home.social

#economic-inequality — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #economic-inequality, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. DATE: October 10, 2026 at 10:00AM
    SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG

    ** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
    -------------------------------------------------

    TITLE: Belief in supernatural evil is linked to blaming the system for poverty

    URL: psypost.org/belief-in-supernat

    People who believe in supernatural evil are more likely to blame society for poverty, while those who believe in a supportive deity are less likely to do so. These findings come from a recent survey of South Korean adults published in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. The research reveals how specific theological ideas intersect with political ideology to shape public views on social inequality.

    Sociologists use the term stratification beliefs to describe how people explain why some individuals are wealthy and others are impoverished. In this field of study, explanations for poverty are generally divided into two main categories. Individualistic beliefs place the blame on the poor themselves, citing a lack of effort, talent, or financial discipline. Structuralist beliefs fault the broader economic and social systems, pointing to issues like discrimination, low wages, or underfunded schools.

    How a person explains poverty often predicts their support for welfare programs and redistributive economic policies. Past research has examined how religion influences these views, but most studies have focused simply on whether a person belongs to a specific denomination. Researchers often categorize people as Catholic, Protestant, or Buddhist without examining the specific nature of their personal faith.

    To address this gap, sociologists Jong Hyun Jung and Muhan Chen of Sungkyunkwan University, along with Harris Hyun-soo Kim of Ewha Womans University, designed a study focused on specific supernatural beliefs. They wanted to understand how belief in a supportive divine presence compares to a belief in supernatural evil when it comes to predicting attitudes toward poverty. The team also sought to test these relationships outside of a Western context.

    They chose South Korea for its unique blend of religious traditions, where Buddhism, Protestantism, and Catholicism coexist alongside a large population of people with no religious affiliation. Supernatural belief in South Korea is also moderate compared to heavily Christian nations like the United States. This environment provided a distinct cultural backdrop to see if previous theories about religion and economics hold true in a different setting.

    The researchers analyzed data from an online survey of 1,632 South Korean adults conducted in August 2024. The participant pool was recruited to match the national population in terms of age, gender, and geographic region. Because the survey included questions about a person’s relationship with God, the researchers excluded respondents who stated they completely disbelieved in a deity.

    The survey asked participants to rate their agreement with statements measuring two distinct theological concepts. Belief in divine support was measured by asking if respondents felt they had a warm relationship with God and if God was responsive to their personal needs. Belief in supernatural evil was measured by asking participants if they believed in the existence of demons, hell, and the devil.

    Participants then rated the importance of various causes of poverty. To measure individualistic views, the survey asked about factors like personal irresponsibility and a lack of thrift. To gauge structuralist views, respondents evaluated the role of low wages, prejudice, and a failure of private industry to provide enough good jobs. The researchers also asked participants to rate their own political orientation on a scale from very liberal to very conservative.

    When the researchers analyzed the data, they found that neither religious belief was associated with individualistic explanations for poverty. People who reported a warm relationship with God were no more likely to blame poor individuals for their circumstances than those with weaker divine beliefs. The same held true for those who firmly believed in demons and hell.

    The authors suggest that this lack of association might stem from the charitable aspects of religious involvement. Believing in a supportive deity might increase a person’s sense of compassion for others. This humanitarian impulse could prevent believers from harshly judging those who fall below the poverty line, even if their faith encourages self-reliance in other areas of life.

    A different pattern emerged when the researchers looked at structuralist explanations for poverty. Belief in divine support was negatively associated with blaming systemic and economic issues. In other words, individuals who felt closely supported by God were less likely to view poor schools or low wages as the primary drivers of poverty.

    This result aligns with an academic concept known as the insurance effect. Some sociologists argue that religion provides psychological comfort and a sense of security that functions much like a social safety net. People who rely on a divine figure for support during hard times might feel less need for government intervention, prompting them to discount systemic explanations for economic hardship.

    Conversely, belief in supernatural evil was positively associated with structuralist views. Respondents who expressed a strong belief in the devil, hell, and demons were more likely to blame society and economic systems for poverty. The researchers interpret this through the lens of a spiritual warfare worldview, which sees the universe as a battleground between good and evil.

    In this worldview, adversarial supernatural forces are thought to be actively working to harm humanity. Believers might view oppressive social structures, rampant discrimination, or failing schools as manifestations of these dark forces. As a result, they may attribute the suffering of the poor to these external, corrupt systems rather than pointing the finger at the individuals experiencing the hardship.

    The research team also looked at how political orientation interacted with these supernatural beliefs. In general, conservative respondents were much less likely to endorse structuralist explanations for poverty than liberal respondents. This aligns with a wide body of existing political science research.

    However, a strong belief in supernatural evil modified this trend among political conservatives. For respondents who leaned conservative, higher levels of belief in demons and hell were linked to a sharp increase in structuralist views of poverty. In fact, conservatives with the strongest belief in supernatural evil were nearly identical to liberals in their tendency to blame the system for poverty. Belief in supernatural evil did not have this effect on liberal respondents, who generally favored structuralist explanations regardless of their religious views.

