home.social

#crimeofaggression — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #crimeofaggression, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @faab64

    Could amount to war crimes?

    The entire #US #Israel attack on #Iran is by its very nature the ultimate #WarCrime according to the #NurembergTribunal which classes the #CrimeOfAggression as such.

  2. @faab64

    Could amount to war crimes?

    The entire #US #Israel attack on #Iran is by its very nature the ultimate #WarCrime according to the #NurembergTribunal which classes the #CrimeOfAggression as such.

  3. Sunday, July 5, 2026

    Inside the Ukrainian military's fight to train, motivate new recruits . . . . . Netherlands confirms it will host Nuremberg-style tribunal for Russia . . . . . New EU steel quotas are a crippling hit to Ukraine's industry . . . . . Russia has lost 1,408,340 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 . . . and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  4. Sunday, July 5, 2026

    Inside the Ukrainian military's fight to train, motivate new recruits . . . . . Netherlands confirms it will host Nuremberg-style tribunal for Russia . . . . . New EU steel quotas are a crippling hit to Ukraine's industry . . . . . Russia has lost 1,408,340 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 . . . and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  5. Sunday, July 5, 2026

    Inside the Ukrainian military's fight to train, motivate new recruits . . . . . Netherlands confirms it will host Nuremberg-style tribunal for Russia . . . . . New EU steel quotas are a crippling hit to Ukraine's industry . . . . . Russia has lost 1,408,340 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 . . . and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  6. Sunday, July 5, 2026

    Inside the Ukrainian military's fight to train, motivate new recruits . . . . . Netherlands confirms it will host Nuremberg-style tribunal for Russia . . . . . New EU steel quotas are a crippling hit to Ukraine's industry . . . . . Russia has lost 1,408,340 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 . . . and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  7. United Nations Resolution 3314: 1974 Aggression Declaration Echoes Loudly Today.


    Posted by Jerry Alatalo | June 8, 2026

    [Editor’s note: After seeing a reference to UN Resolution 3314 on a comments board then studying the resolution, it felt like sharing or disseminating the declaration from 1974 could/would/should provide some measurable benefit in the context of especially dangerous, increasingly aggressive military actions in the Middle East region. Peace.]


    RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

    United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX).
    Definition of Aggression

    December 14, 1974

    The General Assembly,


    Having considered the report of the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression, established pursuant to its resolution 2330(XXII) of 18 December 1967, covering the work of its seventh session held from 11 March to 12 April 1974, including the draft Definition of Aggression adopted by the Special Committee by consensus and recommended for adoption by the General Assembly,[FN1]


    Deeply, convinced that the adoption of the Definition of Aggression would contribute to the strengthening of international peace and security,


    1. Approves the Definition of Aggression, the text of which is annexed to the present resolution;


    2. Expresses its appreciation to the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression for its work which resulted in the elaboration of the Definition of Aggression;


    3. Calls upon all States to refrain from all acts of aggression and other uses of force contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations;[FN2]


    4. Calls the attention of the Security Council to the Definition of Aggression, as set out below, and recommends that it should, as appropriate, take account of that Definition as guidance in determination, in accordance with the Charter, the existence of an act of aggression.


    2319th plenary meeting

    14 December 1974


    Annex


    Definition of Aggression


    The General Assembly,


    Basing itself on the fact that one of the fundamental purposes of the United Nations is to maintain international peace and security and to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace,


    Recalling that the Security Council, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter of the United Nations, shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security,


    Recalling also the duty of States under the Charter to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in order not to endanger international peace, security and justice,


    Bearing in mind that nothing in this Definition shall be interpreted as in any way affecting the scope of the provisions of the Charter with respect to the functions and powers of the organs of the United Nations,


    Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,


    Reaffirming the duty of States not to use armed force to deprive peoples of their right to self-determination, freedom and independence, or to disrupt territorial Integrity,


    Reaffirming also that the territory of a State shall not be violated by being the object, even temporarily, of military occupation or of other measures of force taken by another State in contravention of the Charter, and that it shall not be the object of acquisition by another State resulting from such measures or the threat thereof,


    Reaffirming also the provisions of the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,


    Convinced that the adoption of a definition of aggression ought to have the effect of deterring a potential aggressor, would simplify the determination of acts of aggression and the implementation of measures to suppress them and would also facilitate the protection of the rights and lawful interests of, and the rendering of assistance to, the victim,


    Believing that, although the question whether an act of aggression has been committed must be considered in the light of all the circumstances of each particular case, it is nevertheless desirable to formulate basic principles as guidance for such determination,


    Adopts the following Definition of Aggression:[FN3]


    Article I


    Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.


