#carygrant — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #carygrant, aggregated by home.social.
-
Al Pacino names the greatest movie star in Hollywood history
Credit: Far Out / YouTube Still Fri 10 July 2026 17:45, UK Actors and movie stars are often…
#NewsBeep #News #Celebrities #actor #actors #alpacino #CaryGrant #Entertainment #Hollywood #UK #UnitedKingdom
https://www.newsbeep.com/uk/685487/ -
Cine «Historias de Filadelfia»
Título original: The Philadelphia Story [1]
Título en español de España: Historias de Filadelfia [1]
Título en español latinoamericano: Pecadora equivocada (también distribuida en algunos países o ediciones de doblaje como La historia de Filadelfia). [1, 2]
Calificación edad (Escala Oscar): TP: Todo Público [3]
Director: George Cukor [1]
Actores principales: Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant, James Stewart, y Ruth Hussey. [4]
País: Estados Unidos [2]
Género: Comedia romántica / Comedia de enredos (Screwball comedy). [1, 5, 6]
Año: 1940 [1]
Calificación calidad: Excelente (5/5). Es considerada un clásico absoluto del séptimo arte, manteniendo un rotundo 100% de aprobación crítica en Rotten Tomatoes y figurando formalmente en la lista de las mejores comedias del American Film Institute. [1, 3]
Argumento y comentario:
Una mansión de familia aristócrata, la familia Lord se viste de gala para la inminente segundo matrimonio de la sofisticada y fría heredera Tracy Lord con el acaudalado y pretencioso George Kitteredge. La cosa se complica de forma radical cuando su carismático ex-marido, C.K Dexter Haven, vuelve a aparecerse de pronto trayendo con el a un cínico reportero de prensa rosa llamado Macaulay «Mike» Connor, que está infiltrado para cubrir la exclusiva del evento. En el transcurso de un día y una noche de enredos y excesos alcohólicos, el reportero se enamorará perdidamente de Tracy, forzándola a enfrentarse a sus propios prejuicios, a plantearse su inalcanzable postura ante la vida y descubrir a cuál de los tres hombres ama en verdad.
Comentario: La película brilla de forma eterna gracias a unos diálogos de ritmo milimétrico y punzante ingenio. Supuso además el salvavidas profesional de Katharine Hepburn, quien tras ser declarada «veneno para la taquilla» recuperó el control de su carrera produciendo astutamente la adaptación. La cinta destaca también por otorgar el primer y único premio Óscar de la academia a James Stewart como actor principal. [2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Video:
Puedes disfrutar del avance y escenas clásicas de la película mediante el Tráiler Oficial de The Philadelphia Story en YouTube. [5, 8]FUENTES:
[2] https://doblaje.fandom.com
[5] https://www.filmaffinity.com
[6] https://simple.wikipedia.org
[7] https://www.filmaffinity.com
#CaryGrant #CineClásico #CineDeOro #ComediaRomántica #dailyprompt #GeorgeCukor #HistoriasDeFiladelfia #JamesStewart #KatherineHepburn #Oscars #PecadoraEquivada #ScrewballComedy #ThePhiladelphiaStory -
Cine «Historias de Filadelfia»
Título original: The Philadelphia Story [1]
Título en español de España: Historias de Filadelfia [1]
Título en español latinoamericano: Pecadora equivocada (también distribuida en algunos países o ediciones de doblaje como La historia de Filadelfia). [1, 2]
Calificación edad (Escala Oscar): TP: Todo Público [3]
Director: George Cukor [1]
Actores principales: Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant, James Stewart, y Ruth Hussey. [4]
País: Estados Unidos [2]
Género: Comedia romántica / Comedia de enredos (Screwball comedy). [1, 5, 6]
Año: 1940 [1]
Calificación calidad: Excelente (5/5). Es considerada un clásico absoluto del séptimo arte, manteniendo un rotundo 100% de aprobación crítica en Rotten Tomatoes y figurando formalmente en la lista de las mejores comedias del American Film Institute. [1, 3]
Argumento y comentario:
Una mansión de familia aristócrata, la familia Lord se viste de gala para la inminente segundo matrimonio de la sofisticada y fría heredera Tracy Lord con el acaudalado y pretencioso George Kitteredge. La cosa se complica de forma radical cuando su carismático ex-marido, C.K Dexter Haven, vuelve a aparecerse de pronto trayendo con el a un cínico reportero de prensa rosa llamado Macaulay «Mike» Connor, que está infiltrado para cubrir la exclusiva del evento. En el transcurso de un día y una noche de enredos y excesos alcohólicos, el reportero se enamorará perdidamente de Tracy, forzándola a enfrentarse a sus propios prejuicios, a plantearse su inalcanzable postura ante la vida y descubrir a cuál de los tres hombres ama en verdad.