    The researchers note several caveats to consider when interpreting these results. The survey captured a single snapshot in time, meaning the data cannot prove a specific directional relationship between the variables. It is entirely possible that a person’s preexisting views on poverty and inequality shape how they interpret their religious faith, rather than the other way around.

    Cultural differences also provide important context for these results. Research in psychology indicates that people in East Asian societies often lean toward environmental and situational explanations for human behavior, whereas Westerners frequently favor individualistic explanations. This cultural baseline in South Korea might suppress any potential link between religious beliefs and individualistic views on poverty, a dynamic that could look entirely different in the United States or Europe.

    Additionally, the concepts of God and evil carry different meanings across varying religious traditions. A devout Buddhist and a practicing Protestant might interpret survey questions about supernatural forces in entirely different ways. Future research will need to untangle how specific doctrinal teachings within different faiths interact with public opinions on wealth and inequality.

    The study, “Belief in Supernatural Agents and Lay Explanations About the Causes of Poverty,” was authored by Jong Hyun Jung, Muhan Chen, and Harris Hyun-soo Kim.

    URL: psypost.org/belief-in-supernat

    -------------------------------------------------

    Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: clinicians-exchange.org

    Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot

    -------------------------------------------------

    #psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #BeliefInSupernatural #PovertyCauses #StructuralistVsIndividualistic #ReligiousBeliefAndPolicy #SouthKoreaStudy #DivineSupport #SupernaturalEvil #PovertyExplained #WelfareAttitudes #EconomicInequality perceptions

  2. AI ‘widening economic inequality’, warns IMF boss – Arab News

    AI ‘widening economic inequality’, warns IMF boss  Arab NewsIMF chief warns energy shock, public debt and AI boom threaten…
    #Economy #AI #business #economicinequality #Inequality #internationalmonetaryfund(imf) #KristalinaGeorgieva #publicfinances
    europesays.com/3295378/

  3. AI ‘widening economic inequality’, warns IMF boss – Arab News

    AI ‘widening economic inequality’, warns IMF boss  Arab NewsIMF chief warns energy shock, public debt and AI boom threaten…
    #NewsBeep #News #Economy #AI #Business #economicinequality #inequality #InternationalMonetaryFund(IMF) #KristalinaGeorgieva #publicfinances #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/794590/

  4. Palantir CEO Alex Karp Warns AI Could Increase Wealth While Worsening Inequality

    📰 Original title: 💬Money Quote: Palantir’s Alex Karp on AI’s Political Fallout

    🤖 IA: It's not clickbait ✅
    👥 Users: It's not clickbait ✅

    👇👇👇 en.killbait.com/palantir-ceo-a

    #artificialintelligence #economicinequality #palantir

  5. “Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey, / Where wealth accumulates, and men decay”*…

    Sasha Rogelberg marks a painful milestone…

    The U.S. workforce has just made the type of history it likely wishes it didn’t. Working Americans are taking home the smallest percentage of economic output, 52.8%, since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking the metric in 1947.

    But as the share of wealth workers take home through wages—called labor share—is shrinking, corporate profits have exploded, with the S&P 500 index gaining 600% since the beginning of the century, while wages have increased just 12.5% over the same period, adjusted for inflation.

    In other words: Corporations are raking in cash, but American workers are reaping less and less of the rewards. 

    The consequences associated with shrinking labor shares are now becoming tangible. A recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that across the 11 states sampled, Amazon, the country’s largest company by revenue, has 12,346 workers on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and 11,338 relying on Medicaid. That was nearly triple the number of Amazon employees in need of federal assistance compared to 2020, when GAO conducted a similar report. During that same period, Amazon saw an increase in annual profits from $11.6 billion to $77.7 billion. Amazon’s 2025 revenue soared 12% year over year, from $638 billion to a record $717 billion…

    … Walmart and FedEx saw similar increases in the number of workers taking federal assistance, as did ride-share and delivery companies.

    Kathryn Larin, director for education, workforce, and income security issues at GAO, told Fortune the data illustrates that the Americans taking advantage of social safety net programs today are overwhelmingly in the workforce, with most working full-time. The income threshold for SNAP eligibility is about 130% of the poverty line, suggesting that despite many of these workers clocking in at their jobs, they still don’t have enough money to meet their basic needs…

    … Diane Swonk, chief economist and managing director at KPMG, recently warned of the hidden consequences of a shrinking labor share, particularly that despite economic indicators suggesting the economy is stable, most Americans are facing an ongoing affordability crisis. KPMG found in February that since 1982, corporate profits as a share of U.S. GDP increased from 8% to 15.85%. During that same period, employee compensation as a share of U.S. GDP shrank from 66.6% to 61.9%.

    “This chart from my recent Economic Compass still haunts me,” Swonk said in a social media post at the time. [See chart at the top of this post.] “A friend refers to it as the ‘revolution chart,’ which [is] disturbing but telling. Inequality fuels social and economic instability.”

