home.social

#cosmological-constant — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #cosmological-constant, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Scientists Think Ghost Particles Could Be Storing Their Mass in a Hidden Dimension

    “Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links.” Here’s what you’ll…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Physics #cosmologicalconstant #KATRIN #Science
    newsbeep.com/us/615902/

  2. Scientists Think Ghost Particles Could Be Storing Their Mass in a Hidden Dimension

    “Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links.” Here’s what you’ll…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Physics #cosmologicalconstant #KATRIN #Science
    newsbeep.com/us/615902/

  3. Scientists Think Ghost Particles Could Be Storing Their Mass in a Hidden Dimension

    “Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links.” Here’s what you’ll…
    #NewsBeep #News #Physics #AU #Australia #cosmologicalconstant #KATRIN #Science
    newsbeep.com/au/641305/

  4. Scientists Think Ghost Particles Could Be Storing Their Mass in a Hidden Dimension

    “Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links.” Here’s what you’ll…
    #NewsBeep #News #Physics #AU #Australia #cosmologicalconstant #KATRIN #Science
    newsbeep.com/au/641305/

  5. Scientists Think Ghost Particles Could Be Storing Their Mass in a Hidden Dimension

    “Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links.” Here’s what you’ll…
    #NewsBeep #News #Physics #cosmologicalconstant #Katrin #Science #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/559309/

  6. The universe may end trillions of years sooner than we thought

    When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Astronomers…
    #NewsBeep #News #Space #bigcrunch #cosmologicalconstant #DarkEnergy #expansionrate #fateoftheuniverse #Science #TheUniverse #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/555298/

  7. The #CosmologicalConstant from a Quantum Gravitational θ-Vacua and the Gravitational Hall Effect: arxiv.org/abs/2506.14886 -> Could the mathematical ‘shape’ of the universe solve the cosmological constant problem? brown.edu/news/2026-04-20/cosm

  8. The #CosmologicalConstant from a Quantum Gravitational θ-Vacua and the Gravitational Hall Effect: arxiv.org/abs/2506.14886 -> Could the mathematical ‘shape’ of the universe solve the cosmological constant problem? brown.edu/news/2026-04-20/cosm

  9. The #CosmologicalConstant from a Quantum Gravitational θ-Vacua and the Gravitational Hall Effect: arxiv.org/abs/2506.14886 -> Could the mathematical ‘shape’ of the universe solve the cosmological constant problem? brown.edu/news/2026-04-20/cosm

  10. The #CosmologicalConstant from a Quantum Gravitational θ-Vacua and the Gravitational Hall Effect: arxiv.org/abs/2506.14886 -> Could the mathematical ‘shape’ of the universe solve the cosmological constant problem? brown.edu/news/2026-04-20/cosm

  11. The #CosmologicalConstant from a Quantum Gravitational θ-Vacua and the Gravitational Hall Effect: arxiv.org/abs/2506.14886 -> Could the mathematical ‘shape’ of the universe solve the cosmological constant problem? brown.edu/news/2026-04-20/cosm

  12. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  13. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  14. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  15. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  16. While the holy grail of #InhomogeneousCosmology is to explain #DarkEnergy as an epiphenomenon of the cosmologically recent formation epoch of #CosmicVoids and other #LargeScaleStructure, #YonadavBarryGinat and #PedroGFerreira have gone for a more modest goal: keeping the #CosmologicalConstant but tacking on void formation to get a sort-of #BeyondLCDM inhomogeneous model that better matches #DES and #DESI results [1].

    #ArXiv_2601_20633
    @cosmology #Cosmology #LCDM

    [1] arxiv.org/abs/2601.20633

  17. You’re Living Alongside Invisible Wormholes, Scientists Say—and They May Be Warping Your Reality

    Churning nano-wormholes could explain the clash in our cosmological constants. The wormholes add magnitude to a math parameter…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Science #AmericanPhysicalSociety #cosmologicalconstant #DarkEnergy #ordersofmagnitude #scientists
    newsbeep.com/us/298368/

  18. You’re Living Alongside Invisible Wormholes, Scientists Say—and They May Be Warping Your Reality

    Churning nano-wormholes could explain the clash in our cosmological constants. The wormholes add magnitude to a math parameter…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Science #AmericanPhysicalSociety #cosmologicalconstant #DarkEnergy #ordersofmagnitude #scientists
    newsbeep.com/us/298368/

  19. Men will contemplate the existence of 10^120 multiple infinite universes rather than admit there might be a god. #cosmologicalconstant

