home.social

#clientsidescanning — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #clientsidescanning, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Auch wenn der Artikel selbst recht schwach ist: Es lohnt sich schon mal nachzulesen. was die Russen an #Überwachung schon alles mit ihrer App #MAX können und was offenbar von EU, UK und Kanada ja auch angestrebt wird. ( z.B. #Chatkontrolle, #ClientSideScanning )

    heise.de/hintergrund/Digitaler

    Für technische Details schaut man eher in den (bei Heise verlinkten) Original-Artikel:
    arxiv.org/html/2609.11814v1

  2. Auch wenn der Artikel selbst recht schwach ist: Es lohnt sich schon mal nachzulesen. was die Russen an #Überwachung schon alles mit ihrer App #MAX können und was offenbar von EU, UK und Kanada ja auch angestrebt wird. ( z.B. #Chatkontrolle, #ClientSideScanning )

    heise.de/hintergrund/Digitaler

    Für technische Details schaut man eher in den (bei Heise verlinkten) Original-Artikel:
    arxiv.org/html/2609.11814v1

  3. Auch wenn der Artikel selbst recht schwach ist: Es lohnt sich schon mal nachzulesen. was die Russen an #Überwachung schon alles mit ihrer App #MAX können und was offenbar von EU, UK und Kanada ja auch angestrebt wird. ( z.B. #Chatkontrolle, #ClientSideScanning )

    heise.de/hintergrund/Digitaler

    Für technische Details schaut man eher in den (bei Heise verlinkten) Original-Artikel:
    arxiv.org/html/2609.11814v1

  4. This bill would force online services to personally get approval from the EU Commission before pushing any updates "that might effect children" (translation: all of them).

    This bill would also make jail-breaking and installing alternate mobile operating systems (ex: GrapheneOS) effectively illegal.

    The EU Commission has gone completely mask off (notably Ursula, the EU Commission President and a certain Danish leader). They've been completely captured by the interests of Big Tech, AAA gaming publishers, Christo-Fascist groups, and Pro-Israel lobbyists.

    We should've seen Ursula and a certain Danish leader using underhanded tactics to get CC 1.0 through as a sign of things to come. Both are completely compromised.

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  5. This bill would force online services to personally get approval from the EU Commission before pushing any updates "that might effect children" (translation: all of them).

    This bill would also make jail-breaking and installing alternate mobile operating systems (ex: GrapheneOS) effectively illegal.

    The EU Commission has gone completely mask off (notably Ursula, the EU Commission President and a certain Danish leader). They've been completely captured by the interests of Big Tech, AAA gaming publishers, Christo-Fascist groups, and Pro-Israel lobbyists.

    We should've seen Ursula and a certain Danish leader using underhanded tactics to get CC 1.0 through as a sign of things to come. Both are completely compromised.

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  6. This bill would force online services to personally get approval from the EU Commission before pushing any updates "that might effect children" (translation: all of them).

    This bill would also make jail-breaking and installing alternate mobile operating systems (ex: GrapheneOS) effectively illegal.

    The EU Commission has gone completely mask off (notably Ursula, the EU Commission President and a certain Danish leader). They've been completely captured by the interests of Big Tech, AAA gaming publishers, Christo-Fascist groups, and Pro-Israel lobbyists.

    We should've seen Ursula and a certain Danish leader using underhanded tactics to get CC 1.0 through as a sign of things to come. Both are completely compromised.

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  7. This bill would force online services to personally get approval from the EU Commission before pushing any updates "that might effect children" (translation: all of them).

    This bill would also make jail-breaking and installing alternate mobile operating systems (ex: GrapheneOS) effectively illegal.

    The EU Commission has gone completely mask off (notably Ursula, the EU Commission President and a certain Danish leader). They've been completely captured by the interests of Big Tech, AAA gaming publishers, Christo-Fascist groups, and Pro-Israel lobbyists.

    We should've seen Ursula and a certain Danish leader using underhanded tactics to get CC 1.0 through as a sign of things to come. Both are completely compromised.

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  8. This bill would force online services to personally get approval from the EU Commission before pushing any updates "that might effect children" (translation: all of them).

    This bill would also make jail-breaking and installing alternate mobile operating systems (ex: GrapheneOS) effectively illegal.

    The EU Commission has gone completely mask off (notably Ursula, the EU Commission President and a certain Danish leader). They've been completely captured by the interests of Big Tech, AAA gaming publishers, Christo-Fascist groups, and Pro-Israel lobbyists.

    We should've seen Ursula and a certain Danish leader using underhanded tactics to get CC 1.0 through as a sign of things to come. Both are completely compromised.

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  9. Europeans/EU Residents!

    The European Commission has proposed an incredibly draconian piece of legislation: The EU Kids Act. Leaked drafts have revealed that this bill is closely modeled after the UK's Online Safety Act.

    Among many other horrible things, some provisions feel like a direct retaliation against the Stop Killing Games movement. Said provisions would require game devs to collect vast amounts of data on consumers to "verify age" among other things.

    Due to these mandated requirements, community servers and game preservation as a whole would be rendered effectively illegal.

    This is in addition to Chat Control 2.0! Of which Parliament's debate regarding that bill will resume soon! Please mail/call your MEPs/relevant reps!

    Sign this initiative: stopkillingtheinternet.com/

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  10. Europeans/EU Residents!

    The European Commission has proposed an incredibly draconian piece of legislation: The EU Kids Act. Leaked drafts have revealed that this bill is closely modeled after the UK's Online Safety Act.

    Among many other horrible things, some provisions feel like a direct retaliation against the Stop Killing Games movement. Said provisions would require game devs to collect vast amounts of data on consumers to "verify age" among other things.

    Due to these mandated requirements, community servers and game preservation as a whole would be rendered effectively illegal.

    This is in addition to Chat Control 2.0! Of which Parliament's debate regarding that bill will resume soon! Please mail/call your MEPs/relevant reps!

    Sign this initiative: stopkillingtheinternet.com/

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  11. Europeans/EU Residents!

    The European Commission has proposed an incredibly draconian piece of legislation: The EU Kids Act. Leaked drafts have revealed that this bill is closely modeled after the UK's Online Safety Act.

