home.social

#carbonnanotubes — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #carbonnanotubes, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. with a DIY paint job of a car in your garage, you can't go wrong switching colors to Vanta Black.

    (unless you care about autonomous taxis or LiDAR or camera-assisted driving or Tesla autodrivers)

    #CarbonNanotubes #Reflections

  2. with a DIY paint job of a car in your garage, you can't go wrong switching colors to Vanta Black.

    (unless you care about autonomous taxis or LiDAR or camera-assisted driving or Tesla autodrivers)

    #CarbonNanotubes #Reflections

  3. In 2004, Japanese engineers proposed a mile-high pyramid over Tokyo Bay, 14 times taller than the Great Pyramid, meant to house a million people, a mega-city we still cannot build

    Imagine riding an elevator inside your own apartment building, going straight up through a pyramid so tall it…
    #EuropeSays #Japan #JP #Tokyo #architecturalmegaprojects #carbonnanotubes #ShimizuCorporation #TokyoMega-CityPyramid #urbanspacesolutions
    europesays.com/japan/61277/

  4. European Growth Stocks With High Insider Ownership

    As European markets navigate a period of uncertainty, marked by mixed economic signals and geopolitical tensions, investors are…
    #Europe #EU #carbonnanotubes #EarningsGrowth #European #Europeanmarkets #growthcompanies #insiderownership #revenuegrowth
    europesays.com/europe/68087/

  5. China discovers naturally occurring carbon nanotubes in lunar soil

    Researchers from Jilin University identified single-walled carbon nanotubes in soil samples brought back from the far side of…
    #NewsBeep #News #Science #carbonnanotubes #Chang’e-6mission #China #GB #moon #single-walledcarbonnanotubes #Space #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/386970/

  6. China discovers naturally occurring carbon nanotubes in lunar soil

    Researchers from Jilin University identified single-walled carbon nanotubes in soil samples brought back from the far side of…
    #NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Science #carbonnanotubes #Chang'e-6mission #China #Moon #single-walledcarbonnanotubes #Space
    newsbeep.com/us/425730/

  7. Carbon Nanotubes Market 2023–2031

    The global carbon nanotubes market is projected to grow from US$ 6.45B in 2023 to US$ 18.01B by 2031 (CAGR 13.7%). Growth is driven by energy storage, electronics, structural composites, aerospace, and medical applications.

    Get Sample Report- theinsightpartners.com/reports

    #CarbonNanotubes #Nanotechnology #MarketTrends #AdvancedMaterials #EnergyStorage #3DPrinting #Aerospace #Healthcare

  8. Carbon Nanotubes Market 2023–2031

    The global carbon nanotubes market is projected to grow from US$ 6.45B in 2023 to US$ 18.01B by 2031 (CAGR 13.7%). Growth is driven by energy storage, electronics, structural composites, aerospace, and medical applications.

    Get Sample Report- theinsightpartners.com/reports

    #CarbonNanotubes #Nanotechnology #MarketTrends #AdvancedMaterials #EnergyStorage #3DPrinting #Aerospace #Healthcare

  9. Carbon Nanotubes Market 2023–2031

    The global carbon nanotubes market is projected to grow from US$ 6.45B in 2023 to US$ 18.01B by 2031 (CAGR 13.7%). Growth is driven by energy storage, electronics, structural composites, aerospace, and medical applications.

    Get Sample Report- theinsightpartners.com/reports

    #CarbonNanotubes #Nanotechnology #MarketTrends #AdvancedMaterials #EnergyStorage #3DPrinting #Aerospace #Healthcare

  10. Carbon Nanotubes Market 2023–2031

    The global carbon nanotubes market is projected to grow from US$ 6.45B in 2023 to US$ 18.01B by 2031 (CAGR 13.7%). Growth is driven by energy storage, electronics, structural composites, aerospace, and medical applications.

    Get Sample Report- theinsightpartners.com/reports

    #CarbonNanotubes #Nanotechnology #MarketTrends #AdvancedMaterials #EnergyStorage #3DPrinting #Aerospace #Healthcare

  11. phys.org/news/2025-12-reactor-

    (where's the catch?)

    "…for every 4 kilograms of #methane the system successfully converts into useful resources, it makes 3 kilograms of #carbonnanotubes and 1 kilogram of #hydrogen.