    This trend has been about 50 years in the making, according to Anna Stansbury, an assistant professor of work and organization studies at the MIT Sloan School of Management. 

    Fewer workers in the U.S. are represented by unions—20.1% of U.S. workers in 1983 compared to 10.0% in 2025—giving them fewer opportunities to bargain for salaries and benefits, she noted. But more so, Stansbury blames the fissuring of the workplace, or the breakdown of the employer-employee relationship. In the past, the typical employer-employee relationship would be that of direct employment: A worker for a company does their work at the company they are employed by. For example, a large bank like Bank of America used to employ a janitor to clean its offices.

    But “in more and more cases, that’s not actually people’s experience of the workplace, particularly in lower middle-income jobs,” Stansbury told Fortune.

    Instead, large workplaces like retailers and banks hire gig workers or subcontractors to complete jobs once done by direct employees: Companies hire a security provider, which employs a security guard to work outside that large company’s office. Delivery drivers are contract workers, not full-time employees.

    As a result, companies don’t have to provide those workers equity or benefits. If a subcontractor violates labor law, the company contracting them is not liable. In the meantime, these large companies are not only saving money on benefits, but are also getting to argue that they are increasing efficiency by not spending resources on workers whose roles are not directly driving revenue, Stansbury explained. A bank should employ bankers, not janitors, to get the most bang for its buck, the thinking goes…

    [Rogelberg examines the argument that AI is a material contributor to the lowering of wages (see also here)…]

    … Stansbury has a slightly different theory about AI. While the technology could begin to have an aggregate impact on the labor market, it’s still too early to say whether today’s shrinking labor share is part of a broader economic cycle, or if it’s a secular event, she said.

    Unexpected inflation spikes, like what is currently happening, are usually associated with poorer real wages. If inflation is less volatile in the coming years and wage growth recovers, today’s trend of shrinking labor share could turn out to be cyclical, Stansbury said.

    On the other hand, Stansbury noted, a tightening labor market should increase labor share, and the labor market is already relatively tight. If inflation stabilizes, employment remains narrow, and the labor share increases, it will be a sign of an economic cycle completing itself. A bigger problem will be if wage growth stays low even if inflation improves and the labor market stays tight.

    “If those two things happen and the labor share continues to fall,” she said, “then it would suggest that there’s actually been a secular shift, a secular acceleration in the downward trend.”…

    “Amazon workers on food stamps have tripled despite its record revenue—and it’s just the latest evidence of the new economy of shrinking labor shares,” from @fortune.com.

    See also: “The combination of economic inequality and economic segregation is deadly,” “No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which by far the greater part of the numbers are poor and miserable,” and “It’s the economy, stupid.”

    * Oliver Goldsmith, The Deserted Village (Read it for free on the Internet Archive)

    ###

    As we mind the gap, we might recall that it was on this date in 2011 that hundreds gathered in Zuccotti Park in the Financial District in Manhattan, to kick off the movement that became Occupy Wall Street by occupying the park. Fueled by wide distrust in the private sector after the Great Recession, the movement protested economic inequality, corporate greed, big finance, and the influence of money in politics. The OWS slogan was “We are the 99%.”

    While the encampment, and the thousands who visited, were that anchor of the movement, Occupy Wall Street activists disseminated their message through social media, print magazines and newspapers (extant and OWS pop-ups like The Occupied Wall Street Journal), film, radio, and live streaming.

    The protesters were forced out of Zuccotti Park on November 15, 2011– then turned their focus to occupying banks, corporate headquarters, board meetings, foreclosed homes, college and university campuses, and to social media.

    Rage Against the Machine guitarist Tom Morello with Occupy Wall Street protesters outside of the Equitable Building in Lower Manhattan on Day 28 of OWS, October 14, 2011 (source) #culture #economicInequality #economics #finance #history #inequality #OccupyWallStreet #politics #profits #wages
  6. Foam the Runway

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
    Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — September 14, 2026 — 17:35

    The financial crisis of 2007–2008 forced a choice.

    Stabilize the system, or protect the people inside it.

    In practice, the response prioritized stabilization. The financial system was secured quickly and decisively. The recovery for ordinary households was slower, more uneven, and in many cases incomplete.

    That distinction defines the legacy of the crisis response.

    The Promise of Change

    The 2008 election cycle was built around the idea of transformation.

    Voters were not looking for continuity. They were looking for a break from the policies and assumptions that led to the collapse. The expectation, fairly or not, was that the response would resemble structural reform rather than system preservation.

    There is nothing inherently wrong with a moderate or pragmatic approach to governance. Stability has value. Continuity has value.

    The issue in 2009 was not moderation itself.

    It was the gap between what was promised and what was delivered.

    Stabilizing the System

    When the crisis hit, the financial system was at risk of cascading failure.

    The response from the administration of Barack Obama focused on preventing that outcome. Major financial institutions were stabilized. Liquidity was restored. Confidence, at least within the markets, began to return.

    This approach reflected a clear policy priority: prevent systemic collapse first.

    During this period, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel described the strategy as “foaming the runway,” an aviation term referring to preparing for a controlled emergency landing.