    Among many other horrible things, some provisions feel like a direct retaliation against the Stop Killing Games movement. Said provisions would require game devs to collect vast amounts of data on consumers to "verify age" among other things.

    Due to these mandated requirements, community servers and game preservation as a whole would be rendered effectively illegal.

    This is in addition to Chat Control 2.0! Of which Parliament's debate regarding that bill will resume soon! Please mail/call your MEPs/relevant reps!

    Sign this initiative: stopkillingtheinternet.com/

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  12. Europeans/EU Residents!

    The European Commission has proposed an incredibly draconian piece of legislation: The EU Kids Act. Leaked drafts have revealed that this bill is closely modeled after the UK's Online Safety Act.

    Among many other horrible things, some provisions feel like a direct retaliation against the Stop Killing Games movement. Said provisions would require game devs to collect vast amounts of data on consumers to "verify age" among other things.

    Due to these mandated requirements, community servers and game preservation as a whole would be rendered effectively illegal.

    This is in addition to Chat Control 2.0! Of which Parliament's debate regarding that bill will resume soon! Please mail/call your MEPs/relevant reps!

    Sign this initiative: stopkillingtheinternet.com/

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  13. Europeans/EU Residents!

    The European Commission has proposed an incredibly draconian piece of legislation: The EU Kids Act. Leaked drafts have revealed that this bill is closely modeled after the UK's Online Safety Act.

    Among many other horrible things, some provisions feel like a direct retaliation against the Stop Killing Games movement. Said provisions would require game devs to collect vast amounts of data on consumers to "verify age" among other things.

    Due to these mandated requirements, community servers and game preservation as a whole would be rendered effectively illegal.

    This is in addition to Chat Control 2.0! Of which Parliament's debate regarding that bill will resume soon! Please mail/call your MEPs/relevant reps!

    Sign this initiative: stopkillingtheinternet.com/

    #EUKidsAct #ChatControl #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #EU #EuropeanUnion

  14. Bruxelles-ul a descoperit rețeta perfectă: dacă vrei să controlezi tot, spune că o faci pentru binele copiilor Europa vrea să transforme telefonul fiecărui cetățean într-un mic terminal de supraveghere 👉 c.aparatorul.md/8tdhh 👈 #algoritmul #aplicațiiledemesagerie #ChatControl #ChatControl #clientsidescanning #controlsocial #controlezi #criptate #DrepturiDigitale #Europa #supraveghere #SupraveghereaTotală #UE
    c.aparatorul.md/8tdhh

  15. Americans!

    Updates on "Internet Safety" bills:

    -Hawley and Durbin are trying to sneak the unconstitutional STOP CSAM Act into the FY27 NDAA. Hawley allegedly managed to get it included it in the manager's amendment. This means it has a higher chance than previous attempts at being successful.
    -Still, there's procedural roadblocks that the bill has to clear to survive until the final passage. The manager's amendment is reserved for uncontroversial amendments.
    -The Senate Commerce Committee has scheduled a markup for KOSA and the SCREEN Act for Wednesday, August 5th. There are other bills, but they're far less problematic than KOSA and the SCREEN Act.
    -Senate KOSA's fate in the House is still quite uncertain. The same goes for the KIDS Act's fate in the Senate.
    -The SCREEN Act's approval among Democrats is unknown at the moment.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #Section230 #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #US #UnitedStates

  16. Americans!

    Updates on "Internet Safety" bills:

    -Hawley and Durbin are trying to sneak the unconstitutional STOP CSAM Act into the FY27 NDAA. Hawley allegedly managed to get it included it in the manager's amendment. This means it has a higher chance than previous attempts at being successful.
    -Still, there's procedural roadblocks that the bill has to clear to survive until the final passage. The manager's amendment is reserved for uncontroversial amendments.
    -The Senate Commerce Committee has scheduled a markup for KOSA and the SCREEN Act for Wednesday, August 5th. There are other bills, but they're far less problematic than KOSA and the SCREEN Act.
    -Senate KOSA's fate in the House is still quite uncertain. The same goes for the KIDS Act's fate in the Senate.
    -The SCREEN Act's approval among Democrats is unknown at the moment.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #Section230 #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #US #UnitedStates

  17. Americans!

    Updates on "Internet Safety" bills:

    -Hawley and Durbin are trying to sneak the unconstitutional STOP CSAM Act into the FY27 NDAA. Hawley allegedly managed to get it included it in the manager's amendment. This means it has a higher chance than previous attempts at being successful.
    -Still, there's procedural roadblocks that the bill has to clear to survive until the final passage. The manager's amendment is reserved for uncontroversial amendments.
    -The Senate Commerce Committee has scheduled a markup for KOSA and the SCREEN Act for Wednesday, August 5th. There are other bills, but they're far less problematic than KOSA and the SCREEN Act.
    -Senate KOSA's fate in the House is still quite uncertain. The same goes for the KIDS Act's fate in the Senate.
    -The SCREEN Act's approval among Democrats is unknown at the moment.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #Section230 #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #US #UnitedStates

  18. Americans!

    Updates on "Internet Safety" bills:

    -Hawley and Durbin are trying to sneak the unconstitutional STOP CSAM Act into the FY27 NDAA. Hawley allegedly managed to get it included it in the manager's amendment. This means it has a higher chance than previous attempts at being successful.
    -Still, there's procedural roadblocks that the bill has to clear to survive until the final passage. The manager's amendment is reserved for uncontroversial amendments.
    -The Senate Commerce Committee has scheduled a markup for KOSA and the SCREEN Act for Wednesday, August 5th. There are other bills, but they're far less problematic than KOSA and the SCREEN Act.
    -Senate KOSA's fate in the House is still quite uncertain. The same goes for the KIDS Act's fate in the Senate.
    -The SCREEN Act's approval among Democrats is unknown at the moment.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #Section230 #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #US #UnitedStates

  19. Americans!

    Updates on "Internet Safety" bills:

