home.social

#creationists — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #creationists, aggregated by home.social.

  1. #Creationists love the idea that the #genetic #code and #computer code are fundamentally the same thing. Since of course #programs are #designed (not always #intelligently, but that's another post) they think this is proof that life was too.

    They seize on one-liners from those they regard as infidels and heretics, because then they can say, "See? Even unbelievers admit that ..." Bill Gates and Richard Dawkins, both known for going outside their lanes, are popular choices. Gates: "#DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created." Dawkins: "I'm fascinated by the idea that genetics is digital. A #gene is a long sequence of coded letters, like computer information."

    I get why this is a popular analogy. Unfortunately, it's also a bad one. Those of us with one foot in each field know the differences far outweigh the similarities. Which leads me to the following epigram:

    Many #programmers say genes look like code. Many #biologists say code looks like genes. No #bioinformaticist says either.

  2. #Creationists love the idea that the #genetic #code and #computer code are fundamentally the same thing. Since of course #programs are #designed (not always #intelligently, but that's another post) they think this is proof that life was too.

    They seize on one-liners from those they regard as infidels and heretics, because then they can say, "See? Even unbelievers admit that ..." Bill Gates and Richard Dawkins, both known for going outside their lanes, are popular choices. Gates: "#DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created." Dawkins: "I'm fascinated by the idea that genetics is digital. A #gene is a long sequence of coded letters, like computer information."

    I get why this is a popular analogy. Unfortunately, it's also a bad one. Those of us with one foot in each field know the differences far outweigh the similarities. Which leads me to the following epigram:

    Many #programmers say genes look like code. Many #biologists say code looks like genes. No #bioinformaticist says either.

  3. #Creationists love the idea that the #genetic #code and #computer code are fundamentally the same thing. Since of course #programs are #designed (not always #intelligently, but that's another post) they think this is proof that life was too.

    They seize on one-liners from those they regard as infidels and heretics, because then they can say, "See? Even unbelievers admit that ..." Bill Gates and Richard Dawkins, both known for going outside their lanes, are popular choices. Gates: "#DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created." Dawkins: "I'm fascinated by the idea that genetics is digital. A #gene is a long sequence of coded letters, like computer information."

    I get why this is a popular analogy. Unfortunately, it's also a bad one. Those of us with one foot in each field know the differences far outweigh the similarities. Which leads me to the following epigram:

    Many #programmers say genes look like code. Many #biologists say code looks like genes. No #bioinformaticist says either.

  4. #Creationists love the idea that the #genetic #code and #computer code are fundamentally the same thing. Since of course #programs are #designed (not always #intelligently, but that's another post) they think this is proof that life was too.

    They seize on one-liners from those they regard as infidels and heretics, because then they can say, "See? Even unbelievers admit that ..." Bill Gates and Richard Dawkins, both known for going outside their lanes, are popular choices. Gates: "#DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created." Dawkins: "I'm fascinated by the idea that genetics is digital. A #gene is a long sequence of coded letters, like computer information."

    I get why this is a popular analogy. Unfortunately, it's also a bad one. Those of us with one foot in each field know the differences far outweigh the similarities. Which leads me to the following epigram:

    Many #programmers say genes look like code. Many #biologists say code looks like genes. No #bioinformaticist says either.

  5. Young-Earth #Creationists Debunked (Again)

    YECs claimed the lack of old #supernova remnants proved a young #universe. Wrong.

    New #Radioteleskope surveys in #Australia just found dozens of ancient supernova remnants that were too faint to detect before.

    The "missing" remnants weren't missing - they were just hard to see because they fade over time and emit mainly radio waves.

    Bottom line: The universe is old. Science wins. 🔭

    @badastro mastodon.social/@badastro/1155

  6. Young-Earth #Creationists Debunked (Again)

    YECs claimed the lack of old #supernova remnants proved a young #universe. Wrong.

    New #Radioteleskope surveys in #Australia just found dozens of ancient supernova remnants that were too faint to detect before.

    The "missing" remnants weren't missing - they were just hard to see because they fade over time and emit mainly radio waves.

    Bottom line: The universe is old. Science wins. 🔭

    @badastro mastodon.social/@badastro/1155

  7. Young-Earth #Creationists Debunked (Again)

    YECs claimed the lack of old #supernova remnants proved a young #universe. Wrong.

    New #Radioteleskope surveys in #Australia just found dozens of ancient supernova remnants that were too faint to detect before.

    The "missing" remnants weren't missing - they were just hard to see because they fade over time and emit mainly radio waves.

    Bottom line: The universe is old. Science wins. 🔭

    @badastro mastodon.social/@badastro/1155

  8. Young-Earth #Creationists Debunked (Again)

    YECs claimed the lack of old #supernova remnants proved a young #universe. Wrong.

    New #Radioteleskope surveys in #Australia just found dozens of ancient supernova remnants that were too faint to detect before.

    The "missing" remnants weren't missing - they were just hard to see because they fade over time and emit mainly radio waves.

    Bottom line: The universe is old. Science wins. 🔭

    @badastro mastodon.social/@badastro/1155

  9. Young-Earth #Creationists Debunked (Again)

    YECs claimed the lack of old #supernova remnants proved a young #universe. Wrong.

    New #Radioteleskope surveys in #Australia just found dozens of ancient supernova remnants that were too faint to detect before.

    The "missing" remnants weren't missing - they were just hard to see because they fade over time and emit mainly radio waves.

