home.social

#darkenergy — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #darkenergy, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Fortunately we have Doctor Who to save us. 👾

    Astrum: *Scientists Say the Universe Could End in 30 Years*

    "Scientists are predicting the end of the universe, and it could happen much sooner than we thought. For the first time, scientists have measured how dark energy is behaving right now, in the local universe, by measuring subtle shifts within our own solar system. How long do we actually have left? The answer might surprise you…"

    youtube.com/watch?v=fPIiJ3iZoJ4

    #Science #universe #astronaut #DarkEnergy

  2. Largest-Ever Physics Survey Raises New Doubts About Our Model of the Universe

    A global survey of physicists reveals strikingly little consensus on some of the deepest questions in modern physics,…
    #NewsBeep #News #Physics #astronomy #Astrophysics #BigBang #DarkEnergy #darkmatter #Science #UK #UnitedKingdom #Universe #UniversityofWaterloo
    newsbeep.com/uk/764430/

  3. Largest-Ever Physics Survey Raises New Doubts About Our Model of the Universe

    A global survey of physicists reveals strikingly little consensus on some of the deepest questions in modern physics,…
    #NewsBeep #News #Physics #Astronomy #Astrophysics #AU #Australia #BigBang #Darkenergy #darkmatter #Science #Universe #UniversityofWaterloo
    newsbeep.com/au/884958/

  4. Largest-Ever Physics Survey Raises New Doubts About Our Model of the Universe

    A global survey of physicists reveals strikingly little consensus on some of the deepest questions in modern physics,…
    #NewsBeep #News #Physics #Astronomy #Astrophysics #AU #Australia #BigBang #Darkenergy #darkmatter #Science #Universe #UniversityofWaterloo
    newsbeep.com/au/884958/

  5. The Beginnings of Man -Part 1

    The nature of Man has evolved over millions of years, changed by environmental conditions, by the response of his instinctual nature and by the actions of his ego. Man’s inner characteristics are altogether different from the ancestral root which governs other species. Why then is he so different?

    tonyaholisticblog.com/2026/08/

  6. The universe may end trillions of years sooner than we thought

    When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Astronomers…
    #NewsBeep #News #Space #bigcrunch #cosmologicalconstant #DarkEnergy #expansionrate #fateoftheuniverse #Science #TheUniverse #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/555298/

  7. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  8. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  9. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  10. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  11. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  12. You’re Living Alongside Invisible Wormholes, Scientists Say—and They May Be Warping Your Reality

    Churning nano-wormholes could explain the clash in our cosmological constants. The wormholes add magnitude to a math parameter…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Science #AmericanPhysicalSociety #cosmologicalconstant #DarkEnergy #ordersofmagnitude #scientists
    newsbeep.com/us/298368/

  13. You’re Living Alongside Invisible Wormholes, Scientists Say—and They May Be Warping Your Reality

    Churning nano-wormholes could explain the clash in our cosmological constants. The wormholes add magnitude to a math parameter…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Science #AmericanPhysicalSociety #cosmologicalconstant #DarkEnergy #ordersofmagnitude #scientists
    newsbeep.com/us/298368/

  14. Cosmology Results from DESI

    Yesterday evening (10pm Irish Time) saw the release of new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), completing a trio of major announcements of cosmological results in the space of two days (the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Euclid Q1 release being the others). I didn’t see the DESI press conference but you can read the press release here.

    There were no fewer than eight DESI papers on the astro-ph section of the arXiv this morning. Here are the titles with links:

    You can see from the titles that the first seven of these relate to the second data release (DR2; three years of data) from DESI; the last one listed here is a description of the first data release (DR1), which is now publicly available.

    Obviously there is a lot of information to digest in these papers so here are two members of the DESI collaboration talking with Shaun Hotchkiss on Cosmology Talks about the key messages from the analysis of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (the BAO in the titles of the new papers):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRaDtslycE

    A lot has been made in the press coverage of these results about the evidence that the standard cosmological model is incomplete; see, e.g., here. Here are a few comments.

    As I see it, taken on their own, the DESI BAO results are broadly consistent with the ΛCDM model as specified by the parameters determined by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) inferred from Planck. Issues do emerge, however, when these results are combined with other data sets. The most intriguing of these arises with the dark energy contribution. The simplest interpretation of dark energy is that it is a cosmological constant (usually called Λ) which – as explained here – corresponds to a perfect fluid with an equation-of-state p=wρc2 with w=-1. In this case the effective mass density of the dark energy ρ remains constant as the universe expands. To parametrise departures from this constant behaviour, cosmologists have replaced this form with the form w(a)=w0+wa(1-a) where a(t) is the cosmic scale factor. A cosmological constant Λ would correspond to a point (w0=-1, wa=0) in the plane defined by these parameters, but the only requirement for dark energy to result in cosmic acceleration is that w<0 not that w=-1.