    -Hawley and Durbin are trying to sneak the unconstitutional STOP CSAM Act into the FY27 NDAA. Hawley allegedly managed to get it included it in the manager's amendment. This means it has a higher chance than previous attempts at being successful.
    -Still, there's procedural roadblocks that the bill has to clear to survive until the final passage. The manager's amendment is reserved for uncontroversial amendments.
    -The Senate Commerce Committee has scheduled a markup for KOSA and the SCREEN Act for Wednesday, August 5th. There are other bills, but they're far less problematic than KOSA and the SCREEN Act.
    -Senate KOSA's fate in the House is still quite uncertain. The same goes for the KIDS Act's fate in the Senate.
    -The SCREEN Act's approval among Democrats is unknown at the moment.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #Censorship #DigitalRights #FreeSpeech #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #Section230 #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #US #UnitedStates

  20. In unkritischen Medienberichten - wie teilweise auch in dem verlinkten Zeit-Artikel - wird immer wieder gezielt das manipulative Narrativ des "Kinderschutzes" und "Kampf gegen Missbrauch" verbreitet, um die Chatkontrolle zu propagieren. Dabei warnen nicht nur Datenschützer*innen und Netzaktivisti sondern auch Kinderschutz-Organisationen vor der Chatkontrolle, die mit der angestrebten Massenüberwachung auch Kinder und Jugendliche gefährdet.

    zeit.de/news/2026-07/09/chatko

    archive.is/ULUjx

    #Chatkontrolle #Überwachung #Datenschutz #EU #Privacy #ClientSideScanning

  21. In unkritischen Medienberichten - wie teilweise auch in dem verlinkten Zeit-Artikel - wird immer wieder gezielt das manipulative Narrativ des "Kinderschutzes" und "Kampf gegen Missbrauch" verbreitet, um die Chatkontrolle zu propagieren. Dabei warnen nicht nur Datenschützer*innen und Netzaktivisti sondern auch Kinderschutz-Organisationen vor der Chatkontrolle, die mit der angestrebten Massenüberwachung auch Kinder und Jugendliche gefährdet.

    zeit.de/news/2026-07/09/chatko

    archive.is/ULUjx

    #Chatkontrolle #Überwachung #Datenschutz #EU #Privacy #ClientSideScanning

  22. In unkritischen Medienberichten - wie teilweise auch in dem verlinkten Zeit-Artikel - wird immer wieder gezielt das manipulative Narrativ des "Kinderschutzes" und "Kampf gegen Missbrauch" verbreitet, um die Chatkontrolle zu propagieren. Dabei warnen nicht nur Datenschützer*innen und Netzaktivisti sondern auch Kinderschutz-Organisationen vor der Chatkontrolle, die mit der angestrebten Massenüberwachung auch Kinder und Jugendliche gefährdet.

    zeit.de/news/2026-07/09/chatko

    archive.is/ULUjx

    #Chatkontrolle #Überwachung #Datenschutz #EU #Privacy #ClientSideScanning

  23. In unkritischen Medienberichten - wie teilweise auch in dem verlinkten Zeit-Artikel - wird immer wieder gezielt das manipulative Narrativ des "Kinderschutzes" und "Kampf gegen Missbrauch" verbreitet, um die Chatkontrolle zu propagieren. Dabei warnen nicht nur Datenschützer*innen und Netzaktivisti sondern auch Kinderschutz-Organisationen vor der Chatkontrolle, die mit der angestrebten Massenüberwachung auch Kinder und Jugendliche gefährdet.

    zeit.de/news/2026-07/09/chatko

    archive.is/ULUjx

    #Chatkontrolle #Überwachung #Datenschutz #EU #Privacy #ClientSideScanning

  24. In unkritischen Medienberichten - wie teilweise auch in dem verlinkten Zeit-Artikel - wird immer wieder gezielt das manipulative Narrativ des "Kinderschutzes" und "Kampf gegen Missbrauch" verbreitet, um die Chatkontrolle zu propagieren. Dabei warnen nicht nur Datenschützer*innen und Netzaktivisti sondern auch Kinderschutz-Organisationen vor der Chatkontrolle, die mit der angestrebten Massenüberwachung auch Kinder und Jugendliche gefährdet.

    zeit.de/news/2026-07/09/chatko

    archive.is/ULUjx

    #Chatkontrolle #Überwachung #Datenschutz #EU #Privacy #ClientSideScanning

  25. >KIDS Act passed the House
    I had a feeling that KIDS Act (H.R.7757) was going to pass in the House since House GOP made a deal with House Dems to get it to the floor. That being said, the bill's fate in the Senate is uncertain at best. This is due to the fact that the Senate and House's versions of KOSA heavily differ.

    Here are the sources of contention:
    -KIDS Act: The Senate refuses to pass this bill in its current state due to the House removing the "Duty of Care" provisions from the included version of KOSA.
    -KOSA (Senate): The House refuses to pass this bill in its current state due to House GOP's concerns regarding free speech and giving the FTC that much power.

    So what will happen? I see one of two scenarios happening:
    1: The bills pass but in heavily altered/amended forms. The differences are simply too great for either bill to pass as they are currently written.

    2: The bills stall because the Senate and House cannot reconcile the differences in the remaining time the 119th Congress has.

    That being said, it'd be morbidly funny if these bills stall because they weren't shitty enough.

    #Privacy #FreeSpeech #Censorship #DigitalRights #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #Encryption #KOSA #Internet #SocialMedia #US #UnitedStates

  26. I really do want that Hallmark movie moment. I want us to be able to successfully push back against all the mass surveillance and censorship legislation (Age Verification, Client Side Scanning, OSA-copycat bills, under 15/16 social media bans, making copyright law more draconian, etc.). But those chances are looking extremely slim at best (I mean they're forcing Chat Control through via underhanded tactics!).

    At this point, we have to hope that the laws will be struck down in court (which could take years/decades). But if US courts refusing to strike down SESTA-FOSTA and the current makeup of SCOTUS are any indication, this also has an incredibly slim chance of being successful. The courts will shit out some incredibly contrived reason why these laws are fine actually.

    We just have to accept the possibility that the free and open internet is on the verge of death.

