Svelte SPA). I had a different mechanism in place for managing this (using the instrument field on Activities) but am updating it to use the Add flow for the Collection as specified by the draft.

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
      "type": "Collection",
      "id": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys",
      "totalItems": 39,
      "next": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true"
    }
    

    Follow the next link to retrieve a KeyPackage

    This will mark the KeyPackage as distributed and would typically link it to the Actor that signed the request (that's temporarily disabled for testing).

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Collection",
      "totalItems": 1,
      "items": [
        {
          "type": "KeyPackage",
          "id": "https://enigmatick.social/key-package/cfde7b54-8d08-41e9-8eb5-d997a12e9347",
          "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
          "to": [
            "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
          ],
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "AAEAASCOWe7uxA8tPeI01nDP8ka2irEhgfkK2qM81/o+tEKPEiCz2h2Vv6VVuGSx/C0WINQCuazZm4rQAymxd1JdHGVvaSDurWzIE3z5eXUFz5coFGv9db7DxZDx0arb/gyRuidCAgABImh0dHBzOi8vZW5pZ21hdGljay5zb2NpYWwvdXNlci9qZHQCAAEIAAEAAgADAE0KAAEAAgADAAQABQwAAQACAAMABAAFAAcCAAEBAAAAAGeDNwsAAAAAZ/IDGwBAQJUffd/8/Efgt0ITBeMWfJYcb7S8E5U7yyUINiIUfqmsGwcvTyam6C+9F+k64NBEs0rXjGMjPA6AgiZ2oR4/1wwAQECliseeQfQb0zgq755ZiiujRqLkEWt8WOTJSsBXHK6hey6bNs4wet782NL8k92h1BNuPZDzxHaHXdXe1wgBO6QJ"
        }
      ]
    }
    
  8. Adjusting #Enigmatick's previously built functions to align with the #ActivityPub #E2EE draft.

    KeyPackage collection on the Actor object

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt | jq '.keyPackages'
    

    Response

    "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys"
    

    Retrieve the KeyPackage Collection

    These are populated by the client (the browser using the wasm module loaded in the Svelte SPA). I had a different mechanism in place for managing this (using the instrument field on Activities) but am updating it to use the Add flow for the Collection as specified by the draft.

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
      "type": "Collection",
      "id": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys",
      "totalItems": 39,
      "next": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true"
    }
    

    Follow the next link to retrieve a KeyPackage

    This will mark the KeyPackage as distributed and would typically link it to the Actor that signed the request (that's temporarily disabled for testing).

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Collection",
      "totalItems": 1,
      "items": [
        {
          "type": "KeyPackage",
          "id": "https://enigmatick.social/key-package/cfde7b54-8d08-41e9-8eb5-d997a12e9347",
          "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
          "to": [
            "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
          ],
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "AAEAASCOWe7uxA8tPeI01nDP8ka2irEhgfkK2qM81/o+tEKPEiCz2h2Vv6VVuGSx/C0WINQCuazZm4rQAymxd1JdHGVvaSDurWzIE3z5eXUFz5coFGv9db7DxZDx0arb/gyRuidCAgABImh0dHBzOi8vZW5pZ21hdGljay5zb2NpYWwvdXNlci9qZHQCAAEIAAEAAgADAE0KAAEAAgADAAQABQwAAQACAAMABAAFAAcCAAEBAAAAAGeDNwsAAAAAZ/IDGwBAQJUffd/8/Efgt0ITBeMWfJYcb7S8E5U7yyUINiIUfqmsGwcvTyam6C+9F+k64NBEs0rXjGMjPA6AgiZ2oR4/1wwAQECliseeQfQb0zgq755ZiiujRqLkEWt8WOTJSsBXHK6hey6bNs4wet782NL8k92h1BNuPZDzxHaHXdXe1wgBO6QJ"
        }
      ]
    }
    
  9. Adjusting #Enigmatick's previously built functions to align with the #ActivityPub #E2EE draft.

    KeyPackage collection on the Actor object

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt | jq '.keyPackages'
    

    Response

    "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys"
    

    Retrieve the KeyPackage Collection

    These are populated by the client (the browser using the wasm module loaded in the Svelte SPA). I had a different mechanism in place for managing this (using the instrument field on Activities) but am updating it to use the Add flow for the Collection as specified by the draft.

