home.social

#boudica — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #boudica, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. You Know My Name, But Do You Really Know Me?

    For my last post in this series, I decided to cover two heroines who you may have heard of; you may even think you know about them. But do you? One of these women is a historically documented warrior, while the other’s existence has not been established. While it would be far more interesting if these ladies had encountered each other in battle, one lived in the first century while the other lived in the 12-13th century. So, who are these ladies? Boudica and Lagertha, of course. You may have guessed that from the AI image.

    So which one actually existed and which one are we unsure of? Boudica has been historically documented while Lagertha’s existence has never been confirmed via archeology or other historical record. We know about Boudica by virtue of the written record from two Roman historians—Tacitus, who wrote in the late first century/early second century, and Cassius Dio who wrote in the third century. On the other hand, the stories of Viking Shield Maiden Lagertha (also known as Lathgertha, Ladgerda or Lathgertha) come from the Saxo Grammaticus’ Gesta Danorum (Deeds of the Danes) which was written between the 12-13th century. Scholars, according to World History Encyclopedia, consider the early Saxon histories to be fictionalized. The History Channel’s series Vikings made Lagertha a household name in spite of her questionable authenticity. Nevertheless, it is likely that a shield maiden like Lagertha existed and makes a comparison to Boudica interesting.

    Boudica, as I have stated above, lived during the first century CE in eastern Britannia in the area of Norfolk. She was the queen of the Iceni tribe. The Iceni were a British Celtic-speaking people who were not necessarily a single, extended family group, but rather a large tribal community made up of numerous local groups and settlements. A terrific series called Britannia on Prime Video presents this period of time and similar Celtic tribes. Roman historians spoke of them as the Icenci and the Eceni. They were known to be prosperous having good soil for agriculture and access to the North Sea for trade with Europe. They were not considered primitive for the time period. They were known for sophisticated metalworking and long-distance trade routes. One of the most significant pieces of evidence of the Iceni was the Snettisham Hoard which was discovered in Norfolk. These treasures included gold and silver torcs, jewelry, coins, ingots and other decorated metalworks. In spite of this, however, their economy was primarily agricultural. They raised wheat, barley, cattle, sheep, pigs, and horses.

    The Icenci had an organized political structure prior to the Roman occupation of Britain. They also coined their own money. Boudica came to power after the death of her husband King Prasutagus. He is described as more of a “client” king—a local ruler who governed his people while recognizing Roman supremacy; however, that relationship broke down. One of the fascinating characteristics of the Iceni people was that women were allowed to possess significant wealth and status which is reflected in the graves discovered in the area of Norfolk. While not being a matriarchal community, women were allowed to own property and political power, like Boudica. Unfortunately, the Roman invasion of 43 CE under the leadership of Claudius would change the Iceni.

    As we have noted, the Iceni initially cooperated with Rome, but that relationship broke down following the death of Prasutagus. At the time of his death, he provided for the transfer of his wealth to be divided between his two daughters and Rome. However, Rome was not happy with that arrangement. According to Tacitus, Roman leaders seized the wealth and property of the Iceni, publically beat Boudica, and assaulted her daughters. The Iceni, lead by Boudica, revolted. They were joined by other tribes like the Trinovantes which was based in the area of modern day Essex and Colchester. Boudica and her forces destroyed the Camulodunum, Londinium, and the Verulamium through fighting and fire. Evidence of these battles has been found around Colchester, London, and St. Albans. Destruction was so severe that archaeologists have termed the rebellion the “Boudican Destruction Horizon”.

    Despite their initial success against Roman forces, the Iceni people were ultimately defeated by Suetonius Paulinus. Boudica would die soon after this. According to Tacitus, Boudica committed suicide by poisoning; Dio, on the other hand, claims that she died due to illness. The region once controlled by the Iceni was brought firmly into the Roman provincial system. Eventually their identity disappeared being assimilated into Anglo-Saxon Britain. Boudica was more than a warrior woman who took on the enemy; she was a symbol of the people she represented; a group of people who were more developed technically, wealthy, and politically sophisticated than many tribes of the day. However, Boudica was not an outlier in her community; the community produced other women like her. We know about her because she was a queen who faced Rome head on.

    How does Lagertha compare to Boudica? According to legend, Lagertha would have lived in nineth century Norway. Like Britain, Norway was not yet a unified country. Additionally, women were not “subordinate housewives”. They could possess wealth and political power within a traditional, patriarchal society. Men and women in Norway had different social roles, but historical evidence reflects wealthy and powerful people of both sexes. Marriage was a family and economic alliance. The woman’s family negotiated the marriage and it typically joined together two kin groups, though women were not distanced from their own families. Women often brought substantial wealth and property into marriages. In many cases, she could retain ownership of the property she brought into the marriage. This is quite different from European marital traditions. Moreover, women could divorce their husbands under certain circumstances like abuse, neglect, or insults towards her or her family.

    In Norwegian culture, the center of power was within the household, and the farm was the key economic unit. They did not look at this circumstance as women doing women’s work and men doing men’s work. Women managed the critical economic operation. While the men were out raiding and trading, women were producing textiles, tending to livestock, managing household resources, producing and preserving food, caring for their children, and much more. Archaeologists have discovered large numbers of graves of Viking women that contained keys, a symbol of household authority.

    A prime example of how Norwegian wealthy women could possess great power is contained in the Oseberg burial site which dates to around 834 CE. In this burial site, archaeologists discovered two women buried in an enormous ship along with a wagon, sledges, beds, chests, textiles, household equipment, elaborate carvings, animals, as well as the ship itself. While we do not know who these women were, it is evident that they were of high status. There is also archaeological evidence of women being buried with weapons like swords, axes, spears, and arrowheads. This is not to say that Norwegian culture was to be admired; the culture possessed dark aspects which negatively affected women. Specifically, women could be captured in battle, enslaved, sexually abused, sold, or killed in circumstances we would find reprehensible.