    The system would land safely.

    That was the objective.

    “Foaming the Runway”

    The metaphor matters because it reveals the mindset.

    In an aviation emergency, the priority is not to assign blame midair. It is to ensure the aircraft lands without catastrophic loss. In financial terms, that meant stabilizing the institutions at the center of the crisis.

    In practice, this approach ensured that banks were supported quickly and decisively.

    Whether households would land safely was treated as a separate problem.

    Homeowners and the Limits of Relief

    Relief programs for homeowners existed. On paper, they were intended to slow foreclosures and allow borrowers to remain in their homes.

    In practice, their design limited their effectiveness.

    Participation required extensive documentation, repeated verification, and cooperation from lenders and mortgage servicers. Borrowers were often told that paperwork they had already submitted was missing, incomplete, or needed to be sent again. Trial modifications frequently failed to convert into permanent solutions, and the process became notorious for delays, contradictory instructions, and lost documents at the servicing level (ProPublica, 2010).

    Many households did not simply choose to walk away.

    They encountered a process that was prolonged, uncertain, and difficult to complete, contributing to continued foreclosures even as intervention efforts were underway.

    At the same time, lending practices in the years leading up to the crisis had distributed risk widely throughout the financial system through high-risk mortgage products and securitization structures.

    Borrowers were required to navigate complex requirements to obtain relief.

    Financial institutions were stabilized more directly.

    Two Standards in One Crisis

    The contrast was not subtle.

    Financial institutions were encouraged to stabilize, supported by existing legal and administrative capacity, and provided with relatively direct access to relief mechanisms. They had the expertise, representation, and infrastructure necessary to navigate that process successfully.

    Individual homeowners, by comparison, were required to navigate a fragmented and often opaque system, frequently without meaningful assistance. They were asked to document, re-document, and re-qualify, often while under financial and emotional stress.

    The result was not simply uneven recovery.

    It was the application of two different standards within the same crisis.

    The Accountability Gap

    The scale of the crisis raised expectations of accountability.

    Those expectations were not widely met.

    Despite widespread evidence of risky and, in some cases, abusive lending practices, relatively few senior figures within the financial sector faced individual legal consequences tied directly to the collapse.

    Penalties were often institutional rather than personal.

    For many observers, the conclusion was difficult to avoid: the system had the capacity to absorb losses, but limited capacity to assign responsibility at the highest levels.

    A Matter of Governing Philosophy

    Barack Obama later observed that his policy positions might have been considered those of a “moderate Republican” in an earlier political era.

    There is nothing inherently wrong with that orientation.

    But it helps explain the response.

    A pragmatic, system-preserving philosophy will prioritize stability, continuity, and incremental change. It will avoid disruption where possible, even when disruption is what some voters expected.

    That approach stabilized the system.

    It did not produce equal protection for those affected by its failure.

    What Was Protected

    The financial system recovered.

    Markets stabilized. Institutions regained footing. Confidence returned at the top of the economic structure.

    Households experienced a different trajectory.

    Recovery took longer. Losses in housing, savings, and opportunity were not fully restored for many. Time, once lost, could not be recovered.

    The system was stabilized first.

    For many households, recovery was slower, more burdensome, and far less secure.

    References

    Congressional Oversight Panel. (2009–2011). Oversight reports on the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

    Obama, B. (2012). Interview on political ideology and historical comparison of policy positions.

    ProPublica. (2010). By the numbers: A revealing look at the mortgage modification effort.

    U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2009). Making Home Affordable Program guidelines.

    White House. (2009). Statements and briefings on financial stabilization strategy.

    #bankBailout #economicInequality #financialCrisisPolicy #greatRecession #housingCrisis #ObamaAdministration #WPSNews
  7. What People Still Don’t Understand About Occupy

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News
    Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — September 1, 2026

    People think Occupy Wall Street was about hating rich people.

    It wasn’t.

    Warren Buffett did not cause the Great Recession. Bill Gates did not cause the Great Recession. People like that did not crash the housing market, did not package bad loans, and did not build the financial machinery that broke in 2008. That is not what this was about.

    Some people are wired to do certain things. Buffett can read financial systems in a way most people cannot. Gates built one of the most successful technology companies in history. That is real. There is nothing wrong with saying so.

    But success at that scale does not happen in a vacuum. The modern American economy, especially in technology and finance, created extraordinary wealth for a very small number of people while leaving a lot of other people exposed, underpaid, or disposable.

    Bill Gates is literally two years older than me. Same birthday, October 28th. He was born into a wealthy family. I was born working-class. We both got into computers.

    He became one of the richest men in the world.

    I am living in the Philippines because in retirement I can stay just above the poverty line here in a way I could not in the United States.

    That is not a colorful detail. It is an economic fact.

    I am not saying Bill Gates personally put me here. I am saying the world that made him possible also created a system that did not carry a great many other people forward with anything close to the same protection, stability, or reward.

    That is part of the story too.

    This Was Bigger Than Wall Street

    What people miss is that Occupy was not just about banks.