  20. Men will contemplate the existence of 10^120 multiple infinite universes rather than admit there might be a god. #cosmologicalconstant

  21. Men will contemplate the existence of 10^120 multiple infinite universes rather than admit there might be a god. #cosmologicalconstant

  22. Men will contemplate the existence of 10^120 multiple infinite universes rather than admit there might be a god. #cosmologicalconstant

  23. Men will contemplate the existence of 10^120 multiple infinite universes rather than admit there might be a god. #cosmologicalconstant

  24. Here is my next YouTube short about the great discovery by David Benisty et al. that the cosmological constant can be inferred from the Milky Way and Andromeda system! This is so important because it's a complementary probe to the CMB (Planck, ACT, etc.).
    youtube.com/shorts/mwF0HhSu5yM

    #astronomy #astrophysics #scicomm #outreach #CosmologicalConstant #YouTube

  25. Here is my next YouTube short about the great discovery by David Benisty et al. that the cosmological constant can be inferred from the Milky Way and Andromeda system! This is so important because it's a complementary probe to the CMB (Planck, ACT, etc.).
    youtube.com/shorts/mwF0HhSu5yM

    #astronomy #astrophysics #scicomm #outreach #CosmologicalConstant #YouTube

  26. Here is my next YouTube short about the great discovery by David Benisty et al. that the cosmological constant can be inferred from the Milky Way and Andromeda system! This is so important because it's a complementary probe to the CMB (Planck, ACT, etc.).
    youtube.com/shorts/mwF0HhSu5yM

    #astronomy #astrophysics #scicomm #outreach #CosmologicalConstant #YouTube

  27. Here is my next YouTube short about the great discovery by David Benisty et al. that the cosmological constant can be inferred from the Milky Way and Andromeda system! This is so important because it's a complementary probe to the CMB (Planck, ACT, etc.).
    youtube.com/shorts/mwF0HhSu5yM

    #astronomy #astrophysics #scicomm #outreach #CosmologicalConstant #YouTube

  28. Huh, we may live in the Boondocks of the Universe.

    I found it really interesting, but we may be in the middle of the largest known super void in the universe.

    Recent discovery. It's called the KBC void, and is about a billion light-years across or so.

    It's the best explanation #astronomy has come up with for the discrepancy in the #CosmologicalConstant and is probably a good thing. Cuz we are less likely to have extreme events happen to us.

    #science #randomthoughts #cool

  29. Huh, we may live in the Boondocks of the Universe.

    I found it really interesting, but we may be in the middle of the largest known super void in the universe.

    Recent discovery. It's called the KBC void, and is about a billion light-years across or so.

    It's the best explanation #astronomy has come up with for the discrepancy in the #CosmologicalConstant and is probably a good thing. Cuz we are less likely to have extreme events happen to us.

    #science #randomthoughts #cool

  30. Huh, we may live in the Boondocks of the Universe.

    I found it really interesting, but we may be in the middle of the largest known super void in the universe.

    Recent discovery. It's called the KBC void, and is about a billion light-years across or so.

    It's the best explanation #astronomy has come up with for the discrepancy in the #CosmologicalConstant and is probably a good thing. Cuz we are less likely to have extreme events happen to us.

    #science #randomthoughts #cool

  31. Huh, we may live in the Boondocks of the Universe.

    I found it really interesting, but we may be in the middle of the largest known super void in the universe.

    Recent discovery. It's called the KBC void, and is about a billion light-years across or so.

    It's the best explanation #astronomy has come up with for the discrepancy in the #CosmologicalConstant and is probably a good thing. Cuz we are less likely to have extreme events happen to us.

    #science #randomthoughts #cool

  32. Huh, we may live in the Boondocks of the Universe.

    I found it really interesting, but we may be in the middle of the largest known super void in the universe.

    Recent discovery. It's called the KBC void, and is about a billion light-years across or so.

    It's the best explanation #astronomy has come up with for the discrepancy in the #CosmologicalConstant and is probably a good thing. Cuz we are less likely to have extreme events happen to us.

    #science #randomthoughts #cool

  33. Cosmology Results from DESI

    Yesterday evening (10pm Irish Time) saw the release of new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), completing a trio of major announcements of cosmological results in the space of two days (the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Euclid Q1 release being the others). I didn’t see the DESI press conference but you can read the press release here.

    There were no fewer than eight DESI papers on the astro-ph section of the arXiv this morning. Here are the titles with links:

    You can see from the titles that the first seven of these relate to the second data release (DR2; three years of data) from DESI; the last one listed here is a description of the first data release (DR1), which is now publicly available.