    So what does this tell us about our character Lagertha? Saxo had similar women upon which to create Lagertha. She embodied the independent, wealthy, politically influential and, sometimes, physically imposing Viking woman and then he pushes it to the extreme. Lagertha does it all and then some. She doesn’t just have influence inside her home; she becomes a ruler and commands warriors; ultimately killing the man who stood between her and political independence.

    Boudica and Lagertha could not have existed if not for the liberal, cultural ideals and practices of their communities. Boudica and the Iceni could have set the course for the women of Scandinavia having ten to eleven centuries between them. The comparison is quite compelling and inspiring. While other societies treated women as property to be controlled and of lower intellectual abilities, both of these societies provided, if not encouraged, women to participate in similar activities as men.

    I hope you have enjoyed these posts about influential women of antiquity. I have greatly enjoyed writing about them. I am now considering what my next series will be about. If you have any ideas, please comment!

    God Bless!

    #Antiquity #Boudica #Celts #FemaleWarriors #history #Lagertha #Vikings
  2. You Know My Name, But Do You Really Know Me?

    For my last post in this series, I decided to cover two heroines who you may have heard of; you may even think you know about them. But do you? One of these women is a historically documented warrior, while the other’s existence has not been established. While it would be far more interesting if these ladies had encountered each other in battle, one lived in the first century while the other lived in the 12-13th century. So, who are these ladies? Boudica and Lagertha, of course. You may have guessed that from the AI image.

    So which one actually existed and which one are we unsure of? Boudica has been historically documented while Lagertha’s existence has never been confirmed via archeology or other historical record. We know about Boudica by virtue of the written record from two Roman historians—Tacitus, who wrote in the late first century/early second century, and Cassius Dio who wrote in the third century. On the other hand, the stories of Viking Shield Maiden Lagertha (also known as Lathgertha, Ladgerda or Lathgertha) come from the Saxo Grammaticus’ Gesta Danorum (Deeds of the Danes) which was written between the 12-13th century. Scholars, according to World History Encyclopedia, consider the early Saxon histories to be fictionalized. The History Channel’s series Vikings made Lagertha a household name in spite of her questionable authenticity. Nevertheless, it is likely that a shield maiden like Lagertha existed and makes a comparison to Boudica interesting.

    Boudica, as I have stated above, lived during the first century CE in eastern Britannia in the area of Norfolk. She was the queen of the Iceni tribe. The Iceni were a British Celtic-speaking people who were not necessarily a single, extended family group, but rather a large tribal community made up of numerous local groups and settlements. A terrific series called Britannia on Prime Video presents this period of time and similar Celtic tribes. Roman historians spoke of them as the Icenci and the Eceni. They were known to be prosperous having good soil for agriculture and access to the North Sea for trade with Europe. They were not considered primitive for the time period. They were known for sophisticated metalworking and long-distance trade routes. One of the most significant pieces of evidence of the Iceni was the Snettisham Hoard which was discovered in Norfolk. These treasures included gold and silver torcs, jewelry, coins, ingots and other decorated metalworks. In spite of this, however, their economy was primarily agricultural. They raised wheat, barley, cattle, sheep, pigs, and horses.

    The Icenci had an organized political structure prior to the Roman occupation of Britain. They also coined their own money. Boudica came to power after the death of her husband King Prasutagus. He is described as more of a “client” king—a local ruler who governed his people while recognizing Roman supremacy; however, that relationship broke down. One of the fascinating characteristics of the Iceni people was that women were allowed to possess significant wealth and status which is reflected in the graves discovered in the area of Norfolk. While not being a matriarchal community, women were allowed to own property and political power, like Boudica. Unfortunately, the Roman invasion of 43 CE under the leadership of Claudius would change the Iceni.

    As we have noted, the Iceni initially cooperated with Rome, but that relationship broke down following the death of Prasutagus. At the time of his death, he provided for the transfer of his wealth to be divided between his two daughters and Rome. However, Rome was not happy with that arrangement. According to Tacitus, Roman leaders seized the wealth and property of the Iceni, publically beat Boudica, and assaulted her daughters. The Iceni, lead by Boudica, revolted. They were joined by other tribes like the Trinovantes which was based in the area of modern day Essex and Colchester. Boudica and her forces destroyed the Camulodunum, Londinium, and the Verulamium through fighting and fire. Evidence of these battles has been found around Colchester, London, and St. Albans. Destruction was so severe that archaeologists have termed the rebellion the “Boudican Destruction Horizon”.

    Despite their initial success against Roman forces, the Iceni people were ultimately defeated by Suetonius Paulinus. Boudica would die soon after this. According to Tacitus, Boudica committed suicide by poisoning; Dio, on the other hand, claims that she died due to illness. The region once controlled by the Iceni was brought firmly into the Roman provincial system. Eventually their identity disappeared being assimilated into Anglo-Saxon Britain. Boudica was more than a warrior woman who took on the enemy; she was a symbol of the people she represented; a group of people who were more developed technically, wealthy, and politically sophisticated than many tribes of the day. However, Boudica was not an outlier in her community; the community produced other women like her. We know about her because she was a queen who faced Rome head on.

    How does Lagertha compare to Boudica? According to legend, Lagertha would have lived in nineth century Norway. Like Britain, Norway was not yet a unified country. Additionally, women were not “subordinate housewives”. They could possess wealth and political power within a traditional, patriarchal society. Men and women in Norway had different social roles, but historical evidence reflects wealthy and powerful people of both sexes. Marriage was a family and economic alliance. The woman’s family negotiated the marriage and it typically joined together two kin groups, though women were not distanced from their own families. Women often brought substantial wealth and property into marriages. In many cases, she could retain ownership of the property she brought into the marriage. This is quite different from European marital traditions. Moreover, women could divorce their husbands under certain circumstances like abuse, neglect, or insults towards her or her family.

    In Norwegian culture, the center of power was within the household, and the farm was the key economic unit. They did not look at this circumstance as women doing women’s work and men doing men’s work. Women managed the critical economic operation. While the men were out raiding and trading, women were producing textiles, tending to livestock, managing household resources, producing and preserving food, caring for their children, and much more. Archaeologists have discovered large numbers of graves of Viking women that contained keys, a symbol of household authority.