    Bottom line: The universe is old. Science wins. 🔭

    @badastro mastodon.social/@badastro/1155

  10. Less than two weeks in, and already the #creationists are stirring - freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngul "they can’t just switch to stuffing creationism into science curricula (yet), so they instead water down and weaken the science, replacing “#evolution” with fuzzy pseudonyms." #trump #antiscience

  11. Less than two weeks in, and already the #creationists are stirring - freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngul "they can’t just switch to stuffing creationism into science curricula (yet), so they instead water down and weaken the science, replacing “#evolution” with fuzzy pseudonyms." #trump #antiscience

  12. Less than two weeks in, and already the #creationists are stirring - freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngul "they can’t just switch to stuffing creationism into science curricula (yet), so they instead water down and weaken the science, replacing “#evolution” with fuzzy pseudonyms." #trump #antiscience

  13. Less than two weeks in, and already the #creationists are stirring - freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngul "they can’t just switch to stuffing creationism into science curricula (yet), so they instead water down and weaken the science, replacing “#evolution” with fuzzy pseudonyms." #trump #antiscience

  14. Less than two weeks in, and already the #creationists are stirring - freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngul "they can’t just switch to stuffing creationism into science curricula (yet), so they instead water down and weaken the science, replacing “#evolution” with fuzzy pseudonyms." #trump #antiscience

  15. Good look at a bad problem. The author is a friend from grad schol at the #University of #Colorado, where she was a faculty member when I was a grad student. She’s since gone on to bigger and better things, and I’ve gone on to … well, things.

    Anyway. I’ve never been particularly worried about #Cylons, #Skynet, etc. Humans doing stupid human tricks, and using #AI to do them much faster, OTOH, yeah.

    The internet community of anti-science #cranks is an example of #model #collapse happening at human speed. #Antivaxers, #creationists, #climate change #deniers et al. prey on people with legitimate questions about some particular aspect of the broad #consensus. Those people often go down an increasingly loony rabbit hole, and end up propagating the absurdity, sometimes adding their own bizarre spin which their new-found colleagues happily add to the ideology.

    If this becomes part of the #academic ecosystem, with AI reviewers approving AI-generated #papers and no human checks on the process, the scholarly corpus will become hopelessly contaminated. I have no idea what to do about that.

    theconversation.com/a-new-ai-s

  16. Good look at a bad problem. The author is a friend from grad schol at the #University of #Colorado, where she was a faculty member when I was a grad student. She’s since gone on to bigger and better things, and I’ve gone on to … well, things.

    Anyway. I’ve never been particularly worried about #Cylons, #Skynet, etc. Humans doing stupid human tricks, and using #AI to do them much faster, OTOH, yeah.

    The internet community of anti-science #cranks is an example of #model #collapse happening at human speed. #Antivaxers, #creationists, #climate change #deniers et al. prey on people with legitimate questions about some particular aspect of the broad #consensus. Those people often go down an increasingly loony rabbit hole, and end up propagating the absurdity, sometimes adding their own bizarre spin which their new-found colleagues happily add to the ideology.

    If this becomes part of the #academic ecosystem, with AI reviewers approving AI-generated #papers and no human checks on the process, the scholarly corpus will become hopelessly contaminated. I have no idea what to do about that.

    theconversation.com/a-new-ai-s

  17. Good look at a bad problem. The author is a friend from grad schol at the #University of #Colorado, where she was a faculty member when I was a grad student. She’s since gone on to bigger and better things, and I’ve gone on to … well, things.

    Anyway. I’ve never been particularly worried about #Cylons, #Skynet, etc. Humans doing stupid human tricks, and using #AI to do them much faster, OTOH, yeah.

    The internet community of anti-science #cranks is an example of #model #collapse happening at human speed. #Antivaxers, #creationists, #climate change #deniers et al. prey on people with legitimate questions about some particular aspect of the broad #consensus. Those people often go down an increasingly loony rabbit hole, and end up propagating the absurdity, sometimes adding their own bizarre spin which their new-found colleagues happily add to the ideology.

    If this becomes part of the #academic ecosystem, with AI reviewers approving AI-generated #papers and no human checks on the process, the scholarly corpus will become hopelessly contaminated. I have no idea what to do about that.

    theconversation.com/a-new-ai-s

  18. Good look at a bad problem. The author is a friend from grad schol at the #University of #Colorado, where she was a faculty member when I was a grad student. She’s since gone on to bigger and better things, and I’ve gone on to … well, things.

    Anyway. I’ve never been particularly worried about #Cylons, #Skynet, etc. Humans doing stupid human tricks, and using #AI to do them much faster, OTOH, yeah.

    The internet community of anti-science #cranks is an example of #model #collapse happening at human speed. #Antivaxers, #creationists, #climate change #deniers et al. prey on people with legitimate questions about some particular aspect of the broad #consensus. Those people often go down an increasingly loony rabbit hole, and end up propagating the absurdity, sometimes adding their own bizarre spin which their new-found colleagues happily add to the ideology.

    If this becomes part of the #academic ecosystem, with AI reviewers approving AI-generated #papers and no human checks on the process, the scholarly corpus will become hopelessly contaminated. I have no idea what to do about that.

    theconversation.com/a-new-ai-s

  19. It’s so cute when #creationists try to sound sciencey. Like little kids misusing big words to try to impress the grown-ups.

  20. It’s so cute when #creationists try to sound sciencey. Like little kids misusing big words to try to impress the grown-ups.

  21. It’s so cute when #creationists try to sound sciencey. Like little kids misusing big words to try to impress the grown-ups.