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
      "type": "Collection",
      "id": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys",
      "totalItems": 39,
      "next": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true"
    }
    

    Follow the next link to retrieve a KeyPackage

    This will mark the KeyPackage as distributed and would typically link it to the Actor that signed the request (that's temporarily disabled for testing).

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Collection",
      "totalItems": 1,
      "items": [
        {
          "type": "KeyPackage",
          "id": "https://enigmatick.social/key-package/cfde7b54-8d08-41e9-8eb5-d997a12e9347",
          "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
          "to": [
            "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
          ],
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "AAEAASCOWe7uxA8tPeI01nDP8ka2irEhgfkK2qM81/o+tEKPEiCz2h2Vv6VVuGSx/C0WINQCuazZm4rQAymxd1JdHGVvaSDurWzIE3z5eXUFz5coFGv9db7DxZDx0arb/gyRuidCAgABImh0dHBzOi8vZW5pZ21hdGljay5zb2NpYWwvdXNlci9qZHQCAAEIAAEAAgADAE0KAAEAAgADAAQABQwAAQACAAMABAAFAAcCAAEBAAAAAGeDNwsAAAAAZ/IDGwBAQJUffd/8/Efgt0ITBeMWfJYcb7S8E5U7yyUINiIUfqmsGwcvTyam6C+9F+k64NBEs0rXjGMjPA6AgiZ2oR4/1wwAQECliseeQfQb0zgq755ZiiujRqLkEWt8WOTJSsBXHK6hey6bNs4wet782NL8k92h1BNuPZDzxHaHXdXe1wgBO6QJ"
        }
      ]
    }
    
  10. Adjusting #Enigmatick's previously built functions to align with the #ActivityPub #E2EE draft.

    KeyPackage collection on the Actor object

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt | jq '.keyPackages'
    

    Response

    "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys"
    

    Retrieve the KeyPackage Collection

    These are populated by the client (the browser using the wasm module loaded in the Svelte SPA). I had a different mechanism in place for managing this (using the instrument field on Activities) but am updating it to use the Add flow for the Collection as specified by the draft.

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
      "type": "Collection",
      "id": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys",
      "totalItems": 39,
      "next": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true"
    }
    

    Follow the next link to retrieve a KeyPackage

    This will mark the KeyPackage as distributed and would typically link it to the Actor that signed the request (that's temporarily disabled for testing).

    Request

    > curl -H "Accept: application/activity+json" https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt/keys?mkp=true | jq
    

    Response

    {
      "@context": [
        "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
        "https://purl.archive.org/socialweb/mls"
      ],
      "type": "Collection",
      "totalItems": 1,
      "items": [
        {
          "type": "KeyPackage",
          "id": "https://enigmatick.social/key-package/cfde7b54-8d08-41e9-8eb5-d997a12e9347",
          "attributedTo": "https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt",
          "to": [
            "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"
          ],
          "mediaType": "message/mls",
          "encoding": "base64",
          "content": "AAEAASCOWe7uxA8tPeI01nDP8ka2irEhgfkK2qM81/o+tEKPEiCz2h2Vv6VVuGSx/C0WINQCuazZm4rQAymxd1JdHGVvaSDurWzIE3z5eXUFz5coFGv9db7DxZDx0arb/gyRuidCAgABImh0dHBzOi8vZW5pZ21hdGljay5zb2NpYWwvdXNlci9qZHQCAAEIAAEAAgADAE0KAAEAAgADAAQABQwAAQACAAMABAAFAAcCAAEBAAAAAGeDNwsAAAAAZ/IDGwBAQJUffd/8/Efgt0ITBeMWfJYcb7S8E5U7yyUINiIUfqmsGwcvTyam6C+9F+k64NBEs0rXjGMjPA6AgiZ2oR4/1wwAQECliseeQfQb0zgq755ZiiujRqLkEWt8WOTJSsBXHK6hey6bNs4wet782NL8k92h1BNuPZDzxHaHXdXe1wgBO6QJ"
        }
      ]
    }
    