    The DESI team allow (w0, wa) to act as free parameters and let the DESI data constrain them, either alone or in combinations with other data sets, finding evidence for departures from the “standard values”. Here’s an example plot:

    The DESI data don’t include the standard point (at the intersection of the two dashed lines) but the discrepancy gets worse when other data (such as supernovae and CMB) are folded in, as in this picture. The weight of evidence suggests a dark energy contribution which is decreasing with time.

    These results are certainly intriguing, and a lot of credit is due to the DESI collaboration for working so hard to identify and remove possible systematics in the analysis (see the papers above) but what do they tell us about ΛCDM?

    My view is that we’ve never known what the dark energy actually is or why it is so large that it represents 70% of the overall energy density of the Universe. The Λ in ΛCDM is really just a place-holder, not there for any compelling physical reason but because it is the simplest way of accounting for the observations. In other words, it’s what it is because of Occam’s Razor and nothing more. As with any working hypothesis, the standard cosmological model will get updated whenever new information comes to light (as it is doing now) and/or if we get new physical insights into the origin of dark energy.

    Do the latest observations cast doubt on the standard model? I’d say no. We’re seeing an evolutionary change from “We have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might be a cosmological constant” to “We still have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might not be a cosmological constant”.

    #baryonAcousticOscillations #cosmologicalConstant #Cosmology #DarkEnergy #DarkEnergySpectroscopicInstrument #OccamSRazor #ShaunHotchkiss

  15. Cosmology Results from DESI

    Yesterday evening (10pm Irish Time) saw the release of new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), completing a trio of major announcements of cosmological results in the space of two days (the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Euclid Q1 release being the others). I didn’t see the DESI press conference but you can read the press release here.

    There were no fewer than eight DESI papers on the astro-ph section of the arXiv this morning. Here are the titles with links:

    You can see from the titles that the first seven of these relate to the second data release (DR2; three years of data) from DESI; the last one listed here is a description of the first data release (DR1), which is now publicly available.

    Obviously there is a lot of information to digest in these papers so here are two members of the DESI collaboration talking with Shaun Hotchkiss on Cosmology Talks about the key messages from the analysis of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (the BAO in the titles of the new papers):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRaDtslycE

    A lot has been made in the press coverage of these results about the evidence that the standard cosmological model is incomplete; see, e.g., here. Here are a few comments.

    As I see it, taken on their own, the DESI BAO results are broadly consistent with the ΛCDM model as specified by the parameters determined by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) inferred from Planck. Issues do emerge, however, when these results are combined with other data sets. The most intriguing of these arises with the dark energy contribution. The simplest interpretation of dark energy is that it is a cosmological constant (usually called Λ) which – as explained here – corresponds to a perfect fluid with an equation-of-state p=wρc2 with w=-1. In this case the effective mass density of the dark energy ρ remains constant as the universe expands. To parametrise departures from this constant behaviour, cosmologists have replaced this form with the form w(a)=w0+wa(1-a) where a(t) is the cosmic scale factor. A cosmological constant Λ would correspond to a point (w0=-1, wa=0) in the plane defined by these parameters, but the only requirement for dark energy to result in cosmic acceleration is that w<0 not that w=-1.

    The DESI team allow (w0, wa) to act as free parameters and let the DESI data constrain them, either alone or in combinations with other data sets, finding evidence for departures from the “standard values”. Here’s an example plot:

    The DESI data don’t include the standard point (at the intersection of the two dashed lines) but the discrepancy gets worse when other data (such as supernovae and CMB) are folded in, as in this picture. The weight of evidence suggests a dark energy contribution which is decreasing with time.

    These results are certainly intriguing, and a lot of credit is due to the DESI collaboration for working so hard to identify and remove possible systematics in the analysis (see the papers above) but what do they tell us about ΛCDM?

    My view is that we’ve never known what the dark energy actually is or why it is so large that it represents 70% of the overall energy density of the Universe. The Λ in ΛCDM is really just a place-holder, not there for any compelling physical reason but because it is the simplest way of accounting for the observations. In other words, it’s what it is because of Occam’s Razor and nothing more. As with any working hypothesis, the standard cosmological model will get updated whenever new information comes to light (as it is doing now) and/or if we get new physical insights into the origin of dark energy.

    Do the latest observations cast doubt on the standard model? I’d say no. We’re seeing an evolutionary change from “We have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might be a cosmological constant” to “We still have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might not be a cosmological constant”.

