#digitalbranding — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #digitalbranding, aggregated by home.social.
-
DATE: July 5, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Democrats are disproportionately driving the rise in angry congressional tweets, study finds
A recent study published in American Politics Research suggests that members of the United States Congress increasingly rely on angry rhetoric on social media to build their political brands. The research provides evidence that this rise in outrage is not evenly distributed across political parties, with Democratic lawmakers disproportionately driving the trend. These findings help explain how elected officials use high-emotion language to communicate with the public and shape political narratives.
Modern political communication tends to rely heavily on digital platforms. Lawmakers use websites like Twitter, now known as X, to share their policy preferences and craft a public image. This process of creating a specific public persona is often called reputation-building. Through social media, politicians can speak directly to voters without relying on traditional news outlets or press conferences.
The research was conducted by Annelise Russell, an associate professor at the University of Kentucky’s Martin School of Public Policy and author of the book Tweeting Scared: Congress’s Crisis of Communication, alongside University of Kentucky assistant professor Maggie Macdonald and Whitney Hua of the Center for Election Science.
Russell explained that elected officials are highly intentional about their public messages. “We know that members of Congress are strategic communicators and while they may not be explicitly thinking about the emotions they convey in their messaging, they do carefully consider the words used as they have become official statements,” Russell said.
The authors wanted to examine the reality of congressional communication on a platform famous for its hostility. “And because people often describe Twitter as ‘The Bad Place’ we wanted to see if that was really the case when it came to the way they use this platform, because how they speak online has implications for how we understand the institution,” Russell noted.
High-arousal emotions, which are feelings that trigger a strong physical or psychological response, tend to capture user attention quickly. Because angry messages spread rapidly through digital networks, lawmakers have a built-in incentive to use this type of language.
To measure how often politicians use angry language, the researchers analyzed an enormous dataset of social media posts. The sample included over 2.2 million official tweets sent by members of Congress. Because reading millions of posts by hand is impossible, the authors used computational textual analysis. This method relies on computer software to scan large bodies of text and identify specific words, phrases, or emotional tones.
By applying these computer-assisted tools, the researchers categorized the emotional content of the congressional tweets. They looked for language that indicated anger, outrage, or indignation. The scientists then compared the frequency of these angry messages across different political parties. They also mapped the timeline of these posts to see how the use of anger changed over several years of congressional sessions.
The analysis revealed distinct differences in how Democrats and Republicans express emotion on social media. The data provides evidence that Democratic members of Congress are disproportionately driving the increase in angry rhetoric. While both parties utilize outrage to some extent, the overall escalation in angry messaging is largely fueled by the Democratic side of the aisle.
Russell explained that this trend reflects the broader political climate over the past several years. “Over the last decade, there are plenty of things happening in the political world for Democrats to be mad about,” she told PsyPost. “Democrats are not known for their message discipline but they seem to agree that Twitter is the place to take out their frustration with politics.”
This strategy aligns with how digital platforms reward extreme viewpoints with higher visibility. Politicians who take stronger stances often receive more engagement from users. “And those who are more ideologically extreme are turning to platforms like Twitter to lean into outrage politics where the loud and dissatisfied takes reign supreme,” Russell added. “A tweet about what’s working with government isn’t going to land you on Joe Rogan’s podcast.”
Despite this partisan difference, the overall effect size highlights a broader reality about digital communication. Politicians across the spectrum use anger to gain attention, even if one party currently does it more frequently.
“In practicality, Democrats are more likely to lean into the anger but the magnitude isn’t huge because anger and its ability to thrive online is a function of how politicians broadly use a platform like Twitter to grow their personal brand and maintain relevance,” Russell stated.
Interestingly, the researchers noted that the rising trend of angry congressional tweets predates the presidency of Donald Trump. The escalation of partisan outrage in congressional communication was already underway before his time in office.
When asked if any of the study’s findings were unexpected, Russell kept it brief. “Not really, if you study Congress enough, you’re bound to get angry,” she said.
While these findings provide a detailed look at online political rhetoric, there are potential ways to misinterpret the data. It is easy to assume that because lawmakers use angry language on one website, they behave the same way in all professional settings. The study specifically measures public-facing communication strategies on a single platform, not an overarching legislative style.
Russell emphasized that different platforms encourage different types of behavior. “Our findings suggest one way in which members of Congress communicate with digital publics, but it is by no means the only way,” she cautioned. “If you look across the different communications tools they use, you are going to find different trends and I would be careful to assume this is how Congress communicates without acknowledging the affordances of each platform.”