    It was about what life looked like after the crash.

    In 2010, I spent ten months in Texas trying to find work. I could not get traction for anything. Not even a decent-paying security job.

    I did land a temporary contract through Volt working for Apple in Addison, Texas, doing Level 1 tech support during an iPhone ramp-up. It was not a career move. It was overflow work. I tried to move up to Level 2 support. That did not happen.

    I was older than most of the people they were bringing in. I was also making less than some of the younger hires doing the same work. That was not speculation. That was confirmed in conversation on the floor with other people who were dealing with the same thing.

    After that, I had a short run with an alarm company that did not hold. Then nothing.

    I was not watching this on television. I was living it.

    The Jobless Recovery

    They even had a phrase for what had been happening before the crash, during the Bush years. They called it a “jobless recovery.”

    Think about how insane that phrase really is.

    The economy was supposedly recovering, but people were not getting their jobs back. Markets could improve. Headlines could improve. Corporate balance sheets could improve. But the people inside the economy could still be stuck.

    That idea did not begin in 2008.

    By the time the Great Recession hit, it was already baked into the way too many people in power talked about economic recovery.

    Recovery no longer meant ordinary people were okay.

    It meant the system was okay.

    The Part Nobody Talks About

    Eventually, I went to Chicago in 2011.

    Chicago did what Chicago always does. It took care of me, even if it did not like me.

    I found work. I got back on my feet, at least enough to function.

    But I was living in an extended stay hotel. That is not a lifestyle choice. That is what you do when you do not have anywhere else to go. By definition, that is homelessness. It just does not look like what people think homelessness looks like.

    That is where I lived, on and off, for years.

    Occupy made sense to me because I knew what it felt like to be falling through the cracks while being told the recovery was already here.

    It Was Not Just Homeowners

    Yes, the housing crash mattered.

    Millions of people lost homes. Bad loans were packaged and sold across the financial system. When it collapsed, the damage spread everywhere.

    But it was not just homeowners.

    It was workers. Renters. Temps. People piecing together contract work. People trying to restart careers. People trying to stay one step ahead of collapse.

    People who could not get traction.

    We were getting hit from every direction at the same time.

    What Actually Broke

    When the crash came, the system moved fast to stabilize itself.

    Banks were supported. Markets were stabilized.

    Everyone else was told to work through it.

    Find a job. Fill out the paperwork. Try again. Wait.

    But for a lot of us, there was nothing there to move into. The jobs were not there. The opportunities were not there. The pathways were not there.

    That is the part people forget.

    Occupy was not just about one policy failure. It was about a whole social order that kept telling ordinary people to absorb the damage while the institutions that caused it were protected first.

    The Story People Were Told

    At the same time, there was a story being pushed about what was happening, and it was not coming from the people living through it.

    On outlets like Fox News, the focus often shifted to personal responsibility. Homeowners were described as having made bad choices. People who needed help were framed as looking for handouts. Protesters were dismissed as unserious, spoiled, lazy, or worse.

    That narrative mattered.

    Because if the problem is the people, then the system does not have to change.

    And if you are living through unemployment, unstable housing, bad work, or no work, and you are being told it is your fault at the same time the institutions that failed are being stabilized, that is not just economic pressure.

    That is humiliation layered on top of instability.

    People remember that.

    Occupy Was Recognition

    Occupy Wall Street was not ideology.

    It was recognition.

    It was the moment when enough people realized that the system kept landing the same way, no matter what the crisis was.

    The details changed. The outcome did not.

    The people at the top were cushioned.

    Everybody else was told to endure.

    That is why people went into the streets.

    This Was Never About Envy

    It was never about tearing anyone down.

    It was not about people like Buffett or Gates. It was not about success. It was not about saying nobody should ever become rich.

    It was about watching a system bend in one direction, over and over again, and realizing that if you were not on that side of it, you were on your own.

    That is not envy.

    That is recognition.

    Why People Took to the Streets

    When people hit the streets, it was not because they hated the system.

    It was because the system had stopped working for them.

    Not just for homeowners.

    For everyone trying to get by.

    That was the real force behind Occupy Wall Street.

    Not theory. Not slogans. Not fashion. Not performance.

    Recognition.

    One Last Thing

    I was not getting paid then, and I am not getting paid now.

    Having a Patreon account does not mean I am making a living off this. It means I am trying to keep doing the work.

    That is the reality.

    #economicInequality #greatRecession #housingCrisis #joblessRecovery #OccupyWallStreet #unemployment #WorkingClass
  8. aldogrech.substack.com/p/the-m

    The US didn't stop being a troublemaker in 2026. It stopped pretending it wasn't one. Fifty years of shareholder extraction, dressed as benevolence, now undressed.