    P.S. Multiple reports have confirmed that policies like Age Verification and Under 15/16 bans are ineffective at best at protecting women and minors. Keep this in mind.

    #Privacy #FreeSpeech #Censorship #ChatControl #DigitalRights #AgeVerification #ClientSideScanning #Encryption #Under16Ban #Under15Ban #UnitedStates #Canada #UnitedKingdom #EuropeanUnion #Australia

  27. RE: ieji.de/@GalacticGoddess/11680

    Update: It also looks like members of the Senate are trying to put together their own packages as well:

    -One package is being constructed as a counter to the House's KIDS Act and as a potential handout to big tech regarding GenAI regulation. Some of the bills that could be included are the Senate version of KOSA, the App Store Accountability Act, and the NO FAKES Act. That being said, the final form of this package is in flux at the time of writing this.

    -Another is Hawley and Durbin trying to slip the DEFIANCE Act and STOP CSAM Act into a must pass bill (NDAA). They've tried this several times before but failed. Still it has a possibility of succeeding.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #FreeSpeech #DigitalRights #Censorship #AgeVerification #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #ClientSideScanning #Encryption #UnitedStates #USA

  28. RE: ieji.de/@GalacticGoddess/11680

    Update: It also looks like members of the Senate are trying to put together their own packages as well:

    -One package would bundle Senate KOSA, the NO FAKES Act, and the App Store Accountability Act together in a compromise with big tech regarding GenAI regulation

    -Another is Hawley and Durbin trying to slip the DEFIANCE Act and STOP CSAM Act into a must pass bill (NDAA). They've tried this several times before but failed. Still it has a possibility of succeeding.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #FreeSpeech #DigitalRights #Censorship #AgeVerification #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #ClientSideScanning #Encryption #UnitedStates #USA

  29. RE: ieji.de/@GalacticGoddess/11680

    Update: It also looks like members of the Senate are trying to put together their own packages as well:

    -One package would bundle Senate KOSA, the NO FAKES Act, and the App Store Accountability Act together in a compromise with big tech regarding GenAI regulation

    -Another is Hawley and Durbin trying to slip the DEFIANCE Act and STOP CSAM Act into a must pass bill (NDAA). They've tried this several times before but failed. Still it has a possibility of succeeding.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #FreeSpeech #DigitalRights #Censorship #AgeVerification #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #ClientSideScanning #Encryption #UnitedStates #USA

  30. RE: ieji.de/@GalacticGoddess/11680

    Update: It also looks like members of the Senate are trying to put together their own packages as well:

    -One package is being constructed as a counter to the House's KIDS Act and as a potential handout to big tech regarding GenAI regulation. Some of the bills that could be included are the Senate version of KOSA, the App Store Accountability Act, and the NO FAKES Act. That being said, the final form of this package is in flux at the time of writing this.

    -Another is Hawley and Durbin trying to slip the DEFIANCE Act and STOP CSAM Act into a must pass bill (NDAA). They've tried this several times before but failed. Still it has a possibility of succeeding.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #FreeSpeech #DigitalRights #Censorship #AgeVerification #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #ClientSideScanning #Encryption #UnitedStates #USA

  31. RE: ieji.de/@GalacticGoddess/11680

    Update: It also looks like members of the Senate are trying to put together their own packages as well:

    -One package would bundle Senate KOSA, the NO FAKES Act, and the App Store Accountability Act together in a compromise with big tech regarding GenAI regulation

    -Another is Hawley and Durbin trying to slip the DEFIANCE Act and STOP CSAM Act into a must pass bill (NDAA). They've tried this several times before but failed. Still it has a possibility of succeeding.

    Call your Senators and Representatives ASAP!

    #Privacy #FreeSpeech #DigitalRights #Censorship #AgeVerification #KOSA #KidsOnlineSafetyAct #ClientSideScanning #Encryption #UnitedStates #USA

  32. Signal llama «vigilancia masiva» al plan del Reino Unido de escanear dispositivos

    El primer ministro Keir Starmer anunció en la London Tech Week que Apple y Google deberán activar herramientas para detectar imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores. Signal respondió con un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», advirtiendo que el sistema sentaría las bases para el control estatal sobre cualquier contenido privado (Fuente Signal).

    El gobierno del Reino Unido quiere que cada teléfono y tablet se convierta en un punto de control de imágenes. Signal dice que eso es exactamente el problema. La propuesta de escaneo de dispositivos fue anunciada por el primer ministro Keir Starmer durante la London Tech Week. Bajo el plan, compañías como Apple y Google deberían activar funciones integradas en smartphones y tablets para detectar y bloquear imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores.

    El alcance de lo que se pide es amplio. El gobierno quiere que las protecciones se apliquen en todo el dispositivo, incluyendo cámaras, aplicaciones de terceros, funciones de búsqueda y servicios de mensajería. Los adultos podrían seguir viendo o compartiendo contenido para adultos, pero solo después de pasar una verificación de edad. Si las empresas tecnológicas no actúan en un plazo de tres meses, el gobierno dice que impulsará una legislación con multas para las compañías y posible responsabilidad penal para sus ejecutivos.

    Apple ya tiene algo similar en funcionamiento. La compañía ofrece su función Communication Safety, que usa aprendizaje automático en el propio dispositivo para detectar fotos y videos de desnudos, difuminar el contenido y advertir a los menores antes de que lo vean o envíen. Apple recientemente presentó herramientas ampliadas de seguridad infantil en la WWDC26, aunque la propuesta del Reino Unido va más lejos al hacer el enfoque obligatorio y extenderlo más allá del ecosistema de Apple.

    La respuesta de Signal fue contundente. En un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», la app de mensajería cifrada señaló que obligar a los residentes del Reino Unido a probar su edad o tener su contenido escaneado simplemente para comunicarse es una propuesta peligrosa. Aunque el escaneo ocurra en el dispositivo, Signal argumenta que el sistema normalizaría la inspección de contenido privado antes de que pueda enviarse o verse.