The term affordances refers to the specific features, rules, and cultural norms of a given website. Twitter relies on an algorithm that favors fast-paced, emotionally charged content. Lawmakers might use completely different communication styles on websites like Facebook or Instagram, or during official committee hearings.
Future research will likely expand on this work by examining the individuals behind these accounts and the broader media landscape. Scientists might explore whether lawmakers who post the most angry tweets face different financial incentives during election seasons.
“We’ve always got something cooking up but I think next steps is better understanding the norms behind those individuals producing this content, a better understanding of the media ecosystem around Congress, and how this behavior connects to campaigns and the money required to run those campaigns,” Russell said.
The study, “Rage on the Record: Angry Emotional Appeals in Congress,” was authored by Maggie Macdonald, Whitney Hua, and Annelise Russell.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #AngryPolitics #Congress #Democrats #TwitterRage #PoliticalCommunication #OutragePolitics #DigitalBranding #SocialMediaResearch #AngerInPolitics #PolicyNarratives
-
DATE: July 5, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Democrats are disproportionately driving the rise in angry congressional tweets, study finds
A recent study published in American Politics Research suggests that members of the United States Congress increasingly rely on angry rhetoric on social media to build their political brands. The research provides evidence that this rise in outrage is not evenly distributed across political parties, with Democratic lawmakers disproportionately driving the trend. These findings help explain how elected officials use high-emotion language to communicate with the public and shape political narratives.
Modern political communication tends to rely heavily on digital platforms. Lawmakers use websites like Twitter, now known as X, to share their policy preferences and craft a public image. This process of creating a specific public persona is often called reputation-building. Through social media, politicians can speak directly to voters without relying on traditional news outlets or press conferences.
The research was conducted by Annelise Russell, an associate professor at the University of Kentucky’s Martin School of Public Policy and author of the book Tweeting Scared: Congress’s Crisis of Communication, alongside University of Kentucky assistant professor Maggie Macdonald and Whitney Hua of the Center for Election Science.
Russell explained that elected officials are highly intentional about their public messages. “We know that members of Congress are strategic communicators and while they may not be explicitly thinking about the emotions they convey in their messaging, they do carefully consider the words used as they have become official statements,” Russell said.
The authors wanted to examine the reality of congressional communication on a platform famous for its hostility. “And because people often describe Twitter as ‘The Bad Place’ we wanted to see if that was really the case when it came to the way they use this platform, because how they speak online has implications for how we understand the institution,” Russell noted.
High-arousal emotions, which are feelings that trigger a strong physical or psychological response, tend to capture user attention quickly. Because angry messages spread rapidly through digital networks, lawmakers have a built-in incentive to use this type of language.
To measure how often politicians use angry language, the researchers analyzed an enormous dataset of social media posts. The sample included over 2.2 million official tweets sent by members of Congress. Because reading millions of posts by hand is impossible, the authors used computational textual analysis. This method relies on computer software to scan large bodies of text and identify specific words, phrases, or emotional tones.
By applying these computer-assisted tools, the researchers categorized the emotional content of the congressional tweets. They looked for language that indicated anger, outrage, or indignation. The scientists then compared the frequency of these angry messages across different political parties. They also mapped the timeline of these posts to see how the use of anger changed over several years of congressional sessions.
The analysis revealed distinct differences in how Democrats and Republicans express emotion on social media. The data provides evidence that Democratic members of Congress are disproportionately driving the increase in angry rhetoric. While both parties utilize outrage to some extent, the overall escalation in angry messaging is largely fueled by the Democratic side of the aisle.
Russell explained that this trend reflects the broader political climate over the past several years. “Over the last decade, there are plenty of things happening in the political world for Democrats to be mad about,” she told PsyPost. “Democrats are not known for their message discipline but they seem to agree that Twitter is the place to take out their frustration with politics.”
This strategy aligns with how digital platforms reward extreme viewpoints with higher visibility. Politicians who take stronger stances often receive more engagement from users. “And those who are more ideologically extreme are turning to platforms like Twitter to lean into outrage politics where the loud and dissatisfied takes reign supreme,” Russell added. “A tweet about what’s working with government isn’t going to land you on Joe Rogan’s podcast.”
Despite this partisan difference, the overall effect size highlights a broader reality about digital communication. Politicians across the spectrum use anger to gain attention, even if one party currently does it more frequently.
“In practicality, Democrats are more likely to lean into the anger but the magnitude isn’t huge because anger and its ability to thrive online is a function of how politicians broadly use a platform like Twitter to grow their personal brand and maintain relevance,” Russell stated.