    A prime example of how Norwegian wealthy women could possess great power is contained in the Oseberg burial site which dates to around 834 CE. In this burial site, archaeologists discovered two women buried in an enormous ship along with a wagon, sledges, beds, chests, textiles, household equipment, elaborate carvings, animals, as well as the ship itself. While we do not know who these women were, it is evident that they were of high status. There is also archaeological evidence of women being buried with weapons like swords, axes, spears, and arrowheads. This is not to say that Norwegian culture was to be admired; the culture possessed dark aspects which negatively affected women. Specifically, women could be captured in battle, enslaved, sexually abused, sold, or killed in circumstances we would find reprehensible.

    So what does this tell us about our character Lagertha? Saxo had similar women upon which to create Lagertha. She embodied the independent, wealthy, politically influential and, sometimes, physically imposing Viking woman and then he pushes it to the extreme. Lagertha does it all and then some. She doesn’t just have influence inside her home; she becomes a ruler and commands warriors; ultimately killing the man who stood between her and political independence.

    Boudica and Lagertha could not have existed if not for the liberal, cultural ideals and practices of their communities. Boudica and the Iceni could have set the course for the women of Scandinavia having ten to eleven centuries between them. The comparison is quite compelling and inspiring. While other societies treated women as property to be controlled and of lower intellectual abilities, both of these societies provided, if not encouraged, women to participate in similar activities as men.

    I hope you have enjoyed these posts about influential women of antiquity. I have greatly enjoyed writing about them. I am now considering what my next series will be about. If you have any ideas, please comment!

    God Bless!

    #Antiquity #Boudica #Celts #FemaleWarriors #history #Lagertha #Vikings
  3. You Know My Name, But Do You Really Know Me?

    For my last post in this series, I decided to cover two heroines who you may have heard of; you may even think you know about them. But do you? One of these women is a historically documented warrior, while the other’s existence has not been established. While it would be far more interesting if these ladies had encountered each other in battle, one lived in the first century while the other lived in the 12-13th century. So, who are these ladies? Boudica and Lagertha, of course. You may have guessed that from the AI image.

    So which one actually existed and which one are we unsure of? Boudica has been historically documented while Lagertha’s existence has never been confirmed via archeology or other historical record. We know about Boudica by virtue of the written record from two Roman historians—Tacitus, who wrote in the late first century/early second century, and Cassius Dio who wrote in the third century. On the other hand, the stories of Viking Shield Maiden Lagertha (also known as Lathgertha, Ladgerda or Lathgertha) come from the Saxo Grammaticus’ Gesta Danorum (Deeds of the Danes) which was written between the 12-13th century. Scholars, according to World History Encyclopedia, consider the early Saxon histories to be fictionalized. The History Channel’s series Vikings made Lagertha a household name in spite of her questionable authenticity. Nevertheless, it is likely that a shield maiden like Lagertha existed and makes a comparison to Boudica interesting.

    Boudica, as I have stated above, lived during the first century CE in eastern Britannia in the area of Norfolk. She was the queen of the Iceni tribe. The Iceni were a British Celtic-speaking people who were not necessarily a single, extended family group, but rather a large tribal community made up of numerous local groups and settlements. A terrific series called Britannia on Prime Video presents this period of time and similar Celtic tribes. Roman historians spoke of them as the Icenci and the Eceni. They were known to be prosperous having good soil for agriculture and access to the North Sea for trade with Europe. They were not considered primitive for the time period. They were known for sophisticated metalworking and long-distance trade routes. One of the most significant pieces of evidence of the Iceni was the Snettisham Hoard which was discovered in Norfolk. These treasures included gold and silver torcs, jewelry, coins, ingots and other decorated metalworks. In spite of this, however, their economy was primarily agricultural. They raised wheat, barley, cattle, sheep, pigs, and horses.

    The Icenci had an organized political structure prior to the Roman occupation of Britain. They also coined their own money. Boudica came to power after the death of her husband King Prasutagus. He is described as more of a “client” king—a local ruler who governed his people while recognizing Roman supremacy; however, that relationship broke down. One of the fascinating characteristics of the Iceni people was that women were allowed to possess significant wealth and status which is reflected in the graves discovered in the area of Norfolk. While not being a matriarchal community, women were allowed to own property and political power, like Boudica. Unfortunately, the Roman invasion of 43 CE under the leadership of Claudius would change the Iceni.

    As we have noted, the Iceni initially cooperated with Rome, but that relationship broke down following the death of Prasutagus. At the time of his death, he provided for the transfer of his wealth to be divided between his two daughters and Rome. However, Rome was not happy with that arrangement. According to Tacitus, Roman leaders seized the wealth and property of the Iceni, publically beat Boudica, and assaulted her daughters. The Iceni, lead by Boudica, revolted. They were joined by other tribes like the Trinovantes which was based in the area of modern day Essex and Colchester. Boudica and her forces destroyed the Camulodunum, Londinium, and the Verulamium through fighting and fire. Evidence of these battles has been found around Colchester, London, and St. Albans. Destruction was so severe that archaeologists have termed the rebellion the “Boudican Destruction Horizon”.

    Despite their initial success against Roman forces, the Iceni people were ultimately defeated by Suetonius Paulinus. Boudica would die soon after this. According to Tacitus, Boudica committed suicide by poisoning; Dio, on the other hand, claims that she died due to illness. The region once controlled by the Iceni was brought firmly into the Roman provincial system. Eventually their identity disappeared being assimilated into Anglo-Saxon Britain. Boudica was more than a warrior woman who took on the enemy; she was a symbol of the people she represented; a group of people who were more developed technically, wealthy, and politically sophisticated than many tribes of the day. However, Boudica was not an outlier in her community; the community produced other women like her. We know about her because she was a queen who faced Rome head on.