    Explanatory note: In this Definition the term “State”:


    (a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;


    (b) Includes the concept of a “group of States” where appropriate.


    Article 2


    The First use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter, conclude that a determination that an act of aggression has been committed would not be justified in the light of other relevant circumstances, including the fact that the acts concerned or their consequences are not of sufficient gravity.


    Article 3


    Any of the following acts, regardless of a declaration of war, shall, subject to and in accordance with the provisions of article 2, qualify as an act of aggression:


    (a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof;


    (b) Bombardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State or the use of any weapons by a State against the territory of another State;


    (c) The blockade of the ports or coasts of a State by the armed forces of another State;


    (d) An attack by the armed forces of a State on the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets of another State;


    (e) The use of armed forces of one State which are within the territory of another State with the agreement of the receiving State, in contravention of the conditions provided for in the agreement or any extension of their presence in such territory beyond the termination of the agreement;


    (f) The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State;


    (g) The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another State of such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein.


    Article 4


    The acts enumerated above are not exhaustive and the Security Council may determine that other acts constitute aggression under the provisions of the Charter.


    Article 5


    1. No consideration of whatever nature, whether political, economic, military or otherwise, may serve as a justification for aggression.


    2. A war of aggression is a crime against international peace. Aggression gives rise to international responsibility.


    3. No territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful.


    Article 6


    Nothing in this Definition shall be construed as in any way enlarging or diminishing the scope of the Charter, including its provisions concerning cases in which the use of force is lawful.


    Article 7


    Nothing in this Definition, and in particular article 3, could in any way prejudice the right to self-determination, freedom and independence, as derived from the Charter, of peoples forcibly deprived of that right and referred to in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, particularly peoples under colonial and racist regimes or other forms of alien domination: nor the right of these peoples to struggle to that end and to seek and receive support, in accordance with the principles of the Charter and in conformity with the above-mentioned Declaration.


    Article 8


    In their interpretation and application the above provisions are interrelated and each provision should be construed in the context of the other provisions.


    FOOTNOTES


    1. Official Records of the General Assembly, Twenty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 19 (A/9619 and Corr. 1).


    2. Resolution 2625 (XXV), annex.


    3. Explanatory notes on articles 3 and 5 are to be found in paragraph 20 of the Report of the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression (Official Records of the General Assembly, Twenty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 19 (A/9619 and Corr. 1). Statements on the Definition are contained in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the report of the Sixth Committee (A/9890).

    (Source)

    #CrimeOfAggression #History #InternationalCriminalCourt #InternationalLaw #Iran #Israel #Lebanon #UnitedNations
  8. United Nations Resolution 3314: 1974 Aggression Declaration Echoes Loudly Today.


    Posted by Jerry Alatalo | June 8, 2026

    [Editor’s note: After seeing a reference to UN Resolution 3314 on a comments board then studying the resolution, it felt like sharing or disseminating the declaration from 1974 could/would/should provide some measurable benefit in the context of especially dangerous, increasingly aggressive military actions in the Middle East region. Peace.]


    RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

    United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX).
    Definition of Aggression

    December 14, 1974

    The General Assembly,


    Having considered the report of the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression, established pursuant to its resolution 2330(XXII) of 18 December 1967, covering the work of its seventh session held from 11 March to 12 April 1974, including the draft Definition of Aggression adopted by the Special Committee by consensus and recommended for adoption by the General Assembly,[FN1]


    Deeply, convinced that the adoption of the Definition of Aggression would contribute to the strengthening of international peace and security,


    1. Approves the Definition of Aggression, the text of which is annexed to the present resolution;


    2. Expresses its appreciation to the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression for its work which resulted in the elaboration of the Definition of Aggression;


    3. Calls upon all States to refrain from all acts of aggression and other uses of force contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations;[FN2]


    4. Calls the attention of the Security Council to the Definition of Aggression, as set out below, and recommends that it should, as appropriate, take account of that Definition as guidance in determination, in accordance with the Charter, the existence of an act of aggression.