    El argumento central de los críticos no es técnico, sino político. «Sabemos que las capacidades de vigilancia masiva y censura, por más sinceras que suenen las promesas de quienes las inician, nunca permanecen acotadas de forma estrecha», escribió Signal. Una vez que los teléfonos estén obligados a inspeccionar contenido para una categoría de material, el mismo sistema puede expandirse a lo que los gobiernos consideren amenazas o contenido dañino.

    Signal también advirtió que el sistema fortalecería el control que Apple, Google y Microsoft ya tienen sobre la información más personal de los usuarios, y sostuvo que la verdadera seguridad infantil debería significar mejor educación financiada, servicios sociales más sólidos y salvaguardas reales en plataformas de IA, no escaneo predeterminado en cada dispositivo.

    No es la primera vez que el Reino Unido choca con las grandes plataformas de mensajería cifrada. WhatsApp y Signal habían dicho anteriormente que preferirían abandonar el país antes que debilitar el cifrado bajo la Online Safety Bill. Más recientemente, las reglas de verificación de edad de la Online Safety Act impulsaron un aumento en el uso de VPNs.

    #APPLE #ciberseguridad #cifrado #clientsidescanning #encriptacion #google #KeirStarmer #mensajeria #OnlineSafetyAct #PORTADA #privacidad #ReinoUnido #SeguridadInfantil #signal #Vigilancia
  33. Signal llama «vigilancia masiva» al plan del Reino Unido de escanear dispositivos

    El primer ministro Keir Starmer anunció en la London Tech Week que Apple y Google deberán activar herramientas para detectar imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores. Signal respondió con un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», advirtiendo que el sistema sentaría las bases para el control estatal sobre cualquier contenido privado (Fuente Signal).

    El gobierno del Reino Unido quiere que cada teléfono y tablet se convierta en un punto de control de imágenes. Signal dice que eso es exactamente el problema. La propuesta de escaneo de dispositivos fue anunciada por el primer ministro Keir Starmer durante la London Tech Week. Bajo el plan, compañías como Apple y Google deberían activar funciones integradas en smartphones y tablets para detectar y bloquear imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores.

    El alcance de lo que se pide es amplio. El gobierno quiere que las protecciones se apliquen en todo el dispositivo, incluyendo cámaras, aplicaciones de terceros, funciones de búsqueda y servicios de mensajería. Los adultos podrían seguir viendo o compartiendo contenido para adultos, pero solo después de pasar una verificación de edad. Si las empresas tecnológicas no actúan en un plazo de tres meses, el gobierno dice que impulsará una legislación con multas para las compañías y posible responsabilidad penal para sus ejecutivos.

    Apple ya tiene algo similar en funcionamiento. La compañía ofrece su función Communication Safety, que usa aprendizaje automático en el propio dispositivo para detectar fotos y videos de desnudos, difuminar el contenido y advertir a los menores antes de que lo vean o envíen. Apple recientemente presentó herramientas ampliadas de seguridad infantil en la WWDC26, aunque la propuesta del Reino Unido va más lejos al hacer el enfoque obligatorio y extenderlo más allá del ecosistema de Apple.

    La respuesta de Signal fue contundente. En un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», la app de mensajería cifrada señaló que obligar a los residentes del Reino Unido a probar su edad o tener su contenido escaneado simplemente para comunicarse es una propuesta peligrosa. Aunque el escaneo ocurra en el dispositivo, Signal argumenta que el sistema normalizaría la inspección de contenido privado antes de que pueda enviarse o verse.

    El argumento central de los críticos no es técnico, sino político. «Sabemos que las capacidades de vigilancia masiva y censura, por más sinceras que suenen las promesas de quienes las inician, nunca permanecen acotadas de forma estrecha», escribió Signal. Una vez que los teléfonos estén obligados a inspeccionar contenido para una categoría de material, el mismo sistema puede expandirse a lo que los gobiernos consideren amenazas o contenido dañino.

    Signal también advirtió que el sistema fortalecería el control que Apple, Google y Microsoft ya tienen sobre la información más personal de los usuarios, y sostuvo que la verdadera seguridad infantil debería significar mejor educación financiada, servicios sociales más sólidos y salvaguardas reales en plataformas de IA, no escaneo predeterminado en cada dispositivo.

    No es la primera vez que el Reino Unido choca con las grandes plataformas de mensajería cifrada. WhatsApp y Signal habían dicho anteriormente que preferirían abandonar el país antes que debilitar el cifrado bajo la Online Safety Bill. Más recientemente, las reglas de verificación de edad de la Online Safety Act impulsaron un aumento en el uso de VPNs.

    #APPLE #ciberseguridad #cifrado #clientsidescanning #encriptacion #google #KeirStarmer #mensajeria #OnlineSafetyAct #PORTADA #privacidad #ReinoUnido #SeguridadInfantil #signal #Vigilancia
  34. Signal llama «vigilancia masiva» al plan del Reino Unido de escanear dispositivos

    El primer ministro Keir Starmer anunció en la London Tech Week que Apple y Google deberán activar herramientas para detectar imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores. Signal respondió con un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», advirtiendo que el sistema sentaría las bases para el control estatal sobre cualquier contenido privado (Fuente Signal).

    El gobierno del Reino Unido quiere que cada teléfono y tablet se convierta en un punto de control de imágenes. Signal dice que eso es exactamente el problema. La propuesta de escaneo de dispositivos fue anunciada por el primer ministro Keir Starmer durante la London Tech Week. Bajo el plan, compañías como Apple y Google deberían activar funciones integradas en smartphones y tablets para detectar y bloquear imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores.

    El alcance de lo que se pide es amplio. El gobierno quiere que las protecciones se apliquen en todo el dispositivo, incluyendo cámaras, aplicaciones de terceros, funciones de búsqueda y servicios de mensajería. Los adultos podrían seguir viendo o compartiendo contenido para adultos, pero solo después de pasar una verificación de edad. Si las empresas tecnológicas no actúan en un plazo de tres meses, el gobierno dice que impulsará una legislación con multas para las compañías y posible responsabilidad penal para sus ejecutivos.

