#collaborators — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #collaborators, aggregated by home.social.
-
🇬🇧Looking Away. Why Silence Is Not Neutral
Introduction: What Happens When We Say Nothing?
Three MonkeysIn a world rife with conflict, injustice, and human rights violations, a pressing question arises: Are we allowed to remain silent when wrongdoing occurs? The answer is more complicated than it first appears. Because silence is never neutral — it is always a choice with consequences.
This essay explores why deliberate looking away, indifference, and passive behaviour are not harmless attitudes. Often, they amount to tacit complicity in injustice. We connect philosophical ideas with historical examples and personal reflections. The goal is to show: silence can be a form of complicity.
1. What Do We Mean by “Silence”?
Before addressing the moral dimension, we need to clarify the different forms of silence.
The first form is willful ignorance. This means deliberately looking away to avoid accountability. An example would be an organisation that knows about human rights violations but remains silent for political reasons.
The second form is indifference. Here, any moral or emotional reaction to suffering is absent. For instance, when a citizen learns about corruption in their community but draws no consequences whatsoever.
The third form is pacifism — and here one must draw a distinction. There is active and passive pacifism. Active pacifism means peaceful resistance through protest, boycotts, or civil disobedience — as exemplified by Mahatma Gandhi or Martin Luther King. Passive pacifism, on the other hand, merely means avoiding violence without advocating for justice — and thereby permitting injustice.
Tacit approval arises when silence is understood as indirect endorsement of wrongdoing. And collaboration in this context means: one sustains an unjust system simply by tolerating it.
2. Why Is Silence Morally Problematic?
To grasp the moral dimension, it helps to consider three ethical perspectives.
2.1 Consequentialism: What Does My Silence Cause?
Consequentialism poses a highly practical question: What impact does my action — or indeed my inaction — have? If silence allows violence to continue or persist longer, it becomes co-responsibility.
One example is churches that remain silent during wartime atrocities. The Russian Orthodox Church should have condemned Putin’s war. Its silence indirectly lent support to the actions and undermined its own moral authority. The same applies to companies that are aware of human rights violations in their supply chains yet remain silent. Those who know about exploitation and say nothing become part of the system.
The question that arises here is: Have you ever remained silent, knowing that your inaction was causing suffering?
2.2 Deontology: Must We Act Even When It Is Risky?
The philosopher Hannah Arendt coined the term the “banality of evil.” Her pointed assertion: Not only fanatical perpetrators bear guilt, but also the many who stand by idly. The Nuremberg Trials made clear that even following orders is no excuse when one knows they are participating in wrongdoing.
A historical example is civil servants under National Socialism. Many argued they had “only done their duty.” But the court ruled otherwise: Whoever knows that their actions constitute injustice has a duty to resist — even at personal risk.
The question here: Would you remain silent in a dictatorship to protect your life — or would you attempt to resist?
2.3 Virtue Ethics: What Does Silence Reveal About Our Character?
Virtue ethics directs attention to the person themselves. Willful ignorance reveals cowardice and irresponsibility. Passive pacifism becomes hypocrisy when it is not accompanied by active commitment to justice.
An example is Christian churches in the United States that should have spoken out against the instrumentalisation of faith by the MAGA movement. Their silence was not an act of faith but a moral failure.
Here too, a question for reflection: Could you imagine choosing to remain silent on principle — even if you knew your silence enabled injustice?
3. Why Tyranny Needs Fellow Travelers
Tyranny does not function through perpetrators alone. Above all, it relies on the many fellow travelers who look away or conform. The bureaucrats in the Nazi regime “only did their duty” and thereby stabilized the system. The same principle holds today: Those who remain silent in the face of war crimes or corruption become part of the problem.
Edmund Burke, “an Anglo-Irish writer, philosopher, and politician,” put it succinctly: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
4. Pacifism vs. Passivity: When Does Silence Become Complicity?
A common misunderstanding is equating pacifism with passivity. Active pacifism, as practiced by Gandhi or Martin Luther King, means peaceful resistance — protest, boycotts, civil disobedience. Passive pacifism, on the other hand, means silence born of convenience. That is not a virtue but complicity.