  11. FEP-8fcf implemented last night in #Enigmatick.

    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: pool acquire took 436.968µs
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] Request[target: post /inbox, host: enigmatick.social, signature: keyId="https://[redacted]main-key",algorithm="rsa-sha256",headers="(request-target) host date digest content-type collection-synchronization",signature="G...s=, content-type: application/activity+json, content-length: 427, user-agent: http.rb/5.1.1 (Mastodon/4.2.10; +[redacted])]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: verify_axum took 5.040791ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: update_instance took 26.262904ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: total time 32.021645ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking actor [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox] Processing Collection-Synchronization header: collectionId=[redacted]/followers, digest=195650b06cb44278929fd1c2320831f17a2899312dc482de7fc41301778d210a
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox::announce] Announce[by: [redacted], obj: ref:[redacted], at: 2025-12-18T16:24:55Z, id: [redacted]/activity]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::follower_sync] Follower sync digest matches for remote actor [redacted], no reconciliation needed
    

    This also fixes some signature verification issues I hadn't noticed were occurring due to the collection-synchronization header not being included in my verification code. I see now how to make that more flexible to accommodate any headers and will be improving that further.

  12. FEP-8fcf implemented last night in #Enigmatick.

    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: pool acquire took 436.968µs
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] Request[target: post /inbox, host: enigmatick.social, signature: keyId="https://[redacted]main-key",algorithm="rsa-sha256",headers="(request-target) host date digest content-type collection-synchronization",signature="G...s=, content-type: application/activity+json, content-length: 427, user-agent: http.rb/5.1.1 (Mastodon/4.2.10; +[redacted])]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: verify_axum took 5.040791ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: update_instance took 26.262904ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: total time 32.021645ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking actor [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox] Processing Collection-Synchronization header: collectionId=[redacted]/followers, digest=195650b06cb44278929fd1c2320831f17a2899312dc482de7fc41301778d210a
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox::announce] Announce[by: [redacted], obj: ref:[redacted], at: 2025-12-18T16:24:55Z, id: [redacted]/activity]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::follower_sync] Follower sync digest matches for remote actor [redacted], no reconciliation needed
    

    This also fixes some signature verification issues I hadn't noticed were occurring due to the collection-synchronization header not being included in my verification code. I see now how to make that more flexible to accommodate any headers and will be improving that further.

  13. FEP-8fcf implemented last night in #Enigmatick.

    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: pool acquire took 436.968µs
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] Request[target: post /inbox, host: enigmatick.social, signature: keyId="https://[redacted]main-key",algorithm="rsa-sha256",headers="(request-target) host date digest content-type collection-synchronization",signature="G...s=, content-type: application/activity+json, content-length: 427, user-agent: http.rb/5.1.1 (Mastodon/4.2.10; +[redacted])]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: verify_axum took 5.040791ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: update_instance took 26.262904ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: total time 32.021645ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking actor [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox] Processing Collection-Synchronization header: collectionId=[redacted]/followers, digest=195650b06cb44278929fd1c2320831f17a2899312dc482de7fc41301778d210a
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox::announce] Announce[by: [redacted], obj: ref:[redacted], at: 2025-12-18T16:24:55Z, id: [redacted]/activity]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::follower_sync] Follower sync digest matches for remote actor [redacted], no reconciliation needed
    

    This also fixes some signature verification issues I hadn't noticed were occurring due to the collection-synchronization header not being included in my verification code. I see now how to make that more flexible to accommodate any headers and will be improving that further.

  14. FEP-8fcf implemented last night in #Enigmatick.

    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: pool acquire took 436.968µs
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] Request[target: post /inbox, host: enigmatick.social, signature: keyId="https://[redacted]main-key",algorithm="rsa-sha256",headers="(request-target) host date digest content-type collection-synchronization",signature="G...s=, content-type: application/activity+json, content-length: 427, user-agent: http.rb/5.1.1 (Mastodon/4.2.10; +[redacted])]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: verify_axum took 5.040791ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: update_instance took 26.262904ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: total time 32.021645ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking actor [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox] Processing Collection-Synchronization header: collectionId=[redacted]/followers, digest=195650b06cb44278929fd1c2320831f17a2899312dc482de7fc41301778d210a
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox::announce] Announce[by: [redacted], obj: ref:[redacted], at: 2025-12-18T16:24:55Z, id: [redacted]/activity]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::follower_sync] Follower sync digest matches for remote actor [redacted], no reconciliation needed
    

    This also fixes some signature verification issues I hadn't noticed were occurring due to the collection-synchronization header not being included in my verification code. I see now how to make that more flexible to accommodate any headers and will be improving that further.