Comentario: La película brilla de forma eterna gracias a unos diálogos de ritmo milimétrico y punzante ingenio. Supuso además el salvavidas profesional de Katharine Hepburn, quien tras ser declarada «veneno para la taquilla» recuperó el control de su carrera produciendo astutamente la adaptación. La cinta destaca también por otorgar el primer y único premio Óscar de la academia a James Stewart como actor principal. [2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Video:
Puedes disfrutar del avance y escenas clásicas de la película mediante el Tráiler Oficial de The Philadelphia Story en YouTube. [5, 8]FUENTES:
[2] https://doblaje.fandom.com
[5] https://www.filmaffinity.com
[6] https://simple.wikipedia.org
[7] https://www.filmaffinity.com
#CaryGrant #CineClásico #CineDeOro #ComediaRomántica #dailyprompt #GeorgeCukor #HistoriasDeFiladelfia #JamesStewart #KatherineHepburn #Oscars #PecadoraEquivada #ScrewballComedy #ThePhiladelphiaStory -
Cine «Historias de Filadelfia»
Título original: The Philadelphia Story [1]
Título en español de España: Historias de Filadelfia [1]
Título en español latinoamericano: Pecadora equivocada (también distribuida en algunos países o ediciones de doblaje como La historia de Filadelfia). [1, 2]
Calificación edad (Escala Oscar): TP: Todo Público [3]
Director: George Cukor [1]
Actores principales: Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant, James Stewart, y Ruth Hussey. [4]
País: Estados Unidos [2]
Género: Comedia romántica / Comedia de enredos (Screwball comedy). [1, 5, 6]
Año: 1940 [1]
Calificación calidad: Excelente (5/5). Es considerada un clásico absoluto del séptimo arte, manteniendo un rotundo 100% de aprobación crítica en Rotten Tomatoes y figurando formalmente en la lista de las mejores comedias del American Film Institute. [1, 3]
Argumento y comentario:
Una mansión de familia aristócrata, la familia Lord se viste de gala para la inminente segundo matrimonio de la sofisticada y fría heredera Tracy Lord con el acaudalado y pretencioso George Kitteredge. La cosa se complica de forma radical cuando su carismático ex-marido, C.K Dexter Haven, vuelve a aparecerse de pronto trayendo con el a un cínico reportero de prensa rosa llamado Macaulay «Mike» Connor, que está infiltrado para cubrir la exclusiva del evento. En el transcurso de un día y una noche de enredos y excesos alcohólicos, el reportero se enamorará perdidamente de Tracy, forzándola a enfrentarse a sus propios prejuicios, a plantearse su inalcanzable postura ante la vida y descubrir a cuál de los tres hombres ama en verdad.
Comentario: La película brilla de forma eterna gracias a unos diálogos de ritmo milimétrico y punzante ingenio. Supuso además el salvavidas profesional de Katharine Hepburn, quien tras ser declarada «veneno para la taquilla» recuperó el control de su carrera produciendo astutamente la adaptación. La cinta destaca también por otorgar el primer y único premio Óscar de la academia a James Stewart como actor principal. [2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Video:
Puedes disfrutar del avance y escenas clásicas de la película mediante el Tráiler Oficial de The Philadelphia Story en YouTube. [5, 8]FUENTES:
[2] https://doblaje.fandom.com
[5] https://www.filmaffinity.com
[6] https://simple.wikipedia.org
[7] https://www.filmaffinity.com
#CaryGrant #CineClásico #CineDeOro #ComediaRomántica #dailyprompt #GeorgeCukor #HistoriasDeFiladelfia #JamesStewart #KatherineHepburn #Oscars #PecadoraEquivada #ScrewballComedy #ThePhiladelphiaStory -
Cine «Historias de Filadelfia»
Título original: The Philadelphia Story [1]
Título en español de España: Historias de Filadelfia [1]
Título en español latinoamericano: Pecadora equivocada (también distribuida en algunos países o ediciones de doblaje como La historia de Filadelfia). [1, 2]
Calificación edad (Escala Oscar): TP: Todo Público [3]
Director: George Cukor [1]
Actores principales: Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant, James Stewart, y Ruth Hussey. [4]
País: Estados Unidos [2]
Género: Comedia romántica / Comedia de enredos (Screwball comedy). [1, 5, 6]
Año: 1940 [1]
Calificación calidad: Excelente (5/5). Es considerada un clásico absoluto del séptimo arte, manteniendo un rotundo 100% de aprobación crítica en Rotten Tomatoes y figurando formalmente en la lista de las mejores comedias del American Film Institute. [1, 3]
Argumento y comentario:
Una mansión de familia aristócrata, la familia Lord se viste de gala para la inminente segundo matrimonio de la sofisticada y fría heredera Tracy Lord con el acaudalado y pretencioso George Kitteredge. La cosa se complica de forma radical cuando su carismático ex-marido, C.K Dexter Haven, vuelve a aparecerse de pronto trayendo con el a un cínico reportero de prensa rosa llamado Macaulay «Mike» Connor, que está infiltrado para cubrir la exclusiva del evento. En el transcurso de un día y una noche de enredos y excesos alcohólicos, el reportero se enamorará perdidamente de Tracy, forzándola a enfrentarse a sus propios prejuicios, a plantearse su inalcanzable postura ante la vida y descubrir a cuál de los tres hombres ama en verdad.
Comentario: La película brilla de forma eterna gracias a unos diálogos de ritmo milimétrico y punzante ingenio. Supuso además el salvavidas profesional de Katharine Hepburn, quien tras ser declarada «veneno para la taquilla» recuperó el control de su carrera produciendo astutamente la adaptación. La cinta destaca también por otorgar el primer y único premio Óscar de la academia a James Stewart como actor principal. [2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Video:
Puedes disfrutar del avance y escenas clásicas de la película mediante el Tráiler Oficial de The Philadelphia Story en YouTube. [5, 8]FUENTES:
[2] https://doblaje.fandom.com
[5] https://www.filmaffinity.com
[6] https://simple.wikipedia.org
[7] https://www.filmaffinity.com
#CaryGrant #CineClásico #CineDeOro #ComediaRomántica #dailyprompt #GeorgeCukor #HistoriasDeFiladelfia #JamesStewart #KatherineHepburn #Oscars #PecadoraEquivada #ScrewballComedy #ThePhiladelphiaStory -
Cine «Historias de Filadelfia»
Título original: The Philadelphia Story [1]
Título en español de España: Historias de Filadelfia [1]
Título en español latinoamericano: Pecadora equivocada (también distribuida en algunos países o ediciones de doblaje como La historia de Filadelfia). [1, 2]
Calificación edad (Escala Oscar): TP: Todo Público [3]
Director: George Cukor [1]
Actores principales: Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant, James Stewart, y Ruth Hussey. [4]
País: Estados Unidos [2]
Género: Comedia romántica / Comedia de enredos (Screwball comedy). [1, 5, 6]
Año: 1940 [1]
Calificación calidad: Excelente (5/5). Es considerada un clásico absoluto del séptimo arte, manteniendo un rotundo 100% de aprobación crítica en Rotten Tomatoes y figurando formalmente en la lista de las mejores comedias del American Film Institute. [1, 3]
Argumento y comentario:
Una mansión de familia aristócrata, la familia Lord se viste de gala para la inminente segundo matrimonio de la sofisticada y fría heredera Tracy Lord con el acaudalado y pretencioso George Kitteredge. La cosa se complica de forma radical cuando su carismático ex-marido, C.K Dexter Haven, vuelve a aparecerse de pronto trayendo con el a un cínico reportero de prensa rosa llamado Macaulay «Mike» Connor, que está infiltrado para cubrir la exclusiva del evento. En el transcurso de un día y una noche de enredos y excesos alcohólicos, el reportero se enamorará perdidamente de Tracy, forzándola a enfrentarse a sus propios prejuicios, a plantearse su inalcanzable postura ante la vida y descubrir a cuál de los tres hombres ama en verdad.