The question everyone should ask themselves: Have you ever remained silent because you feared the consequences? Or did you consciously adopt a stance — even an uncomfortable one?
5. What Can We Do Concretely?
Not everyone has to risk their life. But everyone can do something.
You can inform yourself and spread facts rather than passing along rumors. You can speak and break the silence — even when it is uncomfortable. You can act and support initiatives that advocate for justice. And you can reflect by asking: Would I want someone in my situation to remain silent if I were the one affected?
Small resistance is better than no resistance at all.
Conclusion: Responsibility Instead of Indifference
Silence is never neutral. It is a decision that either enables injustice, prolongs violence — or advances justice, if we actively engage.
Our task is to look rather than look away, to name injustice for what it is, and to act instead of remaining silent. Because justice does not arise on its own. It arises because people demand it.
Have you ever faced the choice between silence and action? Share your experiences in the comments.
Further Reading
If this topic interests you further, here are some in-depth perspectives:
“The Three Wise Monkeys — A Comprehensive Journey Through Symbolism, Cultural History, and Modern Relevance” offers a fascinating look at the cultural history of silence. Hannah Arendt’s “Eichmann in Jerusalem” elucidates the “banality of evil.” Edmund Burke’s “Reflections on the Revolution in France” contains the famous quote on responsibility. The Nuremberg Trials delivered the verdicts on the “following orders” defence. And Mahatma Gandhi as well as Martin Luther King stand for active pacifism as a form of resistance.
This article is part of a series on “Moral Responsibility in Uncertain Times.” Also read: “Civic Courage: How Do We Act When Silence Is Not an Option?“
-
🇬🇧Looking Away. Why Silence Is Not Neutral
Introduction: What Happens When We Say Nothing?
Three MonkeysIn a world rife with conflict, injustice, and human rights violations, a pressing question arises: Are we allowed to remain silent when wrongdoing occurs? The answer is more complicated than it first appears. Because silence is never neutral — it is always a choice with consequences.
This essay explores why deliberate looking away, indifference, and passive behaviour are not harmless attitudes. Often, they amount to tacit complicity in injustice. We connect philosophical ideas with historical examples and personal reflections. The goal is to show: silence can be a form of complicity.
1. What Do We Mean by “Silence”?
Before addressing the moral dimension, we need to clarify the different forms of silence.
The first form is willful ignorance. This means deliberately looking away to avoid accountability. An example would be an organisation that knows about human rights violations but remains silent for political reasons.
The second form is indifference. Here, any moral or emotional reaction to suffering is absent. For instance, when a citizen learns about corruption in their community but draws no consequences whatsoever.
The third form is pacifism — and here one must draw a distinction. There is active and passive pacifism. Active pacifism means peaceful resistance through protest, boycotts, or civil disobedience — as exemplified by Mahatma Gandhi or Martin Luther King. Passive pacifism, on the other hand, merely means avoiding violence without advocating for justice — and thereby permitting injustice.
Tacit approval arises when silence is understood as indirect endorsement of wrongdoing. And collaboration in this context means: one sustains an unjust system simply by tolerating it.
2. Why Is Silence Morally Problematic?
To grasp the moral dimension, it helps to consider three ethical perspectives.
2.1 Consequentialism: What Does My Silence Cause?
Consequentialism poses a highly practical question: What impact does my action — or indeed my inaction — have? If silence allows violence to continue or persist longer, it becomes co-responsibility.
One example is churches that remain silent during wartime atrocities. The Russian Orthodox Church should have condemned Putin’s war. Its silence indirectly lent support to the actions and undermined its own moral authority. The same applies to companies that are aware of human rights violations in their supply chains yet remain silent. Those who know about exploitation and say nothing become part of the system.
The question that arises here is: Have you ever remained silent, knowing that your inaction was causing suffering?