    2319th plenary meeting

    14 December 1974


    Annex


    Definition of Aggression


    The General Assembly,


    Basing itself on the fact that one of the fundamental purposes of the United Nations is to maintain international peace and security and to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace,


    Recalling that the Security Council, in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter of the United Nations, shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security,


    Recalling also the duty of States under the Charter to settle their international disputes by peaceful means in order not to endanger international peace, security and justice,


    Bearing in mind that nothing in this Definition shall be interpreted as in any way affecting the scope of the provisions of the Charter with respect to the functions and powers of the organs of the United Nations,


    Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,


    Reaffirming the duty of States not to use armed force to deprive peoples of their right to self-determination, freedom and independence, or to disrupt territorial Integrity,


    Reaffirming also that the territory of a State shall not be violated by being the object, even temporarily, of military occupation or of other measures of force taken by another State in contravention of the Charter, and that it shall not be the object of acquisition by another State resulting from such measures or the threat thereof,


    Reaffirming also the provisions of the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,


    Convinced that the adoption of a definition of aggression ought to have the effect of deterring a potential aggressor, would simplify the determination of acts of aggression and the implementation of measures to suppress them and would also facilitate the protection of the rights and lawful interests of, and the rendering of assistance to, the victim,


    Believing that, although the question whether an act of aggression has been committed must be considered in the light of all the circumstances of each particular case, it is nevertheless desirable to formulate basic principles as guidance for such determination,


    Adopts the following Definition of Aggression:[FN3]


    Article I


    Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.


    Explanatory note: In this Definition the term “State”:


    (a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;


    (b) Includes the concept of a “group of States” where appropriate.


    Article 2


    The First use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter, conclude that a determination that an act of aggression has been committed would not be justified in the light of other relevant circumstances, including the fact that the acts concerned or their consequences are not of sufficient gravity.


    Article 3


    Any of the following acts, regardless of a declaration of war, shall, subject to and in accordance with the provisions of article 2, qualify as an act of aggression:


    (a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof;


    (b) Bombardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State or the use of any weapons by a State against the territory of another State;


    (c) The blockade of the ports or coasts of a State by the armed forces of another State;


    (d) An attack by the armed forces of a State on the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets of another State;


    (e) The use of armed forces of one State which are within the territory of another State with the agreement of the receiving State, in contravention of the conditions provided for in the agreement or any extension of their presence in such territory beyond the termination of the agreement;


    (f) The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State;


    (g) The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another State of such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein.


    Article 4


    The acts enumerated above are not exhaustive and the Security Council may determine that other acts constitute aggression under the provisions of the Charter.


    Article 5


    1. No consideration of whatever nature, whether political, economic, military or otherwise, may serve as a justification for aggression.


    2. A war of aggression is a crime against international peace. Aggression gives rise to international responsibility.


    3. No territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful.


    Article 6


    Nothing in this Definition shall be construed as in any way enlarging or diminishing the scope of the Charter, including its provisions concerning cases in which the use of force is lawful.


    Article 7


    Nothing in this Definition, and in particular article 3, could in any way prejudice the right to self-determination, freedom and independence, as derived from the Charter, of peoples forcibly deprived of that right and referred to in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, particularly peoples under colonial and racist regimes or other forms of alien domination: nor the right of these peoples to struggle to that end and to seek and receive support, in accordance with the principles of the Charter and in conformity with the above-mentioned Declaration.


    Article 8


    In their interpretation and application the above provisions are interrelated and each provision should be construed in the context of the other provisions.


    FOOTNOTES


    1. Official Records of the General Assembly, Twenty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 19 (A/9619 and Corr. 1).


    2. Resolution 2625 (XXV), annex.


    3. Explanatory notes on articles 3 and 5 are to be found in paragraph 20 of the Report of the Special Committee on the Question of Defining Aggression (Official Records of the General Assembly, Twenty-ninth Session, Supplement No. 19 (A/9619 and Corr. 1). Statements on the Definition are contained in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the report of the Sixth Committee (A/9890).