    Apple ya tiene algo similar en funcionamiento. La compañía ofrece su función Communication Safety, que usa aprendizaje automático en el propio dispositivo para detectar fotos y videos de desnudos, difuminar el contenido y advertir a los menores antes de que lo vean o envíen. Apple recientemente presentó herramientas ampliadas de seguridad infantil en la WWDC26, aunque la propuesta del Reino Unido va más lejos al hacer el enfoque obligatorio y extenderlo más allá del ecosistema de Apple.

    La respuesta de Signal fue contundente. En un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», la app de mensajería cifrada señaló que obligar a los residentes del Reino Unido a probar su edad o tener su contenido escaneado simplemente para comunicarse es una propuesta peligrosa. Aunque el escaneo ocurra en el dispositivo, Signal argumenta que el sistema normalizaría la inspección de contenido privado antes de que pueda enviarse o verse.

    El argumento central de los críticos no es técnico, sino político. «Sabemos que las capacidades de vigilancia masiva y censura, por más sinceras que suenen las promesas de quienes las inician, nunca permanecen acotadas de forma estrecha», escribió Signal. Una vez que los teléfonos estén obligados a inspeccionar contenido para una categoría de material, el mismo sistema puede expandirse a lo que los gobiernos consideren amenazas o contenido dañino.

    Signal también advirtió que el sistema fortalecería el control que Apple, Google y Microsoft ya tienen sobre la información más personal de los usuarios, y sostuvo que la verdadera seguridad infantil debería significar mejor educación financiada, servicios sociales más sólidos y salvaguardas reales en plataformas de IA, no escaneo predeterminado en cada dispositivo.

    No es la primera vez que el Reino Unido choca con las grandes plataformas de mensajería cifrada. WhatsApp y Signal habían dicho anteriormente que preferirían abandonar el país antes que debilitar el cifrado bajo la Online Safety Bill. Más recientemente, las reglas de verificación de edad de la Online Safety Act impulsaron un aumento en el uso de VPNs.

    #APPLE #ciberseguridad #cifrado #clientsidescanning #encriptacion #google #KeirStarmer #mensajeria #OnlineSafetyAct #PORTADA #privacidad #ReinoUnido #SeguridadInfantil #signal #Vigilancia
  35. Signal llama «vigilancia masiva» al plan del Reino Unido de escanear dispositivos

    El primer ministro Keir Starmer anunció en la London Tech Week que Apple y Google deberán activar herramientas para detectar imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores. Signal respondió con un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», advirtiendo que el sistema sentaría las bases para el control estatal sobre cualquier contenido privado (Fuente Signal).

    El gobierno del Reino Unido quiere que cada teléfono y tablet se convierta en un punto de control de imágenes. Signal dice que eso es exactamente el problema. La propuesta de escaneo de dispositivos fue anunciada por el primer ministro Keir Starmer durante la London Tech Week. Bajo el plan, compañías como Apple y Google deberían activar funciones integradas en smartphones y tablets para detectar y bloquear imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores.

    El alcance de lo que se pide es amplio. El gobierno quiere que las protecciones se apliquen en todo el dispositivo, incluyendo cámaras, aplicaciones de terceros, funciones de búsqueda y servicios de mensajería. Los adultos podrían seguir viendo o compartiendo contenido para adultos, pero solo después de pasar una verificación de edad. Si las empresas tecnológicas no actúan en un plazo de tres meses, el gobierno dice que impulsará una legislación con multas para las compañías y posible responsabilidad penal para sus ejecutivos.

    Apple ya tiene algo similar en funcionamiento. La compañía ofrece su función Communication Safety, que usa aprendizaje automático en el propio dispositivo para detectar fotos y videos de desnudos, difuminar el contenido y advertir a los menores antes de que lo vean o envíen. Apple recientemente presentó herramientas ampliadas de seguridad infantil en la WWDC26, aunque la propuesta del Reino Unido va más lejos al hacer el enfoque obligatorio y extenderlo más allá del ecosistema de Apple.

    La respuesta de Signal fue contundente. En un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», la app de mensajería cifrada señaló que obligar a los residentes del Reino Unido a probar su edad o tener su contenido escaneado simplemente para comunicarse es una propuesta peligrosa. Aunque el escaneo ocurra en el dispositivo, Signal argumenta que el sistema normalizaría la inspección de contenido privado antes de que pueda enviarse o verse.

    El argumento central de los críticos no es técnico, sino político. «Sabemos que las capacidades de vigilancia masiva y censura, por más sinceras que suenen las promesas de quienes las inician, nunca permanecen acotadas de forma estrecha», escribió Signal. Una vez que los teléfonos estén obligados a inspeccionar contenido para una categoría de material, el mismo sistema puede expandirse a lo que los gobiernos consideren amenazas o contenido dañino.

    Signal también advirtió que el sistema fortalecería el control que Apple, Google y Microsoft ya tienen sobre la información más personal de los usuarios, y sostuvo que la verdadera seguridad infantil debería significar mejor educación financiada, servicios sociales más sólidos y salvaguardas reales en plataformas de IA, no escaneo predeterminado en cada dispositivo.

    No es la primera vez que el Reino Unido choca con las grandes plataformas de mensajería cifrada. WhatsApp y Signal habían dicho anteriormente que preferirían abandonar el país antes que debilitar el cifrado bajo la Online Safety Bill. Más recientemente, las reglas de verificación de edad de la Online Safety Act impulsaron un aumento en el uso de VPNs.

    #APPLE #ciberseguridad #cifrado #clientsidescanning #encriptacion #google #KeirStarmer #mensajeria #OnlineSafetyAct #PORTADA #privacidad #ReinoUnido #SeguridadInfantil #signal #Vigilancia
  36. Signal llama «vigilancia masiva» al plan del Reino Unido de escanear dispositivos

    El primer ministro Keir Starmer anunció en la London Tech Week que Apple y Google deberán activar herramientas para detectar imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores. Signal respondió con un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», advirtiendo que el sistema sentaría las bases para el control estatal sobre cualquier contenido privado (Fuente Signal).

    El gobierno del Reino Unido quiere que cada teléfono y tablet se convierta en un punto de control de imágenes. Signal dice que eso es exactamente el problema. La propuesta de escaneo de dispositivos fue anunciada por el primer ministro Keir Starmer durante la London Tech Week. Bajo el plan, compañías como Apple y Google deberían activar funciones integradas en smartphones y tablets para detectar y bloquear imágenes de desnudos en dispositivos de menores.