2.2 Deontology: Must We Act Even When It Is Risky?
The philosopher Hannah Arendt coined the term the “banality of evil.” Her pointed assertion: Not only fanatical perpetrators bear guilt, but also the many who stand by idly. The Nuremberg Trials made clear that even following orders is no excuse when one knows they are participating in wrongdoing.
A historical example is civil servants under National Socialism. Many argued they had “only done their duty.” But the court ruled otherwise: Whoever knows that their actions constitute injustice has a duty to resist — even at personal risk.
The question here: Would you remain silent in a dictatorship to protect your life — or would you attempt to resist?
2.3 Virtue Ethics: What Does Silence Reveal About Our Character?
Virtue ethics directs attention to the person themselves. Willful ignorance reveals cowardice and irresponsibility. Passive pacifism becomes hypocrisy when it is not accompanied by active commitment to justice.
An example is Christian churches in the United States that should have spoken out against the instrumentalisation of faith by the MAGA movement. Their silence was not an act of faith but a moral failure.
Here too, a question for reflection: Could you imagine choosing to remain silent on principle — even if you knew your silence enabled injustice?
3. Why Tyranny Needs Fellow Travelers
Tyranny does not function through perpetrators alone. Above all, it relies on the many fellow travelers who look away or conform. The bureaucrats in the Nazi regime “only did their duty” and thereby stabilized the system. The same principle holds today: Those who remain silent in the face of war crimes or corruption become part of the problem.
Edmund Burke, “an Anglo-Irish writer, philosopher, and politician,” put it succinctly: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
4. Pacifism vs. Passivity: When Does Silence Become Complicity?
A common misunderstanding is equating pacifism with passivity. Active pacifism, as practiced by Gandhi or Martin Luther King, means peaceful resistance — protest, boycotts, civil disobedience. Passive pacifism, on the other hand, means silence born of convenience. That is not a virtue but complicity.
The question everyone should ask themselves: Have you ever remained silent because you feared the consequences? Or did you consciously adopt a stance — even an uncomfortable one?
5. What Can We Do Concretely?
Not everyone has to risk their life. But everyone can do something.
You can inform yourself and spread facts rather than passing along rumors. You can speak and break the silence — even when it is uncomfortable. You can act and support initiatives that advocate for justice. And you can reflect by asking: Would I want someone in my situation to remain silent if I were the one affected?
Small resistance is better than no resistance at all.
Conclusion: Responsibility Instead of Indifference
Silence is never neutral. It is a decision that either enables injustice, prolongs violence — or advances justice, if we actively engage.
Our task is to look rather than look away, to name injustice for what it is, and to act instead of remaining silent. Because justice does not arise on its own. It arises because people demand it.
Have you ever faced the choice between silence and action? Share your experiences in the comments.
Further Reading
If this topic interests you further, here are some in-depth perspectives:
“The Three Wise Monkeys — A Comprehensive Journey Through Symbolism, Cultural History, and Modern Relevance” offers a fascinating look at the cultural history of silence. Hannah Arendt’s “Eichmann in Jerusalem” elucidates the “banality of evil.” Edmund Burke’s “Reflections on the Revolution in France” contains the famous quote on responsibility. The Nuremberg Trials delivered the verdicts on the “following orders” defence. And Mahatma Gandhi as well as Martin Luther King stand for active pacifism as a form of resistance.
This article is part of a series on “Moral Responsibility in Uncertain Times.” Also read: “Civic Courage: How Do We Act When Silence Is Not an Option?“
-
"if there is a hitlerian tyrant in office and these supposed liberal allies at turdway are trying to chop the anti fascist movements legs, what can you call them but collaborators? the time to pick a side is coming.”