Comentario: La película brilla de forma eterna gracias a unos diálogos de ritmo milimétrico y punzante ingenio. Supuso además el salvavidas profesional de Katharine Hepburn, quien tras ser declarada «veneno para la taquilla» recuperó el control de su carrera produciendo astutamente la adaptación. La cinta destaca también por otorgar el primer y único premio Óscar de la academia a James Stewart como actor principal. [2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Video:
Puedes disfrutar del avance y escenas clásicas de la película mediante el Tráiler Oficial de The Philadelphia Story en YouTube. [5, 8]FUENTES:
[2] https://doblaje.fandom.com
[5] https://www.filmaffinity.com
[6] https://simple.wikipedia.org
[7] https://www.filmaffinity.com
#CaryGrant #CineClásico #CineDeOro #ComediaRomántica #dailyprompt #GeorgeCukor #HistoriasDeFiladelfia #JamesStewart #KatherineHepburn #Oscars #PecadoraEquivada #ScrewballComedy #ThePhiladelphiaStory -
https://www.europesays.com/ie/558065/ Happy birthday, Mel Brooks: 100 gloriously tasteless years. Long may you remain above ground – The Irish Times #CaryGrant #Celebrities #DavidLynch #Éire #Entertainment #GeneWilder #IE #Ireland #JamesJoyce #MelBrooks #RichardPryor
-
(16/16) ... #HowardHawks avec #CaryGrant #KatharineHepburn métaphore #lgbtq.
- Saxe : Naissance de #GeorgBaselitz.
- Empire UK : Londres -> East End : 14 % des maisons du quartier de Shoreditch sont équipées de salles de bains #eau.#film Ei koskaan yksin
#year1938 #anthropocene #climat #climate #climatechange #histoire #politique #fascisme
-
(16/16) ... #HowardHawks avec #CaryGrant #KatharineHepburn métaphore #lgbtq.
- Saxe : Naissance de #GeorgBaselitz.
- Empire UK : Londres -> East End : 14 % des maisons du quartier de Shoreditch sont équipées de salles de bains #eau.#film Ei koskaan yksin
#year1938 #anthropocene #climat #climate #climatechange #histoire #politique #fascisme
-
(16/16) ... #HowardHawks avec #CaryGrant #KatharineHepburn métaphore #lgbtq.
- Saxe : Naissance de #GeorgBaselitz.
- Empire UK : Londres -> East End : 14 % des maisons du quartier de Shoreditch sont équipées de salles de bains #eau.#film Ei koskaan yksin
#year1938 #anthropocene #climat #climate #climatechange #histoire #politique #fascisme
-
(16/16) ... #HowardHawks avec #CaryGrant #KatharineHepburn métaphore #lgbtq.
- Saxe : Naissance de #GeorgBaselitz.
- Empire UK : Londres -> East End : 14 % des maisons du quartier de Shoreditch sont équipées de salles de bains #eau.#film Ei koskaan yksin
#year1938 #anthropocene #climat #climate #climatechange #histoire #politique #fascisme
-
https://www.europesays.com/hu/136110/ 5 akciódús kémthriller, ami jobb, mint bármelyik James Bond-film #ASzamuráj #AlainDelon #AlfredHitchcock #BrianDePalma #CaryGrant #Entertainment #északészaknyugat #Filmek #FranciaKapcsolat #GeneHackman #HU #Hungarian #Hungary #JeanPierreMelville #kémthriller #ListásCikk #Magyar #Magyarország #MichaelCaine #MikeHodges #Mission:Impossible #Movie #mozi #öldMegCartert! #RoyScheider #Szórakozás #TomCruise #WilliamFriedkin
-
Alternative universe version of The Seven Year Itch; Tom Ewell's a closeted bisexual character who just found out he has two new neighbours on either side of his apartment.
Marilyn Monroe AND Cary Grant! 🥵
And - oh no! - his ultra conservative parents are coming over to visit this weekend! 😱
#MarilynMonroe #TomEwell #CaryGrant #PrideMonth -
Alternative universe version of The Seven Year Itch; Tom Ewell's a closeted bisexual character who just found out he has two new neighbours on either side of his apartment.
Marilyn Monroe AND Cary Grant! 🥵
And - oh no! - his ultra conservative parents are coming over to visit this weekend! 😱
#MarilynMonroe #TomEwell #CaryGrant #PrideMonth -
Alternative universe version of The Seven Year Itch; Tom Ewell's a closeted bisexual character who just found out he has two new neighbours on either side of his apartment.
Marilyn Monroe AND Cary Grant! 🥵
And - oh no! - his ultra conservative parents are coming over to visit this weekend! 😱
#MarilynMonroe #TomEwell #CaryGrant #PrideMonth -
Alternative universe version of The Seven Year Itch; Tom Ewell's a closeted bisexual character who just found out he has two new neighbours on either side of his apartment.
Marilyn Monroe AND Cary Grant! 🥵
And - oh no! - his ultra conservative parents are coming over to visit this weekend! 😱
#MarilynMonroe #TomEwell #CaryGrant #PrideMonth -
Alternative universe version of The Seven Year Itch; Tom Ewell's a closeted bisexual character who just found out he has two new neighbours on either side of his apartment.