    How does Lagertha compare to Boudica? According to legend, Lagertha would have lived in nineth century Norway. Like Britain, Norway was not yet a unified country. Additionally, women were not “subordinate housewives”. They could possess wealth and political power within a traditional, patriarchal society. Men and women in Norway had different social roles, but historical evidence reflects wealthy and powerful people of both sexes. Marriage was a family and economic alliance. The woman’s family negotiated the marriage and it typically joined together two kin groups, though women were not distanced from their own families. Women often brought substantial wealth and property into marriages. In many cases, she could retain ownership of the property she brought into the marriage. This is quite different from European marital traditions. Moreover, women could divorce their husbands under certain circumstances like abuse, neglect, or insults towards her or her family.

    In Norwegian culture, the center of power was within the household, and the farm was the key economic unit. They did not look at this circumstance as women doing women’s work and men doing men’s work. Women managed the critical economic operation. While the men were out raiding and trading, women were producing textiles, tending to livestock, managing household resources, producing and preserving food, caring for their children, and much more. Archaeologists have discovered large numbers of graves of Viking women that contained keys, a symbol of household authority.

    A prime example of how Norwegian wealthy women could possess great power is contained in the Oseberg burial site which dates to around 834 CE. In this burial site, archaeologists discovered two women buried in an enormous ship along with a wagon, sledges, beds, chests, textiles, household equipment, elaborate carvings, animals, as well as the ship itself. While we do not know who these women were, it is evident that they were of high status. There is also archaeological evidence of women being buried with weapons like swords, axes, spears, and arrowheads. This is not to say that Norwegian culture was to be admired; the culture possessed dark aspects which negatively affected women. Specifically, women could be captured in battle, enslaved, sexually abused, sold, or killed in circumstances we would find reprehensible.

    So what does this tell us about our character Lagertha? Saxo had similar women upon which to create Lagertha. She embodied the independent, wealthy, politically influential and, sometimes, physically imposing Viking woman and then he pushes it to the extreme. Lagertha does it all and then some. She doesn’t just have influence inside her home; she becomes a ruler and commands warriors; ultimately killing the man who stood between her and political independence.

    Boudica and Lagertha could not have existed if not for the liberal, cultural ideals and practices of their communities. Boudica and the Iceni could have set the course for the women of Scandinavia having ten to eleven centuries between them. The comparison is quite compelling and inspiring. While other societies treated women as property to be controlled and of lower intellectual abilities, both of these societies provided, if not encouraged, women to participate in similar activities as men.

    I hope you have enjoyed these posts about influential women of antiquity. I have greatly enjoyed writing about them. I am now considering what my next series will be about. If you have any ideas, please comment!

    God Bless!

    #Antiquity #Boudica #Celts #FemaleWarriors #history #Lagertha #Vikings
  4. You Know My Name, But Do You Really Know Me?

    For my last post in this series, I decided to cover two heroines who you may have heard of; you may even think you know about them. But do you? One of these women is a historically documented warrior, while the other’s existence has not been established. While it would be far more interesting if these ladies had encountered each other in battle, one lived in the first century while the other lived in the 12-13th century. So, who are these ladies? Boudica and Lagertha, of course. You may have guessed that from the AI image.

    So which one actually existed and which one are we unsure of? Boudica has been historically documented while Lagertha’s existence has never been confirmed via archeology or other historical record. We know about Boudica by virtue of the written record from two Roman historians—Tacitus, who wrote in the late first century/early second century, and Cassius Dio who wrote in the third century. On the other hand, the stories of Viking Shield Maiden Lagertha (also known as Lathgertha, Ladgerda or Lathgertha) come from the Saxo Grammaticus’ Gesta Danorum (Deeds of the Danes) which was written between the 12-13th century. Scholars, according to World History Encyclopedia, consider the early Saxon histories to be fictionalized. The History Channel’s series Vikings made Lagertha a household name in spite of her questionable authenticity. Nevertheless, it is likely that a shield maiden like Lagertha existed and makes a comparison to Boudica interesting.

    Boudica, as I have stated above, lived during the first century CE in eastern Britannia in the area of Norfolk. She was the queen of the Iceni tribe. The Iceni were a British Celtic-speaking people who were not necessarily a single, extended family group, but rather a large tribal community made up of numerous local groups and settlements. A terrific series called Britannia on Prime Video presents this period of time and similar Celtic tribes. Roman historians spoke of them as the Icenci and the Eceni. They were known to be prosperous having good soil for agriculture and access to the North Sea for trade with Europe. They were not considered primitive for the time period. They were known for sophisticated metalworking and long-distance trade routes. One of the most significant pieces of evidence of the Iceni was the Snettisham Hoard which was discovered in Norfolk. These treasures included gold and silver torcs, jewelry, coins, ingots and other decorated metalworks. In spite of this, however, their economy was primarily agricultural. They raised wheat, barley, cattle, sheep, pigs, and horses.

    The Icenci had an organized political structure prior to the Roman occupation of Britain. They also coined their own money. Boudica came to power after the death of her husband King Prasutagus. He is described as more of a “client” king—a local ruler who governed his people while recognizing Roman supremacy; however, that relationship broke down. One of the fascinating characteristics of the Iceni people was that women were allowed to possess significant wealth and status which is reflected in the graves discovered in the area of Norfolk. While not being a matriarchal community, women were allowed to own property and political power, like Boudica. Unfortunately, the Roman invasion of 43 CE under the leadership of Claudius would change the Iceni.

    As we have noted, the Iceni initially cooperated with Rome, but that relationship broke down following the death of Prasutagus. At the time of his death, he provided for the transfer of his wealth to be divided between his two daughters and Rome. However, Rome was not happy with that arrangement. According to Tacitus, Roman leaders seized the wealth and property of the Iceni, publically beat Boudica, and assaulted her daughters. The Iceni, lead by Boudica, revolted. They were joined by other tribes like the Trinovantes which was based in the area of modern day Essex and Colchester. Boudica and her forces destroyed the Camulodunum, Londinium, and the Verulamium through fighting and fire. Evidence of these battles has been found around Colchester, London, and St. Albans. Destruction was so severe that archaeologists have termed the rebellion the “Boudican Destruction Horizon”.