#Third_Way #centrist_Democrats #collaborators #traitors
https://xcancel.com/hasanthehun/status/2085379858465689754#m
-
Panic Amongst the Collaborator Leaders
As the Cairo negotiations continue, one of the issues that has reportedly been settled is the presence of armed collaborator militias operating east of the “Yellow Line.” In light of leaked news that an agreement has been reached whereby the collaborator posts are to be dismantled and the militias disarmed, Ghassan al-Dahini and Shawqi Abu Nasira, the leaders of the self-styled “Popular Forces” and “Popular Army,” respectively, have taken to social media in recent days, pleading with US President Donald Trump and Egyptian officials to intervene to protect them and offer them amnesty. Seeking to issue a message of reassurance, al-Dahini has also taken to Facebook to insist that his Popular Forces will administer “New Gaza” as the “security component” of “the day after.”’ According to a new article by the resistance-aligned platform, “Pursuit of the Fifth Column,” there has been a “consensus reached in Cairo to disarm the militias in eastern Gaza and allow the entry of international forces and a technocratic committee,” prompting “these gangs into a cycle of betrayal and internal purges after they realized—too late—that they were merely pawns who had been used [by the occupation].”The report adds that internal sources had “revealed that a key provision was settled via unanimous agreement among all stakeholders—including the Palestinian factions, the Egyptian side, UN Coordinator Nikolay Miladinov, and the technocratic committee—mandating the immediate and comprehensive dismantling of the occupation’s proxy militia in eastern Gaza and its complete disarmament.”
Mujamma Haraket
Source: Mujamma X Account https://abolitionmedia.noblogs.org/?p=35641 #collaborators #gaza #hamas #palestine #resistance #westAsia -
Consorting with the enemy will get your head shaved....
-
Consorting with the enemy will get your head shaved....
-
Sunday, May 31, 2026
American military unit would lose to Ukrainian one says former US Marine who fought in Ukraine -- Authorities to introduce fuel vouchers, restrict gasoline sales in occupied Crimea amid shortages linked to Ukrainian strikes -- Estonia installed first stationery systems for detecting drones on Russian border -- Ukrainian military destroy two Russian Tu-142 naval aircraft, Iskander missile system on Black Sea coast ... and morehttps://activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026/05/sunday-may-31-2026/
-
Sunday, May 31, 2026
American military unit would lose to Ukrainian one says former US Marine who fought in Ukraine -- Authorities to introduce fuel vouchers, restrict gasoline sales in occupied Crimea amid shortages linked to Ukrainian strikes -- Estonia installed first stationery systems for detecting drones on Russian border -- Ukrainian military destroy two Russian Tu-142 naval aircraft, Iskander missile system on Black Sea coast ... and morehttps://activitypub.writeworks.uk/2026/05/sunday-may-31-2026/
-
#Estonia apprehended a record number of #russian #collaborators in 2025, the country’s Internal Security Service (KAPO) revealed
https://www.politico.eu/article/estonia-record-unmasked-russia-spies-kapo-report/
-
#Estonia apprehended a record number of #russian #collaborators in 2025, the country’s Internal Security Service (KAPO) revealed
https://www.politico.eu/article/estonia-record-unmasked-russia-spies-kapo-report/
-
@washingtonpost Irony is as dead as your paper. #MSMisDead Jim, it's dead. #Collaborators #Lies
-
@washingtonpost Irony is as dead as your paper. #MSMisDead Jim, it's dead. #Collaborators #Lies
-
Mark Ashton & Luke Werhun are fools, unreliable fools.
Or worse.They have to go.
Ipswich Town Football Club.#MarkAshton #LukeWerhun #NigelFarage #Collaborators #Ipswich #IpswichTownFC
-
Mark Ashton & Luke Werhun are fools, unreliable fools.
Or worse.They have to go.
Ipswich Town Football Club.#MarkAshton #LukeWerhun #NigelFarage #Collaborators #Ipswich #IpswichTownFC
-
@matthewfacciani
"The sole academic researcher is John Martinis, a quantum physicist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who shared the Nobel Prize in Physics last year for observations of macroscopic quantum phenomena. “I am honoured to be on the committee,” Martinis told Nature." SciAm March 27, 2026.Wondering if Martinis feels as honoured to be on Trump's science committee as William Barr felt to be Trump's attorney general?