    El alcance de lo que se pide es amplio. El gobierno quiere que las protecciones se apliquen en todo el dispositivo, incluyendo cámaras, aplicaciones de terceros, funciones de búsqueda y servicios de mensajería. Los adultos podrían seguir viendo o compartiendo contenido para adultos, pero solo después de pasar una verificación de edad. Si las empresas tecnológicas no actúan en un plazo de tres meses, el gobierno dice que impulsará una legislación con multas para las compañías y posible responsabilidad penal para sus ejecutivos.

    Apple ya tiene algo similar en funcionamiento. La compañía ofrece su función Communication Safety, que usa aprendizaje automático en el propio dispositivo para detectar fotos y videos de desnudos, difuminar el contenido y advertir a los menores antes de que lo vean o envíen. Apple recientemente presentó herramientas ampliadas de seguridad infantil en la WWDC26, aunque la propuesta del Reino Unido va más lejos al hacer el enfoque obligatorio y extenderlo más allá del ecosistema de Apple.

    La respuesta de Signal fue contundente. En un documento titulado «La vigilancia no es seguridad», la app de mensajería cifrada señaló que obligar a los residentes del Reino Unido a probar su edad o tener su contenido escaneado simplemente para comunicarse es una propuesta peligrosa. Aunque el escaneo ocurra en el dispositivo, Signal argumenta que el sistema normalizaría la inspección de contenido privado antes de que pueda enviarse o verse.

    El argumento central de los críticos no es técnico, sino político. «Sabemos que las capacidades de vigilancia masiva y censura, por más sinceras que suenen las promesas de quienes las inician, nunca permanecen acotadas de forma estrecha», escribió Signal. Una vez que los teléfonos estén obligados a inspeccionar contenido para una categoría de material, el mismo sistema puede expandirse a lo que los gobiernos consideren amenazas o contenido dañino.

    Signal también advirtió que el sistema fortalecería el control que Apple, Google y Microsoft ya tienen sobre la información más personal de los usuarios, y sostuvo que la verdadera seguridad infantil debería significar mejor educación financiada, servicios sociales más sólidos y salvaguardas reales en plataformas de IA, no escaneo predeterminado en cada dispositivo.

    No es la primera vez que el Reino Unido choca con las grandes plataformas de mensajería cifrada. WhatsApp y Signal habían dicho anteriormente que preferirían abandonar el país antes que debilitar el cifrado bajo la Online Safety Bill. Más recientemente, las reglas de verificación de edad de la Online Safety Act impulsaron un aumento en el uso de VPNs.

    #APPLE #ciberseguridad #cifrado #clientsidescanning #encriptacion #google #KeirStarmer #mensajeria #OnlineSafetyAct #PORTADA #privacidad #ReinoUnido #SeguridadInfantil #signal #Vigilancia
  37. “Signal President Meredith Whittaker threatens again to pull the encrypted messaging app out of the UK”

    Signal will not compromise user privacy in order to satisfy the UK Government. They could withdraw from UK app-stores, but further: they could block any account with an associated “+44” phone number – me included.

    Such a “nuclear option” would beneficially put the burden of responsibility on the UK Gov’t without background narrative nitpicking about “side loading”, “1st amendment”, and other nerd distractions.

    Video at:

    https://x.com/business/status/2064752727033352241

    Article at:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-10/signal-s-whittaker-threatens-uk-exit-amid-phone-screening-plan

    #ageVerification #censorship #clientSideScanning #signal
  38. “Signal President Meredith Whittaker threatens again to pull the encrypted messaging app out of the UK”

    Signal will not compromise user privacy in order to satisfy the UK Government. They could withdraw from UK app-stores, but further: they could block any account with an associated “+44” phone number – me included.

    Such a “nuclear option” would beneficially put the burden of responsibility on the UK Gov’t without background narrative nitpicking about “side loading”, “1st amendment”, and other nerd distractions.

    Video at:

    https://x.com/business/status/2064752727033352241

    Article at:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-10/signal-s-whittaker-threatens-uk-exit-amid-phone-screening-plan

    #ageVerification #censorship #clientSideScanning #signal
  39. “Signal President Meredith Whittaker threatens again to pull the encrypted messaging app out of the UK”

    Signal will not compromise user privacy in order to satisfy the UK Government. They could withdraw from UK app-stores, but further: they could block any account with an associated “+44” phone number – me included.

    Such a “nuclear option” would beneficially put the burden of responsibility on the UK Gov’t without background narrative nitpicking about “side loading”, “1st amendment”, and other nerd distractions.

    Video at:

    https://x.com/business/status/2064752727033352241

    Article at:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-10/signal-s-whittaker-threatens-uk-exit-amid-phone-screening-plan

    #ageVerification #censorship #clientSideScanning #signal
  40. CW: UKPol kids and images and tech

    I see the prime minister and home secretary are lying, just blatantly lying, about the existence of technology which can tell how old someone is and whether an image is porn or not.

    They claim this technology already exists in phones and just needs to be turned on.

    I mean, judges at trials haven't been able to describe what is or isn't pornography, but apparently I guess they should have just turned on the software switch in their phones! Easy!

    No phone can know it's operator's age. Even if the phone's owner is registered, it can't know if it's being operated by it's owner or not.

    The PM and Home Sec are lying that they think there's no reporting, no data-collection, no spying, no monitoring, involved in their impossible imaginary tech they demand must be implemented in 3 months.

    They are lying that adults can turn it off without having to register the owner of the phone and it's ID with a central database.

    Never head anyone even mention the environmental consequences of burning power to pass every image a camera takes through a large neural network to have it be classified as porn or not, so at least they haven't had to lie about it being free and easy and not burning energy to classify every image taken in the UK.

    Good thing they have little chance of being in power when their deadline hits and the tech companies have failed to turn on the imaginary software switch to do impossible things.

    Sadly, Burnham's government will probably do much the same.