Interestingly, the researchers noted that the rising trend of angry congressional tweets predates the presidency of Donald Trump. The escalation of partisan outrage in congressional communication was already underway before his time in office.
When asked if any of the study’s findings were unexpected, Russell kept it brief. “Not really, if you study Congress enough, you’re bound to get angry,” she said.
While these findings provide a detailed look at online political rhetoric, there are potential ways to misinterpret the data. It is easy to assume that because lawmakers use angry language on one website, they behave the same way in all professional settings. The study specifically measures public-facing communication strategies on a single platform, not an overarching legislative style.
Russell emphasized that different platforms encourage different types of behavior. “Our findings suggest one way in which members of Congress communicate with digital publics, but it is by no means the only way,” she cautioned. “If you look across the different communications tools they use, you are going to find different trends and I would be careful to assume this is how Congress communicates without acknowledging the affordances of each platform.”
The term affordances refers to the specific features, rules, and cultural norms of a given website. Twitter relies on an algorithm that favors fast-paced, emotionally charged content. Lawmakers might use completely different communication styles on websites like Facebook or Instagram, or during official committee hearings.
Future research will likely expand on this work by examining the individuals behind these accounts and the broader media landscape. Scientists might explore whether lawmakers who post the most angry tweets face different financial incentives during election seasons.
“We’ve always got something cooking up but I think next steps is better understanding the norms behind those individuals producing this content, a better understanding of the media ecosystem around Congress, and how this behavior connects to campaigns and the money required to run those campaigns,” Russell said.
The study, “Rage on the Record: Angry Emotional Appeals in Congress,” was authored by Maggie Macdonald, Whitney Hua, and Annelise Russell.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #AngryPolitics #Congress #Democrats #TwitterRage #PoliticalCommunication #OutragePolitics #DigitalBranding #SocialMediaResearch #AngerInPolitics #PolicyNarratives
-
DATE: July 5, 2026 at 08:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: Democrats are disproportionately driving the rise in angry congressional tweets, study finds
A recent study published in American Politics Research suggests that members of the United States Congress increasingly rely on angry rhetoric on social media to build their political brands. The research provides evidence that this rise in outrage is not evenly distributed across political parties, with Democratic lawmakers disproportionately driving the trend. These findings help explain how elected officials use high-emotion language to communicate with the public and shape political narratives.
Modern political communication tends to rely heavily on digital platforms. Lawmakers use websites like Twitter, now known as X, to share their policy preferences and craft a public image. This process of creating a specific public persona is often called reputation-building. Through social media, politicians can speak directly to voters without relying on traditional news outlets or press conferences.
The research was conducted by Annelise Russell, an associate professor at the University of Kentucky’s Martin School of Public Policy and author of the book Tweeting Scared: Congress’s Crisis of Communication, alongside University of Kentucky assistant professor Maggie Macdonald and Whitney Hua of the Center for Election Science.
Russell explained that elected officials are highly intentional about their public messages. “We know that members of Congress are strategic communicators and while they may not be explicitly thinking about the emotions they convey in their messaging, they do carefully consider the words used as they have become official statements,” Russell said.
The authors wanted to examine the reality of congressional communication on a platform famous for its hostility. “And because people often describe Twitter as ‘The Bad Place’ we wanted to see if that was really the case when it came to the way they use this platform, because how they speak online has implications for how we understand the institution,” Russell noted.
High-arousal emotions, which are feelings that trigger a strong physical or psychological response, tend to capture user attention quickly. Because angry messages spread rapidly through digital networks, lawmakers have a built-in incentive to use this type of language.
To measure how often politicians use angry language, the researchers analyzed an enormous dataset of social media posts. The sample included over 2.2 million official tweets sent by members of Congress. Because reading millions of posts by hand is impossible, the authors used computational textual analysis. This method relies on computer software to scan large bodies of text and identify specific words, phrases, or emotional tones.
By applying these computer-assisted tools, the researchers categorized the emotional content of the congressional tweets. They looked for language that indicated anger, outrage, or indignation. The scientists then compared the frequency of these angry messages across different political parties. They also mapped the timeline of these posts to see how the use of anger changed over several years of congressional sessions.
The analysis revealed distinct differences in how Democrats and Republicans express emotion on social media. The data provides evidence that Democratic members of Congress are disproportionately driving the increase in angry rhetoric. While both parties utilize outrage to some extent, the overall escalation in angry messaging is largely fueled by the Democratic side of the aisle.
Russell explained that this trend reflects the broader political climate over the past several years. “Over the last decade, there are plenty of things happening in the political world for Democrats to be mad about,” she told PsyPost. “Democrats are not known for their message discipline but they seem to agree that Twitter is the place to take out their frustration with politics.”