  15. FEP-8fcf implemented last night in #Enigmatick.

    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: pool acquire took 436.968µs
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] Request[target: post /inbox, host: enigmatick.social, signature: keyId="https://[redacted]main-key",algorithm="rsa-sha256",headers="(request-target) host date digest content-type collection-synchronization",signature="G...s=, content-type: application/activity+json, content-length: 427, user-agent: http.rb/5.1.1 (Mastodon/4.2.10; +[redacted])]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: verify_axum took 5.040791ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: update_instance took 26.262904ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::extractors] AxumSigned: total time 32.021645ms
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::blocklist] checking actor [redacted] against BlockList
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox] Processing Collection-Synchronization header: collectionId=[redacted]/followers, digest=195650b06cb44278929fd1c2320831f17a2899312dc482de7fc41301778d210a
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::routes::inbox::announce] Announce[by: [redacted], obj: ref:[redacted], at: 2025-12-18T16:24:55Z, id: [redacted]/activity]
    [2025-12-18T16:24:56Z DEBUG enigmatick::server::follower_sync] Follower sync digest matches for remote actor [redacted], no reconciliation needed
    

    This also fixes some signature verification issues I hadn't noticed were occurring due to the collection-synchronization header not being included in my verification code. I see now how to make that more flexible to accommodate any headers and will be improving that further.

  16. @AdamStuartSmith I had that problem with vanilla Mastodon for a bit when I first installed it. Any posts that got any sort of activity from anyone with a significant following would overwhelm my server for several minutes.

    I solved that by setting up a #Varnish cache in front of my server. I don't use Mastodon anymore, but I still use the cache in front of my bespoke software (#Enigmatick). It works really well to take the load off of the core server for those fan-out posts. Varnish handles the load with aplomb.

  17. @AdamStuartSmith I had that problem with vanilla Mastodon for a bit when I first installed it. Any posts that got any sort of activity from anyone with a significant following would overwhelm my server for several minutes.

    I solved that by setting up a #Varnish cache in front of my server. I don't use Mastodon anymore, but I still use the cache in front of my bespoke software (#Enigmatick). It works really well to take the load off of the core server for those fan-out posts. Varnish handles the load with aplomb.

  18. @AdamStuartSmith I had that problem with vanilla Mastodon for a bit when I first installed it. Any posts that got any sort of activity from anyone with a significant following would overwhelm my server for several minutes.

    I solved that by setting up a #Varnish cache in front of my server. I don't use Mastodon anymore, but I still use the cache in front of my bespoke software (#Enigmatick). It works really well to take the load off of the core server for those fan-out posts. Varnish handles the load with aplomb.

  19. @AdamStuartSmith I had that problem with vanilla Mastodon for a bit when I first installed it. Any posts that got any sort of activity from anyone with a significant following would overwhelm my server for several minutes.

    I solved that by setting up a #Varnish cache in front of my server. I don't use Mastodon anymore, but I still use the cache in front of my bespoke software (#Enigmatick). It works really well to take the load off of the core server for those fan-out posts. Varnish handles the load with aplomb.

  20. @AdamStuartSmith I had that problem with vanilla Mastodon for a bit when I first installed it. Any posts that got any sort of activity from anyone with a significant following would overwhelm my server for several minutes.

    I solved that by setting up a #Varnish cache in front of my server. I don't use Mastodon anymore, but I still use the cache in front of my bespoke software (#Enigmatick). It works really well to take the load off of the core server for those fan-out posts. Varnish handles the load with aplomb.

  21. Enigmatick ActivityPub C2S

    From its conception, #Enigmatick has leaned heavily on the `inbox` and `outbox` endpoints for client operations. [...]

    enigmatick.social/objects?uuid

  22. Enigmatick ActivityPub C2S

    From its conception, #Enigmatick has leaned heavily on the `inbox` and `outbox` endpoints for client operations. [...]

    enigmatick.social/objects?uuid

  23. Enigmatick ActivityPub C2S

    From its conception, #Enigmatick has leaned heavily on the `inbox` and `outbox` endpoints for client operations. [...]