    Obviously there is a lot of information to digest in these papers so here are two members of the DESI collaboration talking with Shaun Hotchkiss on Cosmology Talks about the key messages from the analysis of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (the BAO in the titles of the new papers):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRaDtslycE

    A lot has been made in the press coverage of these results about the evidence that the standard cosmological model is incomplete; see, e.g., here. Here are a few comments.

    As I see it, taken on their own, the DESI BAO results are broadly consistent with the ΛCDM model as specified by the parameters determined by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) inferred from Planck. Issues do emerge, however, when these results are combined with other data sets. The most intriguing of these arises with the dark energy contribution. The simplest interpretation of dark energy is that it is a cosmological constant (usually called Λ) which – as explained here – corresponds to a perfect fluid with an equation-of-state p=wρc2 with w=-1. In this case the effective mass density of the dark energy ρ remains constant as the universe expands. To parametrise departures from this constant behaviour, cosmologists have replaced this form with the form w(a)=w0+wa(1-a) where a(t) is the cosmic scale factor. A cosmological constant Λ would correspond to a point (w0=-1, wa=0) in the plane defined by these parameters, but the only requirement for dark energy to result in cosmic acceleration is that w<0 not that w=-1.

    The DESI team allow (w0, wa) to act as free parameters and let the DESI data constrain them, either alone or in combinations with other data sets, finding evidence for departures from the “standard values”. Here’s an example plot:

    The DESI data don’t include the standard point (at the intersection of the two dashed lines) but the discrepancy gets worse when other data (such as supernovae and CMB) are folded in, as in this picture. The weight of evidence suggests a dark energy contribution which is decreasing with time.

    These results are certainly intriguing, and a lot of credit is due to the DESI collaboration for working so hard to identify and remove possible systematics in the analysis (see the papers above) but what do they tell us about ΛCDM?

    My view is that we’ve never known what the dark energy actually is or why it is so large that it represents 70% of the overall energy density of the Universe. The Λ in ΛCDM is really just a place-holder, not there for any compelling physical reason but because it is the simplest way of accounting for the observations. In other words, it’s what it is because of Occam’s Razor and nothing more. As with any working hypothesis, the standard cosmological model will get updated whenever new information comes to light (as it is doing now) and/or if we get new physical insights into the origin of dark energy.

    Do the latest observations cast doubt on the standard model? I’d say no. We’re seeing an evolutionary change from “We have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might be a cosmological constant” to “We still have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might not be a cosmological constant”.

    #baryonAcousticOscillations #cosmologicalConstant #Cosmology #DarkEnergy #DarkEnergySpectroscopicInstrument #OccamSRazor #ShaunHotchkiss

  34. Cosmology Results from DESI

    Yesterday evening (10pm Irish Time) saw the release of new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), completing a trio of major announcements of cosmological results in the space of two days (the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Euclid Q1 release being the others). I didn’t see the DESI press conference but you can read the press release here.

    There were no fewer than eight DESI papers on the astro-ph section of the arXiv this morning. Here are the titles with links:

    You can see from the titles that the first seven of these relate to the second data release (DR2; three years of data) from DESI; the last one listed here is a description of the first data release (DR1), which is now publicly available.

    Obviously there is a lot of information to digest in these papers so here are two members of the DESI collaboration talking with Shaun Hotchkiss on Cosmology Talks about the key messages from the analysis of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (the BAO in the titles of the new papers):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRaDtslycE

    A lot has been made in the press coverage of these results about the evidence that the standard cosmological model is incomplete; see, e.g., here. Here are a few comments.

    As I see it, taken on their own, the DESI BAO results are broadly consistent with the ΛCDM model as specified by the parameters determined by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) inferred from Planck. Issues do emerge, however, when these results are combined with other data sets. The most intriguing of these arises with the dark energy contribution. The simplest interpretation of dark energy is that it is a cosmological constant (usually called Λ) which – as explained here – corresponds to a perfect fluid with an equation-of-state p=wρc2 with w=-1. In this case the effective mass density of the dark energy ρ remains constant as the universe expands. To parametrise departures from this constant behaviour, cosmologists have replaced this form with the form w(a)=w0+wa(1-a) where a(t) is the cosmic scale factor. A cosmological constant Λ would correspond to a point (w0=-1, wa=0) in the plane defined by these parameters, but the only requirement for dark energy to result in cosmic acceleration is that w<0 not that w=-1.