    Not only would this process produce stronger, more #sustainablematerials for the #construction industry, but it would also provide plenty of clean fuel for our #energy needs."

  12. phys.org/news/2025-12-reactor-

    (where's the catch?)

    "…for every 4 kilograms of #methane the system successfully converts into useful resources, it makes 3 kilograms of #carbonnanotubes and 1 kilogram of #hydrogen.

    Not only would this process produce stronger, more #sustainablematerials for the #construction industry, but it would also provide plenty of clean fuel for our #energy needs."

  13. phys.org/news/2025-12-reactor-

    (where's the catch?)

    "…for every 4 kilograms of #methane the system successfully converts into useful resources, it makes 3 kilograms of #carbonnanotubes and 1 kilogram of #hydrogen.

    Not only would this process produce stronger, more #sustainablematerials for the #construction industry, but it would also provide plenty of clean fuel for our #energy needs."

  14. phys.org/news/2025-12-reactor-

    (where's the catch?)

    "…for every 4 kilograms of #methane the system successfully converts into useful resources, it makes 3 kilograms of #carbonnanotubes and 1 kilogram of #hydrogen.

    Not only would this process produce stronger, more #sustainablematerials for the #construction industry, but it would also provide plenty of clean fuel for our #energy needs."

  15. @jexner @sundogplanets

    Sorry for the delay in replying! Let’s be clear upfront: we can’t build a fully operational space elevator with today’s technology.

    But history shows us that what seems impossible today can become reality tomorrow. When President John F. Kennedy set the goal of landing a man on the Moon in 1961, many thought it was a pipe dream. Yet less than a decade later, the Apollo program succeeded, proving that with determination, innovation, and investment, the impossible can be achieved. So, while ambitious, a space elevator is a plausible future project.

    Trying to be as objective as I can, here’s a more nuanced take on feasibility — starting with economics. A space elevator would be expensive; estimates vary, but it’s safe to say it would be a multi-billion-dollar project. To put that in perspective: SoFi Stadium cost $4.9 billion, and the Apollo program cost about $203 billion (adjusted to 2015 dollars). Expert analyses estimate the cost of the first space elevator between $6 billion and $100 billion depending on design and infrastructure included. So financially, it’s ambitious but plausible, especially as a long-term infrastructure investment with transformative potential for space access and sustainable resource use.

    The technical challenges are immense, but so are those of every large, unprecedented undertaking. Picture a tether anchored to a mobile ocean platform, gently swaying with the waves, while robotic climbers ascend and descend, carrying cargo and passengers to the stars.

    Several organizations, including the International Space Elevator Consortium, are actively developing the technologies and infrastructure needed. While we’re far from the finish line, the potential benefits—significantly reduced launch costs, increased space access, and large-scale space-based solar power—are exciting.

    A key technical hurdle is finding a material with sufficient tensile strength. Though it might sound counterintuitive, a space elevator is more like a suspension bridge to space than a giant tower. The concept evolved from building “bottom-up” to a “top-down” approach, where a geostationary satellite deploys a cable down to Earth. Currently, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) are leading candidates for tether materials. For example, Shizuoka University in Japan is prototyping and testing high-tensile-strength materials in space. The key issues remain: producing suitable materials like carbon nanotubes at scale.

    In conclusion, while we can’t build a fully operational space elevator today, overcoming the technical difficulties in the near future is possible. With continued advances in materials science, engineering, and technology, we may soon see the space elevator shift from futuristic fantasy to game-changing reality.

    I’m no space engineering expert, so I welcome corrections and insights.
    ---

    References & Further Reading
    - Edwards, Bradley C. “The Space Elevator.” nss.org/wp-content/uploads/201
    - Gao, Tianrui. “The Feasibility Analysis of a Space Elevator.” ijetch.org/2024/IJET-V16N4-129
    - International Space Elevator Consortium — Annual Studies isec.org/studies/#ApexAnchor

    Recommended Videos
    - Space Elevators: Strategies & Status — youtu.be/V0ju74IqW0A
    - Clean Energy From Space? — youtu.be/iNqCAvL1T1Y
    - Asteroid Mining — youtu.be/3-3DjxhGaUg
    - Everyone is Wrong About Asteroid Mining — youtu.be/p3hlnL2JN8E

    CC: @cy @isecdotorg @sorceressofmathematics @goodmirek @tiotasram @Ifrauding @Elrick_Winter @tiotasram @davidtheeviloverlord

    #SpaceElevator #FutureTech #SpaceExploration #Innovation #ScienceFiction #Engineering #SpaceTravel #CarbonNanotubes #UHMWPE #FeasibilityStudy #SpaceAccess #SustainableTech #SpaceResearch #SpaceEngineering
    #SpaceTechnology #SpaceEconomics #SpaceInnovation #SpaceDevelopment
    #megaprojects #SpaceTower #Megastructure

  16. @jexner @sundogplanets

    Sorry for the delay in replying! Let’s be clear upfront: we can’t build a fully operational space elevator with today’s technology.