Marilyn Monroe AND Cary Grant! 🥵
And - oh no! - his ultra conservative parents are coming over to visit this weekend! 😱
#MarilynMonroe #TomEwell #CaryGrant #PrideMonth -
SCIARADA - DOMINION (5 di 10)
Nel quinto episodio di Dominion - Cinema Senza Copyright ti racconto qualcosa su SCIARADA, diretto da Stanley Donen nel 1963.
Sai che questo film avrà un ruolo importantissimo nel corso delle produzioni future note come Nuova Hollywood?
@spettacoli @digg @film-IndieWire
#charade #sciarada #audreyhepburn #carygrant #cristianodalianera #dominion #cinema #storiadelcinema #film #movie #cultmovie #piedini #podcast #cinerolla
-
SCIARADA - DOMINION (5 di 10)
Nel quinto episodio di Dominion - Cinema Senza Copyright ti racconto qualcosa su SCIARADA, diretto da Stanley Donen nel 1963.
Sai che questo film avrà un ruolo importantissimo nel corso delle produzioni future note come Nuova Hollywood?
@spettacoli @digg @film-IndieWire
#charade #sciarada #audreyhepburn #carygrant #cristianodalianera #dominion #cinema #storiadelcinema #film #movie #cultmovie #piedini #podcast #cinerolla
-
SCIARADA - DOMINION (5 di 10)
Nel quinto episodio di Dominion - Cinema Senza Copyright ti racconto qualcosa su SCIARADA, diretto da Stanley Donen nel 1963.
Sai che questo film avrà un ruolo importantissimo nel corso delle produzioni future note come Nuova Hollywood?
@spettacoli @digg @film-IndieWire
#charade #sciarada #audreyhepburn #carygrant #cristianodalianera #dominion #cinema #storiadelcinema #film #movie #cultmovie #piedini #podcast #cinerolla
-
SCIARADA - DOMINION (5 di 10)
Nel quinto episodio di Dominion - Cinema Senza Copyright ti racconto qualcosa su SCIARADA, diretto da Stanley Donen nel 1963.
Sai che questo film avrà un ruolo importantissimo nel corso delle produzioni future note come Nuova Hollywood?
@spettacoli @digg @film-IndieWire
#charade #sciarada #audreyhepburn #carygrant #cristianodalianera #dominion #cinema #storiadelcinema #film #movie #cultmovie #piedini #podcast #cinerolla
-
SCIARADA - DOMINION (5 di 10)
Nel quinto episodio di Dominion - Cinema Senza Copyright ti racconto qualcosa su SCIARADA, diretto da Stanley Donen nel 1963.
Sai che questo film avrà un ruolo importantissimo nel corso delle produzioni future note come Nuova Hollywood?
@spettacoli @digg @film-IndieWire
#charade #sciarada #audreyhepburn #carygrant #cristianodalianera #dominion #cinema #storiadelcinema #film #movie #cultmovie #piedini #podcast #cinerolla
-
(15/15)
- #cinema USA doit contourner censure code Hayes (cf 1930 1959 + Poutine Donald #woke 2024 2025) -> #film L'Impossible Monsieur Bébé #BringingUpBaby d' #HowardHawks avec #CaryGrant #KatharineHepburn métaphore #lgbtq.
- Saxe : Naissance de #GeorgBaselitz.
- Empire UK : Londres -> East End : 14 % des maisons du quartier de Shoreditch sont équipées de salles de bains #eau.#film Ei koskaan yksin
#year1938 #anthropocene #climat #climate #climatechange #histoire #politique #fascisme
-
The 1944 movie that truly broke Cary Grant’s heart
Credit: RKO publicity It’s hard to argue that there was anyone more charismatic than Cary Grant during the…
#NewsBeep #News #Movies #boxoffice #CaryGrant #Entertainment #Hollywood #movie #UK #UnitedKingdom
https://www.newsbeep.com/uk/567139/ -
The 1944 movie that truly broke Cary Grant’s heart
Credit: RKO publicity It’s hard to argue that there was anyone more charismatic than Cary Grant during the…
#NewsBeep #News #Movies #boxoffice #CaryGrant #Entertainment #Hollywood #movie #UK #UnitedKingdom
https://www.newsbeep.com/uk/567139/ -
Just watched "Charade" with Audrey Hepburn and Cary Grant (and later-to-be-quite-big-stars like Walter Matthau and Lee Marvin, the latter with a preposterous "Texan" accent and on at least one occasion definitely forgetting his lines).
It's a really good movie, with several excellent twists and turns. Obviously of its time, which means having to wince and move on a few times, but still some very funny and some very tense moments.
Recommended!
-
Just watched "Charade" with Audrey Hepburn and Cary Grant (and later-to-be-quite-big-stars like Walter Matthau and Lee Marvin, the latter with a preposterous "Texan" accent and on at least one occasion definitely forgetting his lines).
It's a really good movie, with several excellent twists and turns. Obviously of its time, which means having to wince and move on a few times, but still some very funny and some very tense moments.
Recommended!
-
Just watched "Charade" with Audrey Hepburn and Cary Grant (and later-to-be-quite-big-stars like Walter Matthau and Lee Marvin, the latter with a preposterous "Texan" accent and on at least one occasion definitely forgetting his lines).
It's a really good movie, with several excellent twists and turns. Obviously of its time, which means having to wince and move on a few times, but still some very funny and some very tense moments.
Recommended!