    (Source)

    #CrimeOfAggression #History #InternationalCriminalCourt #InternationalLaw #Iran #Israel #Lebanon #UnitedNations
  9. Saturday, April 11, 2026

    Russia's rhetoric on the Iran war reveals it's losing; Kremlin watching a key chess piece slip from the board -- Special tribunal for Russia to move forward; enough countries now committed -- Russian drilling platforms in Caspian Sea hit overnight -- Russia has lost 1,308,670 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 ... and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  10. Saturday, April 11, 2026

    Russia's rhetoric on the Iran war reveals it's losing; Kremlin watching a key chess piece slip from the board -- Special tribunal for Russia to move forward; enough countries now committed -- Russian drilling platforms in Caspian Sea hit overnight -- Russia has lost 1,308,670 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 ... and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  11. Saturday, April 11, 2026

    Russia's rhetoric on the Iran war reveals it's losing; Kremlin watching a key chess piece slip from the board -- Special tribunal for Russia to move forward; enough countries now committed -- Russian drilling platforms in Caspian Sea hit overnight -- Russia has lost 1,308,670 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 ... and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  12. Saturday, April 11, 2026

    Russia's rhetoric on the Iran war reveals it's losing; Kremlin watching a key chess piece slip from the board -- Special tribunal for Russia to move forward; enough countries now committed -- Russian drilling platforms in Caspian Sea hit overnight -- Russia has lost 1,308,670 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 ... and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  13. Saturday, April 11, 2026

    Russia's rhetoric on the Iran war reveals it's losing; Kremlin watching a key chess piece slip from the board -- Special tribunal for Russia to move forward; enough countries now committed -- Russian drilling platforms in Caspian Sea hit overnight -- Russia has lost 1,308,670 troops in Ukraine since Feb. 24, 2022 ... and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026

  14. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

    #CrimeOfAggression

    Article 5

    The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes:

    (a) The crime of #genocide;

    (b) Crimes against humanity;

    (c) War crimes;

    (d) The crime of #aggression.

    legal.un.org/icc/statute/99_co

    #WarCrimes #Trump #US #Putin Russia

  15. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

    #CrimeOfAggression

    Article 5

    The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes:

    (a) The crime of #genocide;

    (b) Crimes against humanity;

    (c) War crimes;

    (d) The crime of #aggression.

    legal.un.org/icc/statute/99_co

    #WarCrimes #Trump #US #Putin Russia

  16. #usa #venezuela : #imperialism / #crimeofaggression / #internationallaw / #uno / #unsc

    „Venezuela sends letter to UN Security Council, condemning U.S. armed aggression

    (…) The letter also put forward four demands: an urgent Security Council meeting to discuss the U.S. aggression, a strong condemnation of the aggression against Venezuela, an immediate halt to U.S. military attacks, and measures to hold Washington accountable for its "crime of aggression."

    xhnewsapi.xinhuaxmt.com/share/

  17. Thursday, June 26, 2025

    Something unknown hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog — Putin insists the Russian economy is fine, but Kremlin officials say otherwise — Donetsk Oblast city ‘on brink of humanitarian catastrophe,’ governor says as drones cripple infrastructure — America signals support for sending more Patriot missiles to Ukraine … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  18. Thursday, June 26, 2025

    Something unknown hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog — Putin insists the Russian economy is fine, but Kremlin officials say otherwise — Donetsk Oblast city ‘on brink of humanitarian catastrophe,’ governor says as drones cripple infrastructure — America signals support for sending more Patriot missiles to Ukraine … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  19. Thursday, June 26, 2025

    Something unknown hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog — Putin insists the Russian economy is fine, but Kremlin officials say otherwise — Donetsk Oblast city ‘on brink of humanitarian catastrophe,’ governor says as drones cripple infrastructure — America signals support for sending more Patriot missiles to Ukraine … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  20. Thursday, June 26, 2025