    #baryonAcousticOscillations #cosmologicalConstant #Cosmology #DarkEnergy #DarkEnergySpectroscopicInstrument #OccamSRazor #ShaunHotchkiss

  16. Cosmology Results from DESI

    Yesterday evening (10pm Irish Time) saw the release of new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), completing a trio of major announcements of cosmological results in the space of two days (the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Euclid Q1 release being the others). I didn’t see the DESI press conference but you can read the press release here.

    There were no fewer than eight DESI papers on the astro-ph section of the arXiv this morning. Here are the titles with links:

    You can see from the titles that the first seven of these relate to the second data release (DR2; three years of data) from DESI; the last one listed here is a description of the first data release (DR1), which is now publicly available.

    Obviously there is a lot of information to digest in these papers so here are two members of the DESI collaboration talking with Shaun Hotchkiss on Cosmology Talks about the key messages from the analysis of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (the BAO in the titles of the new papers):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRaDtslycE

    A lot has been made in the press coverage of these results about the evidence that the standard cosmological model is incomplete; see, e.g., here. Here are a few comments.

    As I see it, taken on their own, the DESI BAO results are broadly consistent with the ΛCDM model as specified by the parameters determined by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) inferred from Planck. Issues do emerge, however, when these results are combined with other data sets. The most intriguing of these arises with the dark energy contribution. The simplest interpretation of dark energy is that it is a cosmological constant (usually called Λ) which – as explained here – corresponds to a perfect fluid with an equation-of-state p=wρc2 with w=-1. In this case the effective mass density of the dark energy ρ remains constant as the universe expands. To parametrise departures from this constant behaviour, cosmologists have replaced this form with the form w(a)=w0+wa(1-a) where a(t) is the cosmic scale factor. A cosmological constant Λ would correspond to a point (w0=-1, wa=0) in the plane defined by these parameters, but the only requirement for dark energy to result in cosmic acceleration is that w<0 not that w=-1.

    The DESI team allow (w0, wa) to act as free parameters and let the DESI data constrain them, either alone or in combinations with other data sets, finding evidence for departures from the “standard values”. Here’s an example plot:

    The DESI data don’t include the standard point (at the intersection of the two dashed lines) but the discrepancy gets worse when other data (such as supernovae and CMB) are folded in, as in this picture. The weight of evidence suggests a dark energy contribution which is decreasing with time.

    These results are certainly intriguing, and a lot of credit is due to the DESI collaboration for working so hard to identify and remove possible systematics in the analysis (see the papers above) but what do they tell us about ΛCDM?

    My view is that we’ve never known what the dark energy actually is or why it is so large that it represents 70% of the overall energy density of the Universe. The Λ in ΛCDM is really just a place-holder, not there for any compelling physical reason but because it is the simplest way of accounting for the observations. In other words, it’s what it is because of Occam’s Razor and nothing more. As with any working hypothesis, the standard cosmological model will get updated whenever new information comes to light (as it is doing now) and/or if we get new physical insights into the origin of dark energy.

    Do the latest observations cast doubt on the standard model? I’d say no. We’re seeing an evolutionary change from “We have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might be a cosmological constant” to “We still have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might not be a cosmological constant”.

    #baryonAcousticOscillations #cosmologicalConstant #Cosmology #DarkEnergy #DarkEnergySpectroscopicInstrument #OccamSRazor #ShaunHotchkiss

  17. CW: Long List of Space-related Hashtags & Handles

    Space

    Physical Sciences
    #Astronomy #AstroPhysics #Cosmology

    General
    #AsteroidMining #Asteroids #AsteroidThreat #Astrodon #Astronomers #AstronomyMastodon #AstroPhotography #AstroTuesday #BlackHole #BlackHoles #CelestialBodyLanding #ClearSkies #Comet #Comets #DarkEnergy #DarkMatter #DeepSky #DSOC (Deep Space Optical Communications) #Exoplanets #Galaxy #Galaxies #Gravity #GravitationalWaves #HallEffectThruster #HumanSpaceflight #HumanSpaceflightBasics #HumanSpaceflightHealth #HumanSpaceflightSecurity #ISRU (in situ resource utilization) #LaunchCost #Lunar3dPrinting #MoonMining #NightSky #Observatory #Planetarium #PlanetsryScience #PrivateSpaceflight #Pulsars #Quasars #ReusableLaunchVehicle #RocketEngine #RocketScience #SatelliteImprovement #SatelliteInternetAccess #Satellites #SBSP (Space-based Solar Power) #SmallSat #SolarPhysics #Space #SpaceAgency #SpaceCommunication #SpaceCompany #SpaceCraft #SpaceColonization #SpacecraftComparison #SpacecraftPropulsion #SpaceDebris #Spacedon #SpaceEnergy #SpaceEvent #SpaceExploration #SpaceFood #SpaceForce #SpaceHabitat #SpaceHistory #SpaceHotel #SpaceIndustry #SpaceInfrastructure #SpaceLogistics #SpaceMaintenance #SpaceMastodon #SpaceMining #SpaceNavigation #SpacePhotography #SpacePlants #SpacePolitics #SpacePort #SpaceRegulation #SpaceRobot #SpaceScience #SpaceSciFi #SpaceShip #SpaceScience #SpaceStation #SpaceSuit #SpaceTelescope #SpaceTourism #SpaceWelding #SpaceX #StarGazing @starrytimepod #TimeToOrbit #Universe