-
Olen viettänyt sunnuntaita katsomalla YleAreenasta vanhoja elokuvia. #CaryGrant #TonyCurtis #MarilynMonroe
-
Olen viettänyt sunnuntaita katsomalla YleAreenasta vanhoja elokuvia. #CaryGrant #TonyCurtis #MarilynMonroe
-
Olen viettänyt sunnuntaita katsomalla YleAreenasta vanhoja elokuvia. #CaryGrant #TonyCurtis #MarilynMonroe
-
Olen viettänyt sunnuntaita katsomalla YleAreenasta vanhoja elokuvia. #CaryGrant #TonyCurtis #MarilynMonroe
-
“Individuals may form communities, but only institutions can create a nation”*…
Traffic police in Rome, 1981.Good institutions are social technologies that scale trust from personal relations to entire nations. Game theorist and social scientist Julien Lie-Panis unpacks the extraordinary phenomenon of human cooperation to explain how– and why– institutions work…
Every human society, from the smallest village to the largest nation, faces the same fundamental challenge: how to get people to act in the interests of the collective rather than their own. Fishermen must limit their catch so fish stocks don’t collapse. People must respect others’ property and safety. Citizens must pay taxes to fund roads, schools and hospitals. Left to pure self-interest, no community could endure; the bonds of collective life would quickly unravel.
The solutions we’ve devised are remarkably similar across cultures and centuries. We create rules. Then we appoint guardians to enforce them. Those who break the rules are punished. But there’s a problem with this approach, one that the Roman poet Juvenal identified nearly 2,000 years ago: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guards themselves?
Fisheries appoint monitors to prevent overfishing – but what if the monitors accept bribes to look the other way? Police officers exist to protect everyone’s property and safety – but who ensures that they don’t abuse their power? Governments collect taxes for public services – but how do we stop officials from diverting the funds to their own accounts?
Every institution faces the same fundamental paradox. Institutions foster cooperation by rewarding good behaviour and punishing rule-breakers. Yet they themselves depend on cooperative members to function. We haven’t solved the cooperation problem – we’ve simply moved it back one step. So why do institutions work at all? To understand this puzzle, we need to first ask what makes human cooperation so extraordinary in the natural world…
[Lie-Panis explores human cooperation, and examines the ways in which, while it follows the same evolutionary rules as cooperation among other species, humans have expanded the ambit of their coordination. He explains the ways in which institutions depend on “a present-future trade-off,” on its constituents’ patience as it works through problems. And he illustrates the ways in which constituents’ concerns with material security and social capital can generate that patience. He concludes…]
… Institutions can thus be understood as social technologies. We engineer them constantly, often without realising it. When neighbours organise to maintain a shared garden or playground, they appoint a small committee to manage funds and decisions. The arrangement works because it transforms the hard problem of coordinating dozens of contributors into the easier problem of trusting a few visible people who can be praised for diligence or blamed for misuse.
Like any tool, institutions cannot create what isn’t already there; they can only amplify existing cooperative capacity. Institutions rest on the conditions that make cooperation rational: material security and social capital. Where those conditions hold, reputation can work at scale. One layer of accountability supports the next, until cooperation extends far beyond the limits of familiarity. From the same force that binds vampire bats and coral reef fish, we have built cities, markets, and nations. Institutions are how trust is scaled to millions of strangers.
Eminently worth reading in full: “Guarding the Guardians,” from @jliep.bsky.social in @aeon.co.
Apposite (albeit a bit orthogonal): “Culture Is the Mass-Synchronization of Framings,” from @marco-giancotti.bsky.social.
* Benjamin Disraeli
###
As we get along, we might recall that it was on this date in 1938 that a film poking fun at a plethora of institutions, Howard Hawks’ comedy Bringing Up Baby, premiered at the Golden Gate Theater in San Francisco. Featuring Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, and a leopard, the film earned good reviews but suffered at the box office. Indeed, Hepburn’s career fell into a slump– she was one of a group of actors labeled as “box office poison” by the Independent Theatre Owners of America– that she broke with The Philadelphia Story (again with Grant) in 1940.
As for Bringing Up Baby, the film did well when re-released in the 1940s, and grew further in popularity when it began to be shown on television in the 1950s. Today it is recognized as the authentic screwball classic that it is; it sits at 94% on Rotten Tomatoes, and ranks among “Top 100” on lists from the American Film Institute and the National Society of Film Critics.
#BringingUpBaby #CaryGrant #cooperation #culture #film #history #HowardHawks #institutions #KatherineHepburn #movies #politics #reputation #socialCapital #socialInfrastructure #socialTechnology #society -
“Individuals may form communities, but only institutions can create a nation”*…
Traffic police in Rome, 1981.Good institutions are social technologies that scale trust from personal relations to entire nations. Game theorist and social scientist Julien Lie-Panis unpacks the extraordinary phenomenon of human cooperation to explain how– and why– institutions work…
Every human society, from the smallest village to the largest nation, faces the same fundamental challenge: how to get people to act in the interests of the collective rather than their own. Fishermen must limit their catch so fish stocks don’t collapse. People must respect others’ property and safety. Citizens must pay taxes to fund roads, schools and hospitals. Left to pure self-interest, no community could endure; the bonds of collective life would quickly unravel.
The solutions we’ve devised are remarkably similar across cultures and centuries. We create rules. Then we appoint guardians to enforce them. Those who break the rules are punished. But there’s a problem with this approach, one that the Roman poet Juvenal identified nearly 2,000 years ago: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guards themselves?
Fisheries appoint monitors to prevent overfishing – but what if the monitors accept bribes to look the other way? Police officers exist to protect everyone’s property and safety – but who ensures that they don’t abuse their power? Governments collect taxes for public services – but how do we stop officials from diverting the funds to their own accounts?
Every institution faces the same fundamental paradox. Institutions foster cooperation by rewarding good behaviour and punishing rule-breakers. Yet they themselves depend on cooperative members to function. We haven’t solved the cooperation problem – we’ve simply moved it back one step. So why do institutions work at all? To understand this puzzle, we need to first ask what makes human cooperation so extraordinary in the natural world…
[Lie-Panis explores human cooperation, and examines the ways in which, while it follows the same evolutionary rules as cooperation among other species, humans have expanded the ambit of their coordination. He explains the ways in which institutions depend on “a present-future trade-off,” on its constituents’ patience as it works through problems. And he illustrates the ways in which constituents’ concerns with material security and social capital can generate that patience. He concludes…]
… Institutions can thus be understood as social technologies. We engineer them constantly, often without realising it. When neighbours organise to maintain a shared garden or playground, they appoint a small committee to manage funds and decisions. The arrangement works because it transforms the hard problem of coordinating dozens of contributors into the easier problem of trusting a few visible people who can be praised for diligence or blamed for misuse.