This strategy aligns with how digital platforms reward extreme viewpoints with higher visibility. Politicians who take stronger stances often receive more engagement from users. “And those who are more ideologically extreme are turning to platforms like Twitter to lean into outrage politics where the loud and dissatisfied takes reign supreme,” Russell added. “A tweet about what’s working with government isn’t going to land you on Joe Rogan’s podcast.”
Despite this partisan difference, the overall effect size highlights a broader reality about digital communication. Politicians across the spectrum use anger to gain attention, even if one party currently does it more frequently.
“In practicality, Democrats are more likely to lean into the anger but the magnitude isn’t huge because anger and its ability to thrive online is a function of how politicians broadly use a platform like Twitter to grow their personal brand and maintain relevance,” Russell stated.
Interestingly, the researchers noted that the rising trend of angry congressional tweets predates the presidency of Donald Trump. The escalation of partisan outrage in congressional communication was already underway before his time in office.
When asked if any of the study’s findings were unexpected, Russell kept it brief. “Not really, if you study Congress enough, you’re bound to get angry,” she said.
While these findings provide a detailed look at online political rhetoric, there are potential ways to misinterpret the data. It is easy to assume that because lawmakers use angry language on one website, they behave the same way in all professional settings. The study specifically measures public-facing communication strategies on a single platform, not an overarching legislative style.
Russell emphasized that different platforms encourage different types of behavior. “Our findings suggest one way in which members of Congress communicate with digital publics, but it is by no means the only way,” she cautioned. “If you look across the different communications tools they use, you are going to find different trends and I would be careful to assume this is how Congress communicates without acknowledging the affordances of each platform.”
The term affordances refers to the specific features, rules, and cultural norms of a given website. Twitter relies on an algorithm that favors fast-paced, emotionally charged content. Lawmakers might use completely different communication styles on websites like Facebook or Instagram, or during official committee hearings.
Future research will likely expand on this work by examining the individuals behind these accounts and the broader media landscape. Scientists might explore whether lawmakers who post the most angry tweets face different financial incentives during election seasons.
“We’ve always got something cooking up but I think next steps is better understanding the norms behind those individuals producing this content, a better understanding of the media ecosystem around Congress, and how this behavior connects to campaigns and the money required to run those campaigns,” Russell said.
The study, “Rage on the Record: Angry Emotional Appeals in Congress,” was authored by Maggie Macdonald, Whitney Hua, and Annelise Russell.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #AngryPolitics #Congress #Democrats #TwitterRage #PoliticalCommunication #OutragePolitics #DigitalBranding #SocialMediaResearch #AngerInPolitics #PolicyNarratives
-
Your content isn’t failing…
it’s just invisible. 👀📉No hooks.
No scroll-stopper.
No reason to stay.Fix the content → Fix the attention → Fix the sales. 🚀
Let’s make your brand impossible to ignore.
📞 +91 8668762670
🌐 quickuppsoftech.com#ScrollStoppingContent #IGGrowth2026 #QuickuppSoftech #ContentMarketing #DigitalBranding
-
People don’t believe what a brand says.
They believe what customers experience.That’s your real brand. 💼
If this hits… double-tap 💙
Tag a business owner who should read this.Want a brand people actually trust? Let’s build it. 🚀
📞 +91 8668762670
🌐 quickuppsoftech.com#brandstrategy #businessgrowth #quickuppsoftech #digitalbranding #weekendwisdom
-
Personal branding in 2026 isn’t about volume. It’s about clarity, consistency, and quiet authority.
If your work speaks, you don’t need to shout.
Read the full article on TheDigitalCove.
#PersonalBranding #BrandAuthority #QuietPower #ThoughtLeadership #DigitalBranding #OnlineBusiness #CreatorEcono -
Personal branding in 2026 isn’t about volume. It’s about clarity, consistency, and quiet authority.
If your work speaks, you don’t need to shout.
Read the full article on TheDigitalCove.
#PersonalBranding #BrandAuthority #QuietPower #ThoughtLeadership #DigitalBranding #OnlineBusiness #CreatorEcono -
You don’t need a big budget to look like a big brand. 💼✨
We helped a 3-person startup build a 50-person–level digital presence without overspending.
Small teams can compete big. 🚀
#StartupIndia #IndianStartups #QuickuppSoftech #PuneBusiness #DigitalBranding #ScaleSmart -
Social Media ist keine Option – es ist Pflicht.
Stärke deine Marke, erreiche neue Kunden & bleib im Gespräch.