    #EconomicInequality #AmericanHegemony

  9. #Money, the interesting thing about it is if you #exist in #poverty, you desperately need it for your day to day survival, then if your on the opposite end as in being a multi million or billionaire in reality money means nothing, because everything you own and do is leveraged off of debt that you one don't actually own and second can never actually satisfy, and the rules of the game are very different for those in poverty, and the rules are slightly different if your in the middle, but if your on top, the rules don't apply to you unless somehow your generation and hoarding of wealth imposes upon another top income holder, basically if your in poverty all the way to the bottom end of double digit millions, your beholden to the entire state if it where, and beyond that the entire state apparently is beholden to you and your ability to leverage debt, it is a rigged system of epic inequality and strongly embraces prejudice against the rest of us whom simply would appreciate the basics in life to be readily available without so much turmoil, and stress to our mental and physical wellbeing, money is an illusion of power and has left far to many of us going hungry, literally;

    You can encourage my continued useless #poetry, creativity and expression of self, #commentary, random thoughts, #philosophy and ideas, and by doing so your helping to feed, house and clothe a #disabled man living in #poverty, $5-10-15 It All Helps, via #cashapp at $woctxphotog or via #paypal at paypal.com/donate?campaign_id=…

    #Austerity #Awareness #BrokenSystem #Capitalism #Change #ChronicPoverty #CorporateGreed #CriticalThinking #DailyStruggle #DebtSlavery #DisabledVoices #DisabilityJustice #EconomicInequality #EconomicJustice #EconomicViolence #Economics #Education #ExistentialThought #Financial #FinancialTrauma #FinanciallyDistressed #FoodInsecurity #Hunger #Homelessness #HumanCost #IllusionOfWealth #Inequality #Justice #LateStageCapitalism #MarginalizedVoices #MentalHealthMatters #MutualAid #Neoliberalism #Oligarchy #PhilosophyOfMoney #Plutocracy #Politics #PovertyAwareness #PowerAndControl #PowerDynamics #RealTalk #Reform #RiggedSystem #SocialCommentary #SocialEconomicWarfare #SocialJustice #Society #Solidarity #SpeakTruth #StatusQuo #SupportDisabled #Survival #SystemicOppression #SystemicPoverty #TaxTheRich #TruthBomb #TruthToPower #WakeUpCall #WealthGap #WealthInequality #WorkingClass #WorkingPoor

  10. A quotation from Adlai Stevenson

    We travel together, passengers on a little spaceship, dependent upon its vulnerable reserve of air and soil; all committed for our safety to its security and peace; preserved from annihilation only by the care, the work, and I will say, the love we give our fragile craft. We cannot maintain it half fortunate, half miserable, half confident, half despairing, half slave — to the ancient enemies of mankind — half free in the liberation of resources undreamed of until this day. No craft, no crew, can travel safely with such vast contradictions. On their resolutions depends the survival of us all.

    Adlai Stevenson II (1900–1965) American politician, diplomat, statesman
    Speech (1965-07-09), “Strengthening the International Development Institutions,” sec. 12, United Nations Economic and Social Council, Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland

    More about this quote: wist.info/stevenson-adlai-ewin…

    #quote #quotes #quotation #qotd #adlaistevenson #world #smallworld #biosphere #earth #economicinequality #economicinjustice #ecosystem #humanity #mankind #progress #resources

  11. 🤑 Oh, a $154B CEO wants to take away your voting rights? Sure, because who needs democracy when you can have a billionaire's vision of the 19th century? 🚀 Meanwhile, the real news is NYC women making a killing renting closets—because clearly, that's a sign of progress! 🙄
    fortune.com/2026/07/27/shopify #billionaireculture #votingrights #NYCwomen #economicinequality #closetrentals #HackerNews #ngated

  12. Paul Krugman asks, did you know America's tax system once curbed extreme wealth? He examines how progressive taxation historically limited oligarchic power, leading to a few billionaires controlling 20% of GDP and campaign cash today. Read the full analysis: paulkrugman.substack.com/p/aga #Oligarchy #ProgressiveTaxation #EconomicInequality

  13. The Impact of Trump's Policies on National Stability and Democracy

    📰 Original title: Years of embarrassment led a raging Trump to this abomination

    🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
    👥 Users: It's clickbait ⚠️

    View full AI summary en.killbait.com/the-impact-of-

    #politics #trumppolicies #democraticerosion #economicinequality

  14. The Impact of Trump's Policies on National Stability and Democracy

    📰 Original title: Years of embarrassment led a raging Trump to this abomination

    🤖 IA: It's clickbait ⚠️
    👥 Users: It's clickbait ⚠️

    View full AI summary en.killbait.com/the-impact-of-

    #politics #trumppolicies #democraticerosion #economicinequality

  15. The New Republic | The Important Missing Word That
    Discredits the Centrists’ New Letter by Michael Tomasky

    AI generated summary, Read the full article for complete information.

    In his piece, Michael Tomasky criticizes a recent letter from moderate Democrat Tom Suozzi and fourteen colleagues that lauds capitalism while conspicuously omitting the single word that undercuts their rhetoric—“monopoly.” He argues that monopoly, not democratic socialists or the government, is the chief threat to genuine competition and that centrist Democrats must confront it if they hope to unite with the increasingly left‑leaning base of the party. Citing rising economic inequality (the U.S. Gini now at 42), the surge of self‑identified democratic socialists, and poll data showing progressives now outnumber moderates, Tomasky urges the party to adopt clear policy commitments—higher taxes on the rich, a solvable Social Security, an $18‑minimum‑wage indexed to inflation, a permanent child‑tax credit, and robust antitrust action—so that Democrats can fight the billionaire “Epstein” class, restore competition, and avoid electoral defeat in 2028.