    But history shows us that what seems impossible today can become reality tomorrow. When President John F. Kennedy set the goal of landing a man on the Moon in 1961, many thought it was a pipe dream. Yet less than a decade later, the Apollo program succeeded, proving that with determination, innovation, and investment, the impossible can be achieved. So, while ambitious, a space elevator is a plausible future project.

    Trying to be as objective as I can, here’s a more nuanced take on feasibility — starting with economics. A space elevator would be expensive; estimates vary, but it’s safe to say it would be a multi-billion-dollar project. To put that in perspective: SoFi Stadium cost $4.9 billion, and the Apollo program cost about $203 billion (adjusted to 2015 dollars). Expert analyses estimate the cost of the first space elevator between $6 billion and $100 billion depending on design and infrastructure included. So financially, it’s ambitious but plausible, especially as a long-term infrastructure investment with transformative potential for space access and sustainable resource use.

    The technical challenges are immense, but so are those of every large, unprecedented undertaking. Picture a tether anchored to a mobile ocean platform, gently swaying with the waves, while robotic climbers ascend and descend, carrying cargo and passengers to the stars.

    Several organizations, including the International Space Elevator Consortium, are actively developing the technologies and infrastructure needed. While we’re far from the finish line, the potential benefits—significantly reduced launch costs, increased space access, and large-scale space-based solar power—are exciting.

    A key technical hurdle is finding a material with sufficient tensile strength. Though it might sound counterintuitive, a space elevator is more like a suspension bridge to space than a giant tower. The concept evolved from building “bottom-up” to a “top-down” approach, where a geostationary satellite deploys a cable down to Earth. Currently, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) are leading candidates for tether materials. For example, Shizuoka University in Japan is prototyping and testing high-tensile-strength materials in space. The key issues remain: producing suitable materials like carbon nanotubes at scale.

    In conclusion, while we can’t build a fully operational space elevator today, overcoming the technical difficulties in the near future is possible. With continued advances in materials science, engineering, and technology, we may soon see the space elevator shift from futuristic fantasy to game-changing reality.

    I’m no space engineering expert, so I welcome corrections and insights.
    ---

    References & Further Reading
    - Edwards, Bradley C. “The Space Elevator.” nss.org/wp-content/uploads/201
    - Gao, Tianrui. “The Feasibility Analysis of a Space Elevator.” ijetch.org/2024/IJET-V16N4-129
    - International Space Elevator Consortium — Annual Studies isec.org/studies/#ApexAnchor

    Recommended Videos
    - Space Elevators: Strategies & Status — youtu.be/V0ju74IqW0A
    - Clean Energy From Space? — youtu.be/iNqCAvL1T1Y
    - Asteroid Mining — youtu.be/3-3DjxhGaUg
    - Everyone is Wrong About Asteroid Mining — youtu.be/p3hlnL2JN8E

    CC: @cy @isecdotorg @sorceressofmathematics @goodmirek @tiotasram @Ifrauding @Elrick_Winter @tiotasram @davidtheeviloverlord

    #SpaceElevator #FutureTech #SpaceExploration #Innovation #ScienceFiction #Engineering #SpaceTravel #CarbonNanotubes #UHMWPE #FeasibilityStudy #SpaceAccess #SustainableTech #SpaceResearch #SpaceEngineering
    #SpaceTechnology #SpaceEconomics #SpaceInnovation #SpaceDevelopment
    #megaprojects #SpaceTower #Megastructure

  17. @jexner @sundogplanets

    Sorry for the delay in replying! Let’s be clear upfront: we can’t build a fully operational space elevator with today’s technology.