Like any tool, institutions cannot create what isn’t already there; they can only amplify existing cooperative capacity. Institutions rest on the conditions that make cooperation rational: material security and social capital. Where those conditions hold, reputation can work at scale. One layer of accountability supports the next, until cooperation extends far beyond the limits of familiarity. From the same force that binds vampire bats and coral reef fish, we have built cities, markets, and nations. Institutions are how trust is scaled to millions of strangers.
Eminently worth reading in full: “Guarding the Guardians,” from @jliep.bsky.social in @aeon.co.
Apposite (albeit a bit orthogonal): “Culture Is the Mass-Synchronization of Framings,” from @marco-giancotti.bsky.social.
* Benjamin Disraeli
###
As we get along, we might recall that it was on this date in 1938 that a film poking fun at a plethora of institutions, Howard Hawks’ comedy Bringing Up Baby, premiered at the Golden Gate Theater in San Francisco. Featuring Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, and a leopard, the film earned good reviews but suffered at the box office. Indeed, Hepburn’s career fell into a slump– she was one of a group of actors labeled as “box office poison” by the Independent Theatre Owners of America– that she broke with The Philadelphia Story (again with Grant) in 1940.
As for Bringing Up Baby, the film did well when re-released in the 1940s, and grew further in popularity when it began to be shown on television in the 1950s. Today it is recognized as the authentic screwball classic that it is; it sits at 94% on Rotten Tomatoes, and ranks among “Top 100” on lists from the American Film Institute and the National Society of Film Critics.
#BringingUpBaby #CaryGrant #cooperation #culture #film #history #HowardHawks #institutions #KatherineHepburn #movies #politics #reputation #socialCapital #socialInfrastructure #socialTechnology #society -
“Individuals may form communities, but only institutions can create a nation”*…
Traffic police in Rome, 1981.Good institutions are social technologies that scale trust from personal relations to entire nations. Game theorist and social scientist Julien Lie-Panis unpacks the extraordinary phenomenon of human cooperation to explain how– and why– institutions work…
Every human society, from the smallest village to the largest nation, faces the same fundamental challenge: how to get people to act in the interests of the collective rather than their own. Fishermen must limit their catch so fish stocks don’t collapse. People must respect others’ property and safety. Citizens must pay taxes to fund roads, schools and hospitals. Left to pure self-interest, no community could endure; the bonds of collective life would quickly unravel.
The solutions we’ve devised are remarkably similar across cultures and centuries. We create rules. Then we appoint guardians to enforce them. Those who break the rules are punished. But there’s a problem with this approach, one that the Roman poet Juvenal identified nearly 2,000 years ago: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guards themselves?
Fisheries appoint monitors to prevent overfishing – but what if the monitors accept bribes to look the other way? Police officers exist to protect everyone’s property and safety – but who ensures that they don’t abuse their power? Governments collect taxes for public services – but how do we stop officials from diverting the funds to their own accounts?
Every institution faces the same fundamental paradox. Institutions foster cooperation by rewarding good behaviour and punishing rule-breakers. Yet they themselves depend on cooperative members to function. We haven’t solved the cooperation problem – we’ve simply moved it back one step. So why do institutions work at all? To understand this puzzle, we need to first ask what makes human cooperation so extraordinary in the natural world…
[Lie-Panis explores human cooperation, and examines the ways in which, while it follows the same evolutionary rules as cooperation among other species, humans have expanded the ambit of their coordination. He explains the ways in which institutions depend on “a present-future trade-off,” on its constituents’ patience as it works through problems. And he illustrates the ways in which constituents’ concerns with material security and social capital can generate that patience. He concludes…]
… Institutions can thus be understood as social technologies. We engineer them constantly, often without realising it. When neighbours organise to maintain a shared garden or playground, they appoint a small committee to manage funds and decisions. The arrangement works because it transforms the hard problem of coordinating dozens of contributors into the easier problem of trusting a few visible people who can be praised for diligence or blamed for misuse.
Like any tool, institutions cannot create what isn’t already there; they can only amplify existing cooperative capacity. Institutions rest on the conditions that make cooperation rational: material security and social capital. Where those conditions hold, reputation can work at scale. One layer of accountability supports the next, until cooperation extends far beyond the limits of familiarity. From the same force that binds vampire bats and coral reef fish, we have built cities, markets, and nations. Institutions are how trust is scaled to millions of strangers.
Eminently worth reading in full: “Guarding the Guardians,” from @jliep.bsky.social in @aeon.co.
Apposite (albeit a bit orthogonal): “Culture Is the Mass-Synchronization of Framings,” from @marco-giancotti.bsky.social.
* Benjamin Disraeli
###
As we get along, we might recall that it was on this date in 1938 that a film poking fun at a plethora of institutions, Howard Hawks’ comedy Bringing Up Baby, premiered at the Golden Gate Theater in San Francisco. Featuring Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, and a leopard, the film earned good reviews but suffered at the box office. Indeed, Hepburn’s career fell into a slump– she was one of a group of actors labeled as “box office poison” by the Independent Theatre Owners of America– that she broke with The Philadelphia Story (again with Grant) in 1940.
As for Bringing Up Baby, the film did well when re-released in the 1940s, and grew further in popularity when it began to be shown on television in the 1950s. Today it is recognized as the authentic screwball classic that it is; it sits at 94% on Rotten Tomatoes, and ranks among “Top 100” on lists from the American Film Institute and the National Society of Film Critics.