Jetzt Präsenz zeigen & durchstarten!👉 https://lochnermedia.com/social-media/
#SocialMedia #SocialMediaMarketing #OnlinePräsenz #DigitaleStrategie #BrandAwareness #ContentMarketing
#InstagramMarketing #LinkedInStrategie #SocialMediaStrategie #CommunityAufbau #DigitalBranding #LochnerMedia -
Social Media ist keine Option – es ist Pflicht.
Stärke deine Marke, erreiche neue Kunden & bleib im Gespräch.
Jetzt Präsenz zeigen & durchstarten!👉 https://lochnermedia.com/social-media/
#SocialMedia #SocialMediaMarketing #OnlinePräsenz #DigitaleStrategie #BrandAwareness #ContentMarketing
#InstagramMarketing #LinkedInStrategie #SocialMediaStrategie #CommunityAufbau #DigitalBranding #LochnerMedia -
Social Media ist keine Option – es ist Pflicht.
Stärke deine Marke, erreiche neue Kunden & bleib im Gespräch.
Jetzt Präsenz zeigen & durchstarten!👉 https://lochnermedia.com/social-media/
#SocialMedia #SocialMediaMarketing #OnlinePräsenz #DigitaleStrategie #BrandAwareness #ContentMarketing
#InstagramMarketing #LinkedInStrategie #SocialMediaStrategie #CommunityAufbau #DigitalBranding #LochnerMedia -
Social Media ist keine Option – es ist Pflicht.
Stärke deine Marke, erreiche neue Kunden & bleib im Gespräch.
Jetzt Präsenz zeigen & durchstarten!👉 https://lochnermedia.com/social-media/
#SocialMedia #SocialMediaMarketing #OnlinePräsenz #DigitaleStrategie #BrandAwareness #ContentMarketing
#InstagramMarketing #LinkedInStrategie #SocialMediaStrategie #CommunityAufbau #DigitalBranding #LochnerMedia -
Branding is more than visuals—it’s the heartbeat of your business.
At Neuronus, we help brands build strong identities that foster trust🤝, boost visibility📈, and drive long-term success. Our strategic branding solutions help you stand out in a competitive market.
Let your brand speak with purpose.https://v2.neuronus.net/contact/
Want to know more about branding? Read here.👉
https://neuronus.net/en/blog/why-branding-is-crucial-for-business-growth-and-recognition
#Branding #DigitalBranding #MarketingStrategy #SeamossPL #McDonaldsBranding #BrandRecognition #Neuronus
-
🟩 Latest Features in the SharePoint Brand Center - 🚀 Exciting Updates in SharePoint Brand Center! 🚀
1️⃣ Centralized Branding Hub: Manage your organization's branding seamlessly across SharePoint and Viva Connections.
2️⃣ Custom Font Management: Upload and manage fonts for consistent branding across components.
3️⃣ Theme Creation & Management: Simplify site aesthetics with easy theme creation, no PowerShell needed!The SharePoint Brand Center is revolutionizing how organizations manage their digital branding. With features like custom font management and theme creation, it ensures a consistent and professional appearance across your digital workspace.
#Microsoft365 #SharePoint #BrandCenter #DigitalBranding #Community
-
🟩 Latest Features in the SharePoint Brand Center - 🚀 Exciting Updates in SharePoint Brand Center! 🚀
1️⃣ Centralized Branding Hub: Manage your organization's branding seamlessly across SharePoint and Viva Connections.
2️⃣ Custom Font Management: Upload and manage fonts for consistent branding across components.
3️⃣ Theme Creation & Management: Simplify site aesthetics with easy theme creation, no PowerShell needed!The SharePoint Brand Center is revolutionizing how organizations manage their digital branding. With features like custom font management and theme creation, it ensures a consistent and professional appearance across your digital workspace.
#Microsoft365 #SharePoint #BrandCenter #DigitalBranding #Community
-
RT @Juntae DeLane #DigitalBranding: SPEAKERS: Are you stumped on HOW to repurpose your presentation content? Here are a few quick tips on how!
#digitalbranding #brandmanagement #brandreputation #socialmediabranding #brandingtips #brandingstrategy https://t.co/5kYfadX23k
-
🚀 Discover the Art of Digital Branding! 🎨🌐 In today's fast-paced digital age, effective branding is a must for business success. 🏆 Unleash the power of signature makers to craft a unique visual identity that resonates with your audience. Learn how to balance creativity with brand guidelines and build lasting connections with your customers. Read our latest blog to stay ahead in the competitive digital landscape! 👉 https://www.cryovex.com/digital-branding-power/ #DigitalBranding #BrandingJourney #SignatureMaker