    Read more: newrepublic.com/article/212449

    #TomSuozzi #DemocraticParty #Monopoly #Antitrust #economicinequality

  16. Fear and Loathing of AI (Part IV): Automation Doesn’t Kill Jobs — It Cheapens People

    By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

    The popular story about automation is that it destroys jobs.

    That story is comforting, because it suggests a clean line: a job exists, a machine replaces it, the job disappears. Tragic, but understandable.

    What actually happens is worse.

    Automation rarely eliminates work outright.
    It cheapens the people who do it.

    The quiet downgrade

    Most jobs don’t vanish overnight. They are degraded.

    Pay drops.
    Expectations rise.
    Staffing thins.
    Monitoring increases.

    Workers are told they should be grateful, because “AI makes you more productive now.”

    Productivity, however, is not shared.
    It is captured.

    The job remains, but dignity erodes.

    From skilled labor to managed output

    Before automation, skill carried bargaining power.
    After automation, skill becomes assumed.

    AI-assisted work quickly shifts from:

    • expertise → throughput
    • judgment → compliance
    • craft → metrics

    Once the machine is involved, human contribution is reframed as a cost center rather than a value source.

    The worker doesn’t disappear.
    The status of the worker does.

    The speed-up without the pay

    Historically, when tools made work faster, workers fought for:

    • shorter hours,
    • higher wages,
    • better conditions.

    AI flips that script.

    Now speed gains are treated as justification for:

    • heavier workloads,
    • constant availability,
    • reduced compensation per unit of work.

    You are not paid more for producing more.
    You are expected to produce more for the same or less.

    This is not innovation failure.
    It is policy choice.

    Surveillance masquerading as assistance

    AI is often introduced as a “helper.”
    In practice, it becomes a manager.

    It tracks:

    • keystrokes,
    • output rates,
    • response times,
    • behavioral patterns.

    What begins as assistance quietly becomes supervision.

    Automation does not just change what you do.
    It changes how closely you are watched while doing it.

    The moral inversion

    When work becomes cheaper, people are treated as more replaceable.

    That inversion is always justified with the same language:

    • efficiency,
    • competitiveness,
    • inevitability.

    But none of those are natural laws.
    They are decisions made by those who benefit.

    Automation does not have ethics.
    Institutions deploying it do.

    The real danger

    The greatest risk of AI-driven automation is not mass unemployment.

    It is a world where:

    • work still consumes most of your life,
    • pay no longer reflects effort,
    • and dignity is treated as a luxury benefit.

    A world where jobs exist, but people inside them are hollowed out.

    A line worth drawing

    AI can reduce drudgery.
    It can assist judgment.
    It can remove unnecessary friction.

    But if productivity gains are not paired with:

    • stronger labor protections,
    • shared gains,
    • and limits on surveillance,

    automation becomes exploitation with better branding.

    Automation doesn’t kill jobs.

    It kills leverage.

    And without leverage, workers don’t disappear.

    They endure.

    For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

    #ArtificialIntelligence #automation #economicInequality #futureOfWork #Labor #Occupy25 #platformCapitalism #productivity #technologyCritique #workerRights #workplaceSurveillance #WPSNews
  17. “It’s the economy, stupid”*…

    Source and background

    Many Americans take pride in having the largest economy in the world… which, per the chart above, by one measure we do.

    But then, if we adjust for population– calculate per capita– the picture changes…

    Source and background

    And we note both that, on a PP basis, the U.S. would be lower and, more fundamentally, that the standing of the U.S. is slipping over time.

    If we dive more deeply still, the picture complicates further…

    Source and background

    This last chart illustrates the wealth inequality in the U.S., which drops from 2nd to 28th when wealth is measured by the median instead of the average… a wealth gap that has been growing since 1985 (and that is combined with an income gap that has been growing since 1980). For more, see World Inequality Database.

    * James Carville

    ###

    As we search for the source of that smell, we might recall that it was on this date in 1549 that Robert Kett agreed to head a group of rebels in the English county of Norfolk during the reign of Tudor king Edward VI. The rebels were incensed by enclosure (the fencing off of common lands by wealthy landlords, as a product of which many peasants lost access to grazing, fuel, and small plots they had long used), along with rising rents, inflation, unemployment, and declining wages; as a response, they began destroying fences. One of their early targets was yeoman Robert Kett who, instead of resisting the rebels, agreed to their demands and offered to lead them.

    Kett and his forces, joined by recruits from the city of Norwich and the surrounding countryside and numbering some 16,000, stormed Norwich and took the city at the end of July. They were besieged by, then routed, a Royal Army detachment led by the Marquess of Northampton who had been sent by the government to suppress the uprising.