#BringingUpBaby #CaryGrant #cooperation #culture #film #history #HowardHawks #institutions #KatherineHepburn #movies #politics #reputation #socialCapital #socialInfrastructure #socialTechnology #society -
“Individuals may form communities, but only institutions can create a nation”*…
Traffic police in Rome, 1981.Good institutions are social technologies that scale trust from personal relations to entire nations. Game theorist and social scientist Julien Lie-Panis unpacks the extraordinary phenomenon of human cooperation to explain how– and why– institutions work…
Every human society, from the smallest village to the largest nation, faces the same fundamental challenge: how to get people to act in the interests of the collective rather than their own. Fishermen must limit their catch so fish stocks don’t collapse. People must respect others’ property and safety. Citizens must pay taxes to fund roads, schools and hospitals. Left to pure self-interest, no community could endure; the bonds of collective life would quickly unravel.
The solutions we’ve devised are remarkably similar across cultures and centuries. We create rules. Then we appoint guardians to enforce them. Those who break the rules are punished. But there’s a problem with this approach, one that the Roman poet Juvenal identified nearly 2,000 years ago: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guards themselves?
Fisheries appoint monitors to prevent overfishing – but what if the monitors accept bribes to look the other way? Police officers exist to protect everyone’s property and safety – but who ensures that they don’t abuse their power? Governments collect taxes for public services – but how do we stop officials from diverting the funds to their own accounts?
Every institution faces the same fundamental paradox. Institutions foster cooperation by rewarding good behaviour and punishing rule-breakers. Yet they themselves depend on cooperative members to function. We haven’t solved the cooperation problem – we’ve simply moved it back one step. So why do institutions work at all? To understand this puzzle, we need to first ask what makes human cooperation so extraordinary in the natural world…
[Lie-Panis explores human cooperation, and examines the ways in which, while it follows the same evolutionary rules as cooperation among other species, humans have expanded the ambit of their coordination. He explains the ways in which institutions depend on “a present-future trade-off,” on its constituents’ patience as it works through problems. And he illustrates the ways in which constituents’ concerns with material security and social capital can generate that patience. He concludes…]
… Institutions can thus be understood as social technologies. We engineer them constantly, often without realising it. When neighbours organise to maintain a shared garden or playground, they appoint a small committee to manage funds and decisions. The arrangement works because it transforms the hard problem of coordinating dozens of contributors into the easier problem of trusting a few visible people who can be praised for diligence or blamed for misuse.
Like any tool, institutions cannot create what isn’t already there; they can only amplify existing cooperative capacity. Institutions rest on the conditions that make cooperation rational: material security and social capital. Where those conditions hold, reputation can work at scale. One layer of accountability supports the next, until cooperation extends far beyond the limits of familiarity. From the same force that binds vampire bats and coral reef fish, we have built cities, markets, and nations. Institutions are how trust is scaled to millions of strangers.
Eminently worth reading in full: “Guarding the Guardians,” from @jliep.bsky.social in @aeon.co.
Apposite (albeit a bit orthogonal): “Culture Is the Mass-Synchronization of Framings,” from @marco-giancotti.bsky.social.
* Benjamin Disraeli
###
As we get along, we might recall that it was on this date in 1938 that a film poking fun at a plethora of institutions, Howard Hawks’ comedy Bringing Up Baby, premiered at the Golden Gate Theater in San Francisco. Featuring Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, and a leopard, the film earned good reviews but suffered at the box office. Indeed, Hepburn’s career fell into a slump– she was one of a group of actors labeled as “box office poison” by the Independent Theatre Owners of America– that she broke with The Philadelphia Story (again with Grant) in 1940.
As for Bringing Up Baby, the film did well when re-released in the 1940s, and grew further in popularity when it began to be shown on television in the 1950s. Today it is recognized as the authentic screwball classic that it is; it sits at 94% on Rotten Tomatoes, and ranks among “Top 100” on lists from the American Film Institute and the National Society of Film Critics.
#BringingUpBaby #CaryGrant #cooperation #culture #film #history #HowardHawks #institutions #KatherineHepburn #movies #politics #reputation #socialCapital #socialInfrastructure #socialTechnology #society -
“Individuals may form communities, but only institutions can create a nation”*…
Traffic police in Rome, 1981.Good institutions are social technologies that scale trust from personal relations to entire nations. Game theorist and social scientist Julien Lie-Panis unpacks the extraordinary phenomenon of human cooperation to explain how– and why– institutions work…
Every human society, from the smallest village to the largest nation, faces the same fundamental challenge: how to get people to act in the interests of the collective rather than their own. Fishermen must limit their catch so fish stocks don’t collapse. People must respect others’ property and safety. Citizens must pay taxes to fund roads, schools and hospitals. Left to pure self-interest, no community could endure; the bonds of collective life would quickly unravel.
The solutions we’ve devised are remarkably similar across cultures and centuries. We create rules. Then we appoint guardians to enforce them. Those who break the rules are punished. But there’s a problem with this approach, one that the Roman poet Juvenal identified nearly 2,000 years ago: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guards themselves?
Fisheries appoint monitors to prevent overfishing – but what if the monitors accept bribes to look the other way? Police officers exist to protect everyone’s property and safety – but who ensures that they don’t abuse their power? Governments collect taxes for public services – but how do we stop officials from diverting the funds to their own accounts?
Every institution faces the same fundamental paradox. Institutions foster cooperation by rewarding good behaviour and punishing rule-breakers. Yet they themselves depend on cooperative members to function. We haven’t solved the cooperation problem – we’ve simply moved it back one step. So why do institutions work at all? To understand this puzzle, we need to first ask what makes human cooperation so extraordinary in the natural world…
[Lie-Panis explores human cooperation, and examines the ways in which, while it follows the same evolutionary rules as cooperation among other species, humans have expanded the ambit of their coordination. He explains the ways in which institutions depend on “a present-future trade-off,” on its constituents’ patience as it works through problems. And he illustrates the ways in which constituents’ concerns with material security and social capital can generate that patience. He concludes…]
… Institutions can thus be understood as social technologies. We engineer them constantly, often without realising it. When neighbours organise to maintain a shared garden or playground, they appoint a small committee to manage funds and decisions. The arrangement works because it transforms the hard problem of coordinating dozens of contributors into the easier problem of trusting a few visible people who can be praised for diligence or blamed for misuse.