-
@matthewfacciani
"The sole academic researcher is John Martinis, a quantum physicist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who shared the Nobel Prize in Physics last year for observations of macroscopic quantum phenomena. “I am honoured to be on the committee,” Martinis told Nature." SciAm March 27, 2026.Wondering if Martinis feels as honoured to be on Trump's science committee as William Barr felt to be Trump's attorney general?
-
A little whoopsie, a little accidental Nazi collaboration
-
A little whoopsie, a little accidental Nazi collaboration
-
“Look at my opposition party dawg. They know doing a regime change in Iran for Israel is polling at 45% overall opposition (-66 D) and they're STILL trying to manufacture consent when Trump doesn’t even care to!”
-
“Look at my opposition party dawg. They know doing a regime change in Iran for Israel is polling at 45% overall opposition (-66 D) and they're STILL trying to manufacture consent when Trump doesn’t even care to!”
-
“Every dem that responds like this to the illegal, deadly immoral failure that was operation "epic chungus" is compromised by corporate interest & zionism.”
"Replace them. This is a litmus test. No more costly & deadly regime change wars for pedophilic capital! Real opposition now!”
https://xcancel.com/hasanthehun/status/2028173709056602118#m
-
#Billwhite is the turd on the Belgian pavement. Important now is to see who stepped in it and follow all the trails. #fucktrump #collaborators
-
#Billwhite is the turd on the Belgian pavement. Important now is to see who stepped in it and follow all the trails. #fucktrump #collaborators
-
Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow – No trackers, no ads. Black type, white background. Privacy policy: we don't collect or retain any data at all ever period. [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·Pluralistic: Doctors' union may yet save the NHS from Palantir (12 Feb 2026)
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://pluralistic.net/2026/02/12/palantir-is-ice/
-
Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow – No trackers, no ads. Black type, white background. Privacy policy: we don't collect or retain any data at all ever period. [Unofficial] @[email protected] ·Pluralistic: Doctors' union may yet save the NHS from Palantir (12 Feb 2026)
https://web.brid.gy/r/https://pluralistic.net/2026/02/12/palantir-is-ice/
-
Making sure the Trump stink never comes off any Republican ever, is going to be our task for the next generation or three.
-
Making sure the Trump stink never comes off any Republican ever, is going to be our task for the next generation or three.
-
Zuckerberg cracking down on the *ICE List* over on Threads. Another billionaire supporting Trump’s fascist takeover and protecting his thugs.
Crust News posted:
“Threads will no longer allow users to open the ICE List link in our profile.We do not record user information, the only content on the ICE List website is ICE agent identities and records of their crimes.
Fuck Meta and ICE.”
Verified this myself.
( wiki.icelist.is )
#ice #usa #meta #Zuckerberg #censorship #dictatorship #fascism #collaborators -
What's that cold front coming in?
The collected sighs of relief from the coldhearted #Democrats that only seven were needed to break the tie
-
What's that cold front coming in?
The collected sighs of relief from the coldhearted #Democrats that only seven were needed to break the tie
-
Which #Democratic #Senators are #NAZI #collaborators? Take note, #vote and #donate accordingly.
-
Which #Democratic #Senators are #NAZI #collaborators? Take note, #vote and #donate accordingly.
-
CBS = Collaborationist Broadcasting System
And yes, they really do sell this red hat on the CBS part of the online Paramount Shop. If you squint, it's hard to tell the difference from a regular MAGA hat.
#cbsnews #60Minutes #CBS #collaborators #obeyinginadvance #BariWeiss
-
“Dozens of Israeli #Collaborators Surrender to Hamas after Chief #AbuShabab’s #Assassination”
by Palestine Chronicle Staff
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@[email protected]
@uk_politics
@BBC5Live
@BBCRadio4
@BBCNews
@UKLabour“Dozens of armed operatives belonging to militia gangs, notorious for their collaboration with the Israeli occupation, have begun voluntarily surrendering to #Hamas security agencies across the #Gaza Strip”
-
Have a treat today guys 😊🔻
-
Have a treat today guys 😊🔻
-
*They didn't say *willing* collaborators. Just, you know, a website page that lists "the collaborators." #collaborators
