Walter Rauschenbusch, in Christianity and the Social Crisis, spends a lot of time talking about the revolutionary power of the #Gospel, and the #Church as a whole.
Then, chapter 4 is titled: Why Has Christianity Never Undertaken the Work of Social Reconstruction?
Which is a a great question. There's a lot to it, but this paragraph in particular struck me:
Moreover, these early Christians were subject to the same limitations of human nature to which we all are prone. They, too, were creatures of custom. Before slavery was abolished in our country, there were millions of genuine Christians, honestly willing to see and do the right in other matters, to whom it seemed a preposterous proposition that slavery is incompatible with Christianity. To them it was a necessary and fundamental human institution, like the family or the school. To-day there are very few Christians who realize that it is a crying wrong to hold land idle for speculation in cities where men’s lungs are rotting away, overgrown with tuberculosis bacilli for lack of air; few who realize that it is a flat denial of Christianity to take advantage of the needs of your fellow-man to buy his labor cheaply or sell him your goods dearly. These things seem to us a necessary and inevitable part of the structure of society. If, therefore, the early Christians accepted the universal institution of slavery as part of the social universe; if it was centuries before we hear any straight declaration against the principle of slavery in the Church; and if the Church itself became a great slave-owner in the later days of its wealth -- need we be surprised who have had nineteen centuries of Christian influences upon us and who are still so blind to wrong?
#Christianity #ChristianSocialism #Socialism