    But history shows us that what seems impossible today can become reality tomorrow. When President John F. Kennedy set the goal of landing a man on the Moon in 1961, many thought it was a pipe dream. Yet less than a decade later, the Apollo program succeeded, proving that with determination, innovation, and investment, the impossible can be achieved. So, while ambitious, a space elevator is a plausible future project.

    Trying to be as objective as I can, here’s a more nuanced take on feasibility — starting with economics. A space elevator would be expensive; estimates vary, but it’s safe to say it would be a multi-billion-dollar project. To put that in perspective: SoFi Stadium cost $4.9 billion, and the Apollo program cost about $203 billion (adjusted to 2015 dollars). Expert analyses estimate the cost of the first space elevator between $6 billion and $100 billion depending on design and infrastructure included. So financially, it’s ambitious but plausible, especially as a long-term infrastructure investment with transformative potential for space access and sustainable resource use.

    The technical challenges are immense, but so are those of every large, unprecedented undertaking. Picture a tether anchored to a mobile ocean platform, gently swaying with the waves, while robotic climbers ascend and descend, carrying cargo and passengers to the stars.

    Several organizations, including the International Space Elevator Consortium, are actively developing the technologies and infrastructure needed. While we’re far from the finish line, the potential benefits—significantly reduced launch costs, increased space access, and large-scale space-based solar power—are exciting.

    A key technical hurdle is finding a material with sufficient tensile strength. Though it might sound counterintuitive, a space elevator is more like a suspension bridge to space than a giant tower. The concept evolved from building “bottom-up” to a “top-down” approach, where a geostationary satellite deploys a cable down to Earth. Currently, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) are leading candidates for tether materials. For example, Shizuoka University in Japan is prototyping and testing high-tensile-strength materials in space. The key issues remain: producing suitable materials like carbon nanotubes at scale.

    In conclusion, while we can’t build a fully operational space elevator today, overcoming the technical difficulties in the near future is possible. With continued advances in materials science, engineering, and technology, we may soon see the space elevator shift from futuristic fantasy to game-changing reality.

    I’m no space engineering expert, so I welcome corrections and insights.
    ---

    References & Further Reading
    - Edwards, Bradley C. “The Space Elevator.” nss.org/wp-content/uploads/201
    - Gao, Tianrui. “The Feasibility Analysis of a Space Elevator.” ijetch.org/2024/IJET-V16N4-129
    - International Space Elevator Consortium — Annual Studies isec.org/studies/#ApexAnchor

    Recommended Videos
    - Space Elevators: Strategies & Status — youtu.be/V0ju74IqW0A
    - Clean Energy From Space? — youtu.be/iNqCAvL1T1Y
    - Asteroid Mining — youtu.be/3-3DjxhGaUg
    - Everyone is Wrong About Asteroid Mining — youtu.be/p3hlnL2JN8E

    CC: @cy @isecdotorg @sorceressofmathematics @goodmirek @tiotasram @Ifrauding @Elrick_Winter @tiotasram @davidtheeviloverlord

    #SpaceElevator #FutureTech #SpaceExploration #Innovation #ScienceFiction #Engineering #SpaceTravel #CarbonNanotubes #UHMWPE #FeasibilityStudy #SpaceAccess #SustainableTech #SpaceResearch #SpaceEngineering
    #SpaceTechnology #SpaceEconomics #SpaceInnovation #SpaceDevelopment
    #megaprojects #SpaceTower #Megastructure

  18. @jexner @sundogplanets

    Sorry for the delay in replying! Let’s be clear upfront: we can’t build a fully operational space elevator with today’s technology.

    But history shows us that what seems impossible today can become reality tomorrow. When President John F. Kennedy set the goal of landing a man on the Moon in 1961, many thought it was a pipe dream. Yet less than a decade later, the Apollo program succeeded, proving that with determination, innovation, and investment, the impossible can be achieved. So, while ambitious, a space elevator is a plausible future project.

    Trying to be as objective as I can, here’s a more nuanced take on feasibility — starting with economics. A space elevator would be expensive; estimates vary, but it’s safe to say it would be a multi-billion-dollar project. To put that in perspective: SoFi Stadium cost $4.9 billion, and the Apollo program cost about $203 billion (adjusted to 2015 dollars). Expert analyses estimate the cost of the first space elevator between $6 billion and $100 billion depending on design and infrastructure included. So financially, it’s ambitious but plausible, especially as a long-term infrastructure investment with transformative potential for space access and sustainable resource use.