    Something unknown hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog — Putin insists the Russian economy is fine, but Kremlin officials say otherwise — Donetsk Oblast city ‘on brink of humanitarian catastrophe,’ governor says as drones cripple infrastructure — America signals support for sending more Patriot missiles to Ukraine … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  21. Thursday, June 26, 2025

    Something unknown hits key Russian drone facility in Taganrog — Putin insists the Russian economy is fine, but Kremlin officials say otherwise — Donetsk Oblast city ‘on brink of humanitarian catastrophe,’ governor says as drones cripple infrastructure — America signals support for sending more Patriot missiles to Ukraine … and more

    activitypub.writeworks.uk/2025

  22. Good news: a small but solid step to deprecate the #CrimeOfAggression - the Council of Europe has created a tribunal to prosecute the RU full-scale invasion of UA [1].

    Meanwhile, back on a ranch, the US invasion of Iraq awaits the year 2103 (TBC) for the creation of a crime-of-aggression tribunal [2] and this year's Israeli+US bombing of Iran awaits the year 2125 (TBC) for a crime-of-aggression tribunal [3].

    [1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_

    [2] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_

    [3] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_

  23. Good news: a small but solid step to deprecate the #CrimeOfAggression - the Council of Europe has created a tribunal to prosecute the RU full-scale invasion of UA [1].

    Meanwhile, back on a ranch, the US invasion of Iraq awaits the year 2103 (TBC) for the creation of a crime-of-aggression tribunal [2] and this year's Israeli+US bombing of Iran awaits the year 2125 (TBC) for a crime-of-aggression tribunal [3].

    [1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_

    [2] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_

    [3] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_

  24. BREAKING: Today, a group of European ministers traveled to Lviv to reaffirm their strong support for a Special International Tribunal for the #CrimeOfAggression against #Ukraine —urging other states and int'l orgs to actively back justice for this leadership crime. mfa.gov.ua/en/news/lviv...

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of...

  25. @smaurizi A #Manicheist approach to defending Europe against the current RU #CrimeOfAggression and likely future RU crimes of aggression is more likely to split than unite pro-human-rights groups+individuals (cf [1][2]).

    Calling for e.g. 1% of EU GDP to be invested in concrete, evidence-based #peace tools [3] (not just abstract postmodernist blabla) *would* be able to unite many people+groups.

    #Manicheism

    [1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pak

    [2] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodia

    [3] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template

  26. @smaurizi A #Manicheist approach to defending Europe against the current RU #CrimeOfAggression and likely future RU crimes of aggression is more likely to split than unite pro-human-rights groups+individuals (cf [1][2]).

    Calling for e.g. 1% of EU GDP to be invested in concrete, evidence-based #peace tools [3] (not just abstract postmodernist blabla) *would* be able to unite many people+groups.

    #Manicheism

    [1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pak

    [2] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodia

    [3] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template

  27. CW: uspol, nukes

    @legoktm @nemobis

    While the #TrumpMuskRegime statements are about 99% ignorant nonsense, there are a few bits of wisdom:

    - Trump describes the deaths in the Russian invasion of Ukraine as "ridiculous", which is accurate - but he and Hesgeth refuse to admit that it's a Russian invasion = #CrimeOfAggression .

    - Trump is right that investing in the nuclear arms race is extremely unproductive.

    The Trump-Musk regime is a sudden jump in phase space [1].

    [1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_

  28. @nemo that's why I think #Gaza must be freed from the #Hamas.

    After all, #IDF literally confirms what Hamas has proudly shown to #RT: They literally placed their #HQ below #AlShifa #Hospital and that alone is a #warcrime.

    I am also not understanding those that demand a #ceasefire yet don't condem the #CrimeOfAggression and #WarCrimes committed on #O7.

    Cuz even if #Netanyahu refused to act upon #INTEL by #ShinBet and #Mossad that doesn't mean the Hamas is to blame.

  29. @jeremy_pm technically #Hamas shot first thus they committed the #CrimeOfAggression, so my sympathy for said Aggressors is nonexistant based off theor attacks against unarmed civilians, taking children.as hostages and the entire population of #Gaza as human shields.

    They knew the #ForeseeableConsequences of their athrocidies committed on #O7 and they even announced that they want to do it again.

    So what else do you expect?