    Despite their initial success against Roman forces, the Iceni people were ultimately defeated by Suetonius Paulinus. Boudica would die soon after this. According to Tacitus, Boudica committed suicide by poisoning; Dio, on the other hand, claims that she died due to illness. The region once controlled by the Iceni was brought firmly into the Roman provincial system. Eventually their identity disappeared being assimilated into Anglo-Saxon Britain. Boudica was more than a warrior woman who took on the enemy; she was a symbol of the people she represented; a group of people who were more developed technically, wealthy, and politically sophisticated than many tribes of the day. However, Boudica was not an outlier in her community; the community produced other women like her. We know about her because she was a queen who faced Rome head on.

    How does Lagertha compare to Boudica? According to legend, Lagertha would have lived in nineth century Norway. Like Britain, Norway was not yet a unified country. Additionally, women were not “subordinate housewives”. They could possess wealth and political power within a traditional, patriarchal society. Men and women in Norway had different social roles, but historical evidence reflects wealthy and powerful people of both sexes. Marriage was a family and economic alliance. The woman’s family negotiated the marriage and it typically joined together two kin groups, though women were not distanced from their own families. Women often brought substantial wealth and property into marriages. In many cases, she could retain ownership of the property she brought into the marriage. This is quite different from European marital traditions. Moreover, women could divorce their husbands under certain circumstances like abuse, neglect, or insults towards her or her family.

    In Norwegian culture, the center of power was within the household, and the farm was the key economic unit. They did not look at this circumstance as women doing women’s work and men doing men’s work. Women managed the critical economic operation. While the men were out raiding and trading, women were producing textiles, tending to livestock, managing household resources, producing and preserving food, caring for their children, and much more. Archaeologists have discovered large numbers of graves of Viking women that contained keys, a symbol of household authority.

    A prime example of how Norwegian wealthy women could possess great power is contained in the Oseberg burial site which dates to around 834 CE. In this burial site, archaeologists discovered two women buried in an enormous ship along with a wagon, sledges, beds, chests, textiles, household equipment, elaborate carvings, animals, as well as the ship itself. While we do not know who these women were, it is evident that they were of high status. There is also archaeological evidence of women being buried with weapons like swords, axes, spears, and arrowheads. This is not to say that Norwegian culture was to be admired; the culture possessed dark aspects which negatively affected women. Specifically, women could be captured in battle, enslaved, sexually abused, sold, or killed in circumstances we would find reprehensible.

    So what does this tell us about our character Lagertha? Saxo had similar women upon which to create Lagertha. She embodied the independent, wealthy, politically influential and, sometimes, physically imposing Viking woman and then he pushes it to the extreme. Lagertha does it all and then some. She doesn’t just have influence inside her home; she becomes a ruler and commands warriors; ultimately killing the man who stood between her and political independence.

    Boudica and Lagertha could not have existed if not for the liberal, cultural ideals and practices of their communities. Boudica and the Iceni could have set the course for the women of Scandinavia having ten to eleven centuries between them. The comparison is quite compelling and inspiring. While other societies treated women as property to be controlled and of lower intellectual abilities, both of these societies provided, if not encouraged, women to participate in similar activities as men.

    I hope you have enjoyed these posts about influential women of antiquity. I have greatly enjoyed writing about them. I am now considering what my next series will be about. If you have any ideas, please comment!

    God Bless!

    #Antiquity #Boudica #Celts #FemaleWarriors #history #Lagertha #Vikings
  5. You Know My Name, But Do You Really Know Me?

    For my last post in this series, I decided to cover two heroines who you may have heard of; you may even think you know about them. But do you? One of these women is a historically documented warrior, while the other’s existence has not been established. While it would be far more interesting if these ladies had encountered each other in battle, one lived in the first century while the other lived in the 12-13th century. So, who are these ladies? Boudica and Lagertha, of course. You may have guessed that from the AI image.

    So which one actually existed and which one are we unsure of? Boudica has been historically documented while Lagertha’s existence has never been confirmed via archeology or other historical record. We know about Boudica by virtue of the written record from two Roman historians—Tacitus, who wrote in the late first century/early second century, and Cassius Dio who wrote in the third century. On the other hand, the stories of Viking Shield Maiden Lagertha (also known as Lathgertha, Ladgerda or Lathgertha) come from the Saxo Grammaticus’ Gesta Danorum (Deeds of the Danes) which was written between the 12-13th century. Scholars, according to World History Encyclopedia, consider the early Saxon histories to be fictionalized. The History Channel’s series Vikings made Lagertha a household name in spite of her questionable authenticity. Nevertheless, it is likely that a shield maiden like Lagertha existed and makes a comparison to Boudica interesting.

    Boudica, as I have stated above, lived during the first century CE in eastern Britannia in the area of Norfolk. She was the queen of the Iceni tribe. The Iceni were a British Celtic-speaking people who were not necessarily a single, extended family group, but rather a large tribal community made up of numerous local groups and settlements. A terrific series called Britannia on Prime Video presents this period of time and similar Celtic tribes. Roman historians spoke of them as the Icenci and the Eceni. They were known to be prosperous having good soil for agriculture and access to the North Sea for trade with Europe. They were not considered primitive for the time period. They were known for sophisticated metalworking and long-distance trade routes. One of the most significant pieces of evidence of the Iceni was the Snettisham Hoard which was discovered in Norfolk. These treasures included gold and silver torcs, jewelry, coins, ingots and other decorated metalworks. In spite of this, however, their economy was primarily agricultural. They raised wheat, barley, cattle, sheep, pigs, and horses.

    The Icenci had an organized political structure prior to the Roman occupation of Britain. They also coined their own money. Boudica came to power after the death of her husband King Prasutagus. He is described as more of a “client” king—a local ruler who governed his people while recognizing Roman supremacy; however, that relationship broke down. One of the fascinating characteristics of the Iceni people was that women were allowed to possess significant wealth and status which is reflected in the graves discovered in the area of Norfolk. While not being a matriarchal community, women were allowed to own property and political power, like Boudica. Unfortunately, the Roman invasion of 43 CE under the leadership of Claudius would change the Iceni.