    The technical challenges are immense, but so are those of every large, unprecedented undertaking. Picture a tether anchored to a mobile ocean platform, gently swaying with the waves, while robotic climbers ascend and descend, carrying cargo and passengers to the stars.

    Several organizations, including the International Space Elevator Consortium, are actively developing the technologies and infrastructure needed. While we’re far from the finish line, the potential benefits—significantly reduced launch costs, increased space access, and large-scale space-based solar power—are exciting.

    A key technical hurdle is finding a material with sufficient tensile strength. Though it might sound counterintuitive, a space elevator is more like a suspension bridge to space than a giant tower. The concept evolved from building “bottom-up” to a “top-down” approach, where a geostationary satellite deploys a cable down to Earth. Currently, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) are leading candidates for tether materials. For example, Shizuoka University in Japan is prototyping and testing high-tensile-strength materials in space. The key issues remain: producing suitable materials like carbon nanotubes at scale.

    In conclusion, while we can’t build a fully operational space elevator today, overcoming the technical difficulties in the near future is possible. With continued advances in materials science, engineering, and technology, we may soon see the space elevator shift from futuristic fantasy to game-changing reality.

    I’m no space engineering expert, so I welcome corrections and insights.
    ---

    References & Further Reading
    - Edwards, Bradley C. “The Space Elevator.” nss.org/wp-content/uploads/201
    - Gao, Tianrui. “The Feasibility Analysis of a Space Elevator.” ijetch.org/2024/IJET-V16N4-129
    - International Space Elevator Consortium — Annual Studies isec.org/studies/#ApexAnchor

    Recommended Videos
    - Space Elevators: Strategies & Status — youtu.be/V0ju74IqW0A
    - Clean Energy From Space? — youtu.be/iNqCAvL1T1Y
    - Asteroid Mining — youtu.be/3-3DjxhGaUg
    - Everyone is Wrong About Asteroid Mining — youtu.be/p3hlnL2JN8E

    CC: @cy @isecdotorg @sorceressofmathematics @goodmirek @tiotasram @Ifrauding @Elrick_Winter @tiotasram @davidtheeviloverlord

    #SpaceElevator #FutureTech #SpaceExploration #Innovation #ScienceFiction #Engineering #SpaceTravel #CarbonNanotubes #UHMWPE #FeasibilityStudy #SpaceAccess #SustainableTech #SpaceResearch #SpaceEngineering
    #SpaceTechnology #SpaceEconomics #SpaceInnovation #SpaceDevelopment
    #megaprojects #SpaceTower #Megastructure

  19. Ah, the classic tale of the groundbreaking, world-saving carbon nanotube gizmo that requires #JavaScript and #cookies just to read the abstract 🤔. Because who doesn’t want their cutting-edge science served with a side of browser settings tutorials? 🌐🔧
    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 #carbonnanotubes #technews #sciencehumor #browsercompatibility #HackerNews #ngated

  20. Ah, the classic tale of the groundbreaking, world-saving carbon nanotube gizmo that requires #JavaScript and #cookies just to read the abstract 🤔. Because who doesn’t want their cutting-edge science served with a side of browser settings tutorials? 🌐🔧
    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 #carbonnanotubes #technews #sciencehumor #browsercompatibility #HackerNews #ngated

  21. Ah, the classic tale of the groundbreaking, world-saving carbon nanotube gizmo that requires #JavaScript and #cookies just to read the abstract 🤔. Because who doesn’t want their cutting-edge science served with a side of browser settings tutorials? 🌐🔧
    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 #carbonnanotubes #technews #sciencehumor #browsercompatibility #HackerNews #ngated

  22. Ah, the classic tale of the groundbreaking, world-saving carbon nanotube gizmo that requires #JavaScript and #cookies just to read the abstract 🤔. Because who doesn’t want their cutting-edge science served with a side of browser settings tutorials? 🌐🔧
    onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 #carbonnanotubes #technews #sciencehumor #browsercompatibility #HackerNews #ngated

  23. Using Microwave Heating to Locally Anneal CNT-Coated FDM Prints - The CNT coating between the layers is heated with microwaves to locally anneal. (C... - hackaday.com/2025/02/01/using- #carbonnanotubes #3dprinterhacks #annealing #fdm