    But what became known as “Kett’s Rebellion” ended on August 27, when the rebels were defeated by an army under the leadership of the Earl of Warwick at the Battle of Dussindale. Kett was captured, held in the Tower of London, tried for treason, and hanged from the walls of Norwich Castle on December 7.

    Robert Kett and his followers under the Oak of Reformation on Mousehold Heath. from Kett’s Rebellion in Norfolk (1859) source #culture #economicInequality #economics #enclosure #history #income #inequality #KettSRebellion #politics #RobertKett #USEconomy #wealth
  18. Seasonal Compassion Is a Failed Operating Model

    By Cliff Potts, CSO & Editor-in-Chief, WPS News

    A Predictable Pattern

    Every year, institutions across the developed world engage in a predictable, short-lived surge of concern for poverty, homelessness, and economic precarity. The timing is not accidental. It coincides almost entirely with the Christmas season.

    During this period, corporations, governments, faith institutions, and media organizations briefly acknowledge the existence of the poor. Resources are allocated, messaging shifts toward empathy and generosity, and suffering is framed as tragic but temporary—implicitly solvable through limited charitable action.

    Then the calendar advances. Budgets reset. First-quarter priorities reassert themselves. The systems that produced widespread insecurity resume without modification, now buffered by the reputational credit earned during the holidays.

    This is not an aberration. It is the operating model.

    Compassion as Reputation Management

    Seasonal compassion functions as a reputational offset, not a corrective mechanism. It allows institutions to appear responsive without addressing root causes. In business terms, poverty is treated as a public-relations risk rather than a systemic market failure.

    Concern is carefully bounded in time and scope. It is intense enough to be visible, brief enough to be harmless, and structured to avoid disruption to existing incentives and power arrangements.

    The Market Cost of Impoverishment

    What is rarely acknowledged is that large-scale impoverishment actively shrinks markets.

    When individuals and communities fall into relative or abject poverty, they are removed from meaningful participation in market dynamics. They cannot consume, invest, innovate, or contribute at scale. Their exclusion represents not fiscal discipline, but lost demand, lost productivity, and foregone growth.

    From a purely economic standpoint, allowing populations to become this disadvantaged is not efficiency—it is value destruction.

    Businesses that tolerate or benefit from systems that impoverish large segments of society undermine their own long-term profitability. Markets cannot expand when purchasing power collapses. Innovation stagnates when survival replaces opportunity. Stability erodes when precarity becomes normalized.

    Christianity as Symbol, Not Substance

    Christianity, when invoked during this season, is typically reduced to symbolism rather than substance. The figure of Jesus is used to justify generosity while his actual teachings—on debt, power, exclusion, and material need—are operationally ignored.

    His emphasis was never on sentiment, but on outcomes. He addressed hunger when it existed. He disrupted systems that normalized deprivation. He did not propose seasonal remedies for permanent conditions.

    What we practice instead is managed compassion: bounded, time-limited concern designed to preserve comfort, profit, and institutional continuity while producing minimal structural change.

    Exporting a Broken Model

    This failure is not confined to any one nation. It is exported.

    So-called “developing” economies are encouraged to adopt the same economic frameworks—precarity-based labor, extractive growth models, normalized inequality—that have already demonstrated their inability to produce durable human security. The result is not development, but replication: the same failures, scaled globally.

    From a governance and business perspective, this approach is indefensible.

    The Year-Round Test

    Poverty is not an anomaly within an otherwise healthy system. It is a predictable outcome of policy choices, incentive structures, and economic priorities. Treating it as a seasonal concern guarantees its persistence while steadily eroding the very markets businesses depend on.

    If Christianity—or any ethical framework—is to have relevance beyond decoration, it must inform year-round decision-making: fiscal policy, labor standards, housing strategy, healthcare access, and development models. Not symbolically. Operationally.

    And if we refuse to fix the causes of relative and abject poverty the rest of the year, nothing we do during the Christmas season will ever matter.

    For more social commentary, please see https://Occupy25.com

    APA References

    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235120-en

    World Bank. (2020). Poverty and shared prosperity 2020: Reversals of fortune. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1602-4

    International Monetary Fund. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/15/13.

    Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. W. W. Norton & Company.

    #BusinessEthics #capitalism #Christianity #corporateResponsibility #developmentEconomics #economicInequality #homelessness #marketFailure #Poverty #socialJustice #systemicPoverty #WPSNews
  19. Megyn Kelly Torches Trump’s Iran Disaster as America Pays the Price for Endless Wars

    Megyn Kelly blasts Trump’s Iran strategy as reckless and dangerous while Americans suffer economic pain and endless war costs.

    #Antiwar #China #Diplomacy #EconomicInequality #education #EndlessWars #ForeignPolicy #geopolitics #healthcare #Iran #MAGA #MegynKelly #MiddleEast #militaryIndustrialComplex #PoliticalCommentary #PoliticsDoneRight #ProgressivePolitics #Trump #USPolitics #WarSpending wp.me/p1OjMZ-oVm
Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.