    As we have noted, the Iceni initially cooperated with Rome, but that relationship broke down following the death of Prasutagus. At the time of his death, he provided for the transfer of his wealth to be divided between his two daughters and Rome. However, Rome was not happy with that arrangement. According to Tacitus, Roman leaders seized the wealth and property of the Iceni, publically beat Boudica, and assaulted her daughters. The Iceni, lead by Boudica, revolted. They were joined by other tribes like the Trinovantes which was based in the area of modern day Essex and Colchester. Boudica and her forces destroyed the Camulodunum, Londinium, and the Verulamium through fighting and fire. Evidence of these battles has been found around Colchester, London, and St. Albans. Destruction was so severe that archaeologists have termed the rebellion the “Boudican Destruction Horizon”.

    Despite their initial success against Roman forces, the Iceni people were ultimately defeated by Suetonius Paulinus. Boudica would die soon after this. According to Tacitus, Boudica committed suicide by poisoning; Dio, on the other hand, claims that she died due to illness. The region once controlled by the Iceni was brought firmly into the Roman provincial system. Eventually their identity disappeared being assimilated into Anglo-Saxon Britain. Boudica was more than a warrior woman who took on the enemy; she was a symbol of the people she represented; a group of people who were more developed technically, wealthy, and politically sophisticated than many tribes of the day. However, Boudica was not an outlier in her community; the community produced other women like her. We know about her because she was a queen who faced Rome head on.

    How does Lagertha compare to Boudica? According to legend, Lagertha would have lived in nineth century Norway. Like Britain, Norway was not yet a unified country. Additionally, women were not “subordinate housewives”. They could possess wealth and political power within a traditional, patriarchal society. Men and women in Norway had different social roles, but historical evidence reflects wealthy and powerful people of both sexes. Marriage was a family and economic alliance. The woman’s family negotiated the marriage and it typically joined together two kin groups, though women were not distanced from their own families. Women often brought substantial wealth and property into marriages. In many cases, she could retain ownership of the property she brought into the marriage. This is quite different from European marital traditions. Moreover, women could divorce their husbands under certain circumstances like abuse, neglect, or insults towards her or her family.

    In Norwegian culture, the center of power was within the household, and the farm was the key economic unit. They did not look at this circumstance as women doing women’s work and men doing men’s work. Women managed the critical economic operation. While the men were out raiding and trading, women were producing textiles, tending to livestock, managing household resources, producing and preserving food, caring for their children, and much more. Archaeologists have discovered large numbers of graves of Viking women that contained keys, a symbol of household authority.

    A prime example of how Norwegian wealthy women could possess great power is contained in the Oseberg burial site which dates to around 834 CE. In this burial site, archaeologists discovered two women buried in an enormous ship along with a wagon, sledges, beds, chests, textiles, household equipment, elaborate carvings, animals, as well as the ship itself. While we do not know who these women were, it is evident that they were of high status. There is also archaeological evidence of women being buried with weapons like swords, axes, spears, and arrowheads. This is not to say that Norwegian culture was to be admired; the culture possessed dark aspects which negatively affected women. Specifically, women could be captured in battle, enslaved, sexually abused, sold, or killed in circumstances we would find reprehensible.

    So what does this tell us about our character Lagertha? Saxo had similar women upon which to create Lagertha. She embodied the independent, wealthy, politically influential and, sometimes, physically imposing Viking woman and then he pushes it to the extreme. Lagertha does it all and then some. She doesn’t just have influence inside her home; she becomes a ruler and commands warriors; ultimately killing the man who stood between her and political independence.

    Boudica and Lagertha could not have existed if not for the liberal, cultural ideals and practices of their communities. Boudica and the Iceni could have set the course for the women of Scandinavia having ten to eleven centuries between them. The comparison is quite compelling and inspiring. While other societies treated women as property to be controlled and of lower intellectual abilities, both of these societies provided, if not encouraged, women to participate in similar activities as men.

    I hope you have enjoyed these posts about influential women of antiquity. I have greatly enjoyed writing about them. I am now considering what my next series will be about. If you have any ideas, please comment!

    God Bless!

    #Antiquity #Boudica #Celts #FemaleWarriors #history #Lagertha #Vikings
  6. "The British did this great evil thing; the British did that great evil thing..."

    Wholeheartedly AGREE. And, if you think you're gonna school me about the atrocities by Great Britain, while knowing Jack Shit about the baddest BRITON (pre-GB) ever, then you look like a clown.
    #Boudica

  7. History shames women who wield power while glorifying men.

    #Cleopatra: vilified for her intelligence and alliances

    #Boudica: demonised for leading a revolt against Rome

    They acted decisively. Society painted them as dangerous. 5)

    #HistoricalBias #WomenInPower

  8. History shames women who wield power while glorifying men.

    #Cleopatra: vilified for her intelligence and alliances

    #Boudica: demonised for leading a revolt against Rome

    They acted decisively. Society painted them as dangerous. 5)

    #HistoricalBias #WomenInPower

  9. History shames women who wield power while glorifying men.

    #Cleopatra: vilified for her intelligence and alliances

    #Boudica: demonised for leading a revolt against Rome

    They acted decisively. Society painted them as dangerous. 5)

    #HistoricalBias #WomenInPower

  10. History shames women who wield power while glorifying men.

    #Cleopatra: vilified for her intelligence and alliances

    #Boudica: demonised for leading a revolt against Rome

    They acted decisively. Society painted them as dangerous. 5)

    #HistoricalBias #WomenInPower

  11. History shames women who wield power while glorifying men.

    #Cleopatra: vilified for her intelligence and alliances

    #Boudica: demonised for leading a revolt against Rome

    They acted decisively. Society painted them as dangerous. 5)

    #HistoricalBias #WomenInPower

  12. People reimagine Himiko, the shaman queen, for their own purposes. Boudica, a female ruler, led her tribe in rebellion. Kong Sin spread shamanism across Korea. #ShamanQueen #Himiko #Boudica #KongSin #FemaleLeaders #Mythology #History