    Organisations
    Canadian Space Agency (CSA) 🇨🇦
    #EuropeanSpaceAgency (#ESA) 🇪🇺
    European Space Research Organisation (ESRO) 🇪🇺
    Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (#JAXA) 🇯🇵
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory (#JPL) 🇺🇸
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (#NASA) 🇺🇸
    Space Telescope Science Institute (STSciI) 🇪🇺

    Missions
    #Artemis (#NASAArtemis) #BepiColombo #Cassini COBE #Euclid #EuclidMission #EuropaClipper #Hayabusa2 #InternationalSpaceStation (#ISS) JupiterIcyMoonExplorer (#Juice) #JuiceMission #Juno #Gaia #MMX #Magellan #Voyager1 #Voyager2

    Space Telescopes
    #SpaceTelescope #Telescope

    #ChandraXRay (#Chandra) #ESAEuclid #EventHorizonTelescope #Hubble #HubbleSpaceTelescope (#HST) #IXPE #JamesWebbSpaceTelescope #JWST (#Webb) #Kepler #MIRI #NIRcam #NIRISS #NIRSpec #Spitzer

    Earth Observatories
    #Arecibo 🇵🇷 #AtacamaLargeMillimeterArray (#ALMA) 🇨🇱 #CerroTololo 🇨🇱 #EuropeanSouthernObservatory (#ESO) 🇩🇪 #Haleakala 🇺🇸 #Herschel (#WHT) 🇮🇨 #Keck 🇺🇸 #KittPeak 🇺🇸 #LIGO 🇺🇸 #MaunaKea 🇺🇸 #Paranal 🇨🇱 #Parkes 🇦🇺 #RoqueDeLosMuchachos 🇪🇸 #SquareKilometreArrayObservatory (#SKAO) 🇦🇺 #VeryLargeTelescope (#VLT) 🇨🇱

    Mastodon Observatories
    Abbey Ridge Observatory 🇨🇦 @abbeyridgeobs
    Burke-Gaffney Observatory 🇨🇦 @BGO
    Hamburg Observatory 🇩🇪 @HambObs
    Las Cumbres Observatory 🇦🇺 🇿🇦 🇮🇨 🇨🇱 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🇨🇳 @lco
    Mount Burnett Observatory 🇦🇺 @mbo
    Rubin Observatory 🇨🇱 @VRubinObs
    Stella-Luna Observatory 🇺🇸 @StellaLunaObs
    Westport Observatory 🇺🇸 @WestportObservatory

    Astrophotography
    Andrea Luck @andrealuck
    Astronomy Picture of the Day @APoD
    Cathie LeBlank @cathieleblanc
    Craig Kolb @cek
    Dan Kagelmacher @[email protected]
    David Blanchflower @DavidBflower
    DGMc @Astrobum
    Frank Adler @adfr
    jdsoubeyran @jdsoubeyran
    Kreegan99 @kreegan99
    Landru79 @Landru79
    Loran Hughes @WestwoodAstro
    Mollenberg Observatory @MollenbergSky
    Naztronomy @naz
    Noom @noom
    Philo @philo
    Roger Sliva @[email protected]
    Simeon Schmauß @stim3on
    UniversoMagico @UniversoMagico

    Solar System
    #Sun #SolarCorona
    #KuiperBelt

    Planets
    #Mercury
    #Venus
    #Earth
    #Moon #Lunar
    #Mars
    #Phobos #Deimos
    #Jupiter
    #Callisto #Ganymede #Europa #Io
    #Saturn
    #Enceladus #Mimas #Titan
    #Uranus
    #Ariel #Miranda Titania
    #Neptune
    #Triton

    Dwarf Planets
    #Pluto
    #Charon
    #Ceres
    Makemake
    Haumea
    #Eris

    Hypothetical
    #PlanetX

    Beyond
    OortCloud
    #ProximaCentauri
    #SagittariusA*
    #MilkyWay
    #Andromeda (#M31)
    #Pleiades (#M45)

    (See Sciences for Other Disciplines)

    (See Index for More Hashtags)