  24. Using Microwave Heating to Locally Anneal CNT-Coated FDM Prints - The CNT coating between the layers is heated with microwaves to locally anneal. (C... - hackaday.com/2025/02/01/using- #carbonnanotubes #3dprinterhacks #annealing #fdm

  25. Using Microwave Heating to Locally Anneal CNT-Coated FDM Prints - The CNT coating between the layers is heated with microwaves to locally anneal. (C... - hackaday.com/2025/02/01/using- #carbonnanotubes #3dprinterhacks #annealing #fdm

  26. Using Microwave Heating to Locally Anneal CNT-Coated FDM Prints - The CNT coating between the layers is heated with microwaves to locally anneal. (C... - hackaday.com/2025/02/01/using- #carbonnanotubes #3dprinterhacks #annealing #fdm

  27. New Largest [n]Cycloparaphenylene Acetylene

    Novel macrocycle shows bright turquoise fluorescence with a high quantum yield; might be a useful carbon nanotube precursor

    chemistryviews.org/new-largest

    #carbonnanotubes #cppas #chemistry #chemistryviews #chemviews

  28. New Largest [n]Cycloparaphenylene Acetylene

    Novel macrocycle shows bright turquoise fluorescence with a high quantum yield; might be a useful carbon nanotube precursor

    chemistryviews.org/new-largest

    #carbonnanotubes #cppas #chemistry #chemistryviews #chemviews

  29. New Largest [n]Cycloparaphenylene Acetylene

    Novel macrocycle shows bright turquoise fluorescence with a high quantum yield; might be a useful carbon nanotube precursor

    chemistryviews.org/new-largest

    #carbonnanotubes #cppas #chemistry #chemistryviews #chemviews

  30. New Largest [n]Cycloparaphenylene Acetylene

    Novel macrocycle shows bright turquoise fluorescence with a high quantum yield; might be a useful carbon nanotube precursor

    chemistryviews.org/new-largest

    #carbonnanotubes #cppas #chemistry #chemistryviews #chemviews

  31. Carbon nanotube electronic devices are rapidly progressing. Leveraging low device-to-device variability, the authors demonstrate their use as biosensors for point-of-care testing.
    "Mass Production of Carbon Nanotube Transistor Biosensors for Point-of-Care Tests"
    dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolet
    #CarbonNanotubes #SWCNTs #Biosensors #PointOfCare #Nano #Science

  32. Carbon nanotube electronic devices are rapidly progressing. Leveraging low device-to-device variability, the authors demonstrate their use as biosensors for point-of-care testing.
    "Mass Production of Carbon Nanotube Transistor Biosensors for Point-of-Care Tests"
    dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolet
    #CarbonNanotubes #SWCNTs #Biosensors #PointOfCare #Nano #Science

  33. “We are building the Rajnikanth of all materials” 😂
    kidding aside, this is batshit insane stuff! it could rank among the top humanity saviours, i think. #CarbonNanoTubes
    theprint.in/features/100-times

  34. “We are building the Rajnikanth of all materials” 😂
    kidding aside, this is batshit insane stuff! it could rank among the top humanity saviours, i think.
    theprint.in/features/100-times

  35. @razimantv
    Raziman also took into account that #excitons interact with each other through exciton-exciton annihilation, which normally decreases light emission at high intensities.

    So he generalized the theory of Purcell enhancement to be more precise for a range of excitonic materials like #2DSemiconductors, #perovskites, #OrganicCrystals or #CarbonNanotubes.

    #nanophotonics #FluorescenceFriday

  36. @razimantv
    Raziman also took into account that #excitons interact with each other through exciton-exciton annihilation, which normally decreases light emission at high intensities.

    So he generalized the theory of Purcell enhancement to be more precise for a range of excitonic materials like #2DSemiconductors, #perovskites, #OrganicCrystals or #CarbonNanotubes.

    #nanophotonics #FluorescenceFriday

  37. @razimantv
    Raziman also took into account that interact with each other through exciton-exciton annihilation, which normally decreases light emission at high intensities.

    So he generalized the theory of Purcell enhancement to be more precise for a range of excitonic materials like , , or .

  38. The Coming Copper Shortage: Aluminium or Carbon Nanotubes to the Rescue? - The use of aluminium in wiring is unlikely to bring a smile to the face of anyone ... - hackaday.com/2021/09/30/the-co #copper-coatedaluminium #carbonnanotubes #currentevents #featured #science #cntwire #copper #cca