    enigmatick.social/objects?uuid

  24. Enigmatick ActivityPub C2S

    From its conception, #Enigmatick has leaned heavily on the `inbox` and `outbox` endpoints for client operations. [...]

    enigmatick.social/objects?uuid

  25. Enigmatick ActivityPub C2S

    From its conception, #Enigmatick has leaned heavily on the `inbox` and `outbox` endpoints for client operations. [...]

    enigmatick.social/objects?uuid

  26. @reiver …and it's not just the sheer amount of storage; prudent expiration and cleanup (e.g., #Enigmatick clears cache data each night that's greater than 30 days old) helps to manage that. It's the application load of pulling up the same records tens of thousands of times within a few seconds when new content is created (i.e., the fan-out of initial delivery and the resulting requests back for content).

    I use Varnish and that helps a lot with the latter case. But a #FediCDN could be built on Varnish (like Fastly is) and provide decentralization in that service.

  27. @reiver …and it's not just the sheer amount of storage; prudent expiration and cleanup (e.g., #Enigmatick clears cache data each night that's greater than 30 days old) helps to manage that. It's the application load of pulling up the same records tens of thousands of times within a few seconds when new content is created (i.e., the fan-out of initial delivery and the resulting requests back for content).

    I use Varnish and that helps a lot with the latter case. But a #FediCDN could be built on Varnish (like Fastly is) and provide decentralization in that service.

  28. @reiver …and it's not just the sheer amount of storage; prudent expiration and cleanup (e.g., #Enigmatick clears cache data each night that's greater than 30 days old) helps to manage that. It's the application load of pulling up the same records tens of thousands of times within a few seconds when new content is created (i.e., the fan-out of initial delivery and the resulting requests back for content).

    I use Varnish and that helps a lot with the latter case. But a #FediCDN could be built on Varnish (like Fastly is) and provide decentralization in that service.

  29. @reiver …and it's not just the sheer amount of storage; prudent expiration and cleanup (e.g., #Enigmatick clears cache data each night that's greater than 30 days old) helps to manage that. It's the application load of pulling up the same records tens of thousands of times within a few seconds when new content is created (i.e., the fan-out of initial delivery and the resulting requests back for content).

    I use Varnish and that helps a lot with the latter case. But a #FediCDN could be built on Varnish (like Fastly is) and provide decentralization in that service.

  30. @reiver …and it's not just the sheer amount of storage; prudent expiration and cleanup (e.g., #Enigmatick clears cache data each night that's greater than 30 days old) helps to manage that. It's the application load of pulling up the same records tens of thousands of times within a few seconds when new content is created (i.e., the fan-out of initial delivery and the resulting requests back for content).

    I use Varnish and that helps a lot with the latter case. But a #FediCDN could be built on Varnish (like Fastly is) and provide decentralization in that service.

  31. I finally got around to setting up #nodeinfo properly on #Enigmatick as an effort to be a more compliant #ActivityPub participant. Coincidentally (and unexpectedly), my connected instances have jumped substantially (>15% in 24 hours):

    enigmatick=> SELECT                                                                                                          CASE                                                                                                                       WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 day' THEN 'last 24h'                                                               WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '2 days' THEN '24-48h ago'                                                            WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days' THEN '48-72h ago'                                                          END as period,                                                                                                           COUNT(*)                                                                                                               FROM instances                                                                                                           WHERE created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days'                                                                             GROUP BY period                                                                                                          ORDER BY period;
       period   | count
    ------------+-------
     24-48h ago |     1
     48-72h ago |     3
     last 24h   |   164
    (3 rows)
    

    Maybe it's not directly related - I also fixed some direct object and tags link references to provide proper ActivityPub representations.

  32. I finally got around to setting up #nodeinfo properly on #Enigmatick as an effort to be a more compliant #ActivityPub participant. Coincidentally (and unexpectedly), my connected instances have jumped substantially (>15% in 24 hours):

    enigmatick=> SELECT                                                                                                          CASE                                                                                                                       WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 day' THEN 'last 24h'                                                               WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '2 days' THEN '24-48h ago'                                                            WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days' THEN '48-72h ago'                                                          END as period,                                                                                                           COUNT(*)                                                                                                               FROM instances                                                                                                           WHERE created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days'                                                                             GROUP BY period                                                                                                          ORDER BY period;
       period   | count
    ------------+-------
     24-48h ago |     1
     48-72h ago |     3
     last 24h   |   164
    (3 rows)
    

    Maybe it's not directly related - I also fixed some direct object and tags link references to provide proper ActivityPub representations.