Like any tool, institutions cannot create what isn’t already there; they can only amplify existing cooperative capacity. Institutions rest on the conditions that make cooperation rational: material security and social capital. Where those conditions hold, reputation can work at scale. One layer of accountability supports the next, until cooperation extends far beyond the limits of familiarity. From the same force that binds vampire bats and coral reef fish, we have built cities, markets, and nations. Institutions are how trust is scaled to millions of strangers.
Eminently worth reading in full: “Guarding the Guardians,” from @jliep.bsky.social in @aeon.co.
Apposite (albeit a bit orthogonal): “Culture Is the Mass-Synchronization of Framings,” from @marco-giancotti.bsky.social.
* Benjamin Disraeli
###
As we get along, we might recall that it was on this date in 1938 that a film poking fun at a plethora of institutions, Howard Hawks’ comedy Bringing Up Baby, premiered at the Golden Gate Theater in San Francisco. Featuring Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, and a leopard, the film earned good reviews but suffered at the box office. Indeed, Hepburn’s career fell into a slump– she was one of a group of actors labeled as “box office poison” by the Independent Theatre Owners of America– that she broke with The Philadelphia Story (again with Grant) in 1940.
As for Bringing Up Baby, the film did well when re-released in the 1940s, and grew further in popularity when it began to be shown on television in the 1950s. Today it is recognized as the authentic screwball classic that it is; it sits at 94% on Rotten Tomatoes, and ranks among “Top 100” on lists from the American Film Institute and the National Society of Film Critics.
#BringingUpBaby #CaryGrant #cooperation #culture #film #history #HowardHawks #institutions #KatherineHepburn #movies #politics #reputation #socialCapital #socialInfrastructure #socialTechnology #society -
#IllanKlassikko on #HowardHawks'in ohjaus, ja siinä esiintyvät mm. #CaryGrant, #GingerRogers ja #MarilynMonroe. #elokuvat #komedia #screwball
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044916/ -
#IllanKlassikko on #HowardHawks'in ohjaus, ja siinä esiintyvät mm. #CaryGrant, #GingerRogers ja #MarilynMonroe. #elokuvat #komedia #screwball
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044916/ -
#IllanKlassikko on #HowardHawks'in ohjaus, ja siinä esiintyvät mm. #CaryGrant, #GingerRogers ja #MarilynMonroe. #elokuvat #komedia #screwball
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044916/ -
#IllanKlassikko on #HowardHawks'in ohjaus, ja siinä esiintyvät mm. #CaryGrant, #GingerRogers ja #MarilynMonroe. #elokuvat #komedia #screwball
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044916/ -
#IllanKlassikko on #HowardHawks'in ohjaus, ja siinä esiintyvät mm. #CaryGrant, #GingerRogers ja #MarilynMonroe. #elokuvat #komedia #screwball
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044916/ -
LA OPINION DE CARY GRANT SOBRE LA MEJOR ACTRIZ CON LA QUE TRABAJO.
Cary Grant fue muchas cosas a la vez: el gran caballero de la comedia clásica, un prodigio del tempo cómico, un actor capaz de sostener el romanticismo más sofisticado sin perder nunca la ironía. Elegante hasta la médula, enigmático por naturaleza y dueño de una fotogenia irrepetible, construyó una carrera tan extensa como…
https://nuevoimagenesdeactualidad.blogspot.com/2026/01/la-opinion-de-cary-grant-sobre-la-mejor.html
#cine #cinema #katharinehepburn #carygrant #gracekelly -
Dagli acrobati di strada ai red carpet, passando per l'LSD. 💊
La vita di Cary Grant è stata la sua interpretazione più complessa. Oggi parliamo di come Archibald Leach ha inventato il divo perfetto per sopravvivere al dolore di una madre scomparsa.
Scopri i segreti, l'avarizia e la rinascita spirituale di un'icona immortale.
Il nuovo episodio è online:
https://open.spotify.com/show/7GOEHMtNjhyanZIWYNlxi1 -
EL DRAMA QUE SUFRIO CARY GRANT EN SUS PROPIAS CARNES CUANDO ERA YA TODA UNA ESTRELLA DE CINE.
Durante décadas, Cary Grant fue la definición misma del glamour. No solo el hombre mejor vestido del cine clásico, sino también el gran arquitecto de una comedia elegante, afilada y sofisticada, donde el ingenio era un ..CLICKA EN EL ENLACE PARA SEGUIR LEYENDO
https://nuevoimagenesdeactualidad.blogspot.com/2025/12/el-drama-que-sufrio-cary-grant-en-sus.html
#cine #cinema #carygrant -
🍿North by Northwest (1959) was the fourth and last collaboration between Alfred Hitchcock and star Cary Grant. It’s an epic espionage caper foreshadowing the James Bond movie franchise, which tackles some of the recurring themes in the director’s work - including the relentless pursuit of an innocent man. #hitchcock #alfredhitchcock #movies #films #carygrant
-
🍿North by Northwest (1959) was the fourth and last collaboration between Alfred Hitchcock and star Cary Grant. It’s an epic espionage caper foreshadowing the James Bond movie franchise, which tackles some of the recurring themes in the director’s work - including the relentless pursuit of an innocent man. #hitchcock #alfredhitchcock #movies #films #carygrant
-
🍿North by Northwest (1959) was the fourth and last collaboration between Alfred Hitchcock and star Cary Grant. It’s an epic espionage caper foreshadowing the James Bond movie franchise, which tackles some of the recurring themes in the director’s work - including the relentless pursuit of an innocent man. #hitchcock #alfredhitchcock #movies #films #carygrant