    The DESI team allow (w0, wa) to act as free parameters and let the DESI data constrain them, either alone or in combinations with other data sets, finding evidence for departures from the “standard values”. Here’s an example plot:

    The DESI data don’t include the standard point (at the intersection of the two dashed lines) but the discrepancy gets worse when other data (such as supernovae and CMB) are folded in, as in this picture. The weight of evidence suggests a dark energy contribution which is decreasing with time.

    These results are certainly intriguing, and a lot of credit is due to the DESI collaboration for working so hard to identify and remove possible systematics in the analysis (see the papers above) but what do they tell us about ΛCDM?

    My view is that we’ve never known what the dark energy actually is or why it is so large that it represents 70% of the overall energy density of the Universe. The Λ in ΛCDM is really just a place-holder, not there for any compelling physical reason but because it is the simplest way of accounting for the observations. In other words, it’s what it is because of Occam’s Razor and nothing more. As with any working hypothesis, the standard cosmological model will get updated whenever new information comes to light (as it is doing now) and/or if we get new physical insights into the origin of dark energy.

    Do the latest observations cast doubt on the standard model? I’d say no. We’re seeing an evolutionary change from “We have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might be a cosmological constant” to “We still have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might not be a cosmological constant”.

    #baryonAcousticOscillations #cosmologicalConstant #Cosmology #DarkEnergy #DarkEnergySpectroscopicInstrument #OccamSRazor #ShaunHotchkiss

  35. Cosmology Results from DESI

    Yesterday evening (10pm Irish Time) saw the release of new results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), completing a trio of major announcements of cosmological results in the space of two days (the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Euclid Q1 release being the others). I didn’t see the DESI press conference but you can read the press release here.

    There were no fewer than eight DESI papers on the astro-ph section of the arXiv this morning. Here are the titles with links:

    You can see from the titles that the first seven of these relate to the second data release (DR2; three years of data) from DESI; the last one listed here is a description of the first data release (DR1), which is now publicly available.

    Obviously there is a lot of information to digest in these papers so here are two members of the DESI collaboration talking with Shaun Hotchkiss on Cosmology Talks about the key messages from the analysis of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (the BAO in the titles of the new papers):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRaDtslycE

    A lot has been made in the press coverage of these results about the evidence that the standard cosmological model is incomplete; see, e.g., here. Here are a few comments.

    As I see it, taken on their own, the DESI BAO results are broadly consistent with the ΛCDM model as specified by the parameters determined by the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) inferred from Planck. Issues do emerge, however, when these results are combined with other data sets. The most intriguing of these arises with the dark energy contribution. The simplest interpretation of dark energy is that it is a cosmological constant (usually called Λ) which – as explained here – corresponds to a perfect fluid with an equation-of-state p=wρc2 with w=-1. In this case the effective mass density of the dark energy ρ remains constant as the universe expands. To parametrise departures from this constant behaviour, cosmologists have replaced this form with the form w(a)=w0+wa(1-a) where a(t) is the cosmic scale factor. A cosmological constant Λ would correspond to a point (w0=-1, wa=0) in the plane defined by these parameters, but the only requirement for dark energy to result in cosmic acceleration is that w<0 not that w=-1.

    The DESI team allow (w0, wa) to act as free parameters and let the DESI data constrain them, either alone or in combinations with other data sets, finding evidence for departures from the “standard values”. Here’s an example plot:

    The DESI data don’t include the standard point (at the intersection of the two dashed lines) but the discrepancy gets worse when other data (such as supernovae and CMB) are folded in, as in this picture. The weight of evidence suggests a dark energy contribution which is decreasing with time.

    These results are certainly intriguing, and a lot of credit is due to the DESI collaboration for working so hard to identify and remove possible systematics in the analysis (see the papers above) but what do they tell us about ΛCDM?

    My view is that we’ve never known what the dark energy actually is or why it is so large that it represents 70% of the overall energy density of the Universe. The Λ in ΛCDM is really just a place-holder, not there for any compelling physical reason but because it is the simplest way of accounting for the observations. In other words, it’s what it is because of Occam’s Razor and nothing more. As with any working hypothesis, the standard cosmological model will get updated whenever new information comes to light (as it is doing now) and/or if we get new physical insights into the origin of dark energy.

    Do the latest observations cast doubt on the standard model? I’d say no. We’re seeing an evolutionary change from “We have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might be a cosmological constant” to “We still have no idea what the dark energy is but we think it might not be a cosmological constant”.

    #baryonAcousticOscillations #cosmologicalConstant #Cosmology #DarkEnergy #DarkEnergySpectroscopicInstrument #OccamSRazor #ShaunHotchkiss