  33. I finally got around to setting up #nodeinfo properly on #Enigmatick as an effort to be a more compliant #ActivityPub participant. Coincidentally (and unexpectedly), my connected instances have jumped substantially (>15% in 24 hours):

    enigmatick=> SELECT                                                                                                          CASE                                                                                                                       WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 day' THEN 'last 24h'                                                               WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '2 days' THEN '24-48h ago'                                                            WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days' THEN '48-72h ago'                                                          END as period,                                                                                                           COUNT(*)                                                                                                               FROM instances                                                                                                           WHERE created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days'                                                                             GROUP BY period                                                                                                          ORDER BY period;
       period   | count
    ------------+-------
     24-48h ago |     1
     48-72h ago |     3
     last 24h   |   164
    (3 rows)
    

    Maybe it's not directly related - I also fixed some direct object and tags link references to provide proper ActivityPub representations.

  34. I finally got around to setting up #nodeinfo properly on #Enigmatick as an effort to be a more compliant #ActivityPub participant. Coincidentally (and unexpectedly), my connected instances have jumped substantially (>15% in 24 hours):

    enigmatick=> SELECT                                                                                                          CASE                                                                                                                       WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 day' THEN 'last 24h'                                                               WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '2 days' THEN '24-48h ago'                                                            WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days' THEN '48-72h ago'                                                          END as period,                                                                                                           COUNT(*)                                                                                                               FROM instances                                                                                                           WHERE created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days'                                                                             GROUP BY period                                                                                                          ORDER BY period;
       period   | count
    ------------+-------
     24-48h ago |     1
     48-72h ago |     3
     last 24h   |   164
    (3 rows)
    

    Maybe it's not directly related - I also fixed some direct object and tags link references to provide proper ActivityPub representations.

  35. I finally got around to setting up #nodeinfo properly on #Enigmatick as an effort to be a more compliant #ActivityPub participant. Coincidentally (and unexpectedly), my connected instances have jumped substantially (>15% in 24 hours):

    enigmatick=> SELECT                                                                                                          CASE                                                                                                                       WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 day' THEN 'last 24h'                                                               WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '2 days' THEN '24-48h ago'                                                            WHEN created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days' THEN '48-72h ago'                                                          END as period,                                                                                                           COUNT(*)                                                                                                               FROM instances                                                                                                           WHERE created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '3 days'                                                                             GROUP BY period                                                                                                          ORDER BY period;
       period   | count
    ------------+-------
     24-48h ago |     1
     48-72h ago |     3
     last 24h   |   164
    (3 rows)
    

    Maybe it's not directly related - I also fixed some direct object and tags link references to provide proper ActivityPub representations.

  36. I added the ability to manage property values on users' profiles to #Enigmatick. As I'm using this more as my full-time #Fediverse platform, I'm running into things that I've sort of blown off in the past as silly or unnecessary but finding useful now.

    In this case, I implemented it using Add and Remove messages posted by the client (a single-page application in Svelte mediated by a wasm module) to the user's outbox on the server. The Actor is the target and the PropertyValue is the Object.

    It's not canonically how those #ActivityPub messages should be used (e.g., managing a Collection - the attachment field on an Actor is not really a Collection). But I think logically it makes sense. And it's client communication only; those activities are not federated. When a profile is updated via the Add or Remove, a separate Update is sent out to known servers to update the profile.

    Also, I may have gone a little overboard with my own properties.

  37. I added the ability to manage property values on users' profiles to #Enigmatick. As I'm using this more as my full-time #Fediverse platform, I'm running into things that I've sort of blown off in the past as silly or unnecessary but finding useful now.

    In this case, I implemented it using Add and Remove messages posted by the client (a single-page application in Svelte mediated by a wasm module) to the user's outbox on the server. The Actor is the target and the PropertyValue is the Object.

    It's not canonically how those #ActivityPub messages should be used (e.g., managing a Collection - the attachment field on an Actor is not really a Collection). But I think logically it makes sense. And it's client communication only; those activities are not federated. When a profile is updated via the Add or Remove, a separate Update is sent out to known servers to update the profile.