    #ukpol #tech #clientSideScanning #survelienceState

  41. CW: UKPol kids and images and tech

    I see the prime minister and home secretary are lying, just blatantly lying, about the existence of technology which can tell how old someone is and whether an image is porn or not.

    They claim this technology already exists in phones and just needs to be turned on.

    I mean, judges at trials haven't been able to describe what is or isn't pornography, but apparently I guess they should have just turned on the software switch in their phones! Easy!

    No phone can know it's operator's age. Even if the phone's owner is registered, it can't know if it's being operated by it's owner or not.

    The PM and Home Sec are lying that they think there's no reporting, no data-collection, no spying, no monitoring, involved in their impossible imaginary tech they demand must be implemented in 3 months.

    They are lying that adults can turn it off without having to register the owner of the phone and it's ID with a central database.

    Never head anyone even mention the environmental consequences of burning power to pass every image a camera takes through a large neural network to have it be classified as porn or not, so at least they haven't had to lie about it being free and easy and not burning energy to classify every image taken in the UK.

    Good thing they have little chance of being in power when their deadline hits and the tech companies have failed to turn on the imaginary software switch to do impossible things.

    Sadly, Burnham's government will probably do much the same.

    #ukpol #tech #clientSideScanning #survelienceState

  42. CW: UKPol kids and images and tech

    I see the prime minister and home secretary are lying, just blatantly lying, about the existence of technology which can tell how old someone is and whether an image is porn or not.

    They claim this technology already exists in phones and just needs to be turned on.

    I mean, judges at trials haven't been able to describe what is or isn't pornography, but apparently I guess they should have just turned on the software switch in their phones! Easy!

    No phone can know it's operator's age. Even if the phone's owner is registered, it can't know if it's being operated by it's owner or not.

    The PM and Home Sec are lying that they think there's no reporting, no data-collection, no spying, no monitoring, involved in their impossible imaginary tech they demand must be implemented in 3 months.

    They are lying that adults can turn it off without having to register the owner of the phone and it's ID with a central database.

    Never head anyone even mention the environmental consequences of burning power to pass every image a camera takes through a large neural network to have it be classified as porn or not, so at least they haven't had to lie about it being free and easy and not burning energy to classify every image taken in the UK.

    Good thing they have little chance of being in power when their deadline hits and the tech companies have failed to turn on the imaginary software switch to do impossible things.

    Sadly, Burnham's government will probably do much the same.

    #ukpol #tech #clientSideScanning #survelienceState

  43. CW: UKPol kids and images and tech

    I see the prime minister and home secretary are lying, just blatantly lying, about the existence of technology which can tell how old someone is and whether an image is porn or not.

    They claim this technology already exists in phones and just needs to be turned on.

    I mean, judges at trials haven't been able to describe what is or isn't pornography, but apparently I guess they should have just turned on the software switch in their phones! Easy!

    No phone can know it's operator's age. Even if the phone's owner is registered, it can't know if it's being operated by it's owner or not.

    The PM and Home Sec are lying that they think there's no reporting, no data-collection, no spying, no monitoring, involved in their impossible imaginary tech they demand must be implemented in 3 months.

    They are lying that adults can turn it off without having to register the owner of the phone and it's ID with a central database.

    Never head anyone even mention the environmental consequences of burning power to pass every image a camera takes through a large neural network to have it be classified as porn or not, so at least they haven't had to lie about it being free and easy and not burning energy to classify every image taken in the UK.

    Good thing they have little chance of being in power when their deadline hits and the tech companies have failed to turn on the imaginary software switch to do impossible things.

    Sadly, Burnham's government will probably do much the same.

    #ukpol #tech #clientSideScanning #survelienceState

  44. CW: UKPol kids and images and tech

    I see the prime minister and home secretary are lying, just blatantly lying, about the existence of technology which can tell how old someone is and whether an image is porn or not.

    They claim this technology already exists in phones and just needs to be turned on.

    I mean, judges at trials haven't been able to describe what is or isn't pornography, but apparently I guess they should have just turned on the software switch in their phones! Easy!

    No phone can know it's operator's age. Even if the phone's owner is registered, it can't know if it's being operated by it's owner or not.

    The PM and Home Sec are lying that they think there's no reporting, no data-collection, no spying, no monitoring, involved in their impossible imaginary tech they demand must be implemented in 3 months.

    They are lying that adults can turn it off without having to register the owner of the phone and it's ID with a central database.

    Never head anyone even mention the environmental consequences of burning power to pass every image a camera takes through a large neural network to have it be classified as porn or not, so at least they haven't had to lie about it being free and easy and not burning energy to classify every image taken in the UK.

    Good thing they have little chance of being in power when their deadline hits and the tech companies have failed to turn on the imaginary software switch to do impossible things.

    Sadly, Burnham's government will probably do much the same.

    #ukpol #tech #clientSideScanning #survelienceState

  45. 🚀The Global War on End-to-End Encryption🔒
    Join Impractical Privacy as we delve into the coordinated global push to undermine digital privacy and security.

    Listen to learn about Client-Side Scanning, Compliance as a Vector, and the fight for mathematical sovereignty!🔑

    #C22Debate
    #ClientSideScanning
    #GlobalSurveillanceNet
    #KeepYourDataPrivate
    #TakeBackTheKey
    #OpenSourceFreedom
    #SecureCommunication
    #PrivacyRights
    #NoCompromisesOnSecurity
    #Privacy
    #Surveillance

    📻 Stream at ImpracticalPrivacy.com

  46. 🚀The Global War on End-to-End Encryption🔒
    Join Impractical Privacy as we delve into the coordinated global push to undermine digital privacy and security.

    Listen to learn about Client-Side Scanning, Compliance as a Vector, and the fight for mathematical sovereignty!🔑

    #C22Debate
    #ClientSideScanning
    #GlobalSurveillanceNet
    #KeepYourDataPrivate
    #TakeBackTheKey
    #OpenSourceFreedom
    #SecureCommunication
    #PrivacyRights
    #NoCompromisesOnSecurity
    #Privacy
    #Surveillance

    📻 Stream at ImpracticalPrivacy.com