home.social

#discussionmanagement — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #discussionmanagement, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @celia

    G+ Communities addressed many of those issues, though they also had many, many warts. Smaller and private communities of 50--100 or so members were actually highly useful.

    G+ Collections were quite good for organising your own content, and allowed others to subscribe or mute specific topics. Others have mentioned liking those, I certainly did.

    3/

    #Lists #hastags #GooglePlus #MastoDev #ContactManagement #DiscussionManagement #Hashtags #MastodonLists #Guppe

  2. @celia
    What's missing is the ability to target a toot at a specific group of people, other than 1) all your followers (which is wide open for unlocked profiles) or 2) a specifically listed set of accounts.

    G+ Circles were OK at directing where content went, but abysmal at filtering incoming content (resulting in many "you're holding it wrong" arguments).

    And management was an utter PITA. I ended up nuking most of mine. There were a few useful features such as being able to permit Notifications, Comments, and Stream for only specified Circles. (I made heavy use of this, with three circles named after those permissions.)

    2/

    #Guppe #MastodonLists #Hashtags #DiscussionManagement #ContactManagement #MastoDev #GooglePlus #hastags #Lists

  3. @celia So, yeah and nah.

    I was on G+ and am familiar with Circles. They had their uses but were mostly a pain.

    On Mastodon, there are #Lists and services such as gup.pe , as well as #hastags, all of which give some ability to organise at least incoming, and some outgoing content.

    1/
    #GooglePlus #MastoDev #ContactManagement #DiscussionManagement #Hashtags #MastodonLists #Guppe