    Also, I may have gone a little overboard with my own properties.

  38. I added the ability to manage property values on users' profiles to #Enigmatick. As I'm using this more as my full-time #Fediverse platform, I'm running into things that I've sort of blown off in the past as silly or unnecessary but finding useful now.

    In this case, I implemented it using Add and Remove messages posted by the client (a single-page application in Svelte mediated by a wasm module) to the user's outbox on the server. The Actor is the target and the PropertyValue is the Object.

    It's not canonically how those #ActivityPub messages should be used (e.g., managing a Collection - the attachment field on an Actor is not really a Collection). But I think logically it makes sense. And it's client communication only; those activities are not federated. When a profile is updated via the Add or Remove, a separate Update is sent out to known servers to update the profile.

    Also, I may have gone a little overboard with my own properties.

  39. I added the ability to manage property values on users' profiles to #Enigmatick. As I'm using this more as my full-time #Fediverse platform, I'm running into things that I've sort of blown off in the past as silly or unnecessary but finding useful now.

    In this case, I implemented it using Add and Remove messages posted by the client (a single-page application in Svelte mediated by a wasm module) to the user's outbox on the server. The Actor is the target and the PropertyValue is the Object.

    It's not canonically how those #ActivityPub messages should be used (e.g., managing a Collection - the attachment field on an Actor is not really a Collection). But I think logically it makes sense. And it's client communication only; those activities are not federated. When a profile is updated via the Add or Remove, a separate Update is sent out to known servers to update the profile.

    Also, I may have gone a little overboard with my own properties.

  40. I added the ability to manage property values on users' profiles to #Enigmatick. As I'm using this more as my full-time #Fediverse platform, I'm running into things that I've sort of blown off in the past as silly or unnecessary but finding useful now.

    In this case, I implemented it using Add and Remove messages posted by the client (a single-page application in Svelte mediated by a wasm module) to the user's outbox on the server. The Actor is the target and the PropertyValue is the Object.

    It's not canonically how those #ActivityPub messages should be used (e.g., managing a Collection - the attachment field on an Actor is not really a Collection). But I think logically it makes sense. And it's client communication only; those activities are not federated. When a profile is updated via the Add or Remove, a separate Update is sent out to known servers to update the profile.

    Also, I may have gone a little overboard with my own properties.

  41. Occasionally a comment to a post is deleted. Or sometimes it hasn't reached my server for whatever reason. In this case, I can tell based on the next comment that it's from Bluesky and I really just don't care enough about that service to figure out why my server may not be pulling it down correctly.

    But it sucks to have broken threads because one bit goes missing. So I added in this "Unavailable Comment" component just now.

    I think that will help.

    #Enigmatick #Threading

  42. Occasionally a comment to a post is deleted. Or sometimes it hasn't reached my server for whatever reason. In this case, I can tell based on the next comment that it's from Bluesky and I really just don't care enough about that service to figure out why my server may not be pulling it down correctly.

    But it sucks to have broken threads because one bit goes missing. So I added in this "Unavailable Comment" component just now.

    I think that will help.

    #Enigmatick #Threading

  43. Occasionally a comment to a post is deleted. Or sometimes it hasn't reached my server for whatever reason. In this case, I can tell based on the next comment that it's from Bluesky and I really just don't care enough about that service to figure out why my server may not be pulling it down correctly.

    But it sucks to have broken threads because one bit goes missing. So I added in this "Unavailable Comment" component just now.

    I think that will help.

    #Enigmatick #Threading

  44. Occasionally a comment to a post is deleted. Or sometimes it hasn't reached my server for whatever reason. In this case, I can tell based on the next comment that it's from Bluesky and I really just don't care enough about that service to figure out why my server may not be pulling it down correctly.

    But it sucks to have broken threads because one bit goes missing. So I added in this "Unavailable Comment" component just now.

    I think that will help.

    #Enigmatick #Threading

  45. Occasionally a comment to a post is deleted. Or sometimes it hasn't reached my server for whatever reason. In this case, I can tell based on the next comment that it's from Bluesky and I really just don't care enough about that service to figure out why my server may not be pulling it down correctly.

    But it sucks to have broken threads because one bit goes missing. So I added in this "Unavailable Comment" component just now.

    I think that will help.

    #Enigmatick #Threading