"Elite" peer review was studied by Daniel Larremore and colleagues using an anonymised dataset from AAAS of 112,000 papers submitted to Science and Science Advances. A few more desk rejects for women authors, but no difference in peer review. Clear preference for work from prestigious institutions: biased or just better? Big teams also do better.
#ICSSI #ScienceofScience #PeerReview #ScienceMagazine #ScienceAdvances #DanielLarremore #AAAS
#daniellarremore — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #daniellarremore, aggregated by home.social.