#documentcase — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #documentcase, aggregated by home.social.
-
Former special counsel Jack Smith defends Trump investigation
WASHINGTON — Former special counsel Jack Smith on Thursday defended his findings that President Trump “willfully broke the law” in…
#Politics #Department #documentcase #election #finding #five-hourhearing #jan #jordan #Justice #law #power #presidenttrump #Republicans #result #Smith #Trumpinvestigation
https://www.europesays.com/2723425/ -
Just 2b clear: Not even Judge Cannon argued that the charges of espionage & obstruction of justice against Trump were unfounded.
She used a footnote from corrupt Justice Thomas Clarence — one single opinion, NOT even supported by a Supreme Court majority, just one corrupt Justice, ONE! — to dismiss on a trumped-up technicality that does not have precedent.
I read it as: Preemptive loyalty pledge to dear neo-fascist Nat C's leader Trump.
-
Just 2b clear: Not even Judge Cannon argued that the charges of espionage & obstruction of justice against Trump were unfounded.
She used a footnote from corrupt Justice Thomas Clarence — one single opinion, NOT even supported by a Supreme Court majority, just one corrupt Justice, ONE! — to dismiss on a trumped-up technicality that does not have precedent.
I read it as: Preemptive loyalty pledge to dear neo-fascist Nat C's leader Trump.
-
Just 2b clear: Not even Judge Cannon argued that the charges of espionage & obstruction of justice against Trump were unfounded.
She used a footnote from corrupt Justice Thomas Clarence — one single opinion, NOT even supported by a Supreme Court majority, just one corrupt Justice, ONE! — to dismiss on a trumped-up technicality that does not have precedent.
I read it as: Preemptive loyalty pledge to dear neo-fascist Nat C's leader Trump.
-
Just 2b clear: Not even Judge Cannon argued that the charges of espionage & obstruction of justice against Trump were unfounded.
She used a footnote from corrupt Justice Thomas Clarence — one single opinion, NOT even supported by a Supreme Court majority, just one corrupt Justice, ONE! — to dismiss on a trumped-up technicality that does not have precedent.
I read it as: Preemptive loyalty pledge to dear neo-fascist Nat C's leader Trump.
-
Just 2b clear: Not even Judge Cannon argued that the charges of espionage & obstruction of justice against Trump were unfounded.
She used a footnote from corrupt Justice Thomas Clarence — one single opinion, NOT even supported by a Supreme Court majority, just one corrupt Justice, ONE! — to dismiss on a trumped-up technicality that does not have precedent.
I read it as: Preemptive loyalty pledge to dear neo-fascist Nat C's leader Trump.