  13. People reimagine Himiko, the shaman queen, for their own purposes. Boudica, a female ruler, led her tribe in rebellion. Kong Sin spread shamanism across Korea. #ShamanQueen #Himiko #Boudica #KongSin #FemaleLeaders #Mythology #History

  14. Vooroordelen over gender

    Mannen en vrouwen, zoals Erica Jong al wist, daar moet wel ellende van komen. In elk geval is het idee dat de natuur slechts mannelijke en vrouwelijke mensen zou kennen, dus mensen met een X- en een Y-chromosoom of mensen met twee X-chromosomen, simpelweg onjuist. Dat is geen nieuw inzicht; het was in elk geval leerstof toen ik in 4 VWO zat, ergens rond 1980. Ik hoef u verder niet te vertellen dat niet iedereen heteroseksueel is, ik hoef u niet te vertellen dat oriëntatie niet bij iedereen levenslang dezelfde blijft, en evenmin hoef ik te vertellen dat er trans-, cis-, a-, inter- en biseksuele mensen bestaan. En tot slot variëren de maatschappelijke verwachtingen, want gender is niet alleen een kwestie van natuur, maar ook van cultuur. Daarom wordt er zo verschillend over gedacht. Ik zal wel iets hebben overgeslagen, maar het moge duidelijk zijn: het is allemaal nogal complex.

    Wetenschappelijke vooroordelen

    Omdat gender zo complex is als de mens zelf, trek je regelmatig je wenkbrauwen op bij het lezen van wetenschappelijke literatuur. Vaak analyseerden onderzoekers hun data aan de hand van de simpele dichotomie man/vrouw. Vonden ze een graf met wapens, dan was het automatisch een man; lazen ze over vrouwen die zich bij festivals staken in mannenkleding, dan was het automatisch een omkeringsfeest, veronderstellend dat er twee genders zijn.

    De crux van oudheidkunde is de spanning tussen de opvattingen van de samenleving van de onderzoeker en de onderzochte samenleving. Eerstejaarsstof dus, en gender-opvattingen lenen zich daar goed voor. Mijn docent Bert van der Spek attendeerde zijn studenten op de aannames in het (nog altijd leverbare) boek The Greeks van de Britse classicus H.D.F. Kitto. Andere docenten zullen wel andere voorbeelden hebben gebruikt.

    Elke oudheidkundige weet dus dat het zo simpel allemaal niet is, maar het blijft zinvol op een rij te zetten wat er zoal verkeerd kan gaan, en zo hebben we Gender Stereotypes in Archaeology (open access), waarin een auteursteam op vierenzestig bladzijden vierentwintig vooroordelen op een rijtje zet. Eerst gaan die over oudheidkundige representatie, vervolgens over interpretatie, en tot slot over het wetenschappelijk bedrijf. Het is, zoals je verwacht, “a mixed bag” met wat goede en wat minder goede artikelen, maar al met al is het een nuttig boekje dat de lezer minimaal dwingt even z’n knopen na te tellen.

    Stropoppen

    Eerlijk gezegd begint het niet werkelijk overtuigend met opmerkingen over de wijze waarop de oude wereld wordt gepresenteerd. Zo zouden vrouwen nogal eens als koks worden afgebeeld of als zorgverleners, zo zouden mannen vaak in actieve rollen worden afgebeeld en vrouwen in passieve, en “All women were young, slim, and beautiful in the past, while all men were young, tall, and athletic.”

    Nou kom ik weleens in musea, en ik kan me dit eigenlijk niet herinneren. Het enige Nederlandse voorbeeld dat me te binnen schiet is een animatie in Heerlen, waar een paar jaar geleden twee mensen worden opgevoerd die naar het Romeinse badhuis komen: de eerste een stoere soldaat, de tweede een jonge vrouw die graag mooi wil zijn. Dat is inderdaad rolpatroonbevestigend, maar het is bij mijn weten de uitzondering. Kortom, Gender Stereotypes in Archaeology begint met het omverschieten van een stropop.

    Vooroordelen

    Het wordt al snel interessant. Eigenlijk is elke hoofdstuktitel een juweeltje: als je de titel leest, weet je al hoe belachelijk het vooroordeel eigenlijk is. “Only men were violent in past societies.” Antieke afbeeldingen geven die indruk, maar iedereen kan tegenvoorbeelden bedenken. In Romeinse legerkampen zijn voldoende typische vrouwenvoorwerpen gevonden om te concluderen dat er vrouwen in het kamp waren – een melkkolf in Oudenburg – en die vrouwen kunnen gevechtstaken hebben gehad. Het bewijs voor vrouwelijke krijgers bij de Skythen is erg sterk, de mythe van de amazones gaat minimaal ten dele terug op vrouwelijke krijgers in de Bambouk, binnenkort blog ik over Kahina en u heeft allemaal weleens van Boudica gehoord.

    Er wordt korte metten gemaakt met het vooroordeel dat prehistorische afbeeldingen van vrouwen moedergodinnen zijn; het idee dat gezinnen bestonden uit één vader en één moeder en kinderen, verdwijnt richting schroothoop; en de lezer van dit blogje weet dat het onzin is dat “binary sex” de enige natuurlijke vorm zou zijn. Het is allemaal heel goed uitgelegd. Tegen het einde komen de meer politieke vooroordelen aan bod: dat gender-studies ideologisch gedreven zouden zijn, of dat er inmiddels zó veel bewustzijn is van de problematiek, dat er niet langer speciaal op gewezen hoeft te worden.

    Carrière en grensoverschrijdend gedrag

    Aan het einde van Gender Stereotypes in Archaeology waren twee hoofdstukjes waarbij ik me ongemakkelijk voelde. Het voorlaatste vooroordeel is dat vrouwen in de archeologie gelijke carrièrekansen zouden hebben als mannen. Dit is geen speciaal archeologisch probleem, dit is een algemeen probleem en hoort eigenlijk niet in dit boekje. Tot slot is er aandacht voor het vooroordeel dat archeologie vrij zou zijn van grensoverschrijdend gedrag. Ik denk niet dat ook maar iemand deze geruststellende gedachte heeft.

    Ik voelde mezelf betrapt in het hoofdstukje over het vooroordeel dat antieke samenlevingen óf matriarchaal óf patriarchaal waren. Ik neem over het algemeen aan dat samenlevingen patriarchaal zijn, attendeer er regelmatig op dat het bewijs voor matriarchale samenlevingen zwak is, maar ik leerde nu dat die dichotomie niet bestaat. Ik kan beter zeggen of schrijven dat de meeste samenlevingen “grotendeels patriarchaal” zijn. Als iedereen op één punt iets afleert, is Gender Stereotypes in Archaeology een nuttig boekje.

    [De oudheidkundige wetenschappen zijn in de eerste plaats wetenschappen. Een overzicht van stukjes over het wetenschappelijk aspect, vindt u daar.]

    Deze blog, die u ook via het Whatsapp-kanaal kunt volgen, is niet mijn enige activiteit. Ik bied ook cursussen aan.

    Deel dit:

    #Boudica #gender #HDFKitto #Kahina #moedergodin

  15. Exhibit A in the trial of Boudica: Crimes Against Torcs.

    #Boudica

  16. Exhibit A in the trial of Boudica: Crimes Against Torcs.

    #Boudica

  17. Exhibit A in the trial of Boudica: Crimes Against Torcs.

    #Boudica

  18. Exhibit A in the trial of Boudica: Crimes Against Torcs.

    #Boudica

  19. Exhibit A in the trial of Boudica: Crimes Against Torcs.

    #Boudica

  20. I've had a really crappy week so settled down, with beer and crisps, to watch the lunacy that is the new #Boudica film. It is gloriously, wonderfully, terrible.

    Upside - a wonderful ancestral theme to the artefact stories in it and *loads* of torcs (... even if one of them is the Ipswich terminal pendant currently sold in the BM shop!!!! 🤣🤣🤣)

    (NB It's gory... def not one for the whole family)

    #Archaeology

  21. I've had a really crappy week so settled down, with beer and crisps, to watch the lunacy that is the new #Boudica film. It is gloriously, wonderfully, terrible.

    Upside - a wonderful ancestral theme to the artefact stories in it and *loads* of torcs (... even if one of them is the Ipswich terminal pendant currently sold in the BM shop!!!! 🤣🤣🤣)

    (NB It's gory... def not one for the whole family)

    #Archaeology

  22. I've had a really crappy week so settled down, with beer and crisps, to watch the lunacy that is the new #Boudica film. It is gloriously, wonderfully, terrible.

    Upside - a wonderful ancestral theme to the artefact stories in it and *loads* of torcs (... even if one of them is the Ipswich terminal pendant currently sold in the BM shop!!!! 🤣🤣🤣)

    (NB It's gory... def not one for the whole family)

    #Archaeology

  23. I've had a really crappy week so settled down, with beer and crisps, to watch the lunacy that is the new #Boudica film. It is gloriously, wonderfully, terrible.

    Upside - a wonderful ancestral theme to the artefact stories in it and *loads* of torcs (... even if one of them is the Ipswich terminal pendant currently sold in the BM shop!!!! 🤣🤣🤣)

    (NB It's gory... def not one for the whole family)

    #Archaeology

  24. I've had a really crappy week so settled down, with beer and crisps, to watch the lunacy that is the new #Boudica film. It is gloriously, wonderfully, terrible.

    Upside - a wonderful ancestral theme to the artefact stories in it and *loads* of torcs (... even if one of them is the Ipswich terminal pendant currently sold in the BM shop!!!! 🤣🤣🤣)

    (NB It's gory... def not one for the whole family)

    #Archaeology

  25. with her new !
    www.sculptor.co.in

  26. Stanley doesn't remember the original Tom & Jerry cartoons and is therefore less than impressed with my version of Spike! Made from mainly car & lorry parts he's now the proud pup of #Boudica (a previous #Scarecrow festival commission)#Metalwork #Fabrication #Recycling #Upcycling #ConRods #NutsAndBolts #CoilOvers #dogsofmastodon
    #BullDog

  27. Stanley doesn't remember the original Tom & Jerry cartoons and is therefore less than impressed with my version of Spike! Made from mainly car & lorry parts he's now the proud pup of #Boudica (a previous #Scarecrow festival commission)#Metalwork #Fabrication #Recycling #Upcycling #ConRods #NutsAndBolts #CoilOvers #dogsofmastodon
    #BullDog

  28. Stanley doesn't remember the original Tom & Jerry cartoons and is therefore less than impressed with my version of Spike! Made from mainly car & lorry parts he's now the proud pup of #Boudica (a previous #Scarecrow festival commission)#Metalwork #Fabrication #Recycling #Upcycling #ConRods #NutsAndBolts #CoilOvers #dogsofmastodon
    #BullDog

  29. Stanley doesn't remember the original Tom & Jerry cartoons and is therefore less than impressed with my version of Spike! Made from mainly car & lorry parts he's now the proud pup of (a previous festival commission)#Metalwork

  30. Stanley doesn't remember the original Tom & Jerry cartoons and is therefore less than impressed with my version of Spike! Made from mainly car & lorry parts he's now the proud pup of #Boudica (a previous #Scarecrow festival commission)#Metalwork #Fabrication #Recycling #Upcycling #ConRods #NutsAndBolts #CoilOvers #dogsofmastodon
    #BullDog

  31. Very much recommending this new book by Duncan Mackay to you all.... it's a superb read with a lot of new information and written in a lovely style.

    There's enough precise detail for archaeologists/historians, but it is also a cracking good read with plenty of humour... one of those fabulous books that not only educates, but entertains!!

    Echolands: A journey in search of Boudica by Duncan Mackay.

    #Archaeology #Prehistory #Norfolk #Boudica #StAlbans